The discussion below is merely provided for general background information and is not intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Such sunshade assemblies are known in wide number of varieties. The sunscreens are tensioned in lateral direction in order to provide a sleek appearance to the people in the vehicle. The lateral edges of the sunscreen retain the edges of the sunscreen within the guides so that the sunscreen remain stretched. A spring within the winding roller ensures a reliable winding up, i.e. opening of the sunscreen, while the closing of the sunscreen is effected by moving the operating beam, either by hand or by the motorized drive. Due to the increase in size of the sunscreen and the increased sliding forces in the guides, the spring should be made stronger as well. This is a problem as the space within the winding roller is limited. Enlarging the roller would decrease the headroom within the vehicle.
This Summary and the Abstract herein are provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary and the Abstract are not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor are they intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. The claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in the background.
A sunshade assembly, in particular for use in a vehicle roof assembly, includes a flexible sunscreen having at least a central part, two opposed inwardly folded longitudinal edges connected to the central part by means of folding lines, a leading edge and a trailing edge. A winding shaft is joined the sunscreen at its trailing edge for winding and unwinding the flexible sunscreen, while an operating beam is attached to the leading edge. Two opposed longitudinal guides for retaining therein and guiding corresponding ones of the inwardly folded longitudinal edges of the flexible sunscreen. The guides are provided with locking members for engaging an outer end of the inwardly folded longitudinal edges for preventing these edges from moving out of the longitudinal guides when the sunscreen is at least partly unwound. The flexible sunscreen is provided with at least two members which are each arranged substantially parallel to a respective longitudinal edge of said sunscreen and which are buckle-stiff in a direction parallel to said longitudinal edge. The buckle-stiff members extend at least partly within and preferably are guided by said longitudinal guides along the whole length from the operating beam to the winding shaft in the fully unwound condition of the sunscreen.
Due to the buckle-stiff members, it is possible for the operating beam to push the sunscreen in order to be wound-up. The pushability of the members avoids wrinkling of the sunscreen as the members will remain stable and take the sunscreen along while being taut laterally and longitudinally. As the sunscreen can be pushed by the operating beam, the pulling force of the spring in the winding roller can be reduced so that a small spring in the winding roller might be sufficient. Lower forces will also result in a more constant operating speed.
The spring in the winding roller can even further reduced or even left out if the members are biased towards a spiral shape. Alternatively or additionally, a smaller motor may be used for driving the operating beam which will result in a lower noise level.
In one embodiment, the buckle-stiff members each comprise at least one buckle-stiff wire which may be provided at the inwardly foldable longitudinal edges. For example, the inwardly foldable longitudinal edges each comprise two integrated, substantially parallel wires.
In another embodiment, the buckle-stiff members are strips provided in the central part of the sunscreen.
In one embodiment, the strips are made of metal, in particular steel, which may have a thickness of ca. 002-0.15 mm.
Due to the small thickness of the steel strips, they will not cause problems with winding up the sunscreen. Generally, the strips will have a larger thickness when they are biased to a spiral shape. This will not hinder winding up the sunscreen as the strips will then promote winding due to their tendency to coil to their spiral shape.
In an embodiment, the central part of the sunscreen is made of cloth like material or material having similar properties, the strip may be positioned next to an edge of the cloth-like material and attached to the cloth-like material by means of a connecting member which may cover at least one side of the strip and an adjacent portion of the cloth-like material. The connecting member may be tape or woven or non-woven cloth and may be attached for example glued, welded or stitched to the material of the central part of the sunscreen.
The connecting member, such as the tape, may cover both sides of the strip, the inwardly foldable longitudinal edge and the adjacent portion of the cloth-like material in order to form a integrally bonded unit. A reinforcement, for example in the form of a strip e.g. from plastic, steel or the like, may be provided within the inwardly foldable edge, in particularly within said tape.
Alternatively, each strip is attached on a side of the central part of the sunscreen. This will lead to a more stable structure needing less lateral space, but this will cause an increased roll-up thickness.
In one embodiment, each strip is guided by the respective guide so as to reduce the buckle tendency of the members. Each guide may be shaped such that each strip is able to contact the guide at least at two separated positions, one above and one below the strip. In case each guide is shaped such that each strip is able to contact the guide at three separated positions, two are on one side and one is on the other. Each strip is then carefully guided.
Aspects of the invention will be elucidated while referring to the drawings, in which:
Firstly referring to
A sunshade assembly is positioned below the roof opening 1. Basically, said sunshade assembly comprises a flexible sunscreen 4, a rotatable winding shaft 5 for winding and unwinding the sunscreen 4 at a first transversal trailing edge and two opposite longitudinal guides 6 and 7. The panel guides 6, 7 can be connected to or formed integral from a single unitary body with the guides of the closure panel (not illustrated). Likewise, the guides 6, 7 can be separate from the guides of the panel 3. Drive members may be provided, which in
Each drive member 9, 10 is connected to an operating beam 8 provided at a transversal leading edge of the sunscreen 4 remote from the trailing edge. Although the reciprocating movement of the sunscreen 4 primarily is generated by the reciprocating movement of the drive members 9 and 10 as caused by the actuator 11, it is possible too that in addition the winding shaft 5 is preloaded in a sense for winding the sunscreen 4 thereon. Further it should be noted that the movement of the sunscreen 4 also may be initiated manually by engaging the operating beam 8.
Now, reference is made to
The strip 18 extends mainly within the guide 6, 7 so as to be invisible for occupants of the vehicle and so as to be guided by the respective guide 6, 7 to support the strip 18 to improve the buckle-resistance thereof and keep it in a straight path following the guide 6, 7. In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
The guide 6, 7 in this embodiment is also shaped such as to provide two lines of contact 21 to the area of the sunscreen 4 where the strip 18 is provided. In this embodiment, the inwardly folded longitudinal edge 4″ of the sunscreen 4 is actually folded in downward direction, so that the guide 6, 7 is also “upside down”. The line of contact 21 below the strip is positioned laterally inwardly of the line of contact 21 above the strip 18. As mentioned, this upside down arrangement offers more stability in case of a guide 6, 7 providing two lines of contact 21. However, all embodiments, including that of
The strip 18, for example spring steel, may be made in a thickness of for example 0.02-0.15 mm. The steel strip may be straight in a relaxed state, or may be spiral-shaped in a relaxed state to assist in winding the sunscreen 4. In the latter case, the steel strip will normally have a thickness in the upper region, e.g. around 0.015 mm, while the straight strip may for example be 0.05 mm in thickness. Of course, it is possible to make the strip 18 from another material (such as but not limited to other metals, plastics and/or other compositions) as long as it has the required properties of stiffness and buckle resistance.
In other embodiments (not illustrated) the following features may be incorporated: when the longitudinal edges 4″ comprise a core surrounded by a separate layer of for example tape, the core may have a reduced thickness such that the overall thickness of the edges 4″ is substantially the same as the thickness of the central part 4′ of the flexible sunscreen 4; this may apply too to parts of the central part 4′ close to the folding lines 13; a separate layer 16 surrounding the edge 4″ and extending over and beyond the folding line 13 may be provided with openings coinciding with the folding line 13; a folding line 13 may be replaced by a hinge.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above as has been held by the courts. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15157573 | Mar 2015 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1370500 | Jones | Mar 1921 | A |
1459155 | Ioor | Jun 1923 | A |
1673326 | Goldsmith | Jun 1928 | A |
3017927 | Demko | Jan 1962 | A |
4649981 | Bibeau | Mar 1987 | A |
4825921 | Rigter | May 1989 | A |
5117892 | Murray | Jun 1992 | A |
5934353 | Buhr | Aug 1999 | A |
6179373 | Bohm | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6394173 | Enssle | May 2002 | B2 |
6942003 | Thompson | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7114766 | Becher | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7114767 | Grimm | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7793702 | Biewer | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7971626 | Benz | Jul 2011 | B2 |
9090147 | Nellen | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20050225122 | Grimm | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225123 | Grimm | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060027347 | Boehm | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070175603 | Lin | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080179021 | Biewer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090145559 | Glasl | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090178771 | Lin | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110146921 | Nellen | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110227371 | Nellen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2700152 | May 2005 | CN |
1721216 | Jan 2006 | CN |
102004028882 | Jan 2006 | DE |
202006015107 | Jan 2007 | DE |
1588880 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1616737 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1953018 | Aug 2008 | EP |
1378077 | Nov 1964 | FR |
2006053520 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2009026904 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2010022769 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010063312 | Jun 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report and Written Opinion for European patent application No. 15157573, dated Sep. 2, 2015. |
Copy of European Search Report and Written Opinion for European patent application No. 15157573, dated Sep. 2, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160257184 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |