The signals at the bases of Q1-Q4 are designated as X+Y, X−Y, Y−X and −X−Y, respectively. The variables X and Y are defined as X=VX/2VT and Y=VY/2VT, where VT is the thermal voltage kT/q. Thus, X and Y are normalized dimensionless variables. The need for the factor 2 in the denominator is apparent from
For a generalized common-emitter multi-tanh transistor cell having N transistors, the collector currents bear the following relationships:
Inserting the base voltages and adding the collector currents with the appropriate phasing as shown in
Using the truncated expansion exp(u)≈1+u+u2/2 for the exponential functions of the individual transistors it can be shown that the differential output current IOUT may be approximated as follows:
The product term (X2+Y2) diminishes when X and Y are relatively small, and thus the equation collapses to IOUT≈XYIT which provides a useful multiplication function at low input signal levels. As the magnitude of the X or Y input increases, however, the product term (X2+Y2) in the denominator of Eq. 3 increases to the point that the approximation breaks down. In a typical implementation, the multiplier of
To gain a better understanding of the inventive principles of this patent disclosure, some of the salient aspects of the prior art will first be discussed with reference to
Another possible approach to increasing the linear input range of a multi-tanh cell involves the use of transistors having different emitter areas. However, in the circuit of
A tail current IT is coupled to the common emitter node N1 to bias the multi-tanh cell 10, thereby setting the initial (or nominal) transconductance of the cell. However, an extra transistor Q is coupled to the common emitter node and arranged to dynamically divert a portion of the tail current from the multi-tanh cell. In this example, the emitter of Q is coupled to the common emitter node, the collector is attached to a point such a power supply where the diverted tail current may be routed, and the base is anchored to any suitable point that may, for example, be responsive to the inputs of the multi-tanh cell.
By diverting a portion of the tail current at low input signal levels, the extra transistor may increase the compliance of the common emitter node. For example, a conventional multi-tanh cell may be designed to operate with a certain amount of tail current IT1. By adding the extra transistor Q, the value of IT may be increased to provide an additional amount of tail current IT2 which is normally diverted by Q. Thus, the tail current is normally split between the multi-tanh cell and the extra transistor Q. However, when the magnitude of one or more of the input signals increases to a level that would exceed the linear input range of the multi-tanh cell, some of the additional tail current IT2 may be redirected back from Q to the multi-tanh cell, thereby extending the linear input range. Moreover, this increase in linear range may be obtained without increasing the noise floor as discussed below.
Because the extra transistor Q5 is outside of the multi-tanh core, its size may be varied relative to the other transistors without destroying the symmetry of the core. A variable K may be defined as the emitter area of Q5 relative to the emitter areas of transistors Q1-Q4. Eq. 2 may then be modified as follows:
The linearity of this function with respect to either X or Y may be considerably enhanced for K>0 which may be implemented by the extra transistor Q5.
The expansion of exp(u) used to generate the approximation for Eq. 3 is less accurate here, but as a rough guide, the result is
Although the approximation of Eq. 5 is not as analytically rigorous as the approximation of Eq. 3, it is still useful for conceptualizing the effect of the emitter area ratio K on the operation of the circuit. The output may be described as being “diluted” in a sense by the factor (1+K). That is, K works by diluting the nonlinearity of X2+Y2 in the denominator. As K increases, more of the tail current under quiescent conditions is diverted by Q5. Increasing the value of K enables the circuit to accommodate large input signal swings.
To better illustrate these effects, some example vales will be assigned to the variables. For purposes of illustration and computational simplicity, Q5 will be assumed to have an emitter area of 9 units, while Q1-Q4 are assumed to have emitter areas of 1 unit each. Thus, K=9 in this example, and all 5 transistors have a combined emitter area of 13 unites. Also, the tail current IT is assumed to have a nominal value of 13 milliamps. Under quiescent conditions, 1/13th of the total tail current, or 1 mA, flows through each of Q1-Q4, and 9/13ths of the total tail current, or 9 mA, flows through Q5. Therefore, the total common mode current coming out of the multiplier core is 4/13ths of the total tail current. This might initially seem to indicate worse noise performance because the output is reduced, but the noise would seem to be worsened by partition noise. However, the partition effect only affects the common mode noise which is related to the total current coming out of Q1-Q4. Thus, the presence of Q5 extends the upper end of the linear input range without increasing the noise floor at the lower end.
The embodiment of
Although the increased number of transistors may initially seem to introduce a possibility of device mismatches, the large number of devices may actually result in self-canceling deviations and thus, there may be no performance penalty from a device matching point of view. Moreover, the increased number of devices may enable more robust cross-quadding arrangements. Note that the effective area of the combination of Q5, Q5A, etc. is the geometric mean of the emitter areas, and thus, may be achieved through various combinations of device sizes.
where X and Y are multiplier inputs and U is a scaling input.
An advantage of the arrangement of
The inventive principles relating to multi-tanh cells having extra transistors may be utilized in a dual multiplier feedback arrangement as illustrated in
The system of
The outputs of the first and second multipliers are combined at an integrating node N2 which may be a simple summing node or, in the case of a differential embodiment, a pair of summing nodes. A buffer 22 provides the final output W as a differential voltage ±VW. The integrating action of the buffer forces the outputs of the multipliers to be equal. Assuming the scaling factors of the two multipliers are made equal, α1=α2, and the output may be expressed as follows:
Thus, the architecture of
The inventive principles of this patent disclosure have been described above with reference to some specific example embodiments, but these embodiments can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from the inventive concepts. For example, some transistors have been illustrated as bipolar junction transistors (BJTs) of specific polarities, but MOS and other types and polarities of devices may be used as well. Thus, the terms base, emitter and collector are understood to refer to the corresponding terminals of other types of transistors. Area ratios may be realized with actual device sizes, or they may be realized as synthesized area ratios, collective unit devices, etc. Thus, emitter area refers to effective emitter area. Likewise, the emitters of the transistors in a common-emitter multi-tanh cell may be connected directly to the common-emitter node, which itself may include multiple nodes, or coupled indirectly through other components, e.g., emitter resistors.
As a further elaboration, according to some inventive principles of this patent disclosure, four resistors may be tied from the emitters of Q1-Q4 to a common dangling node. Such resistors would exert an expansion of the transfer function to work against the compression at high inputs, albeit at the expense of some temperature sensitivity which may be minimized by choosing an appropriate temperature shape for the tail currents.
The output from a multiplier cell according to some inventive principles of this patent disclosure may be obtained by using nothing more than low-value resistive loads at the summed collector outputs. In other embodiments, cascodes may be included between the core collectors and the system outputs to minimize the Miller multiplication of the parasitic capacitance that the summing nodes are burdened with. In more demanding applications, a broadband transimpedance output stage may be utilized, such as the triple Darlington-type arrangement shown in FIGS. 17 and 18 of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0030121 by the same inventor as the present patent disclosure, which is incorporated by reference.
Since the embodiments described above can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from the inventive concepts, such changes and modifications are considered to fall within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/912,158 having the same title and filed Apr. 16, 2007 which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5589791 | Gilbert | Dec 1996 | A |
5926408 | Kimura | Jul 1999 | A |
5986494 | Kimura | Nov 1999 | A |
6204719 | Gilbert | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6437630 | Gilbert | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456142 | Gilbert | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6549057 | Gilbert | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20030030478 | Gilbert | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040164784 | Umeda | Aug 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080252355 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60912158 | Apr 2007 | US |