The present invention relates generally to a security system employing techniques related to subliminal messaging, which compel wrongdoers to voluntarily disclose to security officials their potentially criminal acts prior to such criminal activity occurring and/or deterring such acts altogether.
Concerns for addressing issues of National Security have been a growing concern worldwide in recent years with increasing violence associated with terrorist activities, particularly in light of “homegrown” radicalization across many nations. Numerous solutions have been developed to address preventive and deterrent measures to mitigate human casualties from such terrorist activities. However, in developed countries, such as the United States, governments must straddle a balance between security and privacy protections assured to citizens via national laws, such as for example the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution which creates a necessary boundary between government encroachments upon the reasonable expectation of privacy of citizens against unwarranted invasions, such as surveillance. Indeed, relatively recent disclosures by National Security Agency analyst Edward Snowden revealed massive surveillance of American citizens on an unprecedented scale, even in the face of Congressional testimony by the Director of National Intelligence to the contrary, which may have violated such a balance between privacy protections and attempts to provide national security.
Significant resources have been employed for widespread surveillance of persons of interest by governmental bodies, such as the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the like. Furthermore, since the infamous attack in New York on Sep. 11, 2001 on the World Trade Center, wherein airplanes were used as weapons to attack American citizens, significant measures have been taken to prevent such egregious attacks in the future, such as for example extensive screening in airports prior to allowing persons to board airplanes. However, for every security measure taken, be it surveillance, airport screening and the like, all such measures have limited effectiveness. For example, in mass surveillance, persons plotting harm can use coded methods to avoid detection, even when directly monitored. Also, the Transportation Security Administration, primarily responsible for airport security regularly fails to detect harmful objects being taken onto airplanes. Indeed, in recent years bullets, knives and other contraband have been taken onto public aircrafts.
Also, although significantly less dramatic, security associated with retail and merchandise continues to be an issue for stores or other business establishments, which are often popular targets for larceny. In-store cameras, security guards and the like are measures with less than perfect records of mitigating theft.
It would be helpful to have a security measure which is more effective than current methods for both preventing casualties associated with terrorist activities as well as common theft in retail stores.
The present teachings disclose methods and apparatuses that address these concerns. The present teachings solve these problems, as will now be described.
Embodiments of the present disclosure will be more readily understood by reference to the following figures, in which like reference numbers and designations indicate like elements.
Embodiments of the present teachings focus on preventing criminal acts prior to the commission of such acts in a manner that encourages the potential criminal to come forward and confess to law enforcement officials, or refrain from committing the potential criminal act altogether. Embodiments of the present teachings focus on addressing the two components of criminal activity, which will now be described in further detail.
Generally speaking a criminal act requires two fundamental components, mens rea and actus reus. That is, a crime generally requires a mental component, mens rea, and a physical component or act, actus reus. However, there are crimes wherein the mental component is irrelevant and not necessary to establish facts for a conviction of such a crime, which is referred to as a General Intent crime. In a General Intent crime, it is the act itself which constitutes the completed crime. That is, in General Intent crime, the primary inquiry is whether the crime itself was completed. Examples of General Intent crimes include Battery and Rape, wherein completion of the act itself constitutes a complete crime, regardless of intent to commit the crime. In stark contrast, a Specific Intent crime requires that in addition to the criminal act itself, a mental component to commit the crime is also present. In one example of a Specific Intent crime, Larceny is the intentional unlawful taking and carrying away of the property of another with the intent to deprive the lawful owner of the property. One defense to a Specific Intent crime is negating the mens rea, that is the mental component. If the mens rea is negated, this provides a defense to the crime, because in order to be liable for a Specific Intent crime, intent must have been formed. For example, if a person walks into a sporting goods store and picks up a golf club, does not pay for it, and walks out of the store, they may be charged with Larceny. However, because Larceny is a Specific Intent crime, if there are some facts to negate the mental component, the mens rea, the charge of Larceny cannot sustain. For example, if the person who took the golf club from the sporting goods store was inebriated (e.g., drunk or drugged), then they would not be able to form the proper mental state for sustaining a criminal charge of Larceny, because the inebriation would negate the formation of a criminal mental state. However, in the case of General Intent crimes, such a defense is not viable, as the completion of the act itself is only necessary for a criminal charge to sustain.
Some embodiments of the present teachings focus on negating the mens rea component of a crime and other embodiments focus on deterring the actus reus component.
It is an object of the present teachings to address negation of the formation of the mens rea component of a crime by providing subliminal messages which subconsciously erode a person's mental willpower to sustain the intent to commit a crime, or alternatively, to provide subliminal messaging that prevents spontaneous intent to commit a crime, such as for example criminal intent spontaneously developed in the context of simple shoplifting at a retail store.
It is an object of the present teachings to address the prevention of the commission of criminal acts, in that apparatuses and methods disclosed herein provide a solution to preventing the actus reus of criminals by encouraging prospective criminals to surrender and confess prior to the commission of a criminal act, or to physically debilitate such an individual such that commission of the crime becomes impossible.
Referring now generally to
Embodiments of the present teachings are designed to compel persons intending criminal activity to either refrain from such activity, or to confess to law enforcement such premeditated criminal activity.
In one illustrative exemplary embodiment, shown in
A described above, it will be appreciated that embodiments of the present disclosure address both the mens rea (i.e., mental component of the criminal act) and actus reus (i.e., physical component of the criminal act). For example, some crimes may be premeditated and some crimes may be spontaneous. If the crime is premeditated, then the mens rea element has already been formed, such as for example a terrorist strapping on a bomb vest with the intent to detonate an explosive device to harm other persons, then walking into an airport or other public place. In such a criminal activity, embodiments of the present teachings focus on the actus reus element of the crime, so as to most efficiently provide strategic and tactical countermeasures, designed to deter the criminal act. For example, if the subliminal message “POLICE WATCHING” as shown in
Other crimes may be spontaneous, such as for example a teenager at a retail store randomly deciding to shoplift, who did not walk into the store intending to commit a crime, but then may see an item for which they may begin to form the mental intent to steal. In such a situation, the subliminal message “POLICE WATCHING” as shown in
It will be appreciated that
In one embodiment,
Referring now to
Referring now to
In this embodiment, the subliminal message 304, “SAFETY IN THE WORKPLACE” is designed to influence the subconscious mind of workers in a work environment, to encourage safe behavior to avoid physical injury. Although this embodiment utilizes techniques described above with respect to the previously disclosed embodiments, this embodiment target non-criminal behavior, such as for example behaving in a manner which may be dangerous to workers in their place of employment.
Referring now to
It will be appreciated, that in addition to the above described embodiments, having visual subliminal messaging, it is also possible to employ audio subliminal messaging to either bolster the effectiveness of the visual subliminal messages, or in place of them. That is, the above described subliminal messaging may be adapted for audio applications, such as broadcasting sounds that appeal to the subconscious brain to influence deterrence of criminal activity and/or encourage workplace safety. For example, quiet audio messages, just below the audible range of human hearing may be employed to implement such audio subliminal messaging. In another embodiment, interspersing audio subliminal messages in music may also be employed to negate mens rea, actus reus, and/or influence workplace safety.
In one embodiment, within the scope and spirit of the present teachings, strobing lights may be used. For example, blue strobing lights with a reactive paint upon one or more walls may be used, wherein the light is a specific frequency designed to trigger the reactive elements with a paint upon a wall, such it is apparent to subliminal aspects of the human mind and eyes. In one example, the light and paint may be used to induce signs of nervousness in criminals. Also, embodiments of the present teachings may be used in police or other law enforcement interrogation rooms, and/or jails or prisons to induce desired confessions or behaviors.
Embodiments of the present teachings may be implemented using a video screen, such as for example using pixels on an LED or LCD screen. In one embodiment, the present teachings may be used at border crossings to induce criminals to express nervousness, which would then be obvious to guards
The foregoing description illustrates exemplary implementations, and novel features, of aspects of a subliminal security apparatus and method. Alternative implementations are suggested, but it is impractical to list all alternative implementations of the present teachings. Therefore, the scope of the presented disclosure should be determined only by reference to the appended claims, and should not be limited by features illustrated in the foregoing description except insofar as such limitation is recited in an appended claim.
While the above description has pointed out novel features of the present disclosure as applied to various embodiments, the skilled person will understand that various omissions, substitutions, permutations, and changes in the form and details of the present teachings illustrated may be made without departing from the scope of the present teachings.
Each practical and novel combination of the elements and alternatives described hereinabove, and each practical combination of equivalents to such elements, is contemplated as an embodiment of the present teachings. Because many more element combinations are contemplated as embodiments of the present teachings than can reasonably be explicitly enumerated herein, the scope of the present teachings is properly defined by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All variations coming within the meaning and range of equivalency of the various claim elements are embraced within the scope of the corresponding claim. Each claim set forth below is intended to encompass any apparatus or method that differs only insubstantially from the literal language of such claim, as long as such apparatus or method is not, in fact, an embodiment of the prior art. To this end, each described element in each claim should be construed as broadly as possible, and moreover should be understood to encompass any equivalent to such element insofar as possible without also encompassing the prior art. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising”.
This non provisional U.S. patent application claims the benefit of priority to earlier filed U.S. provisional patent application having Ser. No. 62/507,790, entitled, “SUBLIMINAL SECURITY APPARATUS AND METHOD”, filed May 18, 2017 and is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3060795 | Corrigan | Oct 1962 | A |
4270284 | Skellings | Jun 1981 | A |
4279088 | Hyre | Jul 1981 | A |
4692118 | Mould | Sep 1987 | A |
4734037 | McClure | Mar 1988 | A |
5017143 | Backus | May 1991 | A |
5221962 | Backus | Jun 1993 | A |
5270800 | Sweet | Dec 1993 | A |
6108142 | Haseltine | Aug 2000 | A |
6940432 | Hall | Sep 2005 | B1 |
8188990 | Zamorsky | May 2012 | B2 |
20030235808 | Hardison | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20080244940 | Mesika | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190088174 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62507790 | May 2017 | US |