This Application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/999,074, entitled “Workflows With Associated Processes,” filed on Nov. 30, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed to technology for supporting multiple versions of an application program interface.
2. Description of the Related Art
With the growth of the Internet, the use of networks, and other information technologies, Identity Systems have become more popular. In general, an Identity System provides for the creation, removal, editing and other managing of identity information stored in various types of data stores. The identity information pertains to users, groups, organizations and/or things. For each entry in the data store, a set of attributes are stored. For example, the attributes stored for a user may include a name, address, employee number, telephone number, email address, user ID and password. The Identity System can also manage access privileges that govern what an entity can view, create, modify or use in the Identity System. Often, this management of access privileges is based on one or more specific attributes, membership in a group and/or association with an organization.
In operation, Identity System applications frequently invoke client plug-in programs that reside outside of the Identity System. Each client program performs an operation that is not integrated into the Identity System. For example, the Identity System may invoke a client program to perform encryption and decryption.
The Identity System interacts with each client program through an application program interface (“API”). The application program interface defines how the Identity System and client program will exchange communications. For example, the application program interface may specify the format, fields, and protocols to employ when passing data between the Identity System and a client program. The concept of application program interfaces is well known in the art.
In some instances, it may be useful for an Identity System to support more than one application program interface. For example, a new version of an Identity System may support the following: 1) an old API that is compatible with a prior version of the Identity System, and 2) a new API that takes advantage of additional functionality in the new Identity System. This provides users with a backward compatible API for existing client programs and an API with enhanced capability for newly developed client programs.
It is desirable for the Identity System to support the appropriate application program interface to use with each client program. One existing approach provides a single application program interface with the ability to support both a current version of an API and prior versions of the API. This solution becomes unmanageable as the number of API revisions grows. In another solution, information exchanged between a main application and a client program includes a header that identifies the API. This solution has the drawbacks of adding overhead and requiring the client program to initiate communication with the main application to identify the API. Improved support for switching between application program interfaces would be beneficial.
Some Identity System users also employ an Access Systems. An Access System provides for the authentication and authorization of users attempting to access resources. For efficiency purposes, there is an advantage to integrating the Identity System and the Access System. For example, both systems may utilize a single set of group objects that identify user membership in various groups. Additionally, integrating the Identity System and the Access System allows for single-sign-on functionality across multiple resources. Thus, there is also a need to support multiple application program interfaces in an Access Systems and integrated Identity/Access Systems. Systems other than Identity and Access Systems can also benefit from supporting multiple application program interfaces.
The present invention, roughly described, pertains to technology for supporting multiple application program interfaces. In one embodiment, a main application employs a registration list to identify the proper application program interface to use with a desired program—a program outside of the main application, such as a plug-in. The registration list can reside in one self-contained location, such as a configuration file, or be distributed among various locations, like a set of database entries. This allows the main application to identify the proper API for the desired application before interacting with the desired program, so that the API can be employed from the outset.
In one embodiment, the registration list includes a set of entries. Each entry identifies a program and a corresponding API to use with the program. Prior to interacting with the desired program, the main application accesses an entry in the registration list for the desired program to identify the corresponding API. The main application then uses the identified API to invoke and interact with the desired program.
In one implementation, the registration list is an event catalog with each entry correlating an event to a program and the API used by the program. When an event occurs, the main application accesses an event catalog entry to identify a program that corresponds to the event and the API that corresponds to the program. The main application then interacts with the program using the corresponding API. Those skilled in the art understand that any type of condition or occurrence can trigger an event. For example, the reception of data can be an event that triggers a data decryption program.
Various embodiments of the present invention are incorporated in an Identity, Access, or integrated Identity/Access System. This enables the applications in these systems to support multiple application program interfaces without using version identification headers or a single cumbersome API to support multiple modes of operation. Further embodiments, however, are employed in systems other than Identity, Access, and integrated Identity/Access Systems.
The present invention can be accomplished using hardware, software, or a combination of both hardware and software. The software used for the present invention is stored on one or more processor readable storage media including hard disk drives, CD-ROMs, DVDs, optical disks, floppy disks, tape drives, RAM, ROM or other suitable storage devices. In alternative embodiments, some or all of the software can be replaced by dedicated hardware including custom integrated circuits, gate arrays, FPGAs, PLDs, and special purpose computers. In one embodiment, software implementing the present invention is used to program one or more processors. The processors can be in communication with one or more storage devices, peripherals and/or communication interfaces.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will appear more clearly from the following description in which the preferred embodiment of the invention has been set forth in conjunction with the drawings.
Web Server 18 is a standard Web Server known in the art and provides an end user with access to various resources via network 16. One embodiment includes two firewalls. A first firewall (see dotted lines) is connected between network 16 and Web Server 18. A second firewall (see dotted lines) is connected between Web Servers 16 and 18 and Access Server 34/Identity Server 40.
The Access System includes Access Server 34, Web Gate 28, and Directory 36. Access Server 34 provides authentication, authorization, auditing and logging services. It further provides for identity profiles to be used across multiple domains and for access based on a single web-based authentication (sign-on). Web Gate 28 acts as an interface between Web Server 18 and Access Server 34. Web Gate 28 intercepts requests from users for resources 22 and 24, and authorizes them via Access Server 34. Access Server 34 is able to provide centralized authentication, authorization, and auditing services for resources hosted on or available to Web Server 18 and other Web Servers.
The Identity System includes Web Pass 38, Identity Server 40 and Directory 36. Identity Server 40 manages identity profiles. An identity profile is a set of information associated with a particular entity (e.g. user, group, organization, etc.). The data elements of the identity profile are called attributes. An attribute may include a name, a value and access criteria. The Identity Server includes three main applications, which effectively handle the identity profiles and privileges of the user population: User Manager 42, Group Manager 44, and Organization Manager 46. User Manager 42 manages the identity profiles for individual users. Group Manager 44 manages identity profiles for groups. Organization Manager 46 manages identity profiles for organizations. Identity Server 40 also includes Publisher 48, an application that enables entities to quickly locate and graphically view information stored by Directory 36. In one embodiment, Web Pass 38 is a Web Server plug-in that sends information back and forth between Identity Server 40 and the Web Server 20, creating a three-tier architecture. The Identity System also provides a Certificate Processing Server (not shown in
User Manager 42 handles the functions related to user identities and access privileges, including creation and deletion of user identity profiles, modification of user identity profile data, determination of access privileges, and credentials management of both passwords and digital certificates. With User Manager 42, the create, delete, and modify functions of user identity management can be set as flexible, multi-step workflows. Each business can customize its own approval, setup, and management processes and have multiple processes for different kinds of users.
Group Manager 44 allows entities to create, delete and manage groups of users who need identical access privileges to a specific resource or set of resources. Managing and controlling privileges for a group of related people—rather than handling their needs individually—yield valuable economies of scale. Group Manager 44 meets a wide range of e-business needs: easy creation, maintenance, and deletion of permanent and ad hoc groups of users who may be allowed or denied access to particular resources; modification and adaptation of groups and their access privileges with minimal disruption to the directory server's underlying schema; efficient addition and deletion of users from established groups; and delegation of administrative responsibility for group membership and subscription requests and approvals.
With Group Manager 44, companies (or other entities) can allow individual users to do the following: (1) self-subscribe to and unsubscribe from groups, (2) view the groups that they are eligible to join or have joined, and (3) request subscription to groups that have access to the applications they need. Multi-step workflows can then define which users must obtain approval before being added to a group and which can be added instantly. Group Manager 44 also lets organizations form dynamic groups specified by an LDAP filter. The ability to create and use dynamic groups is extremely valuable because it eliminates the administrative headache of continually keeping individual, static membership up-to-date. With dynamic group management features, users can be automatically added or removed if they meet the criteria specified by the LDAP filter. Dynamic groups also greatly enhance security since changes in user identities that disqualify someone from membership in a group are automatically reflected in the dynamic group membership.
The third application in the Identity System, Organization Manager 46, streamlines the management of large numbers of organizations within an e-business network, including partners, suppliers, or even major internal organizations such as sales offices and business units. Certain infrastructure security and management operations are best handled—or can only be handled—at the highest organizational unit level rather than at the individual or group level. Like User Manager and Group Manager, this application relies on multi-step workflow and delegation capabilities. Organization Manager handles the following administrative tasks: (1) organization lifecycle management, whereby companies can create, register, and delete organizations in their systems using customizable workflows; (2) maintenance of organization profiles on an attribute-by-attribute basis through self-service, delegated administration and system-initiated activities; (3) organization self-registration, whereby organizations such as business partners, customers and suppliers can self-generate a request to be added to the e-business network; and (4) creation of reusable rules and processes through multi-step workflows.
The various components of
The system of
To understand how the system of
With the system of
The received log-on information is passed back to Web Server 18 and on to Web Gate 28. Web Gate 28 in turn makes an authentication request to Access Server 34, which determines whether the user's supplied log-on information is authentic or not. Access Server 34 performs the authentication by accessing attributes of the user's identity profile and the resource's authentication criteria stored on Directory 36. If the user's supplied log-on information satisfies the authentication criteria, the process flows as described below; otherwise, the end user is notified that access to the requested resource is denied and the process halts.
After authenticating the user, Web Gate 28 queries Access Server 34 about whether the user is authorized to access the resource requested. Access Server 34 in turn queries Directory 36 for the appropriate authorization criteria for the requested resource. Access Server 34 retrieves the authorization criteria for the resource and answers Web Gate 28's authorization query, based on the resource's authorization criteria and the user's identity profile. If the user is authorized, the user is granted access to the resource; otherwise, the user's request is denied. Various alternatives to the above described flow are also within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Authentication and Authorization decisions are based on policy domains and policies. A policy domain is a logical grouping of Web Server host ID's, host names, URL prefixes, and rules. Host names and URL prefixes specify the course-grain portion of the web name space a given policy domain protects. Rules specify the conditions in which access to requested resources is allowed or denied, and to which end users these conditions apply. Policy domains contain two levels of rules: first level default rules and second level rules contained in policies. First level default rules apply to any resource in a policy domain not associated with a policy.
A policy is a grouping of a URL pattern, resource type, operation type (such as a request method), and policy rules. These policy rules are the second level rules described above. Policies are always attached to a policy domain and specify the fine-grain portion of a web name space that a policy protects. In practice, the host names and URL prefixes from the policy's policy domain are logically concatenated with the policy's URL pattern. The resulting overall pattern is compared to the incoming URL. If there is a match, then the policy's various rules are evaluated to determine whether the request should be allowed or denied; if there is not a match, then default policy domain rules are used.
If the user successfully authenticates for the requested resource (step 62), then the method proceeds to step 74. Otherwise, the unsuccessful authentication is logged (step 64). After step 64, the system performs authentication failure actions and Web Gate 28 denies the user access to the requested resource (step 66). In step 74, the successful authentication of the user for the resource is logged. The method then performs authentication success actions (step 76). In response to the successful authentication, Web Gate 28 then passes a valid authentication cookie to browser 12 (step 80), which stores the cookie. After passing the cookie in step 80, the system attempts to authorize (step 56).
In step 56, the method determines whether the user is authorized to access the requested resource. If the user is authorized (step 90), the method proceeds to step 92. Otherwise, the unsuccessful authorization is logged (step 96). After step 96, the method performs authorization failure actions (step 98) and Web Gate 28 denies the user access to the requested resource. If authorization is successful (step 90), then the successful authorization of the user is logged (step 92). Authorization success actions are performed in step 94. The user is granted access to the requested resource (step 95). In one embodiment of step 95, some or all of HTTP request information is provided to the resource. In one or more scenarios, the resource being accessed is the Identity System.
More information about authorization, authentication, an Access System and an Identity System can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/999,074, “Workflows With Associated Processes,” filed on Nov. 30, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Both the Identity System and the Access System make use of Directory 36. The basic unit of information store in Directory 36 is called an entry or identity profile, which is a collection of information about an object. The information in an entry often describes a real-world object such as a person, but this is not required. A typical directory includes many entries that correspond to people, departments, groups and other objects in the organization served by the directory. An entry is composed of a set of attributes, each of which describes one particular trait of the object. Each attribute has a type, one or more values, and associated access criteria. The type describes the kind of information contained in the attribute, and the value contains the actual data.
An entry in the directory has a set of attributes that are required and a set of attributes that are allowed. For example, an entry describing a person is required to have a cn (common name) attribute and an sn (surname) attribute. One example of an allowed attribute may be a nickname. Any attribute not explicitly required or allowed is prohibited.
Examples of attributes stored in a user identity profile include: first name, middle name, last name, title, email address, telephone number, fax number, mobile telephone number, pager number, pager email address, identification of work facility, building number, floor number, mailing address, room number, mail stop, manager, direct reports, administrator, organization that the user works for, department number, department URL, skills, projects currently working on, past projects, home telephone, home address, birthday, previous employers and anything else desired to be stored by an administrator. Examples of attributes stored in a group identity profile include: owner, name, description, static members, dynamic member rule, subscription policies, etc. Examples of attributes stored in a user organization identity profile include: owner, name, description, business category, address, country, etc. In other embodiments, less or more than the above-listed information is stored.
Each entity has a distinguished name (DN), which uniquely identifies the node. In one embodiment, each entry also has a relative name, which is different from all other relevant names on the same level of the hierarchy. In one implementation, the distinguished name (DN) comprises a union of the relative names up the tree. For example, the distinguished name of employee 1 (node 150) is
DN=CN=Empl, OU=OrgA, O=CompanyA, DC=entity,
where:
There are many ways for an entity to access and use the Identity System. In one embodiment, the entity can access the Identity System's services using a browser. In other embodiments, XML documents and API's can be used to access the services of the Identity System. For example, an entity can use a browser by pointing the browser to Identity Server 40. The user will then be provided with a login page to enter the user's ID, password, type of user and application requested (optional). Upon filling out that information, the user will be authenticated and authorized (by the Access System) to use the Identity System. Alternatively, the Access System can be bypassed (or there may be no Access System) and the Identity System authenticates the user.
As described above, the Identity System of
By selecting My Identity tab 206, a user is provided with the information stored in that user's identity profile. Create User Identity tab 208 allows a user with the appropriate privileges to create a new user identity profile (e.g. with a workflow). Deactivate User Identity tab 210 allows a user with proper privileges to remove an identity profile from the directory. Substitute Rights tab 212 allows the user to indicate who can proxy that user and allows the user to be a proxy for someone else. Request tab 214 allows a user to monitor workflows that are in progress or recently completed. Depending on the user's privileges, by selecting request tab 214, the user can see all workflows that involve that user, that are started by that user, that affect that user or that the user has privileges to view. Request tab 214 will indicate workflows for which there is an outstanding action to be done by the current user. The user can select that workflow and perform the task.
Configure tab 216 allows a user to configure various options for User Manger 42. The user must have sufficient privileges to access Configure tab 216. The user can perform attribute access control, delegate administration, define workflows and set the search base. Attribute access control includes controlling who has view and modify permissions for each attribute. Attributes can be set at any and all levels in an organization. The configuration also allows the specification of an e-mail notification list when a change to an attribute is requested. Delegation administration includes delegating administrative tasks to local administrators. An entity can choose what rights to delegate, whom to delegate to, and the scope to delegate. Workflow definition includes defining workflows for a particular organization, defining who will be responsible for the workflow actions and/or defining who will be receiving notifications for the workflow actions. Setting the search base includes setting the search base for a particular organization, person or set of persons. This will localize access to ensure security.
Configure tab 240 allows an entity to provide attribute access control, delegate rights, define workflows and expand dynamic groups. Attribute access control includes controlling who has view and modify permissions for each attribute in group identity profiles. Additionally, e-mail notification lists can be created which are used to notify entities when a change to an attribute is requested. Administration tasks can be delegated to local administrators. An entity can choose what rights to delegate, who to delegate to, and what the scope of the delegation is. Workflow definition includes defining the workflows for a particular group. This includes defining who is responsible for the workflow actions and who will be receiving notifications for workflow actions. Note that some of the tabs and services may not be available to all entities, depending upon the privileges of those entities. Manage Subscriptions tab 239 allows users to subscribe to groups or unsubscribe from groups. Manage Members tab 241 allows users to view, add, remove, and search members of a group.
Create Organizational Profile tab 246 allows a user to create new organizational objects, if the user has sufficient privileges. Request tab 248 allows a user to access pending workflows and workflows that have recently been finished that relate to organizational objects. Access to Request tab 248 can be restricted and/or limited depending upon users privileges. If a user has a step to perform for a workflow, it will be indicated by Request tab 248.
Configure tab 250 allows the entity to perform attribute access control, delegate administration, define workflows and define container limits. Attribute access control includes controlling who has view and modify permissions for each attribute of an organizational identity profile. In addition, an entity can specify an e-mail notification list when a change to an attribute is requested. Delegating administration includes delegating administrative tasks to local administrators. An entity can choose what rights to delegate, whom to delegate to, and the scope of the delegation. Workflow definition includes defining the workflows for a particular organization, including who will be responsible for the workflow actions and who will be receiving notifications for the workflow. Container limits includes controlling how many objects can be created in an organization. This would also include defining who will be receiving notifications that a container limit has been met, has been violated or is close to being met.
In one embodiment, the Identity System uses an application program interface registration list to perform step 300. The list correlates application program interfaces to programs. One example of a registration list is a configuration file, as described below with reference to
Once the API is identified, the Identity System application interacts with the program using the identified API (step 302). In one implementation, the interaction in step 302 includes the Identity System invoking and exchanging communications with the program. Any of the applications in the Identity System can carry out the process steps shown in
Prior to invoking an outside program, the Identity System uses the configuration file to identify the API that corresponds to the outside program. As shown in
In various embodiments, different circumstances trigger the Identity System to look to the configuration file. In one instance, the Identity System looks to the configuration file in response to the occurrence of an event. The Identity System looks to the configuration file to identify a program that corresponds to the event and an API that corresponds to the program. For example, the reception of data can trigger the Identity System to examine the configuration file—looking for an entry that identifies a program and corresponding API to invoke in response to the reception of data.
Another example of a registration list used to correlate events to programs and application interfaces is an event catalog.
One implementation of the event catalog contains entries that each correlate an event to a program and a corresponding API. An example entry includes identifiers for an event, a program to invoke in response to the event, and an API to use with the program. In alternate embodiments, the event catalog has different formats. Greater details about the event catalog are provided below.
Once an event occurs (step 312), the Identity System identifies an entry in the event catalog that corresponds to the event (step 314). As described above, each entry lists an event in one embodiment. In some instances, there may not be a corresponding entry and no program will be invoked. After identifying the entry, the Identity System identifies an API corresponding to the event (step 316)—reading the API listed in the identified event catalog entry in one embodiment. The Identity System also identifies a program corresponding to the event (step 318)—reading the program listed in the identified event catalog entry in one embodiment. The Identity System interacts with the program identified in step 318 using the API identified in step 316 (step 320). In interacting with the program, the Identity System invokes the program and exchanges communications with the program according to the identified API. Any application in the Identity System can perform the Identity System steps in
Although the processes shown in
In one implementation, an event catalog is employed to invoke outside programs through the use of a pre and post processing feature of the integrated Identity System and Access System. The pre and post processing allows third parties to extend the base of functionality of the system by providing custom actions based on specific defined events. The base elements of pre and post processing are the events referred to above. Events occur any time the user interacts with the system. Events can be as simple as adding, modifying or deleting an object or could be as complex as a specific step within a workflow process.
Actions are functions or applications that perform a task in response to an event, like the outside programs described above. These actions are defined to enhance the base functionality of the system of
The “actionName” is the name of the event. The convention for most events is APPNAME_EVENTNAME_PPPTYPE. APPNAME is the name of the application. EVENTNAME is the name of the event. PPPTYPE is the type of processing (pre event or post event). For a workflow, the APPNAME is the workflow ID for the workflow, the EVENTNAME is the step number in the workflow. The “api” identifies an application program interface. The “exectype” is a type of hook, which can be exec or lib. An exec is an executable. A type that is lib is in a library such as a dll. The “param” is the parameter, which the system takes to output the value. The parameters are deliminated by commas. The “path” is the path for the external exc or dll to be launched. The “execparam” identifies the input parameters, deliminated by a comma. The “func” is the function in the shared library. Thus, when the event defined in actionName occurs, the appropriate executable or library function is called using the identified application program interface.
The foregoing detailed description of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The described embodiments were chosen in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/395,152, “Access and Identity System,” filed on Jul. 11, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5010478 | Deran | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5077666 | Brimm et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5664154 | Purcell et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5713023 | Hayata et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5721900 | Banning et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724595 | Gentner | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5732408 | Takahashi | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734837 | Flores et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5754939 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5815703 | Copeland et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5848273 | Fontana et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5944824 | He | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6014666 | Helland et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6044465 | Dutcher et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6078747 | Jewitt | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6131120 | Reid | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6134634 | Marshall, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6138104 | Marchak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141778 | Kane et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6145003 | Sanu et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151531 | Frankel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6158010 | Moriconi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6182142 | Win et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6195710 | Borgendale et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6208986 | Schneck et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212558 | Antur et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6253202 | Gilmour | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253239 | Shklar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253257 | Dundon | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6256737 | Bianco et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6256739 | Skopp et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6260077 | Rangarajan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266420 | Langford et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6278993 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6279043 | Hayward et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6314470 | Ward et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6323881 | Broulik | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6335927 | Elliott et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6338097 | Krenzke et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343287 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6347312 | Byrne et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6349306 | Malik et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6353929 | Houston | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6366913 | Fitler, Jr. et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6401101 | Britton et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6401138 | Judge et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6415368 | Glance et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6434531 | Lancelot et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442567 | Retallick et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6490655 | Kershaw | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499023 | Dong et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6523022 | Hobbs | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6529941 | Haley et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6539379 | Vora et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6549941 | Jaquith et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6611840 | Baer et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6647383 | August et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6671695 | McFadden | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6671745 | Mathur et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6701368 | Chennapragada et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6704807 | Mathur et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6704873 | Underwood | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6708170 | Byrne et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6721804 | Rubin et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6732178 | Van Horne et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6732179 | Brown et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6741853 | Jiang et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6757720 | Wechsler, Jr. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6760750 | Boneh et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6768988 | Boreham et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6769000 | Akhtar et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6785686 | Boreham et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6785713 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785726 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6839701 | Baer et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6880086 | Kidder et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6948135 | Ruthfield et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 7013435 | Gallo et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7013469 | Smith et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7035926 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7039871 | Cronk | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7069330 | McArdle et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7076784 | Russell et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7114037 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7120914 | Manthos et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7213249 | Loo et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7216163 | Sinn | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7231661 | Villavicencio | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7249369 | Knouse | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7266595 | Black et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7340447 | Ghatare | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7349912 | Delany et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7363339 | Delany et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7380008 | Teng et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7398311 | Joshi et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 20020032684 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038306 | Griffin et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049749 | Helgeson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020067370 | Forney et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020073180 | Dewhurst et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083178 | Brothers | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138763 | Delany et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161766 | Lawson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030028752 | Fu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037052 | Kitain et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055762 | Holt | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055806 | Wong et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065558 | Shaw et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083908 | Steinmann | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088708 | Lewallen | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097380 | Mulhern et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105733 | Boreham et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105742 | Boreham et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115196 | Boreham et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115548 | Melgar | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120593 | Bansal et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120601 | Ouye et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144982 | Reulein et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145074 | Penick | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204481 | Lau | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208397 | VanDusen | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217127 | Sinn | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217333 | Smith et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040003351 | Sommerer et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024762 | Agarwal et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20050240490 | Mackey | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040010791 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60395152 | Jul 2002 | US |