Technical Field
The present disclosure relates generally to the field of submerged combustion glass melters and methods of use.
Background Art
Submerged combustion melters are known for producing molten glass. Submerged combustion melters and their operation may cause exhaust pressure and exhaust volume fluctuations due to large bubbles of gas from submerged combustion burners, which may lead to batch (starting material) carryover and/or molten glass carryover into the melter exhaust. Carryover may lead to reduced exhaust flow or even in some circumstances plugging of the exhaust ducts.
It would be an advance in the submerged combustion glass melting art to develop melters and methods of using them that reduce or overcome one or more of these problems.
In accordance with the present disclosure, submerged combustion melters and methods of use are described that may allow reduction of melter pressure fluctuations and/or carryover.
A first aspect of the disclosure is a submerged combustion glass manufacturing system comprising:
a melter comprising a floor, a roof, and a wall structure connecting the floor and roof, and an exhaust passage through the roof;
one or more submerged combustion burners mounted in the floor and/or wall structure, the submerged combustion burners configured to discharge combustion products under a level of material being melted in the melter and create turbulent conditions in substantially all of the material; and
an exhaust structure fluidly connecting the exhaust passage with an exhaust stack, the exhaust structure comprising a barrier preventing exhaust material from contacting the atmosphere, the barrier defining an exhaust chamber having an interior surface, the exhaust chamber having a cross-sectional area greater than that of the exhaust stack but less than the melter, the barrier configured to maintain temperature and pressure in the exhaust structure at values sufficient to substantially prevent condensation of exhaust material on the interior surface.
A second aspect of the disclosure is a submerged combustion glass manufacturing system comprising:
a melter comprising a floor, a roof, and a wall structure connecting the floor and roof, a feed inlet in a feed end, a molten glass outlet in an exit end, and an exhaust passage through the roof positioned substantially centrally between the feed and exit ends;
one or more submerged combustion burners mounted in the floor and/or wall structure, the submerged combustion burners configured to discharge combustion products under a level of material being melted in the melter and create turbulent conditions in substantially all of the material; and
an exhaust structure fluidly connecting the exhaust passage with an exhaust stack, the exhaust structure comprising:
A third aspect of the disclosure is a method of manufacturing glass comprising:
melting glass-forming materials in a submerged combustion melter, the melter comprising a floor, a roof, and a wall structure connecting the floor and roof, and an exhaust passage through the roof;
combusting a fuel in one or more submerged combustion burners mounted in the floor and/or wall structure, the submerged combustion burners discharging combustion products under a level of the glass-forming material being melted in the melter and creating turbulent conditions in substantially all of the material; and
exhausting exhaust material from the melter through an exhaust structure fluidly connecting the exhaust passage with an exhaust stack, the exhaust structure comprising a barrier preventing the exhaust material from contacting the atmosphere, the barrier defining an exhaust chamber having an interior surface, the barrier configured to maintain temperature and pressure in the exhaust structure at values sufficient to substantially prevent the exhaust material from condensing on the interior surface.
A fourth aspect of the disclosure is a method of manufacturing glass comprising:
melting glass-forming materials in a submerged combustion melter, the melter comprising a floor, a roof, and a wall structure connecting the floor and roof, and an exhaust passage through the roof;
combusting a fuel in one or more submerged combustion burners mounted in the floor and/or wall structure, the submerged combustion burners discharging combustion products under a level of the glass-forming material being melted in the melter and creating turbulent conditions in substantially all of the material; and
exhausting exhaust material from the melter through an exhaust structure fluidly connecting the exhaust passage with an exhaust stack, wherein the exhaust passage is substantially centrally located between a feed end and an exit end of the melter, and the exhausting of the exhaust material through the exhaust structure comprises exhausting the exhaust material substantially centrally between the feed end and the exit end of the melter, wherein the exhaust structure comprises:
Systems and methods of the disclosure will become more apparent upon review of the brief description of the drawings, the detailed description of the disclosure, and the claims that follow.
The manner in which the objectives of the disclosure and other desirable characteristics can be obtained is explained in the following description and attached drawings in which:
It is to be noted, however, that
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the disclosed methods and systems for carrying out the methods. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the methods and systems may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the specifically described embodiments may be possible and are deemed within the claims or claimable subject matter in this or subsequent patents. All United States (U.S.) published patent applications and U.S. Patents referenced herein are hereby explicitly incorporated herein by reference. In the event definitions of terms in the referenced patents and applications conflict with how those terms are defined in the present application, the definitions for those terms that are provided in the present application shall be deemed controlling.
As explained briefly in the Background, current production of glass products using submerged combustion may utilize one or more conventional exhaust ports and such melters may suffer exhaust port plugging and/or reduced flow of exhaust, which may result in reduced or lost production, increased carryover of batch or cullet, and increased ejection of molten glass from the burners to the exhaust due to pulsation of combustion gases emanating from the burners. Such melters also frequently require a sump to catch debris falling off of the inside surfaces of the exhaust port.
Applicants have discovered that by eliminating the customary exhaust port or ports, substantially opening the top of the melter and creating a large volume exhaust area with a low exit flow velocity, prior to the exhaust gases passing to an exhaust duct system and an abatement system commonly used, and optionally locating the exhaust area properly between the feed inlet and molten glass discharge, carryover and ejection of molten glass may be drastically reduced, and in certain embodiments a sump may not be necessary, reducing capital and operating costs.
Various terms are used throughout this disclosure. “Submerged” as used herein means that combustion gases emanate from burners under the level of the molten glass; the burners may be floor-mounted, wall-mounted, or in melter embodiments comprising more than one submerged combustion burner, any combination thereof (for example, two floor mounted burners and one wall mounted burner).
As used herein the terms “combustion gases”, “combustion products” and “combustion flames” may be used interchangeably and mean substantially gaseous mixtures of any excess oxidant or fuel, oxides of carbon (such as carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide), oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, and water. Combustion products may include liquids and solids, for example soot and unburned liquid fuels. “Exhaust material” includes all materials exiting the melter through an exhaust structure, and includes combustion gases, batch and/or cullet carryover, ejected molten glass, inspirated air, and the like. The phrase “the barrier configured to maintain temperature and pressure in the exhaust structure at values sufficient to substantially prevent condensation of exhaust material on the interior surface” essentially means determining the species in the exhaust material most likely to condense and maintaining the temperature and pressure at levels that would substantially prevent that species from condensing. For example, if the species most likely to condense would condense at 1500° F. (815° C.) or lower temperature and/or pressure less than 1 atmosphere, then the temperature of the interior surface of the barrier would be maintained at temperature slightly higher than 1500° F. (for example 1520° C. (826° C.), or 1530° F. (832° C.), or higher) and pressure slightly above 1 atmosphere (for example, 1.1 atmosphere, 1.15 atmosphere, or higher).
The term “fuel”, according to this disclosure, means a combustible composition comprising a major portion of, for example, methane, natural gas, liquefied natural gas, propane, atomized oil or the like (either in gaseous or liquid form). Fuels useful in the disclosure may comprise minor amounts of non-fuels therein, including oxidants, for purposes such as premixing the fuel with the oxidant, or atomizing liquid fuels. As used herein the term “fuel” includes gaseous fuels, liquid fuels, flowable solids, such as powdered carbon or particulate material, waste materials, slurries, and mixtures or other combinations thereof. When the fuel comprises gaseous fuel, the gaseous fuel may be selected from the group consisting of methane, natural gas, liquefied natural gas, propane, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, steam-reformed natural gas, atomized oil or mixtures thereof.
“Oxidant” means air, or compositions comprising the same molar concentration of oxygen as air, while the term “oxygen” means a gas with an oxygen molar concentration of at least 50%. Such oxidants include oxygen-enriched air containing at least 50% vol., oxygen such as “industrially” pure oxygen (99.5%) produced by a cryogenic air separation plant or non-pure oxygen produced by an adsorption process or membrane permeation process (about 90% vol. oxygen or more). In all embodiments of the disclosure the sources of oxidant and fuel may be one or more conduits, pipelines, storage facility, cylinders, or, in embodiments where the oxidant is air, ambient air. Oxygen-enriched oxidants may be supplied from a pipeline, cylinder, storage facility, cryogenic air separation unit, membrane permeation separator, or adsorption unit such as a vacuum swing adsorption unit.
Submerged combustion melters useful in methods and systems of the present disclosure may be comprised of metal, ceramic, ceramic-lined metal, or combination thereof. Suitable metals include stainless steels, for example, but not limited to, 306 and 316 steel, as well as titanium alloys, aluminum alloys, carbon steel, and the like.
One aspect of the disclosure is a submerged combustion glass manufacturing system comprising a melter comprising a floor, a roof, and a wall structure connecting the floor and roof, and an exhaust passage through the roof; one or more submerged combustion burners mounted in the floor and/or wall structure, the submerged combustion burners configured to discharge combustion products under a level of material being melted in the melter and create turbulent conditions in substantially all of the material; and an exhaust structure fluidly connecting the exhaust passage with an exhaust stack, the exhaust structure comprising a barrier preventing exhaust material from contacting the atmosphere, the barrier defining an exhaust chamber having an interior surface, the exhaust chamber having a cross-sectional area greater than that of the exhaust stack but less than the melter, the barrier configured to maintain temperature and pressure in the exhaust structure at values sufficient to substantially prevent condensation of exhaust material on the interior surface. Certain submerged combustion glass manufacturing systems may comprise more than one exhaust passage through the roof, and more than one exhaust structure as described herein.
Certain systems of the present disclosure may comprise one or more feed inlets in a feed end of the wall structure, one or more molten glass outlets in an exit end of the wall structure, wherein the exhaust passage through the roof is positioned substantially centrally between the feed and exit ends.
In certain systems of the present disclosure the exhaust passage and exhaust chamber may have a cross-sectional area at least large enough to allow non-turbulent flow of exhaust gases in the exhaust material flowing through the passage and chamber.
In certain systems and methods the submerged combustion burners may be configured to discharge combustion products primarily non-laterally under the level of material being melted in the melter. In certain exemplary system and method embodiments the submerged combustion burners may be configured to discharge combustion products primarily vertically under the level of material being melted in the melter.
In certain systems the wall structure may comprise a feed end wall, an exit end wall, and two side walls, with each side wall connected to both the feed end wall and the exit end wall.
In certain systems of this disclosure the barrier of the exhaust structure may be constructed of materials selected from the group consisting of refractory, metal, and combinations thereof, with the proviso that if metal, the service temperature of the metal is higher than the temperature of the exhaust materials. Examples of suitable metals include, but are not limited to, carbon steel, stainless steels of various grades, Inconel, and the like.
Certain systems embodiments may comprise a fluid-cooled transition structure fluidly connecting the exhaust passage and the exhaust structure. In certain systems the fluid may be a liquid selected from the group consisting of water, organic liquids, inorganic liquids, and combinations thereof.
Certain systems may comprise an air inspirator fluidly connecting the barrier and the exhaust stack. In certain systems the air inspirator may comprise one or more adjustable panels. In certain embodiments the air inspirator may comprise a hood or hoods that may be raised or lowered, for example using rails, guides, jack-screws or other sub-system. Movement may be accomplished using manual or automatic control, and may use electronic, pneumatic, or hydraulic actuation.
In certain systems the barrier of the exhaust structure may have a cross-sectional shape selected from the group consisting of rectangular, round, oval, trapezoidal, triangular, U-shaped, quadrangular, hexagonal, octagonal, parabolic. The cross-sectional shape of the barrier may be the same or different than the cross-sectional shape of the melter.
In certain system embodiments the barrier of the exhaust structure may comprise a refractory lined metal layer wherein the refractory comprises the interior surface of the barrier, the metal layer having air-cooled surfaces that may also function as mechanical supports. The air-cooled surfaces may be fins, flow-through boxes, and the like, and may have channels, baffles, and other surfaces to increase or decrease heat transfer. In certain system embodiments the metal layer may be Inconel, and the air-cooled surfaces may be steel. The air-cooled surfaces or structures may be integral with the metal layer, or may be removably attached separate pieces, such as by bolted flange connections, welding, riveting, and similar attachment mechanisms.
Another aspect of this disclosure are methods comprising melting glass-forming materials in a submerged combustion melter, the melter comprising a floor, a roof, and a wall structure connecting the floor and roof, and an exhaust passage through the roof; combusting a fuel in one or more submerged combustion burners mounted in the floor and/or wall structure, the submerged combustion burners discharging combustion products under a level of the glass-forming material being melted in the melter and creating turbulent conditions in substantially all of the material; and exhausting exhaust material from the melter through an exhaust structure fluidly connecting the exhaust passage with an exhaust stack, the exhaust structure comprising a barrier preventing the exhaust material from contacting the atmosphere, the barrier defining an exhaust chamber having an interior surface, the barrier configured to maintain temperature and pressure in the exhaust structure at values sufficient to substantially prevent the exhaust material from condensing on the interior surface.
In certain methods the exhaust passage may be substantially centrally located between a feed end and an exit end of the melter, and the exhausting of the exhaust material through the exhaust structure comprises exhausting the exhaust material substantially centrally between the feed end and the exit end of the melter.
Certain method embodiments may comprise cooling the exhaust material prior to the exhaust chamber by flowing the exhaust material through a liquid-cooled transition structure fluidly connecting the exhaust passage and the barrier.
Certain method embodiments may comprise inspiring air into the exhaust material through an air inspirator fluidly connecting the barrier and the exhaust stack. Certain methods may comprise adjusting one or more panels of the air inspirator, or moving the air inspirator up or down to let more or less air into the stack.
In certain systems and methods at least some heat used for the melting may come from heat from combustion of at least some of the binder of glass mat and/or roving fed to the melter. In certain systems and methods the submerged combustion melter may be operated at a pressure less than atmospheric pressure. These systems and methods may ensure that any combustion products generated during melting remain in the system and do not escape through the feed inlet. These features are more fully described in assignee's co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/888,970, filed Sep. 23, 2010.
Certain system and method embodiments of this disclosure may include submerged combustion melters comprising fluid-cooled panels, such as described in assignee's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/817,754, filed Jun. 17, 2010.
In certain system and method embodiments, the submerged combustion melter may include one or more submerged combustion burners comprising one or more combustion burners such as described in assignee's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/268,028 filed Oct. 7, 2011.
Certain system and method embodiments of this disclosure may be controlled by one or more controllers. For example, burner combustion (flame) temperature may be controlled by monitoring one or more parameters selected from velocity of the fuel, velocity of the primary oxidant, mass and/or volume flow rate of the fuel, mass and/or volume flow rate of the primary oxidant, energy content of the fuel, temperature of the fuel as it enters the burner, temperature of the primary oxidant as it enters the burner, temperature of the effluent, pressure of the primary oxidant entering the burner, humidity of the oxidant, burner geometry, combustion ratio, and combinations thereof. Certain systems and processes of this disclosure may also measure and/or monitor feed rate of batch or other feed materials, such as glass mat or wound roving, mass of glass mat or wound roving per unit length, web or roving linear speed, and combinations thereof, and use these measurements for control purposes. Exemplary systems and methods of the disclosure may comprise a combustion controller which receives one or more input parameters selected from velocity of the fuel, velocity of the primary oxidant, mass and/or volume flow rate of the fuel, mass and/or volume flow rate of the primary oxidant, energy content of the fuel, temperature of the fuel as it enters the burner, temperature of the primary oxidant as it enters the burner, pressure of the oxidant entering the burner, humidity of the oxidant, burner geometry, oxidation ratio, temperature of the effluent and combinations thereof, and employs a control algorithm to control combustion temperature based on one or more of these input parameters.
Certain system and method embodiments may comprise using vibration and/or oscillation of the submerged combustion melter to predict melt viscosity and/or other properties of the initial melt emanating from the melter, as disclosed in assignee's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/268,065 filed Oct. 7, 2011.
Yet other systems and methods may employ a lance above the melt if the melt is foamy in the submerged combustion melter, as described in assignee's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/268,130 filed Oct. 7, 2011.
Referring now to the drawing figures,
In accordance with the present disclosure, system 100 illustrated in
An exhaust structure in embodiment 200 is defined by a front cooling panel 240A, back wall cooling panel 240B (not shown) and side wall cooling panels 228A and 228B (side wall cooling panel 228A not viewable in
Melter and system embodiments 100 and 200, as well as other melters, systems, and methods in accordance with the present disclosure, may process a full range of glass compositions and batch materials including commercial borosilicate and soda-lime glasses, as well as compositions for commercial mineral and stone wools. The melter dimensions and the number of submerged combustion burners may vary. The typical bubble (void) diameter in melt samples may be about 0.1 mm, but with time at temperatures, as is provided by a refractory lined channel or forehearth of varying length and depth, the small bubbles may coalesce and form larger voids that rise in the flowing molten glass and may be removed from the bulk glass. With enough time and temperature, the glass becomes “fined” to the state of a solid glass without voids. If foamed glass is desired, insulating foam glass depends on a significant void fraction to produce a closed cell, light-weight glass that has insulating properties. Glass produced from an SCM of this disclosure may have a significant closed cell void fraction that could be used as an insulating glass panel. Some modifications, such as described in assignee's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/267,990 filed Oct. 7, 2011, may be needed to control void fraction to a higher fraction (percentage) and to increase the average size of the voids from the typical 0.1 mm diameter to 1 mm or more.
Exhaust chambers, connectors, and transitions may have a wide variety of cross-sectional shapes, and the cross-sectional shape may be the same or different along the length (flow direction) of exhaust chambers, connectors, and transitions. The cross-sections may be rectangular (including square), round, oval, triangular, U-shaped (ends are U-shaped, with linear connecting walls), quadrangular (for example trapezoidal), hexagonal, octagonal, parabolic, and the like. The exhaust structure may have several different materials of construction. In certain embodiments it may be all refractory, but these embodiments are heavy and may require strong supporting steel structure. In other embodiments the exhaust structure may be all metal (for example Inconel for higher temperatures) but in these embodiments there may be a need for greater cooling to keep temperatures below the service limits of the metal. Finally, some embodiments may comprise a hybrid design including both refractory and metal, as in embodiments 100 and 200 described herein.
In retrofitting an existing melter, or constructing a new system, a hybrid system may avoid significant steel structural modifications. In embodiments 100 and 200, Inconel with a refractory liner and air cooling on the backside of the Inconel metal was used to ensure the metal stayed below 1500° F. (816° C.), the service temperature limit for the thickness of Inconel used. (As service temperature of the metal increases, metal thickness increases.) This has worked very well and does not take much air cooling of the Inconel. A key is keeping the exhaust gases hot enough so condensation does not occur and that the molten glass and other materials that get thrown up into the exhaust flows back down the interior surface of the barrier back into the melter. For some thicknesses of metal, water cooling gave too much cooling to accomplish what was desired, but this does not rule out liquids being used as heat transfer fluids.
In embodiment 200, the lower transition piece, which is not viewable in
Submerged combustion melters in embodiments described herein, except for the exhaust structure modifications and possible elimination of a sump, may be any of the currently known submerged combustion melter designs, or may be one of those described in assignee's currently pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/817,754, filed Jun. 17, 2010, incorporated herein by reference. Submerged combustion melters useful in the practice of the methods and systems of this disclosure may take any number of forms, including those described in assignee's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/817,754, which describes sidewalls forming an expanding melting zone formed by a first trapezoidal region, and a narrowing melting zone formed by a second trapezoidal region, wherein a common base between the trapezoids defines the location of the maximum width of the melter, as described herein with respect to embodiment 200 of
Submerged combustion melters may be fed a variety of feed materials by one or more roll stands, which in turn supports one or more rolls of glass mat, as described in assignee's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/888,970 filed Sep. 23, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,650,914, issued Feb. 14, 2014 incorporated herein by reference. In certain embodiments powered nip rolls may include cutting knives or other cutting components to cut or chop the mat (or roving, in those embodiments processing roving) into smaller length pieces prior to entering the melter. Also provided in certain embodiments is a glass batch feeder. Glass batch feeders are well-known in this art and require no further explanation.
Embodiment 400 of
In accordance with the present disclosure, embodiment 400 comprises one or more roll stands 414 (only one being illustrated), which in turn supports one or more rolls 416 of glass mat. Roll stand 414 connects to roll 416 though an unwind driver and brake combination 415, which are known in the roll-handling art. Roll stand 414 is supported by a plant floor 410′, which may be the same or different floor as floor 410 which supports melter 402 (in other words, roll stand 414 may be supported by a second floor of a plant or facility, although this is not necessary to practice the methods and apparatus of this disclosure).
Other components of embodiment 400 include a glass mat forming device 421, a set of powered nip rolls 424, and a glass mat feed slot 426. In certain embodiments, as mentioned previously, powered nip rolls 424 may be supplemented with or replaced by a nip compression conveyor, or opposed conveyors compressing the product to accomplish the same aim. Forming device 421 is optional, but when present, may be selected from any one or more devices providing one or more functions, for example, but not limited to cutting, slitting (cutting in longitudinal direction), folding, shaping, compacting, pressing, coating, spraying, heating, cooling, and the like, and combinations thereof. An example of a single device providing two functions would be a device providing both heating and folding. The powered nip rolls 424 may also provide some degree of heating, cooling, compressing, and other forming function or functions, although their primary function is to draw the glass mat web off of roll 416, in conjunction with unwind driver/brake combination 415. In certain embodiments, as mentioned previously, the powered nip rolls may include cutting knives or other cutting components to cut or chop the mat (or roving, in those embodiments processing rovings) into smaller length pieces prior to entering melter 402.
In operation of embodiment 400 of
In embodiment 400, melter exhaust chute 412 includes feed slot 426 positioned as illustrated, and feed glass mat 422 (or wound roving) is fed through feed slot 426 and exhaust chute 412, as illustrated. A baffle plate 435 is positioned as illustrated as an extension from melter roof 403, extending at least partially between the exhaust passage and melt 404 (material being melted in melter 402). A dashed, phantom portion of feed slot 426 is illustrated as an extension, which may be present in certain embodiments to ensure that glass mat web 422 enters molten glass 404 in a desired location. Any location is possible, but for the limitation that glass mat is molten before leaving molten glass outlet 428. Also provided in this embodiment is a glass batch feeder 432.
Certain embodiments may comprise a process control scheme for the submerged combustion melter and burners. For example, as explained in the '970 application, a master process controller may be configured to provide any number of control logics, including feedback control, feed-forward control, cascade control, and the like. The disclosure is not limited to a single master process controller, as any combination of controllers could be used. The term “control”, used as a transitive verb, means to verify or regulate by comparing with a standard or desired value. Control may be closed loop, feedback, feed-forward, cascade, model predictive, adaptive, heuristic and combinations thereof. The term “controller” means a device at least capable of accepting input from sensors and meters in real time or near-real time, and sending commands directly to burner control elements, and/or to local devices associated with burner control elements and feeding devices able to accept commands. A controller may also be capable of accepting input from human operators; accessing databases, such as relational databases; sending data to and accessing data in databases, data warehouses or data marts; and sending information to and accepting input from a display device readable by a human. A controller may also interface with or have integrated therewith one or more software application modules, and may supervise interaction between databases and one or more software application modules. The controller may utilize Model Predictive Control (MPC) or other advanced multivariable control methods used in multiple input/multiple output (MIMO) systems.
As mentioned previously, the methods of assignee's co-pending application using the vibrations and oscillations of the melter itself, may prove useful predictive control inputs. Measurement of vibration is a well-developed science in its own right and requires little explanation to the skilled vibration sensor artisan. A good summary is provided by Furman, B. J., “Vibration Measurement”, San Jose State University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, pp. 1-14, 22 Nov. 2005, incorporated herein by reference. Furman described vibration as interchange between potential and kinetic energy in bodies with finite stiffness and mass that arises from time dependent energy input, and gives examples, including fluid flow. Without being limited to any particular theory, the inventors herein theorize that the oxidant and/or fuel fluid flows through submerged combustion burners, and the flames and combustion products emanating from those burners, contribute to the vibration and/or oscillation observed in submerged combustion glass tank furnaces. Basic parameters of vibration study, such as amplitude, amplitude peak level, peak-to-peak amplitude, root-mean-square (RMS) amplitude level, and average (rectified) amplitude, are given schematically in Furman. See also assignee's co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/268,065.
Those having ordinary skill in this art will appreciate that there are many possible variations of the melter, exhaust structures, forehearths, burners, and heat transfer components described herein, and will be able to devise alternatives and improvements to those described herein that are nevertheless considered to be within the claims of the present patent.
Burners useful in the melter apparatus described herein include those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,539,034; 3,170,781; 3,237,929; 3,260,587; 3,606,825; 3,627,504; 3,738,792; 3,764,287; and 7,273,583, and assignee's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/268,068 filed Oct. 7, 2011. One useful burner, for example, is described in the '583 patent as comprising a method and apparatus providing heat energy to a bath of molten material and simultaneously creating a well-mixed molten material. The burner functions by firing a burning gaseous or liquid fuel-oxidant mixture into a volume of molten material. The burners described in the '583 patent provide a stable flame at the point of injection of the fuel-oxidant mixture into the melt to prevent the formation of frozen melt downstream as well as to prevent any resultant explosive combustion; constant, reliable, and rapid ignition of the fuel-oxidant mixture such that the mixture burns quickly inside the molten material and releases the heat of combustion into the melt; and completion of the combustion process in bubbles rising to the surface of the melt. In one embodiment, the burners described in the '583 patent comprises an inner fluid supply tube having a first fluid inlet end and a first fluid outlet end and an outer fluid supply tube having a second fluid inlet end and a second fluid outlet end coaxially disposed around the inner fluid supply tube and forming an annular space between the inner fluid supply tube and the outer fluid supply tube. A burner nozzle is connected to the first fluid outlet end of the inner fluid supply tube. The outer fluid supply tube is arranged such that the second fluid outlet end extends beyond the first fluid outlet end, creating, in effect, a combustion space or chamber bounded by the outlet to the burner nozzle and the extended portion of the outer fluid supply tube. The burner nozzle is sized with an outside diameter corresponding to the inside diameter of the outer fluid supply tube and forms a centralized opening in fluid communication with the inner fluid supply tube and at least one peripheral longitudinally oriented opening in fluid communication with the annular space between the inner and outer fluid supply tubes. In certain embodiments, a longitudinally adjustable rod is disposed within the inner fluid supply tube having one end proximate the first fluid outlet end. As the adjustable rod is moved within the inner fluid supply tube, the flow characteristics of fluid through the inner fluid supply tube are modified. A cylindrical flame stabilizer element is attached to the second fluid outlet end. The stable flame is achieved by supplying oxidant to the combustion chamber through one or more of the openings located on the periphery of the burner nozzle, supplying fuel through the centralized opening of the burner nozzle, and controlling the development of a self-controlled flow disturbance zone by freezing melt on the top of the cylindrical flame stabilizer element. The location of the injection point for the fuel-oxidant mixture below the surface of the melting material enhances mixing of the components being melted and increases homogeneity of the melt. Thermal NOx emissions are greatly reduced due to the lower flame temperatures resulting from the melt-quenched flame and further due to insulation of the high temperature flame from the atmosphere.
In certain embodiments the burners may be floor-mounted burners. In certain embodiments, the burners may be positioned in rows substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis (in the melt flow direction) of the melter. In certain embodiments, the burners may be positioned to emit combustion products into molten glass in a melting zone of the melter in a fashion so that the gases penetrate the melt generally perpendicularly to the floor. In other embodiments, one or more burners may emit combustion products into the melt at an angle to the floor, as taught in assignee's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/817,754.
Submerged combustion melters useful in systems and methods in accordance with the present disclosure may also comprise one or more wall-mounted submerged combustion burners, and/or one or more roof-mounted burners. Roof-mounted burners may be useful to pre-heat the melting zone of the melter, and may serve as ignition sources for one or more submerged combustion burners. Melters having only wall-mounted, submerged-combustion burners are also considered within the present disclosure. Roof-mounted burners may be oxy-fuel burners, but as they are only used in certain situations, are more likely to be air/fuel burners. Most often they would be shut-off after pre-heating the melter and/or after starting one or more submerged combustion burners. In certain embodiments, if there is a possibility of carryover of particles to the exhaust, one or more roof-mounted burners could be used to form a curtain to prevent particulate carryover. In certain embodiments, all submerged combustion burners are oxy/fuel burners (where “oxy” means oxygen, or oxygen-enriched air, as described earlier), but this is not necessarily so in all embodiments; some or all of the submerged combustion burners may be air/fuel burners. Furthermore, heating may be supplemented by electrical heating in certain melter embodiments, in certain melter zones, in forehearths, and so on. In certain embodiments the oxy-fuel burners may comprise one or more submerged combustion burners each having co-axial fuel and oxidant tubes forming an annular space therebetween, wherein the outer tube extends beyond the end of the inner tube, as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 7,273,583, incorporated herein by reference. Burners may be flush-mounted with the melter floor in certain embodiments. In other embodiments, such as disclosed in the '583 patent, a portion of one or more of the burners may extend slightly into the melt above the melter floor.
In certain embodiments, melter side walls may have a free-flowing form, devoid of angles. In certain other embodiments, side walls may be configured so that an intermediate location may comprise an intermediate region of the melter having constant width, extending from a first trapezoidal region to the beginning of a narrowing melting region. Other embodiments of suitable melters are described in the above-mentioned '754 application.
As mentioned herein, useful melters may include refractory fluid-cooled panels. Liquid-cooled panels may be used, having one or more conduits or tubing therein, supplied with liquid through one conduit, with another conduit discharging warmed liquid, routing heat transferred from inside the melter to the liquid away from the melter. Liquid-cooled panels may also include a thin refractory liner, which minimizes heat losses from the melter, but allows formation of a thin frozen glass shell to form on the surfaces and prevent any refractory wear and associated glass contamination. Other useful cooled panels include air-cooled panels, comprising a conduit that has a first, small diameter section, and a large diameter section. Warmed air transverses the conduits such that the conduit having the larger diameter accommodates expansion of the air as it is warmed. Air-cooled panels are described more fully in U.S. Pat. No. 6,244,197. In certain embodiments, the refractory fluid cooled-panels are cooled by a heat transfer fluid selected from the group consisting of gaseous, liquid, or combinations of gaseous and liquid compositions that functions or is capable of being modified to function as a heat transfer fluid. Gaseous heat transfer fluids may be selected from air, including ambient air and treated air (for air treated to remove moisture), inert inorganic gases, such as nitrogen, argon, and helium, inert organic gases such as fluoro-, chloro- and chlorofluorocarbons, including perfluorinated versions, such as tetrafluoromethane, and hexafluoroethane, and tetrafluoroethylene, and the like, and mixtures of inert gases with small portions of non-inert gases, such as hydrogen. Heat transfer liquids may be selected from inert liquids which may be organic, inorganic, or some combination thereof, for example, salt solutions, glycol solutions, oils and the like. Other possible heat transfer fluids include steam (if cooler than the melt temperature), carbon dioxide, or mixtures thereof with nitrogen. Heat transfer fluids may be compositions comprising both gas and liquid phases, such as the higher chlorofluorocarbons.
Melters and channels described herein may be constructed using cast concretes such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,323,718. Two cast concrete layers are described in the 718 patent, the first being a hydraulically setting insulating composition (for example, that known under the trade designation CASTABLE BLOC-MIX-G, a product of Fleischmann Company, Frankfurt/Main, Federal Republic of Germany). This composition may be poured in a form of a wall section of desired thickness, for example a layer 5 cm thick, or 10 cm, or greater. This material is allowed to set, followed by a second layer of a hydraulically setting refractory casting composition (such as that known under the trade designation RAPID BLOCK RG 158, a product of Fleischmann company, Frankfurt/Main, Federal Republic of Germany) may be applied thereonto. Other suitable materials for the refractory cooled panels, melter and channel refractory liners, and refractory block burners (if used) are fused zirconia (ZrO2), fused cast AZS (alumina-zirconia-silica), rebonded AZS, or fused cast alumina (Al2O3). The choice of a particular material is dictated among other parameters by the melter geometry and type of glass to be produced.
The total quantities of fuel and oxidant used by the combustion system may be such that the flow of oxygen may range from about 0.9 to about 1.2 of the theoretical stoichiometric flow of oxygen necessary to obtain the complete combustion of the fuel flow. Another expression of this statement is that the combustion ratio may range from about 0.9 to about 1.2. In certain embodiments, the equivalent fuel content of the feed material must be taken into account. For example, organic binders in glass fiber mat scrap materials will increase the oxidant requirement above that required strictly for fuel being combusted. In consideration of these embodiments, the combustion ratio may be increased above 1.2, for example to 1.5, or to 2, or 2.5, or even higher, depending on the organic content of the feed materials.
The velocity of the fuel gas in the various burners depends on the burner geometry used, but generally is at least about 15 m/s. The upper limit of fuel velocity depends primarily on the desired mixing of the melt in the melter apparatus, melter geometry, and the geometry of the burner; if the fuel velocity is too low, the flame temperature may be too low, providing inadequate melting, which is not desired, and if the fuel flow is too high, flame might impinge on the melter floor, roof or wall, and/or heat will be wasted, which is also not desired.
Another method of this disclosure is presented in the logic diagram of
The term “control”, used as a transitive verb, means to verify or regulate by comparing with a standard or desired value. Control may be closed loop, feedback, feed-forward, cascade, model predictive, adaptive, heuristic and combinations thereof. The term “controller” means a device at least capable of accepting input from sensors and meters in real time or near-real time, and sending commands directly to burner control elements, and/or to local devices associated with burner control elements able to accept commands. A controller may also be capable of accepting input from human operators; accessing databases, such as relational databases; sending data to and accessing data in databases, data warehouses or data marts; and sending information to and accepting input from a display device readable by a human. A controller may also interface with or have integrated therewith one or more software application modules, and may supervise interaction between databases and one or more software application modules.
The phrase “PID controller” means a controller using proportional, integral, and derivative features. In some cases the derivative mode may not be used or its influence reduced significantly so that the controller may be deemed a PI controller. It will also be recognized by those of skill in the control art that there are existing variations of PI and PID controllers, depending on how the discretization is performed. These known and foreseeable variations of PI, PID and other controllers are considered within the disclosure.
The controller may utilize Model Predictive Control (MPC). MPC is an advanced multivariable control method for use in multiple input/multiple output (MIMO) systems. MPC computes a sequence of manipulated variable adjustments in order to optimise the future behavior of the process in question. At each control time k, MPC solves a dynamic optimization problem using a model of the controlled system, so as to optimize future behavior (at time k+1, k+2 . . . k+n) over a prediction horizon n. This is again performed at time k+1, k+2 . . . . MPC may use any derived objective function, such as Quadratic Performance Objective, and the like, including weighting functions of manipulated variables and measurements. Dynamics of the process and/or system to be controlled are described in an explicit model of the process and/or system, which may be obtained for example by mathematical modeling, or estimated from test data of the real process and/or system. Some techniques to determine some of the dynamics of the system and/or process to be controlled include step response models, impulse response models, and other linear or non-linear models. Often an accurate model is not necessary. Input and output constraints may be included in the problem formulation so that future constraint violations are anticipated and prevented, such as hard constraints, soft constraints, set point constraints, funnel constraints, return on capital constraints, and the like. It may be difficult to explicitly state stability of an MPC control scheme, and in certain embodiments of the present disclosure it may be necessary to use nonlinear MPC. In so-called advanced control of various systems, PID control may be used on strong mono-variable loops with few or nonproblematic interactions, while one or more networks of MPC might be used, or other multivariable control structures, for strong interconnected loops. Furthermore, computing time considerations may be a limiting factor. Some embodiments may employ nonlinear MPC.
A feed forward algorithm, if used, will in the most general sense be task specific, meaning that it will be specially designed to the task it is designed to solve. This specific design might be difficult to design, but a lot is gained by using a more general algorithm, such as a first or second order filter with a given gain and time constants.
Although only a few exemplary embodiments of this disclosure have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this disclosure. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the following claims. In the claims, no clauses are intended to be in the means-plus-function format allowed by 35 U.S.C. §112, paragraph 6 unless “means for” is explicitly recited together with an associated function. “Means for” clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents, but also equivalent structures.
This application is a continuation of pending U.S. application Ser. No. 14/208,029, filed Mar. 13, 2014, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/268,098, filed Oct. 7, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,707,740 issued Apr. 29, 2014, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1716433 | Ellis | Jun 1929 | A |
2174533 | See et al. | Oct 1939 | A |
2118479 | McCaskey | Jan 1940 | A |
2269459 | Kleist | Jan 1942 | A |
2432942 | See et al. | Dec 1947 | A |
2455907 | Slayter | Jan 1948 | A |
2679749 | Poole | Jun 1954 | A |
2718096 | Henry et al. | Sep 1955 | A |
2773545 | Petersen | Dec 1956 | A |
2781756 | Kobe | Feb 1957 | A |
2878644 | Fenn | Mar 1959 | A |
2890166 | Heinze | Jun 1959 | A |
2902029 | Hill | Sep 1959 | A |
2981250 | Stewart | Apr 1961 | A |
3020165 | Davis | Feb 1962 | A |
3056283 | Tiede | Oct 1962 | A |
3073683 | Switzer et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3084392 | Labino | Apr 1963 | A |
3088812 | Bitterlich et al. | May 1963 | A |
3104947 | Switzer et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
3160578 | Saxton et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3165452 | Williams | Jan 1965 | A |
3170781 | Keefer | Feb 1965 | A |
3174820 | See et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3215189 | Bauer | Nov 1965 | A |
3224855 | Plumat | Dec 1965 | A |
3237929 | Plumat et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3241548 | See et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3248205 | Dolf et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3260587 | Dolf et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3268313 | Burgman et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3285834 | Guerrieri et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3294512 | Penberthy | Dec 1966 | A |
3325298 | Brown | Jun 1967 | A |
3385686 | Plumat et al. | May 1968 | A |
3402025 | Garrett et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
3407805 | Bougard | Oct 1968 | A |
3407862 | Mustian, Jr. | Oct 1968 | A |
3421873 | Burgman et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3432399 | Schutt | Mar 1969 | A |
3442633 | Perry | May 1969 | A |
3445214 | Oremesher | May 1969 | A |
3498779 | Hathaway | Mar 1970 | A |
3510393 | Burgman et al. | May 1970 | A |
3525674 | Barnebey | Aug 1970 | A |
3533770 | Adler et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3563683 | Hess | Feb 1971 | A |
3592151 | Webber | Jul 1971 | A |
3592623 | Shepherd | Jul 1971 | A |
3606825 | Johnson | Sep 1971 | A |
3617234 | Hawkins et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3627504 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3692017 | Glachant et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3717139 | Guillet et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3738792 | Feng | Jun 1973 | A |
3746527 | Knavish et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3747588 | Booth | Jul 1973 | A |
3754879 | Phaneuf | Aug 1973 | A |
3756800 | Phaneuf | Sep 1973 | A |
3763915 | Perry et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3764287 | Brocious | Oct 1973 | A |
3771988 | Starr | Nov 1973 | A |
3818893 | Kataoka et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3835909 | Douglas et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3840002 | Douglas et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3856496 | Nesbitt et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3885945 | Rees et al. | May 1975 | A |
3907585 | Francel et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3913560 | Lazarre et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3951635 | Rough | Apr 1976 | A |
3976464 | Wardlaw | Aug 1976 | A |
4001001 | Knavish et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4004903 | Daman et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4083711 | Jensen | Apr 1978 | A |
4110098 | Mattmuller | Aug 1978 | A |
4153438 | Stream | May 1979 | A |
4185982 | Schwenninger | Jan 1980 | A |
4203761 | Rose | May 1980 | A |
4205966 | Horikawa | Jun 1980 | A |
4208201 | Rueck | Jun 1980 | A |
4226564 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4238226 | Sanzenbacher et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4249927 | Fakuzaki et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4270740 | Sanzenbacher et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4282023 | Hammel et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4303435 | Sleighter | Dec 1981 | A |
4323718 | Buhring et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4349376 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4406683 | Demarest | Sep 1983 | A |
4413882 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4488537 | Laurent | Dec 1984 | A |
4539034 | Hanneken | Sep 1985 | A |
4542106 | Sproull | Sep 1985 | A |
4545800 | Won et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4626199 | Bounini | Dec 1986 | A |
4632687 | Kunkle et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4634461 | Demarest, Jr. et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4657586 | Masterson et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4735642 | Jensen et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4738938 | Kunkle et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4758259 | Jensen | Jul 1988 | A |
4798616 | Knavish et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4814387 | Donat | Mar 1989 | A |
4816056 | Tsai et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4877436 | Sheinkop | Oct 1989 | A |
4882736 | Pieper | Nov 1989 | A |
4919700 | Pecoraro et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4927886 | Backderf et al. | May 1990 | A |
4953376 | Merlone | Sep 1990 | A |
4969942 | Schwenninger | Nov 1990 | A |
5032230 | Shepherd | Jul 1991 | A |
5052874 | Johanson | Oct 1991 | A |
5062789 | Gitman | Nov 1991 | A |
5097802 | Clawson | Mar 1992 | A |
5168109 | Backderf et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5169424 | Grinnen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5199866 | Joshi et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5204082 | Schendel | Apr 1993 | A |
5299929 | Yap | Apr 1994 | A |
5360171 | Yap | Nov 1994 | A |
5374595 | Dumbaugh et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5405082 | Brown et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5449286 | Snyder et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5483548 | Coble | Jan 1996 | A |
5490775 | Joshi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5522721 | Drogue et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5545031 | Joshi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5575637 | Slavejkov et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5595703 | Swaelens et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606965 | Panz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613994 | Muniz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615668 | Panz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5636623 | Panz et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5672827 | Jursich | Sep 1997 | A |
5713668 | Lunghofer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718741 | Hull et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5736476 | Warzke et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743723 | Iatrides et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5765964 | Calcote et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5814121 | Travis | Sep 1998 | A |
5829962 | Drasek et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833447 | Bodelin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849058 | Takeshita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5863195 | Feldermann | Jan 1999 | A |
5944864 | Hull et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954498 | Joshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5975886 | Philippe | Nov 1999 | A |
5979191 | Jian | Nov 1999 | A |
5984667 | Philippe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993203 | Koppang | Nov 1999 | A |
6029910 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039787 | Edlinger | Mar 2000 | A |
6045353 | VonDrasek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068468 | Philippe et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071116 | Philippe et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074197 | Philippe | Jun 2000 | A |
6077072 | Marin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085551 | Pieper et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6109062 | Richards | Aug 2000 | A |
6113389 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6116896 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120889 | Turner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123542 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126438 | Joshi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154481 | Sorg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156285 | Adams et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171100 | Joshi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183848 | Turner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210151 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6210703 | Novich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237369 | LeBlanc et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241514 | Joshi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244197 | Coble | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244857 | VonDrasek et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247315 | Marin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250136 | Igreja | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250916 | Philippe et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6274164 | Novich | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276924 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276928 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293277 | Panz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314760 | Chenoweth | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314896 | Marin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6338337 | Panz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344747 | Lunghofer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357264 | Richards | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6386271 | Kawamoto et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418755 | Chenoweth | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6422041 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454562 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460376 | Jeanvoine et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6536651 | Ezumi et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6558606 | Kulkarni et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6660106 | Babel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6694791 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701617 | Li et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705118 | Simpson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708527 | Ibarlucea et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711942 | Getman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715319 | Barrow et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6722161 | LeBlanc | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736129 | Smith | May 2004 | B1 |
6739152 | Jeanvoine et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6796147 | Borysowicz et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797351 | Kulkarni et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6854290 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857999 | Jeanvoine | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6883349 | Jeanvoine | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6918256 | Gutmark et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7027467 | Baev et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7116888 | Aitken et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7134300 | Hayes et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7168395 | Engdahl | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7231788 | Karetta et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7273583 | Rue et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7330634 | Aitken et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7383698 | Ichinose et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392668 | Adams et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7428827 | Maugendre et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7441686 | Odajima et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7448231 | Jeanvoine et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454925 | DeAngelis et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7509819 | Baker et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7565819 | Jeanvoine et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7578988 | Jacques et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7581948 | Borders et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7622677 | Barberree et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624595 | Jeanvoine et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7748592 | Koga et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7767606 | McGinnis et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778290 | Sacks et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7781562 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7802452 | Borders et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7832365 | Hannum et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845314 | Smith | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855267 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20020086077 | Noller et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020134112 | Barrow et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152770 | Becher et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162358 | Jeanvoine et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020166343 | LeBlanc | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030015000 | Hayes et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029197 | Jeanvoine et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037571 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040131988 | Baker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168474 | Jeanvoine et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224833 | Jeanvoine et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050039491 | Maugendre et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050103323 | Engdahl | May 2005 | A1 |
20060000239 | Jeanvoine et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060174655 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060233512 | Aitken et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257097 | Aitken et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287482 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293494 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293495 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070106054 | Crawford et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122332 | Jacques et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130994 | Boratav et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070212546 | Jeanvoine et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220922 | Bauer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080035078 | Li | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080227615 | McGinnis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256981 | Jacques et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276652 | Bauer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293857 | Crawford et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090042709 | Jeanvoine et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090176639 | Jacques et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090220899 | Spangelo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100064732 | Jeanvoine et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087574 | Crawford et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089383 | Cowles | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100120979 | Crawford et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100143601 | Hawtof et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100227971 | Crawford et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236323 | D'Angelico et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100300153 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100307196 | Richardson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326137 | Rouchy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110054091 | Crawford et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061642 | Rouchy et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110088432 | Purnode et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107670 | Galley et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110236846 | Rue et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
196 19 919 | Aug 1997 | DE |
100 29 983 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10 2005 033330 | Aug 2006 | DE |
0 181 248 | Oct 1989 | EP |
1 337 789 | Dec 2004 | EP |
2 133 315 | Dec 2009 | EP |
1 986 966 | Apr 2010 | EP |
1 667 934 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2 740 860 | Sep 1997 | FR |
191301772 | Jan 1914 | GB |
191407633 | Jan 1914 | GB |
164073 | May 1921 | GB |
1208172 | Jul 1989 | IT |
114827 | Jul 1999 | RO |
9855411 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2008103291 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009091558 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010011701 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010045196 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Higley, BA, Glass Melter System Technologies for Vitrification of High-Sodium-Content Low-Level, Radioactive, Liquid Wastes—Phase I: SBS Demonstration With Simulated Low-Level Waste—Final Test Report, Westinghouse Hanford Company. |
Report for Treating Hanford LAW and WTP SW Simulants: Pilot Plan Mineralizing Flowsheet Apr. 2009, Department of Energy Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center by THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC. |
“Glass Technologies—The Legacy of a Successful Public-Private Partnership”, 2007, U.S. Department of Energy, pp. 1-32. |
“Glass Melting Technology—A Technical and Economic Assessment,” 2004, U.S. Department of Energy, pp. 1-292. |
Rue, “Energy-Efficient Glass Melting—The Next Generation Melter”, Gas Technology Institute, Project No. 20621 Final Report (2008). |
“Glass Industry of the Future”, United States Department of Energy, report 02-GA50113-03, pp. 1-17, Sep. 30, 2008. |
Olabin, V.M. et al., “Submerged Combustion Furnace for Glass Melts,” Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Jan. 1, 1996, pp. 84-92, vol. 17—No. 2, American Ceramic Society Inc., US. |
Furman, BJ, ME 120 Experimental Methods Vibration Measurement, San Jose University Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150344343 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13268098 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 14208029 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14208029 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 14813531 | US |