This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/333,616, filed May 9, 2016.
The present invention is related to a product and process for evaluating subsurface environments such as microbials, water and gas. The product is a single Sampler that may be used in, but is not limited to shallow and deep water wells, production wells (e.g. shale or coalbed methane wells), monitoring wells and contaminated aquifers. More particularly, the present invention relates to investigating and monitoring microbial stimulation (e.g. increased methane production) downhole.
Global warming has been linked to greenhouse gas such as carbon dioxide that in excess trap heat resulting in warming of the atmosphere. The excess has been linked to burning of coal that provides other environmental impacts and human health effects due to release of other gases such as Sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury and other chemical products contributing to hazards such as acid rain and lung cancer.
Steps to mitigate these environmental hazards have been found by extracting natural gas such as methane that is released from coal beds. This release of methane has been found to result from coal degradation partly due to specific bacterial populations and enzymes. With the discovery that approximately 20% of natural gas is microbial in origin, identifying the specific microbial population that promotes degradation is critical, and has led to development of Microbial Enhanced Coal Bed Methane (MeCBM), which involves stimulating microorganisms to produce additional CBM from existing production wells.
Cost effective techniques to identify microbials have been found in DNA-sequencing. Not only has this technology been beneficial in isolating and identifying microbial communities for CBM studies, but has been applied in microbial ecology in deep waters evolutionary research.
Unfortunately, sampling subsurface microbial communities has been difficult due to studies relying solely on water and core samples to access or study the active subsurface microbial community. However, present Samplers that only acquire water do not adequately reflect the microbial densities and activities in the subsurface at selected locations. Microbials have been found to grow and attach to the subsurfaces found at the desired location and are less likely to be represented in sufficient numbers in mere water samples. Use of core samples are often prohibitively expensive to obtain, and difficult to collect in conditions similar to the desired environment. In instances, where the target area is a deep subsurface such as coal beds, the environment requires the core and water to be anaerobic, which is a costly process to achieve and to keep aseptic. Failure to duplicate the sample's environmental conditions including pressure, gas and temperature may change and destroy microbial attached to the core.
Current use of Samplers and approaches to examine and investigate environments, such as the ocean, wells, reservoir conditions and indigenous, subsurface microbial communities have been restricted and limited.
Various Samplers are known in the art, but are not constructed and operative in a manner that prevents contamination of the sampled media or that allows for several samples to be collected at various depths within a hole or free body of water like the ocean or lake without requiring the Sampler to be in contact with an upper floor of a subsurface.
An example of a sampler is shown in
Alternatively, Samplers such as a diffusive microbial Sampler (DMS) may be capable of being closed mechanically due to weights located at its bottom pulling the Sampler closed. When the Sampler is lowered to a target having a ground floor, the weights at the bottom push up on the Sampler opening it, and allowing water or a targeted media to enter its chamber. After a period, the Sampler is then retrieved, the force of gravity of the weights pulls down on Sampler, and sliding chamber closed as it is being lifted. The mechanical closure results in a poor sealing that allows for contaminants to enter the sampling chamber when the component is lowered or retrieved from a specific target depth resulting from differing microbials and conditions found at various depths.
Likewise, in both Samplers, during testing of the collected media, in-situ conditions are not maintained. Changes in those conditions may result in release of or change of gas, pressure, acidity, change or loss of microbials. Such changes, and introduction of potential contaminants will result in unwanted constituents that may distort the results of the experiment and data collected.
The development of a single, multifunctional Subsurface Environment Sampler that may be used in shallow or deep depths in down-well or oceans that permit incubation of sediment, core and gas sealed containment has emerged as an alternative method to sample subsurface microbial communities that minimizes cost and contamination issues associated with traditional methods by maintaining in-situ testing conditions while allowing the sampler to serve as a reactor for on or off-site testing.
In order to solve the above mentioned problem, the present invention provides a Sampler completely controlled where its collection chamber is able to be sealed and opened, multiple times at various depths and times prior to being retrieved. Test such as identifications of gasses or microbial communities as well examining the effects of an introduction of a substance into a specific subsurface environment such as a nutrient may be performed on the Sampler either at a field site or a lab while maintaining in-situ conditions.
The Sampler disclosed by the present invention comprises a collection chamber with removable fittings inserted into ports within an end cap of the chamber. The size and shape of the Sampler may vary. Preferably the fluid volume that may be contained in the Sampler is 250 ml. The collection chamber contains a mechanical gasket such as an O-ring made of a compressible material elastomer or rubber protruding from its ends enabling sealing of the Sampler at depths greater than 250 feet. The chamber is placed within the mated housings including an actuator, having slots formed in one end of the housings to allow for a media to enter the chamber. Any known down-hole lowering mechanism preferably a cable reel or tool string may be a connected to the Sampler to lower or retrieve the Sampler at a desired depth. For use of wireline cables that provide transmits power and information, it can optionally be attached to a control box. Power and data may be transmitted wirelessly or through wires within the cable to the actuator or optional probes placed within the Sampler like PH, ORP or methane sensors as the source for in-situ testing. When power is transmitted to the actuator, the Sampler is signaled to either close by triggering the actuator's piston to extend pushing a connected chamber away from the slots, causing pressure exerted on the mechanical gasket to seal the chamber air tight within the housing or closed by retracting the piston causing the chamber to be pulled within slots. The ability to open and close may be triggered from control box on the ground attached to cable or through known wireless technologies such radio frequency (rf) by Integrated Circuit and board (PCB) within the Sampler connected to the actuator and portable power supply.
Another aspect of the present invention is that multiple collection chambers may be placed within the mated housings. Actuators that connect to the chambers may be placed either in one end of a housing within its perimeter, or each Actuator may be located at opposite ends of the mated housings. Slots may be located on both separate housings. Each Actuator may be connected to the same or different power and signal sources enabling each chamber to be either opened or closed at the same or different times.
The ability of a single Sampler to be opened and closed at multiple sites, to provide an air tight sealed chamber where contents within the chamber may be accessed at in-situ conditions provides for multiple advantages and uses.
The Sampler may be lowered in a dry or fluid environment, opened for a period of time (seconds, minutes, days, weeks, months) and closed to capture either fluids or gases. Probes within the Sampler may be used to transmit data of the contents without removal of the Sampler. Additionally, the Sampler may be retrieved and other probes may connected to the various fittings based on the desired test.
In areas where there is concern of contamination, such as studying tracking or methane production on its effects on water ways, aquifers or wells, the Sampler may be used to acquire water at specific depths maintaining in-situ conditions. The Sampler may be retrieved from its lowered depths, and the mated housing detached to allow for ease of handling. The closed housing may flipped such that the fittings connected to the collection chamber extend upward. A cap on the housing end covering ports and, optional interchangeable fittings may be removed. Fittings may be added to ports for connection to other apparatus to fill, pressurize, depressurize or degas the chamber. An apparatus for gas release such as a syringe may inserted into an air-lock fitting. Gas will rise filling the space within the syringe. The syringe may then pulled out and inserted into a gas analyzer such as a chromatograph.
Advantage of the Sampler, includes studying, the effects of incubating a certain media like coal, or glass beads and then injecting nutrient amendments in the chamber when sealed. Cores acquired at a specific depth may be placed in the screened collection chamber of the Sampler. The chamber due to the confined space allows for the core to maintain its integrity when placed in fluid like water, brines, and liquids to serve as a median for microbials to colonize and or form biofilm. The chamber is inserted back into a housing mating a first and second housings together. The Sampler may then be lowered to the specific depth and opened without contact with a subsurface floor. Over a specific time, the media will achieve the same condition as like material in the targeted area. Due to the Sampler's enclosure of its chamber and seal, it will maintain in-situ conditions while being retrieved. Optionally a thermal sleeve may be placed around the retrieved Sampler to allow it to incubate where temperature is a concern. The material that entered the collected chamber may then be studied for various test such as study coal degradation and microbial density either onsite, a lab or at a remote facility. Various substances or amendments such a nutrient may be inserted into the chamber to study its effects. The inserted substance may be lowered back to a specific subsurface location and opened to introduce the amendment to the targeted subsurface environment. After a predetermined sampling time, the Sampler may be then closed to study its effects on the media, such as for example coal bed methane enhancement. Optionally amendments may be inserted and examined within the Sampler, using the chamber solely as the reactor to study effects without placing Sampler back to the target area, since the Sampler through its ports allows of access and testing to be done in the Samplers Chamber set at in-situ conditions.
Once the Sampler has captured the selected subsurface environmental parameters of interest, the sampler is retrieved. It is contemplated that the Sampler may be used with or without the third housing in dry and fluid environments for various test evaluated at different times. The mated housings may be disassembled allowing for the sealed chamber, and its housing to be quickly replaced with another unit to eliminate delay of further testing. End caps on the sealed part of the Sampler may be removed allowing access to the chamber's, ports or fittings for various test. Since the chamber is sealed, the Sampler may be accessed onsite or transported offsite or to a remote facility for later retrieval or to serve as a reactor. By maintaining in-situ conditions, the Sampler is able to reduce factors that can impact sample, distort data, and reduce cost by eliminating the need to prepare in advance media that mirrors the selected environment of interest like anaerobic media.
The subject matter and its advantages will become more apparent from the following detailed description and claims particularly when considered in light of the accompanying drawings:
As shown in
As shown in
While, the invention has been described and shown in terms of what are considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is understood that the invention covers various modifications and similar arrangements included within the scope of the appended claims.
The invention described herein was made by employees of the United States Government and may be manufactured and used by the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without payment of royalties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
166136 | Patterson | Jul 1875 | A |
767209 | Decker | Aug 1904 | A |
1211415 | Cross | Jan 1917 | A |
2374227 | Metcalf | Apr 1945 | A |
2376366 | Lawlor | May 1945 | A |
3556211 | Floyd | Jan 1971 | A |
3934468 | Brieger | Jan 1976 | A |
4050315 | Markfelt | Sep 1977 | A |
4210025 | Bimond | Jul 1980 | A |
4235244 | Abele | Nov 1980 | A |
4438654 | Torstensson | Mar 1984 | A |
4538683 | Chulick | Sep 1985 | A |
4669554 | Cordry | Jun 1987 | A |
4721157 | Berzin | Jan 1988 | A |
4804050 | Kerfoot | Feb 1989 | A |
4807707 | Handley | Feb 1989 | A |
4838079 | Harris | Jun 1989 | A |
5046568 | Cordry | Sep 1991 | A |
5058674 | Schultz | Oct 1991 | A |
5146998 | Cordry | Sep 1992 | A |
5168765 | Broussard | Dec 1992 | A |
5327981 | Morgan | Jul 1994 | A |
5337822 | Massie | Aug 1994 | A |
5337838 | Sorensen | Aug 1994 | A |
5440941 | Kalidindi | Aug 1995 | A |
5487314 | Phillips | Jan 1996 | A |
5487431 | Webb | Jan 1996 | A |
5587538 | Bratton | Dec 1996 | A |
5662166 | Shammai | Sep 1997 | A |
5889217 | Rossabi | Mar 1999 | A |
6085576 | Sunshine | Jul 2000 | A |
6189392 | Schultz | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196333 | Aardal | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230820 | Cordry | May 2001 | B1 |
6487920 | Robbat, Jr. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7234362 | Shinn, II | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7294259 | Cote | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7392719 | Lee | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8429986 | Lee | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8444937 | Tuli | May 2013 | B2 |
8646533 | Nguy | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8991483 | Irani | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9116087 | Haywood | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20040050185 | Tibbets | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040089079 | Engebretson | May 2004 | A1 |
20040129070 | Bolze | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060107770 | Lee | May 2006 | A1 |
20080076147 | El-Azizi | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090241658 | Irani | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110242530 | Tuli | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110259595 | Nguy | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110315372 | Church | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120031205 | Lee | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130029324 | Rajagopal | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130167666 | Jenkins | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130213645 | Proett | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130248181 | Getzlaf | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140027105 | Irani | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150075302 | Jenkins | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Harrison, W. D. et al, Water Resources Research 1981, 17, 1731-1736. |
Martin, J. B. et al, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 2004, 2, 398-405. |
Barnhart, E. P. et al, International Journal of Coal Geology 2013, 115, 64-70. |
Elliott Barnhart, Subsurface Environment Sampler for Improved In Situ Characterization of Subsurface Microbial Communities, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (Dec. 2016). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180348093 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |