Sulfopolyesters for paper strength and process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8512519
  • Patent Number
    8,512,519
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 22, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 20, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
Sulfopolyester thermoplastic resins provide advantages in papermaking processes and in paper products including paperboard. Improvements in wet strength and dry strength of paper products are achieved by addition of sulfopolyester thermoplastic resins and cationic strength additives during the paper making process. The use of sulfopolyester thermoplastic resins in paper products also significantly enhances the repulpability of the paper.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention provides a method of improving the wet-strength of cellulosic paper while enhancing the repulpability.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Wet strength resins are often added to paper products including paperboard at the time of manufacture. In the absence of wet strength resins, paper normally retains only 3% to 5% of its strength after being wetted with water. However, paper made with wet strength resin generally retains at least 10%-50% of its strength when wet. Wet strength is useful in a wide variety of paper applications, some examples of which are toweling, milk and juice cartons, paper bags, and liner board for corrugated containers.


As stated in Handbook for Pulp and Paper Technologists, Gary A. Smook, Angus Wilde Publications, 1992 (which is incorporated herein by reference): “Paper has traditionally been defined as a felted sheet formed on a fine screen from a water suspension of fibers. Current paper products generally conform to this definition except that most products also contain non-fibrous additives. Dry forming methods are now utilized for the manufacture of a few specialty paper products. Pulp is the fibrous raw material for papermaking. Pulp fibers are usually of vegetable origin, but animal, mineral, or synthetic fibers may be used for special applications. The distinction between paper and paperboard is based on product thickness. Nominally, all sheets above 0.3 mm thickness are classed as paperboard; but enough exceptions are applied to make the distinction somewhat hazy.”


Because of increased commercial emphasis on developing paper products based on recovered or recycled cellulose, there is growing interest in developing paper which is readily repulpable. Paper and paperboard waste materials are difficult to repulp in aqueous systems without special chemical treatment when they contain wet strength resins.


Improving the repulpability of paper containing wet strength resins has generally been achieved by modifying the repulping conditions. However, many conventional repulping processes used for wet strength paper result in the formation of environmentally undesirable chlorine-containing degradation products, involve strong oxidizing agents, or proceed slowly.


There is a need for improved methods for making paper products that will be readily repulpable without significantly lowering the wet and dry strength properties of the paper.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to repulpable paper products comprising: papermaking fibers; cationic strength additives; and sulfopolyester thermoplastic resins.


The present invention also relates to methods of improving the wet-strength of paper which comprises adding to the paper during the papermaking process cationic strength additives; and sulfopolyester thermoplastic resins.


The present invention relates to paper products comprising: papermaking fibers; cationic strength additives; and sulfopolyester thermoplastic resins.


The present invention relates to methods of improving the wet-strength of cellulosic paper comprising adding to the papermaking fibers during the papermaking process cationic strength additives and sulfopolyester thermoplastic resins.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description of the invention and to the Examples included therein.


Before the present compositions of matter and methods are disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to specific synthetic methods or to particular formulations, unless otherwise indicated, and, as such, may vary from the disclosure. It is also to be understood that the terminology used is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention.


The singular forms “a”, “an”, and the the include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.


Optional or optionally means that the subsequently described events or circumstances may or may not occur. The description includes instances where the events or circumstances occur, and instances where they do not occur.


Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as molecular weight, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Ranges may be expressed herein as from about one particular value, and/or to about another particular value. When such a range is expressed, it is to be understood that another embodiment is from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value, along with all combinations within said range. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Further, the ranges stated in this disclosure and the claims are intended to include the entire range specifically and not just the endpoint(s). For example, a range stated to be 0 to 10 is intended to disclose all whole numbers between 0 and 10 such as, for example 1, 2, 3, 4, etc., all fractional numbers between 0 and 10, for example 1.5, 2.3, 4.57, 6.1113, etc., and the endpoints 0 and 10.


Throughout this application, where patents or publications are referenced, the disclosures of these references in their entireties are intended to be incorporated by reference into this application, in order to more fully describe the state of the art to which the invention pertains.


Some relevant technical terms as used in the context of the present invention are meant to be understood as follows (unless specifically indicated otherwise throughout the description).


“Papermaking fibers,” as used herein, include all known cellulosic fibers or fiber mixes comprising cellulosic fibers. Fibers suitable for making the webs of this invention comprise any natural or synthetic cellulosic fibers including, but not limited to non-woody fibers, such as cotton or cotton derivatives, abaca, kenaf, sabai grass, flax, esparto grass, straw, jute hemp, bagasse, milkweed floss fibers, and pineapple leaf fibers; and woody fibers such as those obtained from deciduous and coniferous trees, including softwood fibers, such as northern and southern softwood kraft fibers; hardwood fibers, such as eucalyptus, maple, birch, and aspen. Woody fibers may be prepared in high-yield or low-yield forms and may be pulped in any known method, including kraft, sulfite, groundwood, thermomechanical pulp (TMP), chemithermomechanical pulp (CTMP), and bleached chemithermomechanical pulp (BCTMP), high-yield pulping methods and other known pulping methods. High brightness pulps, including chemically bleached pulps, may be used and unbleached or semi-bleached pulps may also be used. Recycled fibers are included within the scope of the present invention. Any known pulping and bleaching methods may be used. Fibers prepared from organosolv pulping methods may also be used. Suitable papermaking fibers may also include recycled fibers, virgin fibers, or mixes thereof.


Synthetic cellulose fibers are also suitable for use including rayon in all its varieties and other fibers derived from viscose or chemically modified cellulose. Chemically treated natural cellulosic fibers may be used such as mercerized pulps, chemically stiffened or crosslinked fibers, sulfonated fibers, and the like. Suitable synthetic polymeric fibers include rayon, polyolefin fibers, polyester fibers, polyamide fibers and the like. Suitable synthetic polymer fiber structures include monocomponent, bicomponent, and multi component fibers such as core-sheath, islands-in-the-sea, side-by-side, segmented pie, and the like.


In one embodiment of the present invention the papermaking fibers comprise woody fibers, softwood Kraft pulp, hardwood Kraft pulp, recycled fibers, non-woody fibers, synthetic polymeric fibers, glass fibers, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment the synthetic polymeric fibers have a mean fiber diameter of less than 5 microns. In another embodiment the synthetic polymeric fibers comprise greater than 50% of the total papermaking fiber or greater than 70% of the total papermaking fiber.


For good mechanical properties in using papermaking fibers, it may be desirable that the fibers be relatively undamaged and largely unrefined or only lightly refined. While recycled fibers may be used, virgin fibers are also useful for their mechanical properties and lack of contaminants. Mercerized fibers, regenerated cellulosic fibers, cellulose produced by microbes, rayon, and other cellulosic material or cellulosic derivatives may be used. Suitable papermaking fibers may also include recycled fibers, virgin fibers, or mixes thereof.


As used herein, “high yield Pulp fibers” are those papermaking fibers of pulps produced by pulping processes providing a yield of about 65 percent or greater. Yield is the resulting amount of processed fiber expressed as a percentage of the initial wood mass. High yield pulps include bleached chemithermomechanical pulp (BCTMP), chemithermomechanical pulp (CTMP) pressure/pressure thermomechanical pulp (PTMP), thermomechanical pulp (TMP), thermomechanical chemical pulp (TMCP), high yield sulfite pulps, and high yield Kraft pulps, all of which contain fibers having high levels of lignin. Characteristic high-yield fibers can have lignin content by mass of about 1 percent or greater. Suitable high yield pulp fibers, after being prepared by pulping and optional bleaching steps and prior to being formed into dry bales or webs, in one embodiment can also be characterized by being comprised of comparatively whole, relatively undamaged fibers, high freeness (250 Canadian Standard Freeness (CSF) or greater, and low fines content (less than 25 percent by the Britt jar test). In one embodiment, the high-yield fibers are predominately softwood, for example northern softwood.


As used herein, the term “cellulosic” is meant to include any material having cellulose as a major constituent, and specifically comprising about 50 percent or more by weight of cellulose or cellulose derivatives. Thus, the term includes cotton, typical wood pulps, non-woody cellulosic fibers, cellulose acetate, cellulose triacetate, rayon, viscose fibers, thermomechanical wood pulp, chemical wood pulp, debonded chemical wood pulp, lyocell and other fibers formed from solutions of cellulose in NMMO, milkweed, or bacterial cellulose. Fibers that have not been spun or regenerated from solution may be used exclusively, if desired, or at least about 80% of the web may be free of spun fibers or fibers generated from a cellulose solution.


One aspect of the present invention relates to the production of paper products including paper and paper board from an aqueous slurry of papermaking fibers. It was discovered that the paper products of the present invention containing a cationic strength additive and a sulfopolyester thermoplastic resin resulted in paper products with improved or maintained wet strength and dry strength and with significantly enhanced repulpability.


One embodiment of the present invention relates to repulpable paper product comprising: papermaking fibers; cationic strength additives; and thermoplastic sulfopolyester resins.


Another embodiment of the present invention relates to paper product comprising: papermaking fibers; cationic strength additives; and thermoplastic sulfopolyester resins. The paper products according the present invention provide enhance repulpability.


In addition to enhanced repulability the paper products according to the present invention also provide enhanced sheet strength, increased machine speed, and improved retention. The present invention also allows the papermakers to simplify the wet end by reducing or eliminating the use of certain wet end additives, including dry strength resins, cationic starches, drainage and retention aids, and coagulants. When the present invention is used as both a wet and dry strength aid, the absorbency of the paper product is not decreased. The present invention provides the following improvements in sheet performance: lower basis weight, increased recycle fiber utilization, the ability to provide dispersion at higher concentration or in solid form, extended shelf life, reduced Kraft utilization, immediate cure, improved print receptivity, improved surface strength, improved sheet processibility, improved machine runnability, increased production, higher sheet ash content and filler cost savings, improved fiber recovery, reduced whitewater solids and turbidity, increased retention of wet strength additive, reduced system deposition, provides high levels of controllable drainage, improved formation, increased machine speed, reduced dryer energy consumption, simplified and cleaner wet end resulting from fewer additives, cost-effective additive scheme, and wet end chemical efficiency gains.


It is common to include various inorganic and organic materials to the aqueous slurry of pulp or papermaking fibers for improving the paper products and the papermaking process. The process of making the paper products according to the present invention can be carried out on any conventional paper making apparatus.


In general, the process of the present invention includes providing a slurry of papermaking fibers, adding the components of the present invention to the slurry of pulp papermaking fibers, depositing the slurry of pulp papermaking fibers containing the components of the present invention on a forming fabric, and drying the slurry to form a paper web.


In one embodiment of the present invention, the fibrous web to be formed from the papermaking fibers treated in accordance with the present invention may be wet-laid, such as webs may be formed with known papermaking techniques wherein the dilute aqueous fiber slurry is disposed on a moving wire to filter out the fibers and form a paper web which is subsequently dewatered by combinations of units including suction boxes, wet presses, dryer units, and the like. Capillary dewatering may also be applied to remove water from the web.


Any conventional drying method or dryers may be used according to the present invention. Drying operations may include drum drying, through drying, steam drying such as superheated steam drying, displacement dewatering, Yankee drying, infrared drying, microwave drying, radio frequency drying in general, and impulse drying.


A moist fibrous web may also be formed by foam forming processes, wherein the treated fibers are entrained or suspended in a foam prior to dewatering, or wherein foam is applied to a paper web prior to dewatering or drying.


The fibrous web is generally a random plurality of papermaking fibers that can, optionally, be joined together with a binder. Any papermaking fibers, as herein defined, or mixtures thereof may be used, such as bleached fibers from a kraft or sulfite chemical pulping process. Recycled fibers may also be used, as may cotton linters or papermaking fibers comprising cotton. Both high-yield and low-yield fibers may be used. In one embodiment, the fibers may be predominantly hardwood, such as at least 50% hardwood or about 60% hardwood or greater or about 80% hardwood or greater or substantially 100% hardwood. In another embodiment, the web is predominantly softwood, such as at least about 50% softwood or at least about 80% softwood, or about 100% softwood. In another embodiment, the web is predominantly synthetic polymeric fiber, such as at least about 50% synthetic polymeric fiber or at least about 80% synthetic polymeric fiber, or about 100% synthetic polymeric fiber.


The fibrous web of the present invention may be formed from a single layer or multiple layers. Stratified webs may also be formed wherein at least one layer comprises softwood fibers while another layer comprises hardwood or other fiber types. Layered structures produced by any means known in the art are within the scope of the present invention. In the case of multiple layers, the layers are generally positioned in a juxtaposed or surface-to-surface relationship and all or a portion of the layers may be bound to adjacent layers. The paper web may also be formed from a plurality of separate paper webs wherein the separate paper webs may be formed from single or multiple layers.


One embodiment of the present invention provides a method of improving the wet-strength of a cellulosic paper which comprises adding to the paper during the papermaking process a cationic strength additive; and a sulfopolyester thermoplastic resin.


The process for manufacturing paper products or the repulpable paper products according to the present invention comprises a number of steps. One step comprises forming an aqueous slurry of papermaking fibers or pulp or which can be performed by conventional means, i.e., known mechanical, chemical and semi-chemical, etc., pulping processes. Another step comprises adding to the aqueous slurry of papermaking fibers or pulp cationic strength additives and thermoplastic sulfopolyester resins. This can be done at any point, before sheet formation or it can also be applied after sheet formation from a tub size or at a size press or from showers to the dried or partially dried sheet. Yet another step comprises sheeting and drying the aqueous slurry of papermaking or pulp fibers containing the cationic thermosetting resin. This can be done by any conventional means.


In one embodiment, the components of the present invention comprising the cationic strength additives and the thermoplastic sulfopolyester resins are added to the pulp slurry separately, though depending on desired strength characteristics of the web, either the cationic strength additives or the thermoplastic sulfopolyester resins may be added to the slurry before the other.


During the papermaking process, the cationic strength additive can be incorporated by various methods including addition in the pulp fiber slurry or incorporation at the pulp press. In one embodiment of the present invention, the cationic strength additives are added to the slurry before the sulfopolyester thermoplastic resin. Without being bound by any theory, the cationic strength additive bonds to the anionically charged cellulose pulp fibers which results in a positively charged pulp fiber. Subsequently, the anionically charged sulfopolyester thermoplastic resin is applied to pulp fiber which results in an ionic bond. The sulfopolyester resin can be applied by various methods including spray application.


In another embodiment, the process of the present invention includes providing a slurry of pulp or papermaking fibers, sequentially adding the components of the present invention to the aqueous slurry of pulp or papermaking fibers, depositing the slurry of pulp or papermaking fibers containing the components of the present invention on a forming fabric, and drying the slurry to form a paper web. Such components may also be sprayed, printed, or coated onto the web after formation, while wet, or added to the wet end of the papermaking machine prior to formation.


According to the present invention, the components comprising the cationic strength additives and the thermoplastic sulfopolyester resins may be added to the slurry in a ratio from about a 1:5 to about a 5:1, as desired.


The pH of the slurry may be adjusted during the process. For example, the pH of the slurry may be adjusted to an acidic pH, such as about 6 or less in one embodiment. In another embodiment, however, the pH may be adjusted to greater than about 6. When the desired viscosity is reached, sufficient water is then added to adjust the solids content of the resin solution to about 15% or less, the product cooled to about 25° C. and then stabilized by adding sufficient acid to reduce the pH at least to about 6 and preferably to about 5. Any suitable acid such as hydrochloric, sulfuric, nitric, formic, phosphoric and acetic acid may be used to stabilize the product.


The paper web of the present invention may have any conventional bulk weight. In one embodiment, the paper web of the present invention may have a bulk greater than about 2 cc/g. For example, the paper web may have a bulk greater than about 5 cc/g. The dry tensile index of the paper web may be any conventional value. For example, the dry tensile index of the paper web can be greater than about 20 Nm/g in one embodiment. In another embodiment, the dry tensile index of the paper web can be greater than about 22 Nm/g. In yet another embodiment, the dry tensile index can be greater than about 25 Nm/g. In general, the basis weight of the paper webs of the present invention can be any desired basis weight. For instance, in one embodiment, the paper web may have a basis weight between about 5 and about 200 gsm.


Other conventional chemical additives that can be used in the papermaking process according to the present invention are: rosin size, reactive size (alkenyl succinic anhydride or alkyl ketene dimer), surface size, starch, retention aids, drainage aids, formation aids, flocculants, creping aids (adhesives and release agents), dry strength resins (cationic starch, guar gums, polyacrylamides), defoamers, scavengers for anionic trash and stickies control, fillers (clay, calcium carbonate, titanium dioxide), optical brightening aids and dyes.


Cationic Strength Additives


During papermaking and wet laid nonwovens hydraulic manufacturing processes, chemical additives are often incorporated to improve the wet strength and/or dry strength of paper and paperboard products. These chemical additives are commonly known as wet and dry strength additives and are available from a number of commercially available sources.


Examples of permanent wet strength additives include polyamide epichlorohydrin and polyamidoamine epichlorohydrin and are collectively known as PAE resins. Examples of wet strength additives are based on chemistries such as polyacrylamide and glyoxalated polyacrylamide (GPAM) resins.


According to the present invention, the cationic strength additives may consist of either wet strength or dry strength additives and include glyoxylated polyacrylamides, polyacrylamides, polyamide epichlorohydrins (PAEs), starches and other cationic additives well known to those skilled in the art.


Polyamide epichlorohydrin, polyamidoamine epichlorohydrin and polyamine epichlorohydrin resins and are collectively known as PAE resins. PAE resins are widely used in the papermaking industry due to their ability to impart a high degree of wet strength to numerous paper products, including tissue, towel, wipes and corrugated board. PAE resins do not improve the dry strength of paper or paperboard and products containing these resins are generally considered not to be repulpable. Paper products containing wet strength additives, although generally repulpable; often have insufficient wet strength for many applications. Upon complete wetting, paper products derived from wet strength additives typically degrade within minutes to hours.


Suitable cationic strength additives used in accordance with the present invention include PAE resins, glyoxylated polyacrylamide resins, starches, polyacrylamides, and other wet strength and dry strength additives commonly known to those skilled in the art.


Procedures for making PAE resins are well known in the literature and are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 3,772,076, which is incorporated herein by reference. PAE resins are sold by Ashland, Inc., Wilmington, Del., under the trade name Kymene® and by Georgia Pacific, Inc., Atlanta, Ga., under the trade name Amres®. A typical procedure for synthesizing a PAE resin is as follows. A polyalkylene polyamine is reacted with an aliphatic dicarboxylic acid to form a polyamidoamine backbone. An example of a polyamidoamine is the reaction product of diethylenetriamine with an adipic acid or ester of a dicarboxylic acid derivative. The resulting polyamidoamine is then reacted with epichlorohydrin in aqueous solution. The resulting product is diluted and neutralized with a strong mineral acid to a pH below 3.0.


Acrylamide polymers modified with glyoxal are known as glyoxalated polyacrylamide resins. Procedures for synthesizing glyoxylated polyacrylamide are well known in the literature and are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 3,556,932, which is incorporated herein by reference. Glyoxylated polyacrylamide resins are sold by Kemira, Inc., Kennesaw, Georgia, under the trade name Parez®. The acrylamide polymer may contain monomers to modify ionic properties. The acrylamide base polymer is reacted with sufficient glyoxal under aqueous alkaline conditions until a slight increase in viscosity occurs. The resulting product is then quenched with acid. Approximately half of the added glyoxyal remains unreacted and dissolved in the water. It is also possible to pre-blend the acrylamide polymer and glyoxal in a dry particulate state and subsequently add this blend to warm water to form a glyoxalated polyacrylamide resin.


Dry strength additives include materials such as starches that may be cationic, quaternary or nonionic in nature. Examples of dry strength additives suitable for use in the present invention include cationic derivatives of polysaccharides (such as starch, guar, cellulose, and chitin); polyamine; polyethyleneimine; vinylalcohol-vinylamine copolymers; cationic acrylic homo- and copolymers such as polyacrylamide, polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride and copolymers of acrylic acid, acrylic esters and acrylamide with diallyldimethylammonium chloride, acryloyloxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride, methacryloyloxyethyltrimethylammonium methylsulfate, methacryloyloxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride and methacrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium chloride.


Other cationic strength resins that may be used in the present invention are: aminopolyamide-epi resins (e.g. Kymene® 557H-resin); polyamine-epi resins (e.g. Kymene® 736 resin), epoxide resins (e.g. Kymene® 450 and Kymene® 2064 resins); polyethylenimine, ureaformaldehyde resins; melamine-formaldehyde resins; glyoxalated polyacrylamides (e.g. Hercobond® 1000 resin, Parez 631NC); polyisocyanates; and reactive starches (oxidized starch, dialdehyde starch, blocked reactive group starch).


The amount of cationic strength additive is generally from about 0.25 to about 3.00 weight % on a dry basis, based on the weight of the dried paper. For example in some embodiments of the present invention the amount of cationic strength additive is from about 0.25-3.00 weight percent, 0.25-2.00 weight percent, or 0.25-1.50 weight percent. In other embodiments, the cationic strength additive may be about 2 weight % on a dry basis, based on the weight of the dried paper, or about 1 weight %, or about 0.5 weight %. In one embodiment of the present invention similar amounts of wet strength additive and sulfopolyester are used.


Sulfopolyester Thermoplastic Resins


The sulfopolyesters of the present invention comprisedicarboxylic acid monomer residues, sulfomonomer residues, diol monomer residues, and repeating units. The sulfomonomer may be a dicarboxylic acid, a diol, or hydroxycarboxylic acid. Thus, the term “monomer residue”, as used herein, means a residue of a dicarboxylic acid, a diol, or a hydroxycarboxylic acid. A “repeating unit”, as used herein, means an organic structure having 2 monomer residues bonded through a carbonyloxy group. The sulfopolyesters of the present invention contain substantially equal molar proportions of acid residues (100 mole %) and diol residues (100 mole %) which react in substantially equal proportions such that the total moles of repeating units is equal to 100 mole %. The mole percentages provided in the present disclosure, therefore, may be based on the total moles of acid residues, the total moles of diol residues, or the total moles of repeating units. For example, a sulfopolyeseter containing 30 mole % of a sulfomonomer, which may be a dicarboxylic acid, a diol, or hydroxycarboxylic acid, based on the total repeating units, means that the sulfopolyester contains 30 mole % sulfomonomer out of a total of 100 mole % repeating units. Thus, there are 30 moles of sulfomonomer residues among every 100 moles of repeating units. Similarly, a sulfopolyeseter containing 30 mole % of a dicarboxylic acid sulfomonomer, based on the total acid residues, means the sulfopolyester contains 30 mole % sulfomonomer out of a total of 100 mole % acid residues. Thus, in this latter case, there are 30 moles of sulfomonomer residues among every 100 moles of acid residues.


The sulfopolyesters described herein have an inherent viscosity, abbreviated hereinafter as “Ih.V.”, of at least about 0.1 dL/g, preferably about 0.2 to 0.3 dL/g, and most preferably greater than about 0.3 dL/g, measured in a 60/40 parts by weight solution of phenol/tetrachloroethane solvent at 25.degree. C. and at a concentration of about 0.5 g of sulfopolyester in 100 mL of solvent. The term “polyester”, as used herein, encompasses both “homopolyesters” and “copolyesters” and means a synthetic polymer prepared by the polycondensation of difunctional carboxylic acids with difunctional hydroxyl compound. As used herein, the term “sulfopolyester” means any polyester comprising a sulfomonomer. Typically the difunctional carboxylic acid is a dicarboxylic acid and the difunctional hydroxyl compound is a dihydric alcohol such as, for example glycols and diols. Alternatively, the difunctional carboxylic acid may be a hydroxy carboxylic acid such as, for example, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and the difunctional hydroxyl compound may be a aromatic nucleus bearing 2 hydroxy substituents such as, for example, hydroquinone. The term “residue”, as used herein, means any organic structure incorporated into the polymer through a polycondensation reaction involving the corresponding monomer. Thus, the dicarboxylic acid residue may be derived from a dicarboxylic acid monomer or its associated acid halides, esters, salts, anhydrides, or mixtures thereof. As used herein, therefore, the term dicarboxylic acid is intended to include dicarboxylic acids and any derivative of a dicarboxylic acid, including its associated acid halides, esters, half-esters, salts, half-salts, anhydrides, mixed anhydrides, or mixtures thereof, useful in a polycondensation process with a diol to make a high molecular weight polyester.


The sulfopolyester of the present invention includes one or more dicarboxylic acid residues. Depending on the type and concentration of the sulfomonomer, the dicarboxylic acid residue may comprise from about 60 to about 100 mole % of the acid residues. Other examples of concentration ranges of dicarboxylic acid residues are from about 60 mole % to about 95 mole %, and about 70 mole % to about 95 mole %. Examples of dicarboxylic acids that may be used include aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, alicyclic dicarboxylic acids, aromatic dicarboxylic acids, or mixtures of two or more of these acids. Thus, suitable dicarboxylic acids include, but are not limited to succinic; glutaric; adipic; azelaic; sebacic; fumaric; maleic; itaconic; 1,3-cyclohexanedicarboxylic; 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic; diglycolic; 2,5-norbornanedicarboxylic; phthalic; terephthalic; 1,4-naphthalenedicarboxylic; 2,5-naphthalenedicarboxylic; diphenic; 4,4′-oxydibenzoic; 4,4′-sulfonyldibenzoic; and isophthalic. The preferred dicarboxylic acid residues are isophthalic, terephthalic, and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acids, or if diesters are used, dimethyl terephthalate, dimethyl isophthalate, and dimethyl-1,4-cyclohexane-dicarboxylate with the residues of isophthalic and terephthalic acid being especially preferred. Although the dicarboxylic acid methyl ester is the most preferred embodiment, it is also acceptable to include higher order alkyl esters, such as ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, and so forth. In addition, aromatic esters, particularly phenyl, also may be employed.


The sulfopolyester includes about 4 to about 40 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer having 2 functional groups and one or more sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof. Additional examples of concentration ranges for the sulfomonomer residues are about 4 to about 35 mole %, about 8 to about 30 mole %, and about 8 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units. The sulfomonomer may be a dicarboxylic acid or ester thereof containing a sulfonate group, a diol containing a sulfonate group, or a hydroxy acid containing a sulfonate group. The term “sulfonate” refers to a salt of a sulfonic acid having the structure “—SO.sub.3M” wherein M is the cation of the sulfonate salt. The cation of the sulfonate salt may be a metal ion such as Li.sup.+, Na.sup.+, K.sup.+, Mg.sup.++, Ca.sup.++, Ni.sup.++, Fe.sup.++, and the like. Alternatively, the cation of the sulfonate salt may be non-metallic such as a nitrogenous base as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,304,901. Nitrogen-based cations are derived from nitrogen-containing bases, which may be aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, or aromatic compounds. Examples of such nitrogen containing bases include ammonia, dimethylethanolamine, diethanolamine, triethanolamine, pyridine, morpholine, and piperidine. Because monomers containing the nitrogen-based sulfonate salts typically are not thermally stable at conditions required to make the polymers in the melt, the method of this invention for preparing sulfopolyesters containing nitrogen-based sulfonate salt groups is to disperse, dissipate, or dissolve the polymer containing the required amount of sulfonate group in the form of its alkali metal salt in water and then exchange the alkali metal cation for a nitrogen-based cation.


When a monovalent alkali metal ion is used as the cation of the sulfonate salt, the resulting sulfopolyester is completely dispersible in water with the rate of dispersion dependent on the content of sulfomonomer in the polymer, temperature of the water, surface area/thickness of the sulfopolyester, and so forth. When a divalent metal ion is used, the resulting sulfopolyesters are not readily dispersed by cold water but are more easily dispersed by hot water. Utilization of more than one counterion within a single polymer composition is possible and may offer a means to tailor or fine-tune the water-responsivity of the resulting article of manufacture. Examples sulfomonomers residues include monomer residues where the sulfonate salt group is attached to an aromatic acid nucleus, such as, for example, benzene; naphthalene; diphenyl; oxydiphenyl; sulfonyldiphenyl; and methylenediphenyl or cycloaliphatic rings, such as, for example, cyclohexyl; cyclopentyl; cyclobutyl; cycloheptyl; and cyclooctyl. Other examples of sulfomonomer residues which may be used in the present invention are the metal sulfonate salt of sulfophthalic acid, sulfoterephthalic acid, sulfoisophthalic acid, or combinations thereof. Other examples of sulfomonomers which may be used are 5-sodiosulfoisophthalic acid and esters thereof. If the sulfomonomer residue is from 5-sodiosulfoisophthalic acid, typical sulfomonomer concentration ranges are about 0.4 to about 35 mole %, about 8 to about 30 mole %, and about 8 to 25 mole %, based on the total moles of acid residues.


The sulfomonomers used in the preparation of the sulfopolyesters are known compounds and may be prepared using methods well known in the art. For example, sulfomonomers in which the sulfonate group is attached to an aromatic ring may be prepared by sulfonating the aromatic compound with oleum to obtain the corresponding sulfonic acid and followed by reaction with a metal oxide or base, for example, sodium acetate, to prepare the sulfonate salt. Procedures for preparation of various sulfomonomers are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,779,993; 3,018,272; and 3,528,947.


It is also possible to prepare the polyester using, for example, a sodium sulfonate salt, and ion-exchange methods to replace the sodium with a different ion, such as zinc, when the polymer is in the dispersed form. This type of ion exchange procedure is generally superior to preparing the polymer with divalent salts insofar as the sodium salts are usually more soluble in the polymer reactant melt-phase.


The sulfopolyester includes one or more diol residues which may include aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, and aralkyl glycols. The cycloaliphatic diols, for example, 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, may be present as their pure cis or trans isomers or as a mixture of cis and trans isomers. As used herein, the term “diol” is synonymous with the term “glycol” and means any dihydric alcohol. Examples diols include ethylene glycol; diethylene glycol; triethylene glycol; polyethylene glycols; 1,3-propanediol; 2,4-dimethyl-2-ethylhexane-1,3-diol; 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol; 2-ethyl-2-butyl-1,3-propanediol; 2-ethyl-2-isobutyl-1,3-propanediol; 1,3-butanediol; 1,4-butanediol; 1,5-pentanediol; 1,6-hexanediol; 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexanediol; thiodiethanol; 1,2-cyclohexanedimethanol; 1,3-cyclohexanedimethanol; 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol; 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-1,3-cyclobutanediol; p-xylylenediol, or combinations of one or more of these glycols.


The diol residues may include from about 25 mole % to about 100 mole %, based on the total diol residues, of residue of a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure H—(OCH.sub.2-CH.sub.2).sub.n-OH wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500. Non-limiting examples of lower molecular weight polyethylene glycols, e.g., wherein n is from 2 to 6, are diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, and tetraethylene glycol. Of these lower molecular weight glycols, diethylene and triethylene glycol are most preferred. Higher molecular weight polyethylene glycols (abbreviated herein as “PEG”), wherein n is from 7 to about 500, include the commercially available products known under the designation CARBOWAX®, a product of Dow Chemical Company (formerly Union Carbide). Typically, PEG's are used in combination with other diols such as, for example, diethylene glycol or ethylene glycol. Based on the values of n, which range from greater than 6 to 500, the molecular weight may range from greater than 300 to about 22,000 g/mol. The molecular weight and the mole % are inversely proportional to each other; specifically, as the molecular weight is increased, the mole % will be decreased in order to achieve a designated degree of hydrophilicity. For example, it is illustrative of this concept to consider that a PEG having a molecular weight of 1000 may constitute up to 10 mole % of the total diol, while a PEG having a molecular weight of 10,000 would typically be incorporated at a level of less than 1 mole % of the total diol.


Certain dimer, trimer, and tetramer diols may be formed in situ due to side reactions that may be controlled by varying the process conditions. For example, varying amounts of diethylene, triethylene, and tetraethylene glycols may be formed from ethylene glycol from an acid-catalyzed dehydration reaction which occurs readily when the polycondensation reaction is carried out under acidic conditions. The presence of buffer solutions, well-known to those skilled in the art, may be added to the reaction mixture to retard these side reactions. Additional compositional latitude is possible, however, if the buffer is omitted and the dimerization, trimerization, and tetramerization reactions are allowed to proceed.


The sulfopolyester of the present invention may include from 0 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof. Non-limiting examples of branching monomers are 1,1,1-trimethylol propane, 1,1,1-trimethylolethane, glycerin, pentaerythritol, erythritol, threitol, dipentaerythritol, sorbitol, trimellitic anhydride, pyromellitic dianhydride, dimethylol propionic acid, or combinations thereof. Further examples of branching monomer concentration ranges are from 0 to about 20 mole % and from 0 to about 10 mole %. The presence of a branching monomer may result in a number of possible benefits to the sulfopolyester of the present invention, including but not limited to, the ability to tailor rheological, solubility, and tensile properties. For example, at a constant molecular weight, a branched sulfopolyester, compared to a linear analog, will also have a greater concentration of end groups that may facilitate post-polymerization crosslinking reactions. At high concentrations of branching agent, however, the sulfopolyester may be prone to gelation.


The sulfopolyesters of the present invention has a glass transition temperature, abbreviated herein as “Tg”, of at least 25.degree. C. as measured on the dry polymer using standard techniques, such as differentical scanning calorimetry (“DSC”), well known to persons skilled in the art. The Tg measurements of the sulfopolyesters of the present invention are conducted using a “dry polymer”, that is, a polymer sample in which adventitious or absorbed water is driven off by heating to polymer to a temperature of about 200.degree. C. and allowing the sample to return to room temperature. Typically, the sulfopolyester is dried in the DSC apparatus by conducting a first thermal scan in which the sample is heated to a temperature above the water vaporization temperature, holding the sample at that temperature until the vaporization of the water absorbed in the polymer is complete (as indicated by an a large, broad endotherm), cooling the sample to room temperature, and then conducting a second thermal scan to obtain the Tg measurement. Further examples of glass transition temperatures exhibited by the sulfopolyester are at least 30.degree. C., at least 35.degree. C., at least 40.degree. C., at least 50.degree. C., at least 60.degree. C., at least 65.degree. C., at least 80.degree. C., and at least 90.degree. C. Although other Tg's are possible, typical glass transition temperatures of the dry sulfopolyesters our invention are about 30.degree. C., about 48.degree. C., about 55.degree. C., about 65.degree. C., about 70.degree. C., about 75.degree. C., about 85.degree. C., and about 90.degree. C.


Our invention also provides sulfopolyesters which comprise: (i) about 50 to about 96 mole % of one or more residues of isophthalic acid or terephthalic acid, based on the total acid residues; (ii) about 4 to about 30 mole %, based on the total acid residues, of a residue of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid; (iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure H—(OCH.sub.2-CH.sub.2).sub.n-OH wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; (iv) 0 to about 20 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof.


The sulfopolyester may contain other concentrations of isophthalic acid residues, for example, about 60 to about 95 mole %, and about 75 to about 95 mole %. Further examples of isophthalic acid residue concentrations ranges are about 70 to about 85 mole %, about 85 to about 95 mole % and about 90 to about 95 mole %. The sulfopolyester also may comprise about 25 to about 95 mole % of the residues of diethylene glycol. Further examples of diethylene glycol residue concentration ranges include about 50 to about 95 mole %, about 70 to about 95 mole %, and about 75 to about 95 mole %. The sulfopolyester also may include the residues of ethylene glycol and/or 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, abbreviated herein as “CHDM”. Typical concentration ranges of CHDM residues are about 10 to about 75 mole %, about 25 to about 65 mole %, and about 40 to about 60 mole %. Typical concentration ranges of ethylene glycol residues are are about 10 to about 75 mole %, about 25 to about 65 mole %, and about 40 to about 60 mole %. In another embodiment, the sulfopolyester comprises is about 75 to about 96 mole % of the residues of isophthalic acid and about 25 to about 95 mole % of the residues of diethylene glycol.


The sulfopolyesters of the present invention are readily prepared from the appropriate dicarboxylic acids, esters, anhydrides, or salts, sulfomonomer, and the appropriate diol or diol mixtures using typical polycondensation reaction conditions. They may be made by continuous, semi-continuous, and batch modes of operation and may utilize a variety of reactor types. Examples of suitable reactor types include, but are not limited to, stirred tank, continuous stirred tank, slurry, tubular, wiped-film, falling film, or extrusion reactors. The term “continuous” as used herein means a process wherein reactants are introduced and products withdrawn simultaneously in an uninterrupted manner. By “continuous” it is meant that the process is substantially or completely continuous in operation and is to be contrasted with a “batch” process. “Continuous” is not meant in any way to prohibit normal interruptions in the continuity of the process due to, for example, start-up, reactor maintenance, or scheduled shut down periods. The term “batch” process as used herein means a process wherein all the reactants are added to the reactor and then processed according to a predetermined course of reaction during which no material is fed or removed into the reactor. The term “semicontinuous” means a process where some of the reactants are charged at the beginning of the process and the remaining reactants are fed continuously as the reaction progresses.


Alternatively, a semicontinuous process may also include a process similar to a batch process in which all the reactants are added at the beginning of the process except that one or more of the products are removed continuously as the reaction progresses. The process is operated advantageously as a continuous process for economic reasons and to produce superior coloration of the polymer as the sulfopolyester may deteriorate in appearance if allowed to reside in a reactor at an elevated temperature for too long a duration.


The sulfopolyesters of the present invention are prepared by procedures known to persons skilled in the art. The sulfomonomer is most often added directly to the reaction mixture from which the polymer is made, although other processes are known and may also be employed, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,018,272, 3,075,952, and 3,033,822. The reaction of the sulfomonomer, diol component and the dicarboxylic acid component may be carried out using conventional polyester polymerization conditions. For example, when preparing the sulfopolyesters by means of an ester interchange reaction, i.e., from the ester form of the dicarboxylic acid components, the reaction process may comprise two steps. In the first step, the diol component and the dicarboxylic acid component, such as, for example, dimethyl isophthalate, are reacted at elevated temperatures, typically, about 150.degree. C. to about 250.degree. C. for about 0.5 to about 8 hours at pressures ranging from about 0.0 kPa gauge to about 414 kPa gauge (60 pounds per square inch, “psig”). Preferably, the temperature for the ester interchange reaction ranges from about 180.degree. C. to about 230.degree. C. for about 1 to about 4 hours while the preferred pressure ranges from about 103 kPa gauge (15 psig) to about 276 kPa gauge (40 psig). Thereafter, the reaction product is heated under higher temperatures and under reduced pressure to form sulfopolyester with the elimination of diol, which is readily volatilized under these conditions and removed from the system. This second step, or polycondensation step, is continued under higher vacuum and a temperature which generally ranges from about 230.degree. C. to about 350.degree. C., preferably about 250.degree. C. to about 310.degree. C. and most preferably about 260.degree. C. to about 290.degree. C. for about 0.1 to about 6 hours, or preferably, for about 0.2 to about 2 hours, until a polymer having the desired degree of polymerization, as determined by inherent viscosity, is obtained. The polycondensation step may be conducted under reduced pressure which ranges from about 53 kPa (400 torr) to about 0.013 kPa (0.1 torr). Stirring or appropriate conditions are used in both stages to ensure adequate heat transfer and surface renewal of the reaction mixture. The reactions of both stages are facilitated by appropriate catalysts such as, for example, alkoxy titanium compounds, alkali metal hydroxides and alcoholates, salts of organic carboxylic acids, alkyl tin compounds, metal oxides, and the like. A three-stage manufacturing procedure, similar to that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,290,631, may also be used, particularly when a mixed monomer feed of acids and esters is employed.


To ensure that the reaction of the diol component and dicarboxylic acid component by an ester interchange reaction mechanism is driven to completion, it is preferred to employ about 1.05 to about 2.5 moles of diol component to one mole dicarboxylic acid component. Persons of skill in the art will understand, however, that the ratio of diol component to dicarboxylic acid component is generally determined by the design of the reactor in which the reaction process occurs.


In the preparation of sulfopolyester by direct esterification, i.e., from the acid form of the dicarboxylic acid component, sulfopolyesters are produced by reacting the dicarboxylic acid or a mixture of dicarboxylic acids with the diol component or a mixture of diol components. The reaction is conducted at a pressure of from about 7 kPa gauge (1 psig) to about 1379 kPa gauge (200 psig), preferably less than 689 kPa (100 psig) to produce a low molecular weight, linear or branched sulfopolyester product having an average degree of polymerization of from about 1.4 to about 10. The temperatures employed during the direct esterification reaction typically range from about 180.degree. C. to about 280.degree. C., more preferably ranging from about 220.degree. C. to about 270.degree. C. This low molecular weight polymer may then be polymerized by a polycondensation reaction.


The amount of thermoplastic sulfopolyester resin is generally from about 0.25 to about 3.00 weight % on a dry basis, based on the weight of the dried paper. For example in one embodiment the amount of sulfopolyester is from about 0.25-3.00 weight percent, 0.25-2.00 weight percent, or 0.25-1.50 weight percent. In another embodiment the amount of thermoplastic sulfopolyester can be about 0.05 weight % on a dry basis, or about 0.1 weight % or about 0.2 weight %. Typically the ratio of thermoplastic sulfopolyester resin to cationic strength additive is about 5:1 to about 1:5. In one embodiment the ratio of f sulfopolyester to cationic strength additive is about 1:1.


The Repulping Process


The repulping process may be carried out using any conventional method. Typically, the process of repulping the paper to obtain recycled pulp fibers can be carried out by any mechanical action that disperses dry pulp fibers into an aqueous pulp fiber suspension. Conditions for repulping, as well as equipment commercially used, are discussed in “Handbook for Pulp & Paper Technologists, Second Edition” by G. A. Smook, Angus Wilde Publications, 1992, pp 194-195 and 211-212, which reference is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


It was found that paper prepared by the process of the present invention can be repulped in substantially less time than is required to repulp the same paper at about the same level of wet-strength.


The paper products of the present invention are suitable for use in the following areas: paper towels; napkins; facial tissue; liquid packaging board (milk carton, juice carton); poultry boxes; produce boxes; carrierboard; butchers wrap; bleached bag; poster board; table cloth; wallboard tape; currency paper; map paper; tea bag; corrugating medium; paper plates; molded products (egg cartons); laminating grades; flooring felt; coffee filter; bread wrap; multiwall bag; shingle wrap, etc.


The recycled pulp fibers prepared by the repulping process of the present invention can be used to make paper by conventional paper making processes, which comprise providing an aqueous suspension of the recycled pulp fibers and then sheeting and drying the aqueous suspension to obtain paper.


The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.


This invention can be further illustrated by the following examples of potential embodiments thereof, although it will be understood that these examples are included merely for the purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention unless otherwise specifically indicated. Parts and percentages mean parts by weight and percentages by weight, unless otherwise specified.


EXAMPLES

The examples were conducted using EastONE S85030 sulfopolyester dispersion to determine the effect of its addition on wet strength, dry strength and repulpability of paper in comparison to commercially available additives such as Kymene® and Hercobond® products from Hercules Incorporated, Wilmington, Del.


Preparation of Sulfopolyester and Polyamide Epichlorohydrin (PAE) Solutions:


A 3 wt % solution of a sulfopolyester was prepared as follows. 500 grams of distilled water was placed into a beaker heated to approximately 88.degrees. C. on a hot plate. 15.5 grams of sulfopolyester pellets were added and continually stirred while maintaining a temperature of 88.degrees. C. F for 10-15 minutes or until all of the sulfopolyester had dissolved. The mixture was cooled and distilled water was added to achieve a total solution weight of 515.5 grams.


A 3 wt % solution of a PAE solution was prepared as follows. 500 grams of distilled water was placed into a beaker. 160 grams of a 12.5 wt % solution of a commercially available PAE solution was added to the beaker and stirred.


Coating Procedure:


Each of the 3 wt % solutions was diluted, respectively, using distilled water such that when 3 ml of the solution was applied to the paper sheet, the target add-on concentration of 0.5 wt % was achieved.


3 drops of food coloring were added to each of the solutions as a visual aid to ensure uniform coverage of the solutions on the paper. An 8½″×11″ sheet of Lydall paper was placed on top of a larger piece of release paper. Lydall 18-½# Manning 514 saturating paper sheets weighing 1.87±0.01 grams were used. The release paper was parchment paper laminated to aluminum foil.


A control was prepared as follows. 5 ml of distilled water was added to the paper sheet using a 5 ml volumetric pipette. The water was gently rolled into the sheet using a 2 inch rubber hand roller. The paper sheet, with the release sheet attached, was dried for 5 minutes in a 93.degree. C. convection oven. The dried sheet was stored for 4 days under a 2 pound flat weight. This sample is referred to as the Control.


A sample containing 0.5 wt % PAE resin was prepared as follows. 5 ml of distilled water was added to the paper sheet using a 5 ml volumetric pipette. The water was gently rolled into the sheet using a hand roller. 3 ml of the diluted PAE solution was added with a 3 ml syringe to the pre-wetted paper. The solution was gently rolled into the sheet using a hand roller until uniform color was achieved. The paper sheet, with the release sheet attached, was dried for 5 minutes in a 93.degree. C. convection oven. The dried sheet was stored for 4 days under a 2 pound flat weight. This sample is referred to as Sample 1.


A sample containing 0.5 wt % sulfopolyester resin was prepared as follows. 5 ml of distilled water was added to the paper sheet using a 5 ml volumetric pipette. The water was gently rolled into the sheet using a hand roller. 3 ml of the diluted sulfopolyester solution was added with a 3 ml syringe to the pre-wetted paper. The solution was gently rolled into the sheet using a hand roller until uniform color was achieved. The paper sheet, with the release sheet attached, was dried for 5 minutes in a 93.degree. C. convection oven. The dried sheet was stored for 4 days under a 2 pound flat weight. This sample is referred to as Sample 2.


An example of the present invention containing 0.25 wt % PAE and 0.25 wt % sulfopolyester was prepared as follows. 5 ml of distilled water was added to the paper sheet using a 5 ml volumetric pipette. The water was gently rolled into the sheet using a hand roller. 3 ml of the diluted PAE solution was added with a 3 ml syringe to the pre-wetted paper. The solution was gently rolled into the sheet using a hand roller until uniform color was achieved. The sheet was allowed to sit for 2 minutes. 3 ml of the diluted sulfopolyester solution was subsequently added to the paper with a 3 ml syringe. The sulfopolyester solution was gently hand rolled into the paper. The paper sheet, with the release sheet attached, was dried for 5 minutes in a 93.degree. C. convection oven. The dried sheet was stored for 4 days under a 2 pound flat weight. This sample is referred to as Sample 3.


The control and Samples 1, 2 and 3 were evaluated for dry strength and wet strength using the following TAPPI test methods:

    • T494-om-88: Tensile Breaking Properties of Paper and Paperboard (Using Constant Rate of Elongation Apparatus)
    • T456-om-87: Tensile Breaking Strength of Water-Saturated Paper and Paperboard (“Wet Tensile Strength”)


The repulpability of the paper samples was determined as follows. A brass hydropulper manufactured by Hermann Manufacturing Company was used for testing. The hydropulper was a 2 liter vessel with a 3000 rpm, ¾ horsepower tri-rotor. The hydropulper had a diameter of 6 inches and a height of 10 inches.


Samples were cut into two 1 inch squares. A 2 liter sample of water was maintained at 20.degrees. C. and poured into the hydropulper. The counter was set to zero and both samples were placed into the hydropulper. The samples were pulped at intervals of 500 revolutions. After each of the 500 revolutions, the hydropulper was temporarily stopped and a fluorescent inspection light was held over the basin to determine whether or not the samples had been fully pulped. The number of sets per 500 revolutions was recorded. After 15,000 revolutions, samples were considered not repulpable and testing was discontinued. The test results are shown below in Table 1.









TABLE 1







Test results for control, Sample 1, Sample and Sample 3.











Dry Tensile
Wet Tensile
Repulpability



Strength
Strength
(Revolutions to



(g/15 mm)
(g/15 mm)
Repulp)













Control
3900
179
 500


0.5 wt % PAE
4200
408
15,000* 


(Sample 1)


0.5 wt % Sulfopolyester
4600
250
3500


(Sample 2)


0.25 wt % PAE + 0.25 wt
4100
469
6000


% Sulfopolyester


(Sample 3)





*Note: After 15,000 revolutions, the sample was considered not repulpable and testing was discontinued.





Claims
  • 1. A repulpable paper product comprising: papermaking fibers; a cationic strength additive; and a thermoplastic sulfopolyester resin, wherein the papermaking fibers are selected from woody fibers, softwood fibers, hardwood fibers, non-woody fibers, synthetic polymeric fibers, recycled fibers, glass fibers, or combinations thereof,wherein the synthetic polymeric fibers are greater than 50% of the total papermaking fiber,wherein said synthetic polymeric fibers have a mean fiber diameter of less than 5 microns.
  • 2. The repulpable paper products of claim 1 wherein the sulfopolyester resin comprises (i) residues of one or more dicarboxylic acids;(ii) about 4 to about 40 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer having 2 functional groups and one or more sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein said functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; and(iv) 0 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein said functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof.
  • 3. The repulpable paper products of claim 2 wherein the dicarboxylic acids are selected from aliphatic diacids, cycloaliphatic dicarboxylic acids, aromatic dicarboxylic acids, and combinations thereof.
  • 4. The repulpable paper products of claim 3 wherein the dicarboxylic acids are selected from succinic, glutaric, adipic, azelaic, sebacic, fumaric, maleic, itaconic, 1,3-cyclohexane dicarboxylic, 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic, diglycolic, 2,5-norbornanedicarboxylic, phthalic, terephthallc, 1,4-naphthalenedlcarboxylic, 2,5-naphthalenedicarboxylic, 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic, 2,7-naphthalenedicarboxylic, diphenic, 4,4′-oxydibenzoic, 4,4′-sulfonyldibenzoic, isophthalic, and combinations thereof.
  • 5. The repulpable paper products of claim 2 wherein the sulfomonomer is a metal sulfonate salt of a sulfophthalic acid, sulfoterephthalic acid, sulfoisophthalic acid, or combinations thereof.
  • 6. The repulpable paper products of claim 2 wherein the diol residues are selected from ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, poly(ethylene) glycols, 1,3-propanediol, 2,4-dimethyl-2-ethylhexane-1,3-diol, 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol, 2-ethyl-2-butyl-1,3-propanediol, 2-ethyl-2-isobutyl-1,3-propanediol, 1,3-butanedlol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexanediol, thiodiethanol, 1,2-cyclohexanedimethanol, 1,3-cyclohexanedimethanol, 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-1,3-cyclobutanediol, p-xylylenediol, and combinations thereof.
  • 7. The repulpable paper products of claim 2 wherein the branching monomer is 1,1,1-trimethylol propane, 1,1,1-trimethylolethane, glycerin, pentaerythritol, erythritol, threitol, dipentaerythritol, sorbitol, trimellitic anhydride, pyromellitic dianhydride, dimethylol propionic acid, or combinations thereof.
  • 8. The repulpable paper products of claim 1 wherein the cationic strength additive is selected from polyacrylamide resins, polyamide epihalohydrin resins, polyamine epihalohydrin resins, polyamidoamine epichalohydrin resins, polyalkyleneimine resins, urea-formaldehyde resins, melamine-formaldehyde resins, cationic polysaccharides or combinations thereof.
  • 9. The repulpable paper products of claim 8 wherein the cationic strength additive is selected from cationic glyoxylated polyacrylamide resins or polyamidoamine epichlorohydrin resins.
  • 10. The repulpable paper products according to claim 1 wherein the synthetic polymer fibers are greater than 70% of the total papermaking fiber.
  • 11. The repulpable paper products of claim 1 wherein the amount of cationic strength additive is about 0.25 weight % to about 3 weight % on a dry basis and the amount of thermoplastic sulfopolyester resin is about 0.25 to about 3.00 weight %, on a dry basis relative to the weight of the dried paper product.
  • 12. The repulpable paper products of claim 1 wherein the amount of cationic strength additive is about 0.25 weight % to about 2 weight % on a dry basis and the amount of thermoplastic sulfopolyester resin is about 0.25 to about 2 weight %, on a dry basis relative to the weight of the dried paper product.
  • 13. The repulpable paper product of claim 1 wherein the amounts of cationic strength additive is about 0.25 weight to about 1.5 weight % on a dry basis and the amount of thermoplastic sulfopolyester resin is about 0.25 to about 1.5 weight %, on a dry basis relative to the weight of the dried paper product.
  • 14. The repulpable paper products of claim 1 wherein the ratio of thermoplastic sulfopolyester resin to cationic strength additive is about 5:1 to about 1:5.
  • 15. The repulpable paper products of claim 1 wherein the ratio of sulfopolyester to cationic strength additive is about 1:1.
  • 16. A method of improving the wet-strength of cellulosic paper comprising adding a cationic strength additive and a sulfopolyester thermoplastic resin to papermaking fibers during the papermaking process; wherein the papermaking fibers are selected from woody fibers, softwood fibers, hardwood fibers, non-woody fibers, synthetic polymeric fibers, recycled fibers, glass fibers, or combinations thereof,wherein the synthetic polymeric fibers are greater than 50% of the total papermaking fiber,wherein said synthetic polymeric fibers have a mean fiber diameter of less than 5 microns, and wherein the paper comprises said papermaking fibers, said cationic strength additive and said sulfopolyester thermoplastic resin.
  • 17. The method of claim 16 wherein the cationic strength additive and sulfopolyester thermoplastic resin are added to an aqueous slurry of papermaking fibers during the papermaking process.
  • 18. The method of claim 16 wherein said cationic strength additive is added to an aqueous slurry of papermaking fibers and the sulfopolyester thermoplastic resin is applied onto a paper web resulting from the dewatering of said papermaking fibers.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the thermoplastic sulfopolyester resin is applied to the paper web by spray application.
  • 20. The method of claim 16 wherein the resulting paper products exhibit enhanced repulpability.
  • 21. A paper product comprising: papermaking fibers consisting of one or more of woody fibers, softwood fibers, hardwood fibers, non-woody fibers, synthetic polymeric fibers, recycled fibers, or glass fibers;cationic strength additives consisting of one or more of polyacrylamide resins, polyamide epihalohydrin resins, polyamine epihalohydrin resins, polyamidoamine epichalohydrin resins, polyalkyleneimine resins, urea-formaldehyde resins, melamine-formaldehyde resins, or cationic polysaccharides; andthermoplastic sulfopolyester resins comprising (i) residues of one or more dicarboxylic acids;(ii) about 4 to about 40 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer having 2 functional groups and one or more sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein said functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; and(iv) 0 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein said functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof,wherein the synthetic polymeric fibers are greater than 50% of the total papermaking fiber,wherein said synthetic polymeric fibers have a mean fiber diameter of less than 5 microns.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/172,257 filed Apr. 24, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (615)
Number Name Date Kind
1814155 Haughey Jul 1931 A
2862251 Kalwaites Dec 1958 A
2999788 Morgan Sep 1961 A
3018272 Griffing et al. Jan 1962 A
3033822 Kibler et al. May 1962 A
3049469 Davison et al. Aug 1962 A
3075952 Coover et al. Jan 1963 A
3372084 Hanns Mar 1968 A
3485706 Evans Dec 1969 A
3528947 Lappin et al. Sep 1970 A
3556932 Coscia et al. Jan 1971 A
3592796 Trapasso et al. Jul 1971 A
3772076 Keim Nov 1973 A
3779993 Kibler et al. Dec 1973 A
3783093 Gallacher et al. Jan 1974 A
3803210 Rod et al. Apr 1974 A
3833457 Misumi et al. Sep 1974 A
3846507 Thomm et al. Nov 1974 A
3998740 Bost et al. Dec 1976 A
4008344 Okamoto et al. Feb 1977 A
4073777 O'Neill et al. Feb 1978 A
4073988 Nishida et al. Feb 1978 A
4100324 Anderson et al. Jul 1978 A
4104262 Schade Aug 1978 A
4121966 Amano et al. Oct 1978 A
4127696 Okamoto Nov 1978 A
4137393 Sidebotham et al. Jan 1979 A
4145469 Newkirk et al. Mar 1979 A
4233355 Sato et al. Nov 1980 A
4234652 Vanoni et al. Nov 1980 A
4239720 Gerlach et al. Dec 1980 A
4240918 Lagasse et al. Dec 1980 A
4243480 Hernandez et al. Jan 1981 A
4288503 Goldberg Sep 1981 A
4297412 Achard et al. Oct 1981 A
4299654 Tlach et al. Nov 1981 A
4302495 Marra Nov 1981 A
4304901 O'Neill et al. Dec 1981 A
4342801 Gerlach et al. Aug 1982 A
4350006 Okamoto et al. Sep 1982 A
4365041 Okamoto et al. Dec 1982 A
4381335 Okamoto Apr 1983 A
4410579 Johns Oct 1983 A
4427557 Stockburger Jan 1984 A
4460649 Park et al. Jul 1984 A
4480085 Larson Oct 1984 A
4496619 Okamoto Jan 1985 A
4517715 Yoshida et al. May 1985 A
4569343 Kimura et al. Feb 1986 A
4618524 Groitzsch et al. Oct 1986 A
4647497 Weeks Mar 1987 A
4699845 Oikawa et al. Oct 1987 A
4738785 Langston et al. Apr 1988 A
4755421 Manning et al. Jul 1988 A
4795668 Krueger et al. Jan 1989 A
4804719 Weaver et al. Feb 1989 A
4810775 Bendix et al. Mar 1989 A
4863785 Berman et al. Sep 1989 A
4873273 Allan et al. Oct 1989 A
4910292 Blount Mar 1990 A
4921899 Phan et al. May 1990 A
4940744 Tortorici et al. Jul 1990 A
4943477 Kanamura et al. Jul 1990 A
4946932 Jenkins Aug 1990 A
4966808 Kawano Oct 1990 A
4973656 Blount Nov 1990 A
4990593 Blount Feb 1991 A
4996252 Phan et al. Feb 1991 A
5006598 Adams et al. Apr 1991 A
5039339 Phan et al. Aug 1991 A
5057368 Largman et al. Oct 1991 A
5069970 Largman et al. Dec 1991 A
5073436 Antonacci et al. Dec 1991 A
5108820 Kaneko et al. Apr 1992 A
5124194 Kawano Jun 1992 A
5158844 Hagens et al. Oct 1992 A
5162074 Hills Nov 1992 A
5162399 Sharma et al. Nov 1992 A
5171767 Buckley et al. Dec 1992 A
5176952 Joseph et al. Jan 1993 A
5218042 Kuo et al. Jun 1993 A
5242640 Butler et al. Sep 1993 A
5258220 Joseph Nov 1993 A
5262460 Suzuki et al. Nov 1993 A
5274025 Stockl et al. Dec 1993 A
5277976 Hogle et al. Jan 1994 A
5281306 Kakiuchi et al. Jan 1994 A
5286843 Wood Feb 1994 A
5290626 Nishioi et al. Mar 1994 A
5290631 Fleury et al. Mar 1994 A
5290654 Sacripante et al. Mar 1994 A
5292581 Viazmensky et al. Mar 1994 A
5292855 Krutak et al. Mar 1994 A
5296286 Allen et al. Mar 1994 A
5308697 Muramoto et al. May 1994 A
5336552 Strack et al. Aug 1994 A
5338406 Smith Aug 1994 A
5342863 Buckley et al. Aug 1994 A
5366804 Dugan Nov 1994 A
5368928 Okamura et al. Nov 1994 A
5369210 George et al. Nov 1994 A
5369211 George et al. Nov 1994 A
5374357 Comstock et al. Dec 1994 A
5375306 Roussin-Moynier Dec 1994 A
5378757 Blount, Jr. et al. Jan 1995 A
5382400 Pike et al. Jan 1995 A
5386003 Greene et al. Jan 1995 A
5389068 Keck Feb 1995 A
5395693 Cho et al. Mar 1995 A
5405698 Dugan Apr 1995 A
5416156 Kamen May 1995 A
5423432 Krutak et al. Jun 1995 A
5431994 Kozulla Jul 1995 A
5446079 Buchanan et al. Aug 1995 A
5456982 Hansen et al. Oct 1995 A
5466410 Hills Nov 1995 A
5466518 Isaac et al. Nov 1995 A
5472600 Ellefson et al. Dec 1995 A
5482772 Strack et al. Jan 1996 A
5486418 Ohmory et al. Jan 1996 A
5496627 Bagrodia et al. Mar 1996 A
5498468 Blaney Mar 1996 A
5502091 Dasgupta Mar 1996 A
5508101 Patnode et al. Apr 1996 A
5509913 Yeo Apr 1996 A
5525282 Dugan Jun 1996 A
5530059 Blount, Jr. et al. Jun 1996 A
5536811 Wood Jul 1996 A
5543488 Miller et al. Aug 1996 A
5545481 Harrington Aug 1996 A
5552495 Miller et al. Sep 1996 A
5559171 Buchanan et al. Sep 1996 A
5559205 Hansen et al. Sep 1996 A
5567510 Patnode et al. Oct 1996 A
5571620 George et al. Nov 1996 A
5575918 Virnig et al. Nov 1996 A
5580911 Buchanan et al. Dec 1996 A
5593778 Kondo et al. Jan 1997 A
5593807 Sacripante et al. Jan 1997 A
5599858 Buchanan et al. Feb 1997 A
5605746 Groeger et al. Feb 1997 A
5607491 Jackson et al. Mar 1997 A
5607765 Hansen et al. Mar 1997 A
5620785 Watt et al. Apr 1997 A
5630972 Patnode et al. May 1997 A
5635071 Al-Samadi Jun 1997 A
5637385 Mizuki et al. Jun 1997 A
5643662 Yeo et al. Jul 1997 A
5646237 George et al. Jul 1997 A
5652048 Haynes et al. Jul 1997 A
5654086 Nishijima et al. Aug 1997 A
5658704 Patel et al. Aug 1997 A
5660965 Mychajlowskij et al. Aug 1997 A
5672415 Sawyer et al. Sep 1997 A
5688582 Nagaoka et al. Nov 1997 A
5698331 Matsumura et al. Dec 1997 A
5709940 George et al. Jan 1998 A
5736083 Dugan Apr 1998 A
5750605 Blumenthal et al. May 1998 A
5753351 Yoshida et al. May 1998 A
5759926 Pike et al. Jun 1998 A
5763065 Patnode et al. Jun 1998 A
5779736 Frederick et al. Jul 1998 A
5783503 Gillespie et al. Jul 1998 A
5785725 Cusick et al. Jul 1998 A
5798078 Myers Aug 1998 A
5817740 Anderson et al. Oct 1998 A
5820982 Salsman Oct 1998 A
5837658 Stork Nov 1998 A
5843311 Richter et al. Dec 1998 A
5853701 George et al. Dec 1998 A
5853944 Foucher et al. Dec 1998 A
5871845 Dahringer et al. Feb 1999 A
5883181 Cicchiello et al. Mar 1999 A
5888916 Tadokoro et al. Mar 1999 A
5895710 Sasse et al. Apr 1999 A
5916678 Jackson et al. Jun 1999 A
5916687 Takanashi et al. Jun 1999 A
5916725 Patel et al. Jun 1999 A
5916935 Wiggins et al. Jun 1999 A
5935880 Wang et al. Aug 1999 A
5935883 Pike Aug 1999 A
5935884 Williams et al. Aug 1999 A
5948710 Pomplun et al. Sep 1999 A
5952251 Jackson et al. Sep 1999 A
5954967 Egraz et al. Sep 1999 A
5970583 Groten et al. Oct 1999 A
5976694 Tsai et al. Nov 1999 A
5993668 Duan Nov 1999 A
5993834 Shah et al. Nov 1999 A
6004673 Nishijima Dec 1999 A
6007910 Miller et al. Dec 1999 A
6020420 George Feb 2000 A
6037055 Aneja et al. Mar 2000 A
6057388 Wiggins et al. May 2000 A
6080471 Shigematsu et al. Jun 2000 A
6090731 Pike et al. Jul 2000 A
6110249 Medcalf et al. Aug 2000 A
6110588 Perez et al. Aug 2000 A
6110636 Foucher et al. Aug 2000 A
6114407 Myers Sep 2000 A
6121170 Tsai et al. Sep 2000 A
6162340 Zakikhani Dec 2000 A
6162890 George et al. Dec 2000 A
6168719 Shimokawa et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171685 George et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174602 Matsui et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177193 Tsai et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177607 Blaney et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183648 Kozak et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200669 Marmon et al. Mar 2001 B1
6211309 McIntosh et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218321 Lorcks et al. Apr 2001 B1
6225243 Austin May 2001 B1
6235392 Luo et al. May 2001 B1
6248809 Buckley et al. Jun 2001 B1
6294645 Allen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296933 Goda et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300306 Firkins et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316592 Bates et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322887 Matsui et al. Nov 2001 B1
6331606 Sun Dec 2001 B1
6332994 Karageorgiou Dec 2001 B1
6348679 Ryan et al. Feb 2002 B1
6352948 Pike et al. Mar 2002 B1
6355137 Staib Mar 2002 B1
6361784 Brennan et al. Mar 2002 B1
6365697 Kim et al. Apr 2002 B1
6369136 Sorriero et al. Apr 2002 B2
6381817 Moody, III May 2002 B1
6384108 Breton et al. May 2002 B1
6402870 Groten et al. Jun 2002 B1
6403677 Walker Jun 2002 B1
6417251 Brady Jul 2002 B1
6420024 Perez et al. Jul 2002 B1
6420027 Kimura et al. Jul 2002 B2
6428900 Wang Aug 2002 B1
6429253 Guerro et al. Aug 2002 B1
6430348 Asano et al. Aug 2002 B1
6432532 Perez et al. Aug 2002 B2
6432850 Takagi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436855 Iwata et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440556 Matsui et al. Aug 2002 B2
6441267 Dugan Aug 2002 B1
6471910 Haggard Oct 2002 B1
6488731 Schultheiss et al. Dec 2002 B2
6506853 Duan Jan 2003 B2
6509092 Dugan Jan 2003 B1
6512024 Thumma et al. Jan 2003 B1
6533938 Dilorio et al. Mar 2003 B1
6541175 Jiang et al. Apr 2003 B1
6548592 Lang et al. Apr 2003 B1
6550622 Koslow Apr 2003 B2
6551353 Baker et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552123 Katayama et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552162 Wang et al. Apr 2003 B1
6554881 Healey Apr 2003 B1
6573204 Philipp et al. Jun 2003 B1
6576716 Wo Jun 2003 B1
6579466 David et al. Jun 2003 B1
6583075 Dugan Jun 2003 B1
6586529 Mumick et al. Jul 2003 B2
6589426 Husain et al. Jul 2003 B1
6602955 Soerens et al. Aug 2003 B2
H2086 Amsler Oct 2003 H
6638677 Patel et al. Oct 2003 B2
6657017 Wo et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664437 Sawyer et al. Dec 2003 B2
6692825 Qin et al. Feb 2004 B2
6706652 Groten et al. Mar 2004 B2
6720063 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730387 Rezai et al. May 2004 B2
6743506 Bond et al. Jun 2004 B2
6746766 Bond et al. Jun 2004 B2
6746779 Hayes et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759124 Royer et al. Jul 2004 B2
6764802 Maric Jul 2004 B2
6767498 Talley, Jr. et al. Jul 2004 B1
6776858 Bansal et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780560 Farrugia et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780942 Leon et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787245 Hayes Sep 2004 B1
6815382 Groten et al. Nov 2004 B1
6838172 Yoon et al. Jan 2005 B2
6838403 Tsai et al. Jan 2005 B2
6841038 Horenziak et al. Jan 2005 B2
6844062 Matsui et al. Jan 2005 B2
6844063 Matsui et al. Jan 2005 B2
6849329 Perez et al. Feb 2005 B2
6855422 Magill et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860906 Malisz et al. Mar 2005 B2
6861142 Wilkie et al. Mar 2005 B1
6890649 Hobbs et al. May 2005 B2
6893711 Williamson et al. May 2005 B2
6900148 Yoneda et al. May 2005 B2
6902796 Morell et al. Jun 2005 B2
6946506 Bond et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949288 Hodge et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953622 Tsai et al. Oct 2005 B2
6989194 Bansal et al. Jan 2006 B2
7008485 Heikkila et al. Mar 2006 B2
7011653 Imsangjan et al. Mar 2006 B2
7011885 Chang et al. Mar 2006 B2
7014803 Perez et al. Mar 2006 B2
7022201 Anderson et al. Apr 2006 B2
7025885 Cote et al. Apr 2006 B2
7026033 Fujimori et al. Apr 2006 B2
7070695 Husain et al. Jul 2006 B2
7087301 Musgrave et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091140 Ferencz et al. Aug 2006 B1
7097904 Ochi et al. Aug 2006 B2
7144614 Nakajima et al. Dec 2006 B2
7160612 Magill et al. Jan 2007 B2
7163744 Nightingale et al. Jan 2007 B2
7166225 Pitt et al. Jan 2007 B2
7179376 Kaleem et al. Feb 2007 B2
7186343 Rabie et al. Mar 2007 B2
7186344 Hughes Mar 2007 B2
7193029 Hayes Mar 2007 B2
7194788 Clark et al. Mar 2007 B2
7195814 Ista et al. Mar 2007 B2
7214765 Ringeisen et al. May 2007 B2
7220815 Hayes May 2007 B2
7238415 Rodriguez et al. Jul 2007 B2
7238423 Calhoun et al. Jul 2007 B2
7241497 Magill et al. Jul 2007 B2
7276139 Katai et al. Oct 2007 B2
7285209 Yu et al. Oct 2007 B2
7291270 Gibson et al. Nov 2007 B2
7291389 Bitler et al. Nov 2007 B1
7304125 Ibar Dec 2007 B2
7306735 Baggott et al. Dec 2007 B2
7309372 Kahlbaugh et al. Dec 2007 B2
7314497 Kahlbaugh et al. Jan 2008 B2
7329723 Jernigan et al. Feb 2008 B2
7338664 Tseng et al. Mar 2008 B2
7344775 Stevens et al. Mar 2008 B2
7347947 Nakamura et al. Mar 2008 B2
7357985 Kurian et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358022 Farrugia et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358323 Maeda et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358325 Hayes Apr 2008 B2
7361700 Sunamori et al. Apr 2008 B2
7365118 McCleskey et al. Apr 2008 B2
7371701 Inagaki May 2008 B2
7387976 Baba et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388058 Kaku et al. Jun 2008 B2
7405171 Tsujiyama et al. Jul 2008 B2
7405266 Bentley et al. Jul 2008 B2
7432219 Strandqvist et al. Oct 2008 B2
7442277 Kupper et al. Oct 2008 B2
7462386 Yamasaki et al. Dec 2008 B2
7497895 Sabottke Mar 2009 B2
7513004 Luckman et al. Apr 2009 B2
7560159 Goda et al. Jul 2009 B2
7576019 Bond et al. Aug 2009 B2
7588688 Butters et al. Sep 2009 B2
7622188 Kamiyama et al. Nov 2009 B2
7635745 Gupta Dec 2009 B2
7655070 Dallas et al. Feb 2010 B1
7666500 Magill et al. Feb 2010 B2
7666502 Magill et al. Feb 2010 B2
7666504 Ochi et al. Feb 2010 B2
7674510 Kamiya Mar 2010 B2
7687143 Gupta et al. Mar 2010 B2
7695812 Peng et al. Apr 2010 B2
7696111 Mangold et al. Apr 2010 B2
7704595 Morin Apr 2010 B2
7718104 MacDonald et al. May 2010 B2
7727627 Sen et al. Jun 2010 B2
7732557 Phelps et al. Jun 2010 B2
7736737 Van Dun et al. Jun 2010 B2
7737060 Strickler et al. Jun 2010 B2
7744807 Berrigan et al. Jun 2010 B2
7754123 Verdegan et al. Jul 2010 B2
7757811 Fox et al. Jul 2010 B2
7765647 Smith et al. Aug 2010 B2
7772456 Zhang et al. Aug 2010 B2
7820568 Horiguchi et al. Oct 2010 B2
7837814 Minami et al. Nov 2010 B2
7858732 Bruchmann et al. Dec 2010 B2
7883604 Dyer et al. Feb 2011 B2
7884037 Sirovatka et al. Feb 2011 B2
7887526 Van Gompel et al. Feb 2011 B2
7892672 Nishikawa Feb 2011 B2
7892992 Kamada et al. Feb 2011 B2
7892993 Gupta et al. Feb 2011 B2
7896940 Sundet et al. Mar 2011 B2
7897078 Petersen et al. Mar 2011 B2
7897248 Barrera et al. Mar 2011 B2
7902094 Haile et al. Mar 2011 B2
7902096 Brandner et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910207 Kamiyama et al. Mar 2011 B2
7914866 Shannon et al. Mar 2011 B2
7918313 Gross et al. Apr 2011 B2
7919419 Hurley et al. Apr 2011 B2
7922959 Jones et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923143 Tanaka et al. Apr 2011 B2
7928025 Shipley et al. Apr 2011 B2
7931457 Johnson et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932192 Fujisawa et al. Apr 2011 B2
7935645 Pourdeyhimi et al. May 2011 B2
7947142 Fox et al. May 2011 B2
7947864 Damay et al. May 2011 B2
7951313 Matsubayashi et al. May 2011 B2
7951452 Nakayama et al. May 2011 B2
7959848 Reneker et al. Jun 2011 B2
8021457 Dema et al. Sep 2011 B2
8057567 Webb et al. Nov 2011 B2
8129019 Pourdeyhimi et al. Mar 2012 B2
20020009590 Matsui et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020030016 Schmidt Mar 2002 A1
20020079121 Ryan et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020106510 Deguchi et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123290 Tsai et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020127937 Lange et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020127939 Hwo et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020146552 Mumick et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020187329 Ista et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030026986 Matsui et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030057155 Husain et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030077444 Bond et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030091822 Bond et al. May 2003 A1
20030092343 Bond et al. May 2003 A1
20030104204 Bond et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030111763 Jen Jun 2003 A1
20030166370 Harris et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030166371 Fingal et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030168191 Hansen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030176132 Moriyasu et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030194558 Anderson Oct 2003 A1
20030196955 Hughes Oct 2003 A1
20040081829 Klier et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040157037 Yamaguchi et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040194558 Nagase Oct 2004 A1
20040209058 Chou et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040211729 Sunkara et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040242106 Rabasco et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040242838 Duan Dec 2004 A1
20040258910 Haile et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260034 Haile et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050026527 Schmidt Feb 2005 A1
20050027098 Hayes Feb 2005 A1
20050032450 Haggard et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050079781 Tsujimoto et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050115902 Kaleem et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050125908 Pourdeyhimi Jun 2005 A1
20050148261 Close et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171250 Hayes Aug 2005 A1
20050208300 Magill et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050221709 Jordan et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050222956 Bristow et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050227068 Dugan Oct 2005 A1
20050239359 Jones et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050282008 Haile et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050287895 Bansal Dec 2005 A1
20060011544 Sharma et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060019570 Groten et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060021938 Diallo Feb 2006 A1
20060030230 Nagaoka et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060035556 Yokoi et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060049386 Kody et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060051575 Yoon et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060057350 Ochi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060057373 Inagaki et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060060529 Cote et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060065600 Sunkara et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060081330 Minami et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060083917 Dugan Apr 2006 A1
20060093814 Chang May 2006 A1
20060093819 Atwood et al. May 2006 A1
20060113033 Bruner Jun 2006 A1
20060128247 Skoog et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060135020 Weinberg et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060147709 Mizumura et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155094 Meckel et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060159918 Dugan et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060177656 Kolmes et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060189956 Catalan Aug 2006 A1
20060194027 Pourdeyhimi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060194047 Gupta et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060204753 Simmonds et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060210797 Masuda et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060230731 Kalayci et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060234049 Van Dun et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060234050 Frankel Oct 2006 A1
20060234587 Horiguchi et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060263601 Wang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060281383 Schmitt et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070009736 Chuang et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070020453 Sen et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021021 Verdegan et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031637 Anderson Feb 2007 A1
20070031668 Hietpas et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070039889 Ashford Feb 2007 A1
20070048523 Pollet et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070056906 Kaleem et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070062872 Parker et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070074628 Jones et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070077427 Dugan Apr 2007 A1
20070098982 Nishida et al. May 2007 A1
20070102361 Kiefer et al. May 2007 A1
20070110980 Shah May 2007 A1
20070110998 Steele et al. May 2007 A1
20070114177 Sabottke May 2007 A1
20070122613 Stevens et al. May 2007 A1
20070122614 Peng et al. May 2007 A1
20070128404 Tung et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070167096 Scott Jul 2007 A1
20070179275 Gupta et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070182040 Suzuki et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070190319 Kalayci Aug 2007 A1
20070232179 Polat et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070232180 Polat et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070243377 Nishida et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070254153 Nadkarni et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070258935 McEntire et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070259029 McEntire et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070259177 Gupta et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070264520 Wood et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070278151 Musale Dec 2007 A1
20070278152 Musale Dec 2007 A1
20080000836 Wang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080003400 Tseng Jan 2008 A1
20080003905 Tseng Jan 2008 A1
20080003912 Pourdeyhimi et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080009574 Huenefeld et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080009650 Sluijmers et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080011680 Partridge et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080038974 Eagles Feb 2008 A1
20080039540 Reitz Feb 2008 A1
20080064285 Morton et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080134652 Lim et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080160278 Cheng et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080160856 Chen et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080160859 Gupta et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080170982 Zhang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080188151 Yokoi et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080207833 Bear et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080207883 Janjic et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080229672 Woo et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080233850 Woo et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080245037 Rogers et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080287026 Chakravarty et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080311815 Gupta et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090025895 Cowman Jan 2009 A1
20090036015 Nhan et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090042475 Pourdeyhimi et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090163449 Wempe Jun 2009 A1
20090249956 Chi et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090258182 Okamoto et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090274862 Nakayama et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090294435 Nhan et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090305592 Shi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100018660 Varnell Jan 2010 A1
20100035500 Kimura et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100072126 Tsujimoto et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100133173 Inagaki Jun 2010 A1
20100136312 Inagaki Jun 2010 A1
20100143717 Sakamoto et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100173154 Shimotsu et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100180558 Ito et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100187712 Gupta et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100197027 Zhang et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100200512 Chase et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100203788 Kimura et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100247894 Beard Sep 2010 A1
20100272938 Mitchell et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100273947 Miyauchi et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100282682 Eaton et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100285101 Moore et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100291213 Berrigan et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100310921 Hayakawa et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110020590 Yoneda et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110030885 Anneaux et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110033705 Komura et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110036487 Rajala et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110039055 Fujisawa et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110039468 Baldwin, Jr. et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040277 Rajala et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110041471 Sebastian et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110045042 Sasaki et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110045231 Kajiwara et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110045261 Sellars Feb 2011 A1
20110046461 McKenna Feb 2011 A1
20110049769 Duchoslav et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110054429 Lademann et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110056638 Rosset Mar 2011 A1
20110059669 He et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110064928 Bonneh Mar 2011 A1
20110065573 McEneany et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110065871 Nagano et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110067369 Chung et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110068507 Warren et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110074060 Angadjivand et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110076250 Belenkaya et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110084028 Stanfel et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110091761 Miller et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110094515 Duffy Apr 2011 A1
20110104493 Barnholtz et al. May 2011 A1
20110114274 Takano et al. May 2011 A1
20110117176 Klun et al. May 2011 A1
20110117353 Henshaw et al. May 2011 A1
20110117439 Yamada et al. May 2011 A1
20110123584 Seidling et al. May 2011 A1
20110124769 Moen et al. May 2011 A1
20110124835 DeWeijer et al. May 2011 A1
20110129510 Liebmann et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110130063 Matsubayashi et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110142900 Ohta et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110143110 Tsuchiya et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110147299 Stanfel et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110171535 Ohinshi et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110171890 Nakayama et al. Jul 2011 A1
20120015577 Rudman et al. Jan 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (148)
Number Date Country
1290517 Oct 1991 CA
0340763 Nov 1989 EP
0610894 Aug 1994 EP
0610897 Aug 1994 EP
0830466 Mar 1998 EP
0836656 Apr 1998 EP
0859073 Aug 1998 EP
0880909 Dec 1998 EP
0 666 344 Sep 1999 EP
1161576 Dec 2001 EP
1 243 675 Sep 2002 EP
0 645 480 Nov 2002 EP
0 961 847 Dec 2002 EP
1359632 Apr 2003 EP
0 935 682 Sep 2003 EP
1 416 077 May 2004 EP
0 905 292 Oct 2004 EP
1538686 Jun 2005 EP
1 550 746 Jul 2005 EP
1 322 802 Aug 2005 EP
1 314 808 Jan 2006 EP
1252219 Aug 2006 EP
1 325 184 Sep 2006 EP
1 715 089 Oct 2006 EP
1 319 095 Nov 2006 EP
1 731 634 Dec 2006 EP
1 149 195 Jan 2007 EP
1 412 567 Jan 2007 EP
1 404 905 Apr 2007 EP
0 842 310 Jan 2008 EP
1 894 609 Mar 2008 EP
1 903 134 Mar 2008 EP
1 938 883 Jul 2008 EP
2082082 Jul 2009 EP
1 516 079 Dec 2009 EP
2 135 984 Dec 2009 EP
1 224 900 Jun 2010 EP
2 243 872 Oct 2010 EP
2283796 Feb 2011 EP
2287374 Feb 2011 EP
1 620 506 Mar 2011 EP
0847263 Mar 2011 EP
2292309 Mar 2011 EP
1474555 Apr 2011 EP
2308579 Apr 2011 EP
2311542 Apr 2011 EP
2311543 Apr 2011 EP
2654674 May 1991 FR
1073640 Jun 1967 GB
52066719 Jun 1977 JP
5883046 May 1983 JP
58174625 Oct 1983 JP
58220818 Dec 1983 JP
61047822 Mar 1986 JP
61-296120 Dec 1986 JP
62078213 Apr 1987 JP
63-159523 Jul 1988 JP
S63227898 Sep 1988 JP
01162825 Jun 1989 JP
1229899 Sep 1989 JP
1-272820 Oct 1989 JP
1289838 Nov 1989 JP
02-026920 Jan 1990 JP
02210092 Aug 1990 JP
316378 Mar 1991 JP
3180587 Aug 1991 JP
04057918 Feb 1992 JP
4327209 Nov 1992 JP
518334 Mar 1993 JP
1993-263316 Oct 1993 JP
05263316 Oct 1993 JP
5321106 Dec 1993 JP
6-002221 Jan 1994 JP
6-25396 Feb 1994 JP
9-77963 Mar 1997 JP
9-100397 Apr 1997 JP
9-249742 Sep 1997 JP
09-291472 Nov 1997 JP
09-310230 Dec 1997 JP
2000-95850 Apr 2000 JP
3131100 Jan 2001 JP
2001-123335 May 2001 JP
2003-253555 Sep 2003 JP
2004-137319 May 2004 JP
2004137418 May 2004 JP
2005-002510 Jan 2005 JP
2005-154450 Jun 2005 JP
2006233365 Sep 2006 JP
2010255173 Nov 2010 JP
4648815 Mar 2011 JP
2001-0044145 Jun 2001 KR
531939 Nov 2005 KR
2011-031744 Mar 2011 KR
2011-031746 Mar 2011 KR
2414950 Mar 2011 RU
2414960 Mar 2011 RU
230212 Apr 2005 TW
WO 9307197 Apr 1993 WO
WO 9424218 Oct 1994 WO
WO 9503172 Feb 1995 WO
WO 9947621 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9948668 Sep 1999 WO
WO 0166666 Sep 2001 WO
WO 02060497 Aug 2002 WO
WO 03069038 Aug 2003 WO
WO 2004067818 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2004099314 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2004113598 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2005066403 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005103354 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005103357 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006001739 Jan 2006 WO
WO 2006052732 May 2006 WO
WO 2006098851 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2006107695 Oct 2006 WO
WO 2007089423 Aug 2007 WO
WO 2007112443 Oct 2007 WO
WO 2008028134 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2008085332 Jul 2008 WO
WO 2009024836 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009051283 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009076401 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2009088564 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009140381 Nov 2009 WO
WO 2009152349 Dec 2009 WO
WO 2010114820 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2010117612 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2010123580 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2010125239 Nov 2010 WO
WO 2010140853 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2010146240 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2011015709 Feb 2011 WO
WO 2011018459 Feb 2011 WO
WO 2011008481 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011027732 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011028661 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011034523 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011047966 Apr 2011 WO
WO 2011049831 Apr 2011 WO
WO 2011049927 Apr 2011 WO
WO 2011052173 May 2011 WO
WO 2011054932 May 2011 WO
WO 2011062761 May 2011 WO
WO 2011063372 May 2011 WO
WO 2011066224 Jun 2011 WO
WO 2011070233 Jun 2011 WO
2011104427 Sep 2011 WO
2011157892 Dec 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (198)
Entry
“Choosing the Proper Short Cut Fiber”, technical data sheet, MiniFibers, Inc., [online] pp. 1-2, 2006, [retrieved on Feb. 15, 2006], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: Htts://www.minifibers,com/Literature/choosing—fiber.htm>.
PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 4, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/001082.
U.S. Appl. No. 08/550,042, filed Oct. 30, 1995, Michael C. Cook.
PCT International Search Report dated Nov. 6, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/025661.
PCT International Search Report dated Jul. 26, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/001083.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/172,257, filed Apr. 24, 2009, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Lyondall Filtration and Separation; “Nonwoven Liquid Filtration Media Construction and Performance”; Accessed from the web: http://www.lydallfiltation.com/tech/documents/Nonwovenliquidfiltration.pdf.
PCT International Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2009 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/001717.
DIN STD 54900 (in German, no English translation available).
ASTM D6340-98.
PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 7, 2005 for International Application No. PCT/US2004/018682.
Smook, G.A., “Handbook for Pulp and Paper Technologist”, Angus Wilde Publications, 2nd Ed., 1992, pp. 194-195, 211-212.
PCT International Search Report dated Dec. 30, 2009 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/025770.
Ke Qinfei, et al., “Non-woven Science”, Donghau University Press, Sep. 2004, Catalog, p. 115-132 (unavailable).
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/909,574, filed Oct. 21, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,483, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,487, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,494, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,502, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,512, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,518, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,443, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,447, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,450, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,452, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,456, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,459, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,463, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,482, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,484, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,487, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,950, filed Dec. 30, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,960, filed Dec. 30, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,982, filed Dec. 30, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,001, filed Dec. 30, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al.
New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,615, filed Mar. 22, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al.
Coons, R., “Eastman Chemical Core Focus Delivers Value,” Chemical Week, Aug. 15/22, 2011, pp. 19-22.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 12, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,502.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 9, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,482.
USPTO Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,443.
USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,484.
USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,484.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,692, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,648, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,710, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,720, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,929, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,937, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,727, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,737, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,745, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,749, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,812, filed Mar. 29, 2012.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,854, filed Mar. 29, 2012.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 7, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,459.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 17, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,001.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 21, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,450.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 23, 2012 for copending U.S.Appl. No. 13/053,615.
USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,447.
USPTO Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,518.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,955, filed Jan. 3, 2007.
USPTO Office Action dated May 21, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,982.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 4, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,960.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 7, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,487.
Database WPI, Thomson Scientific, London, GB AN2004/520211 XP002639794 & JP2004/137418 Dated May 13, 2004—abstract.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 11, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,512.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 13, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,502.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 29, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,950.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 3, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/974,452.
USPTO Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 6, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,456.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 27, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,982.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 19, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,950.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 10, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,487.
USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,304.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 31, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,456.
USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,443.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/352,362, filed Jan. 18, 2012.
USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,720.
Investigation of the utility of islands-in-the-stream bicomponent fiber technology in the spunbound process. Fedorova, Dec. 2006 (retrieved on Mar. 20, 2012 from Internet) pp. 22-23, 74 <URL: http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/5145/1/etd.pdf>.
“Choosing the Proper Short Cut Fiber”, technical data sheet, MiniFibers, Inc., [online] pp. 1-2, 2006, [retrieved on Feb. 15, 2006], Retrieved from the Inernet: <URL: htts://www.minifibers.com/Literature/choosing—fiber.htm>.
Keith, James M., “Dispersions fo Synthetic Fibers in Wet-Lay Nonwovens”. MiniFIBERS, Inc., originally published in the Tappi Journal, vol. 77, No. 6, Jun. 1994, entire document.
USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,615.
PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/057002.
USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,447.
New co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,466, filed Nov. 28, 2012.
New co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,472, filed Nov. 28, 2012.
New co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,478, filed Nov. 28, 2012.
New co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,493, filed Nov. 28, 2012.
New co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,505, filed Nov. 28, 2012.
PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/056990.
PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/056994.
PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 14, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/056989.
PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/056995.
PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/056991.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,974, filed Jan. 31, 2010, Parker, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/405,306, filed Oct. 21, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/405,312, filed Oct. 21, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/588,744, filed Nov. 11, 2011, Clark, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,854, filed Jan. 31, 2012, Parker, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,867, filed Jan. 31, 2010, Parker, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,876, filed Jan. 31, 2010, Parker, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,917, filed Jan. 31, 2010, Parker, et al.
USPTO Office Action dated May 10, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521.
USPTO Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,483.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 2, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,502.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 18, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,494.
USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507.
USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,456.
USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,463.
USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,950.
USPTO Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,982.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 3, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,487.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 23, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,452.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 2, 2012 for copending U.S.Appl. No. 12/975,452.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 28, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,960.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 15, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,960.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 13, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,487.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,487.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 9, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,512.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 21, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,512.
USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,548.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 8, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,548.
USPTO Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/344,320.
USPTO Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,868.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 9, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,955.
USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,868.
USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/344,320.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,868.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/344,320.
USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,953.
USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,304.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/344,320.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 14, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,868.
USPTO Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,953.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 4, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,304.
USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,960.
USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,482.
USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,487.
USPTO Office Action dated May 27, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,452.
USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,001.
USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,459.
USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,487.
USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,502.
USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,443.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,304.
USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,512.
USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,456.
USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,615.
USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,450.
USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,494.
USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,953.
USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507.
USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,463.
PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 7, 2005 for International Application PCT/US2004/018682.
PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 4, 2008 for International Application PCT/US2007/001082.
PCT International Search Report dated Nov. 6, 2008 for International Application PCT/US2007/025661.
PCT International Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2009 for International Application PCT/US2009/001717.
PCT International Search Report dated Dec. 30, 2009 for International Application PCT/US2007/025770.
USPTO Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,745.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,487.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 22, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,518.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 2, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507.
USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,692.
USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,720—now abandoned.
USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,710.
USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,648.
USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,749.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 10, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 8, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,483.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 10, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,447.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,463.
PCT International Search Report dated Jan. 23, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/064272.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 25, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 28, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,461.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,466, filed Nov. 28, 2012.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,472, filed Nov. 28, 2012.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,478, filed Nov. 28, 2012.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,493, filed Nov. 28, 2012.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,505, filed Nov. 28, 2012.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 21, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,482.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 22, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,518.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated May 1, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,482.
PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/022832.
PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/022834.
PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/022835.
PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/022838.
PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 29, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/022830.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 28, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 24, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,304.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 8, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,483.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 8, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,483.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 10, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,447.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,463.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 25, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521.
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 16, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,461.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100269995 A1 Oct 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61172257 Apr 2009 US