The invention relates to a load-bearing construction with at least one load-bearing element according to the preamble of claim 1.
The load-bearing construction can be a high-rise building, a chimney, a tower or a bridge, for example.
A load-bearing construction is made up of load-bearing elements such as, for instance, rods, beams, panels or plates. A load-bearing construction in the area of application of construction engineering has at least one support bed. Serving as support bed can be site or foundation structures.
In load-bearing constructions, vibrations can be brought about by dynamic influences (earthquake, wind, pedestrians on bridges, etc.). There are various methods of reducing vibrations:
Changing the frequency characteristics is an excellent way of reducing vibrations if the excitation frequency is known, for example for a given frequency from the operation of a machine. In construction engineering, one tries to shift the eigenfrequency of pedestrian bridges and grandstands out of the frequency range which can be caused by pedestrians or crowds of people.
Vibration isolation requires a large amount of additional work to isolate the construction and to absorb large horizontal displacements which occur, for example, in a vibration-isolated construction during an earthquake.
Vibration dampers and tuned mass dampers are constructions which entail high installation and maintenance work or costs.
Increasing the damping of structures is a suitable method of reducing the vibration of load-bearing constructions in the resonance range and for dissipating the energy for example of the effect of an earthquake.
The energy delivered by the earthquake sets the load-bearing construction in oscillation. A failure of the load-bearing construction can be prevented if an effective energy absorption through dissipation of the delivered energy takes place at as many points as possible and at the same time the transfer of the vertical load (weight of the construction itself and load) is ensured. In load-bearing constructions of steel, diagonal rods, for example, can be connected eccentrically to the beam. With lateral displacement of the load-bearing construction as a result of an earthquake stress, plastic hinges develop in the beam, in which plastic hinges energy is dissipated through cyclic-plastic deformations.
In Christian Petersen, Schwingungsdämpfer im Ingenieurbau (Vibration Dampers in Construction Engineering), published by Maurer Söhne GmbH & Co. KG, Munich 2001, chapter 2, p. 43 and 44, a technique is described for increasing the structural damping for the hangers of tied arch bridges. Two steel rods are fixed to the hanger (load-bearing element), and are displaceably fastened to the hanger at several points using ties. Under an oscillatory loading, the frictional forces in the ties cause a markedly increased structural damping. Petersen writes that the solution he describes is technically difficult to implement and in particular the corrosion protection is problematic.
The object of the present invention is to create a load-bearing construction with increased structure damping which has a simple design and does not incur any additional costs for corrosion protection measures.
This object is achieved through a load-bearing construction with the characterizing features of claim 1.
The load-bearing construction according to the invention comprises at least one load-bearing element with at least one cavity and at least one rod communicating with the cavity. The cavity is filled with a material such that, if the load-bearing element is deformed, the rod is displaceable along its length relative to the load-bearing element, the rod being non-displaceably fixed at least at one point relative to the load-bearing element, the rod being designed such that it dissipates energy when there is a displacement relative to the load-bearing element. “Dissipate” means the conversion from one form of energy into heat.
In an embodiment of the invention, the load-bearing element comprises at least one cavity in which at least one rod is disposed. The total cross-sectional area of all the rods arranged in each cavity is smaller than the cross-sectional area of the cavity, and the remaining volume of the cavity is filled with a material. The rod can move along its length relative way to the load-bearing element when the load-bearing element is deformed. A high energy dissipation is attainable using this design. For a greater deformability of the rod, the rod can be non-displaceably fixed relative to the load-bearing element at only one point, and such that it dissipates energy when there is a relative displacement relative to the load-bearing element.
In an especially easy-to-manufacture embodiment of the load-bearing construction according to the invention, the rod is of tubular design and defines in its interior the cavity in which the material is received, the material being implemented as a liquid, whereby the rod changes the volume of the cavity upon deformation of the load-bearing element, so as to cause a displacement between the material and the rod.
A “rod” is defined in structural analysis as only being capable of bearing tensile and compressive forces. Of course, bending moments can also occur in a rod, which are however of a considerably smaller order of magnitude when compared with a beam. Rods, in the sense of the invention, are considered to be steel rods with round or rectangular cross section, tension wire strands, steel cables having a considerable stiffness, hollow sections of steel (round or polygonal) and rods, strands and wires of fibre-reinforced composite material.
Due to the fixing of the rod relative to the load-bearing element at a single point, and the longitudinally displaceable implementation of the rod relative to the load-bearing element, relative displacements between rod and load-bearing element can occur when deformations of the load-bearing element occur. These relative displacements are negligible at the point where the rod is fixed relative to the load-bearing element. With increasing distance from this point of fixation, the relative displacements between rod and load-bearing element become greater. In the case of a dynamic influence upon the load-bearing construction, cyclical relative displacements between rod and load-bearing element will occur at every point of the rod.
Binding stresses can be transferred between rod surface and load-bearing element, for example through friction or through the material located in the cavity. The cyclical sequence of binding stress/relative displacement relations offers the possibility of dissipating energy. Depending upon the design of the rod and the binding stresses which are generated through the relative displacements, energy will be dissipated along the rod. For good dissipation, rods made of a metallic material or a fibre-reinforced composite are recommended.
To increase the friction between rod and cavity inner surface and thereby promote the dissipation, it is advantageous if the surface of the rod and/or the inner surface of the cavity has/have a ribbing, a threading, a pattern, swelling or indentations. The same purpose can be served by strip-shaped, prismatic or cylindrical elements attached to the surface of the rod.
To achieve considerable dissipation, a further embodiment of the invention envisages that the length of the cavity amounts to at least ten times its greatest diameter. In this context it has been shown to be favourable if the cavity has a cylindrical or prismatic shape.
For example, if the diameter or the height of the cross section of the rod is between 10 mm and 200 mm, the radius of inertia (gyration) will be between 2.5 mm and 58 mm.
The material with which the volume of the cavity between rod surface and load-bearing element is filled can advantageously consist of a liquid, a granular material, a gas or a mixture of the aforementioned materials.
If a liquid is used as the material for filling the cavity, then shearing stresses are transferred into the liquid when there are relative displacements between rod and load-bearing element. The occurrence of shearing stresses and the friction connected therewith between the filaments of flow of the liquid results in energy dissipation. In the case of both laminar and turbulent flow, kinetic flow energy is thus converted into heat.
Liquids with different viscosities, in particular kinematic viscosities in the range of 10−6 [m2/s] to 1 [m2/s] are suitable as material for filling of the cavity. For example, water can be used, with a kinematic viscosity of 10−6 [m2/s] at ambient temperature, or hydraulic oil, with a kinematic viscosity of 10−2 [m2/s] at ambient temperature.
A preferred filling medium for damping elements is silicone oil. Silicone oils are produced for a wider range of applications, with kinematic viscosities of 10−6 [m2/s] to 1 [m2/s]. Of particular significance are methyl silicone oils. They are colourless, odourless, non-toxic and hydrophobic. They have a high resistance to acids and bases. At ambient temperatures they are practically non-volatile. The melting point is at −50° C., the flashpoint at 250° C. and the ignition temperature at about 400° C. The density is about 970 kg/m3.
Methyl silicone oils have a large range of viscosities and a minimal dependence of the viscosity on the temperature. A further characteristic is the high compressibility. Thus, even with very high compressive load, there is no risk of solidification of the silicone oil.
Materials for filling the cavity with granular material comprise, for example, sand, gravel, steel balls, balls of synthetic material or plastic, balls of aluminium or metallic balls with a covering of synthetic material or plastic. Also a combination of solid filling materials, for instance of granular material with liquids, are suitable for the filling of the cavity.
Air or nitrogen can be used, among others, as gaseous filling media.
A thixotropic fluid could also be used as filling medium. In some non-Newtonian fluids, the viscosity decreases with a mechanical stress. With elimination of the stress, the initial viscosity is restored.
To facilitate the maintenance of the load-bearing construction according to the invention, the rod and/or the material can be replaceable.
It is advantageous if the cavity is sealable in a tight way to prevent corrosion or penetration of dirt into the cavity.
A further increase of the dissipation through the rod is obtained if at least one section of the cavity in which the rod passes has a curvature or bend.
In a preferred embodiment of the load-bearing construction according to the invention, the cavity in the load-bearing element is disposed at a distance from the centroidal axis of the load-bearing element. The greater the distance is selected to be, the greater the relative displaceability of the rod and thus the dissipation.
A good damping of oscillations is obtained in a load-bearing construction according to the invention if the dimensions of the load-bearing construction along its centroidal axis are at least ten times greater than the cross sections orthogonal to the centroidal axis, and when a load-bearing element is disposed approximately parallel to, and at a distance from, the centroidal axis of the load-bearing construction.
In a favourable embodiment of the invention, the load-bearing element is composed of concrete or masonry, the cavity being formed by means of a tube. The tube is put in the concrete or masonry during the manufacture of the load-bearing element.
To increase the friction further, it is advantageous if the surface of the tube facing the cavity and/or the surface of the tube facing the load-bearing element have a ribbing, a pattern, swelling or indentations.
Another preferred embodiment of the load-bearing construction according to the invention is distinguished in that the rod is disposed outside the load-bearing element in a hollow section, in that the hollow section is disposed next to the load-bearing element and is firmly connected thereto at least three points, in that the cross-sectional area of the rod is smaller than the inner cross-sectional area of the hollow section and in that the remaining volume in the hollow section is filled with a material.
The according to the invention <sic. the invention> will be explained more closely in the following with reference to embodiment examples shown in the drawings. Shown are:
In the following explanation, reference is made, first of all, to
A load-bearing construction 1 for receiving a force F(t) applied at the upper end is shown in
Shown in
According to
In
A possible course of the relative displacements Δ(x) along the rod 4 is shown in
A possible relationship between relative displacement Δ and shear stress τ is shown in
A further possible relationship between relative displacement Δ and shear stress τ is shown in
A second embodiment of the load-bearing construction 1 according to the invention is shown in
A third embodiment of the load-bearing construction 1 according to the invention is shown in
A fourth embodiment of the load-bearing construction 1 according to the invention is shown in
A fifth embodiment of the load-bearing construction 1 according to the invention is shown in
A sixth embodiment of the load-bearing construction 1 according to the invention is shown in
A seventh embodiment of the load-bearing construction 1 according to the invention, in the form of a tied arch bridge 17, is shown in
An eighth embodiment of the load-bearing construction 1 according to the invention is shown in
A further embodiment of the load-bearing construction 1 according to the invention, which is similar to that of
Still another embodiment of the load-bearing construction 1 according to the invention is shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 437/2009 | Mar 2009 | AT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/053345 | 3/16/2010 | WO | 00 | 11/18/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/106047 | 9/23/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
774441 | Luck | Nov 1904 | A |
3101744 | Warnaka | Aug 1963 | A |
3503600 | Rich | Mar 1970 | A |
3691712 | Bowling et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
4111166 | Alstrin et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4706788 | Inman et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4720882 | Gallo | Jan 1988 | A |
5727663 | Taylor | Mar 1998 | A |
5868894 | Frenkel | Feb 1999 | A |
6152042 | Barry et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6499570 | Chu | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6701680 | Fanucci et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7051849 | Browne et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7264095 | Domange | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288326 | Elzey et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7735483 | Papageorgiou | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7793645 | Walk et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7996944 | Kollegger | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8215068 | Bongiorno | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20050257490 | Pryor et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20090260304 | Mochimaru et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100101160 | Bongiorno | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1162137 | Jan 1964 | DE |
10138250 | Sep 2002 | DE |
10047004 | Feb 1998 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Christian Petersen, Schwingungsdampfer im Ingenieurbau (Vibration Dampers in Structural Engineering), Maurer Sohne GmbH & Co KG, Munich, 2001, chapter 2, p. 43-44 (see p. 3, paragraph 1 of application specification for explanation of relevance). |
International Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/EP2010/053345. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Sep. 20, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/EP2010/053345. |
Matthias Kroeger, Reibleistendampfung in Leichtbaustrukturen, PAMM Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Wiley Interscience, vol. 3, Jan. 2003, p. 114-115. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120047846 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |