The present invention and its presently preferred embodiments will be better understood by way of reference to the detailed disclosure herebelow and to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
As broadly employed herein, it should be understood and appreciated that the term “fluid” can refer to a liquid, a gas, a mixture or suspension thereof, or a mixture or suspension of liquid and/or gas with solid material such as particulates.
Inlet line 102 preferably leads into a combination twin-screw pump and slug distributor in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Slug distributor 112, preferably positioned above pump 114, will be discussed in greater detail herebelow. Per convention, suction pressure and temperature transmitters 116/118, as well as discharge temperature and pressure transmitters, 120/122 may be provided as shown.
A connecting line 123 preferably leads from pump 114 to GLCC 126 via a check valve 124 and tangential inlet 125. GLCC 126, for its part (and in a manner better appreciated herebelow), includes a cyclonic column 128 and recombination column 130 per convention. These are interconnected at an upper region via gas connector 132 and a lower region via liquid connector 134. A recombination port 136 is disposed at a vertically intermediate point of recombination column 130, while towards a vertically lower portion there is preferably provided a recirculation port 138. Recombination port 136 accepts recombined gas and liquid and feeds into outlet line 104 while recirculation port 138 feeds into a recirculation line 140. Not shown within cyclonic column 130 is a baffle plate, which will be discussed in greater detail herebelow.
Recirculation line 140, for its part, feeds generally back into slug distributor 112 after passing through a choke valve 142 and past suction pressure and temperature transmitter. An intercooler 139 may optionally be provided (see discussion further below).
Having provided a basic framework for understanding and appreciating various embodiments of the present invention,
The discussion now turns to a GLCC 226 and related recirculation components in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It should be understood that such a recirculation arrangement could be employed of its own merit in a subsea pumping system, or may be combined with a liquid slug distributor to be discussed in more detail further below. FIGS. 2 and 3A-3C may be referred to simultaneously in connection with the discussion presented below. As such,
As shown, and as conventionally known, connecting line 223 leads to a tangential inlet 225 in the form of a sloping inlet pipe. The “tangential” aspect of this inlet is characterized by its approach at a tangent to vertical cyclonic column 228. Thusly, the sloped inlet 225 begins a preseparation of the incoming fluid mixture into phases while at the point of tangential entry itself, a vortex is initiated within cyclonic column 228. As can be appreciated, centrifugal force will then tend to urge gas out of the incoming liquid.
As the gas and liquid separate from each other by way of the vortex just mentioned, the former will be urged upwardly and the latter, downwardly, by virtue of their relative specific gravities. Then, per convention, they will proceed to recirculation column 230 via connectors 232 (for gas) and 234 (for liquid). Each of these connectors may include a flow meter to aid in measurement of the respective flow rates or flow volumes of gas and liquid.
Accordingly, recombination column 230 affords the capability of recombining the gas and liquid for transport, particularly, out of recombination port 236 and into outlet line 204. Known mathematical models typically take into account the piping between the cyclonic column 228 and the recombination port 236, whereby it is generally desired that a pressure equilibrium be established between the tangential inlet 225 and the recombination point 236. Normally, the liquid and gas connectors (or legs) 234/232 are typically made of the same diameter pipe, and differences in pressure losses through the liquid and gas connectors 234/232 are reconciled by appropriately choosing the height of the recombination port 236.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the recombination column 230 is used for liquid inventory storage and can be similar in size to, or greater in diameter than, the cyclonic column 228. Whereas cyclonic column 228 is preferably sized (e.g., in diameter) to maximize the centrifugal forces in the fluid (albeit limited by erosion considerations), recombination column 230 is itself preferably sized to preserve the velocity of the liquid as it climbs up the column, so as to keep any and all particulates in suspension. This contrasts significantly with conventional GLCC's, where a cyclonic column is usually considerably greater in diameter than a recombination column (or than piping used in a recombination capacity).
Once the maximum vortex velocity is determined for a given capacity (again, erosion velocity limited) and the minimum flow rate in the vertical recombination column is selected (again, to keep particulates in suspension), it will be appreciated that the general storage capacity of GLCC 226 can also be tailored by the variable of the height of the columns 228/230. Continuity requires that taller columns still have the same vertical velocity as shorter ones; however, the total pressure loss through the GLCC is increased with taller liquid columns.
Indicated at 238 is an integrated recirculation port, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Port 238 is preferably located at a very low point of recombination column 230 so as to maximize available inventory in both columns 228/230 for recirculation. When there is no net liquid coming into the pump system at large, the liquid in GLCC 226 will drop below the level of the recombination port 236, eliminating the direct loss of liquid from the GLCC 226. Only liquid leaving port 236 in a gas phase would then be lost to the system.
As a particularly advantageous refinement, and as can best be appreciated from
As such, it is to be recognized that recombination column 230 will preferably present a uniform distribution of gas and particulates across its diameter. In this connection, the baffle plate 242 will direct the particulates and gas with a vertical velocity before they are returned to the recirculation port 238. Since particulates have negative buoyancy, they will be urged downwardly to the recirculation port 238 at the concentrations typically found in the recombination column 230. On the other hand, any entrained gas will have net buoyancy and will continue to rise even from the portion of the liquid that is reversing direction to go to the recirculation port 238.
Preferably, the baffle 242 will not welded be at the bottom and, as shown in
Though not essential, a heat exchanger or cooler could be included along the recirculation line between recirculation port 238 and any pump or slug distributor. This could be embodied, e.g., by a single coil, or pair of parallel coils, comprising relatively large diameter tubing; see, e.g., the intercooler 139 in
Most preferably, liquid traversing recirculation line 240 will encounter a fluid resistor of some type to reduce the discharge pressure to the level of the pump suction pressure it will be “meeting”, and preferably in a controlled manner. While such a resistor could be embodied by a laminar flow tube (which could double as a heat exchanger/intercooler) or a fixed resistor/orifice with a single stage or multiple orifices in series (e.g., made of tungsten carbide for erosion resistance, a variable resistor or choke valve may preferably be employed. A flow meter, indicated at 242 in
It should be appreciated that a flow meter 242 will allow for a precise setting of choke valve 246. Additionally, the flow meter 242 would be able to detect any flow resistance change, to permit the choke valve (246) opening to be reset in compensation. Such resetting could be automatic (e.g. via feedback) or could be performed via manual controls (e.g. from a remote location). The particular arrangement chosen and employed can be governed by the parameters and context of the system at hand.
Though not shown, a fast-acting shut-off valve may also optionally be included in recirculation line 240. This could provide a measure of insurance in the event of pump motor shutdown, to avert leakage of recirculation liquid into pump suction that could otherwise be employed in a pump restart. In other words, the shut-off valve (or optionally a fast choke with good shut-off characteristics) would trap liquid in the GLCC 226 for use with the next restart. (As such, GLCC 226 may preferably be located above the pump suction so that liquid will tend to feed via gravity to the pump suction for a restart.)
The disclosure now turns to a discussion of a liquid slug distributor 212 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It should be understood and appreciated that a liquid slug distributor as broadly contemplated herein may be employed of its own merit or could be combined with a GLCC recirculation arrangement such as that just discussed. FIGS. 2 and 4A-4D may be referred to simultaneously in connection with the discussion presented below. As such,
A liquid slug distributor 212, as shown, may preferably be embodied by a closed cylindrical vessel with its own tangential inlet 213, into which inlet line 202 leads. A “bowl” is essentially formed in the vessel via the installation of a standpipe 248 installed vertically in the center and extending through the bottom of the vessel; this may be thought of as a contained space (212a) defined about standpipe 248, through and over which incoming liquid describes a vortex. An outlet pipe 250 is located at the base of the cylinder, larger in diameter than the standpipe, and will lead to a pump (e.g., twin-screw pump) 214 (not shown but schematically indicated via dotted lines). The standpipe 248 feeds into outlet pipe 250.
Metering holes 252 of appropriate size penetrate the bottom of the bowl 212a in a circle surrounding the standpipe 248 but enclosed by the outlet pipe 250. (Here, six evenly distributed holes are provided.) This results in a recombination of the fluid flowing through the standpipe 248 with fluid passing through the metering holes 252. Additionally, a perforated plate 254 is preferably installed just below the level of the tangential inlet 213 and (as best appreciated by
Breather tubes 258, preferably three in number and distributed evenly about standpipe 248 as appreciated from
The liquid storage capacity of slug distributor 212 is governed by its diameter and height, reduced by the diameter and height of the standpipe. The depth of a vortex caused by the flow through the tangential inlet 213 also reduces the stored capacity in the bowl 212a. The tangential velocity and centrifugal acceleration used to promote gas separation (and thus keep liquid in the bowl 212a) is determined by the flow rate, inlet pipe diameter and bowl diameter, while the tangential velocity of course needs to be limited by erosion concerns. The contributory forces causing liquid to flow through the metering holes 252 include the head of the liquid and the differential pressure generated by pressure accumulation caused by gas flow through the standpipe 248. Note that the liquid flow is not constant; it is greatest at the end of a liquid slug and the start of a gas slug. At such an instant, the liquid level is the greatest and the pressure accumulation resulting from gas flow through the standpipe 248 provides a pressure gradient between the upper surface of the liquid and the outlet 250.
It will be appreciated that the bowl size is a function of the period of the incoming slugs, the flow rate and the gas volume fraction. Thus, by way of an illustrative and non-restrictive practical example a flow rate of 500 m3/hr (2200 gpm) with a gas volume fraction of 80% and a period of 3 seconds with a standard deviation of 1 second presents more than enough liquid to satisfy a continuous 5% or 25 m3/hr (110 gpm) of liquid; the average liquid flow would be 100 m3/hr (440 gpm). Preferably, the bowl will be configured to hold enough liquid to sustain a gas slug that is 9 seconds in length (3+6*Sigma), which is about 16.5 gallons after accounting for the reduction caused by the vortex.
In general, since pumps as employed herein typically operate at a fixed flow and speed, even when the liquid portion of a slug enters the distributor 212 the gas flow exiting though the standpipe 248 is the same as during the gas portion of the slug because the entering liquid displaces gas out of the bowl 212a and through the standpipe 248. In the event that the bowl 212a is filled, the metered flow is a function of the liquid level, the pressure accumulation due to gas flow and the flow coefficient of the metering holes. When the liquid level exceeds the height of the standpipe 248, the pressure accumulation in the standpipe 248 is slightly higher due to the presence of liquid flow, which is compensated for by the change in elevation from the inlet to the outlet. Calculations for the peak differential pressure and static head for these conditions can easily be performed, as can the average flow rates for each condition.
By way of additional components, two auxiliary connections 262 and 264 may extend outwardly from outlet 250 as shown. A branch 266 of outlet 264 may extend upward to meet the connection 241 discussed previously.
Outlet 262 may be a connection for a combined pressure and temperature transmitter of a type used subsea, with outlet 262 may be the combination point for incoming fluid and the recirculated fluid, with outlet 264 being the connection point for fluid from the GLCC that is being recirculated.
It is to be appreciated that while the GLCC recirculation arrangement and liquid slug distributor may each singly be incorporated into a general subsea multiphase pumping system of their own accord, there is contemplated in accordance with a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention a very advantageous combination of the two. Each, on its own, can help ensure that a minimum liquid flow threshold (e.g. ˜5% as already described) can be maintained. However, particular advantages are enjoyed when both arrangements are employed together.
On the one hand, the liquid slug distributor, on its own, may not be able to sustain operation if the loss of liquid exceeds a period equal to several standard deviations in the mean slug length. Additionally, it may not be able to provide sufficient flow assurance during start-up, at least until continuous periodic slug flow is achieved. On the other hand, the GLCC recirculation arrangement, on its own, may be able to support a loss of liquid of indefinite length (especially if a cooler or heat exchanger is employed) but reduces the volumetric efficiency of the process by consuming pump capacity while still requiring the power for full capacity at a given pump speed. The problem is aggravated by gas returning to the pump suction either as free gas or gas being liberated from solution when the liquid is restored to suction pressure. Typically the gas doubles the loss in pump capacity compared to the liquid required. The amount of gas returned is proportional to the amount of liquid being recirculated.
Accordingly, a combined system involving both arrangements is particularly well-geared towards optimizing pump operation. For its part, the GLCC recirculation arrangement system can provide continuous liquid flow in the face of long gas trains and even during startup where liquid sealing can permit the pump acting on gas in the production flow line to significantly lower the suction pressure of the flow line and consequently coax a well to start to flow. On the other hand, the liquid slug distributor vessel provides liquid flow assurance in steady-state conditions, making high rates of recirculation unnecessary. Instrumentation that may already be provided for pump operation and recirculation control and monitoring coupled with an appropriate operating strategy can achieve more optimal operation of the pump than possible with either system alone.
A general protocol for optimizing a composite liquid distribution/recirculation system, as broadly contemplated herein, can take the following form. For start-up and until steady state operation is achieved, recirculation can be provided at approximately 5% of pump total capacity. This quantity may be reduced for lower differential pressure during start-up; generally, the required recirculation rate will be a function of the screw outer diameter (in the twin-screw pump), the cube of the clearance and the square root of pump differential pressure. As a consequence, lower recirculation flow will be acceptable at lower differential pressures. Once steady state operation is achieved, the GVF (Gas Volume Fraction) being experienced by the pump, as well as the pump flow, can be estimated by the temperature rise across the pump and the pump speed and differential pressure; one will know in advance the specific heat of the liquid (water and petroleum) and the water cut (% of water in the liquid phase which increases as the well[s] age). In essence, as temperature rise increases (indicating high GVF), the higher the recirculation rate should be. For low temperature rise (indicating low GVF), the slug distributor alone would likely be sufficient, while for higher temperature rise more recirculation would be required.
In brief recapitulation, it will be appreciated that broadly embraced herein are systems and equipment that provide for good subsea installation and practice, by virtue of compactness, comparative low weight and freedom from intervention, as compared with topside installation. The issues of prime loss (though insufficient liquid) and pump overheating (because of fluid recirculation with a 100% gas inlet) become increasingly important as the pump boost pressure is increased in subsea contexts.
There are broadly contemplated herein, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the present invention, methods and arrangements providing continuous operation of a subsea multiphase pumping system, via boosting a multiphase petroleum stream via the use of a recirculation system. Also, the present invention, in accordance with at least one preferred embodiment, seeks to bring about distribution of unsteady liquid flow in a multiphase mixture into a more continuous minimum liquid flow. The distribution preferably occurs timewise, via averaging nearly square waves of liquid into a uniform flow.
Without further analysis, the foregoing will so fully reveal the gist of the present invention and its embodiments that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily adapt it for various applications without omitting features that, from the standpoint of prior art, fairly constitute characteristics of the generic or specific aspects of the present invention and its embodiments.
If not otherwise stated herein, it may be assumed that all components and/or processes described heretofore may, if appropriate, be considered to be interchangeable with similar components and/or processes disclosed elsewhere in the specification, unless an express indication is made to the contrary.
If not otherwise stated herein, any and all patents, patent publications, articles and other printed publications discussed or mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in their entirety herein.
It should be appreciated that the apparatus and method of the present invention may be configured and conducted as appropriate for any context at hand. The embodiments described above are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.