1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to membrane filtration systems and, more particularly, to submerged membrane filtration systems and their operation.
2. Discussion of Related Art
Submerged membrane filtration process with air scrubbing emerged in the 1980's. The driving force for filtration by suction or static head instead of pressurization was the elimination of the need for a pressure vessel to contain membrane modules, resulting in significant savings on the capital expense of a membrane filtration system. The gas/air consumption, required to scrub the membranes, however, was found to be a dominant portion in operating energy used in such a filtration process which resulted in high than expected operating costs. Consequently, efforts have been undertaken to reduce the gas/air consumption since the introduction of such systems.
There have been two main directions followed: a) improving the membranes' property with low fouling rate and high permeability; and b) improving the filtration/cleaning process.
Several factors can influence the scrubbing efficacy of a membrane to improve the cleaning process. Air could be more efficiently used by re-arranging modules to have a smaller footprint. In this way the amount of air could be concentrated to more efficiently scour the membranes. The use of high packing density modules also saves air consumption per membrane area. Intermittently scouring membranes with air instead of continuous injection is another way to save air consumption.
Another technique uses a mixture of gas and liquid to scrub the membrane. This method is may be advantageous in membrane bioreactor applications where the membrane filters mixed liquor containing a high concentration of suspended solids and a recirculation of mixed liquor is required to achieve denitrification. This method exploits a mixed liquor recirculation flow to scrub the membranes with air, to minimize the solid concentration polarization near the membrane surface and to prevent the dehydration of mixed liquor. The design of the membrane module aims to achieve a uniform distribution of the two-phase mixture into the membrane bundles. Membranes in known modules are typically either freely exposed to the feed or restricted in a perforated cage. Therefore there is still a certain loss of energy during the fluid transfer along the modules.
In the early stage of membrane process development, cross-flow filtration was commonly used, where a shear force was created by pumping a high velocity of feed across the membrane surface. Because more energy is required to create a high shear force to effectively clean the membrane, the application of the cross-flow filtration process is now limited, mainly to tubular membrane filtration applications.
The invention is directed to filtration systems and techniques of operation thereof.
In accordance with some aspects of the invention, the filtration system can be a membrane filtration system comprising a vessel having an inlet fluidly connectable to a source of a liquid having solids suspended therein, a membrane module disposed in the vessel, the membrane module comprising a shell at least partially enclosing a plurality of hollow fiber membranes and at least one scouring port disposed to introduce a scouring fluid comprising a gas, a liquid, or a mixture thereof to the fiber membranes.
In accordance with further aspects of the invention, the filtration system can be directed to a membrane module comprising a plurality of fiber membranes, means for introducing a scouring fluid to the plurality of fiber membranes, and means for retaining the scouring fluid adjacent the plurality of fiber membranes.
Still further aspects of the invention relate to treating or purifying water or a liquid having solids suspended therein. In such aspects, some embodiments of the invention can involve a method of purifying water having solids suspended therein. The method can comprise one or more acts or steps of introducing the water to a membrane module comprising a shell surrounding a plurality of hollow fiber membranes, the shell having a retentate exit port disposed adjacent to at least one of a lower potting head and an upper potting head, introducing a scouring fluid into a volume enclosed by the shell, the scouring fluid comprising a gas, a liquid, or a mixture thereof, and withdrawing permeate through the hollow fiber membranes to produce purified water.
According to some aspects, the present invention provides a membrane filtration module having a plurality of permeable, hollow membranes mounted therein, wherein, in use, a pressure differential is applied across the walls of the permeable, hollow membranes immersed in a liquid suspension containing suspended solids, said liquid suspension being applied to one surface of the permeable, hollow membranes to induce and sustain filtration through the membrane walls. Some of the liquid suspension passes through the walls of the membranes to be drawn off as clarified liquid or permeate, and at least some of the solids are retained on or in the permeable, hollow membranes or otherwise as suspended solids within the liquid suspension, the module including a fluid retaining means at least partially surrounding the membrane module for substantially retaining at least part of fluid flowed into the membrane module.
According to other aspects, the present invention provides a method of filtering solids from a liquid suspension using a plurality of permeable, hollow membranes mounted in a membrane module. The method can comprise acts or steps of flowing a fluid containing said liquid suspension into said membrane module such that said liquid suspension is applied to one surface of the permeable, hollow membranes; applying a pressure differential across the walls of the permeable, hollow membranes immersed in the liquid suspension containing suspended solids to induce and sustain filtration through the membrane walls wherein some of the liquid suspension passes through the walls of the membranes to be drawn off as clarified liquid or permeate, and at least some of the solids are retained on or in the permeable, hollow membranes or otherwise as suspended solids within the liquid suspension, and substantially retaining at least part of the fluid flowed into the membrane module by at least partially surrounding the membrane module with a fluid retaining means.
The accompanying drawings, are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing. In the drawings:
a is a schematic illustration showing a simplified sectional side elevation view of membrane module configuration according to an embodiment of the invention;
b is a schematic illustration showing a sectional side elevation view of a membrane module configuration having a screen;
c is a schematic illustration showing a sectional side elevation view of a known membrane module configuration without restraint around the fiber membranes;
a, 2b, 2c, 2d, and 2e are schematic illustrations showing perspective views of membrane module configurations according to one or more embodiments of the invention;
This invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having,” “containing”, “involving”, and variations thereof herein, is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
Some aspects of the invention are directed to immersed membrane separation systems and techniques. Particular embodiments of the invention are directed to preventing, inhibiting, or at least reducing any phenomena or limitations associated with concentration polarization, fouling, and particulate plugging of membrane filtration systems. The systems of the invention can reduce the need, or frequency, for cleaning techniques, such as those involving backwashing, chemical cleaning or washing, and/or air scouring.
The configurations and techniques of the invention can advantageously modify typical air scouring subsystems and assemblies used to effect cleaning of filtration components. Some aspects of the invention directed to one or more such subsystems can advantageously improve the overall effectiveness of membrane filtration systems by reducing any one or more of the size of membrane filtration systems, the effective throughput or processing capacity of filtration systems, and/or the reliability of filtration systems. The configurations and techniques of the invention further can also improve overall membrane filtration system operational efficiencies by, inter alia, reducing the operating loads thereof by, for example, reducing the energy requirements associated with the scouring or cleaning subsystems thereof.
Some aspects of the invention relate to scouring the fiber membranes. Scouring can be affected with one or more scouring fluids that facilitate removal of any solids in or on the membranes. The scouring fluid can comprise a gas with at least some of the liquid suspension. Preferred arrangements can be directed to those wherein the fluid also includes gas and/or a gas/liquid mixture.
Furthermore, scouring can be performed cyclically, intermittently, or continuously, to also facilitate mixing the immersion liquid within the tank by generating flow currents and eddies that aid in improving membrane flux. However, some scouring systems and techniques require slack or flexibility in the membranes but such movement can result in membrane breakage which results in a loss of system integrity. Once a membrane breaks, a costly replacement or repair process is required. The invention discloses arrangements, configurations, and techniques that can reduce such undesirable incidents. Further, effective scouring in immersed systems typically requires complex and costly baffle arrangement and air flow directional and positioning control features because scouring must occur throughout the membrane module, and because undirected air bubbles will tend to seek open volumes, rather than push themselves against the membranes to effect cleaning activity. The systems and techniques of the invention can further improve one or more features thereof by enhancing the effect of scouring when, for example, utilized or adapted to systems containing high solids content that typically have vertically oriented modules because bubbles in such systems tend to run up along the membranes during scouring. However, the invention is not limited to such configurations and may be practiced in systems that involve, for example, horizontally disposed modules as well as modules configured with fiber bundles looped to have ends potted in a common header. Permeate can be withdrawn through one or more of the headers.
In some aspects, the invention combines the one or more advantages associated with traditional module systems with those of immersed systems. For example, newer immersed systems can incorporate advanced scouring technology based on jet aeration techniques. Jet aerators typically entrain a gas, typically air, into a liquid stream which then can be directed toward or within the membrane modules or bundles in a multi-phase flow regime. The scouring fluid can thus have particulate matter, liquid to be purified, and/or entrained gas. Such multi-phased scouring fluids may be more energy dependent per unit air volume than simple bubbling, but nonetheless, the flow effect may provide technical and/or operational advantages by, for example, improving liquid circulation and directing gas to positions or regions that are most effective in maintaining membrane performance, which may provide improved overall or system-wide efficiency.
Thus, in some aspects, the present invention advantageously utilizes jet aeration systems and techniques, while reducing or eliminating problems such as fiber breakage, misdirected air flow, and concentration polarization. At the same time, the invention can avoid or reduce costly piping and manifolding of traditional modules and the need for leak free pressure vessels and pumping of retentate. In some embodiments of the invention, a membrane module is comprised of hollow fiber membranes potted at either end, encased in a shell that at least partially restrains the fiber motion to a limited value, irrespective of membrane slack dictated by the separation distance between headers. In that way, the module is constructed similarly to traditional tangential flow modules. The resulting configuration reduces fiber breakage and can reduce if not eliminate any need to control the degree of fiber slack or longitudinal flexibility, e.g., between headers, because the fibers would be at least partially constrained to within their elastic limit. The enclosure or encasement can, in some aspects of the invention, further create a defined flow channel for liquid to flow tangentially along the membrane surface. Such configurations and assemblies can reduce or even mitigate fouling, plugging, and polarization phenomena. Thus, the encasement can thus provide most if not all the advantages of a traditional pressurized module system. Typically, the encasement must be constructed and arranged to withstand forces exerted thereon such as, but not limited to, internal pressure losses due to tangential flow. However, the amount of pressure resistance is small compared to traditional shell modules and thus the construction of the encasement does not need to involve strength materials, nor does it need to be circularly cylindrical in shape. The encasement can be constructed of any material capable of containing an inner or interior volume enclosing the fiber membrane from an exterior or outer volume, such as, but not limited to, low cost polypropylene, polyethylene, or PVC.
In an immersed system, unlike traditional pressure modules, the hydrodynamic pressure forces due to water depth are offsetting since they are similar both inside and outside the module. The enclosure or encasement can, in some embodiments, be configured as a sleeve that can surround partially or substantially the periphery of the membranes module. Particular embodiments thereof can be directed to solid or otherwise non-porous structures. However, the invention is not limited to utilizing non-porous structures. The encasement can thus comprise any structure that serves to inhibit egress of the one or more scouring fluids from the proximity of the membranes. Indeed, a porous structure having one or a plurality of apertures or openings may sufficiently serve to retain at least a satisfactory fraction of the scouring fluid against the plurality of fiber membranes. In some cases, the structure can have one or more regions that is at least partially porous and one or more other regions that is non-porous. The encasement can be a box-like structure extending along a length or longitudinal axis of the module. Thus, in some embodiments, one or more screens and/or baffle plates can maintain the scouring fluid against at least a portion of the fiber membranes. The encasement can have apertures or openings at one or both ends to allow the flow of fluid therethrough. In other embodiments, the encasement can have a pair of opposed walls positioned on either side of the module. More than 50% of the module can be enclosed by the encasement and, more preferably, 70% or above is enclosed. Moreover, variants of such embodiments may entail modules having one or more of the remaining sides open or in communication with other similarly configured modules.
Other preferred arrangements or configurations involve modules that are submerged in a tank containing the liquid suspension and wherein permeate is collected by applying a vacuum or static head to the membrane lumens. The membranes within the module can extend between upper and lower headers and the liquid suspension and the gas can be introduced beneath the lower header or in the vicinity of the lower header of the module. In still other preferred embodiments, the fluid is flowed into the module through openings in the lower header. The two-phase fluid then flows along the length of the module, creating a cross-flow effect. Either liquid or gas, or both can be injected continuously or intermittently into the module.
The encasements can be rectangularly cylindrical in shape to conform to any module design. From a space saving perspective, rectangular cylinder shapes may be preferred because they can often offer the most membrane area for a given tank volume. Because no piping is typically needed, the end sections of the casing can remain open, or, alternately it can be enclosed to allow internal pressurization. Typically, however, the casing or shell is less expensive to construct than a traditional pressure driven cylindrical module. In some cases, the casing or shell need not be liquid tight—only tight enough so that most or essentially all of the air liquid mixture is directed in the desired manner through the module. However, the traditional problems with pressurized module leaks can be avoided because any such leakage can innocuously flow from the inside of the module outwardly into the bulk liquid in the tank.
The invention, however, can also utilize some, if not all, the advantages associated with immersed module systems. Typically, the permeate is suctioned off at one or both ends of such systems so that pressurized retentate need not necessarily be utilized to force or induce liquid through the membranes. The permeate collection subsystem can thus have the same advantageous features as immersed systems. The resultant effect provides circulation within the module that is efficient, if not optimal, because gas bubbles are at least partially constrained by the encasement or shell and, in some instances can be forced into the interior of the membrane bundles.
One embodiment of the invention involves jet aeration to provide one or more scouring fluids that can be mixture of at least one liquid, at least one gas, and/or solids at any predetermined ratio. The ratio can be any ratio that provides the desired scouring effect. For example, air and the liquid to be treated or purified can be used in the scouring fluid at a gas/liquid ratio from 1:99 to 50:50. Desirable ranges vary from about 4 m3 to about 9 m3 air per hour per bundle to about 2 m3 to about 6 m3 per hour per bundle of liquid, e.g., mixed liquor. Indeed a typical scouring fluid can have about 9 m3 of air and about 4 m3 to 4.5 m3 of mixed liquor per hour per module or bundle. The scouring fluid can be directed through the jet aeration system at any desirable pressure but is typically at least at a pressure that overcomes the static head and, in some cases, also any momentum head and fluid dynamic losses through the fixtures.
The scouring fluid motivated by such jet aeration subsystems can flow up through the module. In some embodiments of the invention, the jet aerator assembly creates small scale or localized membrane vibration phenomenon that loosen any particles that might otherwise attach to the membrane surfaces, eliminates concentration polarization, provides additional feed liquid into the module to reduce localized retentate particle concentration, and/or generates scouring effect throughout the membrane bundle. Unlike traditional immersed systems, efficient scouring fluid flow of the invention is at least partially if not entirely directed against the membranes, resulting a more energy efficient use of air and recirculation resources. Still there is enough membrane movement to prevent particulate plugging. Backwash and chemical cleaning may also be utilized.
Jet aeration systems and techniques of the invention can be performed through one or more headers as in traditional immersed systems. Jet aeration systems and techniques of the invention are not limited to being initiated from the lower header and into the bundles because the system can be connected along a periphery or side of the module or fiber bundle so that a direct scouring effect can be driven to be perpendicularly oriented relative to the longitudinal aspect of the membranes. Further, one or more scouring fluids can be directed in a spiral manner within the bundle volume by using vortex forces thereby further to improving membrane performance and reduce fouling.
The module can be immersed in any direction—vertical, horizontal, or at an angle. In any of these directions, scouring fluid flow can be directed such that a desired degree of scouring can occur by configuration and/or arrangement of the aeration flow pushing against the inside walls of the encasement or enclosure. Air/liquid mixtures, for example, can also be injected at different locations 10a along the fiber bundle in an unlimited number of combinations. In fact, at effective air/liquid jet velocities, air bubbles can be injected into the top end 7 of a vertical module and forced downwardly and eject out of the bottom 8 of the module 8, which is likely to maximize the scouring effect of the bubbles as they will maintain their size throughout—starting out small at the top of the tank and low pressure and then coalescing but maintaining low bubble size because of the increase in pressure as they stream toward the bottom of the tank. Similar to immersed systems, the volume of gas can be varied over time from high levels to zero, depending on optimization of fouling, flux, and energy costs.
In certain applications such as those pertinent to wastewater treatment requiring, for example, return activated sludge, one drawback of traditional immersed systems is that there is no convenient position within the tank where more concentrated sludge is available. In the present inventive construction, the outlet retentate circulation flow from the module will be a particular point of high solids content that can be either pulled off back and recycled to an earlier stage of the process or removed from the process for sludge dewatering or other treatment, such as chemical treatment for phosphorous removal. In other applications where wastewater contains solids that may damage membrane fibers such as trash or hair, the shell modules of the invention have a further advantage in that the source of liquid to the fibers is at a localized position, which can thus be much more readily strained or filtered of harmful solids than if the entire membrane bundle was exposed directly to tank liquid.
The enclosure typically would not directly contact the any of the membranes in a bundle, but would be separated by some distance by a screen. The screen would allow liquid flow to contact the outermost membrane fibers while at the same time, allowing controlled movement and vibration of the fibers as the scouring jet mixture flow tangentially passes through the module.
In accordance with some aspects, the invention may be embodied as a membrane filtration module having a plurality of permeable, hollow membranes mounted therein. In typical use, a pressure differential is applied across the walls of the permeable, hollow membranes immersed in a liquid suspension containing suspended solids, said liquid suspension being applied to one surface of the permeable, hollow membranes to induce and sustain filtration through the membrane walls wherein some of the liquid suspension passes through the walls of the membranes to be drawn off as clarified liquid or permeate, and at least some of the solids are retained on or in the permeable, hollow membranes or otherwise as suspended solids within the liquid suspension, the module including a fluid retaining means at least partially surrounding the membrane module for substantially retaining at least part of fluid flowed into the membrane module. The permeate is collected by application of a vacuum or static head to a permeate side of the membrane walls.
The fluid retaining means can be, in some embodiments of the invention, a sleeve or shell substantially surrounding the periphery of the membrane module. Typically, the sleeve or shell is solid, at least preventing direct communication between an interior volume and an exterior volume of the sleeve or shell. The sleeve or shell, however, can have, in some case openings or apertures at least one end thereof that allow the flow of fluid therethrough or between the interior volume and the exterior volume. Further embodiments of the invention contemplate configurations wherein the sleeve or shell has a box-like structure extending along a substantial portion if not the entire length of the module. Indeed, in some cases, more than about 50% of the module is enclosed by the fluid retaining means. Where advantageous, configurations of the modules of the invention involve enclosing at least 70% of the module by the fluid retaining means. The fluid retaining means can at least partially surround one or more groups of membrane modules.
In accordance with further aspects of the invention, the fluid retaining means can be at least one pair of opposed walls positioned on either side of the module.
The invention contemplates configurations wherein the modules are submerged in a tank containing a liquid suspension, having solids suspended in a liquid. Furthermore, the scouring fluid can comprise the liquid to be treated or purified. For example, the scouring fluid can be introduced through the jet aeration system as a three-phase mixture of a gas and a liquid having solids suspended therein. Mixing of the scouring liquid components can be effected upstream of a point of introduction into the enclosure volume, at the point of introduction, or within the enclosure volume.
The fluid can be a gas, mixture of a gas and a liquid or gas, a liquid, solids, typically suspended in the liquid. A portion of the fluid can include at least some of the liquid suspension. The fluid can be introduced beneath a lower header or in the vicinity of the lower header of the module or at any position along the longitudinal aspect of the fiber membranes. The fluid can be introduced into the module, into the interior volume defined by the sleeve or shell through one or more openings in the lower header. In some cases, the introduced fluid flows along the length of the module and can create a cross-flow. The fluid can be introduced continuously, continually, intermittently, or periodically.
Further aspects of the invention can involve methods of filtering solids from a liquid suspension using a plurality of permeable, hollow membranes mounted in a membrane module. Some embodiments thereof can involve introducing a fluid containing the liquid suspension into the membrane module such that the liquid suspension is applied to one surface of the permeable, hollow membranes. A pressure differential across the walls of the permeable, hollow membranes immersed in the liquid suspension containing suspended solids can be applied or otherwise be created to induce filtration through at least a portion of the membrane walls. Some of the liquid suspension thus passes through the walls of the membranes and be withdrawn off as clarified liquid or permeate during which some of the solids suspended in the liquid are retained on or in the permeable, hollow membranes or otherwise as suspended solids within the liquid suspension. The fluid retaining means can retain at least a portion, if not a substantial part, of at least part of the fluid flowed into the membrane module by at least partially surrounding the membrane module with the sleeve or shell that at least partially, if not substantially, surrounds the periphery of the membrane module. The method can further involve applying a vacuum or inducing a static head to a permeate side of the membrane walls to facilitate withdrawal of the permeate fluid.
a to 1c illustrate the operation of three different module configurations. The membrane module 5 in each configuration has a plurality of hollow fiber membranes 6 extending between upper and lower headers 7 and 8. The fibers 6 in the upper header 7 opening into a permeate collection chamber 9. The lower header 8 has a plurality of aeration openings 10 for feeding gas and/or liquid into the membrane module. An open mixing chamber 11 is provided below the lower header 8 and is usually formed by a downwardly extending skirt 12. One or more particulate screens (not shown) may be used to remove large-sized solids (such as hair or trash) and prevent damaging the membranes.
a is the configuration of one embodiment of the invention. Gas, typically air, and liquid feed are injected into a membrane module 5 within an enclosure or sleeve 13 surrounding the periphery of the module 5. The scouring mixture then flows upward along the module 5 creating a cross-flow or transverse fluid direction forces. The gas bubbles and the concentrated feed can be released at the vicinity of the upper header 7 of the module 5 through one or more openings 14 in the upper portion of the enclosure 13.
The gas and feed liquid can be mixed in the open chamber 11 beneath the lower header 8, and then fed into the module 5. Alternatively, the multi-phase fluid can be directly injected to the lower header 8 through a direct connection (not shown). Either gas or liquid, or both can be supplied continuously or intermittently.
b shows a module configuration wherein a module 5 has a perforated screen 15. Although a mixture of gas and feed liquid is injected into the module 5, the gas bubbles can partly escape from any portion of the module 5 and the feed liquid may also escape through diffusion with the bulk feed liquid. Accordingly, the cross-flow effect may be reduced in such a configuration but can still provide sufficient retentive capacity that creates relatively improved scouring forces.
If no screen is used with the module 5 the membrane fibers 6 can move in a larger zone as shown in
U.S. Pat. No. 6,524,481, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety discloses the benefit of employing multi-phase mixture to scrub membranes. When the enclosure of the invention is used to restrict the flow dispersal, the energy of the scouring fluid is efficiently utilized.
It will be appreciated that this concept is easily applied to modules of other configurations, such as rectangular and square modules.
Instead of using an enclosure for each individual module 5, an alternative embodiment may use a common enclosure 13 for an array of modules of fiber membranes 6 as shown in
The modules need not be fully enclosed to provide a cross-flow effect, a pair of opposed baffle walls on one or more sides of the module or array of modules can be used to at least partially retain the flow of scouring fluid within the enclosed module or bundle volume.
In the above examples, the gas and/or the concentrated feed are released through openings 14 in the enclosure 13 near the upper header 7 of the module or modules, they can also be released through the spaces, openings, or gaps 16 defined or created within the bundle; sub-modules; or between the modules as illustrated in
In the description above, gas and feed, fluid to the treated or purified, are typically injected from beneath the lower header. Alternatively, gas and feed may also be injected from the side of the lower header into the enclosure 13.
Some aspects of the invention may involve one or a plurality of sensors as well as one or a plurality of types or kinds of sensors (not shown). Sensors that may be utilized in the systems and techniques of the invention can measure or provide, for example, density, flow rate, viscosity, turbidity, conductivity, pressure, temperature, pH, streaming current, oxidation-reduction potential, and concentration of one or more species, of one or more fluids or components of fluids of the treatment or purification system. Any one or more of these sensors may be disposed or configured to measure or otherwise provide an indication of the operating status or can provide a direct or indirect indication of a characteristic or property of a stream or unit operation in the system or component thereof. Other embodiments of the invention may involve one or more sensors measuring various characteristics of, for example, the retentate, the permeate, or the pressure differential across one or more membrane modules.
A process parameter, as used herein, is typically a measured or calculated quantity and can include, for example, pH, temperature, pressure, pressure differential, oxidation-reduction potential, concentration, flow rate, turbidity, and viscosity. Process parameters can also be intrinsic quantities such as, but not limited to, density, thermal conductivity, and heat capacity.
The system of the invention can optionally include one or more control systems or controllers that facilitate operating parameters of treatment or purification system. Typically, the controller (not shown) is configured to receive at least one indication of a characteristic of the purification or treatment system or one or more components thereof and preferably, further react or provide an appropriate response to the measured characteristic. For example, a characteristic of the permeate stream withdrawn from one or more membrane modules can be monitored by one or more sensors. The measured characteristic can be transmitted to the controller which, if necessary, generates a corresponding signal according to a control scheme. The control signal is typically transmitted to one or more sub-unit operations of the treatment system to adjust one or more operating conditions thereof. The control loop involving such components may utilize any conventional control technique including, for example, proportional, integral, and derivative schemes as well as combinations thereof. For example, the controller of the invention may vary the ratio of gas to liquid used as the scouring fluid, vary the delivered pressure or volume of the scouring fluid, vary the position or point of introduction of the scouring fluid in the one or more modules or bundles, and/or vary the period or duration of scouring.
Varying any one or more parameters of the jet aeration system or the scouring fluid can be effected through activation or energizing valves or motors. For example, the jet aeration system may be intermittently operated, e.g., alternating on/off periods of 3 minutes by actuating valves that direct the scouring liquid to a first module and/or to another module.
The invention may be practiced to involve other control configurations. For example, the control technique may incorporate adaptive methods that involve machine learning with or without statistical analysis, expert systems that apply reasoning capabilities to reach a conclusion, case-based reasoning, Bayesian networks, and/or behavior-based methods; and/or computational intelligence that involve iterative development or learning, e.g., parameter tuning that implicate neural networks or systems with predominant pattern recognition capabilities, fuzzy systems or techniques for reasoning under uncertainty, and evolutionary computational schemes that, for example, mimic biological behavior to generate increasingly stable control solutions.
The one or more controller of the systems of the invention may be implemented using one or more computer systems which may be, for example, a general-purpose computer such as those based on an Intel PENTIUM®-type processor, a Motorola PowerPC® processor, a Sun UltraSPARC® processor, a Hewlett-Packard PA-RISC® processor, or any other type of processor or combinations thereof. Alternatively, the computer system may include specially-programmed, special-purpose hardware, for example, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or controllers intended for water treatment system.
The computer system can include one or more processors typically connected to one or more memory devices, which can comprise, for example, any one or more of a disk drive memory, a flash memory device, a RAM memory device, or other device for storing data. The memory component is typically used for storing programs and data during operation of the system and/or the computer system. For example, memory may be used for storing historical data relating to the parameters of the water over a period of time, as well as current sensor measurement data. Software, including programming code that implements embodiments of the invention, can be stored on a computer readable and/or writeable nonvolatile recording medium, and then typically copied into one or more memory components wherein it can then be executed by the one or more processors. Such programming code may be written in any of a plurality of programming languages, for example, Java, Visual Basic, C, C#, or C++, Fortran, Pascal, Eiffel, Basic, COBAL, or any of a variety of combinations thereof.
The components of the computer system may be coupled by an interconnection mechanism, which may include one or more busses (e.g., between components that are integrated within a same device) and/or a network (e.g., between components that reside on separate discrete devices). The interconnection mechanism typically enables communications (e.g., data, instructions) to be exchanged between components of system.
The computer system can optionally include one or more input devices, for example, a keyboard, mouse, trackball, microphone, touch screen, and one or more output devices, for example, a printing device, display screen, or speaker. In addition, the computer system may also optionally have one or more interfaces that can connect the computer system to one or more communication networks (in addition or as an alternative to the network that may be formed by one or more of the components of system).
According to one or more embodiments of the invention, the one or more input devices may include sensors for measuring parameters of the incoming and treated streams such as one or more of sensors, and the one or more output devices may include one or more components, such as metering valves and/or pumps of, for example, an air or gas source or a liquid source for the scouring fluid. Alternatively, the sensors, the metering valves and/or pumps, or all of these components may be connected to a communication network that is operatively coupled to computer system. For example, one or more sensors may be configured as input devices that are directly connected to one or more controllers, metering valves and/or pumps of one or more subsystems, may be configured as output devices that are connected to the controller, and any one or more of the above may be coupled to another computer system or component so as to communicate with one or more computer systems of the controller over a communication network. Such a configuration permits one sensor to be located at a significant distance from another sensor or allow any sensor to be located at a significant distance from any subsystem and/or the controller, while still providing data therebetween.
The controller can include one or more computer storage media such as readable and/or writeable nonvolatile recording medium in which signals can be stored that define a program to be executed by one or more processors of the controller. The computer-readable medium may, for example, be a disk or flash memory. In typical operation, one or more processors can cause data to be read from the storage medium into a memory component that allows for faster access to the information by the one or more processors than does the medium. Memory is typically implemented as volatile, random access memory such as a dynamic random access memory (DRAM) or static memory (SRAM) or other suitable devices that facilitates information transfer to and from the one or more processors.
It should be appreciated that the invention is not limited to being implemented in software, or on the computer system. Indeed, rather than implemented on, for example, a general purpose computer system, the controller, or components or subsections thereof, may alternatively be implemented as a dedicated system or as a dedicated programmable logic controller (PLC) or in a distributed control system. Further, it should be appreciated that one or more features or aspects of the invention may be implemented in software, hardware or firmware, or any combination thereof. For example, one or more segments of an algorithm executable by controller 140 can be performed in separate computers, each of which can be in communication through one or more networks.
A standard submerged membrane filtration module, containing 2,200 fibers, was tested to filter mixed liquor from the bioreactor. Without the enclosure, an air flow-rate of 3 m3/hr was required to achieve a stable filtration performance at a flux of 30 L/m2/hr. When an enclosure was used, the air requirement was dropped to 2 m3/hr to achieve a similar result, a saving of air by 33%.
The filtration process provided by the invention is different from the conventional cross-flow filtration process, as the gas scouring generates more efficient cleaning with less energy in the submerged cross-flow filtration system. The enclosure used is of a low cost and needs little pressure tolerance.
Thus, the submerged cross-flow filtration system described here combines the low capital cost of the submerged system with the efficiency of the cross-flow process.
While the inventive concept has been illustrated in the embodiments and examples with reference to hollow fiber membrane modules in a vertical configuration it will be appreciated the invention is also applicable to flat sheet membranes and capillary membranes with a horizontal or non-vertical orientation.
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment of this invention, it is to be appreciated various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the invention contemplates sequentially configured membrane modules wherein retentate removed from a first or an upstream module is introduced into a second or a downstream module as liquid to be treated. In other contemplated configurations, retentate is recycled through one or more module subsystems, sequentially or in parallel to other module assemblies. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2004906322 | Nov 2004 | AU | national |
This application claims priority under to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/684,710, entitled “HYBRID TANGENTIAL FLOW MEMBRANE MODULE FOR IMMERSED WATER AND WASTEWATER APPLICATION,” filed on May 26, 2005, and is a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/AU2005/001662, filed Oct. 26, 2005 under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, which was published by the International Bureau in English on May 11, 2006 as International Publication Number WO 2006/047814 A1, which designates the U.S. and claims the benefit of Australian Application No. 2004906322, filed on Nov. 2, 2004, each of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
256008 | Leak | Apr 1882 | A |
285321 | Tams | Sep 1883 | A |
540528 | Williams | Jun 1895 | A |
1997074 | Novotny | Apr 1935 | A |
2080783 | Petersen | May 1937 | A |
2105700 | Ramage | Jan 1938 | A |
2843038 | Manspeaker | Jul 1958 | A |
2926086 | Chenicek et al. | Feb 1960 | A |
3183191 | Hach | May 1965 | A |
3198636 | Bouthilet | Aug 1965 | A |
3228876 | Mahon | Jan 1966 | A |
3442002 | Geary et al. | May 1969 | A |
3462362 | Kollsman | Aug 1969 | A |
3492698 | Geary et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3556305 | Shorr | Jan 1971 | A |
3591010 | Pall | Jul 1971 | A |
3625827 | Wildi et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3654147 | Levin et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3693406 | Tobin | Sep 1972 | A |
3700561 | Ziffer | Oct 1972 | A |
3708071 | Crowley | Jan 1973 | A |
3728256 | Cooper | Apr 1973 | A |
3763055 | White et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3791631 | Meyer | Feb 1974 | A |
3804258 | Okuniewski et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3843809 | Luck | Oct 1974 | A |
3876738 | Marinaccio et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3955998 | Clampitt et al. | May 1976 | A |
3968192 | Hoffman, III et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3992301 | Shippey et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
3993816 | Baudet et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4049765 | Yamazaki | Sep 1977 | A |
4076656 | White et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4082683 | Galesloot | Apr 1978 | A |
4105731 | Yamazaki | Aug 1978 | A |
4107043 | McKinney | Aug 1978 | A |
4138460 | Tigner | Feb 1979 | A |
4183890 | Bollinger | Jan 1980 | A |
4188817 | Steigelmann et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4190411 | Fujimoto | Feb 1980 | A |
4192750 | Elfes et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4193780 | Cotton et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4203848 | Grandine, II | May 1980 | A |
4204961 | Cusato, Jr. | May 1980 | A |
4218324 | Hartmann et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4226921 | Tsang | Oct 1980 | A |
4227295 | Bodnar et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4230583 | Chiolle et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4247498 | Castro | Jan 1981 | A |
4248648 | Kopp | Feb 1981 | A |
4253936 | Leysen et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4271026 | Chen et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4302336 | Kawaguchi et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4340479 | Pall | Jul 1982 | A |
4350592 | Kronsbein | Sep 1982 | A |
4353802 | Hara et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4359359 | Gerlach et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4369605 | Opersteny et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4384474 | Kowalski | May 1983 | A |
4385150 | Miyake et al. | May 1983 | A |
4388189 | Kawaguchi et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4389363 | Molthop | Jun 1983 | A |
4407975 | Yamaguchi | Oct 1983 | A |
4414113 | LaTerra | Nov 1983 | A |
4414172 | Leason | Nov 1983 | A |
4431545 | Pall et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4451369 | Sekino et al. | May 1984 | A |
4476112 | Aversano | Oct 1984 | A |
4491522 | Ishida et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4496470 | Kapiloff et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4511471 | Müller | Apr 1985 | A |
4519909 | Castro | May 1985 | A |
4540490 | Shibata et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4547289 | Okano et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4609465 | Miller | Sep 1986 | A |
4610789 | Barch | Sep 1986 | A |
4614109 | Hoffman | Sep 1986 | A |
4623670 | Mutoh et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4629563 | Wrasidlo | Dec 1986 | A |
4632745 | Giuffrida et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4636296 | Kunz | Jan 1987 | A |
4642182 | Drori | Feb 1987 | A |
4647377 | Miura | Mar 1987 | A |
4650586 | Ellis | Mar 1987 | A |
4650596 | Schleuter et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4656865 | Callan | Apr 1987 | A |
4660411 | Reid | Apr 1987 | A |
4666543 | Kawano | May 1987 | A |
4670145 | Edwards | Jun 1987 | A |
4673507 | Brown | Jun 1987 | A |
4687561 | Kunz | Aug 1987 | A |
4687578 | Stookey | Aug 1987 | A |
4688511 | Gerlach et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4689191 | Beck et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4702836 | Mutoh et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702840 | Degen et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4707266 | Degen et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4708799 | Gerlach et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4718270 | Storr | Jan 1988 | A |
4744240 | Reichelt | May 1988 | A |
4749487 | Lefebvre | Jun 1988 | A |
4756875 | Tajima et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763612 | Iwanami | Aug 1988 | A |
4767539 | Ford | Aug 1988 | A |
4774132 | Joffee et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4775471 | Nagai et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4779448 | Gogins | Oct 1988 | A |
4781831 | Goldsmith | Nov 1988 | A |
4784771 | Wathen et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4793932 | Ford et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4797187 | Davis et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4797211 | Ehrfeld et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4810384 | Fabre | Mar 1989 | A |
4812235 | Seleman et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4816160 | Ford et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4824563 | Iwahori et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4834998 | Shrikhande | May 1989 | A |
4839048 | Reed et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4840227 | Schmidt | Jun 1989 | A |
4846970 | Bertelsen et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4867883 | Daigger et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4876006 | Ohkubo et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4876012 | Kopp et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4886601 | Iwatsuka et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4888115 | Marinaccio et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4904426 | Lundgard et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4919815 | Copa et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4921610 | Ford et al. | May 1990 | A |
4931186 | Ford et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4933084 | Bandel et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4935143 | Kopp et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4963304 | Im et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4968430 | Hildenbrand et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4968733 | Muller et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4969997 | Klüver et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4988444 | Applegate et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4999038 | Lundberg | Mar 1991 | A |
5005430 | Kibler et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5015275 | Beck et al. | May 1991 | A |
5024762 | Ford et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5034125 | Karbachsch et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5043113 | Kafchinski et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5059317 | Marius et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5066375 | Parsi et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5066401 | Muller et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5066402 | Anselme et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5069065 | Sprunt et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5075065 | Effenberger et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5076925 | Roesink et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5079272 | Allegrezza et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5094750 | Kopp et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5094867 | Detering et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098567 | Nishiguchi | Mar 1992 | A |
5104535 | Cote et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5104546 | Filson et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
H1045 | Wilson | May 1992 | H |
5135663 | Newberth, III et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5137631 | Eckman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5138870 | Lyssy | Aug 1992 | A |
5147553 | Waite | Sep 1992 | A |
5151191 | Sunaoka et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151193 | Grobe et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5158721 | Allegrezza et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5169528 | Karbachsch et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5169530 | Schucker et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5182019 | Cote et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192442 | Piccirillo et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5192456 | Ishida et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5192478 | Caskey | Mar 1993 | A |
5194149 | Selbie et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198116 | Comstock et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198162 | Park et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5209852 | Sunaoka et al. | May 1993 | A |
5211823 | Giuffrida et al. | May 1993 | A |
5221478 | Dhingra et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5227063 | Langerak et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5248424 | Cote et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5262054 | Wheeler | Nov 1993 | A |
5271830 | Faivre et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5275766 | Gadkaree et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5286324 | Kawai et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5290451 | Koster et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5290457 | Karbachasch et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297420 | Gilliland et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5316671 | Murphy | May 1994 | A |
5320760 | Freund et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5353630 | Soda et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358732 | Seifter et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361625 | Ylvisaker | Nov 1994 | A |
5364527 | Zimmerman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364529 | Morin et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374353 | Murphy | Dec 1994 | A |
5389260 | Hemp | Feb 1995 | A |
5393433 | Espenan et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396019 | Sartori et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5401401 | Hickok | Mar 1995 | A |
5401405 | McDougald | Mar 1995 | A |
5403479 | Smith et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405528 | Selbie et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411663 | Johnson | May 1995 | A |
5451317 | Ishida et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5468397 | Barboza et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470469 | Eckman | Nov 1995 | A |
5477731 | Mouton | Dec 1995 | A |
5479590 | Lin | Dec 1995 | A |
5480553 | Yamamori et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5484528 | Yagi et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490939 | Gerigk et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491023 | Tsai et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5501798 | Al-Samadi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5525220 | Yagi et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531848 | Brinda et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5531900 | Raghaven et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543002 | Brinda et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552047 | Oshida et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5554283 | Brinda et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556591 | Jallerat et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5575963 | Soffer et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5597732 | Bryan-Brown | Jan 1997 | A |
5607593 | Cote et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5639373 | Mahendran et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643455 | Kopp et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647988 | Kawanishi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5670053 | Collentro et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5677360 | Yamamori et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688460 | Ruschke | Nov 1997 | A |
5733456 | Okey et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5744037 | Fujimura et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5747605 | Breant et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766479 | Collentro et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
D396046 | Scheel et al. | Jul 1998 | S |
5783083 | Henshaw et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
D396726 | Sadr et al. | Aug 1998 | S |
D400890 | Gambardella | Nov 1998 | S |
5843069 | Butler et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5846424 | Khudenko | Dec 1998 | A |
5888401 | Nguyen | Mar 1999 | A |
5895570 | Liang | Apr 1999 | A |
5906739 | Osterland et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906742 | Wang et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910250 | Mahendran et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914039 | Mahendran | Jun 1999 | A |
5918264 | Drummond et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5942113 | Morimura | Aug 1999 | A |
5944997 | Pedersen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951878 | Astrom | Sep 1999 | A |
5958243 | Lawrence et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968357 | Doelle et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5988400 | Karachevtcev et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997745 | Tonelli et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017451 | Kopf | Jan 2000 | A |
6024872 | Mahendran | Feb 2000 | A |
6036030 | Stone et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039872 | Wu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042677 | Mahendran et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045698 | Cote et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6045899 | Wang et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048454 | Jenkins | Apr 2000 | A |
6048455 | Janik | Apr 2000 | A |
6066401 | Stilburn | May 2000 | A |
6074718 | Puglia et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077435 | Beck et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083393 | Wu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096213 | Radovanovic et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113782 | Leonard | Sep 2000 | A |
6120688 | Daly et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126819 | Heine et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146747 | Wang et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149817 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156200 | Zha et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159373 | Beck et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6193890 | Pedersen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202475 | Selbie et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214231 | Cote et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214232 | Baurmeister et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221247 | Nemser et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6245239 | Cote et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254773 | Biltoft | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264839 | Mohr et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277512 | Hamrock et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280626 | Miyashita et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284135 | Ookata | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290756 | Macheras et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294039 | Mahendran et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299773 | Takamura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303026 | Lindbo | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303035 | Cote et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315895 | Summerton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322703 | Taniguchi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325928 | Pedersen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337018 | Mickols | Jan 2002 | B1 |
RE37549 | Mahendran et al. | Feb 2002 | E |
6354444 | Mahendran | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361695 | Husain et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368819 | Gaddy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375848 | Cote et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387189 | Gröschl et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402955 | Ookata | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6406629 | Husain et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423214 | Lindbo | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423784 | Hamrock et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432310 | Andou et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440303 | Spriegel | Aug 2002 | B2 |
D462699 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | S |
6444124 | Onyeche et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468430 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485645 | Husain et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495041 | Taniguchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6524481 | Zha et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524733 | Nonobe | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6550747 | Rabie et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555005 | Zha et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6562237 | Olaopa | May 2003 | B1 |
6576136 | De Moel et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
D478913 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2003 | S |
6613222 | Mikkelson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6620319 | Behmann et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627082 | Del Vecchio | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635179 | Summerton et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641733 | Zha et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645374 | Cote et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656356 | Gungerich et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682652 | Mahendran et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685832 | Mahendran et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6696465 | Dellaria et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702561 | Stillig et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706189 | Rabie et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708957 | Cote et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712970 | Trivedi | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721529 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723758 | Stone et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6727305 | Pavez Aranguiz | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6743362 | Porteous et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758972 | Vriens et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770202 | Kidd et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6780466 | Grangeon et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783008 | Zha et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790912 | Blong | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805806 | Arnaud | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6808629 | Wouters-Wasiak et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811696 | Wang et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6814861 | Husain et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821420 | Zha et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6841070 | Zha et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6861466 | Dadalas et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6863817 | Liu et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6863823 | Côté | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6869534 | McDowell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872305 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6881343 | Rabie et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884350 | Muller | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884375 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890435 | Ji et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6890645 | Disse et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893568 | Janson et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6899812 | Cote et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6946073 | Daigger et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952258 | Ebert et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6955762 | Gallagher et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6964741 | Mahendran et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969465 | Zha et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974554 | Cox et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6994867 | Hossainy et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7005100 | Lowel | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7014763 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018530 | Pollock | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018533 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022233 | Chen | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041728 | Zipplies et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7052610 | Janson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7083733 | Freydina et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7147778 | DiMassimo et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7160455 | Taniguchi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160463 | Beck et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172701 | Gaid et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7223340 | Zha et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226541 | Muller et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7247238 | Mullette et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7264716 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7300002 | Muller | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20010027951 | Gungerich et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020070157 | Yamada | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020148767 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153299 | Mahendran et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153313 | Cote | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030038080 | Vriens et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057155 | Husain et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030075504 | Zha et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030127388 | Ando et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030136746 | Behman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141248 | Mahendran et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146153 | Cote et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030150807 | Bartels et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159988 | Daigger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164332 | Mahendran et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030178365 | Zha et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030226797 | Phelps | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234221 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000520 | Gallagher et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007525 | Rabie et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040035770 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035782 | Muller | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040084369 | Zha et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040145076 | Zha et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168979 | Zha et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040173525 | Hunniford et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040178154 | Zha et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191894 | Muller et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217053 | Zha et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232076 | Zha et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050029185 | Muller | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050029186 | Muller | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032982 | Muller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050061725 | Liu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050087898 | Cox et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050103722 | Freydina et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109692 | Zha et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115880 | Pollock | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050115899 | Liu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139538 | Lazaredes | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050194310 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050194315 | Adams et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060000775 | Zha et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060131234 | Zha et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060201876 | Jordan | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060261007 | Zha et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273038 | Syed et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070007214 | Zha et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070056905 | Beck et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075017 | Kuzma | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070075021 | Johnson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070084791 | Jordan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070084795 | Jordan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070108125 | Cho et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138090 | Jordan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070170112 | Elefritz et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070227973 | Zha et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3440084 | Sep 1983 | AU |
5584786 | Mar 1985 | AU |
7706687 | Jul 1986 | AU |
1050770 | Jan 1995 | CN |
3904544 | Aug 1990 | DE |
4117281 | Jan 1992 | DE |
4113420 | Oct 1992 | DE |
4117422 | Nov 1992 | DE |
29804927 | Jun 1998 | DE |
29906389 | Jun 1999 | DE |
012557 | Feb 1983 | EP |
126714 | Nov 1984 | EP |
050447 | Oct 1985 | EP |
250337 | Dec 1987 | EP |
327025 | Aug 1989 | EP |
090383 | May 1990 | EP |
407900 | Jan 1991 | EP |
492942 | Jul 1992 | EP |
518250 | Dec 1992 | EP |
547575 | Jun 1993 | EP |
395133 | Feb 1995 | EP |
463627 | May 1995 | EP |
662341 | Jul 1995 | EP |
492446 | Nov 1995 | EP |
430082 | Jun 1996 | EP |
734758 | Oct 1996 | EP |
763758 | Oct 1996 | EP |
824956 | Feb 1998 | EP |
855214 | Jul 1998 | EP |
627255 | Jan 1999 | EP |
911073 | Apr 1999 | EP |
920904 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 034 835 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1034835 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1052012 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1349644 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1350555 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1236503 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1659171 | May 2006 | EP |
2620712 | Mar 1989 | FR |
2674448 | Feb 1992 | FR |
2699424 | Jun 1994 | FR |
2762834 | Nov 1998 | FR |
702911 | Jan 1954 | GB |
2253572 | Sep 1992 | GB |
54-162684 | Dec 1979 | JP |
55-129155 | Jun 1980 | JP |
55-099703 | Jul 1980 | JP |
55-129107 | Oct 1980 | JP |
56-021604 | Feb 1981 | JP |
56-118701 | Sep 1981 | JP |
56-121685 | Sep 1981 | JP |
58-088007 | May 1983 | JP |
60-019002 | Jan 1985 | JP |
60-206412 | Oct 1985 | JP |
61-097005 | May 1986 | JP |
61-097006 | May 1986 | JP |
61-107905 | May 1986 | JP |
61-167406 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61-167407 | Jul 1986 | JP |
S6338884 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61-171504 | Aug 1986 | JP |
61-192309 | Aug 1986 | JP |
61-222510 | Oct 1986 | JP |
61-242607 | Oct 1986 | JP |
61-249505 | Nov 1986 | JP |
61-257203 | Nov 1986 | JP |
61-263605 | Nov 1986 | JP |
61-291007 | Dec 1986 | JP |
61-293504 | Dec 1986 | JP |
62-004408 | Jan 1987 | JP |
62-114609 | May 1987 | JP |
62-140607 | Jun 1987 | JP |
62-144708 | Jun 1987 | JP |
62-163708 | Jul 1987 | JP |
62-179540 | Aug 1987 | JP |
62-250908 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63-097634 | Apr 1988 | JP |
63-143905 | Jun 1988 | JP |
63-171607 | Jul 1988 | JP |
63-180254 | Jul 1988 | JP |
63-3884 | Oct 1988 | JP |
01-151906 | Jun 1989 | JP |
01 307409 | Dec 1989 | JP |
02-026625 | Jan 1990 | JP |
02-031200 | Feb 1990 | JP |
02-040296 | Feb 1990 | JP |
02-107318 | Apr 1990 | JP |
02-126922 | May 1990 | JP |
02-144132 | Jun 1990 | JP |
02-164423 | Jun 1990 | JP |
02-277528 | Nov 1990 | JP |
02-284035 | Nov 1990 | JP |
03-018373 | Jan 1991 | JP |
03-028797 | Feb 1991 | JP |
03-110445 | May 1991 | JP |
04-187224 | Jul 1992 | JP |
04-250898 | Sep 1992 | JP |
04-256424 | Sep 1992 | JP |
04-265128 | Sep 1992 | JP |
4256424 | Sep 1992 | JP |
04-293527 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04-310223 | Nov 1992 | JP |
04-334530 | Nov 1992 | JP |
04-348252 | Dec 1992 | JP |
05-023557 | Feb 1993 | JP |
05-096136 | Apr 1993 | JP |
05-137977 | Jun 1993 | JP |
05-157654 | Jun 1993 | JP |
05-285348 | Nov 1993 | JP |
06-071120 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06-114240 | Apr 1994 | JP |
06-218237 | Aug 1994 | JP |
06-277469 | Oct 1994 | JP |
06-285496 | Oct 1994 | JP |
06-343837 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07-000770 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07-024272 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07-068139 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07-136470 | May 1995 | JP |
07-136471 | May 1995 | JP |
07-155758 | Jun 1995 | JP |
07-178323 | Jul 1995 | JP |
07-185268 | Jul 1995 | JP |
07-185271 | Jul 1995 | JP |
HP 7-185268 | Jul 1995 | JP |
07-236819 | Sep 1995 | JP |
07-251043 | Oct 1995 | JP |
07-275665 | Oct 1995 | JP |
07-289860 | Nov 1995 | JP |
07-303895 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08-010585 | Jan 1996 | JP |
09-072993 | Mar 1997 | JP |
09-099227 | Apr 1997 | JP |
09-141063 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09-187628 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09-220569 | Aug 1997 | JP |
09-271641 | Oct 1997 | JP |
09-324067 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-033955 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-048466 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-085565 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-156149 | Jun 1998 | JP |
63-143905 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11-028467 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-156166 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-165200 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-333265 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-033365 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11-319507 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-070684 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-185220 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-157850 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000-317276 | Nov 2000 | JP |
00-0342932 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001-009246 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-070967 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-079367 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-104760 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-190937 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-190938 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-205055 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2003-047830 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-062436 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003-135935 | May 2003 | JP |
05-279447 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2002-0090967 | Dec 2002 | KR |
1020491 | Oct 2003 | NL |
1021197 | Oct 2003 | NL |
347343 | Dec 1998 | TW |
WO 88-06200 | Aug 1988 | WO |
WO 89-00880 | Feb 1989 | WO |
WO 9000434 | Jan 1990 | WO |
WO 91-04783 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO 9116124 | Oct 1991 | WO |
WO 9302779 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 9315827 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 93-23152 | Nov 1993 | WO |
WO 94-11094 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 95-34424 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 96-07470 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 96-28236 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9641676 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9706880 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9822204 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 98-25694 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9828066 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 98-53902 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 99-01207 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9959707 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 00-18498 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 00-30742 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 01-00307 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 01-32299 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0136075 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 01-45829 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 02-40140 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 03000389 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03-013706 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2004101120 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005-021140 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005-037414 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005-077499 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005-107929 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006-029456 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060273007 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60684710 | May 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/AU2005/001662 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 11441819 | US |