The invention relates to catheters designed for use in bodily vessels with tortuous paths, such as cerebral arteries. In particular, the invention relates to suction catheter systems comprising a guide catheter and a suction extension slidably disposed within the guide catheter.
Procedures in blood vessels of the brain are gaining use as an approach for ameliorating acute stroke events or other interventions in blood vessels in the brain. Blood vessels in the brain follow particularly tortuous paths which can increase the difficulty of reaching target locations in these vessels. Other vessels in a patient can also follow winding paths that increase the difficulty of reaching target locations.
Aspiration catheters have found use with respect to removal of clots from vessels. Furthermore, a significant reason for ischemic injury during percutaneous procedures can be generation of emboli that block smaller distal vessels. Aspiration catheters used alone or with embolic protection device can be effective to capture emboli generated during procedures. The delivery of effective devices to the small blood vessels of the brain to remove clots and/or to capture emboli remains challenging.
Ischemic strokes can be caused by clots within a cerebral artery. The clots block blood flow, and the blocked blood flow can deprive brain tissue of its blood supply. The clots can be thrombus that forms locally or an embolus that migrated from another location to the place of vessel obstruction. To reduce the effects of the cut off in blood supply to the tissue, time is an important factor. In particular, it is desirable to restore blood flow in as short of a period of time as possible. The cerebral artery system is a highly branched system of blood vessels connected to the interior carotid arteries. The cerebral arteries are also very circuitous. Medical treatment devices should be able to navigate along the circuitous route posed by the cerebral arteries for placement into the cerebral arteries.
In a first aspect, the invention pertains to a suction catheter system comprising a guide catheter and a suction extension. The guide catheter can comprise a tubular shaft with a central lumen having, a proximal end and a distal opening, and a proximal section operably connected with the proximal end of the tubular shaft and having fittings that connect to a suction device, wherein the tubular shaft comprises an engagement section having an inner diameter associated with the lumen extending through the engagement section. The suction extension can comprise a connecting section with a central lumen, a tubular extension comprising a tube that is connected with the tubular element of the connecting portion extends from the connecting portion in a distal direction, and a control structure comprising an elongated structure extending from the connecting section in a proximal direction. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the connecting section has a non-cylindrical cross section with a major outer diameter and a minor outer diameter smaller than the major outer diameter. The tubular extension can have a distal inner diameter that is from about 20 percent to about 90 percent of the guide catheter central lumen inner diameter, wherein the connecting section is configured to slide within the central lumen of the engagement section of the tubular shaft to change the relative position of the connecting section within the central lumen and provide for at least a portion of the suction extension to extend outward from the distal opening of the tubular shaft at appropriate configurations of the connecting section. In some embodiments, a suction lumen is formed extending from the fitting configured to connect to the suction device through a portion of the central lumen, the connecting section and the tubular extension to a distal opening of the tubular extension, and the connecting section engages the inner lumen of the engagement section of the guide catheter at two locations along the circumference.
In further embodiments, the invention pertains to a suction catheter system comprising a guide catheter and a suction extension. The guide catheter can comprise a tubular shaft with a central lumen having, a proximal end and a distal opening, and a proximal section operably connected with the proximal end of the tubular shaft and having fittings that connect to a suction device. The tubular shaft can comprise an engagement section having an inner diameter associated with the lumen extending through the engagement section, and a distal section having an inner diameter that is from about 0.034 mm to about 0.25 mm less than the inner diameter of the engagement section and the distal section having a length from about 1 mm to about 50 mm. The suction extension can comprise a connecting section with a lumen and with an average outer diameter greater by at least 0.025 mm than the inner diameter of the distal section of the tubular shaft, a tubular extension comprising a tube that is connected with the connecting section and extends from the connecting section in a distal direction, and a control structure comprising an elongated structure and extending from the connecting section in a proximal direction. The tubular extension can have a distal most inner diameter that is from about 20 percent to about 90 percent of the engagement section inner diameter, and the connecting section can be configured to slide within the central lumen of the engagement section to change the relative position of the connecting section within the central lumen and provide for at least a portion of the tubular extension to extend outward from the distal opening of the tubular shaft at appropriate configurations of the connecting section. Generally, a suction lumen is formed extending from the fitting configured to connect to the suction device through a portion of the central lumen, the connecting section and the tubular extension to a distal opening with the suction extension slidably positioned with the connecting section within the lumen of the engagement section of the tubular shaft with the tubular extension extending through and extending outward in a distal direction from the distal section of the tubular shaft.
A suction catheter system can include a guide catheter adapted with a suction extension having a narrower distal tube that can provide suction with a high flow rate. In some embodiments, the suction extension has a connecting section that has an asymmetric circumference interfacing with the inner surface of the guide catheter with contact at two locations to provide an effective fluid seal while providing for translation of the suction extension within the guide catheter. In alternative or additional embodiments, the guide catheter can have a distal portion of a tubular element that has a narrower diameter that effectively limits the movement of the suction extension in a distal direction. Suction catheters can be used advantageously for the removal of thrombus and emboli from bodily vessels, such as arteries. Some vessels can have a narrow diameter, and treatment locations can be downstream along a circuitous path, and for such vessels there are constraints on the catheter structures able to reach the treatment locations in the vessel.
The designs described herein comprise a slidable suction extension that can be adapted for use in conjunction with a corresponding guide catheter, which forms a significant portion of the overall suction lumen. While the suction catheter system can be used in any suitable vessels of the body, the system can be particularly desirable in cerebral blood vessels, such as for the treatment of acute stroke. The suction catheter system can be effectively used as a standalone suction catheter for thrombus removal. Furthermore, the suction catheter system can be effective as a component of a thrombectomy treatment system or other medical system to provide suction with the use of other medical devices, such as a clot engagement device, to disrupt thrombus and/or a filter structure that can catch emboli generated in the procedure as well as to be used to pull toward the suction catheter system. The treatment system can be effectively designed for stroke treatment.
Less invasive procedures, which are commonly referred to in the art as minimally invasive procedures, are desirable in the medical context when appropriate to reduce patient recovery times and in many cases to improve outcomes. In particular, less invasive procedures are commonly performed in the vasculature using catheter based system for reaching remote locations in a selected blood vessel for the performance of various treatment processes. These procedures can also be referred to as percutaneous procedures or transluminal procedures, in contrast with open surgical procedures, to emphasize the delivery through a vessel lumen. The discussion herein focuses on treatment of ischemic stroke since the devices can be particularly effective to treat these clinically important conditions, although the devices can be used in other procedures both in the vasculature and other bodily vessels. Patients include humans and can include other mammals, such as pet animals and farm animals. The terms proximal and distal are used in their conventional sense in the art, i.e., proximal refers to closer to the point of entry into the patient along the path in the vasculature or other vessel and distal refers to farther from the point of entry along the path in the vasculature.
A slidable suction extension generally comprises a connecting section that engages the inner wall of the guide catheter to make a suitably tight fit. The connecting section generally links a control structure, such as a control wire, extending in a proximal direction from the connecting section, and a tubular extension that extends from the control structure in a distal direction. The control structure generally extends outside of the patient to provide for positioning the suction extension with its distal tip near a treatment location in a blood vessel. The tubular extension, which may have an optional curved tip, can be tracked well over a guidewire to reach difficult to reach locations in a vessel.
For the treatment of strokes, treatment devices can be advanced through arteries to blood vessels of the brain. Blood vessels generally relevant for acute stroke treatment are downstream in the blood flow from the internal carotid arteries, and arteries generally branch and decrease in average diameter as the vessel proceeds in a downstream direction in the arterial vasculature. The body has a right internal carotid artery and a left internal carotid artery. For convenience, the blood vessels downstream from the internal carotid arteries are referred to herein as cerebral arteries. The cerebral arteries can be accessed with catheter based systems from, for example, a femoral artery in the groin, an artery in the arm, or the carotid artery in the neck using hemostatic procedures and appropriate fittings, such as those known in the art. The cerebral arteries are known to follow circuitous paths, and complications in tracking devices along the vessels also follows due to narrow diameters and branching of the vessels as well as potentially dangerous risks from damage to the blood vessel that can cause a hemorrhagic stroke condition. Nevertheless, it can be desirable to access tortuous narrow arteries for stroke treatment. The devices described herein are designed for advantageous use in these tortuous narrow cerebral vessels, but a person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize utility of these devices in other medical procedures.
The present suction catheter systems incorporate guide catheters adapted with a slidable suction extension suitable for cerebral procedures. In vascular procedures generally, a guide catheter can be used to facilitate the delivery of therapeutic devices while allowing for more rapid, accurate delivery with less risk to vessel walls through providing a protected channel leading most of the way to the treatment site. In the cerebral procedures, a guide catheter can be placed from exterior of the patient at the point of entry into the vasculature with the distal end of the guide catheter in a carotid artery or interior carotid artery. Thus, a guide catheter can provide a lumen to a location relatively near to a treatment site. In some embodiments, conventional guide catheters can be used to assemble the desired suction catheter systems, but in other embodiments, specific guide catheter designs are used to form the suction catheter system. The size of the guide catheter sets limits on the diameter of treatment structures delivered to the treatment site, but this is generally not a significant issue since extendable devices can be delivered in a lower profile configuration with subsequent deployments to an extended configuration and since the vessel sizes generally decrease in a distal direction from the guide catheter limiting the need for larger treatment devices. The suction devices described herein provide a suction extension that can protrude from the distal end of the guide catheter an adjustable amount through the positioning of a connecting section of the suction extension interfacing the suction extension with the interior walls of the lumen of the guide catheter. The connecting section can make a sufficiently tight seal with the guide catheter walls such that suction in the guide catheter lumen is transmitted along the lumen of the suction extension. Desirable degrees of suction can be obtained through the suction extension using suction applied at the proximal end of the guide catheter.
The suction extension generally comprises a connecting section, a control structure extending in a proximal direction from the connecting section, and a tubular extension extending in a distal direction from the connecting section. The suction extension generally interfaces with the guide catheter and can be designed to be positioned with its tip at a selected position distal to the guide catheter for the performance of a procedure at a selected location, such as near the location of thrombus occluding a cerebral vessel. Since the relative position of the treatment location and the distal end of the guide catheter generally vary for a specific medical situation, the degree in which the suction extension extends from the guide catheter can be adjusted through relative movement of the suction extension using the control structure, e.g. a control wire. The suction extension should move within the guide catheter lumen without the need for excessive force, which may be facilitated through the use of low friction polymers on one or both adjacent surfaces.
The connecting section of the suction extension provides for an interface with the inner wall of the guide catheter to prevent most or all flow around the connecting section that does not flow through the lumen of the suction extension while keeping at least a portion of the connecting section within the guide catheter and while providing for appropriately unproblematic sliding of the suction extension relative to the guide catheter within the patient's vasculature. Various embodiments of components forming such an interface are discussed in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/949,574 to Ogle et al. (hereinafter the '574 application), entitled “Catheter Systems for Applying Effective Suction in Remote Vessels and Thrombectomy Procedures Facilitated by Catheter Systems,” incorporated herein by reference. As described herein, a connecting section, referred to as a proximal portion in the '574 application, is described with a non-cylindrical cross sectional shape. Such a non-cylindrical cross sectional shape advantageously provides for contact with the guide catheter at two locations around the circumference along with a small clearance around the remaining section of the circumference of the connecting section. Contact with the inner lumen of the guide catheter applies some force on the connecting section that partially rounds out the circumference. This non-cylindrical shape for the connecting section allows for effective blockage of flow between the guide catheter wall and the connecting section while not inhibiting movement of the connecting section longitudinally to position the tip of the suction extension within the vasculature.
The non-circular cross sectional shape of the connecting section of the suction extension can generally be described as oval. The oval can be characterized at least in part by a major axis along the longer dimension of the oval and a minor axis along the shorter dimension of the oval orthogonal to the longer dimension. The connecting section can then contact or approach very closely to the inner surface of the engagement section of the guide catheter at two locations associated with the points along the circumference associated with the major axis. Correspondingly, the non-circular cross section can be characterized by an average radius, and the average radius can provide an overall very small clearance with the guide catheter while still providing for desirable function.
To form the non-circular cross section, a bump can be formed through the connection of a control wire along a surface of the connecting section along with extra polymer that provides for the desired shape along with reinforcing the control wire connection with the connecting section. Additional embodiments of the connecting section structure with an oval cross section are described below. Thus, the non-circular shape of the connecting section cross section can be designed for its interface with the guide catheter consistently with the overall structure of the suction extension.
Also, since it is desirable to prevent the connecting section of the suction extension from exiting from the distal end of the guide catheter, the suction extension and/or catheter can be designed to limit the distal movement of the suction extension. In an embodiment described herein, a specific guide catheter construction can be used to retain the connecting section or a portion thereof of the suction extension within the guide catheter lumen. Specifically, the tubular portion of the guide catheter can have a tubular segment at the distal end of the guide catheter having a slightly smaller inner diameter. Since the clearance can be made small between the connecting section and the guide catheter, a modest step down of the guide catheter diameter can limit the further distal movement of the suction extension. The construction of the guide catheter with the smaller diameter distal tubular element can be incorporated into the catheter assembly process to provide a stable construction.
In comparison with a suction catheter delivered through the guide catheter in which the suction flow is confined to the suction catheter, a significant length of the suction catheter is replaced with a control element in the suction catheter systems herein. This replacement of a significant length of a suction catheter with a control element results in a device that can have less friction when the tip of the suction catheter is advanced in the patient's vasculature since a control wire or other control element can offers less resistance for its movement. The tip of the suction extension can be given a curved tip to facilitate tracking of the device over a guidewire. With the designs described herein, a suction extension for aspiration with a curved tip for tracking the tip over a guidewire can be effectively guided too difficult to reach locations with the use of a control wire or other control element moving the slide portion at or near the distal end of the suction extension, and the design provides for good suction ability without sacrificing the ability to reach difficult to reach vessels, such as within cerebral vessels. While the suction extension is moved, the guide catheter portion of the suction lumen can remain in place
When suction is applied at or near the proximal end of the guide catheter with a suitable negative pressure device, fluid is sucked into a distal opening at the end of the suction extension. It has been found that strong suction can be transmitted through to the suction extension. A suction lumen extends from a negative pressure device, generally attached at a fitting associated with a proximal section, at or near the proximal end of the suction system through the guide catheter lumen to the suction extension and through the connecting section of the suction extension and the tubular extension of the suction extension to a distal opening. Suitable negative pressure devices include, for example, syringes, pumps or the like. The guide catheter can provide a large lumen as a significant section of the overall suction lumen. The effective suction lumen then can appear to have a large proximal section contributed by the guide catheter and a tapered distal section contributed by the suction extension, which can have one or more tapered segments.
The tubular extension of the suction extension has a lumen with a reduced diameter relative to the guide catheter lumen and good flexibility to provide for placement of its distal end into smaller vessels. The lumen of the tubular extension though is maintained at a sufficiently large diameter that provides for delivery of additional therapeutic devices through the lumen to the treatment location. The outer diameter at the tip of the suction extension generally is (diameter in mm=(Fr value)/3, Fr represents the French catheter scale) at least about 1.5Fr less than the outer diameter of the distal section of the guide catheter. The smaller diameter of the tubular extension can provide access to desirable vessels, such as cerebral vessels.
It was previously discovered that good suction properties could be obtained with a suction catheter with a stepped down diameter in a distal section. Thus, for example, the majority of the length of the suction catheter can be 6Fr outer diameter while a distal section may be 5Fr outer diameter, which roughly corresponding decreases in the inner diameters. Such a catheter can provide access into vessels suitable for a 5Fr catheter, but can provide significantly better suction than a suction catheter with a 5Fr catheter body along its entire length. Commercial stepped down suction catheters, such as Mi-Axus™ catheters (MIVI Neurosciences, Inc.) and ACE™ 64 catheters (Penumbra, Inc.) are finding good clinical results. The step down suction catheters and their use for thrombectomy procedures in cerebral arteries are described in the '792 patent cited above. While these catheters achieve better suction than catheters with constant diameters corresponding with the distal diameters, the present suction catheter systems with a sliding suction extension are found to provide better suction suggesting that the diameter over the majority of the suction lumen length contributes to a large extent to the suction provided at the distal opening of the suction lumen.
An initial part of a procedure using the devices described herein generally involves accessing the treatment location within the vasculature. Guidewires have been designed to facilitate access to difficult to reach locations. The term guidewire is used herein to refer broadly to wire structures that may or may not have internal structure are referred to as guidewires whether or not they are formed from a solid or woven metal, such as corewire-overtube integrated structures, coils or the like which may not have a closed inner lumen over at least a portion of the devices length.
In particular, with the devices described herein procedures can be performed to provide re-profusion in vessels that are blocked completely or partially with clots. Clots in cerebral arteries can cause strokes with corresponding serious consequences, and time generally is of the essence of treating these conditions. The suction extension with the guide catheter can be used to provide aspiration that can be useful to remove clots or fragments thereof. Thus, the suction extension combined with the guide catheter and negative pressure device can be used as stand-alone devices for thrombectomy procedures. However, the suction extension with aspiration can be effectively used as part of a treatment system comprising, for example, also a fiber based filter and/or other components to facilitate removal of a clot or portions thereof. The delivery catheter with the expandable tip is designed to facilitate access, so it is useful as a tool for the practice of various other procedures.
In some embodiments of the procedure, a guidewire can be placed at or near an occlusion and a guide catheter with a positionable suction extension can be placed in the vasculature upstream from the occlusion with the guidewire extending through the interior of the suction extension. If the suction catheter system is to be used alone, then the suction extension can be advanced using a control wire over the guidewire to a suitable position near the clot. Then, with or without removing the guidewire, suction can be initiated to suck the clot or a portion thereof into the distal opening or against the tip of the suction extension. Suction may or may not be continued as the suction extension and/or guide catheter are removed from the patient.
While suction with the suction extension can be effective as the only device for clot removal, additional treatment systems can combine other devices for use with the suction catheter system. In particular, a filter device can be used to provide both embolic protection as well as a tool to facilitate removal of the clot or portions thereof, which may involve direct engagement of the clot with the filter device. Fiber based filters/embolic protection systems have been developed that can be effectively used in the narrow vessels of interest. In particular, fiber-based filter systems with an appropriate actuation system can be used for delivery in a low profile configuration past an occlusion and deployed to provide protection from any clot fragments that may be released during the removal process.
The devices described herein provide improved functionality for performing procedures for the removal of clots from vessels. As noted herein, the devices can be used in various combinations within medical systems for percutaneous procedures.
Suction System with Sliding Suction Extension
Suction Systems are described that take advantage of good suction available with a suction catheter lumen having a larger proximal suction and a narrower diameter suction extension that uses the guide catheter lumen as a proximal suction lumen. A laterally slidable suction extension extends from a proximal section located within the guide lumen, and the suction extension can have a smaller diameter to provide access to narrow vessels while providing for delivery of other treatment structures and/or embolic protection structures as well as for a desirable level of suction for the removal of debris from the vessel. A control wire or other control structure can be attached to the suction extension to control sliding for providing selective lateral placement of the suction extension relative to a fixed guide catheter and a target treatment location. In some embodiments, the suction extension comprises a connecting section that interfaces with the guide catheter lumen with a non-cylindrical cross section to provide for contact at two parts along the circumference. This non-cylindrical interface can block flow between the exterior of the proximal portion of the suction extension and proximal locations in the interior of the guide catheter while allowing relatively easy sliding of the suction extension relative to the guide catheter. A specific guide catheter design can incorporate various tubular elements along its shaft to provide for desired flexibility and a narrower diameter distal tubular element can be used to retain the proximal section of the suction extension within the guide catheter lumen.
Referring to
In general, tubular shaft 108 can have an approximately constant diameter along its length, or some guide catheters can have sections with different diameters, generally with a smaller diameter section distal to a larger diameter section. In some embodiments described herein, a significant of the length of the tubular shaft has a constant diameter to make desired contact with a connecting section of the suction extension, which can be called an engagement section of the tubular shaft designed to engage the suction extension in a configuration suitable for the delivery of suction to a patient. Portions of the tubular shaft proximal to the engagement section can have a larger inner diameter and generally larger outer diameter relative to the engagement section. While a conventional guide catheter can be used in some embodiments for the suction catheter system, a specific design is described in detail below. A distal tubular portion of the tubular shaft can have a slightly narrower inner diameter to retain a portion of suction extension 104 within tubular shaft 108. Tubular shaft 108 can have one or more radiopaque marker bands to facilitate positioning of the tubular shaft within the patient as well as positioning the connecting section of the suction extension within the guide catheter lumen, and
Suction extension 104 generally comprises a connecting section 140, tubular extension 142, and control structure 148, such as a control wire. All or a part of connecting section 140 can be configured to remain within the lumen of guide catheter 102. As shown in
As noted above, the connecting section of suction extension engages the inner lumen of the guide catheter with an appropriate interface to reduce or eliminate flow of blood between the connecting section of the suction extension while allowing for the user to translate the suction extension relative to the guide catheter to position the tip of the tubular extension. A desirable design with a connecting section of the suction extension having a non-circular cross section has been found to particularly meet these criteria. With material selection as described herein, a very small average clearance can also be used between the connecting section of the suction extension and the interior of the guide catheter. When assembled, the inner lumen of the guide catheter can contact the connecting section of the suction extension at two locations around the circumference, which can provide partial rounding the cross section of the connecting section. This two location contact configuration provides desirable confinement of the flow while allowing for sliding of the suction extension by the user with appropriate ease.
The non-circular cross section of the connecting section (or a portion thereof) of the suction extension generally can be roughly oval in shape. While not intending to be limited by this term, in some embodiments, the cross section can have one axis of symmetry resembling the cross section of a conventional egg. As described below, the oval shape can be generated through the attachment of a wire control structure to the proximal section, although other structural features can be used to introduce the oval shape, such as with approximately one axis of symmetry or two axes of symmetry, although the oval can be asymmetric. Generally, the oval cross section can be partially characterized by a major axis, e.g., the longer dimension along an axis of symmetry, and a minor axis, e.g., the longest line segment connecting the circumference perpendicular to the major axis. While the specification of the major axis and the minor axis does not fully specify the oval since the specific shape is not specified, the major and minor axes can provide significant information regarding the dimensions and relative shape of the oval, especially since the shapes are generally not far out of a circular shape. Also, an average clearance can be defined using the largest value of the circumference (C) of the oval cross section and converting to an equivalent circle to define an approximate average diameter (Da=C/π).
An embodiment of a guide catheter is shown in
A sectional view of a portion of shaft 164 near the proximal end is shown in
A lubricious coating, for example, a hydrophilic coating, can be placed on the outer surface of shaft 164 or a portion thereof. Suitable hydrophilic coatings include, for example, polyvinyl alcohol, heparin based coatings, or the like. Hydrohylic coating solutions are commercially available, such as LUBRICENT® (Harland Medical Systems, MN, USA) or SERENE™ (Surmodics, Inc, MN, USA). Further description of the materials and manufacturing process are provided below.
The guide catheter can have an outer diameter (D) from about 5.5 Fr (1.667 mm diameter) to about 10 Fr (3.333 mm diameter), in further embodiments from about 6 Fr (1.833 mm diameter) to about 9 Fr (3 mm diameter), and in some embodiments from about 6.25 Fr (2 mm diameter) to about 8.5Fr (2.833 mm diameter). The guide catheter measurement are generally referenced to the outer diameter, and the inner diameter is less than the outer diameter by twice the wall thickness. In general, the inner diameter of the main portion of shaft 164 (d1) can range from about 0.8 mm to about 3.175 mm, in further embodiments from about 0.9 mm to about 2.85 mm and in additional embodiments from about 1.00 mm to about 2.7 mm. The reduction in inner diameter of distal section 188 (d2) relative to the inner diameter of an engagement section of shaft 164 (d1) can be from about 0.034 mm (0.00134 in) to about 0.25 mm (0.0098 in) and in further embodiments from about 0.05 mm (0.002 in) to about 0.20 mm (0.0079 in). The length of the guide catheter shaft can be from about 30 cm to about 150 cm, in further embodiments from about 35 cm to about 130 cm and in additional embodiments from about 40 cm to about 120 cm, and is generally selected to be suitable for the corresponding procedure. In some embodiments, distal section 188 can have a length (Ld) from about 1 mm to about 50 mm, in further embodiments from about 1.5 mm to about 25 mm, and in other embodiments from about 2 mm to about 20 mm. A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional ranges of dimensions within the explicit ranges above are contemplated and are within the present disclosure.
For use of the guide catheter of
An embodiment of a suction extension is shown in
Connecting section 234 generally is distinguishable by a larger outer diameter than tubular extension 236, and tubular extension 236 extends from the connecting section 234 in a distal direction. In the embodiment of
The relationship of connecting section 234 with control wire 232 and tubular extension 236 are shown in
The interface of control wire 232 with connecting section 234 can serve the purpose of both securing the components together as well as helping to form the shape of connecting section 234, which can be selected to provide a desired interface with the interior of the guide catheter lumen. Specifically, the connection of the control wire with the connecting section can facilitate the formation of the oval cross section of the connecting section. In alternative embodiments, control wire 232 can terminate with a flat wire coil that is embedded into a polymer tube to substantially maintain the shape of the connecting section, as described in the '574 application and below. In additional or alternative embodiments, an oval shape of the connecting section can be introduced through the molding or other shaping of the polymer which may or may not be combined with a bump due to an embedded control wire. Suitable dimensions of the oval cross section and the processing to form the connecting section are described further below. Low friction liner 248 can extend through the inner lumen of connecting section 234, as shown in
Referring to
An alternative embodiment of a suction extension is shown in
Referring to
As shown in
A significant aspect of the suction extension is the narrower diameter suction tip relative to the guide catheter, and the step down diameter of the second tubular section of the embodiment of
To further provide for suction strength, the tubular extension itself can have different sections with stepped down diameters, such as shown in the embodiment of
The tubular extension or distal tubular section of the tubular extension for embodiments with a plurality of tubular sections with different inner diameters can have an inner diameter from about 20 percent to about 90 percent of the inner diameter of the engagement section of the guide catheter, and in further embodiments from about 30 percent to about 85 percent and in additional embodiments from about 35 percent to about 80 percent of the inner diameter of the engagement section of the tubular shaft. For example, the distal tip of the tubular extension can have an inner diameter in a range from about 0.5 mm to about 1.9 mm, in further embodiments from about 0.6 mm to about 1.8 mm, and in other embodiments from about 0.65 mm to about 1.75 mm. The tubular extension can have a length from about 3 cm to about 60 cm, in some embodiments from about 5 cm to about 55 cm and in further embodiments from about 8 cm to about 50 cm. A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional ranges of dimensions within the explicit ranges above are contemplated and are within the present disclosure.
The distal tip of the tubular extension can be bent or curved in its natural unstressed configuration. It has been found generally that a bent tip catheter can facilitate tracking of the catheter over a guidewire without adversely altering the suction abilities. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 8,021,351 to Boldenow et al., entitled “Tracking Aspiration Catheter,” incorporated herein by reference. Two general versions of a bent suction tip are shown in
A specific embodiment of a bent tip for a suction extension 380 is shown in
In this embodiment, the curvature of the tip is gradual so that the distal tip may not have a straight section. An angle γ can be defined based on the point of initial curvature and the natural position of the tip taken at the middle of the distal opening. In some embodiments, angle γ can be from about 5 degrees to about 21 degrees and in further embodiment from about 7 degrees to about 20 degrees. To achieve the gentle curvature, the radius of curvature generally is relatively large, and in some embodiments, the radius of curvature can be from about 21 mm to about 100 mm and in further embodiments from about 25 mm to about 75 mm. In some embodiments, a straight portion of the tip after the curve can have a length no more than about 1 cm, and in other embodiments from about 0.1 mm to about 6 mm and in further embodiments from about 0.5 mm to about 4 mm. In alternative embodiments, the curve consists of a gradual arc with no significant straight section distal to it, such that the curve or bend is specified by the angle and radius of curvature. A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional ranges of angles, radii and lengths within the explicit ranges above are contemplated and are within the present disclosure.
As noted above, the connecting section of the suction extension can have a non-circular, oval cross section, which can interface then with the inner surface in the lumen of the guide catheter to contact the inner surface at two locations along the circumference. The interface between the connecting section of the suction extension and the engagement section of the guide catheter reduces or eliminates any flow between surfaces so that essentially all of the suction flow passes through the lumen of the suction extension. At the same time, the suction extension can be positioned longitudinally within the engagement section to position the suction extension by a user through sliding the control structure. These various conditions can be balanced effectively to provide the desired functionality.
Referring to
As noted above, the non-cylindrical connecting section can be characterized with the major axis, minor axis and an average diameter obtained from the circumference. Based on these parameters, it is possible to specify significant aspects of the interface between connecting section 400 and engagement portion 402 with a difference between the major axis and the minor axis, with a difference between the major axis of an unconstrained connecting section 400 and the inner diameter of engagement section 402, and with the difference between the inner diameter of engagement section 402 and the average diameter of connecting section 400. For example, the difference between the major axis and the minor axis can be from about 30 microns to about 160 microns and in further embodiments from about 50 microns to about 140 microns. In some embodiments, the tolerance measured as a difference between the diameter of the inner surface of engagement section 402 and the average diameter of the connecting section can be, for example, no more than about 4 thou (1 thou= 1/1000 of an inch; 4 thou ˜102.6 microns), in further embodiments no more than about 3 thou (76.2 microns), in additional embodiments no more than about 1.75 thou (45 microns), in other embodiments from about 1 thou (25.4 microns) to about 1.75 thou (45 microns) and can be approximately zero within the measurement uncertainty. For embodiments in which the major axis of the connecting section separated from the guide catheter is larger than the guide catheter inner diameter, the difference between the major axis of unconstrained (i.e., separated from the guide catheter) connecting section 400 and the inner diameter of engagement section 402 can be from about 0 to about 250 microns, in further embodiments from about 15 microns to about 150 microns and in other embodiments from about 20 microns to about 100 microns. A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional ranges of dimensions differences within the explicit ranges above are contemplated and are within the present disclosure.
Catheter components can be formed from one or more biocompatible materials, including, for example, metals, such as stainless steel or alloys, e.g., Nitinol®, or polymers such as polyether-amide block co-polymer (PEBAX®), nylon (polyamides), polyolefins, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyesters, polyurethanes, polycarbonates, polysiloxanes (silicones), polycarbonate urethanes (e.g., ChronoFlex AR®), mixtures thereof, combinations thereof, or other suitable biocompatible polymers. Radio-opacity can be achieved with the addition of metal markers, such as platinum-iridium alloy, tantalum, tungsten, gold, platinum-tungsten alloy or mixtures thereof, such as wire or bands, or through radio-pacifiers, such as barium sulfate, bismuth trioxide, bismuth subcarbonate, powdered tungsten, powdered tantalum or the like, added to the polymer resin. Medical grade PEBAX is available commercially loaded with barium sulfate, as well as with ranges of Shore hardness values. Generally, different sections of aspiration catheter can be formed from different materials from other sections, and sections of aspiration catheter can comprise a plurality of materials at different locations and/or at a particular location. In addition, selected sections of the catheter can be formed with materials to introduce desired stiffness/flexibility for the particular section of the catheter. Similarly, fitting can be formed form a suitable material, such as one or more metals and/or one or more polymers.
In some embodiments, the guide catheter, suction extension or appropriate portions thereof comprises a thermoplastic polymer, such as the polymers listed above, with embedded metal elements, which reinforces the polymer. The wire can be braided, coiled or otherwise placed over a polymer tubing liner with some tension to keep the wire in place over the tubing liner. In some embodiments, a polymer jacket, such as a heat shrink polymer, can then be placed over the top and heated to shrink and fuse the cover over the structure, and/or the polymer tube can be softened with heat to allow incorporation of the metal reinforcements. Upon heating to a temperature over the softening temperature and/or heat shrink temperature of the polymer and subsequent cooling, the reinforcing metal becomes embedded within the polymer. In appropriate embodiments, a liner and a jacket can be the same or different materials. Suitable wire includes, for example, flat stainless steel wire or the like. Wire diameters can range from about 0.00025 inch (0.00635 mm) to about 0.004 inch (0.1 mm) and in further embodiments from about 0.0005 inch (0.013 mm) to about 0.003 inch (0.075 mm). For appropriate embodiments, braid picks per inch can be from about 20 to about 250 picks per inch and in further embodiments from about 50 to about 150 picks per inch. For appropriate embodiments, coils can be single or multiple filament coils having, for example, pitches from about 0.005 inch (0.13 mm) to about 0.1 inch (2.54 mm) and in further embodiments form about 0.01 inch (0.26 mm) to about 0.050 inch (1.27 mm). A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional ranges within the explicit ranges below are conceived and are within the present disclosure. The wire adds additional mechanical strength while maintaining appropriate amounts of flexibility. The wire can provide some radio-opacity although radiopaque bands generally would provide a darker and distinguishable image relative to the wire. However, the image of the wire can provide further visualization of the catheter during the procedure.
To decrease the chance of accidental removal of the radiopaque band from the catheter and to decrease the chance of the radiopaque band catching onto other objects within the vessel, a metal reinforcing wire can be used to cover or enclose the radiopaque band with the metal wire subsequently being embedded within the polymer. In some embodiments, a polymer jacket can be placed over the metal wire, which is correspondingly covering the radiopaque band(s), and the heat bonding embeds the radiopaque marked band also. If desired, placement of the marker band under metal wire can prevent the band from being separated from the catheter in the event that the wall is kinked or collapsed. If collapse or kinking of the catheter wall occurs, the braid-wire over the surface of the band collapses down over the marker band to prevent it from separating from the structure.
Referring to
Treatment Systems
The suction system described herein can be used effectively to remove blood clots from the vasculature, including the vasculature of the brain to treat acute stroke conditions. In particular, the narrow tip catheter of the '792 patent have performed well in human clinical trials to restore blood flow in persons with an acute embolic stroke with good patient outcomes. The device described herein may be expected to provide even better suction while maintaining access capability into vessels challenging to navigate. Nevertheless, for some acute stoke conditions or other embolic events, it can be desirable to use the suction catheter systems described herein with other medical tools for performing the therapy.
Referring to
Embolic protection devices with small filter longitudinal extent and designed for suitable manipulations to facilitate delivery in vessels have been developed that are suitable for use in the medical systems described herein. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,879,062B2 to Galdonik et al., entitled “Fiber Based Embolic Protection Device,” and U.S. Pat. No. 8,092,483B2 to Galdonik et al., entitled “Steerable Device Having a Corewire Within a Tube and Combination with a Medical Device,” both of which are incorporated herein by reference. FiberNet® embolic protection devices based on the technology in these patents are commercially available from Medtronic Inc. Additional fiber-based filter devices particularly designed for delivery into tortuous vessels are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,814,892B2 to Galdonik et al. (hereinafter the '892 patent), entitled “Embolectomy Devices and Method of Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Condition,” incorporated herein by reference. The '892 patent describes the use of the filter device as a clot engagement tool for use with an aspiration catheter. The '892 patent also envisions the use of supplementary structures to facilitate engagement of the clot. The use of supplementary structures are also contemplated in procedures described herein.
Microcatheters have been designed to allow for access to small blood vessels, such as cerebral blood vessels, and cerebral microcatheters are available commercially, e.g. Prowler Select™ (Cordis Neurovascular Inc.) and Spinnaker Elite™ (Boston Scientific Co.). Of course the term microcatheter can cover a range of devices, and the present discussion can focus on catheters useful for the procedures described herein. In some embodiments, microcatheters can comprise a distal section that is narrower than a proximal section. However, in further embodiments, a microcatheter can have an approximately constant diameter along its length to facilitate delivery of other devices over the microcatheter. A narrow distal diameter allows for the catheter to navigate the tortuous vessels of the brain. The distal section can be highly flexible enough to navigate the vessels, but resilient enough to resist kinking. A microcatheter comprises at least one lumen. The microcatheter can then be used to deliver other treatment devices, aspiration, therapeutic agents, or other means of treating a condition. While microcatheters can have a selected size, in some embodiments, the microcatheters can have a distal outer diameter from about 1.0Fr to about 3.5Fr and in further embodiments from about 1.5Fr to about 3Fr, and a length from about 30 cm to about 200 cm and in further embodiments from about 45 cm to about 150 cm. A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional size ranges within the explicit ranges above are contemplated and are within the present disclosure.
With respect to percutaneous medical devices 762, suitable devices include, for example, clot engagement devices, angioplasty balloons, stent delivery devices, atherectomy devices, such as stent retrievers, and the like. Desirable thrombus engagement devices are described in published U.S. patent application 2017/0056061 to Ogle et al., entitled “Thrombectomy Devices and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke With Thrombus Engagement,” incorporated herein by reference. Stents may be, for example, balloon extendable, self-extendable or extendable using any other reasonable mechanism. Also, balloon extendable stents can be crimped to the balloon for delivery to engage a clot in a blood vessel. Some balloon-stent structures are described further, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,106,530, entitled “Stent Delivery Device;” U.S. Pat. No. 6,364,894, entitled “Method of Making an Angioplasty Balloon Catheter;” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,156,005, entitled “Balloon [sic] Catheter For Stent Implantation,” each of which are incorporated herein by reference. Self-expanding stents are described further in U.S. Pat. No. 8,764,813 to Jantzen et al., entitled “Gradually Self-Expanding Stent” and U.S. Pat. No. 8,419,786 to Cottone, Jr. et al., entitled “Self-Expanding Stent,” both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Stent retrievers are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 8,795,305 to Martin et al., entitled “Retrieval systems and methods of use thereof,” incorporated herein by reference.
Procedures Making Use of Treatment Systems
As indicated above, the medical systems comprising a suction catheter system described herein can be used with the suction catheter system as stand-alone treatment device, perhaps with a guidewire and/or other delivery support devices, or used with supplemental medical treatment devices for treatment of ischemic vessel blockage. In particular, in some embodiments, the suction system is used with an embolic protection device, and in additional embodiments, some form of clot engagement device, stent, balloon, atherectomy device or the like may also be used. In any case, a guidewire is generally used to provide access to the treatment site. The guide catheter portion of the suction catheter system may or may not be positioned prior to the introduction of the suction extension. The structures of the particular components are described in detail above, and are not repeated so that this section can focus on the use of the devices.
For the treatment of an acute ischemic stroke condition, referring to
Referring to
The further use of an additional medical device to facilitate clot removal is shown in
The suction catheter system is generally appropriately sterilized, such as with e-beam or gas sterilization. The suction catheter system components can be packaged together or separately in a sealed package, such as plastic packages known in the art. The package will be appropriately labeled, generally according to FDA or other regulatory agency regulations. The suction catheter system can be packaged with other components, such as a guidewire, filter device, and/or other medical device. The packaged system generally is sold with detailed instructions for use according to regulatory requirements.
Bench testing and calculations were performed to evaluate the general suction performance of the use of a suction extension interfaced with a guide catheter and for other commercial suction catheters. These results are described in the copending '574 application, and are incorporated herein by reference.
The embodiments above are intended to be illustrative and not limiting. Additional embodiments are within the claims. In addition, although the present invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Any incorporation by reference of documents above is limited such that no subject matter is incorporated that is contrary to the explicit disclosure herein. To the extent that specific structures, compositions and/or processes are described herein with components, elements, ingredients or other partitions, it is to be understand that the disclosure herein covers the specific embodiments, embodiments comprising the specific components, elements, ingredients, other partitions or combinations thereof as well as embodiments consisting essentially of such specific components, ingredients or other partitions or combinations thereof that can include additional features that do not change the fundamental nature of the subject matter, as suggested in the discussion, unless otherwise specifically indicated.
This application is a continuation of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/604,058 filed on May 24, 2017 to Ogle, entitled “Suction Catheter Systems for Applying Effective Aspiration in Remote Vessels, Especially Cerebral Arteries,” incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2730101 | Hoffman | Jan 1956 | A |
3949757 | Sabel | Apr 1976 | A |
3996938 | Clark, III | Dec 1976 | A |
4020829 | Wilson et al. | May 1977 | A |
4033331 | Guss et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4174715 | Hasson | Nov 1979 | A |
4610662 | Weikl et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4619263 | Frisbie et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4676249 | Arenas et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4723549 | Wholey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4728319 | Masch | Mar 1988 | A |
4739768 | Engleson | Apr 1988 | A |
4784636 | Rydell | Nov 1988 | A |
4790812 | Hawkins, Jr. et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4794928 | Kletchka | Jan 1989 | A |
4795434 | Kujawski | Jan 1989 | A |
4799496 | Hargreaves et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4834709 | Banning et al. | May 1989 | A |
4863431 | Vaillancourt | Sep 1989 | A |
4873978 | Ginsburg | Oct 1989 | A |
4873979 | Ginsburg | Oct 1989 | A |
4883460 | Zanetti | Nov 1989 | A |
4887613 | Farr et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4900303 | Lemelson | Feb 1990 | A |
4921484 | Hillstead | May 1990 | A |
4994067 | Summers | Feb 1991 | A |
4998919 | Schnepp-Pesch et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5011488 | Ginsburg | Apr 1991 | A |
5011490 | Fischell et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5053008 | Bajaj | Oct 1991 | A |
5059178 | Ya | Oct 1991 | A |
5102415 | Guenther et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108419 | Reger et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5152277 | Honda et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5161534 | Berthaume | Nov 1992 | A |
5163906 | Ahmadi | Nov 1992 | A |
5185004 | Lashinski | Feb 1993 | A |
5188621 | Samson | Feb 1993 | A |
5200248 | Thompson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5211651 | Reger et al. | May 1993 | A |
5219332 | Nelson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5308318 | Plassche, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5312338 | Nelson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5325868 | Kimmelstiel | Jul 1994 | A |
5334160 | Ellis | Aug 1994 | A |
5352197 | Hammersmark et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364358 | Hweitt et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5392778 | Horzewski | Feb 1995 | A |
5395383 | Adams et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5413575 | Haenggi | May 1995 | A |
5423331 | Wysham | Jun 1995 | A |
5438993 | Lynch et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465716 | Avitall | Nov 1995 | A |
5485667 | Kleshinski | Jan 1996 | A |
5490859 | Mische et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5501694 | Resseman et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5527292 | Adams et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533967 | Imran | Jul 1996 | A |
5546958 | Thorud et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549626 | Miller et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5571122 | Kelly et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578009 | Kraus et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5599307 | Bacher et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5720764 | Naderlinger | Feb 1998 | A |
5766191 | Trerotola | Jun 1998 | A |
5776142 | Gunderson | Jul 1998 | A |
5810874 | Lefebvre | Sep 1998 | A |
5814064 | Daniel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817101 | Fiedler | Oct 1998 | A |
5836868 | Resseman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843002 | Pecor et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843051 | Adams et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851189 | Forber | Dec 1998 | A |
5882329 | Patterson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897567 | Resseman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899890 | Chiang et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910154 | Tsugita et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911725 | Boury | Jun 1999 | A |
5911734 | Tsugita et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5928260 | Chin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935139 | Bates | Aug 1999 | A |
5938645 | Gordon | Aug 1999 | A |
5941869 | Patterson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5972019 | Engleson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997557 | Barbut et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010522 | Barbut et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6022336 | Zando-Azizi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030349 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030369 | Engleson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6066149 | Samson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6106530 | Harada | Aug 2000 | A |
6117141 | Ouchi | Sep 2000 | A |
6135991 | Muni et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142987 | Tsugita | Nov 2000 | A |
6146396 | Konya et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156005 | Theron | Dec 2000 | A |
6159195 | Ha et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159230 | Samuels | Dec 2000 | A |
6168579 | Tsugita | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203561 | Ramee et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206868 | Parodi | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221049 | Selmon et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238402 | Sullivan, III et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238412 | Dubrul et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240231 | Ferrera et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6258115 | Dubrul | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270477 | Bagaoisan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277139 | Levinson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6306163 | Fitz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6346116 | Brooks et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361545 | Macoviak et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364894 | Healy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368338 | Konya et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391044 | Yadav et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6454741 | Muni et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454775 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6485466 | Hamilton | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485500 | Kokish et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485501 | Green | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6511470 | Hamilton | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511471 | Rosenman et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514261 | Randall et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6514273 | Voss et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537295 | Petersen | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540768 | Diaz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551302 | Rosinko et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558405 | McInnes | May 2003 | B1 |
6569148 | Bagaoisan et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6579484 | Tiernan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589262 | Honebrink et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6596011 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610077 | Hancock et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616681 | Hanson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6620148 | Tsugita | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6695858 | Dubrul et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695865 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702834 | Boylan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6773448 | Kusleika et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6805684 | Bonnette et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6805692 | Muni et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6824553 | Samson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6866669 | Buzzard et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878151 | Carrison et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879854 | Windheuser et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6911036 | Douk et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6945956 | Waldhauser et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949104 | Griffis et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951570 | Linder et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958059 | Zando-Azizi | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969395 | Eskuri | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6991642 | Petersen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7052500 | Bashiri et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056328 | Arnott | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7115134 | Chambers | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115138 | Renati et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7166120 | Kusleika | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7220271 | Clubb et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7229431 | Houser et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229463 | Sutton et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229464 | Hanson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7232452 | Adams et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7285126 | Sepekta et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7309334 | von Hoffmann | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7374564 | Brown | May 2008 | B2 |
7329278 | Seguin et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7449010 | Hayase et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7476232 | Deal | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7549974 | Nayak | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7625207 | Hershey et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7736355 | Itou et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7842055 | Pintor et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7879062 | Galdonik et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7938820 | Webster et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8021351 | Boldenow et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8048032 | Root et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092483 | Galdonik et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8231600 | von Hoffmann | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8308712 | Provst et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8419786 | Cottone, Jr. et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8465456 | Stivland | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8764813 | Jantzen et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795305 | Martin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814892 | Galdonik et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8932286 | Terry et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9199057 | Nielsen | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9433427 | Look et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9561345 | Garrison et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9993613 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10213582 | Garrison et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10463386 | Ogle et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10478535 | Ogle | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10518066 | Pokorney et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10716915 | Ogle | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20010031980 | Wensel et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044600 | Elkins | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044632 | Daniel et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051811 | Bonnette et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020035347 | Bagoisan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020055747 | Cano et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062133 | Gilson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020095174 | Tsugita et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111648 | Kusleika et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123765 | Sepekta et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133111 | Shadduck | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143362 | Mackoviak et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151927 | Douk et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165574 | Ressemann | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169472 | Douk et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183782 | Tsugita et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023263 | Krolik et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030065353 | Horzewski et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120208 | Houser et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135232 | Douk et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030191492 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040006344 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006365 | Brady et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015151 | Chambers | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040153118 | Clubb et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040220611 | Ogle | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254602 | Lehe | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004553 | Douk | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021075 | Bonnette et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021152 | Ogle et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050075661 | Levine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085847 | Galdonik et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107738 | Slater et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050154344 | Chang | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050209631 | Galdonik et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228479 | Pavcnik et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245894 | Zando-Azizi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277976 | Galdonik et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030876 | Peacock, III | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047301 | Ogle | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060129091 | Bonnette et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060195137 | Septka et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200047 | Galdonik et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200191 | Zando-Azizi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070005002 | Millman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070060908 | Webster et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060911 | Webster et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060944 | Boldenow et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070135733 | Soukup et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135832 | Wholey | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070185501 | Martin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197956 | Le et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070227543 | Peichel | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250040 | Provost et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250096 | Yamane et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260115 | Brock et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287956 | Tal | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080086110 | Galdonik et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109088 | Galdonik et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080172066 | Galdonik et al. | Jul 2008 | A9 |
20090076319 | Muyari | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090131970 | Chanduszko et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100204672 | Lockhart et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211050 | Luther | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100028045 | Teeslink et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110093000 | Ogle et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110172678 | Behl et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120123466 | Porter et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120253313 | Galdonik et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130184742 | Ganesan et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130225937 | Schaffer et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130317409 | Cully et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140018773 | Wang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140114335 | Banko | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140117397 | Saeki et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140155980 | Turjman et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140249508 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276537 | Kruse | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150018937 | Lagodzki et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150173782 | Garrison et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150209066 | Dahm et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150216650 | Shaltis | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150282821 | Look | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150327919 | Clopp et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160066931 | Kugler et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160166754 | Kassab et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160199620 | Pokorney et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160220741 | Garrison et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160270806 | Wallace | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170056032 | Look et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170056061 | Ogle et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170143938 | Ogle et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170181760 | Look et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170203036 | Mazlish et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170231647 | Saunders et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170239447 | Yang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170252051 | Wan et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170252057 | Bonnett et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170290600 | Ulm, III | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170303942 | Greenhalgh et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170303948 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170333060 | Panian | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333237 | Walzman | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170354427 | Bonnett et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180008295 | Ulm, III | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180064453 | Garrison et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180161541 | Haldis et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180339130 | Ogle | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190117891 | Carothers et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190183517 | Ogle et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
204158457 | Feb 2015 | CN |
10475829 | Jul 2015 | CN |
0117940 | Sep 1984 | EP |
1226795 | Jul 2002 | EP |
2020557 | Nov 1979 | GB |
2015-525638 | Sep 2015 | JP |
2017-500153 | Jan 2017 | JP |
95-05209 | Feb 1995 | WO |
98-38930 | Sep 1998 | WO |
00-16705 | Mar 2000 | WO |
02-055146 | Jul 2002 | WO |
02-85092 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2010-014777 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2014-012049 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2015-100178 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2017-091554 | Jun 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Feldman, “Transcatheter Aspiration of a Thrombus in an Aortocoronary Saphenous Vein Graft,” American Journal of Cardiology, 60(4):379-380 ( 1987). |
Penumbra, Inc., “Penumbra, Inc. Completes Pivotal Stroke Trial of Intracranial Revascularization” Press Release (2007). |
Penumbra, Inc , “The Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial: Safety and Effectiveness of a New Generation of Mechanical Devices for Clot Removal in Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusive Disease,” Stroke, 40:2761-2768 (2009). |
Penumbra, Inc., “The Penumbra System®: Continuous Aspiration Thrombectomy (CAT),” Marketing Brochure © 2010 (6 pages). |
Penumbra, Inc., “5Max™: Direct Aspiration™ Enables Choice,” Marketing brochure © 2013 (6 pages). |
Reeder et al., “Aspiration Thrombectomy for Removal of Coronary Thrombosis,” American Journal of Cardiology, 70:107-110 (Jul. 1, 1992) (Abstract only). |
Webb et al., “Retrieval and Analysis of Particulate Debris After Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 34(2);468-475 (1999). |
Yoo et al., “The Penumbra Stroke System: a technical review,” Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 4:199-205 (2012). |
Abstracts from the 2007 International Stroke Conference, Stroke, 38(2):453-607 (2007). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from co-pending application, PCT/US2018/034197, dated Jul. 30, 2018 (12 pages). |
Endovascular Today, “First Stroke Patients Treated With Insera's Clear Cyclical Aspiration System”, www.evtoday.com/news/first-stroke-patients-treated-with-inseras-clear-cyclical-aspiration-system, (Oct. 7, 2019). (Abstract Only). |
Good et al., “Hydrodynamics in Acute Ischemic Stroke Catheters Under Static and Cyclic Aspiration Conditions,” Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology, vol. 11 (6), Dec. 2020, 689-698. |
Simon et al., “Exploring the efficacy of cyclic vs static aspiration in a cerebral thrombectomy model: an initial proof of concept study”, Trauma Surgery & Acute Careopen, vol. 6 No. 9, (2013). (Abstract Only). |
European Search Report from co-pending application No. 18806441.4, for PCT/US2018/034197, dated Feb. 2, 2021. |
Office Action from corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-564913 dated Apr. 19, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190381221 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15604058 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 16552343 | US |