Patent Grant
9492952
The present invention relates to polymer-based structures having shapes and mechanical properties that result in super-hydrophilicity.
Biomaterials are being used with increasing frequency for tissue substitution, such as for joint replacements and artificial organs. Tissue integration onto or into these biomaterials enhances long-term biocompatibility of these devices, and requires a form of eukaryocytic adhesion or compatibility with possible chemical integration to an implant surface. However, in what has been characterized as a “race for the surface”, bacterial cells are known to compete with tissue cells for colonization onto the surfaces of such biomaterials. If bacterial cells are successful in colonizing an implant surface, devastating infections can occur which can require subsequent surgeries, or even result in sepsis and death, especially in immunosuppressed patients.
In “Biomaterial-Centered Infection: Microbial Adhesion Versus Tissue Integration”, by Anthony G. Gristina, Science, Vol. 237, pp. 1588-1595 (1987), the author discusses the details of biological attraction and adhesion to various biomaterial implants and concludes that an optimum mechanism for preventing bacterial infection on such surfaces would be to develop biomaterial surfaces which encourage rapid eukaryocytic colonization of the surface, so as to impart the benefits of naturally derived antibacterial mechanisms produced by the living cells adhered to the surface.
There is an ongoing need for polymer-based structures having improved adsorption of biologics, e.g., proteins. Such structures can be suited for use in various applications, such as medical applications, e.g., medical diagnostics. It is especially desirable to provide structures whose surfaces have a specific, finely-tuned adsorption of biological materials.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,246,451 discloses a vascular prosthesis made by coating a vascular graft material such as polyethylene terephthalate plasma coated with a fluoropolymer (PTFE) which is then treated with a plasma in a non-polymerizing gas atmosphere, e.g., oxygen, to improve biological entity binding to the fluoropolymer. The products of this disclosure rely on plasma treatment to improve protein binding and lack modified topography.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,195,872 teaches providing substrates of high surface area with structural microfeatures that provide access to fluids and components therein. The substrates can be prepared by molding, embossing, photoresist techniques and can also be treated by etching, e.g., with argon, oxygen, helium, chlorine, SF6, CF4, and C4F8 gases. Surfaces can be modified by chemical treatments or radiative treatments, e.g., plasma treatment in gases. The reference emphasizes topography alone to bind proteins, or alternately, additional treatment with oxygen plasma to etch the surface and ammonia plasma for grafting amine groups on the surface.
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0154063 discloses a composite nanofiber construct comprising: at least a first nanofiber comprising at least a polymer and at least a calcium salt nanoparticle, wherein the ratio of polymer to calcium salt nanoparticle is between the range of 99:1 and 10:90 weight percent; and at least a second nanofiber comprising at least a polymer and at least a calcium salt nanoparticle, wherein the ratio of polymer to calcium salt nanoparticle is between the range of 100:0 and 70:30 weight percent. Hydrophilicity of the nanofibers is enhanced by plasma treatment, which lead to good adhesion and growing of cells.
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0241512 discloses a chemical vapor deposition method of depositing layers of materials to provide super-hydrophilic surface properties, or super-hydrophobic surface properties, or combinations of such properties at various locations on a given surface. The invention also relates to electronic applications which make use of super-hydrophobic surface properties, and to biological applications which make use of super-hydrophilic surface properties.
It would be desirable to provide a highly hydrophilic surface structure which does not require a separate treatment step to enhance its hydrophilicity.
It would be further desirable to provide wettable polymer-based structures of substantially fixed topography having controllable adsorption of biologics, e.g., proteins, by adjusting characteristics of a substrate to provide a topography of enhanced surface area that is relatable or proportional to the surface adsorption of a biologic material.
The present invention relates to a polydioxanone film comprising substantially cylindrical polydioxanone pillars on at least one side thereof, said pillars having a diameter from about 0.6 μm to about 3 μm, and a height of up to about 20 μm from the surface of the film.
In another embodiment, the invention is directed to a process for adsorbing proteins, comprising exposing a protein-containing solution to a polydioxanone film comprising substantially cylindrical polydioxanone pillars on at least one side thereof, said pillars having a diameter from about 0.6 μm to about 3 μm, and a height of up to about 20 μm from the surface of the film.
In a further embodiment, the invention is directed to a medical implant comprising a polydioxanone film comprising substantially cylindrical polydioxanone pillars on at least one side thereof, said pillars having a diameter from about 0.2 μm to about 3 μm, and a height of up to about 20 μm from the surface of the film.
The present invention is directed to high aspect ratio (HAR) polydioxanone (PDO) film having surface microstructures which demonstrates super-hydrophilic wetting characteristics, having an inherent static water drop contact angle of less than about 10°. It has been discovered that the super-hydrophilic nature of these structures enhances biologics, particularly protein adsorption onto the surfaces thereof.
The materials of the present invention are useful in various applications relying on biologic adsorption, e.g., protein adsorption, including diagnostic tests and other medical uses such as anastomosis devices, grafts, vascular prosthetic devices, soft tissue implants.
Biologics, for present purposes, include sugars, proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, polynucleotides or complex combinations of these substances, as well as living entities such as cells and tissues. Biologics can be isolated from a variety of natural sources—human, animal, or microorganism—and may be produced by biotechnology methods and other technologies. In some instances, biologics can be prepared using non-biological, chemical methods. Biologics include a wide range of medicinal products such as vaccines, blood and blood components, allergenics, somatic cells, gene therapy, tissues, and recombinant therapeutic proteins created by biological processes (as distinguished from chemistry).
Biologic adsorbent material made from polymer or comprising polymer can be formed into structures having high surface area topography. Structures can have tailored geometric features including substructures, e.g., pillars, with a diameter from 0.1-50 micrometers (100-50000 nm) and height greater than 1 micrometer (>1000 nm), which provide surface area greater than that of a substrate comprised of exposed flat surfaces. Protein adsorbency of a substrate is not dependent on surface area alone. It has now been found that in order to effectively utilize increased surface area of a substrate, adsorption by the substrate surface comprising substructures can be optimized to improve hydrophilicity/wettability. The polymeric structures according to the present invention of desirable high surface area topography exhibit improved biologics adsorption even without treating of the surfaces, e.g., by oxygen plasma.
In one aspect the present invention relates to a super-hydrophilic structure having a PDO film surface from which extend substantially cylindrical pillar-like protrusions, which protrusions are of sufficiently low diameter to promote adsorption of naturally occurring proteins. Advantageously, the pillars have average diameters ranging from about 0.1 to about 3 micrometers, average lengths (or heights) greater than about 1 micrometer and aspect ratios (length/diameter) of from about 1 to 33. More preferably, the pillars have average diameters ranging from about 0.2 to about 1 micrometer, average lengths greater than about 3 micrometers and aspect ratios (length/diameter) of from about 2 to 30.
Preferably, the PDO pillars have average diameters from about 0.2 micrometer to about 1 micrometer, and heights of about 2 micrometers to about 20 micrometers from the surface of the PDO film. In particular, when the PDO pillars have average diameters from about 0.6 micrometer to about 1 micrometer, and heights of about 20 micrometers from the surface of the PDO film, the film has been found to demonstrate super-hydrophilicity, i.e. static water drop wetting angles of less than about 10°, in the absence of any post-treatment of the film/pillar surfaces. However, post-treatment by such as oxygen plasma treatment can be optionally performed to enhance the hydrophilicity of larger diameter pillars, such as those having average diameters of about 3 micrometers.
In still another embodiment, the super-hydrophilic structure is integrally molded from a PDO resin or polymer, which is thermoplastic. By integrally molded is meant that the structure is formed in one piece, including its protrusions, from a mold. For present purposes, thermoplastic resin or polymer is a resin or polymer that softens when heated and hardens again when cooled.
In yet still another embodiment, the super-hydrophilic structure surface is substantially planar and the pillars are within ±45 degrees of normal to the planar surface, preferably within ±30 degrees of normal to the planar surface
In another embodiment, the super-hydrophilic structure has a pillar density of from 1×105 to 6×108 pillars/cm2. For present purposes, “pillar density” can be described as the number of pillars present per square centimeter of super-hydrophilic structure surface. For example, the super-hydrophilic structure has a density of pillars on its surface ranging from about 1×107 to about 5×107 pillars per cm2.
In yet another embodiment, the super-hydrophilic structure has a protein adsorption capacity from about 2.5 μg/cm2 to about 6.0 μg/cm2, or from about 4.0 μg/cm2 to about 6.0 μg/cm2 of the film surface.
The super-hydrophilic structure of the present invention can be at least partially formed by a process selected from nano- or micro-molding using a template, polymer self-assembly, lithography, and etching.
In another embodiment, the invention is directed to a process for adsorbing proteins, comprising exposing a protein-containing solution to a polydioxanone film comprising substantially cylindrical polydioxanone pillars on at least one side thereof, said pillars having diameters from about 0.2 μm to about 3 and heights of about 2μm to about 20 μm from the surface of the film. Optionally, the pillars are treated with an oxygen plasma to increase the oxygen content of the pillars, relative to untreated polydioxanone pillars.
In a further embodiment, the invention is directed to a medical device comprising a polydioxanone film comprising substantially cylindrical polydioxanone pillars on at least one side thereof, said pillars having diameters from about 0.2 μm to about 3 and heights from about 2 μm to about 20 μm from the surface of the film. The medical devices can include medical implants, for example, anastomosis devices, grafts, vascular prosthetic devices and soft tissue implants.
The method for preparing a super-hydrophilic structure comprises: a) providing a specific solvent-dissolvable mold including pores or indentations; b) providing a meltable PDO polymer to the mold under conditions sufficient to permit filling the indentations of the mold by the polymer, said polymer being substantially non-dissolvable by the specific solvent; c) treating the mold and polymer of step b) to an extent sufficient to substantially solidify the polymer; and d) exposing the mold and polymer to the specific solvent under mold-dissolving conditions to provide a molded polymer substrate material comprising protrusions or pillars conforming to the indentations or pores of the mold. Optionally, this aspect further comprises at least one of the following conditions:
In one embodiment, the first stage is carried out at a temperature ranging from 90 to 110° C., pressure ranging from about 0 to about 20 kPa (about 0 to about 0.2 Bar), for a duration of 7 to 12 minutes, and the second stage is carried out at a temperature ranging from 90 to 110° C., pressure ranging from about 6 to about 20 kPa (about 0.06 to about 0.2 Bar), for a duration of 15 to 25 minutes.
Optionally, in order to further enhance hydrophilicity, the PDO pillars and film surface can be treated with oxygen plasma, such as at 50 to 150 watts for 15 to 45 seconds, or at 75 to 125 watts for 25 to 35 seconds.
The invention is further explained in the description that follows with reference to the drawings illustrating, by way of non-limiting examples, various embodiments of the invention.
A 100 micrometers thick polydioxanone film with pillar-like structures on both sides was prepared. A polydioxanone film was compressed under heat and pressure between two 20 micrometers thick sheets of polycarbonate filter material. The filter material possesses microscopic (0.8 micrometer) holes. The polydioxanone film melted and flowed into the holes. After processing the sheet was annealed. The polycarbonate membrane filter was then dissolved in a bath of dichloromethane. The membrane filters used (0.8 micrometer ATTP, Cat No. ATTP14250, Lot No. R9SN70958 available from Millipore Corporation of Billerica, Mass., USA) possessed two distinct sides. One side had a shiny appearance while the other was duller. A laminate for compression molding was constructed as follows:
The resulting sample was loaded into a heated press with vacuum (less than 150 micrometers mercury) capability and was processed as follows:
The sample was annealed in the constrained condition (between two steel plates) in an inert environment (nitrogen gas) for a minimum of six hours at 70° C.
The polycarbonate membrane had been fused to the surface of the polydioxanone film. The membrane was removed from the surface of the polydioxanone film by immersing the sample in a bath of dichloromethane at room temperature for five minutes and was allowed to air dry prior to handling. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the sample confirmed the presence of pillar-like structures which were about 20 micrometers high and 0.8 micrometer in diameter.
PDO pillars of 0.6, 1, and 3 micrometer diameters and heights of 20 micrometers were fabricated on PDO film essentially by the method set forth in Example 1, using commercial track etched polycarbonate membranes as a mold and a nanoimprinting process. Membranes having pores of 0.6 and 1 micrometer diameters and circular diameters of 4.5 cm, with thicknesses of 20 micrometers were obtained from Whatman, Florham Park, N.J. Membranes having pores of 3 micrometers diameter and circular diameters of 4.5 cm, with thicknesses of 20 micrometers were obtained from Millipore Corporation of Billerica, Mass., USA. The membranes were used as templates to imprint a solvent-resistant PDO polymer film of 0.3 millimeter thickness, obtained from Ethicon, Inc. of Somerville, N.J., USA. The PDO film was pressed into the polycarbonate membrane templates under high temperature and pressures (120° C., 6000 kPa (60 bar)) for 5 minutes, melting the PDO. The PDO films with the imprinted PC membrane were placed between 2 metal plates and annealed for 3 hours at 70° C. The polymer structures were de-molded and released by dissolving the polycarbonate membrane in dicholoromethane. Films were immersed in two consecutive dichloromethane baths for 5 minutes per wash and then air dried.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the samples confirmed the presence of pillar-like structures which were about 20 micrometers high.
The surface area ratio for these structures is more than 2 times the surface area of a flat film as shown in Table 1 below.
The surfaces of the PDO films were treated by oxygen plasma treatment using a microwave plasma processor (100 W, 30 seconds). Surface elemental analysis was conducted on the flat PDO films to determine the oxygen content of the film surfaces both before and after oxygen plasma treatment. The results are set forth in Table 2 below.
Static water contact angle measurements, herein referred to as contact angle measurements, were conducted using a sessile drop method. A Rame-Hart contact angle goniometer with Drop Image software was used. Plasma treatment was done immediately before contact angle measurement. Two microliter drops of de-ionized water were placed on the surface for measurement, and 5 measurements were taken for each surface. The mean contact angles are reported in Table 3.
Pillars with diameters 0.6 and 1 micrometer were wettable even without oxygen plasma treatment. The contact angle of PDO surfaces patterned with 3 um pillars increased slightly compared to the flat film. Oxygen plasma treatment increased the wettability of the flat and 3 um pillar surfaces.
The protein adsorption or protein uptake properties of these samples were evaluated by incubating the samples in protein solution and assaying using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay. Films were cut into 1×1 cm pieces and incubated in 1 ml of fibrinogen protein solution (2 mg/ml in phosphate buffered saline (PBS)) in a sealed 24-well plate overnight (18 hrs) with orbital shaking. After protein incubation the films were removed from the wells and washed in 3 consecutive baths of PBS and then immediately quantified using the BCA Assay.
The BCA assay was conducted as follows: protein standards were made using the bovine serum albumin (BSA) standard provided in the BCA kit (QuantiPro BCA kit, Sigma Aldrich). Rinsed films were placed in wells of a 24-well plate containing 500 microliters PBS+500 microliters BCA reagent (prepared as per kit instructions). For protein standards, 500 microliters of protein standard solution was placed in the well with 500 microliters BCA reagent. The plate was sealed and protected from light and incubated with orbital shaking at 50 rpm for 2 hrs at 37° C. After incubation, 200 microliters of the solution was transferred to wells of 96-well plate for absorbance reading at 562 nm.
Increasing levels of fibrinogen adsorption were observed as the surface area of the sample increases. This trend was observed for both untreated and plasma-treated HAR pillar samples, since both exhibit similar water contact angle profiles. This trend was observed for fibrinogen as shown in
All patents, test procedures, and other documents cited herein, including priority documents, are fully incorporated by reference to the extent such disclosure is not inconsistent and for all jurisdictions in which such incorporation is permitted.
When numerical lower limits and numerical upper limits are listed herein, ranges from any lower limit to any upper limit are contemplated.
The invention being thus described, it will be apparent that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of, and claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. Ser. No. 12/871,745, filed Aug. 30, 2010, and a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 13/340,331, filed Dec. 29, 2011, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4256693 | Kondo et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4464254 | Dojki et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4557264 | Hinsch | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4753776 | Hillman et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4911165 | Lennard et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 5011494 | von Recum et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5176692 | Wilk et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5246451 | Trescony et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5246666 | Vogler et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5324519 | Dunn et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5344611 | Vogler et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5352229 | Goble | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5455009 | Vogler et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5569272 | Reed et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5723219 | Kolluri et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 6217540 | Yazawa et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6220453 | Kitajima et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6267772 | Mulhauser et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6368871 | Christel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6403655 | Bezwada et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6485503 | Jacobs et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6638284 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6703041 | Burns et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6720469 | Curtis et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6872439 | Fearing et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6913697 | Lopez et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 7074294 | Dubrow | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7195872 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7331199 | Ory et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7479318 | Jagota et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7745223 | Schubert et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7754233 | Andjelic et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7988733 | Shimp et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8133484 | Preiss-Bloom et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8307831 | Rousseau | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 20030208888 | Fearing et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040076822 | Jagota et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125266 | Miyauchi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050065463 | Tobinaga et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050095699 | Miyauchi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050106552 | Ikeda | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181629 | Jagota et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060005362 | Arzt et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034734 | Schubert et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078724 | Bhushan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060087053 | O'Donnell et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154063 | Fujihara et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204738 | Dubrow et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070227967 | Sakaino et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299542 | Mathisen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080124246 | Diaz-Quijada et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080217180 | Doye et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080241512 | Boris et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080241926 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280085 | Livne | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090130372 | Fukui et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318843 | Van Holten et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100098909 | Reyssat et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137903 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249913 | Datta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110021965 | Karp et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110063610 | Ivanov et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110160869 | Duch et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110172760 | Anderson | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110177288 | Bhushan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178535 | Whitman | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282444 | Liu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293667 | Baksh et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120052234 | Natarajan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120143228 | Natarajan et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120251611 | Luong-Van et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120302427 | Elmouelhi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120302465 | Elmouelhi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130172927 | Natarajan et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130206330 | Natarajan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130266761 | Ho et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130267880 | Luong-Van et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130288225 | Elmouelhi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140120314 | Ho et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101849281 | Sep 2010 | CN |
| 4126877 | Nov 1992 | DE |
| 19832634 | Jan 2000 | DE |
| 0358372 | Mar 1990 | EP |
| 1416303 | May 2004 | EP |
| 2062611 | May 2009 | EP |
| 2004170935 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2013-226413 | Nov 2013 | JP |
| 2013226413 | Nov 2013 | JP |
| 193370 | Oct 2013 | SG |
| 0056808 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| 03099160 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| 2004094303 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2006031197 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2008076390 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2008076390 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2008102620 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2009022911 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009029045 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| 2009067482 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009123739 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2010033725 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010129641 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 2011026987 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012030570 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012162452 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013102085 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| 2013163304 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Roure et al. “Force mapping in epithelial cell migration”. Feb. 15, 2005, PNAS, vol. 102, No. 7, p. 2390-2395. |
| Oxford Dictionary Online, “cylinder”. <http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/cylinder?q=cylinder> (see attached pdf file). |
| [NPL #1] Saez, et al. “Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates”. (May 15, 2007), Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (PNAS), vol. 104, No. 20, pp. 8281-8286. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,745, filed Aug. 30, 2010. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,331, filed Dec. 29, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,405, filed Dec. 29, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/116,721, filed May 26, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,496, filed Apr. 6, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,539, filed Apr. 6, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/458,825, filed Apr. 27, 2012. |
| Anthony G. Gristina, “Biomaterial-Centered Infection: Microbial Adhesion Versus Tissue Integration”, Science, vol. 237, pp. 1588-1595 (1987). |
| International Search report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/048584 dated Feb. 20, 2012. |
| International Search report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/072081 dated Mar. 12, 2013. |
| Definition of “Integral”, Merriam-Webster Dictionary online, pp. 1-3, Accessed Oct. 15, 2013. |
| S.D. Lee, “Surface Modification of Polypropylene Under Argon and Oxygen-RF-Plasma Conditions”, Plasmas and Polymers, vol. 2, No. 3, Sep. 1, 1997, pp. 177-198. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2013/038007 dated Jun. 18, 2013. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2012/039256 dated Mar. 5, 2013. |
| Wan Y., et al., “Characterization of surface property of poly (lactide-co-glycolide) after oxygen plasma treatment”, Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers, vol. 25, No. 19, Aug. 1, 2004, pp. 4777-4783. |
| Jianhua Wei, et al., “Influence of surface wettability on competitive protein adsorption and initial attachment of osteoblasts; Competitive protein adsorption and initial cell attachment”, Biomedical Materials, Institute of Physics Publishing, vol. 4, No. 4, Aug. 1, 2009, p. 45002. |
| Tsougeni K., et al., “Mechanisms of oxygen plasma nanotexturing of organic polymer surfaces: From stable super hydrophilic to super hydrophobic surfaces”, Langmuir, American Chemical Society, vol. 25, No. 19, Oct. 6, 2009, pp. 11748-11759. |
| Messina G.M.L., et al., “A multitechnique study of preferential protein adsorption on hydrophobic and hydrophilic plasma-modified polymer surfaces”, Colloids and Surfaces. B., Biointerfaces, vol. 70, No. 1, Apr. 1, 2009, pp. 76-83. |
| Chen H. et al., “The effect of surface microtopography of poly (dimethylsiloxane) on protein adsorption, platelet and cell adhesion”, Colloids and Surfaces. B., Biointerfaces, vol. 71, No. 2, Jul. 1, 2009, pp. 275-281. |
| Search Report of Singapore Patent Application No. 2013086434 dated Dec. 4, 2014. |
| Written Opinion of Singapore Patent Application No. 2013086434 dated Jan. 16, 2015. |
| Chang, T.C., Plasma Surface Treatment in Composites Manufacturing, Journal of Industrial Technology, Nov. 1, 1998-Jan. 1999, vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-7, Table 1. |
| Office Action dated May 22, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/116,721; 27 pages. |
| Office Action dated May 22, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,405; 30 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 6, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/841,561; 4 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,259; 11 pages. |
| Sriram Natarajan, U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,745, filed Aug. 30, 2010. |
| Noha Elmouelhi, U.S. Appl. No. 13/116,721, filed May 26, 2011. |
| Sriram Natarajan, PCT No. PCT/US2011/048,584 Filed Aug. 22, 2011. |
| Sriram Natarajan, U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,331, filed Dec. 29, 2011. |
| Noha Elmouelhi, U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,405, filed Dec. 29, 2011. |
| Emma Kim Luong-Van, U.S. Appl. No. 13/435,544, filed Mar. 30, 2012. |
| Audrey Yoke Yee Ho, U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,496, filed Apr. 6, 2012. |
| Emma Kim Luong-Van, U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,539, filed Apr. 6, 2012. |
| Noha Elmouelhi, U.S. Appl. No. 13/458,825, filed Apr. 27, 2012. |
| Sriram Natarajan, U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,259, filed Dec. 28, 2012. |
| Sriram Natarajan, PCT No. PCT/US2012/072081 filed Dec. 28, 2012. |
| Sriram Natarajan, U.S. Appl. No. 13/841,561, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
| Noha Elmouelhi, PCT No. PCT/US2013/038007 filed Apr. 24, 2013. |
| Sitti, “High Aspect Ratio Polymer Micro/Nano-Structure Manufacturing using Nanoembossing, Nanomolding and Directed Self-Assmbly”, IEEE/ASME Advanced Mechatronics Conference, Kobe, Japan, Jul. 2003 (5 pages). |
| Tsougeni, et al. “Nano-texturing of poly (methyl methacrylate) polymer using plasma processes and applications in wetting control and protein adsorption”, Microelectronic Engineering 86 (2009), pp. 1424-1427. |
| Vlachopoulou, et al., “Effect of surface nanostructuring of PDMS on wetting properties, hydrophobic recovery and protein adsorption”, Microelectronic Engineering 86 (2009), pp. 1321-1324. |
| Gristina, “Biomaterial-Centered Infection: Microbial Adhesion Versus Tissue Integration”, Science, vol. 237, Sep. 25, 1987, pp. 1588-1595. |
| Won, et al., “The Fabrication of Protein Nano Arrays Using 3-Dimensional Plastic Nanopillar Patterns”, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2011, vol. 11, pp. 4231-4235. |
| Zhao, et al., “Self-organized Polymer Aggregates with a Biomimetic Hierarchical Structure and its Superhydrophobic Effect”, Cell Biochem Biophys (2007) 49: pp. 91-97. |
| Bhushan, et al. “Self-Cleaning Efficiency of Artificial Superhydrophobic Surfaces”, Langmuir, 2009, 25, pp. 3240-3248. |
| Shi, et al., “Communication towards bioinspired superhydrophobic poly (L-lactic acid) surfaces using phase inversion-based methods”, Bioinsp. Biomim. 3 (2008) (6 pages). |
| Jung, et al., “Wetting Behavior of Water and Oil Droplets in Three-Phase Interfaces for Hydrophobicity/philicity and Oleophobicity/philicity”, Langmuir 2009, 25 (24), pp. 14165-14173. |
| Lee, et al., “Fabrication of Heirarchical Structures on a Polymer Surface to Mimic Natural Superhydrophobic Surfaces”, Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, pp. 2330-2335. |
| Cha, et al., “Effect of Replicated Polymeric Substrate with Lotus Surface Structure on Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Behaviors”, Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11, pp. 1357-1363. |
| Yanagishita, et al., “Anti-Reflection Structures on Lenses by Nanoimprinting Using Ordered Anodic Porous Alumina”, Applied Physics Express 2 (2009) (3 pages). |
| Schulte, et al., “Heirarchically structured superhydrophobic flowers with low hysteresis of the wild pansy (Viola tricolor)—new design principals for biomimetic materials”, Bellstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, pp. 228-236. |
| Bhushan, et al., “Micro-, nano- and Heirarchical structures for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning and low adhesion”, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2009, 367, pp. 1631-1672. |
| Occhiello, et al., “Oxygen-Plasma-Treated Polypropylene Interfaces with Air, Water, and Epoxy Resins: Part 1. Air and Water.”, 1991, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 42, pp. 551-559. |
| Gerard, et al., “Surface modifications of polypropylene membranes used for blood filtration”, 2011, Polymer, 52, pp. 1223-1233. |
| Sriram Natarajan, PCT No. PCT/US2011/048584 Filed Aug. 22, 2011. |
| Noha Elmouelhi, PCT No. PCT/US2012/039256 filed May 12, 2012. |
| Audrey Yoke Yee Ho, U.S. Appl. No. 14/139,673, filed Dec. 23, 2013. |
| European Search Report of European Application No. 12863230.4 dated Jul. 20, 2015. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120251611 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13340331 | Dec 2011 | US |
| Child | 13435544 | US | |
| Parent | 12871745 | Aug 2010 | US |
| Child | 13340331 | US |
