Concentrating Solar Power systems (CSP) utilize solar energy to drive a thermal power cycle for the generation of electricity. CSP technologies include parabolic trough, linear Fresnel, central receiver or “power tower,” and dish/engine systems. Considerable interest in CSP has been driven by renewable energy portfolio standards applicable to energy providers in the southwestern United States and renewable energy feed-in tariffs in Spain. CSP systems are typically deployed as large, centralized power plants to take advantage of economies of scale. A key advantage of certain CSP systems, in particular parabolic troughs and power towers, is the ability to incorporate thermal energy storage. Thermal energy storage is often less expensive and more efficient than electric storage and allows CSP plants to increase capacity factor and dispatch power as needed—for example, to cover evening or other demand peaks.
Current CSP plants typically utilize oil, molten salt or. steam to transfer solar energy from a solar energy collection field, tower or other apparatus to the power generation block. These fluids are generally referred to as “heat transfer fluids” and are typically flowed through heat exchange apparatus to heat water to steam or to heat an alternative “working fluid” which is then used to drive a turbine and generate electrical power. Commonly utilized heat transfer fluids have properties that in certain instances limit plant performance; for example, synthetic oil heat transfer fluid has an upper temperature limit of 390° C., molten salt has an upper temperature limit of about 565° C. while direct steam generation requires complex controls and allows for limited thermal storage capacity. Higher operating temperatures generally translate into higher thermal cycle efficiency and often allow for more efficient thermal storage. However, higher temperatures also require the use of more exotic materials and cause greater optical and thermal losses.
Current CSP plants that rely upon a heat transfer fluid circuit in thermal communication with a separate working fluid circuit necessarily require complex, bulky and costly heat exchange apparatus between the heat transfer and working fluid circuits. In addition, the relatively low density of many working fluids when applied to a turbine (superheated steam for example) requires relatively large turbine blades to accomplish a desired quantity of work. The combination of bulky heat exchange apparatus with large turbine structures causes the power block of most CSP plants to be a large facility which is located away from the solar receiver. For example, the power block in a conventional tower-based CSP facility might be located on the ground away from the solar energy receiver which is situated at the top of a tower.
The embodiments disclosed herein are intended to overcome one or more of the limitations noted above. The foregoing examples of the related art and limitations related therewith are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, not limiting in scope. In various embodiments, one or more of the above-described problems have been reduced or eliminated, while other embodiments are directed to other improvements.
One embodiment is a solar power generation system including a working fluid circuit providing for the flow of supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) therein. The system also includes a solar energy receiver in thermal communication with the working fluid circuit providing for solar heating of the S-CO2 working fluid; a power turbine in fluid communication with the S-CO2; a generator mechanically coupled to the power turbine; a compressor turbine in fluid communication with the S-CO2 and a compressor mechanically coupled to the compressor turbine such that the compressor is configured to compress the S-CO2 within a portion of the working fluid circuit.
The solar power generation system may, in selected embodiments, maintain the S-CO2 within the working fluid circuit without phase change. The above system is therefore configured to provide a Brayton power cycle. The system may include a single power turbine/compressor turbine shaft or the system may include a power turbine shaft and a separate compressor turbine shaft providing for the independent rotation of the power turbine and the compressor turbine. The system further includes at least one recuperator in thermal communication with the S-CO2 working fluid.
In one possible embodiment, the solar energy receiver, working fluid circuit, power turbine, generator, compressor turbine, compressor, and at least one recuperator are each located within or on a tower. In an alternative embodiment selected apparatus may be located near, but separate from the tower.
The solar power generation system may optionally include a thermal energy storage system in thermal communication with the S-CO2 working fluid. In this alternative configuration, the S-CO2 functions as a working fluid and a heat transfer fluid.
An alternative system embodiment includes a primary Brayton power block utilizing S-CO2 working fluid as described above and a secondary, typically Rankine cycle, power block associated with the primary power block. Such an alternative system includes but is not limited to a heat exchanger in thermal communication with the primary working fluid circuit downstream from the power turbine; a secondary working fluid circuit containing a secondary working fluid in thermal communication with the heat exchanger; a secondary power turbine in fluid communication with the secondary working fluid; and a secondary generator mechanically coupled to the secondary power turbine.
The secondary working fluid may be any suitable fluid including water/steam or an organic fluid. In certain embodiments of a system featuring a secondary power block the solar energy receiver, working fluid circuit, power turbine, generator, compressor turbine, compressor, heat exchanger, secondary working fluid circuit, secondary power turbine and secondary generator are each located within or on a tower.
Another alternative system embodiment is a solar power generation system comprising a working fluid circuit providing for the flow of S-CO2 therein; a solar energy receiver in thermal communication with the working fluid circuit providing for solar heating of the S-CO2 working fluid and a Brayton cycle power block in fluid communication with the S-CO2. This alternative embodiment may optionally include a Rankine cycle power block in thermal communication with the Brayton cycle power block. Either of the above variations may optionally be configured such that all receiver and power block apparatus is located on or in a tower. The foregoing embodiments may optionally include a thermal energy storage system in thermal communication with the S-CO2.
Another alternative embodiment is a method of generating electricity from solar energy. The method includes at least the steps of providing a working fluid circuit having S-CO2 flowing therein, the working fluid circuit being in fluid communication with a solar energy receiver, a power turbine, a compressor turbine and a compressor. The method further includes the steps of flowing S-CO2 through the solar energy receiver causing the S-CO2 to be heated with concentrated solar energy; flowing heated S-CO2 from the receiver through the power turbine and the compressor turbine causing the power turbine to rotate and drive a generator to generate electrical current. The method also uses heated S-CO2 to cause the compressor turbine to rotate to drive the compressor. Thus, S-CO2 from the power turbine may be flowed through the compressor causing compression of the S-CO2.
The foregoing method embodiment further includes cooling the S-CO2 flowing from the power turbine to the compressor with at least one recuperator. In some embodiments the power turbine may be caused to rotate at a first selected speed and the compressor turbine may be rotated at a second selected speed which is different from the first selected speed. S-CO2 may optionally be flowed through a thermal energy storage system.
An alternative method includes the above steps plus the steps of flowing the S-CO2 through a heat exchanger in thermal communication with a secondary working fluid circuit and flowing the secondary working fluid through a secondary power turbine to rotate and drive a secondary generator to generate electrical current.
Another alternative method of generating electricity from solar energy includes providing a working fluid circuit having S-CO2 flowing therein, the working fluid circuit being in fluid communication with a solar energy receiver, and a Brayton cycle power block, this embodiment includes the steps of flowing S-CO2 through the solar energy receiver causing the S-CO2 to be heated with concentrated solar energy and flowing heated S-CO2 from the receiver through the Brayton cycle power block to drive a generator to generate electrical current. This method may optionally include the steps of flowing S-CO2 through a heat exchanger to heat a secondary working fluid in a secondary working fluid circuit and flowing heated secondary working fluid from the heat exchanger through a Rankine cycle power block to drive a secondary generator to generate electrical current.
In addition to the exemplary aspects and embodiments described above, further aspects and embodiments will become apparent by reference to the drawings and by study of the following descriptions.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced figures of the drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than limiting.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, dimensions, reaction conditions and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about”.
In this application and the claims, the use of the singular includes the plural unless specifically stated otherwise. In addition, use of “or” means “and/or” unless stated otherwise. Moreover, the use of the term “including”, as well as other forms, such as “includes” and “included”, is not limiting. Also, terms such as “element” or “component” encompass both elements and components comprising one unit and elements and components that comprise more than one unit unless specifically stated otherwise.
The following disclosure relates to concentrating solar power (CSP) systems and methods. Various embodiments disclosed herein feature solar heated supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) as the working fluid CSP power block. In certain alternative embodiments the S-CO2 may also function as a heat transfer fluid. Generally, a CSP working fluid expands within or before a turbine to perform work, for example electrical generation or fluid compression. Generally, a heat transfer fluid exchanges thermal energy with another substance, for example, a working fluid or a thermal energy storage material.
As used herein, supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) is defined as a fluid state of carbon dioxide held at or above its critical temperature and critical pressure. Carbon dioxide usually behaves as a gas in air at standard temperature and pressure (STP) or as a solid “dry ice” when frozen. If the temperature and pressure of carbon dioxide are both increased from STP to be at or above the critical point for carbon dioxide, the material can adopt properties midway between a gas and a liquid. More specifically, carbon dioxide behaves as a supercritical fluid above its critical temperature (31.1° C.) and critical pressure (72.9 atm or 7.39 MPa). S-CO2 expands to fill its container like a gas but has a density similar to that of a liquid.
Various embodiments disclosed herein feature S-CO2 as the working fluid in a closed-loop recompression Brayton cycle power block. These embodiments offer the potential of equivalent or higher cycle efficiency versus supercritical or superheated steam working cycles at temperatures relevant for CSP applications.
In selected embodiments S-CO2 is utilized in a single phase process as both heat transfer fluid (HTF) and thermal power cycle working fluid. As detailed below, the dual functionality of S-CO2 simplifies power system configuration. The embodiments disclosed herein are also compatible with sensible or latent heat thermal energy storage based upon heat exchange with a thermal energy storage material. The simpler machinery and compact size of the S-CO2 apparatus disclosed herein may reduce the installation, maintenance and operation cost of a system of given size. In particular, Brayton-cycle systems using S-CO2 as working fluid can be designed to have smaller weight and volume, lower thermal mass and less complex power blocks versus Rankine cycle based systems due to the higher density of the S-CO2 working fluid and simpler cycle design. The lower thermal mass of various embodiments also makes startup and load change faster for frequent start up/shut down operations and load adaption when compared to a conventional HTF/steam based systems.
The
The receiver 104 is in thermal communication with a working fluid circuit 120 which has S-CO2 flowing therein as working fluid. Thus, concentrated sunlight reflected from the heliostats 105 is received at the receiver 104 and heats the S-CO2 to an operational temperature. The remaining elements described above and other elements described below are in fluid communication with the S-CO2 flowing within the working fluid circuit 120 or in certain instances in thermal communication with the S-CO2working fluid.
For example, in the
S-CO2 exits the power turbine 110 at a lower temperature and pressure than present at the power turbine inlet. To complete a Brayton power cycle the S-CO2 must be further cooled and re-pressurized before it is re-heated at the receiver 104. Thus, S-CO2 exiting the power turbine flows through one or more recuperators, for example high temperature recuperator 122 and low temperature recuperator 124. One or more supplemental pre-coolers, for example pre-coolers 126 and 128 may further cool the S-CO2 prior to compression of the super-critical working fluid in the compressor 108. As noted above the compressor system 108 is driven by compressor turbine 106 and may be implemented with multiple stages including but not limited to pre-compressor 114, main compressor 116 and re-compressor 118.
After compression, the pressurized S-CO2 working fluid may be flowed back to the receiver 104 for heating. It may be noted from
Accordingly, the system 100 of
The power block of the system 100 features a dual shaft design that separates gas compression and power generation. It is important to note that alternative embodiments may feature a single shaft which enhances fabrication simplicity and minimizes capital cost at the expense of operational flexibility. If a dual shaft embodiment is installed. One benefit is that the power turbine shaft 130 and gas compressor shaft 132 can run at differing speeds. In particular, the compressor 108 can be run at a speed selected to maximize compression efficiency while the power turbine 110 can be run at constant speed in synchronization with the power grid frequency.
An alternative face-to-face layout of twin power turbines 110 (see
Because of the compact mechanical form achievable with a single phase S-CO2 turbine/compressor system 100, it is possible to reduce the size of the generation unit and incorporate the system within a single housing if desired and integrate the generation unit into the receiver 104 and tower 102 portions of a receiver/tower assembly as depicted in
One possible set of dimensions and operational parameters for a 10 MW integrated tower based S-CO2 system 100 are given in Table 1. The final selected turbine/compressor size depends on power rating and design parameters, such as compression ratio, shaft speed, and operational considerations such as the selection of axial or radial flow for the compressor and turbine.
It is important to note that the system 100 described in detail above may be implemented with a greater or lesser number of components selected to achieve efficient energy generation utilizing S-CO2 as the working fluid of a Brayton cycle power block. The various embodiments disclosed herein are not limited to the precise configuration of
As noted above, the modular and integrated power block design of
The compressor 108 and compressor turbine 106 may be run at much higher speeds for better efficiency. Selecting a relatively high shaft speed for the compressor 108 and compressor turbine 106 reduces the sizes of these components and improves performance, as indicated in Table 2.
Table 2 shows the turbine size, shaft speed, and CO2 mass flow rate for systems having a power rating of 0.3, 3 and 300 MW. For example, a 3 MW system can be designed to have a 15 cm (6 inch) power turbine operating with a shaft speed of 50,000 RPM. An apparatus of this size may readily be located within a tower and associated with a solar receiver 104 as depicted in
An alternative embodiment of the system 100 which includes thermal energy storage is also shown in
Any type of TES can be adapted for use with the system 100, provided the selected TES is designed to properly exchange heat energy with the S-CO2 working fluid of the described embodiments. Thus, in an alternative implementation where the system 100 includes a TES system 136, the S-CO2 functions as both working fluid and heat transfer fluid. One representative but non-limiting example of a TES 136 suitable for implementation in conjunction with system 100 is a two tank system utilizing molten salt as a heat storage material. A two-tank salt system maintains hot and cold salt in separate tanks. During discharge, the salt is pumped from a hot tank to a cold tank through heat exchangers that exchange heat from the hot molten salt to the S-CO2 flowing in the working fluid circuit 120. The process is reversed during charging such that heat is transferred to the molten salt from the S-CO2 which is functioning as a heat transfer fluid (HTF). Generally, any TES configurations will provide for several operational modes including a generation mode where all HTF is used for power generation and compressor operation, a charge mode where HTF is sent to the storage system and heat is stored in the thermal energy storage tank(s) and a discharge mode where the power block is driven by the thermal energy from the storage tank instead of heat from solar receiver.
The shortcomings of a two-tank salt system include high system and material costs and a temperature cap (less than 600° C.) for salt stability when implemented with a sodium/potassium nitrate salt blend as is typical in known liquid salt TES implementations. Other TES technologies under development involve thermocline TES, TES utilizing the latent heat of phase-change materials, or TES systems utilizing other low-cost; stable heat storage materials for high performance and more economical operations. Low-cost high-temperature storage can improve the described S-CO2 system overall efficiency, increase capacity factor and reduce cost. A suitable TES 136 system could be integrated into the tower to minimize S-CO2 pipe runs. Alternatively, a suitable TES system 136 may be ground mounted and feature a molten salt heat storage material which is pumped to multiple towers.
For high temperature storage, thermal storage materials other than nitrate salts may be necessary for stability and high energy density, for instance, salt or metal alloys with phase-change temperatures matching the S-CO2 temperature range, solid storage media, or a high temperature salt or metal. Since S-CO2 cycles are highly recuperated and the turbine expansion ratio is limited, the temperature window for a suitable heat source is narrow. This operational consideration limits the utility of sensible heat storage systems in combination with a S-CO2 system such as system 100. A supplemental power block cycle such as described in detail below may be considered to expand the heat source temperature difference by lowering the returning temperature of S-CO2 flowing back to the receiver 104. Alternatively a phase-change TES system may be deployed that operates over a more narrow temperature window. Aluminum and aluminum alloys are promising candidates with large heats-of-fusion in the 550 to 700° C. range. The use of a metallic alloy also eliminates the thermal conductivity limitations experienced with salt phase change materials.
In an S-CO2 Brayton cycle system 100 as described above, a major cost of the components may not be the turbine and compressor elements, as these components can be relatively small and somewhat economical to produce. On the contrary, a significant cost associated with a system 100 would be associated with the heat recuperator(s) 122 and 124 and pre-cooler(s) 126, 128, as these heat exchange elements are subject to very high pressure differentials. One way to mitigate this cost is to add a “bottom” or secondary power cycle to the system. For example the system may be expanded to include a Rankine cycle or in particular an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) power block to minimize the physical size necessary to accommodate the large temperature and pressure gradients present in the recuperator and pre-cooler elements. Adding an ORC power block may also be beneficial to an S-CO2 Brayton cycle system by potentially converting up to 20% of the waste heat from the Brayton cycle power block into electricity, which increases overall cycle efficiency. The combined Brayton cycle/Rankine cycle plant may thus compares favorably in both performance and cost to other known types of CSP power block configurations.
A representative but non-limiting example of a system 300 featuring an S-CO2 upper Brayton cycle power block 302 and a lower Rankine cycle power block 304 is shown in
The system 300 is modular and can be integrated with a tower in a manner similar to the system 100 of
The system 300 also includes a lower, secondary, Rankine power block 304. The Rankine power block 304 includes a secondary working fluid circuit 324 having a secondary working fluid flowing therein. The secondary working fluid may, for example, be water/steam or an organic working fluid. During operation, the secondary working fluid is heated by heat exchange with S-CO2 flowing in the primary working fluid circuit 312. Heat exchange between the primary S-CO2 working fluid and the secondary working fluid may occur in any suitable heat exchanging apparatus including but not limited to the preheater 326, evaporator 328, superheater 330 and reheater 332 of
As further illustrated in
As noted above, a system 300 including a lower Rankine power block 304 is advantageous in at least three ways. First, the waste heat from the upper Brayton cycle power block 302 is captured and used to generate electricity. Second, S-CO2 primary working fluid undergoes temperature reduction as heat is exchanged with the secondary working fluid circuit 324. Thus, proper Brayton cycle operation may be maintained with relatively smaller and less expensive recuperator 320 elements. Finally, the expanded temperature differential in the S-CO2 primary working fluid circuit 312 facilitates sensible heat thermal energy storage if desired.
The system 300 can also be implemented with an optional TES system 344 as described above. Furthermore, because of the compact mechanical form achievable with a single phase S-CO2 Brayton cycle power block 302, it is possible to reduce the size of the entire generation unit and integrate the generation unit into a receiver/tower assembly 306, 308. The benefits of integrating the entire system 300 with a tower include shorter piping and thus reduced pressure loss, reduced thermal loss, and improved transient response. As a result, an integrated tower based system may achieve high performance and significant cost benefits for CSP power generation. Alternatively, the Brayton cycle power block 302 may be incorporated into a tower with heat exchange between several towers and a lesser number of Rankine power blocks 304 occurring at a ground-based secondary plant.
Table 3 compares the gross cycle efficiency of a simple recuperated S-CO2 Brayton cycle system and a recompression S-CO2 Brayton cycle system versus a typical subcritical reheat steam cycle as used in a power tower. The tabulated steam values are based upon a wet-cooled, direct steam receiver system. The simple S-CO2 cycle provides an improvement relative to the current state-of-the-art if higher operating temperatures are employed, while the more complex recompression cycle achieves substantially higher efficiencies even at comparable temperatures.
Alternative embodiments include methods of generating electricity from solar energy. Representative, non-exclusive methods are illustrated in the flow charts of
The foregoing steps 404-412 provide for a Brayton power cycle 414. As described in detail above, the method may optionally include flowing the S-CO2 working fluid to and from a thermal energy storage system to provide thermal energy storage (step 416).
The method of
Various embodiments of the disclosure could also include permutations of the various elements recited in the claims as if each dependent claim was a multiple dependent claim incorporating the limitations of each of the preceding dependent claims as well as the independent claims. Such permutations are expressly within the scope of this disclosure.
While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub combinations thereof. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims and claims hereafter introduced are interpreted to include all such modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations as are within their true spirit and scope.
This application claims the benefit under 35 USC section 119 of U.S. provisional application 61/446,735 filed on Feb. 25, 2011 and entitled “Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle Configurations for Use in Concentrating Solar Power Systems” the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety and for all purposes.
The United States Government has rights in this invention under Contract No. DE-AC36-08G028308 between the United States Department of Energy and the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, the manager and operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61446735 | Feb 2011 | US |