1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to mechanisms and methods for closing off a subsurface wellbore and, in particular aspects, to surface-controlled subsurface safety valves used within wellbores.
2. Description of the Related Art
Surface-controlled subsurface safety valves (SSSVs) are used to selectively close off lower portions of the flowbore of a production tubing string in the event of an emergency. These valves can then be reopened later when the emergency situation has been remedied and it is desired to reestablish flow through the flowbore. Common SSSV's are flapper-type valves that are biased closed by a spring mechanism and then reopened, under surface control, by an axially moveable flow tube. Although flapper valves have been in use for a long period of time, they continue to suffer from problems that prevent them from being an ideal solution in all situations. Because they are mechanical devices, their components are prone to damage during typical operation. Also, the flow path might become encrusted with scales or hydrates during production, which can cause the valve to become stuck in an open, closed, or partially open position.
Certain devices are known that utilize plugs that will block fluid flow through the flowbore and can be readily destroyed when needed. U.S. Pat. No. 6,026,903 issued to Shy et al., for example, discloses a frangible disappearing plug that can be ruptured and destroyed to reopen the flowbore of the well. However, this type of structure must be run into the well at the outset in order to be useful as a plug. This makes it unsuitable for use as an SSSV, since it could not be used to rapidly close off a lower portion of the flowbore in an emergency.
There is a need for an alternative to standard flapper-type surface controlled safety valves. There is a need for an alternative technique that can be used to establish a blockage within the flowbore of a well during operation in a substantially rapid manner under surface control to close a portion of the flowbore in the event of an emergency. This technique should also allow the flowbore to be reopened, if desired.
The present invention addresses the problems of the prior art.
The invention provides devices and methods for selectively closing and opening flow of production fluid (oil, gas, or water) through the flowbore of a production string by chemically altering the phase of fluid media flowing through the production tubing to form a substantially solid plug or blockage. In a preferred embodiment, the phase of the fluid media is altered by selectively injecting a predetermined catalyst into a portion of the flowbore wherein it is desired to create a plug or blockage. The composition of the catalyst will vary depending upon the type of media (oil, gas, water) that is flowing through the tubing. The blockage will typically form in a period of time that is short enough to essentially close off flow under emergency conditions.
When it is desired to remove the blockage, a dissolving agent is selectively added to the flowbore via a reversing sub to reverse the phase of the blockage from solid to liquid/gas. As the blockage is dissolved, flow is reestablished within the flowbore.
An exemplary production assembly 22 is shown that includes a production tubing string 24 that extends downwardly from a wellhead 26 through the wellbore 10. An annulus 28 is defined between the outer radial surface of the tubing string 24 and the casing 18. An axial flowbore 29 is defined within the tubing string 24. A production nipple 30 incorporated into the tubing string 24 is located adjacent the perforations 20. Packers 32 are set on each axial side of the production nipple 30. A surface controlled subsurface safety valve (SSSV) 34 is also incorporated into the production assembly 22 above the production nipple 30. Also incorporated into the production assembly 22 is a reversing sub 36 and a plug formation sub 38, the structure and function of which will be described in detail shortly.
The chamber refill conduit 62 extends from the surface 14 and is interconnected with the flow control valve 56 via an inlet 64 that is formed into the housing 40. The refill conduit 62 may incorporate a one-way fluid flow check valve 66 that allows fluid to be flowed toward the valve 56 but not away from it. It is noted that the valve control line 60 is operationally associated with surface-based components, including, for example, a controller (not shown) for operating the valve 56. The refill conduit 62 is operationally associated with a pump and fluid reservoir (not shown) for providing a flow of fluid along the refill conduit 62. The structure and operation of devices of this nature are well understood and, therefore, are not described in any further detail herein.
An annular piston member 68 is disposed within the annular chamber 50. Fluid seals 70 ensure fluid-tight sealing between the piston member 68 and the surrounding surfaces of the chamber 50. The piston member 68 provides an upper axial side 72 and a lower axial side 74. A compression spring 76 is disposed within the chamber 50 below the piston member 68 and contacts the lower side 74 of the piston member 68, thereby biasing the piston member 68 upwardly within the chamber 50. A catalyst fluid 78 initially resides within the chamber 50 above the piston member 68.
The composition of the catalyst fluid 78 will vary depending upon the makeup of the fluid media that is flowing through the flowbore 29. In the instance of natural gas production, fresh water is a preferred catalyst fluid 78 as its addition to natural gas will result in the formation of solid hydrates. In the instance of a natural gas/fresh water combination, it is preferred to locate the plug formation sub 38 proximate a preferred hydrate formation depth, which is typically at or near the mud line in a wellbore.
In the instance of a wellbore wherein crude oil is primarily being produced through the flowbore 29, a currently preferred catalyst fluid 78 would be naturally-occurring paraffins. Other suitable viscosifiers or precipitants, which are capable of forming a substantially solid plug when mixed with crude oil may also be used.
In order to create a blockage within the flowbore 26, the flow control valve 56 is actuated from the closed position (
Referring now to
When it is desired to remove or dissolve plug 80, the reversing sub 36 is actuated. The reversing sub 36 is constructed in a manner similar to the SSSV 34. It includes a housing 86 with a central flow passage 88 and surrounding annular chamber 90. Preferably, the multi-position fluid control valve 92, fluid inlet 94, and lateral fluid outlet 96 are located at the lower end of the reversing sub 36 rather than at the upper end as with the SSSV 34. The piston member 98 and compression spring 100 are preferably located at the upper end of the chamber 90. The chamber 90 is filled with a plug dissolving agent 102. The reversing sub 36 is actuated by control line 104, by which the control valve 92 is moved to the open position to allow the plug dissolving agent 102 to be exhausted into the flowbore 29 by urging of the spring 100 against the piston member 98. The plug dissolving agent 102 will tend to settle downwardly onto the plug 80, as indicated by arrows 106, and reopen the flowbore 29 to fluid passage.
The composition of the plug dissolving agent 102 will vary in accordance with the nature of the production media being flowed through the flowbore 29 and the composition of the plug 80. In the instance of a natural gas producing well, which would be closed with a hydrate plug, preferred plug dissolving agents include glycol, methyl-ethyl-glycol (MEG), diesel, and other suitable solvents. In the instance of a crude oil producing well, a paraffin solvent, such as diesel can be used. Alternatively, a heated fluid may be used as the plug dissolving agent 102 in order to raise the temperature of the paraffin above its melting point, thereby dissolving it. The particular temperature of the heated fluid needed to dissolve the plug 80 will very depending upon the particular composition of the plug 80.
It is noted that the SSSV 34, reversing sub 36, and plug formation sub 38 collectively form an SSSV system wherein a plug may be formed and removed for selective blockage of the flowbore 29. It is also noted that mixtures of oil, gas and water may require that the catalyst fluid 78 be made up of a suitable mixture of the components of the fluids that are suitable for mixing with the complimentary components of the fluid media flowing through the flowbore 29. For example, if the media flowing through the flowbore 36 were a mixture of 30% natural gas and 70% crude oil, the catalyst fluid 78 could be made up of a mixture of about 30% fresh water and about 70% paraffin, for example. Similarly, where there is mixed fluid media, the plug dissolving agent 102 will also be made up of a suitable combination of fluid components for dissolution of the plug 80. In the example of 30% natural gas and 70% crude oil, the plug dissolving agent 102 might be composed of a combination of 30% glycol, MEG, or diesel and 70% paraffin solvent.
Those of skill in the art will recognize that numerous modifications and changes may be made to the exemplary designs and embodiments described herein and that the invention is limited only by the claims that follow and any equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2609880 | Dyer | Sep 1952 | A |
3139931 | Simpson et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3614988 | Moore | Oct 1971 | A |
3709296 | Glenn, Jr. | Jan 1973 | A |
4083406 | Metz | Apr 1978 | A |
4119150 | Froelich | Oct 1978 | A |
4276934 | Fraser | Jul 1981 | A |
4674570 | Jackson | Jun 1987 | A |
4730675 | Wygant et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4741396 | Falxa | May 1988 | A |
4972906 | McDaniel | Nov 1990 | A |
5146985 | Alquie et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5307984 | Nagaoka et al. | May 1994 | A |
5358043 | Moradi-Araghi | Oct 1994 | A |
5358050 | Schmidt | Oct 1994 | A |
5897095 | Hickey | Apr 1999 | A |
6026903 | Shy | Feb 2000 | A |
6196315 | Surles et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6478088 | Hansen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488089 | Bour et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6818598 | Maberry et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6910537 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6991048 | Zupanick | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7303014 | Reddy et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20040007390 | Zupanick | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040262003 | Nguyen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060144591 | Gonzalez et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0722037 | Jul 1996 | EP |
WO 2005045183 | May 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070215352 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |