Related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/301,872, filed on even date herewith entitled “Auto-Approval of Recovery Actions Based on an Extensible Set of Conditions and Policies,” assigned to the assignee of the present application, is hereby incorporated by reference.
Control over recovery actions in a hosted environment may be provided. Hosted computed environments, such as datacenters, rely on automation to provide high level of service availability and customer data security. However, in some cases manual actions by designated support users are required to restore service availability. Often the user is required to execute a sequence of related commands to resolve the issue. It is important to protect hosted service environment from possible errors in manual user actions or intentional misconduct. Conventional solutions require setting up a granular permission model in the hosted environment wherein support users are delegated with a minimal set of permissions to perform their routine tasks. In the event they need to execute a command that can potentially compromise service availability or customer data security, they have to follow a designated approval process, where commands to be executed must be submitted to high privilege expert decision makers (approvers).
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter. Nor is this Summary intended to be used to limit the claimed subject matter's scope.
Command sequencing may be provided. Upon receiving a plurality of action requests, an ordered queue comprising at least some of the plurality of actions may be created. The actions may then be performed in the queue's order.
Both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description provide examples and are explanatory only. Accordingly, the foregoing general description and the following detailed description should not be considered to be restrictive. Further, features or variations may be provided in addition to those set forth herein. For example, embodiments may be directed to various feature combinations and sub-combinations described in the detailed description.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this disclosure, illustrate various embodiments of the present invention. In the drawings:
The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used in the drawings and the following description to refer to the same or similar elements. While embodiments of the invention may be described, modifications, adaptations, and other implementations are possible. For example, substitutions, additions, or modifications may be made to the elements illustrated in the drawings, and the methods described herein may be modified by substituting, reordering, or adding stages to the disclosed methods. Accordingly, the following detailed description does not limit the invention.
When a user is attempting to remedy a service problem, related action requests may be automatically sequenced in order to streamline their approvals. This may aggregate some duplicative requests, supersede other requests and cancel requests that are not needed. The analysis of a sequence of related commands may also allow the notification, such as by email, to potentially impacted tenants in a multi-tenant environment and make them aware of potential downtime caused by certain changes.
Method 200 may then advance to stage 215 where computing device 300 may determine whether the requested action is a duplicate of an action request already in an action queue. For example, the action queue may already comprise a request to restart the faulty service.
If the requested action is not a duplicate, method 200 may advance to stage 220 where computing device 300 may determine whether the new action request is superseded by an action request already in the action queue. For example, automation framework 110 may determine whether the new action request and the queued action request are each associated with correcting the same fault condition (e.g., the new request may be to modify a configuration for a service for which a request to restart the service is already queued.) For another example, automation framework 110 may determine whether the scope of the new action request falls within the scope of the at least one second action request (e.g., the queued request may comprise a reboot of application server 140(A) while the new request is to restart a service on application server 140(A)).
If the new action is determined to comprise a duplicate action at stage 215, or if the new action is determined to be superseded at stage 220, method 200 may advance to stage 225 where computing device 300 may discard the new action request. Method 200 may then end at stage 260.
Otherwise, method 200 may advance to stage 230 where computing device 300 may determine whether the new action request requires approval. For example, a request to reboot application server 140(A) may require approval from an approval manager 135.
Method 200 may then advance to stage 235 where computing device 300 may determine whether the new action request comprises an activation time. For example, a request to reboot application server 140(A) may comprise a requested execution time of midnight.
If the requested action is determined to require approval at stage 230 or that the activation request comprises a requested execution time at stage 235, method 200 may advance to stage 240 where computing device 300 may hold the new action request out of the action queue. Consistent with embodiments of the invention, computing device 300 may determine whether any already queued actions in the action queue are dependent on the held action request. If so, those actions may be withdrawn from the queue until the held action is released for insertion into the action queue, as described below with respect to stage 245.
Method 200 may then advance to stage 245 where computing device 300 may identify a queue position for the new action request in the action queue. For example, automation framework 110 may consider factors such as a priority of a user associated with the new action request, a sequence number associated with the new action request, and/or a dependency of the new action request upon an already queued action request.
Method 200 may then advance to stage 250 where computing device 300 may insert the new action request into the action queue at the identified queue position. Method 200 may then end at stage 260.
An embodiment consistent with the invention may comprise a system for providing command sequencing. The system may comprise a memory storage and a processing unit coupled to the memory storage. The processing unit may be operative to receive a plurality of action requests, create an ordered queue comprising at least some of the plurality of actions, and perform the actions in order of the queue.
Another embodiment consistent with the invention may comprise a system for providing command sequencing. The system may comprise a memory storage and a processing unit coupled to the memory storage. The processing unit may be operative to receive an action request, identify a sequence priority for the action request according to at least one condition, insert the action request into an action queue comprising a plurality of action requests, and perform at least one first action request of the action queue.
Yet another embodiment consistent with the invention may comprise a system for providing command sequencing. The system may comprise a memory storage and a processing unit coupled to the memory storage. The processing unit may be operative to receive a new action request and determining whether the new action request comprises a duplicate of a queued action request in an action queue or whether the new action request is superseded by a queued action request in the action queue. In case of duplication or superseding by a queued action, the processing unit may be operative to discard the new action request. The processing unit may be further operative to determine whether the new action request requires approval and/or whether the new action request comprises an activation time. In either case, the processing unit may be operative to hold the new action request out of the action queue until approval is received or until the activation time, determine whether an already queued action request in the action queue comprises a dependency on the held action request, and, if so, withdraw the already queued action request from the action queue until the new action is ready to be queued. The processing unit may be further operative to identify a queue position for the new action request in the action queue and insert the new action request into the action queue at the identified queue position.
The embodiments and functionalities described herein may operate via a multitude of computing systems, including wired and wireless computing systems, mobile computing systems (e.g., mobile telephones, tablet or slate type computers, laptop computers, etc.). In addition, the embodiments and functionalities described herein may operate over distributed systems, where application functionality, memory, data storage and retrieval and various processing functions may be operated remotely from each other over a distributed computing network, such as the Internet or an intranet. User interfaces and information of various types may be displayed via on-board computing device displays or via remote display units associated with one or more computing devices. For example user interfaces and information of various types may be displayed and interacted with on a wall surface onto which user interfaces and information of various types are projected. Interaction with the multitude of computing systems with which embodiments of the invention may be practiced include, keystroke entry, touch screen entry, voice or other audio entry, gesture entry where an associated computing device is equipped with detection (e.g., camera) functionality for capturing and interpreting user gestures for controlling the functionality of the computing device, and the like.
With reference to
Computing device 300 may have additional features or functionality. For example, computing device 300 may also include additional data storage devices (removable and/or non-removable) such as, for example, magnetic disks, optical disks, or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in
The term computer readable media as used herein may include computer storage media. Computer storage media may include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. System memory 304, removable storage 309, and non-removable storage 310 are all computer storage media examples (i.e., memory storage.) Computer storage media may include, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store information and which can be accessed by computing device 300. Any such computer storage media may be part of device 300. Computing device 300 may also have input device(s) 312 such as a keyboard, a mouse, a pen, a sound input device, a touch input device, a capture device, etc. A capture device may be operative to record a user and capture spoken words, motions and/or gestures made by the user, such as with a camera and/or microphone. The capture device may comprise any speech and/or motion detection device capable of detecting the speech and/or actions of the user. For example, the capture device may comprise a Microsoft® Kinect® motion capture device comprising a plurality of cameras and a plurality of microphones. Output device(s) 314 such as a display, speakers, a printer, etc. may also be included. The aforementioned devices are examples and others may be used.
The term computer readable media as used herein may also include communication media. Communication media may be embodied by computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” may describe a signal that has one or more characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media may include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared, and other wireless media.
As stated above, a number of program modules and data files may be stored in system memory 304, including operating system 305. While executing on processing unit 302, programming modules 306 may perform processes and/or methods as described above. The aforementioned process is an example, and processing unit 302 may perform other processes. Other programming modules that may be used in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may include electronic mail and contacts applications, word processing applications, spreadsheet applications, database applications, slide presentation applications, drawing or computer-aided application programs, etc.
Generally, consistent with embodiments of the invention, program modules may include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that may perform particular tasks or that may implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, embodiments of the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. Embodiments of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
Furthermore, embodiments of the invention may be practiced in an electrical circuit comprising discrete electronic elements, packaged or integrated electronic chips containing logic gates, a circuit utilizing a microprocessor, or on a single chip containing electronic elements or microprocessors. Embodiments of the invention may also be practiced using other technologies capable of performing logical operations such as, for example, AND, OR, and NOT, including but not limited to mechanical, optical, fluidic, and quantum technologies. In addition, embodiments of the invention may be practiced within a general purpose computer or in any other circuits or systems.
Embodiments of the invention, for example, may be implemented as a computer process (method), a computing system, or as an article of manufacture, such as a computer program product or computer readable media. The computer program product may be a computer storage media readable by a computer system and encoding a computer program of instructions for executing a computer process. The computer program product may also be a propagated signal on a carrier readable by a computing system and encoding a computer program of instructions for executing a computer process. Accordingly, the present invention may be embodied in hardware and/or in software (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.). In other words, embodiments of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-usable or computer-readable storage medium having computer-usable or computer-readable program code embodied in the medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system. A computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be any medium that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
The computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be, for example but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, device, or propagation medium. More specific computer-readable medium examples (a non-exhaustive list), the computer-readable medium may include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, and a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM). Note that the computer-usable or computer-readable medium could even be paper or another suitable medium upon which the program is printed, as the program can be electronically captured, via, for instance, optical scanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted, or otherwise processed in a suitable manner, if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.
Embodiments of the invention may be practiced via a system-on-a-chip (SOC) where each and/or many of the components illustrated above may be integrated onto a single integrated circuit. Such an SOC device may include one or more processing units, graphics units, communications units, system virtualization units and various application functionalities, all of which may be integrated (or “burned”) onto the chip substrate as a single integrated circuit. When operating via an SOC, the functionality, described herein, with respect to training and/or interacting with any component of operating environment 100 may operate via application-specific logic integrated with other components of the computing device/system on the single integrated circuit (chip).
Embodiments of the present invention, for example, are described above with reference to block diagrams and/or operational illustrations of methods, systems, and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. The functions/acts noted in the blocks may occur out of the order as shown in any flowchart. For example, two blocks shown in succession may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.
While certain embodiments of the invention have been described, other embodiments may exist. Furthermore, although embodiments of the present invention have been described as being associated with data stored in memory and other storage mediums, data can also be stored on or read from other types of computer-readable media, such as secondary storage devices, like hard disks, floppy disks, or a CD-ROM, a carrier wave from the Internet, or other forms of RAM or ROM. Further, the disclosed methods' stages may be modified in any manner, including by reordering stages and/or inserting or deleting stages, without departing from the invention.
All rights including copyrights in the code included herein are vested in and the property of the Applicants. The Applicants retain and reserve all rights in the code included herein, and grant permission to reproduce the material only in connection with reproduction of the granted patent and for no other purpose.
While certain embodiments of the invention have been described, other embodiments may exist. While the specification includes examples, the invention's scope is indicated by the following claims. Furthermore, while the specification has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, the claims are not limited to the features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example for embodiments of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5423044 | Sutton et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5564016 | Korenshtein | Oct 1996 | A |
5911143 | Deinhart et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6151643 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6335972 | Chandersekaran et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6678826 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694437 | Pao et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6804773 | Grigsby et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6978367 | Hind et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7205883 | Bailey | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7426654 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7526685 | Noy et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7630480 | Fleck et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7680822 | Vyas et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7698430 | Jackson | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702736 | Ouchi | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7734670 | Poozhiyil et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7831833 | Gaylor | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7950051 | Spitz et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7992008 | Ashok et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8046558 | Ghose | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8201224 | Spertus | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8296827 | Paganetti et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8310923 | Nordstrom et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8438647 | Jevans | May 2013 | B2 |
8458455 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8458779 | Valentine et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20010021926 | Schneck et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020026592 | Gavrila et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035521 | Powers | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020147801 | Gullotta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030115148 | Takhar | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139962 | Nobrega et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050050354 | Gociman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050154744 | Morinville | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193041 | Bourbonnais et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060048224 | Duncan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060137007 | Paatero et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168079 | Shen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184675 | Salmre et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060242690 | Wolf et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265599 | Kanai | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070028293 | Boerries et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070094334 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070124361 | Lowry et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070180100 | Biggs et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185875 | Chang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192416 | Gupta | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070250920 | Lindsay | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070289019 | Lowrey | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294258 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080098485 | Chiou | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103916 | Camarador et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123854 | Peel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140778 | Banavar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154774 | Dennison et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155685 | Beilinson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080195936 | White et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276098 | Florencio et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287121 | Ebrom et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080320310 | Florencio et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090048881 | Keane et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055822 | Tolman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090094667 | Habeck et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090104888 | Cox | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090193407 | Lepeska | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090210427 | Elder et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249284 | Antosz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271451 | Young et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090319402 | Manista et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320107 | Corella | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328023 | Bestland et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011418 | Despain et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017589 | Reed et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023368 | Houba | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100037056 | Follis et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063950 | Joshi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064072 | Tang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087941 | Assaf et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091318 | Ferlitsch | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100188287 | Madsen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100212008 | Jaganathan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100242041 | Plondke et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257579 | Karjoth et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100257596 | Ngo et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278078 | Proulx et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110023107 | Chen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110078497 | Lyne et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110099552 | Avni et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099616 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110126111 | Gill et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110191254 | Womack | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110246426 | Cho | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110247066 | Lee | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252404 | Park et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110289588 | Sahai et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302632 | Garrett et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016621 | Tan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120096306 | Akirav et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120144234 | Clark et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120185911 | Polite et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185933 | Belk et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209884 | Mattsson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239822 | Poulson et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246703 | MacLeod et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120259720 | Nuzzi | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266246 | Amit et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120317132 | Brady et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130024918 | Cramer et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130024947 | Holland et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130111260 | Reddy et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133024 | MacLeod et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130239166 | MacLeod et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140165167 | Nunn et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Chun-Ying Huang et al., Using one-time passwords to prevent password phishing attacks. J Network Computer Applications (2011), doi:10.1016/j.jnca. Feb. 4, 2011, 10 pages. |
Dinei Florencio et al., One-Time Password Access to Any Server without Changing the Server , 11th International conference on Information Security '08, Taipei. Sep. 15, 2009, 16 pages. |
Joseph Bonneau et al., The Quest to Replace Passwords: A Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Web Authentication Schemes, IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), May 20, 2012, 15 pages. |
Lockbox. Printed Nov. 20, 2012. Lockbox: Technology Platform, 3 pgs. lock-box.com/technology-platform/. |
Stoneware. Printed Nov. 21, 2012. Single Sign-on, 3 pgs. stone-ware.com/webnetwork/lenovo/sso. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2013 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,660 26 pgs. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2013 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/301,872, 49 pgs. |
Kadar, et al., “Automatic Classification of Change Requests for Improved IT Service Quality”, In Proceedings of Annual SRII Global Conference, Mar. 29, 2011, pp. 430-439. |
“Deployment Planning, Architecture, and Guidance on System Center Service Manager”, Retrieved on: Oct. 3, 2011, Available at: technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg281359.aspx, 10 pages. |
“Automating IT: SCSM, SCCM, SCOM, SCVMM, Opalis—Better Together”, Retrieved on: Oct. 3, 2011, Available at: blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager/archive/2010/08/25/automating-it-scsm-sccm-scom-scvmm-opalis-better-together.aspx, 1 page. |
“BMC Remedy Change Management 7.0 User's Guide”, Published on: Jun. 2006, Available at: dbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=35595995, 410 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/712,688, filed Dec. 12, 2012, entitled “Scalable and Automated Secret Management”. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 30, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,788 . |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 1, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,660. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 14, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/301,872. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2013 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,078, 46 pgs. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2013 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,788, 27 pgs. |
Kadar, et al, article entitled “Automatic Classification of Change Requests for Improved IT Service Quality”—Published Date: Mar. 29, 2011. In proceedings of Annual SRII Global Conference, Mar. 29, 2011, pp. 430-439. Available at: ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5958118. |
“Automating IT: SCSM, SCCM, SCOM, SCVMM, Opalis—Better Together”—Retrieved Date: Oct. 3, 2011. Available at: blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager/archive/2010/08/25/automating-it-scsm-sccm-scom-scvmm-opalis-better-together.aspx. |
“BMC Remedy Change Management 7.0 User's Guide”—Published Date: Jun. 2006; 410 pages. Available at: idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=35595995. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2013 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,078. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 2, 2013 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,660. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,788, filed Mar. 21, 2011, entitled “Email-Based Automated Recovery Action in a Hosted Environment”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,660, filed Jun. 7, 2011, entitled “Instance-Based Command Execution, Approval, and Notification Framework”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/301,872, filed Nov. 22, 2011, entitled “Auto-Approval of Recovery Actions Based on an Extensible Set of Conditions and Policies”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,078, filed Mar. 6, 2012, entitled “Operating Large Scale Systems and Cloud Service with Zero-Standing Elevated Permissions”. |
Huhns, M., et al.; “Service-Oriented Computing: Key Concepts and Principles”; IEEE Internet Computing Jan./Feb. 2005, IEEE Computer Society; 7 pages. |
Wright, T.; “System Center Service Manager 2010 Release Candidate Released!!”; Microsoft Corporation; Mar. 3, 2010; 3 pages. |
Kaufman, Charlie, et al.; “Windows Azure™ Security Overview”; Published Aug. 2010; 24 pgs., Obtained at: globalfoundationservices.com/security/documents/WindowsAzureSecurityOverview1—0Aug2010.pdf. |
Publication entitled, “PCI DSS Compliance in the UNIX/LINUX Datacenter Environment”; Published Aug. 2009 by BeyondTrust Corporation; 19 pages. Obtained at: http://i.zdnet.com/whitepapers/BeyondTrust—PCIDSSComplianceintheUNIXLinuxDatacenterEnvironment.pdf. |
Master Data Services Environment—Retrieved Date: Oct. 4, 2011, Available at: download.microsoft.com/download/5/9/F/59F1639E-EF57-4915-8848-EF1DC2157EBB/02%20MDS%20Environment.pdf, 16 pages. |
Stanger, Mark; article entitled “Change Management Workflow Approval Scripts in Service-now.com” Published on Oct. 20, 2010. Available at: www.servicenowguru.com/scripting/change-management-workflow-approval-scripts-servicenowcom/, 5 pages. |
“IBM Tivoli Business Continuity Process Manager”—Retrieved Date: Oct. 4, 2011. Available at: www-01.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/business-continuity-process-mgr/features.html, 2 pages. |
“Deployment Planning, Architecture, and Guidance on System Center Service Manager”—Retrieved Date: Oct. 4, 2011. Available at: technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg281359.aspx, 4 pages. |
“Change Management Process” Version 1.0—Published Date: May 1, 2006. Available at: its.uncg.edu/Service—Management/Change/ChangeManagementProcess.pdf, 14 pages. |
Batishchev, Alexander, M. article entitled, “Getting Elevated privileges on Demand Using C#,” published Sep. 9, 2010; 4 pages. Available at: www.codeproject.com/KB/vista-security/ElevatedPrivilegesDemand.aspx. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2014 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,660, 31 pgs. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2013 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,788. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2013 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/712,688. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2014 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,078, 44 pgs. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/301,872, 56 pgs. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated May 20, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,788, 35 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130132963 A1 | May 2013 | US |