The present disclosure relates generally to integrated circuits and more particularly to integrating super-high-voltage resistors on silicon.
The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent the work is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.
In some applications, a resistor in an integrated circuit (IC) may be subjected to a high voltage on an order of several hundred volts (e.g., an alternating current (AC) line voltage). While the resistor may be capable of withstanding the high voltage, an insulator that separates the resistor from a substrate of the IC may breakdown at a voltage less than the breakdown voltage of the resistor itself. Consequently, the voltage that can be effectively applied to the resistor may be less than the breakdown voltage of the resistor itself. In fact, the voltage that can be effectively applied to the resistor is less than the voltage at which the insulator may break down.
An integrated circuit (IC) comprises a first layer of a conducting material; a second layer of an insulating material, where the second layer has a first side arranged adjacent to the first layer, and a second side; and a substrate arranged adjacent to the second side of the second layer. A first well arranged in the substrate. The first well is adjacent to the second side of the second layer. The substrate and the first well have opposite doping.
In other features, the second layer has a breakdown voltage rating, and the second layer does not breakdown when a first voltage applied across the first layer is greater than or equal to the breakdown voltage rating of the second layer.
In other features, the substrate further comprises a third layer of the conducting material, wherein the third layer is connected to the first layer, a fourth layer of the insulating material, wherein the fourth layer has a first side arranged adjacent to the third layer, and a second side, and a second well arranged in the substrate. The second well is adjacent to the second side of the fourth layer, and the substrate and the second well have opposite doping.
In other features, the first well is connected to a junction of the first layer and the third layer.
In other features, the first well is connected to a first voltage having a value less than a second voltage applied across the first layer and the third layer.
In other features, the first well is connected to a first voltage, and the second well is connected to a second voltage. Each of the first voltage and the second voltage is less than a third voltage applied across the first layer and the third layer.
In other features, at least one of the first well and the second well is connected to a voltage point internal to the IC.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description, the claims and the drawings. The detailed description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring now to
Suppose that a very high voltage on the order of several hundred volts (e.g., the AC line voltage) is applied to terminal A of the resistor 300, and terminal B of the resistor 300 is connected to ground. A maximum value of the voltage that can be applied across the resistor 300 depends on factors including breakdown voltages of the polysilicon layer 301 and the oxide layer 302. The breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302 is generally less than the breakdown voltage of the polysilicon layer 301. Therefore, the maximum value of the voltage that can be applied across the resistor 300 is typically limited by the breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302.
Specifically, when the voltage applied across the resistor 300 is increased, a leakage current starts flowing through the oxide layer 302. The leakage current increases as the voltage applied across the resistor 300 approaches the breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302. When the voltage applied across the resistor 300 becomes equal to the breakdown voltage, the leakage current is high enough to damage the oxide layer 302. Therefore, a voltage greater than the breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302 cannot be applied across the resistor 300.
The breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302 is proportional to a thickness of the oxide layer 302. Therefore, one way to increase the value of the voltage that can be applied across the resistor 300 is to increase the thickness of the oxide layer 302. Increasing the thickness of the oxide layer 302, however, may not be feasible in a semiconductor process used to manufacture ICs. The oxide layer 302 in most currently manufactured resistors breaks down at about 300-400 volts. Accordingly, most currently manufactured resistors can withstand approximately 300-400 volts.
The resistors described below include a super-high voltage (SHV) well in the substrate of the resistor. The SHV well allows application of voltages greater than the breakdown voltage of the oxide layer (i.e., greater than 300-400 volts) across the resistor. Voltages greater than the breakdown voltage of the oxide layer can be applied across the resistor without increasing the thickness of the oxide layer.
Referring now to
In
A voltage applied at terminal A, (e.g., Va) is the voltage applied across the resistor 310 since terminal B of the resistor 310 is at ground potential. Additionally, the p-substrate 304 is at ground potential. Therefore, when Va is initially applied across the resistor 310, the SHV n-Well 312 is at ground potential (same as the p-substrate 304). When Va nears a rated breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302, the oxide layer 302 starts conducting a small leakage current. This leakage current charges the capacitor CSHV
The voltages of the capacitors Cox
Therefore, when Va reaches the rated breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302, the effective voltage across the oxide layer 302 is approximately half of the rated breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302, which prevents the oxide layer 302 from breaking down. Theoretically, the voltage at which the oxide layer 302 will in fact break down is approximately doubled. Therefore, a voltage equal to twice the rated breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302 can be theoretically applied across the resistor 310 before the oxide layer 302 can break down.
Practically, the oxide layer 302, being an insulator, has a smaller leakage current than the doped SHV n-Well 312. Consequently, the capacitors Cox
Referring now to
The second resistor 350-2 includes a second polysilicon (or metal) layer 301-2, a second oxide layer 302-2, and a second SHV n-Well-2312-2 in the p-substrate 304. The second resistor 350-2 has two terminals A2 and B2. Letters C2 and D2 denote regions of the second SHV n-Well-2312-2 that are adjacent to the second oxide layer 302-2 and that are directly below terminals A2 and B2 of the second resistor 310-2, respectively.
In
The capacitances of the first capacitor CA1C1 and the second capacitor CB1D1 are nearly the same because the materials that form the first capacitor CA1C1 and the second capacitor CB1D1 are the same. Specifically, the same first oxide layer 302-1 forms the dielectric of both the first capacitor CA1C1 and the second capacitor CB1D1. The leakage current through both the first capacitor CA1C1 and the second capacitor CB1D1 is therefore nearly the same.
Similarly, the second resistor 350-2 effectively includes two capacitors: a first capacitor CA2C2 between terminal A2 and region C2, and a second capacitor CB2D2 between terminal B2 and region D2. The first capacitor CA2C2 represents a capacitance between terminal A2 of the polysilicon layer 301-2 and the region C2 of the second SHV n-Well-2312-2. The second capacitor CB2D2 represents a capacitance between terminal B2 of the polysilicon layer 301-2 and the region D2 of the second SHV n-Well-2312-2. A well capacitance between the second SHV n-Well-2312-2 and the p-substrate 304 is negligible and therefore not shown. The capacitances of the first capacitor CA2C2 and the second capacitor CB2D2 are nearly the same.
When a voltage is applied across the resistor 350, the voltage is applied across the terminals A1 and B2. Suppose for simplicity of discussion that terminal B2 is connected to ground. Additionally, the p-substrate 304 is connected to ground. When a voltage, (e.g., Va) is applied at terminal A1 (i.e., across the terminals A1 and B2 of the resistor 350), the first resistor 350-1 and the second resistor 350-2 divide the voltage Va, and the voltage at terminals B1 and A2 is Va/2.
Now suppose, for example only, that the voltage applied across the resistor 350 (i.e., at terminal A1, with terminal B2 connected to ground), is Va=400V. The voltage at terminal B1 is Va/2=200V because the first resistor 350-1 and the second resistor 350-2 acts as a voltage divider connected between terminals A1 and B2 of the resistor 350. The voltage between terminals A1 and B1 is (400V−200V)=200V. The voltage between terminals A2 and B2 is (200V−0V)=200V.
In the first resistor 350-1, the first capacitor CA1C1 and the second capacitor CB1D1; which are nearly equal in value, and which are effectively connected in series, act as a voltage divider connected between terminals A1 and B1. The potential of the first SHV n-Well-1312-1 is therefore 300V. The effective voltage across the first oxide layer 302-1 near terminal Al and region C1 is the difference between the voltage Va at terminal A1 and the potential of the first SHV n-Well-1312-1, which is (400V-300V)=100V. The effective voltage across the first oxide layer 302-1 near terminal B1 and region D1 is the difference between the voltage at terminal B1, which is Va/2 (200V), and the potential of the first SHV n-Well-1312-1, which is 300V. That is, the effective voltage across the first oxide layer 302-1 near terminal B1 and region D1 is also 100V.
Similarly, in the second resistor 350-2, the voltage at terminal A2 is Va/2 or 200V, and terminal B2 is grounded. The potential of the second SHV n-Well-2312-2 is equal to a potential difference between terminals A2 and B2 divided by two, which is (200V−0V)/2=100V. The effective voltage across the second oxide layer 302-2 near terminal A2 and region C2 is the difference between the voltage at terminal A2, which is Va/2 (200V), and the potential of the second SHV n-Well-2312-2 (100V). That is, the effective voltage across the second oxide layer 302-2 near terminal A2 and region C2 is 100V. The effective voltage across the second oxide layer 302-2 near terminal B2 and region D2 is the difference between the voltage at terminal B2, which is 0V, and the potential of the second SHV n-Well-2312-2, which is 100V. That is, the effective voltage across the second oxide layer 302-2 near terminal B2 and region D2 is also 100V.
As another example, if Va=800V, with terminal B2 grounded, the voltage at terminal B1 may be 400V. The potential of the first SHV n-well-1312-1 may be 600V, and the potential of the second SHV n-well-2312-2 may be 200V. Accordingly, the effective voltages across the first oxide layer 302-1 and the second oxide layer 302-2 near terminal A1 and region C1, near terminal B1 and region D1, near terminal A2 and region C2, and near terminal B2 and region D2 will be 200V.
Thus, because the resistor 350 is split into two resistors each having a well and because terminal B1 of the first resistor 350-1 is at a potential greater than the ground potential, the effective voltages across the oxide layer 302-1 near terminals A1, B1 and regions C1, D1 and the effective voltages across the second oxide layer 302-2 near terminals A2, B2 and regions C2, D2 are one-fourth of the voltage applied across the resistor 350. In other words, a voltage of approximately four times the rated breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302 can be applied across the resistor 350.
Additionally, because the potential of the SHV n-well 312 can be increased to values greater than those shown in the above examples, the actual voltage that can be applied across the resistor 350 can be greater than four times the rated breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302. The maximum value of the voltage that can be applied to the resistor 350 without causing a breakdown of the oxide layer 302 is limited to a sum of the rated breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302 and a well-to-substrate breakdown voltage.
All voltage values mentioned in the disclosure are for example only. Actual values of voltages will depend on various factors. The factors may include the thickness of oxide layer 302; the doping levels of the SHV wells 312 and the substrate 304; the leakage currents of the oxide layer 302, the SHV wells 312, and the substrate 304; the areas of the SHV wells 312; the number of wells in the substrate 304, and so on.
Practically, depending on the semiconductor process used to manufacture the resistor 350, the capacitance between terminal A1 and region C1 may not be equal to the capacitance between terminal B1 and region D1, and the capacitance between terminal A2 and region C2 may not be equal to the capacitance between terminal B2 and region D2. Further, the well capacitances may not be negligible.
Referring now to
In some implementations, while not shown, the resistor 350 can be split into more than two resistors. For example, suppose that the resistor 350 is split into three resistors: a first resistor 350-1, a second resistor 350-2, and a third resistor 350-3. The first resistor 350-1 may have terminals A1 and B1; the second resistor 350-2 may have terminals A2 and B2; and the third resistor 350-3 may have terminals A3 and B3. Terminal B1 is connected to terminal A2, and terminal B2 is connected to terminal A3. Voltage applied across the resistor 350 is applied across terminals A1 and B3. Each of the first, second, and third resistors may include a well. The well of the first resistor 350-1 can be tied to terminal B1, terminal B2, or terminal B3 if terminal B3 is not grounded. The well of the second resistor 350-2 can be tied to terminal B2 or terminal B3 if terminal B3 is not grounded. With three resistors 350-1, 350-2, and 350-3, the voltage drop or field potential across each resistor is approximately the voltage at terminal A1, Va, divided by three (3). In general, with N resistors, the voltage drop or field potential across each resistor is approximately the voltage at terminal A1, Va, divided by the number of resistors N, Va/N.
In some implementations, depending on the resistance of the resistor 350 and the voltage applied across the resistor 350, the current flowing through the resistor 350 may be on the order of the leakage currents flowing through the oxide layer 302. In
Referring now to
Alternatively, as explained below, the first SHV n-well-1312-1 of the first resistor 350-1 may be tied to a voltage point internal to the first resistor 350-1 instead of being tied to a terminal of a corresponding resistor. Similarly, the second SHV n-well-2312-2 of the second resistor 350-2 may be tied to a voltage point internal to the second resistor 350-2 instead of being tied to a terminal of a corresponding resistor.
Referring now to
In
In
In
In general, the wells of the resistor 350 may be connected to a bias voltage having a known value that is less than the voltage applied across the resistor 350 so that the maximum value of the voltage that can be applied across the resistor 350 without breaking down the oxide layer 302 can be calculated. One or more wells of the resistor 350 can be connected to the same or different known voltages or can be left floating (i.e., not connected to a known potential). Any combination of these schemes to bias or not bias the wells of the resistor 350 may be used.
In summary, the voltage applied across the resistor 350 is split into at least two components: a first component that is applied across the oxide layer 302 and a second component that is applied across at least one of the wells. Such a configuration of the resistor 350 prevents the oxide layer 302 from breaking down at the rated breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302. The configuration allows voltages greater than the rated breakdown voltage of the oxide layer 302 to be applied across the resistor 350 without causing the oxide layer 302 to break down at the rated breakdown voltage.
Referring now to
The foregoing description is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses. The broad teachings of the disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent upon a study of the drawings, the specification, and the following claims. For purposes of clarity, the same reference numbers will be used in the drawings to identify similar elements. As used herein, the phrase at least one of A, B, and C should be construed to mean a logical (A or B or C), using a non-exclusive logical OR. It should be understood that one or more steps within a method may be executed in different order (or concurrently) without altering the principles of the present disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/494,619, filed on Jun. 8, 2011. The disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61494619 | Jun 2011 | US |