The present invention relates to structures and devices for storing and/or handling small barrels, such as the so-called “barriques”, widely used in wineries.
Fundamental needs for the design of the structures in question are required by the geometry and the weight of the various barriques, in order to construct structures, which are useful for the different types of barrique, having slightly different measures and all with a total weight, when full, in the order of about 300 kg.
The barriques are used for wine refinement, which can take place both in industrial environments and in entertaining rooms destined to house also visitors, and where the aesthetical appearance is therefore more important. In the first case, the reduction in positioning times, the maintenance and handling of barriques must allow low administration costs; in known solutions, the barriques were positioned coupled onto metallic frames, constructed with profiles in steel or aluminum, or wood, which allow fast handling through lifting equipment and forklifts.
For a safe and easy engagement by the forklifts, the frames must provide for very precautionary spaces for engaging the lifting means, that on the other hand increase spaces between the barriques and decrease the storing capacity of the rooms; generally, this disadvantage is tolerated or compensated through greater volumes of the storing environments, which can be designed in the modern realities. The steel or aluminum frame for barriques is therefore suitable for the purpose for which it has been designed.
Other alternate systems have been studied to find increasingly great benefits—in storing and handling—to the detriment of the traditional aesthetic appearance of the wooden barrique.
All these solutions can not be applied in those realities in which the “tradition” is an important feature, i.e. where, around the barriques, particularly suggestive atmospheres are created, respectful of the wine and of the ancient tradition of wine producers. Currently, in these places, defined as “wine temples”, the barriques are generally positioned on elements made of typical woods such as durmast oak or oak; the most utilized solutions consist in positioning on beams, saddles or simple wedges interposed between the barriques.
In some cases, attempts have been made to combine the above mentioned requirements through the construction of wooden supports with possibility of handling, in particular with saddles suitable to be forked by the forklifts for the handling of the single barriques. However, the modest mechanical features of wood do not allow construction of frames for the required contemporaneous handling of at least two barriques.
According to one aspect, the present invention provides a structure, which solves at least partly one or more of the various problems described above.
More specifically, the subject of one embodiment of the invention is a complex comprising a new type of structure for storing and handling barriques in the wineries.
The structure in question has been studied to satisfy particular requirements, among which those indicated below:
A first substantial subject of the present invention is a supporting structure for the storage of the so-called “barriques”, which comprises two frames i.e. saddles, each of which is shaped in such a way as to form, at one side, at least two seats suitable to form a rest for two barriques arranged side by side, and to form, at the opposite side, at least an intermediate seat and rests on barriques which are below the two said flanked barriques.
According to some preferred embodiment, at least one frame and preferably each said frames or saddles form housings for engagement by the forks of the lifting means or other lifting devices. In some preferred embodiments, therefore, housings are provided on or accessible from each side of the structure, such that said structure can be engaged at both sides by means of lifting forks or the like. Said housings can be formed in the two undulated sections or section bars, forming the saddles, or else they can be formed in transverse rods connecting said two undulated sections.
According to some embodiments the saddles are shaped in such a way as to contact the barriques between the metallic hoops or near said hoops, which are typical of the barriques. Anyway, it is possible to use wedges to compensate for any dimensional difference and to ensure stability to the contacts between saddles and barriques.
In addition to the previously mentioned structure, a supporting structure is advantageously provided, which comprises two saddles, each of which is shaped in such a way as to form a seat for receiving one barrique, and two opposite ends with opposite rest curvatures. According to some preferred embodiments, towards each of said ends a housing is advantageously provided, for engagement by the forks of a lifting means or other lifting devices.
An embodiment is also feasible, in which each saddle can be designed so as to form at one side two seats and, at the opposite side, three seats for barriques.
According to some embodiments, the two saddles of each structure are connected by means of at least two tie rods, preferably positioned in such a way as not to interfere with the central portions of the barriques resting on the seats. In some embodiments two tie rods may be constructed as tubular bars in order to constitute the two housings suitable to receive and guide the forks of the lifting means or other lifting device in an easy manner.
The saddles may be formed by sections, such as extruded section bars, with a full or hollow body, shaped in such a way as to combine strength, bulk and aesthetics.
The seats may receive wedges suitable to contrast between the saddle and the barrique to complete and to ensure stability, compensating any dimensional variations, especially in the diameters of the barriques.
The invention shall now be better understood by following the description and the accompanying drawing, which shows non-limiting practical embodiments of the invention. In the drawing:
The barriques B1 and B2 are positioned in the seats 161 and 162 either directly or with the aid of wedges, depending upon the diameter of the barriques in the rest areas of the seat on the saddles 15.
In the embodiment shown in
In both embodiments described (either with one or two seats) housings for the forks of a lifting means (forklifts or similar) or other lifting devices are provided, said housings being preferably formed by the connecting bars 5 and 20. In some preferred embodiments, the tubular bars 5 and 20 for connecting the two saddles 2 and 15 and which form said housings for the forks of the lifting means or forklifts (which, in this way, are guided in a simple manner), have an over-dimensioned cross-section at least in horizontal direction, in order to make the insertion of the forks of the lifting means easy and to receive within the windows or apertures formed in said bars also forks with slightly different center distance.
The construction of the structures as described—duly treated at least on the visible surfaces—is suitable both for industrial stacking of the barriques in wide rooms suitable for the purpose, as well as for an arrangement aesthetically equivalent to that currently formed with stacking elements of the traditional type. Therefore, the equipment as described above allows to organize also rooms for exhibition to the customers, irrespective of the use in the “industrial” field.
It is understood that the drawing merely shows an example provided purely as a practical embodiment of the invention, which may vary in forms and arrangements without however departing from the scope of the concept underlying the invention. Any reference numbers in the appended claims are provided for the sole purpose of facilitating reading in the light of the description and the drawing, and do not in any manner limit the scope of protection represented by the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
FI2007A0126 | Apr 2007 | IT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2763383 | McCoy | Sep 1956 | A |
3019916 | Malcher | Feb 1962 | A |
4431107 | Bergstrom et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4488649 | Mark | Dec 1984 | A |
4506796 | Thompson | Mar 1985 | A |
5720397 | Thompson | Feb 1998 | A |
5913527 | Hailston | Jun 1999 | A |
5984119 | Uhl | Nov 1999 | A |
6050538 | Marrow et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6290074 | Syvuk et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302414 | Berthiaume et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6637607 | Tombu | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7195257 | Stoneback et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7448505 | DeMent | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7494308 | Chun | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20060081549 | Gracia Lecina | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060131825 | Stoneback et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 953 305 | Nov 1999 | EP |
659 005 | Oct 1951 | GB |
1 153 947 | Jun 1969 | GB |
WO 0058162 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0243529 | Jun 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080283436 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |