Applicants claim priority under 35 U.S.C. section.119 of Brazilian Application No. PI 090.4780-8 filed Sep. 17, 2009.
More specifically, this Invention has as its most important characteristic the form and innovative methods without mobile parts for the green coke to be introduced by a substantially continuous flow and by a simple free fall on the entrance spot of a rotating furnace, so that inside the rotating furnace the calcination can take place.
Currently, the green coke feeding at the entrance or initial end of the rotating furnace is made through mobile parts traditionally known as “scoop feeder”, where a component rotates concentrically with the rotating furnace and performs the role of a scoop transporter, so that the coke falling from a transporting mat can be collected in continuous dosages (scoops) and, thereon, it is unloaded in a controlled and homogeneous form to the initial part of the collective furnace.
There is no doubt that the technology of the status of technique presents means for the green coke of the oil to feed properly a rotating furnace; however, along the years it has become noticeable that this technology could be changed, not only with the aim of improving the coke's calcinating process, but also with the aim of speeding up the process and reduce its cost, especially regarding construction and any maintenance, both preventive and corrective.
In light of circumstances above and aiming at overcoming them, this invention was created to, in general lines, be a new constructive concept specially created to eliminate the mobile parts inside the furnace, meaning: replace the traditional “scoop feeder” system for a feeding set without any mobile parts; in addition, this set, unlike the usual, has no parts assembled to the peripherals of the rotating furnace, consequentially releasing and making productive this area which was previously occupied by the conventional device used for the same purpose, thus providing for substantial technical and practical advantages, such as: stability of the coke bed in the inside of the calcinating furnace; increased useful length of the furnace, and consequentially an increased time for residence of the material within the calcinator; reduced heating rate; reduced particulate material dragged; reduced maintenance items; and reduced reflux of green coke inside the calcinator.
This invention and its advantages, as well as the previous techniques, will be better understood through the detailed description which is made below, together with the attached drawings:
As it is well known to the ones familiar with this technique, the calcinated oil coke is an important input used for the production of primary aluminum, and thus is intended to carry the electric current for the electrolytic reaction of alumina dissociation for the aluminum production. Most of the production of oil calcinated coke in the world is made by rotating furnaces.
After the calcinating process, the coke is discharged through the discharge breadth (10) into a rotating cooler (13), schematically mounted in
In counterflow to the coke inside the calcinator there is a large gaseous mass, composed of several substances resulting from the cracking of volatile material in the green coke, humidity, dragged sharps and air injected inside the calcinator.
The release of humidity and heating of the coke takes place in the range of 25 to 400.degree. C., and the devolatization takes place in the range of 500 to 1000.degree. C.; the coke densification and burn of a small quantity of carbon takes place between 1200 and 1400.degree. C.
The sharps dragged during the process are considered as a subproduct of low added value, and their generation and transport depend on several associated factors during the calcination.
Therefore, the furnace (1) and the cooler (13) are apart of a system to calcinate the green coke of oil. This system is generically illustrated in
The improvements made comprise the whole sets involved in the feeding system of the coke until the silo (25) interior and until the interior of the rotating furnace (1), meaning: feed mat (24) of the silo (25); silo (25) which can be a green coke silo; removal of the material from the silo (25), transportation (26) of the green coke until the rotating furnace (1), green coke discharging system in the interior of the rotating furnace (1) and (f) draggers of green coke inside the calcinating furnace;
As per illustrated by
Still regarding
The walls of the silo (25) received longitudinal bars for structural reinforcement of the silo, with the aim of supporting the load levels.
As per illustrated in
Under the discharge breadth of an intermediate nozzle (33), such as illustrated by
With the introduction of the fall set to the interior of the calcinating rotating furnace (1), the need of extension of the current mat transporter was evident, but since this was not possible, a second transporter was placed at the main unloading point of the mat transporter, and this to unload from the feeding set (35) at last on the fall set (36).
The fall set (36) is illustrated with details in
The material discharge fall tube (37) presents that angle and dimensions allowing for a proper unloading of the material to the inside of the rotating furnace (1), providing a low loss of load on the gas side and a minimum solid reflux inside the rotating furnace (1). The dragging wings (40) are naturally the main components for eliminating the coke reflux in a contrary direction to the rotating furnace (1) inclination, since they are combined with the fall tube (37) to characterize an uniform unloading, followed by a equally uniform movement, pushing the material to the front of the fall tube.
With the improvements of this invention, several technical and practical advantages are obtained, both in the functioning of the set and in the calcination process of the oil green coke. Such advantages in general overcome the conventional systems, which have no means to increase the length of the calcinating furnace; this is not a problem for this invention, where the introduced improvements allowed for a significantly better functioning and installation process, since with the removal of the scoop feeder system, a series of advantageous improvements was observed, such as: a) when the scoop feeder was removed, it was possible to significantly increase the useful length of the rotating furnace and consequentially improve the time during which the material stays inside the furnace, allowing for gains in the calcination process, especially regarding quality, speed and quantity of the processed material, all of which also contributed to a reduced power consumption; b) stability of the coke bed inside the calcinating furnace; c) reduced heating rate; d) reduced dragging of particulate material; e) considerable reduced maintenance procedures, whether both preventive and corrective, since there was a strong reduction of components; and f) reduced reflux of green coke inside the calcinator,
It will be understood that certain characteristics and combinations of constructive details of the furnace, the cooler, the silo, as well as mat transport units may radically vary, maintaining the same functional concept for the calcination process of the green coke, and thus we can observe that the construction described in details for example of the whole set are clearly subject to constructive variations; however, always within the scope of the inventive scope hereunder of a feeding system with the breadth or entrance end of the rotating furnace defined by a fall tube and dragging winds, completely eliminating the old scoop feeder system; and since many changes can be made to the configuration detailed hereunder according to requirements of the law, it is understood that details hereunder should be interpreted in illustrative and not limiting manner.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0904780 | Sep 2009 | BR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1620989 | Agthe | Mar 1927 | A |
2026441 | Bernhard et al. | Dec 1935 | A |
2036578 | Keyes | Apr 1936 | A |
2160956 | Cheesman | Jun 1939 | A |
2402457 | Smith | Jun 1946 | A |
2813822 | Collier | Nov 1957 | A |
2831759 | Osborn | Apr 1958 | A |
2973191 | Sackett, Jr. | Feb 1961 | A |
3006816 | Finney | Oct 1961 | A |
3136321 | Davis | Jun 1964 | A |
3362857 | Stewart | Jan 1968 | A |
3511643 | Vallak Enn et al. | May 1970 | A |
3514280 | Sherwood | May 1970 | A |
3542350 | Sherwood | Nov 1970 | A |
3558114 | Saeman | Jan 1971 | A |
3575397 | McDowell et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3814406 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3920381 | Heinemann | Nov 1975 | A |
3921831 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3938449 | Frisz et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3950143 | Pyle | Apr 1976 | A |
4092094 | Lingl, Jr. | May 1978 | A |
4176010 | Dudek et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4198273 | Dudek et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4363571 | Jackson et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4400154 | Lientz | Aug 1983 | A |
4405137 | Webb | Sep 1983 | A |
4454827 | Smith et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4494984 | Calderon | Jan 1985 | A |
4502702 | Nixon, Jr. | Mar 1985 | A |
4543061 | Edwards | Sep 1985 | A |
4572086 | Ladt et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4588429 | Hohman et al. | May 1986 | A |
4630975 | Becker | Dec 1986 | A |
4724777 | Reed et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4846053 | Lane et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4943367 | Nixon et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4961588 | Brienza | Oct 1990 | A |
5028299 | Guidat et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5258101 | Breu | Nov 1993 | A |
5422861 | Stringer et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5476990 | Hittner et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5543061 | Baskis | Aug 1996 | A |
5555823 | Davenport | Sep 1996 | A |
5571269 | Buelow | Nov 1996 | A |
5606534 | Stringer et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5616296 | Hittner et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642601 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5711018 | Hittner et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5850370 | Stringer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855742 | Lumbroso et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5913677 | Von Beckmann | Jun 1999 | A |
6013158 | Wootten | Jan 2000 | A |
6064629 | Stringer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6171499 | Bouchalat | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6298009 | Stringer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6470812 | Arroyave-Garcia et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7384181 | Collette | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7686612 | Buteau | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7993048 | Collette et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
20020082802 | Stringer et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020134550 | Leeson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030024806 | Foret | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030164235 | Leeson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050051066 | May et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050166810 | Gnedenko et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060096837 | Sanders | May 2006 | A1 |
20060107587 | Bullinger et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060169181 | Youn et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070007198 | Balvanz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070227874 | Wolf-Eberhard et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080072806 | Kimberlin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080201980 | Bullinger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209807 | Tsangaris et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080210089 | Tsangaris et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090236766 | Rust et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100141013 | Lahr | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100275781 | Tsangaris et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110036014 | Tsangaris et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110065059 | Brandao et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120067789 | Bullinger et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130133560 | Laskowski et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140141381 | Bullinger et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110065057 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |