This application is a U.S. National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/EP2009/053357 filed Mar. 23, 2009, which designates the United States of America, and claims priority to German Application No. 10 2008 021 384.5 filed Apr. 29, 2008, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a method for pressure control of a common rail injection system of an internal combustion engine, comprising a high-pressure pump for delivering fuel to a common rail fuel accumulator connected to an injector, a volume control valve which is disposed upstream of the high-pressure pump and with which a volume flow of fuel through said volume control valve into the high-pressure pump can be adjusted, and a pressure control valve downstream of the high-pressure pump, wherein pressure control is performed via a volume control valve (VCV) closed-loop control mode or a pressure control valve (PCV) closed-loop control mode depending on the respective operating point.
The invention also relates to a method for carrying out such a method.
For injecting fuel into combustion chambers of an internal combustion engine, in particular a diesel engine, injection systems are used which in recent years have been increasingly implemented as so-called common rail systems. In these systems, the injectors disposed in the combustion chambers are supplied with fuel from a shared accumulator or common rail, the fuel to be injected being present in the accumulator at a pressure of up to 2000 bar.
Increasingly exacting requirements are being placed on the accuracy of the injection pressure of such injection systems for internal combustion engines which is required for injecting fuel into the engine's combustion chambers. Corresponding pressure control methods are therefore becoming increasingly important.
DE 10 2006 018 164 B3 discloses a method for pressure control of a common rail injection system of the type referred to in the introduction. With this known method, the volume flow of fuel into the high-pressure pump is adjusted using a volume control valve upstream of the high-pressure pump. Pressure control is performed via a pressure control valve disposed downstream of the high-pressure pump. Only one control mode is possible, i.e. either a volume control valve (VCV) closed-loop control mode or a pressure control valve (PCV) closed-loop control mode.
If pressure control is carried out via a volume control valve (VCV) closed-loop control mode as a function of the respective operating point, large overshoots must always be taken into account in transient phases, e.g. on the overrun or in the event of negative setpoint gradients, because the volume control valve or more precisely the high-pressure pump is very sluggish. This is obviously detrimental to the pressure control response.
According to various embodiments, a method of the type referred to in the introduction can be created, with which a particularly good pressure control response can be achieved particularly in the case of dynamic processes.
According to an embodiment, in a method for pressure control of a common rail injection system of an internal combustion engine, comprising a high-pressure pump for delivering fuel to a common rail accumulator connected to an injector, a volume control valve which is disposed upstream of the high-pressure pump and with which a volume flow of fuel through said volume control valve into the high-pressure pump can be adjusted, and a pressure control valve downstream of the high-pressure pump, pressure control is performed via a volume control valve closed-loop control mode or a pressure control valve closed-loop control mode depending on the respective operating point, characterized in that PCV closed-loop control mode is activated and briefly executed as and when required during execution of VCV closed-loop control mode.
According to a further embodiment, PCV closed-loop control mode may normally be deactivated and only operated as offset control during VCV closed-loop control mode. According to a further embodiment, switchover from offset control to PCV closed-loop control mode may take place as and when required during VCV closed-loop control mode.
According to another embodiment, a device for carrying out the method as described above may comprise a pressure control unit which activates and briefly executes PCV closed-loop control mode as and when required during VCV closed-loop control mode.
According to a further embodiment of the device, the pressure control unit deactivates PCV closed-loop control mode and only operates it as offset control during VCV closed-loop control mode. According to a further embodiment of the device, the pressure control unit may switch from offset control to PCV closed-loop control mode as and when required during VCV closed-loop control mode. According to a further embodiment of the device, the pressure control unit may have a common rail pressure coordination block which selects VCV closed-loop control mode or PCV closed-loop control mode depending on an operating point. According to a further embodiment of the device, the pressure control unit may possess a pressure control valve coordination block which switches from offset control to PCV closed-loop control mode and vice versa. According to a further embodiment of the device, the pressure control valve coordination block may have a switch with ramp or exponential transition.
The invention will now be explained in detail with reference to an exemplary embodiment in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
According to various embodiments, pressure control valve (PCV) closed-loop control mode is briefly activated and executed as and when required while volume control valve (VCV) closed-loop control mode is being executed.
In the method according to various embodiments, PCV closed-loop control is therefore briefly activated in VCV closed-loop control mode. This activation does not make the pressure control system unstable, but produces if necessary, particularly in transient phases, a very rapid pressure reduction to the setpoint value, as PCV closed-loop control has a much higher dynamic range than VCV closed-loop control. The method according to various embodiments, therefore enables a particularly good pressure control response to be achieved for dynamic processes.
It is always attempted if possible to control the pressure via the VCV closed-loop control mode. This ensures better energy efficiency of the hydraulic system. According to various embodiments, PCV closed-loop control is activated and briefly executed as and when required during said VCV closed-loop control mode.
Briefly activating PCV closed-loop control in VCV closed-loop control mode does not make the pressure control system unstable.
In an embodiment, during VCV closed-loop control mode, PCV closed-loop control mode is normally deactivated and is only operated as offset control (PCV offset). In this case PCV control therefore only operates open-loop in VCV closed-loop control mode. In this embodiment, switchover from PCV offset to PCV closed-loop control mode takes place as and when required during VCV closed-loop control mode.
According to another embodiment, a device may carry out the method described above. The device has a pressure control unit which activates and briefly executes PCV closed-loop control mode as and when required during VCV closed-loop control mode.
Preferably, the pressure control unit normally deactivates PCV closed-loop control mode during VCV closed-loop control mode and operates it only as open-loop offset control (PCV offset). The pressure control unit switches from PCV offset to PCV closed-loop control mode as and when required during VCV closed-loop control mode and vice versa.
The pressure control unit preferably has a common rail pressure coordination block which selects a VCV closed-loop control mode or a PCV closed-loop control mode depending on an operating point. The pressure control unit also preferably contains a pressure control valve coordination block which switches from PCV offset to PCV closed-loop control mode and vice versa. For this purpose the pressure control unit expediently has a switch with ramp or exponential transition.
The injection system schematically illustrated in
Disposed upstream of the high-pressure pump 3 in a fuel return line 13 is a pressure control valve 4. The returned fuel is fed through the return line 13 back to the fuel tank 7 via a filter 12.
For pressure control of said common rail injection system, a pressure control unit (not shown) is connected which, depending on an operating point, executes either a VCV closed-loop control mode in which the volume control valve 2 is adjusted accordingly, or a PCV closed-loop control mode in which the pressure control valve 4 is adjusted. For this purpose the pressure control unit has a common rail pressure control coordination block 20 which decides, depending on the operating point, which type of control is active. PCV closed-loop control is denoted by 21, while VCV closed-loop control is denoted by 22.
The pressure control unit always endeavors to control the pressure of the injection system via VCV closed-loop control 22. In this mode, PCV control operates in open-loop mode only, i.e. PCV closed-loop control is offset control in this case.
The corresponding switchover from offset control 31 to PCV closed-loop control mode 32 is effected via a switch 35 with ramp or exponential transition.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 021 384 | Apr 2008 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/053357 | 3/23/2009 | WO | 00 | 10/25/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/132898 | 11/5/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5941214 | Hoffmann et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6067963 | Oi et al. | May 2000 | A |
7163001 | Jung et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7389767 | Kasbauer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20060024344 | Matos et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070251506 | Li et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090200865 | Grossner et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100138135 | Hacker et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100269794 | Li et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100275882 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110041808 | Li | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19618932 | Nov 1997 | DE |
10318827 | Feb 2004 | DE |
10318827 | Feb 2004 | DE |
102006018164 | Aug 2007 | DE |
0144638 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0144638 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2005001264 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2009074399 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009132898 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2009/053357 (12 pages), Jul. 17, 2009. |
German Office Action, German Patent application No. 10 2008 021 384.5-13, 2 pages, Feb. 3, 2009. |
Chinese Office Action, Application No. 200980115382.X, 19 pages, Oct. 15, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110041808 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |