The present invention generally relates to ammunition articles, and more particularly to subsonic ammunition casings formed from polymeric materials.
In the field, two types of ammunition are generally recognized: traditional supersonic ammunition, which fires projectiles with velocities exceeding the speed of sound; and subsonic ammunition, which fires projectiles with velocities less than that of the speed of sound. This low-speed characteristic of the subsonic ammunition makes it much quieter than typical supersonic ammunition. The speed of sound is variable depending on the altitude and atmospheric conditions, but is generally in the range of 1,000-1,100 feet per second (fps), most commonly given at 1,086 fps at standard atmospheric conditions.
Ideally, these subsonic rounds need to work interchangeably with supersonic rounds in their ability to fit properly in the same firearm chamber. The traditional method of forming subsonic rounds is to simply reduce the propellant charge in the shell until the velocity is adequately reduced. Unfortunately, this solution is not ideal for a number of reasons. Principally these problems are rooted in the relatively large empty volume inside the case left vacant by the reduced propellant charge. This empty volume inhibits proper propellant burn, results in inconsistent propellant positioning, causes reduced accuracy, and, in special situations, may lead to extremely high propellant burn rates or even propellant detonation, an extremely dangerous situation for the weapon user. For example, since the propellant is free to move in the large empty volume, shooting upward with the propellant charge near the primer gives different velocity results than when shooting downward with the propellant charge forward. Finally, usage of subsonic ammunition, and its attending lower combustion pressures, frequently results in the inability to efficiently cycle semi-automatic or fully automatic weapons, such as the M16, M4, AR10, M2, M107s and the like. For repeating weapons to properly cycle, the propellant charge must produce sufficient gas pressure and/or volume to accelerate the projectile and to cycle the firing mechanism. Typical supersonic chamber pressures will be in the range from 30,000 psi to 70,000 psi. With a reduced quantity of propellant, subsonic ammunition generally fails to produce sufficient pressure to properly cycle the firing mechanism.
Over the years, a number of attempts have been made to safely and economically address these issues. These attempts have included the introduction of inert fillers, expandable inner sleeves that occupy the empty space between the propellant and the projectile (U.S. Pat. No. 4,157,684), insertion of flexible tubing (U.S. Pat. No. 6,283,035), foamed inserts (U.S. Pat. No. 5,770,815), stepped down stages in the discharge end of cartridge casings (U.S. Pat. No. 5,822,904), or complicated three and more component cartridges with rupturable walls and other complicated features (U.S. Pat. No. 4,958,567), all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Another approach has been to use standard cartridges in combination with non-standard propellants, such as is exemplified by U.S. Pat. Pub. No 2003/0131751, the disclosure of which is also incorporated herein by reference.
The result of such prior attempts to solve the production of reliable subsonic cartridges have been subsonic rounds that have a larger spread in velocity and thus less accuracy potential than what is desired. Moreover, associated production costs can be significantly greater than full velocity rounds because of the large number of additional manufacturing steps required to insert and secure the inserts used, or to construct the complicated shell casings required. Accordingly, a need exists to develop solutions that make it possible to manufacture better and more price competitive subsonic ammunition than previously available.
The current invention is directed to a novel subsonic casing for an ammunition article capable of being formed at least partially of a polymeric material.
In some embodiments, the invention is directed to a subsonic ammunition article including
In one such embodiment, the polymeric material additionally includes at least one additive selected from plasticizers, lubricants, molding agents, fillers, thermo-oxidative stabilizers, flame-retardants, coloring agents, compatibilizers, impact modifiers, release agents, reinforcing fibers.
In another such embodiment, the article additionally includes one or more projectiles fitted in the second end. In such an embodiment, the projectile upon firing does not exceed the velocity of 1086 feet per second at standard atmospheric conditions. In another such embodiment the projectile is secured to the casing by a interconnection selected from the group consisting of mechanical interference, adhesive, ultrasonic welding, the combination of molding in place and adhesive, and hot crimping after the act of molding.
In still another such embodiment, the polymeric material comprises a material selected from the group consisting of polyphenylsulfone, polycarbonate, and polyamide. In such an embodiment, the polymeric material may include a translucent or transparent polymer. In another such embodiment, the polymeric material may include a polymeric material possessing a glass transition temperature of less than 250° C.
In yet another such embodiment, the cap and the caselet are joined using one of either a snap fit or threads. In one such embodiment, the ammunition article headspace is adjusted by rotating the threads clockwise and/or counterclockwise until a desired headspace distance is reached.
In still yet another such embodiment, the space defined between the outer wall of the caselet and the wall of the propellant chamber is formed of a solid material.
In still yet another such embodiment, the space defined between the outer wall of the caselet and the wall of the propellant chamber includes one of either voids or ribs.
In still yet another such embodiment, the propellant chamber comprises multiple separate internal volumes each in combustible communication with the primer.
In still yet another such embodiment, the propellant chamber has a radial cross-section selected from the group consisting of circular, ovoid, octagonal, hexagonal, triangular, and square. In one such embodiment, the radial cross-section of the propellant chamber is irregular along its longitudinal length. In another such embodiment, the radial size of the propellant chamber tapers along its longitudinal direction.
In other embodiments, the propellant chamber is formed of a separate restrictor body disposed within the internal cavity of the casing.
In one such embodiment, the caselet and restrictor body are formed of different polymeric materials.
In another such embodiment, the caselet and restrictor body are formed from the same polymeric material.
In still other embodiments, the propellant chamber and caselet are formed of a single integral caselet body.
In one such embodiment, the single integral caselet body is manufactured from two or more polymeric materials in a blend mixture.
In another such embodiment, the single integral caselet body is manufactured from two or more polymeric materials in distinct layers.
In still another such embodiment, the cap and the single integral caselet body are joined using one of either a snap fit or threads.
In yet other embodiments, the propellant chamber, caselet and cap are of a single integral casing body.
In one such embodiment, the single integral casing body is manufactured from two or more polymeric materials in a blend mixture.
In another such embodiment, the single integral casing body is manufactured from two or more polymeric materials in distinct layers.
In still another such embodiment, a metallic component is used to separate the primer from the other components of the case.
In still yet other embodiments, the invention is directed to a method of reusing a subsonic ammunition article including:
In one such embodiment, the cap and casing are threadingly interconnected.
In another such embodiment, the headspace of the ammunition article is adjusted by rotating the threads clockwise and/or counterclockwise until a desired headspace distance is reached.
The description will be more fully understood with reference to the following figures, which are presented as exemplary embodiments of the invention and should not be construed as a complete recitation of the scope of the invention, wherein:
The current invention is directed to a subsonic ammunition cartridge casing having an engineered internal volume designed to allow for the introduction of precisely the amount of propellant necessary at precisely the desired location to reproducibly produce the desired projectile velocity and internal pressure. More specifically, the current invention provides a shell casing having an engineered internal propellant cavity built into the internal body of the casing itself that does not necessarily depend on the introduction of a separate volume reducing device such as tubing, filler, foam filler and the like. This ensures the integrity of the case, does not result in anything being expelled through the muzzle of the weapon other than the projectile, does not have any burning or combusting components, allows for very precise control of the internal volume and thus chamber pressure, and is economical to produce.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “ammunition article” as used herein refers to a complete, assembled round or cartridge of ammunition that is ready to be loaded into a firearm and fired, including cap, casing, propellant, projectile, etc. An ammunition article may be a live round fitted with a projectile, or a blank round with no projectile. An ammunition article may be any caliber of pistol or rifle ammunition and may also be other types such as non-lethal rounds, rounds containing rubber bullets, rounds containing multiple projectiles (shot), and rounds containing projectiles other than bullets such as fluid-filled canisters and capsules. The “cartridge casing” is the portion of an ammunition article that remains intact after firing. A cartridge casing may be one-piece or multi-piece.
Also for the purposes of the present invention, the term “subsonic ammunition” as used herein refers to a specialized type of ammunition with projectile velocities of less than the speed of sound. The speed of sound is variable depending on the altitude and atmospheric conditions but is generally in the range of 1,000-1,100 feet per second (fps). For example, while traditional 7.62 mm ammunition generates projectile velocities of 2000-3000 fps, the subsonic ammunition would generally generate projectile velocities of less than 1070 fps.
A traditional cartridge casing, as shown in
In discussing a casing it is useful to define two regions, the “neck” portion of the cartridge casing (designated as 14) near the open end of the casing where the projectile is fitted, and a “body” portion (designated as 15) near where the caselet meets the cap. A key guidance of this invention is a relationship between the wall thicknesses along these two regions 14 and 15. The wall thicknesses in region 15 are represented by the minimum wall thickness of the body portion of the cartridge case and is designated “B”. The average thickness of the neck portion 14 is designated “N”. The relationship between the two is a ratio of dividing the “B” by “N” and is designated Ratio B/N. Typical B/N values for traditional cartridge casings are given in Table I, below.
An examination of the values in Table I shows that neck thicknesses (N) are in general larger than the body wall thicknesses (B). It is readily apparent from the Table I that this relationship holds across the spectrum of calibers. All of the calibers show this Ratio to be at or below 0.95, with smaller calibers showing progressively smaller Ratio values.
Hybrid polymer-metal cartridge casings (
It has now been determined that a reliable, economic subsonic cartridge casing may be produced by the careful design and construction of an engineered internal propellant chamber within the overall internal volume of the casing. In particular, it has been found that producing an engineered internal propellant chamber having an internal volume that is at least 20% reduced in comparison with the equivalent supersonic metallic, hybrid or polymeric casing of the same caliber, while simultaneously ensuring that the cartridge casing overall has a B/N ratio greater than 3 creates an optimal internal geometry for propellant discharge in subsonic ammunition applications. In addition, using such an integrated and engineered internal propellant chamber allows the ammunition manufacturer to assemble the cartridge casing in a rapid fashion without the need for additional manufacturing steps or complex design parameters.
In accordance with this understanding, and referencing for illustrative purposed only
Although the above discussion focused on the overall elements of the subsonic casing of the instant invention, and the critical engineered propellant volume, it should be understood that the actual construction of the engineered propellant volume, and its integration into the overall casing may take a number of suitable forms. First,
More preferred embodiments of the invention incorporate a cartridge casing wherein the internal propellant volume is an integral portion of the caselet.
Regardless of how the engineered propellant volume is formed, in such hybrid casings, a polymeric caselet constitutes the forward portion of a cartridge casing, and a metallic cap forms the closed, rearward casing portion. The proportion of plastic to metal can vary, a larger percentage of plastic being preferred to maximize weight reduction, corrosion resistance, and other advantages of plastics. The amount of metal present is determined by the smallest metal cap size necessary to prevent cartridge failure during firing. Non-limiting amounts of polymeric material in a cartridge casing by weight are about 10%, more preferably about 20%, even more preferably about 30%, still more preferably about 40%, yet more preferably about 50%, even more preferably about 60%, more preferably about 70% and up.
For such hybrid casings, many prior art methods are known for attaching the cap and caselet portions of an ammunition cartridge casing. Any method of attaching the caselet and cap is acceptable provided that the two components are joined securely and that gaseous combustion products are not allowed to escape through the assembled casing upon firing. Possible securing methods include, but are not limited to, mechanical interlocking methods such as ribs and threads, adhesives, molding in place, heat crimping, ultrasonic welding, friction welding etc. These and other suitable methods for securing individual pieces of a two-piece or multi-piece cartridge casing are useful in the practice of the present invention.
An even more preferred embodiments of the invention comprises a subsonic cartridge casing that eliminates the need for the metallic cap and is injection molded in its entirety.
It is notable that given the extreme nature of the application, a useful design must perform perfectly a great majority of time. Preferably, polymeric cartridge casings will survive more than 99% of live ammunition firings; more preferably, more than 99.9%; even more preferably, more than 99.99%; still more preferably, more than 99.999%. Even higher success rates are more preferable, the most preferable scenario being 100% casing survival. It is also important to note that this design alone is not the only factor guiding the suitability of a given material for polymeric case material, but has to be viewed in the context of additional factors such as material selection, creep resistance, melting and glass transition temperature points, chemical resistance, dimensional stability, particular application requirements, coefficient of friction between the chamber and the case, usage at extreme high temperatures such as 125° F., 140° F. or even 160 and 165° F., extreme low temperatures such as −25° F., −40° F. or even −65° F. and the like.
Suitable polymeric materials, for both the cap or caselet may be selected from any number of polymeric materials. Non limiting examples include polyamides, polyimides, polyesters, polycarbonates, polysulfones, polylactones, polyacetals, acrylontrile/butadiene/styrene copolymer resins, polyphenylene oxides, ethylene/carbon monoxide copolymers, polyphenylene sulfides, polystyrene, styrene/acrylonitrile copolymer resins, styrene/maleic anhydride copolymer resins, aromatic polyketones and mixtures thereof. Preferred embodiments will be manufactured from any polymer with a glass transition temperature of less than 250° C. Particularly suitable materials include polyphenylsulfones, polycarbonates and polyamides.
It will also be recognized that in any of the embodiments described above, the outer wall and inner volume occupying portions of the caselet need not necessarily be of the same polymeric material. For example, the caselet outer wall could be made of polymers with higher temperature resistance to resist the hot chamber conditions, while the inner volume occupying portion of the caselet (or in those embodiments with a separate element the restrictor) could be manufactured out of low cost polymers or be made with voids or ribs to reduce the amount of material used. One skilled in the art will also readily observe that different or identical coloring of the polymers used could aid in identification or marketing of the ammunition of the current invention. Another embodiment of this invention would be the usage of transparent or translucent polymers, allowing for easy identification of the propellant level.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the polymeric caselet is injection molded from a suitable polymeric material, such as polyphenylsulfone (commercially available from Solvay Advanced Polymers, LLC under a trade name of Radel R), polycarbonate (commercially available from SABIC under a trade name of Lexan or Lexan EXL) or polyamide (commercially available from DuPont under a trade name of Zytel). A casing cap is fabricated from aluminum, steel, or brass, and designed to receive a primer. The caselet and cap are securely joined to form the cartridge casing. The casing is loaded with a propellant charge, and a projectile is inserted into the open end and secured.
In terms of cap materials, several metals are useful for fabrication of the cap portion of a two-piece ammunition cartridge casing. These include brass and various steel and aluminum alloys and they all work satisfactorily. According to the present invention, the cap portion of the cartridge casings may be made of any material that is mechanically capable of withstanding a firing event. Non-limiting cap materials include any grade of brass, steel and steel alloys, aluminum and its alloys, ceramics, composites, and others. Of course, polymeric or polymer composite materials that are found to have sufficient mechanical properties for use as cartridge caps would also be useful in the practice of the present invention.
Turning to the construction of the cartridge case, according to the present invention, polymeric materials may comprise any portion of an ammunition cartridge casing, as long as the engineered propellant volume follows the restrictions and the overall casing follows the B/N guidance disclosed herein. Because of the more stringent mechanical demands on the bottom or base end of the cartridge as compared to the top end which secures the projectile, a two-piece or multi-piece cartridge casing may be preferred in which one piece is a high strength material that forms the base of the casing, e.g. the base may comprise a metal or a polymeric or composite material. For clarity, base is the portion of the casing that contains the primer and is opposite of the projectile end of the casing, as shown in any of the figures, for example.
In addition, although engineered propellant chambers are shown and described that comprise a single cylindrical cavity, it should be understood that this is merely meant to be illustrative. Other single or multiple engineered propellant chambers having any suitable cross-sectional shape may be used within the subsonic casings of the instant invention, such as, for example, hexagonal, triangular, square, etc. Likewise, the cross-section of the engineered propellant chamber need not be uniform along the longitudinal length of the casing. The dimensions of the engineered propellant volume could taper from proximal to distal ends, or from distal to proximal ends, or a series of interconnected chambers of propellant could be formed. In short, any size shape or number of engineered propellant chambers may be used providing these engineered propellant volumes or chamber satisfy the overall volume limitations described herein, and providing the overall casing meet the B/N ratio criteria set forth herein.
Finally, although three exemplary calibers are shown in Table I, above, it should be understood that many different types of ammunition articles are provided by the present invention. For example, polymeric materials that meet design guidelines of the invention may be used to produce subsonic ammunition components for various calibers of firearms. Non limiting examples include .22, .22-250, .223, .243, .25-06, .270, .300, .30-30, .30-40, 30.06, .303, .308, .357, .38, .40, .44, .45, .45-70, .50 BMG, 5.45 mm, 5.56 mm, 6.5 mm, 6.8 mm, 7 mm, 7.62 mm, 8 mm, 9 mm, 10 mm, 12.7 mm, 14.5 mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, 30 mm, 40 mm and others.
The person skilled in the art will recognize that additional embodiments according to the invention are contemplated as being within the scope of the foregoing generic disclosure, and no disclaimer is in any way intended by the foregoing, non-limiting examples.
Methods and Materials
Testing polymer ammunition casing produced using the design of the present invention is done by firing fully assembled live ammunition articles. First, designs, which have been identified as useful for subsonic casing components, are molded using standard methods and equipment (e.g., injection molding) to form polymeric cartridge caselets. The caselets are then joined to metallic caps. The resulting cartridges are loaded with a primer and a propellant charge, the type and amount of which can be readily determined by a skilled artisan. A projectile is inserted into the open end of the cartridge and secured by mechanical, adhesive, ultrasonic, vibratory or heat welding or any other suitable method. The article is thus prepared for test firing. Any size, caliber, or type of ammunition article can be assembled for live testing.
Test firing subsonic polymer cased ammunition provided by this invention can be performed using any type of firearm corresponding to the size or caliber of the article produced. Ammunition articles can be test fired from a single shot firearm, a semi-automatic firearm, or an automatic firearm. Ammunition may be fired individually or from a clip, magazine, or belt containing multiple ammunition articles. Articles may be fired intermittently or in rapid succession; the rate of fire is limited only by the capabilities of the firearm. Any number of standard brass ammunition articles may be fired prior to loading polymer cased ammunition articles to preheat the firearm chamber for testing under simulated sustained rapid-fire conditions.
Ten lightweight polymeric ammunition articles (.308 caliber/7.62 mm) are assembled from injection molded caselets, polymeric restrictors and caps machined from cold headed brass blanks (C26000). Each cap has a pre-installed primer (CCI #34). The caselets are designed with ridges around the lower portion which create a snap interference fit with corresponding grooves on the cap interior, thus joining the caselet and cap securely. The cartridges are then filled with propellant (10 grains of WC 842). After loading the propellant, the projectiles (180 grains) are inserted into the cartridge and attached using an adhesive. The caselet has the following nominal dimensions: minimum wall thickness (B) of 0.190″ (41 1/1000th of an inch) and neck thickness (N) of 0.017″ (17 1/1000th of an inch). The B/N ratio of the design is ˜11.2. The interior volume of the case is approximately 80% reduced in comparison to the equivalent supersonic round.
Ammunition articles are fired in a SCAR-17 and projectile velocities recorded. All of the velocities are less than 1,070 feet per second and rounds are all deemed subsonic. The ammunition cycles the weapon action without any issues.
Ten lightweight polymeric ammunition articles (.308 caliber/7.62 mm) are assembled from injection molded caselets, polymeric restrictors and caps machined from cold headed brass blanks (C26000). Each cap has a pre-installed primer (CCI #34). The caselets are designed with ridges around the lower portion which create a snap interference fit with corresponding grooves on the cap interior, thus joining the caselet and cap securely. The cartridges are then filled with propellant (10 grains of WC 842). After loading the propellant, the projectiles (180 grains) are inserted into the cartridge and attached using an adhesive. The caselet has the following nominal dimensions: minimum wall thickness (B) of 0.100″ (41 1/1000th of an inch) and neck thickness (N) of 0.017″ (17 1/1000th of an inch). The B/N ratio of the design is ˜5.8. The interior volume of the case is approximately 50% reduced in comparison to the equivalent supersonic round.
Ammunition articles are fired in a SCAR-17 and projectile velocities recorded. All of the velocities are less than 1,070 feet per second and rounds were all deemed subsonic. The ammunition does not cycle the weapon action and is operated manually.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the foregoing examples and descriptions of various preferred embodiments of the present invention are merely illustrative of the invention as a whole, and that variations in the steps and various components of the present invention may be made within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described herein but, rather, is defined by the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a division application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/561,947, filed Jul. 30, 2012, which application claimed priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/512,553, filed Jul. 28, 2011, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2455080 | Miller | Nov 1948 | A |
3060856 | Dunn | Oct 1962 | A |
3144827 | Boutwell | Aug 1964 | A |
3175901 | Jesmont et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3485170 | Scanlon | Dec 1969 | A |
3609904 | Scanlon | Oct 1971 | A |
3675576 | Whitney | Jul 1972 | A |
3745924 | Scanlon | Jul 1973 | A |
3749023 | Kawaguchi et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3989017 | Reece | Nov 1976 | A |
3989792 | San Miguel | Nov 1976 | A |
3990366 | Scanlon | Nov 1976 | A |
4065437 | Blinne et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4108837 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4147107 | Ringdal | Apr 1979 | A |
4157684 | Clausser | Jun 1979 | A |
4175175 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4228218 | Takayanagi et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4308847 | Ruizzo | Jan 1982 | A |
4326462 | Garcia et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4565131 | Buchner | Jan 1986 | A |
4569288 | Grelle et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4574703 | Halverson | Mar 1986 | A |
4614157 | Grelle et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4711271 | Weisenbarger et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4726296 | Leshner et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4809612 | Ballreich et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4839435 | Gergen et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4867065 | Kaltmann et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4897448 | Romance | Jan 1990 | A |
4958567 | Olson | Sep 1990 | A |
4969386 | Sandstrom et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5033386 | Vatsvog | Jul 1991 | A |
5062343 | Sjoberg et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5129382 | Stamps et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5151555 | Vatsvog | Sep 1992 | A |
5161512 | Adam et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5175040 | Harpell et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5190018 | Costello et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5196252 | Harpell | Mar 1993 | A |
5227457 | Marrocco, III et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5259288 | Vatsvog | Nov 1993 | A |
5404913 | Gilligan | Apr 1995 | A |
5434224 | McGrail et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5471905 | Martin | Dec 1995 | A |
5496893 | Gagne et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5512630 | Gagne et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519094 | Tseng et al. | May 1996 | A |
5539048 | Gagne et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5558765 | Twardzik | Sep 1996 | A |
5565543 | Marrocco et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5585450 | Oaks et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5616650 | Becker et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625010 | Gagne et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5637226 | Adam et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646231 | Marrocco, III et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646232 | Marrocco, III et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654392 | Marrocco, III et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659005 | Marrocco, III et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668245 | Marrocco et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670564 | Gagne et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5691401 | Morita et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5721335 | Marrocco, III et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5731400 | Marrocco, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5755095 | Maurer | May 1998 | A |
5756581 | Marrocco, III et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760131 | Marrocco, III et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770815 | Watson, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5789521 | Marrocco, III et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5822904 | Beal | Oct 1998 | A |
5824744 | Gagne et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827527 | Leonard | Oct 1998 | A |
5827927 | Gagne et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830945 | Gagne et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5869592 | Gagne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5886130 | Trimmer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5976437 | Marrocco, III et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6087467 | Marrocco, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6135097 | Ruizzo, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6228970 | Savariar | May 2001 | B1 |
6283035 | Olson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6367441 | Hoshiba et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387985 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6441099 | Connell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6525125 | Giardello et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6528145 | Berger et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6586554 | Takahashi | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6630538 | Ellul et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6752084 | Husseini et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6845716 | Husseini et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7610858 | Chung | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7992498 | Ruhlman et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8240252 | Maljkovic et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8408137 | Battaglia | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8443730 | Padgett | May 2013 | B2 |
8561543 | Burrow | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8763535 | Padgett | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8813650 | Maljkovic et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8869702 | Padgett | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9032855 | Foren et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9182204 | Maljkovic | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9188412 | Maljkovic | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20010013299 | Husseini et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020035946 | Jamison et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030019385 | LeaSure et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030131751 | MacKerell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181603 | Venderbosch et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040096539 | McCaffrey et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040211668 | Montminy et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050005807 | Wiley et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050016414 | Leitner-Wise | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049355 | Tang et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066805 | Park et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050188879 | Wiley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060013977 | Duke et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060056958 | Gaines et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069236 | Brunelle et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060102041 | Wiley et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105183 | Chu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060207464 | Maljkovic et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070172677 | Biermann et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070261587 | Chung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080017026 | Dondlinger et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090211483 | Kramer | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100016518 | El-Hibri et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100282112 | Battaglia | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110214583 | Dutch | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120024183 | Klein | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120052222 | Gagne | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120111219 | Burrow et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120180687 | Padgett | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180688 | Padgett | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130014664 | Padgett et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014665 | Maljkovic et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130186294 | Davies et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140060372 | Padgett et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140060373 | Maljkovic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140076188 | Maljkovic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140290522 | Padgett et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150033970 | Maljkovic et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150047527 | Padgett | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150285604 | Bosarge et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150316361 | Maljkovic | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160040970 | Maljkovic et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2705235 | Aug 1978 | DE |
4015542 | Nov 1991 | DE |
222827 | May 1991 | EP |
436111 | Jul 1991 | EP |
861071 | Jan 1941 | FR |
672706 | May 1952 | GB |
732633 | Jun 1955 | GB |
1568545 | May 1980 | GB |
8300213 | Jan 1983 | WO |
8606466 | Nov 1986 | WO |
8907496 | Aug 1989 | WO |
9207024 | Apr 1992 | WO |
9513516 | May 1995 | WO |
9839250 | Sep 1998 | WO |
2008090505 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2013016730 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2015130409 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015154079 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12817294.7, Report completed Aug. 12, 2014, Mailed Aug. 19, 2014, 7 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/072810, completed Oct. 19, 2008, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/048848, completed Oct. 12, 2012, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2015/0011238, Report Completed Sep. 1, 2015, Mailed Sep. 30, 2015, 10 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2015/024528, Report Completed Jun. 16, 2015, Mailed Jul. 8, 2015, 7 pgs. |
IPRP for International Application No. PCT/US2012/048848, Search Completed Jan. 28, 2014, 7 pgs. |
“A Guide to Polycarbonate in General”, Engineering Polymer Specialists Polymer Technology & Services, LLC, pp. 1-5. |
“Development Product Makrolon® DPI-1848, Polycarbonate Copolymer Resin General Purpose Grade”, Bayer Polymers, May 2003, pp. 1-4. |
“GE Plastics, Lexan® EXL9330 Americas: Commercial”, General Electric Company, Sep 29, 2004, pp. 1-5. |
“Low Temperature Notched Izod Impact of RADEL R-5xxx Resins”, File No. 2803, Solvay Advanced Polymers, L.L.C., Jan. 7, 1999, 1 pg. |
“Preliminary Product Data, RTP 1899A X 83675 Polycarbonate/Acrylic Alloy (PC/PMMA) Thin Wall Grade”, RTP Company Product Data Sheet, available at http://www.rtpcompany.com/info/data/1800A/RTP1899AX83675.htm, printed, Mar. 7, 2005, 5 pgs. |
“Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics,1”, ASTM Designation: D256-00, Jan. 2001, pp. 1-19. |
Baldwin et al., “A microcellular processing study of poly(ethylene terephthalate) in the amorphous and semicrystalline states. Pat I: microcell nucleation”, Society of Plastics Engineers, Polymer Engingeering and Science (1996), vol. 36 (11), pp. 1437-1445. |
Naitove, “Self-reinforcing thermoplastic is harder, stronger, stiffer without added fibers”, Plastics Technology, Gardner Publication Inc., Jul. 2003, 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160025464 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61512553 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13561947 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 14876480 | US |