Patent Grant
9371187
The present invention relates to automated conveying systems, and more particularly to a system and method for supercharging a belt in tube conveyor for agricultural products, to enable achieving a full or increased fill level of the belt entering the intake end of the conveyor tube. The supercharging is achieved by propelling the crop material onto the conveyor belt or the material previously deposited on the belt, substantially, or at least largely, in a direction of movement of the belt, and after the belt has been at least substantially transitioned into a concave shape for passage through the tube, such that significant directional change or movement in a direction other than the direction of movement of the belt, are avoided.
To increase productivity, agricultural vehicles, such as combines, are becoming larger, headers are becoming wider, and travel speeds are increasing during harvest. Additionally, harvesting operations in a large field often involve simultaneous harvesting and unloading of harvested crop material. Typically, the combine has an unloading system including an unloading tube containing a helical auger, that is deployed for unloading crop material from an on board grain tank into an accompanying receiving container, such as a tractor pulled cart, wagon, truck, trailer, or the like. However, this manner of unloading has been found to be slower than desired for many agricultural operations. Also, as a consequence of necessary spacing between the auger flight edges and the interior surface of the unloading tube, the crop material can be damaged therebetween.
Belt conveyors have found to be an advantageous alternative to auger type conveyors for several reasons. For instance, the belts are lighter, less costly, and may be operated at faster speeds than augers and thus have higher potential capacity. Belt conveyors can also deliver the crop material in a more continuous manner with less vibration. In general, it has been found that conveying crop material using belts results in less crop damage than augers.
As a result, for some agricultural applications, it is desired to replace auger conveyors with belt conveyors. Particularly for unloading conveyors of agricultural harvesters, wherein the unloading often occurs while the harvester is moving, including over uneven terrain and while on slopes and hills, under windy and other adverse weather conditions, it is desired to utilize covered conveyors, such as belt in tube conveyors. In a belt in tube conveyor, the belt runs through an elongate tube, typically having a lower peripheral portion of round or curved sectional shape, and the belt conforms to the lower periphery of the tube, so that an upwardly concave, typically curved shape, is imparted to the belt, particularly an upwardly facing material carrying feed surface thereof. The belt then typically returns externally along the underside of the tube. Generally, the ends of the belt encircle cylindrical rollers, such that the ends of the belt adjacent and about the rollers are flat and wider than a sideward extent or diameter of the unloading tube. Before or as the belt enters the tube, it is gradually transitioned in some manner from the flat shape to conform to the concave, e.g., curved or rounded, shape of the lower portion of the tube.
In use, belt in tube conveyors are typically fed from a hopper, bin or other container, and the only force acting on the material is gravity, so that the material is only propelled downwardly, although it may fan out or be directed laterally by a spout or chute. The downwardly flowing material can be accelerated by gravity to a significant downward velocity, and is typically deposited on a belt moving horizontally or at an upward incline, so both the direction of movement of the material will have to be changed, possibly significantly (e.g., from directly downward to an upward incline), and energy imparted to the material by its downward movement will have to be dissipated and/or redirected in some manner. The material is typically deposited onto the flat region of the belt or partially onto the transition region outside of the tube where the belt is formed into the concave shape. As the belt is transitioned to the concave shape while carrying material, some of the material will be lifted and shifted laterally toward the center of the belt, possibly while additional material is deposited onto it, such that turbulence can occur that will impede movement and acceleration of the material to the belt speed, which can decrease the effective capacity of the conveyor and conveying speed.
It has also been observed that the belt's fill level is reduced as the speed of the belt increases and the incline of the conveyor increases. For example, some known commercially available portable belt conveyors operate at belt speeds of about 600 feet per minute, and at inclines of 15 to 30 degrees. These are within the anticipated ranges of speeds and inclines desired for unloading application for agricultural vehicles, particularly harvesters. Experience with these conveyors in conveying common grains is that the belt is less than full at these conditions, with a general rule that the fill decreases as the incline increases, largely for the reasons just explained. As a result, use of belt in tube conveyors for unloading applications has been found to suffer from shortcomings in terms of speed and/or capacity.
Thus, what is sought is a manner of increasing the fill of a belt in tube conveyor system for agricultural products to take advantage of the potential speed of operation and other benefits thereof, particularly for use as an unloading conveyor for a machine or vehicle such as a harvester, and which overcomes one or more of the shortcomings and limitations, set forth above.
What is disclosed is a supercharging feed system and method for a belt in tube conveyor, that adapts the conveyor for use for unloading, particularly, an agricultural vehicle such as but not limited to, a harvester, so as to provide one or more of the capabilities and advantages, and overcome one or more of the shortcomings and limitations, set forth above.
According to a preferred aspect of the system and method of the invention, the belt in tube conveyor or associated structure includes a transition portion or region associated with an intake end of the conveyor tube. The transition portion or region has a sectional shape that tapers or gradually changes to transition the belt from a flat shape as it comes off of a roller or other rotary end element of the conveyor, to an upwardly open curved concave shape of the lower portion of the conveyor tube that bounds an intake end of the tube and a passage therethrough, and which supports the belt therein, such that as the belt moves over the transition portion at a belt velocity or speed, and into or toward the intake end of the tube, it is transitioned into the concave shape of the lower portion of the tube wherein the sides of the belt will extend upwardly about the inner lower periphery of the conveyor tube, moving at the belt speed and bounding the sides of a crop receiving channel or cavity through the tube.
According to another preferred aspect of the invention, the system includes a crop delivery apparatus configured and disposed to propel a substantial portion of the crop material at a crop velocity substantially, or at least largely in the feed direction, so as to be directed into the crop receiving cavity and deposited at least substantially or largely onto the concave portion of the belt or the existing crop material on the concave portion. As a non-limiting example, for a belt in tube conveyor that is horizontal or oriented at a small inclined angle upwardly toward the outlet end, the crop delivery apparatus can be configured to propel the crop material horizontally, or at a similar incline to horizontal, either upwardly or downwardly. As a result, the crop material is not required to significantly change direction when deposited on the belt or material on the belt, as it is already moving at least largely in the feed direction of the belt, and the belt is already substantially or at least largely in the concave shape, such that little or no shifting or other extraneous movement of the material occurs, as would be the case using essentially just gravity feed or a spout to feed the material onto the belt, and onto the belt while still largely flat or still transitioning into the concave shape of the lower portion of the conveyor tube. Contact with stationary side wall and other enclosing structure is also avoided, which can further disrupt and impede crop material flow. The crop material flow can be further focused using additional structure above the belt, including above the concave portion. This can be advantageous, as it allows the belt in tube conveyor to be rotated or pivoted sidewardly about the intake end, relative to the crop delivery apparatus. As a non-limiting example, about a 30 degree range of sideward movement can be allowed, while still providing desired fill capabilities, to enable varying a position of a discharge end of the conveyor relative to a receiving container such as a truck or wagon, in the manner of known unloading conveyors, for distributing the unloaded crop material within the receiving container.
Suitable preferred crop delivery apparatus for use in the invention can include a centrifugal discharge elevator, such as, but not limited to, a centrifugal discharge paddle or a bucket elevator, or a belt conveyor, configured and oriented to mechanically propel the crop material in a suitable airborne manner, substantially, or at least largely, in the feed direction, and with sufficient velocity to pass over the end roller and transition portions of the conveyor belt, so as to enter the crop receiving cavity bounded by the concave shape of the belt and land at least largely or mostly on that portion, as opposed to on the flat or still transitioning portion. The centrifugal discharge elevator is more preferred for use with an agricultural harvester such as a combine, as it provides both the ability to lift the crop material, for instance, from adjacent the bottom of an on-board grain tank, and to change the direction of the movement while accelerating the material to a sufficient velocity for airborne movement over the end and transition portion of the belt and at least mostly onto the concave portion. For applications where suited, a conventional belt conveyor or other conveyor can be alternatively utilized, if configured to impart the required velocity in the required direction to the crop material.
As another preferred aspect of the invention, the system includes structure enclosing the upper end of the crop delivery apparatus and an upper portion of the intake end of the belt in tube conveyor, to provide a substantially continuous enclosed path for containing the airborne flow of the material over the transition portion of the conveyor belt and focusing the material into the crop receiving cavity and onto the concave portion of the belt, which will preferably about coincide about with the intake end of the conveyor tube. In this latter context, this structure will preferably shape or focus the flow of crop material from a wider conveyor or elevator, so as to correspond width-wise at least generally to the width of the concave portion of the belt, and height-wise so as to smoothly enter the crop receiving cavity bounded by the concave portion of the belt.
Operationally, the flow characteristics of the crop material achieved by the system of the invention are advantageous, as much of the material that contacts the belt or material previously deposited on the belt, will be traveling at least largely in the direction of belt movement, such that its propulsion energy, e.g., momentum, will be in that direction, so that it will readily feed onto the belt or existing material thereon and not require major redirection or dissipation of energy imparted by gravity and resulting downward velocity as would be the case if the material was gravity fed. Additionally, because the crop material is contacting the moving upstanding side portions of the belt instead of stationary walls or other enclosure, associated drag and further disruption or impedance of flow are avoided.
As another advantage, because the flow path of the material is preferably close to the belt and will be essentially parallel or near parallel to the feed direction, if it is still airborne as its propulsion energy is expended or about expended, it will fall only a small distance onto the belt or material on the belt and thus will not develop significant downward velocity from gravity. As a result, the material will be deposited on the belt with little disruptive effect and can be readily accelerated to the belt speed by contact with the belt or the existing material on the belt. In any event, because the material is propelled at least largely in the feed direction and relatively close to the belt or existing material thereon, it will not have to change direction in a significant manner, at least vertically, to then travel with and on the belt, which has been found to be a key aspect of achieving the fill capability sought. In this latter regard, as noted above, the system of the invention is configured and operable to allow the belt in tube conveyor to be pivoted or otherwise moved sidewardly at an angle to the crop delivery apparatus and thus the airborne flow of the crop material, while still providing the enhanced feed capability, largely as a result of the concave shape of the belt and its containing effect.
According to another preferred aspect of the invention, the upper portion of the intake end of the belt in tube conveyor or associated structure enclosing the flow path can comprise a tapered or frusto-conical shape that extends convergingly in the feed direction toward the main portion of the tube, so as to effectively function as the guide for containing the propelled crop material flow to largely the direction of belt movement, that is, parallel with or so as to intersect it at a small angle to parallel, and to contain the overall width of the flow to about that of the concave shaped portion of the belt. Preferably the length of the tapered or frusto-conical shaped upper portion of the tube or other enclosing structure will be about one to two times greater than a width of the conveyor tube, to provide a smooth flow shaping capability, particularly focusing, again, without significantly changing the direction of movement of the crop material or reducing its velocity.
As a non-limiting operational example, the belt in tube conveyor can have a belt speed of about 600 feet per minute, while the initial crop velocity can be less than half that speed, as long as it is adequate to propel the crop material over the transition portion of the belt and onto the concave portion. The airborne crop material, as it loses its velocity, will fall from the flow, but because it is moving in the feed direction and has momentum in that direction, will readily travel with and accelerate to the belt velocity by virtue of contact with the belt surface and/or other material on the belt. Thus, a high initial crop speed is not required to provide adequate fill and unloading capability for a typical combine harvester application.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like numbers refer to like items,
Referring also to
Supercharged feed system 18 of the invention includes a crop delivery apparatus 48 configured and operable to receive crop material from grain tank 28 or another source on combine 20, via operation of conveyor system 34 (
A preferred crop delivery apparatus 48 comprises a centrifugal discharge elevator, including paddle or bucket crop propellers 50 mounted at spaced locations along a drive belt 52, chains or the like. A drive 54, which can comprise a conventional hydraulic or electric motor, belt, shaft, and/or chain drive, is connected to one end of an upper roller of the elevator encircled by belt 52, and is configured and operable to drive belt 52 and propellers 50 carrying quantities of the crop material, denoted by arrows A in
Referring also to
Because the prior known systems use gravity feed, the material's propulsion energy is downward. It has additionally been observed that the flow of crop material falling from above, such as from a hopper 62, tends to naturally fan out somewhat as it falls under the force of gravity prior to reaching belt 64. This is illustrated by arrows H. Much of the crop material will also have velocity components in directions transverse to or opposite the feed direction F (which can be inclined upwardly), so that substantial directional change is required, both in terms of velocity and energy, e.g., momentum. Some of this energy will be overcome by the conveyor drive 54, and some will be dissipated through deflecting and bouncing of the particles of material, all of which can disrupt and impede the smooth flow and passage of the material into the intake end of the conveyor, to reduce fill.
In contrast, as illustrated also in
An upper portion 56 of conveyor tube 26 preferably includes a portion 76 having a frusto-conical, tapered, or other converging shape encompassing or adjacent to intake end 30 and near transition portion 44. The direction of convergence is in feed direction F, such that upper portion 56 essentially acts to contain and focus the flow of propelled crop material from crop delivery apparatus 48 (which here is wider) into cavity 40 and onto concave portion 46. In particular, upper portion 56 will preferably shape or focus the flow of crop material so as to correspond width-wise at least generally to the width of concave portion 46, and height-wise so as to smoothly enter intake end 30.
System 18 additionally preferably includes an enclosure 74 extending substantially between crop delivery apparatus 48 and concave portion 46, defining and enclosing a flow path 72 for the crop material to intake end 30 of the conveyor tube, as a non-limiting example, configured as an extension of housing 58 of crop delivery apparatus 48, and configured in mating relation, e.g., overlapping or underlapping relation, to converging portion 76 of upper portion 56 of conveyor tube 26, to cooperate with crop delivery apparatus 48 to contain and direct the propelled crop material over transition portion 44 of the belt and toward the intake end. In addition, enclosure 74 and upper portion 56 shield the crop material from the elements, particularly in the presence of winds that could change the direction of the flow.
In order to maintain a more even fill level in the receiving container 22 or truck, an additional preferred feature of system 18 is the ability of conveyor tube 26 to pivot sidewardly relative to combine 20, preferably about a point P near intake end 30, for directing discharge end 32 over the receiving container 22 at more forward or rearward positions as denoted by arrows X and Y (
As an additional capability of system 18 of the invention, it is operable to provide desired fill levels with the associated belt in tube conveyor oriented in a relatively wide range of inclines, generally up to about the angle of repose of the material being conveyed (angle at which the grain will slide down a slope), which in the case of many agricultural grains, is about 28 degrees or so. In the present embodiment, conveyor system 24 in the deployed or unloading position is illustrated inclined upwardly by less than that amount when combine 20 is on a level surface, which will accommodate operation at an additional upward side tilt for operation on hillsides and the like, without the angle of repose of the grain reducing feed capability significantly. In this orientation, feed direction F is inclined upwardly toward discharge end 32. It can be observed that upper portion 56 of conveyor tube 26 and associated enclosure 74 are about horizontal, or possibly inclined downwardly a slight amount. As a result, the direction of the crop material flow as denoted by arrows B and C is horizontal or slightly downwardly at a small angle to horizontal, e.g., of for instance 10 degrees or less, relative to the upwardly inclined feed direction F, which demonstrates values within a larger range of relative angular relationships between feed system 18 and conveyor system 24 of which the term “largely” is deemed inclusive. To further illustrate the possible operational angles of the system of the invention,
Advantages of the system and method disclosed for supercharging the feed to the belt in tube conveyor of the present invention include the capability to achieve full or near full fill levels at high conveyor belt speeds but relatively slower crop delivery speeds, and with less grain damage than conventional helical augers.
It will be understood that changes in the details, materials, steps, and arrangements of parts which have been described and illustrated to explain the nature of the invention will occur to and may be made by those skilled in the art upon a reading of this disclosure within the principles and scope of the invention. The foregoing description illustrates the preferred embodiment of the invention; however, concepts, as based upon the description, may be employed in other embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the following claims are intended to protect the invention broadly as well as in the specific form shown.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007910 | Stephens | Jul 1935 | A |
| 2978095 | Jenike | Apr 1961 | A |
| 3268060 | Long | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3429422 | Yoshimura | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3438584 | Klein | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3586156 | Easley, Jr. | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3647049 | Hartzell, Jr. | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3889802 | Jonkers | Jun 1975 | A |
| 4646910 | Johanson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4681214 | Karpisek | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4760913 | Tschantz | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4800902 | Maust | Jan 1989 | A |
| 5343761 | Myers | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5351558 | Horn et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5369603 | Myers | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5496215 | Underwood et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5509854 | Underwood | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5560246 | Bottinger et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5686671 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5750877 | Behnke et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5857907 | Underwood | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5863247 | Behnke et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5890961 | Behnke et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 6012272 | Dillon | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6125618 | Dillon | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6135171 | Weakly et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6155407 | Shelstad | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6170644 | Nakaegawa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6293389 | Knapp et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6339917 | Dillon et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6350197 | Cooksey et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6360878 | Deal et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 7000758 | Björklund | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7325673 | Kotaki et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7654387 | Armstrong | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 8186497 | Mackin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8241098 | Latimer | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8616364 | Priepke | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2100956 | Jan 1971 | DE |
| 4217209 | May 1991 | DE |
| 2715388 | Jul 1995 | FR |
| 5292831 | Nov 1993 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150027854 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
