The present invention generally relates to the field of sport equipment. In particular, the present invention is directed to a supportive sport boot made of rigid materials.
Various sports, such as alpine, alpine/touring and telemark skiing, require boots that support the foot, ankle and, to varying degrees, the lower leg. All three of the above disciplines have these basic requirements. There are differences in the functional details and degree of support, but all three require that the foot, ankle and lower leg be supported in such a way that the range of motion is controlled within a specific range and that there is a specific resistance within the allowed range of motion that provides feedback to the skier and allows forces to be transmitted from the skier to the ski that would otherwise be impossible or difficult to apply.
As the need for more support developed, ski boot designs became stiffer and stiffer. Early ski boots were made from leather, then plastic coated leather, then designs eventually settled on the use of thermoplastic injection molded elastomers, such as thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), polyamides, and blends such as Pebax®. Injection molded thermoplastics have been in use almost exclusively since the early 1970s.
There were some attempts to use fiberglass in the 1970s, notably the Raichle “Red Hot” ski boot. This boot would have been impossible to put on or take off due to the extremely rigid materials used. Raichle overcame the rigid nature of the materials by using a hinge along the sole that allowed the boot to split open from the top, toe to heel, and a leather upper that allowed forward flexing of the skier's ankle. Since the lower could not flex at all and maintained a fixed volume regardless of how it was closed, Raichle also had to provide for a way to fit the volume of the lower to various foot volumes and shapes. The following three problems, i.e., fixed volume lower, unnatural method of entry/exit and difficulty of mating a leather upper for forward flex to the rigid lower, prevented this boot design from achieving lasting success.
Recently, Lange/Rossignol attempted to use stiff composites to build competition ski boots for their sponsored World Cup skiers (see European Patent Publication No. EP1295540 B1, titled “Skiboot”). Lange/Rossingnol made several experimental ski boots using different combinations of composite materials. However, it appears those efforts have not yet resulted in any commercial ski boots incorporating the experimental concepts. The current inventor believes that one challenge the Lange/Rossignol designers may not have overcome is devising an entry/exit strategy that accommodates the extreme stiffness of the experimental boots due to the composites.
The only commercial use of composite materials in ski boot construction has been as inserts that are over-molded during the traditional injection molding of thermoplastics. For example, a small, shaped plate of composite material is prepared and then placed in a modified ski boot mold. Thermoplastic polyurethane, or other similar thermoplastic, is then injection molded around and partially over the insert to make it an integral part of the boot. This method uses the stiffness, strength and light weight of the composite material in areas of the boot where it can do the most good. However, it is not very economical as it requires very expensive molds, very expensive materials and very expensive preparation of the insert. Also, the weight and stiffness advantages of the composite materials are nearly erased by the heavy, rubbery thermoplastics that largely fail to efficiently transmit the forces they were designed to carry. Consequently these inserts are regarded primarily as cosmetic.
In one implementation, the present disclosure is directed to a sport boot. The sport boot includes a shell that includes: a leg portion that has a shin region and a highback leg support region that acts to firmly support a portion of a leg of a person when the person is using the sport boot; a foot portion for receiving a foot of the person when the person is using the sport boot, the foot portion having an instep region and an instep transition region providing a directional transition between the instep region and the shin region of the leg portion, the foot portion including a toe end, a heel end and a sole portion, the sole portion extending from the toe end to the heel end, the foot portion having a lateral portion and a medial portion and being substantially rigid in a direction parallel to a longitudinal vertical plane that bisects the foot portion into the lateral portion and the medial portion; a heel pocket for inhibiting movement of a heel of the person in a direction away from the sole portion when the person is using the sport boot; and a heel track extending between the highback support region and the heel pocket and forming a concave space interior to the shell, the heel track receiving the heel of the person to accommodate the substantial rigidity of the foot portion in the direction parallel to the longitudinal vertical plane when the person is inserting the foot into the sport boot.
In another implementation, the present disclosure is directed to a boot liner for a sport boot. The boot liner includes a body made of a compressible material and having a shape that snugly fits a human foot and lower leg and that fits a boot shell that includes: a throat region having a dorsal heel track for aiding a user in inserting the human foot and lower leg into the boot shell when the boot liner is present in the boot shell; and a heel pocket for receiving the heel of the human foot when the human foot is fully inserted into the boot shell; the body including a leg portion containing an expandable dorsal region in registration with the heel track when the boot liner is present in the boot shell, the expandable dorsal region configured to temporarily expand the leg portion to an expanded configuration from an un-expanded configuration to allow the heel of the human foot to readily enter the heel track when the person is inserting the human foot into the boot shell and configured to contract from the expanded configuration when the heel is seated in the heel pocket.
In still another implementation, the present disclosure is directed to a sport boot system. The sport boot system includes a shell that includes: a leg portion that has a shin region and a highback leg support region that acts to firmly support a portion of a leg of a person when the person is using the sport boot system; a foot portion for receiving a foot of the person when the person is using the sport boot system, the foot portion having an instep region and an instep transition region providing a directional transition between the instep region and the shin region of the leg portion, the foot portion including a toe end, a heel end and a sole portion, the sole portion extending from the toe end to the heel end, the foot portion having a lateral portion and a medial portion and being substantially rigid in a direction parallel to a longitudinal vertical plane that bisects the foot portion into the lateral portion and the medial portion; a heel pocket for inhibiting movement of a heel of the person in a direction away from the sole portion when the person is using the sport boot system; and a heel track extending between the highback support region and the heel pocket and forming a concave space interior to the shell, the heel track receiving the heel of the person to accommodate the substantial rigidity of the foot portion in the direction parallel to the longitudinal vertical plane when the person is inserting the foot into the sport boot system; and a liner made of a compressible material and having a shape that snugly fits the foot and the lower leg and that fits into the shell, the liner including a leg portion containing an expandable dorsal region in registration with the heel track when the liner is present in the shell, the expandable dorsal region configured to expand the leg portion to an expanded configuration to allow the heel of the foot to readily enter the heel track when the person is inserting the foot into the sport boot system and configured to contract from the expanded configuration when the heel is seated in the heel pocket.
For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show aspects of one or more embodiments of the invention. However, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, wherein:
General Configuration
Referring now to the drawings,
Important features of sport-boot configuration 100 are a heel-track 108, a highback support region 112 and a distinct heel pocket 116. (It is noted that for the sake of the following explanation that shell 104 has a substantially uniform thickness (e.g., +/−1 mm) throughout, such that the external curves shown in
Highback support region 112 provides a support region at the rear of sport-boot configuration 100 that cooperates with a shin support region 128 to provide the necessary firm engagement of shell 104 with the leg of the wearer. In the context of alpine, touring and telemark ski boots, highback support region 112 and shin support region 128 form a cuff that generally mimics the cuff portion of a conventional sport boot. Heel pocket 116 provides a distinctive region at the rear of shell 104 that receives the heel (not shown) of the wearer when the wearer's foot is fully inserted into the shell. Heel pocket 116 firmly holds the wearer's heel, inhibiting it from moving sideways and upward during use of the shell 104 for its intended purpose. Heel-track 108 and heel pocket 116 are separated from one another, at least in functionality, by a transition 132 that essentially defines the lower end of the heel track and the upper end of the heel pocket. Without transition 132, it should be understood that heel pocket 116 would have significantly diminished vertical heel-holding ability.
As those skilled in the art know, composites are orders of magnitude stiffer and stronger than thermoplastics. These physical properties present to the ski boot industry both performance opportunities and design challenges that have so far been insurmountable. At first impression, to those knowledgeable in the art, composites would not seem to be a good choice for a product that needs to be flexible. However, since composites are both stronger and stiffer, the excess strength allows a designer to reduce the thickness of the material proportionately. By happenstance, the ratio of strength to stiffness of some composites is such that reducing the material thickness to maintain comparable strength also results in the flexural stiffness changing in a way that maintains the same flexural stiffness and feel as conventional ski boot materials. For example, when a composite-laminate ski boot is designed properly, it can have the same strength and feel as a 5 mm thick conventional ski boot material using only a 1 mm thick composite material, with the added benefits of a 75% reduction in weight and hundreds of times increase in stiffness in the in-plane direction that affects performance, with little or no effect on the flexural feel of the boot.
In-plane stiffness is the stiffness in tension and compression verses the flexural stiffness or resistance to bending. Deflection of the ski boot sidewalls in the tension/compression (in-plane) direction results in lateral instabilities in the ski boot. These deflections require the skier to make edge angle adjustment continually as loads increase and decrease. They also lead to edge “chatter.” As the boot sidewalls deflect in response to edging loads, the ski edge angle is reduced to the point where the ski disengages with the snow. The sudden release of the loads causes the boot to relax and returns the ski to the original edge angle, which causes the loads to build up again, deflecting the boot sidewalls, etc., etc. The frequency and amplitude of this cyclical “chatter” is dictated by the mass of the ski boot and the in-plane stiffness of the boot sidewalls. By reducing the mass and increasing the stiffness one can increase the frequency and more importantly reduce the amplitude of the “chatter.” If one reduces the mass and increases the stiffness sufficiently, the amplitude will always be less than the ski edge engagement with the snow and there will be no “chatter” at all. The bottom line is that a properly designed composite boot can be 50% to 75% lighter, hundreds of times stiffer in tension and compression, with the same flexural feel as a conventional thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) ski boot. These properties can provide the following advantages:
A composite ski boot design must solve three primary problems to be successful. A first problem is presented by the high in-plane stiffness of a boot shell made of a composite material. In areas of the boot where there is significant compound curvature, the in-plane stiffness contributes to flexural stiffness and makes these areas very resistant to any deflection. Fortunately, this has little or no negative effect on performance, fit or feel. It does, however, make getting the boot on and off your foot very difficult. This is due to the fact that one of the areas of the boot with the most severe compound curvature is the instep area of the foot, precisely the area that must deflect the most to open the boot enough to get your foot to pass through the throat of the boot. This is also a problem with all conventional thermoplastic front entry boots, but it is not nearly as severe as it would be with a highly rigid composite boot.
The ski industry has tried to address this problem for decades with various designs. In the 1970s and 1980s rear entry boots solved this problem with a mechanical solution that allowed the back of the boot to pivot open, thus widening the throat sufficiently to allow easy entry. In the 1980s the poor performance of the rear entry boot was recognized and Lange developed a mid-entry boot with a more conventional, high performance, shell and an upper that could tilt back enough to gain easy entry. It was sufficiently successful that it displaced the rear entry boot from the market. However, the extra mechanical parts had a negative impact on performance, and the market, unwilling to compromise on performance, eventually returned to a front entry design and accepted the entry problem as a necessary compromise.
A second problem is presented by the processing limitation of composite materials. Composite materials are available as consolidated sheets of fibers and matrix resin that can be cured and/or formed with pressure and/or heat, as fabrics that are cut and placed dry then impregnated with matrix resin under pressure and/or heat, or as fabrics that are pre-impregnated then cut, placed and cured or thermoformed with pressure and/or heat. This means that it is very difficult to form a complete ski boot shell in one piece. The present invention seeks to disclose preferred methods of construction to divide, form and join various pieces that can be assembled into the major components of a ski boot or a complete ski boot.
A third problem is the detailed features of the boot sole required to conform to standards that assure boot to ski binding compatibility, such as International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards ISO5355 and ISO9523. The processing limitations and other properties of composites make forming such details extremely difficult. To avoid these difficulties, a thermoplastic injection molded sole must be joined to the composite lower shell. The present invention seeks to disclose preferred methods and constructions to achieve this joining.
A successful composite boot must solve the three problems just described without resorting to complicated performance-sapping mechanical solutions. This disclosure presents a number of unique broad concepts for solving those problems without resorting to those undesirable solutions. The unique concepts disclosed herein include:
Referring now to
In this connection and referring still to
The high-volume throat shape that interior concave shape 300 (
Removal of the foot first requires opening the securement device(s), forcing the foot slightly forward and then lifting the heel straight upwards until it falls into interior concave shape 300 of heel track 232. This requires flaps 244 of lower shell 212 to open only enough to allow the foot, in this example, to move forward about 8 mm and upward about 30 mm. After that, the wearer's heel falls into heel track 232 and flaps 244 are not required to open significantly further. In contrast, in a conventional ski boot, a wearer's heel must be able to move at least 30 mm forward and 100 mm upward to remove the foot and the instep flaps of such a conventional boot must be able to accommodate this relatively large movement with acceptably low resistance.
The radius of curvature R′ and the location of center of curvature 236 are designed such that heel track 232 does not infringe upon a highback support region 260 at the top, back, of upper shell 208. Highback support region 260 provides backward support for the skier. Forces applied to the back of the leg by highback support region 260 can be very high, and if the surface area of this region is insufficient and/or the pressure is not evenly distributed, it can be very uncomfortable for the skier. Consequently, the design of ski boot 200 provides highback support region 260 with sufficient area and a proper shape to transmit the necessary forces of skiing efficiently and comfortably.
In this example, lower shell 212 should be very stiff for performance reasons and only flexible enough to accommodate proper fit to various foot shapes and volumes, for example, a high instep/high volume foot vs. and a flat/low volume foot. Relatedly, ankle flex in this example is provided primarily by upper shell 208. Lower shell 212 is the foundation, or chassis, of ski boot 200 and should be designed with a minimum of compromises in stiffness. However, in conventional boots the maximum stiffness is limited to that which will still allow reasonable ease of entry/exit, thus compromising performance. The unique shape described above eliminates this constraint on maximizing performance and makes possible the use of composite materials.
In one embodiment, the material used to make lower shell 212 is a light-weight, high-performance composite. Examples of composite materials for lower shell 212 include materials comprising high-strength reinforcement encased in a polymer matrix. Examples of suitable high-strength reinforcement include carbon fibers, carbon fabric, glass fiber, glass fabric, Kevlar fibers and Kevlar fabric, among others (KEVLAR is a registered trademark of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Del.). Examples of suitable polymers for the matrix include, but are not limited to, thermoset epoxy resins, thermoplastic nylon resins, TPU resins and polypropylene resins. Such materials may be used as a single layer composite, or may be laminated with one or more other like or differing layers to form a composite laminate. Composite laminates can be designed so that the ratio of tensile stiffness to flexural stiffness is maximized. For example, a 4-ply glass/carbon/carbon/glass laminate (carbon core/glass skin laminate) will have a higher ratio of tensile stiffness to flexural stiffness than a glass core/carbon skin laminate.
In this embodiment, the material used to make upper shell 208 is also a high-performance composite, but can be less stiff than the material used for lower shell 212. Examples of a suitable composite for upper shell 208 include, but are not limited to, a TEGRIS® or PURE® polypropylene/polypropylene composite and a TEPEX® polyester/TPU composite.
As seen in
Referring to
A further benefit of a flange construction is that the entire lower 500 (
Referring now to
Leg portion 808 includes an expandable dorsal region 820 that, when boot liner 800 is inserted into ski boot 200 (
In other embodiments wherein at least leg portion 808 is made of a single piece of material, for example, a single molding, the discontinuity at the expandable dorsal region can be, for example, a slit in which the lateral edges touch one another when the expandable dorsal region is in its un-expanded configuration, an elongated opening in which the lateral edges do not touch one another when the expandable dorsal region is in its un-expanded configuration or, depending on the material(s) used for the leg portion, a thinned region of the leg portion in which the lateral edges are defined by the thinning of the material to create the expandable dorsal region. In one example, discontinuity 820 starts at approximately 80 mm above the sole 832 of boot liner 800 at the heel of the liner and ends approximately 230 mm above the sole.
As seen in
Stretchable closure 1004 may be made of any suitable fairly highly stretchable material(s), such as spandex or other fabric having highly elastic fibers integrated therein or fabric-covered elastic band. In some embodiments, it may be desirable to provide stretchable closure 1004 and/or regions of leg portion 808 proximate discontinuity 828 with a low-friction coating to decrease frictional resistance between heel 824 (
Exemplary embodiments have been disclosed above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, omissions and additions may be made to that which is specifically disclosed herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/145,146, filed on Jan. 16, 2009, and titled “Ski Boot Made From Composite Materials,” which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3718994 | Spier | Mar 1973 | A |
3775872 | Rathmell | Dec 1973 | A |
4154009 | Kubelka et al. | May 1979 | A |
4268931 | Salomon | May 1981 | A |
4428130 | Perotto | Jan 1984 | A |
4720926 | Marxer | Jan 1988 | A |
4813668 | Solloway | Mar 1989 | A |
5068985 | Pozzebon | Dec 1991 | A |
5595006 | Perrissoud et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5678331 | Bonaventure | Oct 1997 | A |
6026596 | Seidel | Feb 2000 | A |
6253467 | Maravetz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6622402 | Challande | Sep 2003 | B2 |
20020088146 | Joseph et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030097766 | Morgan | May 2003 | A1 |
20040148807 | Grandin | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060064904 | Confortin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1295540 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1527706 | May 2005 | EP |
9624266 | Aug 1996 | WO |
9726947 | Jul 1997 | WO |
0051458 | Sep 2000 | WO |
2009097550 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Related PCT Application No. US09/69011 filed Dec. 21, 2009, entitled Supportive Sport Boot Made of Rigid Materials; David J. Dodge. |
Martin Olson, Ski Canad, Fall 2003, Boot Opening. As boot manufacturers fine-tune the balance between comfort and performance, features like anti-skid soles and ski-binding integration give even more reason to consider new boots this year, Gear Guide '04, pp. 82-89. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 6, 2010 for related application PCT/US2009/069011 filed Dec. 21, 2009 entitled “Supportive Sport Boot Made of Rigid Materials,” DODGE. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100180471 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61145146 | Jan 2009 | US |