Support for cylinders in a paper shredder

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5829697
  • Patent Number
    5,829,697
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 8, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 3, 1998
    26 years ago
Abstract
A support placed in the cutting path of a multicylinder cutting assembly to prevent the shafts of the cutting cylinders from separating. In the preferred embodiment, the support comprises a base and two arm members extending upward from the base. The invention also includes a shredder comprising at least two cylinders; a plurality of cutting disks arranged on the cylinders; spacers alternatingly arranged on the cylinders between the cutting disks; and at least one support placed under the cylinders for preventing the cylinders from separating.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention pertains to the field of shredders. More specifically, the invention encompasses a shaft support for cylinders in a paper shredder.
Shafts for cutting cylinders are typically manufactured in one of two ways. They may be machined from a solid cylinder of steel. Alternately, they may be built up using separate cutters of steel, sintered metal, or other hard material on a shaft which uses the cross section of a polygon, a key, or some other feature to transmit power from the shaft to the cutters.
It is economically advantageous to make the cutting shaft as small in diameter as possible. However, the cutting cylinder experiences a considerable outward force as it attempts to cut increasing thicknesses of paper. Consequently, as the amount of paper to be shredded increases, a point is eventually reached where the paper bends the cutting cylinders. This results in paper passing through the shredder without being cut. One normal solution to this problem is to increase the diameter of the shaft or the beam strength of the material comprising the shaft. Unfortunately, this solution increases the cost of the paper shredder. An equally common solution is to decrease the power input. This solution is also undesirable because it decreases the capacity of the shredder. A large capacity shredder with a small diameter cutting cylinder would be a welcome improvement in the art.
SUMMARY
The present invention includes a support placed in the cutting path of a multicylinder cutting assembly to prevent the shafts of the cutting cylinders from separating. In the preferred embodiment, the support comprises a base and two arm members extending upward from the base such that each arm member is associated with a separate cutting cylinder.
The invention also encompasses a shredder comprising at least two cylinders; a plurality of cutting disks arranged on the cylinders; spacers alternatingly arranged on the cylinders between the cutting disks; and at least one support placed under the cylinders for preventing the cylinders from separating during operation of the shredder.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a front view of the preferred embodiment of the support of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the support of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a bottom view of the support of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a side view of two cutting cylinders placed in a paper shredder that includes the support of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the cutting cylinders of FIG. 4 taken along the line 5--5.
FIG. 6 is a front view of a second embodiment of the support of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a side view of the support of FIG. 6.
FIG. 8 is a bottom view of the support of FIG. 6.
FIG. 9 is a side view of two cutting cylinders placed in a paper shredder that includes the support of FIG. 6.
FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of the cutting cylinders of FIG. 9 taken along the line 10--10.
FIG. 11 is a front view of a third embodiment of the support of the present invention.
FIG. 12 is a side view of the support of FIG. 11.
FIG. 13 is a bottom view of the support of FIG. 11.
FIG. 14 is a side view of two cutting cylinders placed in a paper shredder that includes the support of FIG. 11.
FIG. 15 is a cross-sectional view of the cutting cylinders of FIG. 14 taken along the line 15--15.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a mid-shaft support for use in a paper shredder. The support is placed in the cutting path of a multicylinder cutting assembly to prevent the shafts of the cutting cylinders from separating. The preferred support 10 of the present invention is illustrated in FIGS. 1-5. As shown in FIG. 1, the support 10 comprises a base 20 and two arm members 30, 40 extending upward from the base 20. The width or thickness of the support 10 may vary. As depicted in FIGS. 4 and 5, each arm member 30, 40 of the support 10 should easily fit between two cutting disks on a cutting cylinder. In addition, the contour of the base 20 of the support 10 may vary. It is possible for the base 20 to be straight. However, a linear base 20 may be problematic because the support 10 is placed directly in the paper path and therefore becomes an obstacle for the shredded paper as it passes through the shredder. A nonlinear base 20 decreases the probability that the shredded paper will gather in the paper path. Therefore, the base 20 of the support 10 is preferably nonlinear as depicted in FIG. 3.
FIG. 4 illustrates the support 10 as it is properly positioned in a paper shredder. The shredder includes at least two cutting cylinders 50, 60. In the preferred embodiment, each cutting cylinder comprises a shaft 51, 61, a plurality of cutting disks 70 and a plurality of spacers 80. The spacers 80 may be formed integral with the cutting disks 70 or they may be separate components. The cutting disks 70 and spacers 80 may be placed on the shafts 51, 61 in any arrangement that will produce the desired cut. In the preferred embodiment depicted in FIG. 5, the cutting disks 70 and spacers 80 are alternatingly arranged on the shafts 51 and 61.
As best shown in FIGS. 4, 9, and 14, a vertical cutting path 7 is defined by a substantially vertical plane through the area where the cutting disks 70 of the cutting cylinders 50, 60 interleave. For the preferred embodiment, the portion of the base 20 that is within the cutting path 7 is represented by opposing dashed brackets and the reference numeral 20a, as shown in FIG. 3.
The method of securing the support 10 in position is not critical and may be accomplished by any feasible means. For example, the support 10 may be configured so that the arm members 30, 40 engage or surround part of the cutting cylinders 51, 61. Alternately, the support 10 may be secured in position by one or a plurality of shafts. In the preferred embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, the support 10 includes a small recess 31, 41 where the arm members 30, 40 meet the base 20. The recess 31, 41 is adapted to receive a portion of another component that is associated with the cutting cylinders 51, 61, such as a stripper.
During operation of the shredder, the arm members 30, 40 of the support 10 prohibit the cutting cylinders 50, 60 from separating because they limit the amount of bending that may occur in the shafts 51, 61.
The support 10 may be manufactured from any material that is sufficiently strong to accomplish the function of limiting the bending of the cutting cylinders 50, 60. The preferred support 10 is made of cold, rolled steel.
There are many possible variations of the preferred embodiment. For example, a second embodiment is illustrated in FIGS. 6-10. For the second embodiment, the portion of the base 20 that is within the cutting path 7 is represented by opposing dashed brackets and the reference numeral 20b, as shown in FIG. 8. In this embodiment, the arm members 30, 40 include a recessed portion 32, 42 along their inside edges. These recesses 32, 42 surround a portion of the cutting cylinder. More specifically, the recesses 32, 42 surround a portion of the spacer 80, as shown in FIGS. 9 and 10. As depicted in FIGS. 7 and 9, the base 20 has a different contour than the embodiment of FIGS. 1-5. In addition, this embodiment includes two apertures 21, 22 in the base which receive shafts that secure the support 10 in place.
A third embodiment is shown in FIGS. 11-15. This embodiment also includes recesses 33, 43 along the inside edge of the arm members 30, 40. However, the recesses 33, 43 of this embodiment are shaped slightly differently than those of the second embodiment. As most clearly illustrated in FIG. 13, the contour of the base 20 is also different. For the third embodiment, the portion of the base 20 that is within the cutting path 7 is represented by opposing dashed brackets and the reference numeral 20c, as shown in FIG. 13. Furthermore, the base 20 includes one aperture 23 which receives a shaft that secures the support 10 in place.
There are many advantages to the support of the present invention. Firstly, the support increases the capacity of small diameter cutting cylinders several fold without diminishing the quality of the cut. Secondly, the addition of the mid-shaft support does not increase the noise level of the operating paper shredder. Thirdly, the cost of introducing mid-shaft supports is minimal, especially when compared to the cost of using large diameter shafts or shafts made of stronger material.
It should be appreciated that the apparatus of the present invention is capable of being incorporated in the form of a variety of embodiments, only a few of which have been illustrated and described above. The invention may be embodied in other forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive, and the scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Claims
  • 1. A support device for shafts of cutting cylinders for a shredder wherein the cylinders include a plurality of cutting disks that define a vertical cutting path, the device comprising:
  • a support placed across the cutting path to prevent the shafts of the cutting cylinders from separating.
  • 2. In a paper shredder having a pair of cutting cylinders with a plurality of cutting disks that define a vertical cutting path, a support placed across the cutting path of the paper shredder, the support comprising:
  • a) a base and
  • b) two arm members extending upward from the base such that each arm member is associated with a different cutting cylinder.
  • 3. The support recited in claim 2 wherein the base is nonlinear.
  • 4. A support placed across a vertical cutting path defined by a pair of cutting disks of cutting cylinders of a paper shredder, the support comprising:
  • a) a base and
  • b) two arm members extending upward from the base such that each arm member is associated with a different cutting cylinder, each arm member having an inside edge and an outside edge, each arm member further having a recess along a portion of the inside edge.
  • 5. The support recited in claim 4 wherein the base is nonlinear.
  • 6. A shredder comprising:
  • a) a housing
  • b) at least two cutting cylinders, each cylinder comprising:
  • i) a shaft;
  • ii) a plurality of cutting disks arranged on the shaft;
  • iii) a plurality of spacers alternatingly arranged on the shaft between the cutting disks; and
  • c) at least one support placed across a vertical cutting path defined by the cutting disks of the cylinders for preventing the cylinders from separating.
  • 7. The shredder of claim 6 wherein there are two cylinders.
  • 8. The shredder of claim 6 wherein the spacers are integral with the cutting disks.
  • 9. The shredder of claim 6 wherein the support is integral with the housing of the shredder.
  • 10. The shredder of claim 6 wherein the support further comprises:
  • a) a base and
  • b) two arm members extending upward from the base, each arm member having an inside edge and an outside edge, each arm member further having a recess along a portion of the inside edge, the recess adapted to substantially abut a portion of a spacer.
  • 11. The support recited in claim 10 wherein the base is nonlinear.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/519,409, filed Aug. 24, 1995 now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (107)
Number Name Date Kind
1019828 O'Bryan Mar 1912
1090914 Guettler Mar 1914
1178386 Edwards Apr 1916
1673336 Lehmicke Jun 1928
1699157 Pendleton Jan 1929
1731967 Antonsen Oct 1929
2182219 Ashley Dec 1939
2202843 Edwards Jun 1940
2216612 Dimm et al. Oct 1940
2224948 Bloomquist Dec 1940
2236969 Flateboe Apr 1941
2259015 Anderson et al. Oct 1941
2381775 Roddy Aug 1945
2554114 Menkin et al. May 1951
2657720 Wolfe Nov 1953
2770302 Lee Nov 1956
2873923 Bergman Feb 1959
2894697 Panning et al. Jul 1959
3033064 Lee May 1962
3126931 Blanshine et al. Mar 1964
3286574 Durand Nov 1966
3369763 Perry Feb 1968
3396914 Liebman Aug 1968
3510077 Priscu May 1970
3524597 Burden, Jr. et al. Aug 1970
3529782 Liebman Sep 1970
3620461 Pelleschi et al. Nov 1971
3620462 Dooley, Jr. Nov 1971
3630460 Goldhammer Dec 1971
3664592 Schweigert et al. May 1972
3682402 Goldhammer Aug 1972
3711034 Ehinger Jan 1973
3724766 Bosland Apr 1973
3790093 McIntyre Feb 1974
3797765 Samuels Mar 1974
3860180 Goldhammer Jan 1975
3880361 Schwarz Apr 1975
3894697 Lawson et al. Jul 1975
3921920 Brocard Nov 1975
3931935 Holman Jan 1976
3960334 Wudyka Jun 1976
4009838 Tashman Mar 1977
4018392 Wagner Apr 1977
4034918 Culbertson et al. Jul 1977
4068805 Oswald Jan 1978
4106708 Kropa Aug 1978
4157671 Goldhammer Jun 1979
4172400 Brierley Oct 1979
4194698 Kosmowski Mar 1980
4200239 Simone et al. Apr 1980
4226372 Wigand Oct 1980
4257565 Hatanaka Mar 1981
4260115 Hatanaka Apr 1981
4330092 Roman May 1982
4334650 Hardwick et al. Jun 1982
4346851 Bernardi et al. Aug 1982
4349159 Hardwick et al. Sep 1982
4351485 Hardwick et al. Sep 1982
4355766 Wigand Oct 1982
4363453 Hill et al. Dec 1982
4385732 Williams May 1983
4394983 Ulsky Jul 1983
4399946 Stevenson Aug 1983
4411391 Crane Oct 1983
4426044 Butler Jan 1984
4489897 Turner et al. Dec 1984
4522096 Niven, Jr. Jun 1985
4545537 Kimura et al. Oct 1985
4557421 Probst et al. Dec 1985
4558827 Berger Dec 1985
4562971 Schwelling Jan 1986
4564146 Bleasdale Jan 1986
4565330 Katoh Jan 1986
4615490 Goldhammer Oct 1986
4619407 Goldhammer Oct 1986
4625925 Goldhammer Dec 1986
4627581 Holiman et al. Dec 1986
4627582 Goldhammer Dec 1986
4637560 Goldhammer Jan 1987
4650128 Goldhammer Mar 1987
4651610 Schwelling Mar 1987
4657192 Browning Apr 1987
4688730 Dahle Aug 1987
4690340 Hatanaka Sep 1987
4691871 Mochizuki Sep 1987
4693428 Raterman et al. Sep 1987
4709197 Goldhammer et al. Nov 1987
4717085 Crane Jan 1988
4773603 Schwelling Sep 1988
4809916 Schwelling Mar 1989
4830295 Schwelling May 1989
4860963 Goldhammer et al. Aug 1989
4881692 Goldhammer et al. Nov 1989
4889291 Goldhammer et al. Dec 1989
4919345 Burlington et al. Apr 1990
4936517 Kammerer et al. Jun 1990
4997134 MacGregor Mar 1991
5044270 Schwelling Sep 1991
5071080 Herbst et al. Dec 1991
5141168 Pepper Aug 1992
5163629 Raterman et al. Nov 1992
5170702 Schwelling Dec 1992
5230477 Strohmeyer Jul 1993
5261614 Schwelling Nov 1993
5295633 Kimbro et al. Mar 1994
5400978 Strohmeyer Mar 1995
5409171 Stangenberg et al. Apr 1995
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
10681 Oct 1979 EPX
0069721 Sep 1982 EPX
3001507 Jul 1981 DEX
3312173A1 Nov 1984 DEX
705066 Mar 1954 GBX
1468662 May 1973 GBX
1502076 Feb 1978 GBX
1569375 Jun 1980 GBX
2059804A Aug 1980 GBX
2097717A Mar 1982 GBX
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 519409 Aug 1995