This patent application incorporates by reference the entire disclosure of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/342,963, filed on Jun. 9, 2021.
This disclosure relates in general to the field of aircraft, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to managing the distribution of power between a main engine and a supplemental engine and controlling transitions between an auxiliary-power-unit (“APU”) mode and a supplemental-power-unit (“SPU”) mode of the supplemental engine.
This section provides background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the disclosure. It should be understood that the statements in this section of this document are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Some conventional rotorcraft have an auxiliary engine to drive one or more of generators, pumps, or accessories that are shared by a main drive system. It would be advantageous to be able to utilize an auxiliary engine to a main drive system. However, transitioning an auxiliary engine between an auxiliary-power-unit (“APU”) mode and a supplemental-power-unit (“SPU”) mode has been problematic.
A method of operating a multi-engine drive system of an aircraft includes driving a main rotor of the aircraft by a main engine of the multi-engine drive system at an operating speed of the main engine, operating a supplemental engine of the multi-engine drive system at approximately 80% of an operating speed of the supplemental engine, wherein, during the operating step, a clutch interoperably coupled to the supplemental engine is interoperably decoupled from the main rotor and, responsive to a command to interoperably engage the clutch, if the clutch successfully engages such that the clutch is interoperably coupled to the main rotor, providing, by the supplemental engine, power to the main rotor.
A method of operating a multi-engine drive system of an aircraft includes driving a main rotor of the aircraft by a main engine of the multi-engine drive system at an operating speed of the main engine, operating a supplemental engine of the multi-engine drive system at an operating speed of the supplemental engine, wherein, during the operating step, a clutch interoperably coupled to the supplemental engine is interoperably coupled to the main rotor, responsive to a supplemental-engine idle command, reducing a speed of the supplemental engine to approximately 65% of the operating speed of the supplemental engine, the main engine operating at 100% of the operating speed of the main engine and, responsive to a command to disengage the clutch, interoperably decoupling the clutch from the main rotor such that the supplemental engine does not provide power to the main rotor and increasing a speed of the main engine to approximately 100% of the operating speed of the main engine.
A computer system comprising a processor and memory, wherein the processor and the memory in combination are operable to implement a method including driving a main rotor of an aircraft by a main engine of a multi-engine drive system at an operating speed of the main engine, operating a supplemental engine of the multi-engine drive system at approximately 80% of an operating speed of the supplemental engine, wherein, during the operating step, a clutch interoperably coupled to the supplemental engine is interoperably decoupled from the main rotor and, responsive to a command to interoperably engage the clutch, if the clutch successfully engages such that the clutch is interoperably coupled to the main rotor, providing, by the supplemental engine, power to the main rotor.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of claimed subject matter.
The disclosure is best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying figures. It is emphasized that, in accordance with standard practice in the industry, various features are not drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions of various features may be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of discussion.
It is to be understood that the following disclosure provides many different embodiments, or examples, for implementing different features of various illustrative embodiments. Specific examples of components and arrangements are described below to simplify the disclosure. These are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to be limiting. For example, a figure may illustrate an illustrative embodiment with multiple features or combinations of features that are not required in one or more other embodiments and thus a figure may disclose one or more embodiments that have fewer features or a different combination of features than the illustrated embodiment. Embodiments may include some but not all the features illustrated in a figure and some embodiments may combine features illustrated in one figure with features illustrated in another figure. Therefore, combinations of features disclosed in the following detailed description may not be necessary to practice the teachings in the broadest sense and are instead merely to describe particularly representative examples. In addition, the disclosure may repeat reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not itself dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed.
In the specification, reference may be made to the spatial relationships between various components and to the spatial orientation of various aspects of components as the devices are depicted in the attached drawings. However, as will be recognized by those skilled in the art after a complete reading of the present application, the devices, members, apparatuses, etc. described herein may be positioned in any desired orientation. Thus, the use of terms such as “inboard,” “outboard,” “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” or other like terms to describe a spatial relationship between various components or to describe the spatial orientation of aspects of such components should be understood to describe a relative relationship between the components or a spatial orientation of aspects of such components, respectively, as the device described herein may be oriented in any desired direction. As used herein, the terms “connect,” “connection,” “connected,” “in connection with,” and “connecting” may be used to mean in direct connection with or in connection with via one or more elements. Similarly, the terms “couple,” “coupling,” and “coupled” may be used to mean directly coupled or coupled via one or more elements. Conditional language used herein, such as, among others, “can,” “might,” “may,” “e.g.,” and the like, unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or states. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or states are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include such elements or features.
Referring to
The main rotor assembly 12 and the tail rotor assembly 24 receive torque and rotational energy from a main engine 32. The main engine 32 is coupled to a main rotor gearbox 34 by suitable clutching and shafting. The main rotor gearbox 34 is coupled to the main rotor assembly 12 by a mast 36 and is coupled to the tail rotor assembly 24 by a tail rotor drive shaft 38. In the embodiment illustrated in
The supplemental engine 40 is operable as an auxiliary power unit (“APU”) in an APU mode to power accessories of the helicopter 10 such as, for example, electric generators, hydraulic pumps, and the like, as well as to provide power required to start the main engine 32. In addition, the supplemental engine 40 is operable as a supplemental power unit (“SPU”) in an SPU mode to provide supplemental power that is additive to the power provided by the main engine 32.
The helicopter 10 is merely illustrative of a variety of aircraft that can implement the principles disclosed herein. Indeed, the torque-summing powertrain of the present disclosure may be implemented on any rotorcraft. Other aircraft implementations can include hybrid aircraft, tiltwing aircraft, tiltrotor aircraft, quad tiltrotor aircraft, unmanned aircraft, gyrocopters, propeller-driven airplanes, compound helicopters, drones, and the like. As such, those skilled in the art will recognize that the torque-summing powertrain of the present disclosure can be integrated into a variety of aircraft configurations. It should be appreciated that, even though aircraft are particularly well-suited to implement principles of the present disclosure, non-aircraft vehicles and devices can also implement the principles disclosed herein.
Referring also to
In the illustrated embodiment, the main rotor gearbox 106 is coupled to the sprag clutch 104 via a suitable drive shaft. In addition, the main rotor gearbox 106 is coupled to the main rotor 108 by a suitable mast. The main rotor gearbox 106 includes a gearbox housing and a plurality of gears, such as planetary gears, used to adjust the engine output to a suitable rotational speed so that the main engine 102 and the main rotor 108 may each rotate at optimum speed during flight operations of the helicopter 10. The main rotor gearbox 106 may be coupled to a tail rotor gearbox 110 via a suitable tail rotor drive shaft. The tail rotor gearbox 110 includes a gearbox housing and a plurality of gears that may adjust the main rotor gearbox output to a suitable rotational speed for operation of the tail rotor 112. The main engine 102, the sprag clutch 104, the main rotor gearbox 106, and the tail rotor gearbox 110, as well as the various shafts and gearing systems coupled therewith are shown as a main drive system 109 of the torque-summing powertrain 100.
The torque-summing powertrain 100 includes a supplemental engine 114, such as, for example, a turboshaft engine capable of producing 200 to 600 horsepower or more, depending upon the particular implementation. In the illustrated embodiment, the supplemental engine 114 may generate between about 5% and about 20% of the horsepower of the main engine 102. In other embodiments, the supplemental engine 114 may generate between about 10% and about 15% of the horsepower of the main engine 102. The supplemental engine 114 is coupled to a freewheeling unit depicted as a sprag clutch 116 that acts as a one-way clutch enabling a driving mode, wherein torque from the supplemental engine 114 is coupled through the sprag clutch 116 from the input side to the output side. The sprag clutch 116 has an overrunning mode in which the supplemental engine 114 is decoupled from torque transfer with the sprag clutch 116 when the input side rotating speed of the sprag clutch 116 is less than the output side rotating speed of the sprag clutch 116. Operating the sprag clutch 116 in the overrunning mode allows, for example, the main engine 102 to drive the rotorcraft accessories such as one or more generators 118, one or more hydraulic pumps 120, or other accessories 122 when the supplemental engine 114 is not operating. The supplemental engine 114 and the sprag clutch 116 as well as the various shafts and gearing systems coupled therewith may be considered a secondary drive system of the torque-summing powertrain 100.
Disposed between the main drive system 109 and the secondary drive system of the torque-summing powertrain 100 is a selectable clutch assembly 124 that has a unidirectional torque transfer mode and a bidirectional torque transfer mode. In the unidirectional torque transfer mode of the selectable clutch assembly 124, torque can be driven from the main drive system 109 to the secondary drive system of the torque-summing powertrain 100 but torque cannot be driven from the secondary drive system to the main drive system 109 of the torque-summing powertrain 100. In the bidirectional torque transfer mode of the selectable clutch assembly 124, torque can be driven from the main drive system 109 to the secondary drive system of the torque-summing powertrain 100 and torque can be driven from the secondary drive system to the main drive system 109 of the torque-summing powertrain 100. In the illustrated embodiment, the selectable clutch assembly 124 includes a freewheeling unit depicted as a sprag clutch 126 and a bypass assembly 128. The sprag clutch 126 acts as a one-way clutch enabling a driving mode, wherein torque from the main drive system 109 is coupled through the sprag clutch 126 from the input side to the output side. The sprag clutch 126 also has an overrunning mode wherein the main drive system 109 is decoupled from torque transfer with the sprag clutch 126 when the input side rotating speed of the sprag clutch 126 is less than the output side rotating speed of the sprag clutch 126. When the overrunning mode of the sprag clutch 126 is enabled, the selectable clutch assembly 124 is in the unidirectional torque transfer mode. The overrunning mode of the selectable clutch assembly 124 can be disabled by engaging the bypass assembly 128 with the sprag clutch 126. When the bypass assembly 128 prevents the sprag clutch 126 from operating in the overrunning mode, the selectable clutch assembly 124 is in the bidirectional torque transfer mode.
When the main engine 102 is operating, torque is delivered through the main drive system 109 as indicated by the solid lines and arrowheads between the components within the main drive system 109. In addition, as the main drive system 109 is turning, torque may be applied to the selectable clutch assembly 124. As discussed herein, in order to shift the selectable clutch assembly 124 from the unidirectional torque transfer mode to the bidirectional torque transfer mode, power should be applied to the input side of the sprag clutch 126 from the main drive system 109 such that the input side and the output side of the sprag clutch 126 are turning together. The bypass assembly 128 can now be actuated from the disengaged position to the engaged position, placing the selectable clutch assembly 124 in the bidirectional torque transfer mode. The operations of engaging and disengaging the bypass assembly 128 may be pilot controlled and/or may be automated by the flight control computer of the helicopter 10 and may be determined according to the operating conditions of the helicopter 10. In this configuration, power from the supplemental engine 114 augments the power of the main engine 102 within the main drive system 109, as indicated by the solid lines and arrowhead from the selectable clutch assembly 124 to the main drive system 109. This configuration may be referred to as the enhanced power configuration of the torque-summing powertrain 100 wherein the main engine 102 and the supplemental engine 114 are operating together and the selectable clutch assembly 124 is in the bidirectional torque transfer mode. The selectable clutch assembly 124 may be engaged and additive supplemental power applied to the main rotor during normal operations in which the load that on the main engine is sufficient to govern the rotor speed. For example, the selectable clutch assembly 124 may not be engaged if the supplemental power would reduce the load on the main engine below that under which the main engine can govern rotor speed. Aspects of the torque-summing powertrain 100 are disclosed in US Patent App. Publication No. 2020/0248760, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Referring now also to
The system 300 is particularly well-suited for implementation in aircraft having a fly-by-wire flight control computer, such as a flight control computer 325; however, non-fly-by-wire aircraft can also utilize the system 300. For example, the system 300 can be utilized in a flight control system having collective actuators that can receive commands from a trim motor, autopilot system, or any other system that allows collective commands to be realized by collective actuators. Further, the system 300 is particularly well suited for implementation with aircraft having engines controlled by an engine control unit 327, such as a FADEC (full authority digital engine control) system. However, the system 300 can also be implemented on an aircraft having an engine that is not controlled by an engine control unit such as the engine control unit 327; in such an embodiment, the system 300 can make fuel control commands directly to a fuel control unit 329, for example. The system 300 is preferably integrated with a flight control computer 325; however, in another embodiment, the system 300 can be a standalone computer system within the aircraft.
The system 300 can include a processor 303 configured for processing receivable data in one or more algorithms 350 for calculating total power demand, supplemental power demands, and subsequently making commands, e.g., a main engine speed command, and supplemental engine power command, to adaptively affect rotor speed. The processor 303 can receive real time operational data from sensors, instrumentation, and the like. The processor 303 can receive real time data pertaining to a measured gas temperature (MGT) 305, engine torque (Qe) 307, main-engine gas-generator speed and supplemental-engine gas generator speed (Ng, Ngs) 309 approximating power, and main rotor speed (Nr) 311, which corresponds to main-engine power-turbine speed (Np). Allowable engine limits for each of the main and the supplemental engine, such as measure gas temperature (MGT) limit 313, main-engine gas-generator speed and supplemental-engine gas generator speed (Ng, Ngs) limits 317, as well as a torque (Qe) limit 315, are in data communication with processor 303. Allowable engine limits 313, 317, and torque limit 315, can be stored in a database within the processor 303, or can be stored remotely, as long as limits 313, 315, and 317 are available for analysis. The processor 303 is configured to perform analysis using one or more algorithms and subsequently issue supplemental engine power commands 319 and a main engine speed command 321.
The main engine 102 and the supplemental engine 114 are different sizes, i.e., different horsepower ratings, and may be from different manufacturers. The system 300 is configured to separately control the main engine 102 and the supplemental engine 114 to supply total power required to maintain the main rotor speed within an acceptable range. The system 300 controls the main engine 102 to govern the main rotor speed (Nr), for example in similar manner as with a conventional single engine or twin-engine powertrain. The system 300 implements the supplemental engine 114 power control via an Ngs (supplemental-engine gas generator speed) command to provide a proportion of the total power demand, which is subtracted from the main engine 102 power compensation command. The supplemental engine 114 only receives a supplemental power demand and does not respond to changes in rotor speed. The system 300 facilitates operating the supplemental engine 114 in the enhanced power configuration when the proportion of the total power demand of the main engine 102 is sufficient for the main rotor speed to be governed by the main engine 102.
A system computed main engine power compensation command is used to adjust the power output of the main engine to reduce rotor speed variation in response to load variations. The main engine power compensation command may be calculated by the system anticipating the power demand on the engine and transmitting the main engine power compensation command to the governor on the main engine to adjust the power output of the main engine. Non-limiting illustrative methods and systems for governing rotor speed are disclosed in US Patent Application Publication Nos. 2014/0252158, 2014/0363288, and 2018/0222597, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The system controls the supplemental engine to provide a proportion of the total power demand. The supplemental engine provides power in response to a system computed supplemental engine power demand signal, effectively decoupling the dynamics of the main engine and the supplemental engine. The main engine power compensation command is adjusted to account for the supplemental engine power demand. The supplemental engine power demand can be computed as a function of control inputs and flight conditions or in proportion to the total power demand. The supplemental engine power demand may be computed per schedule and limits.
Referring also to
The supplemental engine 506 works to satisfy a power demand as opposed to the main engine 504 which works to satisfy an RPM demand. Total power demand 512 is calculated for what the rotorcraft 500 is currently doing and is routed toward the main engine 504 as the power compensation command. A portion of total power demand 512 is allocated to the supplemental engine 506, as a supplemental engine power demand 514, based on logic 516 (e.g., schedules and limits). Different techniques can be used to control the supplemental engine 506. For example, the supplemental engine power demand 514 may be supplemental-engine gas generator speed (Ngs) based (demanding Ngs is proportional to power), measured gas temperature (MGT) based (demanding a temperature), fuel flow (WF) based (demanding a rate of fuel flow), or engine torque (Qe) based (demanding a torque). Ambient correction and low frequency closed-loop correction may be applied to reduce errors, if necessary.
To mitigate supplemental engine power 506a from being perceived by the main engine 504 as a disturbance, supplemental engine power demand 514 is subtracted at block 518 from total power demand 512, resulting in main engine power compensation command 510.
The schedules are built to achieve certain attributes. For example, and without limitation, the supplemental engine should be at maximum power when regard for efficiency in some flight envelopes and for safety. The supplemental power demand is forced to maximum power for autorotation if the main engine fails or due to rotor speed droop, which is indicative of a main engine failure. In low-power conditions, the supplemental engine power demand is reduced to ensure adequate load remains on the main engine so that it can continue to govern rotor speed. A low limit may be placed on the supplemental engine power demand to ensure that the supplemental engine sprag clutch, e.g., the clutch 126 of the selectable clutch 124, remains engaged. The high limit takes priority over the low limit during normal operation when the main engine is controlling rotor speed. Limits, gains, and other parameters can be varied with flight condition to optimize performance. Supplemental-engine limiting loops, such as MGT, Ngs, and Qe, may be utilized, and the system control algorithm adjusts when the limiting loops are active. The supplemental engine power demand control may have a supplemental-engine power-turbine speed (Nps) loop in case of overspeed, for example approximately 3%, to switch the supplemental engine to rotor speed (RPM) command to avoid increasing the rotor overspeed.
In a typical embodiment, the supplemental engine (e.g., the supplemental engine 114) is able to be started, brought to idle RPM and power, brought to operating RPM and power, and shut down regardless of the operating state of the main engine and regardless of whether or not the supplemental engine is interoperably coupled to the main drive system. Various embodiments permit automatic-control speed and power commands of the supplemental engine to and from APU mode and SPU mode, prevent a pilot from commanding damaging transitions between APU mode and SPU mode, and provide pilot awareness of an operating state of the supplemental engine.
In the APU mode, the supplemental engine is not mechanically coupled to the main drive system. In the APU mode, the supplemental engine may be commanded by the pilot, for example, to enter an OFF state, an IDLE state (e.g., approximately 65% RPM), or a RUN state (e.g., approximately 80% RPM). In the RUN state, the APU may be commanded to a reduced operating power.
In the SPU mode, the supplemental engine is mechanically coupled to the main drive system. In the SPU mode, the supplemental engine may be commanded by the pilot, for example, to the OFF state, an IDLE state (e.g., approximately 65% RPM), or a RUN state. In the RUN state, variable RPM and power can be commanded in accordance with flight conditions and design constraints.
Typical aircraft startup procedures require that the supplemental engine be in APU mode in order for the supplemental engine to power generators used to start the main engine. In such cases, the main engine is then transitioned from OFF to a main-engine IDLE state (approximately 70% Nr), then to a main-engine FLY state (approximately 100% Nr). In a typical embodiment, accessories initially powered by the supplemental engine become powered by the main engine during this transition, which serves to remove the accessory load from the supplemental engine such that the supplemental engine automatically transitions to a STANDBY state.
In a typical embodiment, the pilot is provided visual indication of the operating mode of the supplemental engine (e.g., APU mode or SPU mode) and the state of the supplemental engine (e.g., OFF, IDLE, RUN, STANDBY, or AUTOROTATION), combined into text such as “APU OFF” or “SPU RUN.” In some embodiments, the pilot is provided with push-button engine controls for supplemental engine ON/OFF, supplemental engine IDLE/RUN, and supplemental engine clutch control.
Transition from APU mode to SPU mode couples the supplemental engine to the main drive system through engagement of a spline clutch. In a typical embodiment, to prevent damage to the spline clutch, decoupling of the supplemental engine from the main drive system is performed when the supplemental engine provides no power to the main drive system.
Engagement of the spline clutch requires alignment of spline teeth with the supplemental-engine gearbox. Spline engagement is controlled by an actuator connected to the spline through a spring. The spring allows full actuator engagement even if spline misalignment prevents spline engagement. Clutch engagement may be manual or automatic. In an embodiment in which manual clutch engagement is employed, interlocks are provided to preclude inappropriate clutch engagement and disengagement.
During transition from APU mode to SPU mode, full extension of the actuator results in the system commanding an automatic speed profile from an APU-mode speed of approximately 80% to slightly above a main drive system speed, then back to slightly below the main drive system speed. This process is intended to cause engagement of the spline teeth if not already engaged. If successful, the splines will fully engage, and the supplemental engine will transition to SPU Mode. If unsuccessful, the supplemental engine is returned to APU mode, and the pilot can de-select and re-select the clutch to re-attempt spline engagement. Once the supplemental engine is in SPU mode, disengagement of the spline causes the supplemental engine to be transitioned to APU mode.
Responsive to a supplemental-engine ON command, execution proceeds to state 704, at which state the supplemental engine enters into a state referred to as APU_Pre Start. In state 704, Ngs increases from 0% to less than or equal to approximately 20% of operating speed and SC remains disengaged. In a typical embodiment, Ngs is in a state indicative that it is safe to operate the starter and a starter moves Ngs from approximately 0% to approximately 20%.
Responsive to a supplemental-engine START command, execution proceeds from state 704 to state 706, which state is designated APU_Start, in which Ngs is increased to less than or equal to approximately 50% of operating speed and SC remains disengaged. The starter is also utilized to move Ngs from approximately 20% to less than or equal to approximately 50%.” From state 706, execution may proceed to state 708 or state 710. Execution proceeds to state 710 if a supplemental-engine RUN command is selected. Execution proceeds to state 708 if a supplemental-engine IDLE command is selected. In a typical embodiment, the pilot may select the supplemental-engine RUN command, in which case transitioning directly from state 706 to state 710 will occur, or may select the supplemental-engine RUN command after the supplemental-engine IDLE command has been selected, state 708 has been reached, and then select the supplemental-engine RUN command from state 708.
At state 708, which state is designated APU_Idle, supplemental-engine power-turbine speed (Nps) is increased to approximately 65% of operating speed, main-engine rotor speed (Nr) and main-engine power turbine speed (Np) are at 0% of operating speeds, and SC remains disengaged. From state 708, execution proceeds to state 710. At state 710, which state is designated APU_Run, Nps is increased to 80% of operating speed, Nr and Np remain at 0% of operating speeds, and SC remains disengaged.
From state 710, responsive to a command for the main engine (e.g., the main engine 102) to enter into a main-engine IDLE state, execution proceeds to state 712. At state 712, which state is referred to as Main Engine_Idle, Nps remains at approximately 80% of operating speed, Nr and Np are increased to less than approximately 80% of operating speed, and SC remains disengaged. From state 712, responsive to a command for the main engine to enter into a FLY state, execution proceeds to state 714. At state 714, which state is referred to as APU_STBY, both Nr and Np are increased to approximately 100% of operating speed, Nps remains at approximately 80% of operating speed, and SC remains disengaged. APU_STBY is a preparatory state for the supplemental engine to enter into SPU mode.
From state 714, execution proceeds to state 716 or state 718. If, at state 714, responsive to a supplemental-engine clutch-in command, SC (e.g., sprag clutch 126) is able to engage the main drive system such that the main drive system can be driven by the supplemental engine as well as by the main engine, execution proceeds to state 716, which state is designated SPU_Run, at which state Np, Nps, and Nr are identical, Ngs is transitioned to a value scheduled by the flight control computer so as to provide required supplemental power.
However, if, at state 714, responsive to the supplemental-engine command to clutch in, SC (e.g., sprag clutch 126) is not able to engage the main drive system such that the main drive system can be driven by the supplemental engine as well as by the main engine, execution proceeds to state 718, which state is designated Clutch Assist, at which state Np and Nr remain at approximately 100% of operating speed, Nps is varied from approximately 80% to approximately 102% of operating speed, and SC is disengaged. The RPM manipulation at state 718 is to cause relative angular motion between male and female parts of the spline clutch so that the splines are able to align, thereby allowing the spline clutch to engage. At states 714-718, the main engine is in Fly mode. When the main engine is in the Fly mode, the engine governs a main rotor of an aircraft to an Np reference. In
As noted above, transition of the supplemental engine from APU mode to SPU mode couples the supplemental engine to the main drive system through engagement of a spline clutch (e.g., sprag clutch 126). If SC engagement is successful, execution proceeds from state 718 to state 716. If SC engagement is not successful, Clutch Assist may be repeated in response to an additional command to do so.
From state 802, response to a supplemental-engine command to CLUTCH OUT (i.e., disengage SC), execution proceeds to state 804, which state is designated APU_Idle, at which state Nps remains approximately 65% of operating speed, Np and Nr are approximately 100% of operating speed, and SC is disengaged. From state 804, responsive to a supplemental-engine Run command, execution proceeds to state 806, which state is designated APU_STBY, at which state Nr and Np remain at approximately 100% of operating speed, Nps is increased to approximately 80%, and SC remains disengaged. At states 716 and 802-806, the main engine is in Fly mode. When the main engine is in the Fly mode, the engine governs a main rotor of an aircraft to an Np reference. In
From state 806, responsive to a main-engine command to bring the main engine to IDLE, execution proceeds to state 808, at which state Nr and Np are reduced to less than approximately 80% of operating speed, Nps remains at approximately 80% of operating speed, and SC remains disengaged. From state 808, responsive to a main-engine OFF command, execution proceeds to state 810, which state is designated APU_Run and is identical to state 710 of
Although various commands have been described herein as being pilot-initiated, those having skill in the art that any of the commands can be initiated by the pilot or by an FCC or other avionics, either onboard or remote from the aircraft, without departing from principles disclosed herein. The terms “substantially,” “approximately,” “approximately”, and “about” is defined as largely but not necessarily wholly what is specified (and includes what is specified; e.g., “substantially 90 degrees” includes 90 degrees and “substantially parallel” includes parallel), as understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art. The extent to which the description may vary will depend on how great a change can be instituted and still have a person of ordinary skill in the art recognized the modified feature as still having the required characteristics and capabilities of the unmodified feature. In general, but subject to the preceding, a numerical value herein that is modified by a word of approximation such as “substantially,” “approximately,” and “about” may vary from the stated value, for example, by 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, or 15 percent.
The foregoing outlines features of several embodiments so that those skilled in the art may better understand the aspects of the disclosure. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that they may readily use the disclosure as a basis for designing or modifying other processes and structures for carrying out the same purposes and/or achieving the same advantages of the embodiments introduced herein. Those skilled in the art should also realize that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the disclosure and that they may make various changes, substitutions, and alterations without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. The scope of the invention should be determined only by the language of the claims that follow. The term “comprising” within the claims is intended to mean “including at least” such that the recited listing of elements in a claim are an open group. The terms “a,” “an” and other singular terms are intended to include the plural forms thereof unless specifically excluded.
This invention was made with government support under Agreement No. W911W6-19-9-0002, awarded by the U.S. Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
204085 | Rabbeth | May 1878 | A |
4338525 | Kilgore | Jul 1982 | A |
5915917 | Eveker et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923515 | Eubanks et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6010303 | Feulner | Jan 2000 | A |
6059522 | Gertz et al. | May 2000 | A |
6198238 | Edelson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6729139 | Desai et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6986641 | Desai et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7540450 | Brand et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7827803 | Wadia et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7939962 | Foch et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8080950 | Beck et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8274803 | Swamy et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8324746 | Bradbrook | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8355855 | Minto et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8562284 | Bradbrook | Oct 2013 | B2 |
9156560 | Burns et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9193453 | Vallart et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9270219 | Lando et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9428267 | DeVita et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9821908 | Schaeffer et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10260471 | Huang | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10392119 | Niergarth et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10435165 | Swann et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10436059 | Liu et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10442547 | Miller et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10487733 | Morgan | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10696416 | Gansler et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10711693 | Miller et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10730633 | Anghel et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10738706 | Gansler et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10788088 | Olson et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10793284 | Prater et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10953995 | Gansler et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11130456 | Klemen et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11196585 | Auerbach et al. | Dec 2021 | B1 |
11447015 | Wiegman et al. | Sep 2022 | B1 |
11473496 | Romero et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11682535 | Maragni et al. | Jun 2023 | B2 |
11688568 | Maragni et al. | Jun 2023 | B2 |
20030094001 | Desai et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050225303 | Xu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20100013300 | Lando | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100138089 | James | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148719 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110080040 | Kumar | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120227389 | Hinderks | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130086919 | Dooley et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094963 | Rolt | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130169036 | Todd et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130247579 | Morawski et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140084677 | Haillot | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140252158 | Schaeffer | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140290208 | Rechain et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140333127 | Edwards | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140363288 | Schaeffer et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150151844 | Anton et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150274306 | Sheridan | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150283908 | Himmelmann | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150333527 | Rideau et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150345403 | Cai et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150367950 | Rajashekara et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160036220 | Lacaux et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160046247 | Rozman et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160069277 | Meisner et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160236790 | Knapp et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160325826 | Swann | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160355272 | Moxon | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380437 | Casimir et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170044989 | Gemin et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170057650 | Walter-Robinson | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170066541 | Rossotto | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170129617 | Shah et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170175565 | Sennoun | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170184032 | Poumarede et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170225794 | Waltner | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170226933 | Klonowski et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170291712 | Himmelmann et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170294782 | Navarro | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170297695 | Schaeffer et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180002025 | Lents et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180065755 | Teicholz et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180079515 | Harwood et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180141671 | Anghel et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180141674 | Bailey et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180187604 | Poumarede et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180194483 | Schwöller | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180222597 | Covington et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180319283 | Battin et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180354631 | Adibhatla et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180354632 | Hon et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180370646 | Hon et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190000195 | Golay et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190003397 | Gansler et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190003398 | Gibson et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190155282 | Kim | May 2019 | A1 |
20190165708 | Smith et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190186284 | Orkiszewski | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190345837 | Bacic | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190368500 | Epstein | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200056546 | Terwilliger et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200056551 | Epstein | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200079513 | Pastouchenko et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200095939 | Epstein | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200164975 | Robertson | May 2020 | A1 |
20200182158 | Kupratis | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200248619 | Romero et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200248760 | Olson et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200284265 | Reepmeyer et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200408148 | Beauchesne-Martel | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210246837 | Romero et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20220063824 | Hiett et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220063826 | Hiett et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220065175 | McQuiston et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220065177 | McQuiston et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220251966 | Hiett et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220252007 | Hiett et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20240017823 | Parsons et al. | Jan 2024 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3693271 | Aug 2020 | EP |
WO-2016049030 | Mar 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Covington, Charles Eric, et al.; “Supplemental Engine Power Control”; U.S. Appl. No. 17/342,963, filed Jun. 9, 2021; 43 pages. |
Parsons, Thomas Dewey, et al.; “Optimizing Usage of Supplemental Engine Power”; U.S. Appl. No. 17/867,231, filed Jul. 18, 2022; 60 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230331392 A1 | Oct 2023 | US |