Patent Application
20200157285
The present invention relates to a process for the preparation of a sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) by converting a reaction mixture (RG) which comprises, among others, at least one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone, at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone and at least one aromatic dihydroxy component comprising trimethylhydroquinone. The present invention furthermore relates to a sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtainable by the inventive process and to its use in a membrane (M). Furthermore, the present invention relates to a membrane (M) comprising this sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) and to a method for the preparation of the membrane (M).
Polyarylene ether sulfone polymers are high-performance thermoplastics in that they feature high heat resistance, good mechanical properties and inherent flame retardancy (E. M. Koch, H.-M. Walter, Kunststoffe 80 (1990) 1146; E. Döring, Kunststoffe 80, (1990) 1149, N. Inchaurondo-Nehm, Kunststoffe 98, (2008) 190). Polyarylene ether sulfone polymers are highly biocompatible and so are also used as material for forming dialysis membranes (N. A. Hoenich, K. P. Katapodis, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 3853).
Polyarylene ether sulfone polymers can be formed inter alia either via the hydroxide method, wherein a salt is first formed from the dihydroxy component and the hydroxide, or via the carbonate method.
General information regarding the formation of polyarylene ether sulfone polymers by the hydroxide method is found inter alia in R. N. Johnson et. al., J. Polym. Sci. A-1 5 (1967) 2375, while the carbonate method is described in J. E. McGrath et. al., Polymer (1984) 1827.
Methods of forming polyarylene ether sulfone polymers from aromatic bishalogen compounds and aromatic bisphenols or salts thereof in an aprotic solvent in the presence of one or more alkali metal or ammonium carbonates or bicarbonates are known to a person skilled in the art and are described in EP-A 297 363 and EP-A 135 130, for example.
High-performance thermoplastics such as polyarylene ether sulfone polymers are formed by polycondensation reactions which are typically carried out at a high reaction temperature in polar aprotic solvents, for example DMF (dimethylformamide), DMAc (dimethylacetamide), sulfolane, DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide) and NMP (N-methylpyrrolidone).
Rose et al., Polymer 1996, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 1735-1743 describe the preparation of sulfonated methylated polyarylene ether sulfones, using, among others, trimethylhydroquinone and 4-dichlorodiphenylsulfone in the presence of potassium carbonate. The polymerization is carried out in the presence of sulfolane and toluene under nitrogen atmosphere. The described polymerization needs thorough removal of water and high reaction temperatures.
DE 3614753 describes the preparation of polyarylene ether sulfones comprising polyaryleneether ether sulfone units and polyarylene sulfone units. A copolymer comprising 12.5 mol-% of units derived from trimethyihydroquinone based on the total amount of units derived from dihydroxy compounds is disclosed.
Applications of polyarylene ether sulfone polymers in polymer membranes are increasingly important. Membrane materials are classified into two broad groups, polymeric materials and non-polymeric materials. Polymeric membranes have been widely used for gas separation because of their relatively low costs and easy processing into hollow fiber membranes for industrial applications. On the other hand, non-polymeric membranes based on ceramics, nanoparticles, metal organic frameworks, carbon nanotubes, zeolites and others tend to have better thermal and chemical stability and higher selectivity for gas separation. Nevertheless their drawbacks of mechanical brittleness, considerable costs, difficulties in pore size control and formation of defect-free layer may render them to be less commercially attractive.
Furthermore, membranes are divided into dense membranes and porous membranes.
Dense membranes comprise virtually no pores and are in particular used for gas separation. Porous membranes comprise pores having a diameter in the range from 1 to 10000 nm and are mainly used in micro-, ultra- and nanofiltration. In particular, porous membranes are suitable as dialysis membranes and as membranes for water purification.
A further disadvantage for some applications is the low hydrophilicity of polyarylether polymers. To increase the hydrophilicity various methods are described. For example, polyethersulfone-polyethylene oxide block copolymers are known. However, these block copolymers have a significantly lower glass transition temperature than the polyethersulfone homopolymers.
Another method to increase the hydrophilicity is the use of sulfonated polyether sulfones. However, these sulfonated polyether sulfones often tend to precipitate very slowly so that membranes obtained therefrom are mechanical instable.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method for forming sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymers (sP) which do not retain the disadvantages of the prior art or only in diminished form. The method shall be performable with short reaction times. Furthermore, the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymers (sP) obtainable by the inventive process shall be suitable for use in membranes.
This object is achieved by a process for the preparation of a sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) comprising step
I) converting a reaction mixture (RG) comprising as components
It has surprisingly been found that solutions comprising the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymers (sP) obtainable by the inventive process can be filtered much faster than solutions comprising polyarylene ether sulfone polymers described in the state of the art. Furthermore, the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymers (sP) obtainable by the inventive process have a significantly increased glass transition temperature (Tg).
Moreover, membranes (M) which are prepared from the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymers (sP) obtainable by the inventive process exhibit a high permeability and a low molecular weight cut-off. Even with high amounts of units derived from the at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone, the inventive sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymers (sP) are suitable for membrane preparation.
The present invention will be described in more detail hereinafter.
Process
In the inventive process the preparation of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymers (sP) comprises step I) converting a reaction mixture (RG) comprising the components (A1), (A2), (B1), (C) and (D) described above.
The components (A1), (A2) and (B1) enter into a polycondensation reaction. Component (D) acts as a solvent and component (C) acts as a base to deprotonate component (B1) during the condensation reaction.
Reaction mixture (RG) is understood to mean the mixture that is used in the process according to the present invention for preparing the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP). In the present case all details given with respect to the reaction mixture (RG) thus, relate to the mixture that is present prior to the polycondensation. The polycondensation takes place during the process according to the invention in which the reaction mixture (RG) reacts by polycondensation of components (A1), (A2) and (B1) to give the target product, the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP). The mixture obtained after the polycondensation which comprises the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) target product is also referred to as product mixture (PG). The product mixture (PG) usually furthermore comprises the at least one aprotic polar solvent (component (D)) and a halide compound. The halide compound is formed during the conversion of the reaction mixture (RG). During the conversion first, component (C) reacts with component (B1) to deprotonate component (B1). Deprotonated component (B1) then reacts with components (A1) and/or (A2) wherein the halide compound is formed. This process is known to the person skilled in the art.
The components of the reaction mixture (RG) are generally reacted concurrently. The individual components may be mixed in an upstream step and subsequently be reacted. It is also possible to feed the individual components into a reactor in which these are mixed and then reacted.
In the process according to the invention, the individual components of the reaction mixture (RG) are generally reacted concurrently in step I). This reaction is preferably conducted in one stage. This means, that the deprotonation of component (B1) and also the condensation reaction between components (A1), (A2) and (B1) take place in a single reaction stage without isolation of the intermediate products, for example the deprotonated species of component (B1).
The process according to step I) of the invention is carried out according to the so called “carbonate method”. The process according to the invention is not carried out according to the so called “hydroxide method”. This means, that the process according to the invention is not carried out in two stages with isolation of phenolate anions. Therefore, in a preferred embodiment, the reaction mixture (RG) is essentially free from sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide. More preferably, the reaction mixture (RG) is essentially free from alkali metal hydroxides and alkali earth metal hydroxides.
The term “essentially free” in the present case is understood to mean that the reaction mixture (RG) comprises less than 100 ppm, preferably less than 50 ppm of sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide, preferably of alkali metal hydroxides and alkali earth metal hydroxides, based on the total weight of the reaction mixture (R0).
It is furthermore preferred that the reaction mixture (RG) does not comprise toluene. It is particularly preferred that the reaction mixture (RG) does not comprise any substance which forms an azeotrope with water.
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a process wherein the reaction mixture (RG) does not comprise any substance which forms an azeotrope with water.
The ratio of component (A1), component (A2) and component (B1) derives in principal from the stoichiometry of the polycondensation reaction which proceeds with theoretical elimination of hydrogen chloride and is established by the person skilled in the art in a known manner.
Preferably, the ratio of halogen end groups derived from components (A1) and (A2) to phenolic end groups derived from component (B1) is adjusted by controlled establishment of an excess of component (B1) in relation to components (A1) and (A2) as starting compound.
More preferably, the molar ratio of component (B1) to components (A1) and (A2) is from 0.96 to 1.08, especially from 0.98 to 1.06, most preferably from 0.985 to 1.05.
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a process wherein the molar ratio of component (B1) to components (A1) and (A2) in the reaction mixture (RG) is in the range from 0.96 to 1.08.
For example, the reaction mixture (RG) comprises from 0.75 to 0.995 mol of component (A1) and from 0.005 to 0.25 mol of component (A2) per 1 mol of component (B1).
Preferably, the conversion in the polycondensation reaction is at least 0.9.
Process step I) for the preparation of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) is typically carried out under conditions of the so called “carbonate method”. This means that the reaction mixture (RG) is reacted under the conditions of the so called “carbonate method”. The reaction (polycondensation reaction) is generally conducted at temperatures in the range from 80 to 250° C., preferably in the range from 100 to 220° C. The upper limit of the temperature is determined by the boiling point of the at least one aprotic polar solvent (component (D)) at standard pressure (1013.25 mbar). The reaction is generally carried out at standard pressure. The reaction is preferably carried out over a time interval of 2 to 12 h, particularly in the range from 3 to 10 h.
The isolation of the obtained sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtained in the process according to the present invention in the product mixture (PG) may be carried out for example by precipitation of the product mixture (PG) in water or mixtures of water with other solvents. The precipitated sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) can subsequently be extracted with water and then be dried. In one embodiment of the invention, the precipitate can also be taken up in an acidic medium. Suitable acids are for example organic or inorganic acids for example carboxylic acid such as acetic acid, propionic acid, succinic acid or citric acid and mineral acids such as hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid or phosphoric acid.
It is possible to filter the product mixture (PG) after step I). The halide compound can thereby be removed.
The present invention therefore also provides a process wherein the process furthermore comprises step
II) filtration of the product mixture (PG) obtained in step I).
Component (A1)
The reaction mixture (RG) comprises from 75 to 99.5 mol-% of at least one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone as component (A1), based on the sum of the mol-% of components (A1) and (A2). Preferably, the reaction mixture (RG) comprises from 80 to 99 mol-% and most preferably from 85 to 98 mol-% of at least one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone as component (A1), based on the sum of the mol-% of components (A1) and (A2).
The term “at least one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone” in the present case, is understood to mean exactly one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone and also mixtures of two or more non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfones.
The at least one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone (component (A1)) is preferably at least one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalodiphenyl sulfone.
The present invention therefore also relates to a method wherein the reaction mixture (RG) comprises at least one non-sulfonated dihalodiphenyl sulfone as component (A1).
“Non-sulfonated” within the context of the present invention means that the aromatic dihalogen sulfone does not comprise groups resulting from the sulfonation of the aromatic dihalogen sulfone. Processes for the sulfonation are known to the skilled person. In particular, “non-sulfonated” within the context of the present invention means that the aromatic dihalogen sulfone does not comprise any —SO2X group wherein X is selected from the group consisting of OH, O and one cation equivalent and a halogen such as CI, Br or I.
“One cation equivalent” within the context of the present invention means one cation of a single positive charge or one charge equivalent of a cation with two or more positive charges, for example Li+, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+ or NH4+.
Component (A1) is preferably used as a monomer. This means that the reaction mixture (RG) comprises component (A1) preferably as a monomer and not as a prepolymer.
Preferred non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfones are non-sulfonated 4,4′-dihalodiphenyl sulfones. Particular preference is given to 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone, 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone and/or 4,4′-dibromodiphenyl sulfone. 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone and 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone are particularly preferred, while 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone is most preferred.
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a process wherein component (A1) is selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone and 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone.
The present invention therefore also relates to a method wherein component (A1) comprises at least 50% by weight of at least one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone and 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone, based on the total weight of component (A1) in the reaction mixture (RG).
In a particularly preferred embodiment, component (A1) comprises at least 80% by weight, preferably at least 90% by weight, more preferably at least 98% by weight, of at least one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone and 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone, based on the total weight of component (A1) in the reaction mixture (RG).
In a further particularly preferred embodiment, component (A1) consists essentially of at least one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone and 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone.
“Consisting essentially of”, in the present case is understood to mean that component (A1) comprises more than 99% by weight, preferably more than 99.5% by weight, particularly preferably more than 99.9% by weight of at least one non-sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone compound selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone and 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone, based in each case on the total weight of component (A1) in the reaction mixture (RG). In these embodiments, 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone is particularly preferred as component (A1).
In a further preferred embodiment, component (A1) consists of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone.
Component (A2)
The reaction mixture (RG) comprises from 0.5 to 25 mol-% of at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone as component (A2), based on the sum of the mol-% of the components (A1) and (A2).
The term “at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone” in the present case, is understood to mean exactly one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone and also mixtures of two or more sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfones.
“Sulfonated” within the context of the present invention means that the aromatic dihalogen sulfone comprises at least one group resulting from the sulfonation of the aromatic dihalogen sulfone. The sulfonation of aromatic dihalogen sulfones is known to the skilled person. In particular, “sulfonated” means that the aromatic dihalogen sulfone comprises at least one —SO3Y group wherein Y is hydrogen or a cation equivalent.
“Cation equivalent” within the context of the present invention means a cation of a single positive charge or one charge equivalent of a cation with two or more positive charges, for example Li+, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, NH4+, preferably Na+, K+.
“At least one —SO3Y group” within the context of the present invention means precisely one —SO3Y group and also two or more —SO3Y groups. Preferred are precisely two —SO3Y groups. This means that the at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone is preferably at least one disulfonated aromatic halogen sulfone.
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a process wherein component (A2) is at least one disulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone.
The reaction mixture (RG) comprises preferably from 1 to 20 mol-% and more preferably from 2 to 15 mol-% of at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone as component (A2) based on the sum of the mol-% of components (A1) and (A2).
The sum of the mol-% of components (A1) and (A2) usually is 100 mol-%.
Component (A2) is preferably selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-dichloro-diphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt, 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt and 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt.
It is furthermore preferred that component (A2) comprises at least 50% by weight of at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-dichloro-diphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt, 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt and 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt, based on the total weight of component (A2).
The present invention therefore also relates to a method wherein component (A2) comprises at least 50% by weight of at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-dichloro-diphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt, 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt and 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt, based on the total weight of component (A2) in the reaction mixture (RG).
In a particularly preferred embodiment component (A2) comprises at least 80% by weight, preferably at least 90% by weight, more preferably at least 98% by weight of at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-dichloro-diphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt, 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt and 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt, based on the total weight of component (A2) in the reaction mixture (RG).
The terms “sulfonic acid” and “—SO3Y group” in the context of component (A2) are used synonymously and have the same meaning. The term “sulfonic acid” in the 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid and 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid therefore means “—SO3Y group” wherein Y is hydrogen or a cation equivalent.
In a further particularly preferred embodiment component (A2) consists essentially of at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-dichloro-diphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt, 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt and 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt.
“Consisting essentially of” in the present case is understood to mean that component (A2) comprises more than 99% by weight, preferably more than 99.5% by weight, particularly preferably more than 99.9% by weight of at least one sulfonated aromatic dihalogen sulfone selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-dichloro-diphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt, 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid, 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt and 4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt, based on the total weight of component (A2) in the reaction mixture (RG).
4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid and 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt are particularly preferred as component (A2).
In a further particularly preferred embodiment, component (A2) consists of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone-3,3′-sulfonic acid or 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone-3,3′-disulfonic acid disodium salt.
Component (B1)
The reaction mixture (RG) comprises at least one dihydroxy component comprising trimethylhydroquinone as component (B1). The term “at least one dihydroxy component”, in the present case, is understood to mean exactly one dihydroxy component and also mixtures of two or more dihydroxy components. Preferably, component (B1) is precisely one dihydroxy component or a mixture of precisely two dihydroxy components. Most preferred component (B1) is precisely one dihydroxy component.
The dihydroxy components used are typically components having two phenolic hydroxyl groups. Since the reaction mixture (RG) comprises at least one carbonate component, the hydroxyl groups of component (B1) in the reaction mixture (RG) may be present partially in deprotonated form.
Component (B1) is preferably used as a monomer. This means that the reaction mixture (RG) comprises component (B1) preferably as monomer and not as prepolymer.
Component (B1) comprises usually at least 5 mol-%, preferably at least 20 mol-% and more preferably at least 50 mol-% of trimethyihydroquinone based on the total amount of the at least one dihydroxy component. Preferably, component (B1) comprises from 50 to 100 mol-%, more preferably from 80 to 100 mol-% and most preferably from 95 to 100 mol-% of trimethyihydroquinone based on the total amount of the at least one dihydroxy component in the reaction mixture (RG).
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a process wherein component (B1) comprises at least 5 mol-% of trimethyihydroquinone based on the total amount of component (B1).
In a preferred embodiment, component (B1) consists essentially of trimethylhydroquinone.
“Consisting essentially of” in the present case is understood to mean that component (B1) comprises more than 99 mol-%, preferably more than 99.5 mol-%, particular preferably more than 99.9 mol-% of trimethyihydroquinone based in each case on the total amount of component (B1) in the reaction mixture (RG).
In a further preferred embodiment, component (B1) consists of trimethyihydroquinone.
Trimethylhydroquinone is also known as 2,3,5-trimethylhydroquinone. It has the CAS-number 700-13-0. Methods for its preparation are known to the skilled person.
Suitable further dihydroxy components that can be comprised as component (B1) are known to the skilled person and are for example selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-dihydroxybiphenyl and 4,4′-dihydroxydiphenyl sulfone. In principal, other aromatic dihydroxy compounds can also be comprised such as bisphenol A (IUPAC-name: 4,4′-(propane-2,2-diyl)diphenol).
Component (C)
The reaction mixture (RG) comprises at least one carbonate component as component (C). The term “at least one carbonate component” in the present case, is understood to mean exactly one carbonate component and also mixtures of two or more carbonate components. The at least one carbonate component is preferably at least one metal carbonate. The metal carbonate is preferably anhydrous.
Preference is given to alkali metal carbonates and/or alkaline earth metal carbonates as metal carbonates. At least one metal carbonate selected from the group consisting of sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate and calcium carbonate is particularly preferred as metal carbonate. Potassium carbonate is most preferred.
For example, component (C) comprises at least 50% by weight, more preferred at least 70% by weight and most preferred at least 90% by weight of potassium carbonate based on the total weight of the at least one carbonate component in the reaction mixture (RG).
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a process wherein component (C) comprises at least 50% by weight of potassium carbonate, based on the total weight of component (C).
In a preferred embodiment component (C) consists essentially of potassium carbonate.
“Consisting essentially of” in the present case is understood to mean that component (C) comprises more than 99% by weight, preferably more than 99.5% by weight, particular preferably more than 99.9% by weight of potassium carbonate based in each case on the total weight of component (C) in the reaction mixture (RG).
In a particularly preferred embodiment component (C) consists of potassium carbonate.
Potassium carbonate having a volume weighted average particle size of less than 200 μm is particularly preferred as potassium carbonate. The volume weighted average particle size of the potassium carbonate is determined in a suspension of potassium carbonate in N-methylpyrrolidone using a particle size analyser.
In a preferred embodiment, the reaction mixture (RG) does not comprise any alkali metal hydroxides or alkaline earth metal hydroxides.
Component (D)
The reaction mixture (RG) comprises at least one aprotic polar solvent as component (D). “At least one aprotic polar solvent”, according to the invention, is understood to mean exactly one aprotic polar solvent and also mixtures of two or more aprotic polar solvents.
Suitable aprotic polar solvents are, for example, selected from the group consisting of anisole, dimethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, N-methylpyrrolidone, N-ethylpyrrolidone and N-dimethylacetamide.
Preferably, component (D) is selected from the group consisting of N-methylpyrrolidone, N-dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide and dimethylformamide. N-methylpyrrolidone is particularly preferred as component (D).
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a process wherein component (D) is selected from the group consisting of N-methylpyrrolidone, N-dimethylacetamide, dimethyl sulfoxide and dimethylformamide.
It is preferred that component (D) does not comprise sulfolane. It is furthermore preferred that the reaction mixture (RG) does not comprise sulfolane.
It is preferred that component (D) comprises at least 50% by weight of at least one solvent selected from the group consisting of N-methylpyrrolidone, N-dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide and dimethylformamide based on the total weight of component (D) in the reaction mixture (RG). N-methylpyrrolidone is particularly preferred as component (D).
In a further preferred embodiment, component (D) consists essentially of N-methylpyrrolidone.
“Consist essentially of”, in the present case, is understood to mean that component (D) comprises more than 98% by weight, particularly preferably more than 99% by weight, more preferably more than 99.5% by weight, of at least one aprotic polar solvent selected from the group consisting of N-methylpyrrolidone, N-dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide and dimethylformamide with preference given to N-methylpyrrolidone.
In a preferred embodiment, component (D) consists of N-methylpyrrolidone. N-methylpyrrolidone is also referred to as NMP or N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone.
Sulfonated Polyarylether Sulfone Polymer (sP)
The sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtainable by the inventive process comprises units that are derived from component (A1), units that are derived from component (A2) and units that are derived from component (B1). In a preferred embodiment, the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) consists of units that are derived from component (A1), units that are derived from component (A2) and units that are derived from component (B1).
In a further preferred embodiment, the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) comprises units of formula (Ia) and/or formula (Ib) and units of formula (IIa) and/or formula (IIb).
In formulae (Ia), (Ib), (IIa) and (IIb) * indicates a bond. This bond can, for example, be a link to another unit of any of formulae (Ia), (Ib), (IIa) or (IIb) or a link to a hydroxyl or a halogen endgroup.
To the person skilled in the art it is clear that formulae (Ia), (Ib), (IIa) and (IIb) encompass possible isomers of the formulae as well.
It is preferred that the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) comprises from 0.5 to 25 mol-% of units of the formulae (IIa) and/or (IIb), more preferably in the range from 1 to 20 mol-% and most preferably in the range from 2 to 15 mol-% of units of formulae (IIa) and/or (IIb), based on the total amount of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP).
The sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtainable by the inventive process preferably has a weight average molecular weight (Mw) in the range from 15 000 to 180 000 g/mol, more preferably in the range from 20 000 to 150 000 g/mol and particularly preferably in the range from 25 000 to 125 000 g/mol, determined by GPC (Gel Permeation Chromatography). GPC-Analysis is done using dimethylacetamide with 0.5 wt. % LiBr as solvent, the polymer concentration is 4 mg/mL. The system was calibrated with PMMA-standards. As columns three different polyestercopolymer based units were used. After dissolving the material, the obtained solution was filtered using a filter with 0.2 μm pore size, then 100 μL solution were injected into the system, the elution rate was set at 1 mL/min.
The sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtainable by the inventive process furthermore, has preferably a number average molecular weight (Mn) in the range from 5 000 to 75 000 g/mol, more preferably in the range from 6 000 to 60 000 g/mol and particularly preferably in the range from 7 500 to 50 000 g/mol, determined by GPC (Gel Permeation Chromatography). GPC-analysis is performed as described above.
The glass transition temperature (Tg) of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) is typically in the range from 230 to 260° C., preferably in the range from 235 to 255° C. and particularly preferably in the range from 240 to 250° C. determined via differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) with a heating rate of 10 K/min in the second heating cycle.
The viscosity number (V.N.) of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) is determined as a 1% solution in N-methylpyrrolidone at 25° C. The viscosity number (V.N.) is typically in the range from 50 to 120 ml/g, preferably in the range from 55 to 100 ml/g and most preferably in the range from 60 to 90 ml/g.
The sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) usually comprises halogen-endgroups which are derived from component (A1) and/or component (A2) and/or hydroxy end groups derived from component (B1). This is known to the person skilled in the art.
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtainable by the inventive process.
Membrane (M)
The sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtained by the inventive process can be used in a membrane (M).
Another object of the present invention is therefore also the use of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtainable by the inventive process in a membrane (M).
A further object of the present invention is a membrane (M) which comprises the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) which is obtainable by the above described process.
Therefore, another object of the present invention is also a membrane (M) comprising a sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtainable by the inventive process.
The membrane (M) comprises preferably at least 50% by weight of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP), more preferably at least 70% by weight and most preferably at least 90% by weight of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) based on the total weight of the membrane (M).
In a further preferred embodiment, the membrane (M) consists essentially of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP).
“Consisting essentially of” means that the membrane (M) comprises more than 93% by weight, preferably more than 95% by weight and most preferably more than 97% by weight of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) based on the total weight of the membrane (M).
During the formation of the membrane (M) the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) is separated from the at least one solvent. Therefore, the obtained membrane (M) is essentially free from the at least one solvent.
“Essentially free” within the context of the present invention means that the membrane (M) comprises at most 7% by weight, preferably at most 5% by weight and particularly preferably at most 3% by weight of the at least one solvent based on the total weight of the membrane (M). The membrane (M) comprises at least 0.0001% by weight, preferably at least 0.001% by weight and particularly preferably at least 0.01% by weight of the at least one solvent based on the total weight of the membrane (M).
To the person skilled in the art it is clear that if in one embodiment of the present invention additives for the membrane preparation are used in the preparation of the membrane (M) then the membrane (M) usually furthermore comprises the additives for the membrane preparation. For example, the membrane (M) then comprises in the range from 0.1 to 10% by weight, preferably in the range from 0.15 to 7.5% by weight and most preferably in the range from 0.2 to 5% by weight of the additives for membrane preparation, based on the total weight of the membrane (M).
During the preparation of the membrane (M) the solvent exchange usually leads to an asymmetric membrane structure. This is known to the skilled person. Therefore, the membrane (M) is preferably asymmetric. In an asymmetric membrane the pore size increases from the top layer, which is used for separation, to the bottom of the membrane.
Another object of the present invention is therefore a membrane (M) wherein the membrane (M) is asymmetric.
In one embodiment of the present invention the membrane (M) is porous.
Therefore, another object of the present invention is a membrane (M) wherein the membrane (M) is a porous membrane.
If the membrane (M) is a porous membrane then the membrane (M) typically comprises pores. The pores usually have a diameter in the range from 1 nm to 10 000 nm, preferably in the range from 2 to 500 nm and particularly preferably in the range from 5 to 250 nm determined via filtration experiments using a solution containing different PEG's (polyethyleneglycols) covering a molecular weight from 300 to 1 000 000 g/mol. By comparing the GPC-traces of the feed and the filtrate, the retention of the membrane for each molecular weight can be determined. The molecular weight, where the membrane shows a 90% retention is considered as the molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) for this membrane under the given conditions. Using the known correlation between the Stoke diameters of PEG and their molecular weights, the mean pore size of a membrane can be determined. Details about this method are given in the literature (Chung, J. Membr. Sci. 531 (2017) 27-37).
A porous membrane is typically obtained if the membrane (M) is prepared via a phase inversion process.
In another embodiment of the present invention the membrane (M) is a dense membrane.
Therefore, another object of the present invention is also a membrane (M) wherein the membrane (M) is a dense membrane.
Another object of the present invention is also a membrane (M) wherein the membrane (M) is a dense membrane or a porous membrane.
If the membrane (M) is a dense membrane then the membrane (M) typically comprises virtually no pores.
A dense membrane is typically obtained by a solution casting process in which a solvent comprised in the casted solution is evaporated. Usually the solution (S) is casted on a support, which might be another polymer like polysulfone or celluloseacetate. On top of the membrane (M) sometimes a layer of polydimethylsiloxane is applied.
The membrane (M) can have any thickness. For example, the thickness of the membrane (M) is in the range from 2 to 1000 μm, preferably in the range from 3 to 300 μm and most preferably in the range from 5 to 150 μm.
The inventive membrane (M) can be used in any processes known to the skilled person in which membranes are used.
In particular, if the membrane (M) is a dense membrane, it is particular suitable for the gas separation.
Another object of the present invention is therefore also the use of the membrane (M) for gas separation.
In another embodiment, the membrane (M) is used for nanofiltration, ultrafiltration and/or microfiltration. The membrane (M) is particular suitable for nanofiltration, microfiltration and/or ultrafiltration if the membrane (M) is a porous membrane.
Typical nanofiltration, ultrafiltration and microfiltration processes are known to the skilled person. For example, the membrane (M) can be used in a dialysis process as dialysis membrane.
The sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtainable by the inventive process is particular suitable for dialysis membranes due to its good biocompatibility.
Membrane Preparation
A membrane (M) can be prepared from the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) according to the present invention by any method known to the skilled person.
Preferably, a membrane (M) comprising the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtainable by the inventive process is prepared by a method comprising the steps
Another object of the present invention is therefore a method for the preparation of an inventive membrane (M), wherein the method comprises the steps
Step i)
In step i) a solution (S) is provided which comprises the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) and at least one solvent.
“At least one solvent” within the context of the present invention means precisely one solvent also a mixture of two or more solvents.
The solution (S) can be provided in step i) by any method known to the skilled person.
For example, the solution (S) can be provided in step i) in customary vessels which may comprise a stirring device and preferably a temperature control device. Preferably, the solution (S) is provided by dissolving the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) in the at least one solvent.
The dissolution of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) in the at least one solvent to provide the solution (S) is preferably effected under agitation.
Step i) is preferably carried out at elevated temperatures, especially in the range from 20 to 120° C., more preferably in the range from 40 to 100° C. A person skilled in the art will choose the temperature in accordance with the at least one solvent.
The solution (S) preferably comprises the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) completely dissolved in the at least one solvent. This means that the solution (S) preferably comprises no solid particles of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP). Therefore, the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) preferably cannot be separated from the at least one solvent by filtration.
The solution (S) preferably comprises from 0.001 to 50% by weight of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) based on the total weight of the solution (S).
More preferably, the solution (S) in step i) comprises from 0.1 to 30% by weight of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) and most preferably the solution (S) comprises from 0.5 to 25% by weight of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) based on the total weight of the solution (S).
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a method for the preparation of a membrane (M) wherein the solution (S) in step i) comprises from 0.1 to 30% by weight of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP), based on the total weight of the solution (S).
As the at least one solvent, any solvent known to the skilled person for the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) is suitable. Preferably, the at least one solvent is soluble in water. Therefore, the at least one solvent is preferably selected from the group consisting of N-methylpyrrolidone, dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide, dimethyllactamide, dimethylformamide and sulfolane. N-methylpyrrolidone and dimethyllactamide are particularly preferred. Dimethyllactamide is most preferred as the at least one solvent.
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a method for the preparation of a membrane (M) wherein the at least one solvent is selected from the group consisting of N-methylpyrrolidone, dimethylacetamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylformamide, dimethyllactamid and sulfolane.
The solution (S) preferably comprises in the range from 50 to 99.999% by weight of the at least one solvent, more preferably in the range from 70 to 99.9% by weight and most preferably in the range from 75 to 99.5% by weight of the at least one solvent based on the total weight of the solution (S).
The solution (S) provided in step i) can furthermore comprise additives for the membrane preparation.
Suitable additives for the membrane preparation are known to the skilled person and are, for example, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyethylene oxide (PEO), polyethylene oxide-polypropylene oxide copolymer (PEO-PPO) and poly(tetrahydrofurane) (poly-THF). Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and polyethylene oxide (PEO) are particularly preferred as additives for the membrane preparation.
The additives for membrane preparation can, for example, be comprised in the solution (S) in an amount of from 0.01 to 20% by weight, preferably in the range from 0.1 to 15% by weight and more preferably in the range from 1 to 10% by weight based on the total weight of the solution (S).
To the person skilled in the art it is clear that the percentages by weight of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP), the at least one solvent and the optionally comprised additive for membrane preparation comprised in the solution (S) typically add up to 100% by weight.
The duration of step i) may vary between wide limits. The duration of step i) is preferably in the range from 10 min to 48 h (hours), especially in the range from 10 min to 24 h and more preferably in the range from 15 min to 12 h. A person skilled in the art will choose the duration of step i) so as to obtain a homogeneous solution of the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) in the at least one solvent.
For the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) comprised in the solution (S) the embodiments and preferences given for the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) obtained in the inventive process hold true.
Step ii)
In step ii) the at least one solvent is separated from the solution (S) to obtain the membrane (M). It is possible to filter the solution (S) provided in step i) before the at least one solvent is separated from the solution (S) in step ii) to obtain a filtered solution (fS). The following embodiments and preferences for separating the at least one solvent from the solution (S) apply equally for separating the at least one solvent from the filtered solution (fS) which is used in this embodiment of the invention.
Moreover, it is possible to degas the solution (S) in step i) before the at least one solvent is separated from the solution (S) in step ii) to obtain a degassed solution (dS). This embodiment is preferred. The following embodiments and preferences for separating the at least one solvent from the solution (S) apply equally for separating the at least one solvent from the degassed solution (dS) which is used in this embodiment of the invention.
The degassing of the solution (S) in step i) can be carried out by any method known to the skilled person, for example via vacuum or by allowing the solution (S) to rest.
The separation of the at least one solvent from the solution (S) can be performed by any method known to the skilled person which is suitable to separate solvents from polymers.
Preferably, the separation of the at least one solvent from the solution (S) is carried out via a phase inversion process.
Another object of the present invention is therefore also a method for the preparation of a membrane (M), wherein the separation of the at least one solvent in step ii) is carried out via a phase inversion process.
If the separation of the at least one solvent is carried out via a phase inversion process, the obtained membrane (M) is typically a porous membrane.
A phase inversion process within the context of the present invention means a process wherein the dissolved sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) is transformed into a solid phase. Therefore, a phase inversion process can also be denoted as precipitation process. According to step ii) the transformation is performed by separation of the at least one solvent from the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP). The person skilled in the art knows suitable phase inversion processes.
The phase inversion process can, for example, be performed by cooling down the solution (S). During this cooling down, the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) comprised in this solution (S) precipitates. Another possibility to perform the phase inversion process is to bring the solution (S) in contact with a gaseous liquid that is a non-solvent for the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP). The sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) will then as well precipitate. Suitable gaseous liquids that are non-solvents for the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) are for example protic polar solvents described hereinafter in their gaseous state. Another phase inversion process which is preferred within the context of the present invention is the phase inversion by immersing the solution (S) into at least one protic polar solvent.
Therefore, in one embodiment of the present invention, in step ii) the at least one solvent comprised in the solution (S) is separated from the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) comprised in the solution (S) by immersing the solution (S) into at least one protic polar solvent.
This means that the membrane (M) is formed by immersing the solution (S) into at least one protic polar solvent.
Suitable at least one protic polar solvents are known to the skilled person. The at least one protic polar solvent is preferably a non-solvent for the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP).
Preferred at least one protic polar solvents are water, methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, iso-propanol, glycerol, ethyleneglycol and mixtures thereof.
Step ii) usually comprises a provision of the solution (S) in a form that corresponds to the form of the membrane (M) which is obtained in step ii).
Therefore, in one embodiment of the present invention step ii) comprises a casting of the solution (S) to obtain a film of the solution (S) or a passing of the solution (S) through at least one spinneret to obtain at least one hollow fiber of the solution (S).
Therefore, in one preferred embodiment of the present invention, step ii) comprise the following steps:
This means that the membrane (M) is formed by evaporating the at least one solvent from a film of the solution (S).
In step ii-1) the solution (S) can be cast by any method known to the skilled person. Usually, the solution (S) is cast with a casting knife that is heated to a temperature in the range from 20 to 150° C., preferably in the range from 40 to 100° C.
The solution (S) is usually cast on a substrate that does not react with the sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymer (sP) or the at least one solvent comprised in the solution (S).
Suitable substrates are known to the skilled person and are, for example, selected from glass plates and polymer fabrics such as non-woven materials.
To obtain a dense membrane, the separation in step ii) is typically carried out by evaporation of the at least one solvent comprised in the solution (S).
The present invention is further elucidated by the following working examples without limiting it thereto.
Components Used
DCDPS: 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone,
TMH: trimethyihydroquinone,
DHDPS: 4,4′-dihydroxydiphenyl sulfone,
sDCDPS: 3,3′-Disodiumdisulfone-4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone
Bisphenol A: 4,4′-(propane-2,2-diyl)diphenol,
Potassium carbonate: K2CO3; anhydrous; volume-average particle size of 32.4 μm,
NMP: N-methylpyrrolidone,
PVP: polyvinylpyrrolidone (Luvitec® K40)
PEG: polyethyleneglycol
DMAc: dimethylacetamide
General Procedures
The viscosity number of the polymers is determined in a 1% solution in NMP at 25° C.
The isolation of the polymers is carried out by dripping a NMP solution of the polymers in demineralized water at room temperature (25° C.). The drop height is 0.5 m, the throughput is about 2.5 I/h. The beads obtained are then extracted with water (water throughput 160 I/h) at 85° C. for 20 h. The beads are dried at 150° C. for 24 h (hours) at reduced pressure (<100 mbar).
The glass transition temperature (Tg) of the obtained products is determined via differential scanning calorimetry at a heating ramp of 10 K/min in the second heating cycle.
The number average molecular weights (Mn) and the weight average molecular weights (Mw) are determined via GPC in DMAc/LiBr with PMMA (poly(methylmethacrylate)) standards.
The incorporation rate (incorporation ratio) of TMH and sDCDPS was determined by 1H-NMR in CDCl3.
In a 4 liter glass reactor fitted with a thermometer, a gas inlet tube and a Dean-Stark-trap, 565.68 g (1.97 mol) of DCDPS, 304.38 g (2.00 mol) of TMH, 24.76 g (0.05 mol) of sDCDPS and 331.7 g (2.40 mol) of potassium carbonate were suspended in 950 ml NMP in a nitrogen atmosphere.
The mixture was heated to 190° C. within one hour. In the following, the reaction time shall be understood to be the time during which the reaction mixture was maintained at 190° C. The water that was formed in the reaction was continuously removed by distillation. After a reaction time of 6 hours, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 2050 ml NMP and cooling down to room temperature (within one hour). The potassium chloride formed in the reaction was removed by filtration. The time to filter the viscous solution in a pressure filter using N2-pressure of 4 bar and a filter plate with 5 μm pore size was recorded for the different batches.
In a 4 liter glass reactor fitted with a thermometer, a gas inlet tube and a Dean-Stark-trap, 551.53 g (1.92 mol) of DCDPS, 304.38 g (2.00 mol) of TMH, 49.53 g (0.10 mol) of sDCDPS and 331.7 g (2.40 mol) of potassium carbonate were suspended in 950 ml NMP in a nitrogen atmosphere.
The mixture was heated to 190° C. within one hour. In the following, the reaction time shall be understood to be the time during which the reaction mixture was maintained at 190° C. The water that was formed in the reaction was continuously removed by distillation. After a reaction time of 7 hours, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 2050 ml NMP and cooling down to room temperature (within one hour). The potassium chloride formed in the reaction was removed by filtration. The time to filter the viscous solution in a pressure filter using N2-pressure of 4 bar and a filter plate with 5 μm pore size was recorded for the different batches.
In a 4 liter glass reactor fitted with a thermometer, a gas inlet tube and a Dean-Stark-trap, 536.97 g (1.87 mol) of DCDPS, 304.38 g (2.00 mol) of TMH, 74.30 g (0.15 mol) of sDCDPS and 331.7 g (2.40 mol) of potassium carbonate were suspended in 950 ml NMP in a nitrogen atmosphere.
The mixture was heated to 190° C. within one hour. In the following, the reaction time shall be understood to be the time during which the reaction mixture was maintained at 190° C. The water that was formed in the reaction was continuously removed by distillation. After a reaction time of 8 hours, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 2050 ml NMP and cooling down to room temperature (within one hour). The potassium chloride formed in the reaction was removed by filtration. The time to filter the viscous solution in a pressure filter using N2-pressure of 4 bar and a filter plate with 5 μm pore size was recorded for the different batches.
In a 4 liter glass reactor fitted with a thermometer, a gas inlet tube and a Dean-Stark-trap, 536.97 g (1.87 mol) of DCDPS, 425.48 g (1.7 mol) DHDPS, 45.65 g (0.30 mol) of TMH, 74.30 g (0.15 mol) of sDCDPS and 331.7 g (2.40 mol) of potassium carbonate were suspended in 950 ml NMP in a nitrogen atmosphere.
The mixture was heated to 190° C. within one hour. In the following, the reaction time shall be understood to be the time during which the reaction mixture was maintained at 190° C. The water that was formed in the reaction was continuously removed by distillation. After a reaction time of 8 hours, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 2050 ml NMP and cooling down to room temperature (within one hour). The potassium chloride formed in the reaction was removed by filtration. The time to filter the viscous solution in a pressure filter using N2-pressure of 4 bar and a filter plate with 5 μm pore size was recorded for the different batches.
In a 4 liter glass reactor fitted with a thermometer, a gas inlet tube and a Dean-Stark-trap, 565.68 g (1.97 mol) of DCDPS, 500.56 g (2.00 mol) of DHDPS, 24.76 g (0.05 mol) of sDCDPS and 331.7 g (2.40 mol) of potassium carbonate were suspended in 950 ml NMP in a nitrogen atmosphere.
The mixture was heated to 190° C. within one hour. In the following, the reaction time shall be understood to be the time during which the reaction mixture was maintained at 190° C. The water that was formed in the reaction was continuously removed by distillation. After a reaction time of 6 hours, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 2050 ml NMP and cooling down to room temperature (within one hour). The potassium chloride formed in the reaction was removed by filtration. The time to filter the viscous solution in a pressure filter using N2-pressure of 4 bar and a filter plate with 5 μm pore size was recorded for the different batches.
In a 4 liter glass reactor fitted with a thermometer, a gas inlet tube and a Dean-Stark-trap, 536.97 g (1.87 mol) of DCDPS, 425.48 g (1.7 mol) DHDPS, 33,033 g (0.30 mol) of hydrochinon (HQ), 74.30 g (0.15 mol) of sDCDPS and 331.7 g (2.40 mol) of potassium carbonate were suspended in 950 ml NMP in a nitrogen atmosphere.
The mixture was heated to 190° C. within one hour. In the following, the reaction time shall be understood to be the time during which the reaction mixture was maintained at 190° C. The water that was formed in the reaction was continuously removed by distillation. After a reaction time of 6 hours, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 2050 ml NMP and cooling down to room temperature (within one hour). The potassium chloride formed in the reaction was removed by filtration. The time to filter the viscous solution in a pressure filter using N2-pressure of 4 bar and a filter plate with 5 μm pore size was recorded for the different batches.
In a 4 liter glass reactor fitted with a thermometer, a gas inlet tube and a Dean-Stark-trap, 344.58 g (1.2 mol) of DCDPS, 425.48 g (1.7 mol) DHDPS, 33,033 g (0.30 mol) of hydrochinon (HQ), 396.28 g (0.8 mol) of sDCDPS and 331.7 g (2.40 mol) of potassium carbonate were suspended in 950 ml NMP in a nitrogen atmosphere.
The mixture was heated to 190° C. within one hour. In the following, the reaction time shall be understood to be the time during which the reaction mixture was maintained at 190° C. The water that was formed in the reaction was continuously removed by distillation. After a reaction time of 6 hours, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 2050 ml NMP and cooling down to room temperature (within one hour). The potassium chloride formed in the reaction was removed by filtration. The isolation via precipitation as described under “General Procedures” was not possible. Therefore, the polymer was isolated by removal of the solvent. The time to filter the viscous solution in a pressure filter using N2-pressure of 4 bar and a filter plate with 5 μm pore size was recorded for the different batches. Due to the solvent residual no characterization was done.
As can be seen from table 1, using the inventive process, sDCDPS can be incorporated into PESU-TMH with more than 85% yield, surprisingly the time to filter the polymer solution is significantly shorter than in the case of the sPESU.
Compared to sPPSU (sulfonated polyphenylene sulfone), which is known from the literature, the Tg of the new sulfonated Polymers is significantly increased (Tg sPPSU10=228.5° C. in Wang, Sep. Purl. Techn. 98 (2012) 298).
Preparation of Membranes
Membranes were prepared by adding 78 ml of NMP, 5 g of PVP and 17 g of polymer into a three neck flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer. This mixture is then heated under gentle stirring at 60° C. until a homogeneous clear viscous solution is obtained. The solution is degassed over night at room temperature. After that, the solution is re-heated at 60° C. for 2 h and casted onto a glass plate with a casting knife (300 microns) at 60° C. at a speed of 5 mm/min. The obtained film is then allowed to rest for 30 sec and subsequently immersed into a water bath at 25° C. for 10 min. After the membrane is detached from the glass plate, the membrane is carefully transferred into a water bath for 12 h. Afterwards, the membrane is transferred into a bath containing 250 ppm NaOCl at 50° C. for 4.5 h. The membrane is washed with water at 60° C. and a 0.5 weight-% solution of Na-bisulfit to remove active chlorine. A membrane having a dimension of at least 10×15 cm size is obtained.
To test the pure water permeation (PWP) of the membranes, ultrapure water (salt-free water filtered by a Millipore UF-system) using a pressure cell with a diameter of 60 mm, is used. In a subsequent test a solution of different PEG standards is filtered at a pressure of 0.15 bar. By GPC-measurements of the feed and the permeate, the molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) is determined.
As reference material sulfonated polyphenylene sulfone (sPPSU) prepared according to the procedure described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,199,205 with 5 mol-% sDCDPS and with 7.3 mol-% sDCDPS are used. The viscosity number of the sPPSU prepared with 5 mol-% sDCDPS is 80.2 mVg and the viscosity number of sPPSU prepared from 7.3 mol-% sDCDPS is 76.1 mVg.
The results are shown in table 2.
The inventive sulfonated polyarylene ether sulfone polymers (sP) form membranes with good permeability and excellent low molecular weight cut-off. Compared to the state of the art membranes the inventive membranes can as well be formed with a higher content of sulfonated aromatic dihalogen compound.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17182259.6 | Jul 2017 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2018/069009 | 7/12/2018 | WO | 00 |
