The present invention relates generally to optical elements, and particularly to diffractive optical elements.
Diffractive optical elements (DOEs) are a group of optical elements that use diffractive structures, such as gratings, to modulate the local phase of incident light. Such elements can be designed to operate in a reflective mode or in a transmissive mode. DOEs possess unique optical properties that often cannot be attained with optical elements operating on refractive or reflective principles.
Surface-relief DOEs, comprising surface-relief micro-structures, are an important subset of DOEs. The spatial dimensions of these micro-structures vary from a fraction of the operating wavelength to several hundred wavelengths. The period of the phase modulation profile of a DOE, measured in a direction parallel to the surface of the DOE, controls the angles of diffraction between the incident light and the diffracted orders. The profile of the micro-structure, defined by the height and shape characteristics of the peaks and troughs in the micro-structure, controls the diffraction efficiencies into the various orders. For example, for a DOE with a period significantly larger than the operating wavelength, most of the propagating light can be directed at a very high diffraction efficiency into a single diffraction order when the profile of the micro-structure satisfies the so-called blazing condition (see Y. Soskind, Field Guide to Diffractive Optics, pp. 56-59, SPIE Press, Bellingham, Wash., 2011).
Embodiments of the present invention that are described hereinbelow provide improved DOEs and methods for their manufacture and use.
There is therefore provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, an optical element, including first and second transmission gratings positioned in mutual proximity and in a mutually-parallel orientation and having respective first and second phase modulation profiles with a common period and different, respective first and second numbers of modulation peaks and troughs in each period.
In a disclosed embodiment, a distance between neighboring modulation peaks of the first and second transmission gratings in a direction perpendicular to a common plane of the gratings does not exceed 0.5 μm. Additionally or alternatively, the modulation peaks of the first and second transmission gratings are offset in a direction perpendicular to the common plane by a distance selected so as to maximize a diffraction efficiency of the optical element into a given diffraction order at a given wavelength and polarization of light.
In one embodiment, the first number is one and the second number is two. In an alternative embodiment, the first number exceeds one and the second number exceeds the first number.
In some embodiments, the first and second transmission gratings include surface-relief micro-structures, which define the first and second phase modulation profiles. Typically, the first and second transmission gratings include respective first and second substrates having respective surfaces on which the surface-relief micro-structures are formed, and the first and second substrates are arranged so that the respective surfaces on which the surface-relief micro-structures are formed are mutually-adjacent. In a disclosed embodiment, the first and second substrates are arranged so that the modulation peaks in the surface-relief micro-structures of the first and second transmission gratings are separated by a distance no greater than 500 nm.
There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a method for producing an optical element, which includes providing first and second transmission gratings having respective first and second phase modulation profiles with a common period and different, respective first and second numbers of modulation peaks and troughs in each period. The first and second transmission gratings are positioned in mutual proximity and in a mutually-parallel orientation.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings in which:
The diffraction efficiencies of surface-relief DOEs can be controlled by the appropriate design of the profile of the micro-structure of the surface relief. For example, a blazed transmissive DOE with a period of 20 μm and a saw-tooth shaped profile with a height of 2.08 μm, operating at a wavelength of 0.94 μm, exhibits very high diffraction efficiencies to the first (+1) diffraction order at 2.69°: The DOE will diffract 92.7% of incident TE-polarized light and 92.2% of incident TM-polarized light into the +1 order, with concomitant low diffraction efficiencies to other orders. (The terms “optical radiation” and “light” as used in the present description and in the claims refer generally to any and all of visible, infrared, and ultraviolet radiation.) The diffraction efficiency of a DOE into a given diffraction order is defined as the ratio between the optical power diffracted into that order and the optical power of the light impinging on the DOE.
On the other hand, reducing the period to 2.0 μm to increase the +1 order diffraction angle to 28.0° requires a blazed profile height of 1.62 μm, and will result in +1 order diffraction efficiencies of only 49.1% for TE-polarized light and 48.4% for TM-polarized light. By increasing the blazed profile height, higher diffraction efficiencies can be achieved, but at the cost of increasing fabrication difficulties.
In some designs, each period of the surface relief can be further divided into sub-wavelength structures, with the advantage that higher diffraction efficiencies that can be achieved at relatively shallow profile heights, using relatively simple binary step profiles. Although the profiles in such designs are shallower than those of blazed gratings, the division of the profile into sub-wavelength sections again leads to high aspect ratios with associated challenges for accurate fabrication.
Embodiments of the present invention that are described herein address these problems by providing an optical element, which is a composite of two DOEs comprising transmission gratings positioned in mutual proximity. The gratings have phase modulation profiles with a common period, but each grating has a different number of modulation peaks and troughs in each period.
In the embodiments described hereinbelow, the transmission gratings comprise surface-relief micro-structures, which define the first and second phase modulation profiles. Although the two DOEs of the composite DOE have low aspect ratios, thus enabling accurate fabrication, the diffraction efficiencies of the composite DOE are very high (>80%) even for high diffraction angles. Alternatively, the principles of the present invention may be applied, mutatis mutandis, to DOEs having other types of phase modulation structures.
In the disclosed embodiments, the two DOEs are produced individually, using methods that are known in the art, and are then positioned and mounted parallel to and facing each other, meaning that the substrates on which the surface-relief micro-structures are formed are arranged so that the micro-structures on the two substrates are mutually-adjacent, and their peaks and troughs mutually parallel. The modulation peaks in the surface-relief micro-structures on one DOE are typically separated from the modulation peaks on the other DOE by a fraction of the operating wavelength, for example by 500 nm or less. The lateral shift between the respective microstructures on two DOEs (meaning the offset between the modulation peaks in the two transmission gratings), as well as the separation between the DOEs, is chosen so as to maximize the diffraction efficiency of the composite DOE into a given diffraction order at a given wavelength and polarization of light.
In an embodiment of the present invention, one DOE includes one peak and one trough in each period of its phase modulation profile, whereas the other DOE includes two or more pairs of peaks and troughs in each period. In the design of the composite DOE, the duty cycles of the pairs of peaks and troughs in each DOE are determined so as to maximize the diffraction efficiency of the composite DOE for the given diffraction order, wavelength and polarization.
Additionally or alternatively, both the phase modulation profiles and the relative positions (separation and offset) of the two DOEs are designed so as to simultaneously both maximize the diffraction efficiency and minimize the reflection losses of the composite DOE.
The height profile can be seen as a phase modulation profile, as it modulates the phase of the optical waves impinging on the surface. The phase modulation profile comprises successive peaks and troughs, where peaks refer to points of the front surface that are farthest from the respective back plane, and troughs refer to points of the front surface that are closest to the respective back plane. The phase modulation profiles of both front surfaces 17 and 19 are periodic in the x-direction with a common period d, but with a constant profile in the y-direction. Thus, the phase modulation profile repeats itself for each shift of one period d in the x-direction. A grating vector 21, common to the first and second DOEs 12 and 14, respectively, is defined as a vector in the x-direction (in the plane of the DOEs and perpendicular to the peaks and troughs) with a length of 1/d in units of inverse length.
One period of first DOE 12 includes a first peak 16 and a first trough 18. One period of second DOE 14 includes a second peak 20 and a third peak 22 interleaved with a second trough 24 and a third trough 26. Details of the widths of peaks 16, 20, and 22 and of troughs 18, 24, and 26, are shown in
In an example embodiment, the period common to first DOE 12 and second DOE 14 is d=2.0 μm; the distance between the bottoms of the troughs of the two DOEs is h=2.0 μm; and the heights of the peaks of the two DOEs are h1=h2=0.95 μm, meaning that the peaks on one DOE are separated from those on the other DOE by only 100 nm. The lateral offset between the respective micro-structures on the first DOE 12 and second DOE 14, measured from a left edge from first peak 16 to a left edge of third peak 22, is t=0.17 μm.
For the embodiment disclosed in
Due to a coherent interaction of light between first DOE 12 and second DOE 14, the diffraction efficiency of composite DOE 10 in the present embodiment is much higher than that of each of the two DOEs separately. Similarly, the reflection losses of composite DOE 10 are much lower than the reflection losses of either first DOE 12 or second DOE 14.
In alternative embodiments, the numbers of peaks and troughs in the two DOEs forming a composite DOE may be chosen from other combinations of unequal numbers, such as, for example, one peak/trough-pair in the first DOE and three peak/trough-pairs in the second DOE, or two peak/trough-pairs in the first DOE and three peak/trough-pairs in the second DOE, or any other combination of unequal numbers for the peak/trough-pairs in the two DOEs. For each combination of peak/trough-pairs, the dimensions of the two DOEs are optimized similarly to the optimization of the embodiment disclosed in
It will be appreciated that the embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/682,944, filed Jun. 10, 2018.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3796498 | Post | Mar 1974 | A |
4386827 | Scifres et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4850673 | Velzel et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4983825 | Ichikawa | Jan 1991 | A |
5067816 | Ichikawa | Nov 1991 | A |
5225928 | Dugan | Jul 1993 | A |
5406543 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5428445 | Holzapfel | Jun 1995 | A |
5477383 | Jain | Dec 1995 | A |
5606181 | Sakuma et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5621497 | Terasawa | Apr 1997 | A |
5648951 | Kato et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652426 | Maeda | Jul 1997 | A |
5691989 | Rakuljic et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5703675 | Hirukawa | Dec 1997 | A |
5742262 | Tabata et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5781332 | Ogata | Jul 1998 | A |
5801378 | Hane | Sep 1998 | A |
5812320 | Maeda | Sep 1998 | A |
6002520 | Hoch et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6031611 | Rosakis et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6236773 | Butler et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6415083 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6560019 | Nakai | May 2003 | B2 |
6583873 | Goncharov et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6611000 | Tamura et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6707027 | Liess et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6927852 | Reel | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940583 | Butt et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7112774 | Baer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112813 | Den Boef | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123794 | Greiner et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7227618 | Bi | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7304735 | Wang et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335898 | Donders et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7433444 | Baumann | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7470892 | Ohmura | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7492871 | Popescu | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7522698 | Popescu | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7564941 | Baumann | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7700904 | Toyoda et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7952781 | Weiss et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8530811 | Molnar | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8749796 | Pesach et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8908277 | Pesach et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9036158 | Pesach | May 2015 | B2 |
9066087 | Shpunt | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9098931 | Shpunt et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9105369 | Koehler | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9131136 | Shpunt et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9201237 | Chayat et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9222899 | Yamaguchi | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9395176 | Saendig | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9689968 | Zou et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9696605 | Russo et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9874531 | Yun | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9881710 | Roessl | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10634973 | Hashemi et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10802120 | LaChapelle et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
20040012958 | Hashimoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040082112 | Stephens | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040184694 | Ridgway et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050178950 | Yoshida | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060001055 | Ueno et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060252167 | Wang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060252169 | Ashida | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269896 | Liu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070007676 | Sato | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019909 | Yamauchi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070183560 | Popescu | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080106746 | Shpunt et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080198355 | Domenicali et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212835 | Tavor | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240502 | Freedman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080278572 | Gharib et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090011368 | Ichihara | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090090937 | Park | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096783 | Shpunt et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090183125 | Magal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185274 | Shpunt | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100007717 | Spektor et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100008588 | Feldkhun et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013860 | Mandella et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100142014 | Rosen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100278479 | Bratkovski et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284082 | Shpunt et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110019258 | Levola | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110069389 | Shpunt | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075259 | Shpunt | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110114857 | Akerman et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110187878 | Mor et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110188054 | Petronius et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110295331 | Wells et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20160161427 | Butler | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20190324202 | Colburn et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190391271 | Goodwill | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200033190 | Popovich et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200290622 | Fattal | Sep 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1725042 | Jan 2006 | CN |
0670510 | Sep 1995 | EP |
2011118178 | Jun 2011 | JP |
102070349 | Jan 2020 | KR |
2007043036 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007105205 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008120217 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2010004542 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2012020380 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2019195174 | Oct 2019 | WO |
2020002164 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020072034 | Apr 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Talbot Effect”, retrieved Jan. 2022, wikipedia.org (Year: 2022). |
Fienup, J.R., “Phase Retrieval Algorithms: A Comparison”, Applied Optics, vol. 21, No. 15, pp. 2758-2769, Aug. 1, 1982. |
Garcia et al., “Projection of Speckle Patterns for 3D Sensing”, Journal of Physics, Conference series 139, pp. 1-7, year 2008. |
Garcia et al., “Three-dimensional mapping and range measurement by means of projected speckle patterns”, Applied Optics, vol. 47, No. 16, pp. 3032-3040, Jun. 1, 2008. |
Gerchberg et al., “A Practical Algorithm for the Determination of the Phase from Image and Diffraction Plane Pictures,” Journal Optik, vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 237-246, year 1972. |
Sazbon et al., “Qualitative Real-Time Range Extraction for Preplanned Scene Partitioning Using Laser Beam Coding,” Pattern Recognition Letters 26, pp. 1772-1781, year 2005. |
Moharam et al. “Rigorous coupled-wave analysis of planar-grating diffraction”, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 71, No. 6, pp. 811-818, Jul. 1981. |
Microvision Inc., “Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) Scanning Mirror”, p. 1, years 1996-2009. |
Eisen et al., “Total internal reflection diffraction grating in conical mounting”,Optical Communications 261, pp. 13-18, year 2006. |
O'Shea et al., “Diffractive Optics: Design, Fabrication and Test”, SPIE Tutorial Texts in Optical Engineering, vol. TT62, pp. 66-72, SPIE Press, USA 2004. |
Btendo, “Two Uni-axial Scanning Mirrors Vs One Bi-axial Scanning Mirror”, Kfar Saba, Israel, pp. 1-4, Aug. 13, 2008. |
Marcia et al., “Fast Disambiguation of Superimposed Images for Increased Field of View”, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, San Diego, USA, pp. 1-4, Oct. 12-15, 2008. |
Bradley et al., “Synchronization and Rolling Shutter Compensation for Consumer Video Camera Arrays”, IEEE International Workshop on Projector-Camera Systems—PROCAMS 2009, Miami Beach, Florida, pp. 1-8, year 2009. |
Ezconn Czech A.S. “Site Presentation”, pp. 1-32, Oct. 2009. |
Luxtera Inc., “Luxtera Announces World's First 10GBit CMOS Photonics Platform”, Carlsbad, USA, pp. 1-2, Mar. 28. 2005 (press release). |
Soskind, “Field Guide to Diffractive Optics,” SPIE Press, Bellingham, USA, pp. 51-55, year 2011. |
Soskind., “Field Guide to Diffractive Optics”, SPIE Press, Bellingham, USA, pp. 56-59, Aug. 18, 2011. |
Niu et al., “Development Status of Optical Phased Array Beam Steering Technology,” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 11052, pp. 110521P-1-110521P-7, year 2019. |
Rudnick et al., “Sub-GHz Resolution Photonic Spectral Processor and Its System Applications,” IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 35, No. 11, pp. 2218-2226, Jun. 2017. |
International Application # PCT/US2021/062996 Search Report dated Mar. 25, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62682944 | Jun 2018 | US |