This invention relates to subsurface supports which may be used to support bridges and culverts, and more particularly, to a subsurface support in the form of a platform that prevents scour type erosion which may develop from a body of moving water such as a river or stream.
Over time, rivers and streams continue to change course as these moving bodies of water erode the surrounding earth. One classic example of how a river may change course over time is the Colorado River and the formation of the Grand Canyon which has taken place over millions of years. Without intervention, all rivers and streams continue to change course as the force of moving water will erode surrounding earth in paths of least resistance.
When a structure is placed over a body of water, such as a bridge or culvert, it is necessary to take into account scour type erosion which will naturally take place. Such scour can occur in dramatic events such as floods, and will at least take place incrementally over time as the moving body of water continues to move particles of rock and soil downstream.
One of the most common means to ensure that a moving body of water such as a river stays its course through a built up area or at least through a manmade structure such as a bridge, is the use of a series of large boulders known as rip rap which may line the banks and/or bed of the river. Placing rip rap over an extended length of a river can be quite expensive and therefore infeasible. Such rip rap is typically quarried rock which must be transported to the work site and emplaced by heavy equipment. Due to recent environmental awareness, placing rip rap on the banks and bed of a stream can permanently alter not only the dynamic flow characteristics of the river, but also the ecological balance of flora and fauna which may reside or depend upon an undisturbed river bed and river banks. For migrating fish populations such as salmon, rip rap can significantly alter the dynamic flow characteristics of a stream to the extent that it makes migration difficult or impossible over certain stretches of a river. Another drawback with construction which utilizes rip rap is that emplacement of the rip rap will significantly alter water quality by at least temporarily increasing the amount of sediment which is suspended in the body of water. Certain populations of fish such as trout are particularly sensitive to water quality degradation. Because of such environmental concerns, a need has developed for the ability to prevent undesirable scour which will inevitably occur within a stream or river, yet provide manmade intervention in a manner that will not significantly alter either the characteristics of the stream or river, or the surrounding vegetation and terrain which runs adjacent to the stream bank.
In accordance with the present invention, a subsurface scour platform is provided for supporting bridge, culvert, and other manmade structures which must overly a body of moving water such as a river or stream. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, an excavation is made which extends in the direction of flow of the moving body of water and is spaced laterally away from the river/stream bank. The excavation may be undrained which means that water may be allowed to seep into the excavation from uprising ground water which may be present adjacent the body of water. A layer of stabilizing sheet like material is placed on the bottom surface of the undrained excavation. The sheet-like material may include materials such as wire mesh, geosynthetic sheets, or combinations of both. After the bottom of the excavation has been lined with the sheet material, a fill material such as open graded rock then fills the excavation. A remaining length of the sheet material is then folded over the upper surface of the fill material thereby enclosing the fill within a U-shaped enclosure. Preferably, the free end of the remaining length extends away from the body of water.
An abutment of a bridge may then be placed directly over a constructed scour platform. Alternatively, any other structure may be placed over the scour platform if it is necessary to span the body of water at that location. A platform may be built for each abutment as necessary.
The sheet material in combination with the aggregate will prevent or greatly reduce the natural scouring action of the body of water from extending beyond an emplaced platform. The platform is best suited for smaller streams and rivers, and the maximum depth of the excavation is preferably 3 to 6 feet. Perhaps with the exception of a major flood, excavations which are dug to this depth will prevent the scouring action of the body of water for a great period of time. There is no required distance in which excavations should be placed laterally from the edges or banks of the body of water; however, normal scouring action of the body of water may continue to occur at normal rates until the flow/current of the body of water actually reaches the interior edges of emplaced scour platforms.
Although in most circumstances it is desirable to place a platform on each opposite side of a river or stream, it may only be necessary to provide a platform on one side of the body of water. Additionally, the scour platform of the present invention may extend downstream a desired length depending upon where it is desired to prevent scour. Although the scour platform of the present invention is ideally suited to provide support for an overlying structure such as an abutment, the scour platforms may be used alone to prevent scour, and vegetation may be planted over the top of the platforms to restore the area to its natural state.
The width of the excavations can also be modified as necessary to provide the desired resistance against scour as well as to accommodate a particular sized structure which may be placed on the scour platform. In larger rivers, it may be necessary to extend the width of the excavations to better resist the scouring force provided by the body of water.
In another aspect of the invention, additional means may be provided to further prevent scour by use of a plurality of micropiles which are driven in the ground adjacent an emplaced scour platform.
There are many advantages to the scour platform of the present invention. One distinct advantage is that rip rap is not required to stabilize the flow of a river thereby providing a much more cost effective solution. Since the body of water itself is not disrupted during construction, the water quality of the body of water will remain unaffected at all stages of platform construction. Additionally, since an excavation does not need to be dewatered, the scour platform further provides a cost effective alternative because no equipment is required to pump water or to otherwise keep the excavation dry. The scour platform provides an adequate base support for an overlying structure such as an abutment. Use of a scour platform requires minimum disruption of the surrounding terrain thereby allowing the terrain to be more easily restored to its natural state, to include the return of vegetation or other natural objects.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from a review of the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
From the foregoing, it is apparent that a cost effective and ecologically friendly solution is provided to prevent undesirable scouring, as well as to provide support for an overlying structure such as an abutment. Accordingly, scouring can be prevented without having to divert the body of water, or otherwise modify an existing stream bed and banks. Additionally, the excavations may be undrained which also thereby simplifies construction and minimizes man and equipment requirements.
The foregoing invention has been described with respect to a particular preferred embodiment; however, it shall be understood that various other modifications may be made within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
571225 | Geisel | Nov 1896 | A |
3808624 | Barkdull, Jr. | May 1974 | A |
3981038 | Vidal | Sep 1976 | A |
4181995 | Zur | Jan 1980 | A |
4564313 | Niswander et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4564967 | Vidal | Jan 1986 | A |
4655637 | Vignocchi | Apr 1987 | A |
4993872 | Lockwood | Feb 1991 | A |
5044831 | Myles et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5549418 | Devine et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5713162 | Gallo et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6533498 | Quin | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6745421 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |