1. Field of Invention
This application relates, in general, to a wake system for a watercraft, and more particularly, to a surf wake system for modifying a wake produced by a watercraft travelling through water.
2. Description of Related Art
Wake surfing has become increasingly popular in recent years because, unlike an ocean wave, a wake produced by a watercraft is on-demand not to mention continuous and endless as long as the watercraft is moving forward. As a watercraft travels through water, the watercraft displaces water and thus generates waves including bow wave and diverging stern waves on both sides of the watercraft. Due to pressure differences, these waves generally converge in the hollow formed behind the traveling watercraft and/or interfere with each other to form a wake behind the watercraft. Such a wake, however, is generally small, choppy or too close to the watercraft to be suitable and safe for water sports, and particularly not suitable for wake boarding or surfing.
To facilitate surfing, a wake should be formed away from the stern of the watercraft, for example, about ten feet away, and with a waist-height peak, for example, about three feet or higher. Generally hundreds, and sometimes thousands, of pounds of additional weight or ballast to a rear corner of the watercraft to make the watercraft tilt to one side, displaces more water, and hence generates a larger wake on that side. Such additional weight may be in the form of removable ballast bags, installed ballast tanks or bladders, or passengers positioned to one side of the watercraft, which is primarily used to tip the watercraft to that side. Using such additional weight to produce larger wakes, however, poses several disadvantages. For example, such additional weight may take up significant space and capacity that may otherwise reduce the passenger capacity of the watercraft. Also, such additional weight may unbalance the watercraft creating difficulties in control. Moreover, the additional weight generally must be moved from one side of the water craft to the other in order to generate a wake on the other side of the water craft. Shifting such additional weight may require significant time and effort. For example, filling and emptying ballast tanks to switch from one side to the other may require 20 minutes or more.
Alternatively, it is known to require extensive modification to a boat hull to promote a proper surf wake. An exemplar of generating a larger wake can be found in a U.S. Pat. No. 6,105,527 to Lochtefeld et al.
In light of the foregoing, it would therefore be useful to provide surf wake system that overcomes the above and other disadvantages.
One aspect of the present invention is directed to a surf wake system for modifying a wake formed by a watercraft travelling through water. The surf wake system may include a pair of upright water diverters including a port diverter and a starboard diverter, each independently movable from a neutral position to a deployed position in which a respective water diverter extends outboard of a transom of the watercraft to deflect water traveling along a hull of the watercraft and past the transom. Positioning the port diverter in its deployed position while the starboard diverter is in its neutral position modifies the wake to provide a starboard surf wake, and positioning the starboard diverter in its deployed position while the port diverter is in its neutral position modifies the wake to provide a port surf wake.
In the deployed position, the respective water diverter may extend outboard beyond a side strake of the watercraft to deflect water traveling along the side strake and past the transom.
Each upright water diverter may be pivotally mounted to the watercraft adjacent the transom or a respective side strake.
Each upright water diverter may be pivotally mounted to directly to the transom or a respective side strake.
The surf wake system may include a plurality of positioners operably connected to a respective water diverter for positioning the respective water diverter relative to a longitudinal axis of the watercraft.
At least one of the plurality of positioners may be a linear actuator configured to selectively move a respective water diverter between its neutral and extended positions.
Another aspect of the present invention is directed to a surf wake system including a flap for deflecting water traveling past a transom of the watercraft, a hinge for pivotally mounting the flap relative to the watercraft, the hinge having a pivot axis extending adjacent and along a side edge of the transom, and a positioner operably connected to the flap for positioning the flap relative to a longitudinal axis of the watercraft between a neutral position and an outward position.
The flap may include a substantially planar member.
The flap may be approximately 10-15 inches high and approximately 15-20 inches long.
The flap may be formed of plastic, stainless steel, wood and/or fiberglass.
The hinge may be a jointed device having a first member pivotally affixed to a second member by a pin, wherein the first member is affixed to the watercraft and the second member is affixed to the flap.
The second member may be monolithically formed with the flap.
The actuator may be dimensioned and configured to pivotally move and position the flap between the neutral position, in which the flap pulls inboard, and the extended position, in which the flap extends outboard.
The flap may extend outboard at least approximately 5-15° relative to a longitudinal axis of the watercraft.
The surf wake system may include a manual actuator to selectively position the flap.
The surf wake system may include a controller installed within the watercraft and operably connected to the actuator to selectively position the flap.
The controller may include a display panel for displaying an indication of a position of the flap.
The surf wake system may include a plurality of flaps and hinges, each flap pivotally mounted to the watercraft by a respective hinge.
The plurality of flaps may include a port flap and a starboard flap, each mounted adjacent respective port side and starboard side edges.
The positioner may include a plurality of actuators each secured on the watercraft and operably connected to a respective one of the plurality of flaps.
The surf wake system may include a controller installed within the watercraft and operably connected to the plurality of the actuators to selectively position the plurality of the flaps.
In various embodiments, positioning the port flap in the outward position and the starboard flap in the neutral position enhances a right surf wake, and wherein positioning the starboard flap in the outward position and the port flap in the neutral position enhances a left surfing wake.
The methods and apparatuses of the present invention have other features and advantages which will be apparent from or are set forth in more detail in the accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein, and the following Detailed Description, which together serve to explain certain principles of the present invention.
A water-sports boat can include a rudder (e.g., reference number 71 in
Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments of the present invention(s), examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and described below. While the invention(s) will be described in conjunction with exemplary embodiments, it will be understood that present description is not intended to limit the invention(s) to those exemplary embodiments. On the contrary, the invention(s) is/are intended to cover not only the exemplary embodiments, but also various alternatives, modifications, equivalents and other embodiments, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Generally, the present invention relates to a surf wake system for a watercraft that is concerned with flow management of water passing the stern as the water craft is moving forward through a body of water, so that water is directed in such a manner to enhance size, shape and/or other characteristics the resulting wake of the watercraft. As will become apparent below, the surf wake system of the watercraft allows diversion of water passing along one side of the stern away from the usual converging area immediately behind the transom of the watercraft, so that the diverging water will enhance the resulting wake on the opposing side of the watercraft. In doing so, the surf wake system of the present invention allows the enhancement of wake without significant pitching or leaning of the watercraft to one side or the other.
Turning now to the drawings, wherein like components are designated by like reference numerals throughout the various figures, attention is directed to
In the illustrated embodiment, the water diverters are in the form of flaps 33, pivotally mounted on respective hinges 37, which have a pivot axis 39 extending adjacent and along a side edge 40 of the transom. Although the illustrated embodiment shows the flaps mounted directly on the transom, one will appreciate that the flaps may be moveably mounted directly or indirectly to the transom. For example, the flaps and associated hardware may be mounted on a removable swim platform other structure that is mounted on or adjacent the transom.
As also shown in
Turning now to
In general, a distance L between a respective pivot axis and the side edge is less than the longest dimension of the flap in order to allow the flap to extend parallel to the side strake of the hull or beyond. The distance is preferably less than 10-5 inches and more preferably less than 5 inches. That is, the flaps are positioned away from an imaginary center line or longitudinal axis of the watercraft and adjacent a respective port side or starboard side.
For illustration purposes, the pivot axis of the hinge shown in this application is drawn parallel to the corresponding side edge. One will appreciate that the pivot axis does not necessary need to be parallel to the corresponding side edge. One will also appreciate that the pivot axis may be substantially vertical, substantially parallel to the side edge, some other angle therebetween, or some angle slightly inclined with respect to the side edge. Preferably the angle between the pivot axis and the side edge is less than approximately 15°, more preferably less than 10°, and even more preferably less than 5°.
With reference to
In various embodiments, the actuators may be electric actuators of the type manufactured by Lenco Marine Inc. which include a linearly-extendable threaded rod assembly driven by a step motor. In various embodiments, the actuator may be configured to move between an inner retracted position and an outer extended position, while in other embodiments, the actuators are configured to also move to one or more interim positions, for example, every 5°, 10°, 15°, etc. By activating the actuator for predetermined periods of time, the actuator may be accurately and repeatedly controlled to move to the desired position. One will appreciate that the actuator may be configured to accommodate a wide variety of angular ranges as well as interim positions.
One will also appreciate that other actuators may be utilized in accordance with the present invention. For example. hydraulic and pneumatic actuators may be used, as well as manual actuators.
Turning now to
One will appreciate that the surf wake system of the present invention may be configured to hold the flaps in one or more interim positions between their respective outward and neutral positions. For example, the surf wake system may be configured to hold the flaps at 0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°, 30° and etc. relative to the centerline. Such interim positions may allow the system to further modify or incrementally modify the resulting wake, and may thus accommodate surfer preferences. For example, such interim positions may more precisely shape the wake to accommodate for specific watercraft setup, watercraft speed, watercraft weight, passenger weight variances and distributions, and other variables to provide a desired wake shape and waveform. Moreover, a number of interim positions may optimize waveform for various other parameters such user preferences. For example, experienced surfers may prefer larger faster wakes, while novice surfers may want a smaller, slower manageable wake.
As a watercraft travels through water, the watercraft displaces water and generates waves including bow waves and diverging stern waves. Due to pressure differences and other phenomena, these waves generally converge in the hollow formed behind the watercraft and interfere with each other to form an otherwise conventional wake behind the watercraft, such as that shown in
By moving a flap of the present invention to an outward position, however, water is redirected, which may lead to constructive interference to form a larger wake having a higher peak and a smoother face, which wake is conducive for surfing. In addition, the flap may redirect water so that the larger wake is formed further away from the watercraft, and thus creating a safer environment for surfing. Moreover, by placing the flaps along the side edges, the watercraft can generate a suitable surfing wake with less tilt or lean to one side, thus making the watercraft easier to control. One will appreciate that the flaps may enhance wake shape and size with or without the use of significant additional weight or ballast located toward the rear corners of the watercraft. Other advantages will become apparent later on in the description of the operation of the present invention.
In various embodiments of the present invention, the wake system may include one or more flap assemblies, for example, one or more port flap assemblies, and/or one or more starboard flap assemblies may be used. Preferably, the wake system is configured and positioned to have one flap and corresponding hinge immediately adjacent each of the port side edge and the starboard side edge.
In various embodiments of the present invention, the flap is a substantially planar member, as can be seen in
In the illustrated embodiment, the flap is approximately 14 inches high, approximately 17 inches long and approximately ¾ inch thick. One will appreciate that the actual dimensions of the flap may vary. Preferably, the flap is approximately 10-18 inches high, approximately 12-22 inches long, and approximately ½ to 1¼ inches thick, and more preferably approximately 12-16 inches high, 15-19 inches long, and ¾ to 1 inch thick. One will appreciate that the deeper the flap extends below the waterline, the more water will be diverted.
In addition, one will appreciate that the flap need not be planar and its actual dimensions will vary depending on the size of the watercraft, the demand of the type of the wake and/or other factors. Other suitable configurations and sizes can be employed, including curved surfaces, curved edges, different geometric profiles, and/or different surface textures. The flap can be made of plastic, stainless steel, fiberglass, composites, and/or other suitable materials. For example, the flap may be formed of gelcoated fiberglass and/or stainless trim plate.
As shown in
Turning back to
An exemplary method of operating the surf wake system in exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be explained with reference to
As shown in
Turning to
Turning to
As noted before, the watercraft equipped with the surf wake system of the present invention can generate a suitable surfing wake with or without adding significant extra weight at a rear corner of the watercraft. As such, weight need not be moved from one side to another, and thus no significant shifting of the watercraft from one side to the other is not required, and thus there are no significant changes to the handling of the watercraft. The surf wake system of the present invention allows switching from a port side wake to a starboard wake, or vice versa, on demand or “on the fly” thus accommodating both regular (or natural) and goofy surfers, as well as surfers that are sufficiently competent to switch from a port side wake to a starboard wake while under way. To this end, the controller is preferably configured to allow operation of the actuators on-demand and on-the-fly.
In addition to modifying wakes for recreational purposes, the water diverters of the surf wake system may be activated for other purposes such as steering assist. For example, the port flap may be actuated to provide turning assist to the left at gear idle, and similarly the starboard flap actuated to provide turning assist to the right. Thus, with an appropriate flap extended, the watercraft may turn within a very small radius around a fallen skier, boarder or surfer. Also, it is sometimes difficult for inboard watercraft to turn to left while moving backwards, the flaps may be activated to assist in such maneuvering. One will appreciate that the control system may be configured to utilize input from the steering system and/or the drive system to determine an appropriate level of “turning assist”. For example, the control system may be configured such that turning assist would only work below a predetermined speed, for example 7 mph. One will also appreciate that such turning assist may utilize controls that that are integrated into the surf wake system, or alternatively, such turning assist may utilize discrete controls to that are separately activated in accordance with the needs of turning assistance.
Turning now to
Display 63 is configured to convey a variety of desired information such as speed of the watercraft, water depth, and/or other useful information concerning the watercraft and operation thereof including, but not limited to, various service alerts, such as low oil pressure, low battery voltage, etc., and/or operational alerts such as shallow water, bilge pump status, etc.
Input device 65. is primarily configured to receive a variety of input commands from the watercraft operator. In accordance with the present invention, and with reference to
One will appreciate that other suitable input means may be utilized to activate the flaps. For example, a graphic or virtual slide assembly may be provided to activate the flaps as to the desired degree left or right, or a plurality of graphic or virtual buttons may be provided to activate the flaps to the desired degree left or right. In addition, one will appreciate that mechanical and/or electromechanical switches and input devices may also be used to activate the flaps as desired.
With reference to
Also, input device 65. may also provide various alerts regarding the operation of the surf wake system. For example,
In various embodiments, the surf wake system can be configured with various safety features which limit operation and/or alert the driver to various situations. For example, the system may be configured to provide a visual and/or audible alarm to alert the operator when the watercraft is traveling faster than a predetermined speed, for example 15 mph.
Control system 32 may also include a memory that is configured to store information regarding watercraft configuration including static parameters such as hull shape, hull length, weight, etc., as well as dynamic parameters passenger weight, ballast, wedge, speed, fuel, depth, wind, etc. The memory may also include “Rider” information regarding the surfer (or boarder or skier), including goofy/regular footed, weight, board length, board type, skill level, etc. Moreover, the memory may be configured to store “presets” that include the information regarding a specific “Rider” including the Rider information as well as the Rider's preferences such as left or right wave, a preferred watercraft speed, a preferred wake height, etc. One will appreciate that the presets could be for the surf wake system as well as other parameters including POWER WEDGE setting, watercraft speed, goofy/regular footed, steep wave face, amount of weight, wave size, etc. One will appreciate that such presets would allow the watercraft operator to quickly reconfigure the surf wake system to accommodate various “Riders”, for example very experienced professional wake surfers, beginner wake surfers, and anyone in between.
Control system 32 may also include a remote which may allow a rider to actuate the surf wake system. For example, a remote may allow a rider to further deploy or retract flap 33, to an interim position to vary the size of the wake.
One will appreciate that control system 32 may be integrated into the watercraft, for example, fully integrated with a CAN bus of the watercraft. Alternatively, the control system may be an aftermarket solution which may be installed on a watercraft, either connecting into the CAN bus, or operating completely independently of the CAN bus.
Turning now to
As shown in
Turning now to
In the illustrated embodiment, the actuators are mounted on the swim platform to selectively deploy the flaps, however, one will appreciate that the actuators may be mounted on the transom.
One will also appreciate that actuators 46, may be automated in a manner similar to that described above, for example, the actuators may be electric, electromechanical, pneumatic and/or hydraulic actuators as described above. In the case that the actuators are automated, the actuators may be integrated with the watercraft's existing control system (e.g., by connecting to the CAN bus of the watercraft), or a dedicated control system may be installed to control the actuators that is completely independent of the watercrafts other systems. For example, the control system may include toggle switches or other suitable devices to selectively move actuators 46, and flaps 33, as desired.
In operation and use, swim platform 70 functions in the same manner as that described above. The neutral position of surf wake system 32 is shown in
Similarly, when a surfable port side wake is desired, the operator may deploy the starboard side flap 33,s as shown in
In various embodiments and as noted above, the size and shape of the flaps may vary depending upon varies factors. One such variation is illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, the flap includes five channels, however, one will appreciate that one, two, three or more channels may be utilized to redirect the flow of water as desired. One will also appreciate that the channel need not be linear or horizontal. For example, the channels may extend at an incline upwardly away from transom 35 to direct the flow of water upwardly as it flows along the surface of flap 33, which may provide a net downward force on the flap and, in turn, the transom to further enhance displacement of the watercraft stern. Also, the channels may be curved in order to gently redirect water upwardly or downwardly. One will also appreciate that other patterns and/or textured surfaces may also be utilized to manage the direction of flow of water along the flap.
The peripheral shape of flap 33, is similar to that shown in
In various embodiments, the flaps may be planar or non-planar. For example,
One will appreciate that other flap shapes and configurations may also be utilized in accordance with the present invention, including, but not limited to, oval shaped flaps, other polygonal shapes, perforate surfaces, patterned surfaces, and etc. One will also appreciate that the flaps may be replaceable and interchangeable such that a user may replace flaps of one type with flaps of another type in order to further customize the performance of the surf wake system. Alternatively, supplemental “bolt-on” shapes may be provided which can be attached to an existing flap to further modify its overall shape.
In various embodiments, upper surfaces of the swim platform may be hinged to facilitate the flow of water past the swim platform. Conventional swim platforms generally impede waveform by suppressing water flow on surf side when boat is rolled to the same side. As shown in
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, surf wake system 32 is similar to the systems described above but includes flaps 33, that are mounted on the side of the hull instead of the transom, as shown in
One will appreciate that the various flap and actuator configurations described above may be utilized with a hull-side configuration.
In still another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, surf wake system 32 is similar to the systems described above but includes upright diverters in the form of upright flaps 33, that are mounted to extend rearward of transom 35, as shown in
One will appreciate that the various flap and actuator configurations described above may also be utilized with such a retractable flap configuration.
For convenience in explanation and accurate definition in the appended claims, the terms “inward” and “outward”, “inboard” and “outboard”, and etc. are used to describe features of the exemplary embodiments with reference to the positions of such features as displayed in the figures.
The foregoing descriptions of specific exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The exemplary embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain certain principles of the invention and their practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to make and utilize various exemplary embodiments of the present invention, as well as various alternatives and modifications thereof. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/545,969 filed Jul. 10, 2012, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/559,069 filed Nov. 12, 2011, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein for all purposes by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
667482 | Albarda | Feb 1901 | A |
704729 | Zerbe | Jul 1902 | A |
1196682 | Harriss | Aug 1916 | A |
1264320 | Metzler | Apr 1918 | A |
2199333 | Dunklin | Apr 1940 | A |
2663276 | Ouellet | Dec 1953 | A |
2807228 | Vandre | Sep 1957 | A |
2832304 | Elyosius et al. | Apr 1958 | A |
2890673 | Chadwick, Jr. | Jun 1959 | A |
2994290 | Merchant, Sr. | Aug 1961 | A |
3046928 | Sherrill | Jul 1962 | A |
3062167 | Bennett | Nov 1962 | A |
3106178 | Cale | Oct 1963 | A |
3111103 | Bennett | Nov 1963 | A |
3159134 | Winnen | Dec 1964 | A |
3200782 | Walden et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3247820 | White | Apr 1966 | A |
3259097 | Veldhuizen et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3294052 | Jones | Dec 1966 | A |
3327671 | Comins | Jun 1967 | A |
3372663 | Bue | Mar 1968 | A |
3391667 | Bue | Jul 1968 | A |
3399643 | Bennett | Sep 1968 | A |
3577948 | Frey | May 1971 | A |
3628484 | Banner | Dec 1971 | A |
3628486 | Bennett | Dec 1971 | A |
3628487 | Bennett | Dec 1971 | A |
3695204 | Bennett | Oct 1972 | A |
3698343 | Boome | Oct 1972 | A |
3760759 | Lang | Sep 1973 | A |
3763812 | Rowe | Oct 1973 | A |
4232626 | Kern | Nov 1980 | A |
4237808 | Doerffer | Dec 1980 | A |
4261278 | Gaudin | Apr 1981 | A |
4434738 | Barkemeyer | Mar 1984 | A |
4577580 | Diffely, Sr. | Mar 1986 | A |
4597742 | Finkl | Jul 1986 | A |
4718872 | Olson et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4776295 | Kline et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4854259 | Cluett | Aug 1989 | A |
4895093 | Dalsbo | Jan 1990 | A |
4967682 | O'Donnell | Nov 1990 | A |
5058520 | Fahrney | Oct 1991 | A |
5113780 | Bennett et al. | May 1992 | A |
5193478 | Mardikian | Mar 1993 | A |
5263432 | Davis | Nov 1993 | A |
5315951 | Finkl | May 1994 | A |
5359956 | Lee | Nov 1994 | A |
5377610 | Goebel | Jan 1995 | A |
5385110 | Bennett et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5445100 | Finkl | Aug 1995 | A |
5474012 | Yamada et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474013 | Wittmaier | Dec 1995 | A |
5549071 | Pigeon et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572944 | Slikkers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5628272 | Thomas | May 1997 | A |
5664910 | Lochtefeld et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5694337 | Macken | Dec 1997 | A |
5860384 | Castillo | Jan 1999 | A |
5860766 | Lochtefeld et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5881666 | Crews, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
5911190 | Lochtefeld et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6006689 | Olofsson | Dec 1999 | A |
6012408 | Castillo | Jan 2000 | A |
6026759 | Hazelett et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044788 | Larson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047657 | Cox | Apr 2000 | A |
6105527 | Lochtefeld et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6138601 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148756 | Pavlov et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158375 | Stuart, Jr. | Dec 2000 | A |
6213044 | Rodgers et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6354237 | Gaynor et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6520104 | Svensson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523489 | Simard et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523490 | Watkins | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6606959 | Shen | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6827031 | Aoyama | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6874441 | Pigeon | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6923136 | D'Alessandro | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6935263 | Bandyopadhyay | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941884 | Moore | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7004097 | Zeromski | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007621 | Bootes | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7018252 | Simard et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7063031 | Earl, Jr. et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7140318 | Gasper | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7174843 | Tossavainen | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7188581 | Davis et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7210422 | Hickok et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7216601 | Mann | May 2007 | B1 |
7246565 | Snook et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252047 | Baucom, Jr. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7252074 | Chapman et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7311058 | Brooks et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7318389 | Boning | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7380514 | Loui et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7381108 | Salmon | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7434531 | Zsido et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7467596 | Salmon | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7497748 | Salmon | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7641525 | Morvillo | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7707956 | Moore | May 2010 | B2 |
7780490 | Lundgren | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7905193 | Beamer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7958837 | Fraleigh | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8100079 | Buzzi | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8191493 | Baywol | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8201514 | Coles | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8216007 | Moore | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8251006 | Kalil | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8261682 | DeVito | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8387551 | Muller | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8468964 | Hoberman et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480445 | Morvillo | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8534214 | Gasper | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8539897 | Gasper et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8578873 | Gasper et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8622012 | Olofsson | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631753 | Morvillo | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8833286 | Sheedy et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8967070 | Kalil | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20040261684 | Pigeon | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050124234 | Sells et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050155540 | Moore | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060054067 | Hoberman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060217011 | Morvillo | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070078575 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070125287 | Walker | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137550 | Davis et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070202757 | Moore | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080271660 | Zsido et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281478 | Gee et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090165694 | Beamer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100121493 | Christensen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100251952 | Baywol | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110017115 | Olofsson | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110320072 | Morvillo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120079977 | Gai | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130213293 | Gasper et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140026799 | Kalil | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140102348 | Gasper | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140137786 | Gasper et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140137787 | Gasper et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140261135 | Gasper et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2271332 | Feb 2000 | CA |
1 435 325 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1 058 645 | Oct 2004 | EP |
332315 | Jul 1930 | GB |
975490 | Nov 1982 | SU |
WO 9620105 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 9955577 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 2005118384 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006058232 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007072185 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2009113923 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2011099931 | Aug 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
MasterCraft Surf Tab—Screenshots taken from video uploaded on May 26, 2010 at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1Q—MLRO31M. |
Tige Convex VX—Screenshots taken from video uploaded on Oct. 10, 2012 at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jx5QXC-dU9w. |
Centurion Wake Plate—Website dated Aug. 27, 2011—http://www.centurionboats.com/features-and-options/adjustable-wake-plate.html. |
Nautique Surf System—Released Jan. 3, 2013—Website printout from http://www.nautique.com/models/nautique-surf-system. |
Humphree Operator's Manual, dated 2009. |
Humphree Installation Manual, dated 2009. |
“Malibu Makes Boating Easier and More Fun With MaliView,” dated Sep. 4, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/666,204 including its prosecution history, filed Mar. 23, 2015, Gasper et al. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2012 for PCT/US2012/055788. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 25, 2013 for PCT/US2012/064504. |
Malibu's First Amended Complaint: Infringement of U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,539,897; 8,534,214; and 8,578,873, filed on Dec. 13, 2013 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Opening Brief on Its Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, filed on Nov. 14, 2013, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Opposition to Malibu's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, filed on Dec. 16, 2013 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Reply Brief on its Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed Dec. 23, 2013 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Volvo Penta—QL Boat Trim System Brochure—The Declaration of David Kennedy alleges that this brochure became publicly available prior to 2010. |
Volvo Penta—QL Boat Trim System User & Installation Instructions—The Declaration of David Kennedy alleges that these instructions became publicly available prior to 2010. |
Declaration of David Kennedy, dated Dec. 13, 2013, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Declaration of Kevin C. Breen in Support of Malibu's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, dated Nov. 12, 2013, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Declaration of Elliot L Stern, Ph.D., P.E. Regarding Non-Infringement and Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897, dated Dec. 16, 2013, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Supplemental Declaration of Kevin C. Breen in Support of Malibu's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, dated Dec. 23, 2013, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Declaration of Richard D. Hepburn, Regarding Claim Construction, Non-Infringement, and Invalidity, dated Dec. 16, 2013, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Declaration of Greg Meloon in Support of Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction, dated Dec. 14, 2013, in in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Malibu's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed Feb. 4, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories, dated Feb. 26, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Defendant's First Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-2), dated Apr. 18, 2014, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Opening Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement [Redacted Public Version], filed Jun. 26, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Exhibit 7 to Declaration of Mark Lezama in Support of Malibu's Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement [Redacted Public Version], filed Jun. 17, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement, filed Jun. 17, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Declaration of Kevin C. Breen in Support of Malibu's Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement [Redacted Public Version], filed Jun. 26, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Motion for Claim Term Interpretation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897, filed Aug. 26, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Motion for Claim Term Interpretation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,5378,873, filed Aug. 26, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Motion for Claim Term Interpretation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,534,214, filed Aug. 26, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Opposition to Malibu's Motion for Partial Summary Judgement, filed Aug. 29, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Response to Nautique's Second set of Interrogatories (No. 9), dated Apr. 21, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Malibu's Supplemental Response to Nautique's Interrogatories 2, 3, 7, and 8 with Exhibit 1, dated Sep. 4, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Malibu's Supplemental Response to Nautique's Interrogatories 1 and 6, dated Nov. 13, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Malibu's Opening Brief on its Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity Based on Svensson and Accompanying Declarations From Mark Lezama and Kevin Breen, filed Sep. 12, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Corrected Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity, filed Sep. 12, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement, filed Sep. 12, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Reply Brief on its Motion for Summary Judgement of Infringement [Redacted Version], filed Sep. 15, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Opposition to Nautique's Motion for Claim Interpretation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897, filed Sep. 19, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Opposition to Nautique's Motion for Claim Interpretation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,534,214, filed Sep. 19, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Opposition to Nautique's Motion for Claim Interpretation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,578,873, filed Sep. 19, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Reply to Opposition to Motion for Claim Interpretation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897, filed Sep. 29, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Reply to Opposition to Motion for Claim term Interpretation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,534,214, filed Sep. 29, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Reply to Opposition to Motion for Claim Interpretation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,578,873, filed Sep. 29, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Nautique's Opposition to Malibu's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity Based on Svensson, filed Oct. 6, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Malibu's Opposition to Nautique's Corrected Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity [Redacted Public Version], Filed Oct. 8, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Malibu's Opposition to Nautique's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement [Redacted Public Version], filed Oct. 8, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Declaration of Kevin Breen in Support of Malibu's Opposition to Nautique's Corrected Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity, filed Oct. 6, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Declaration of Kevin Breen in Support of Malibu's Opposition to Nautique's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement, filed Oct. 6, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Nautique's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity [Redacted Public Version], filed Oct. 17, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Malibu's Reply Brief on its Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity Based on Svensson, filed Oct. 17, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Nautique's Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringment [Redacted Version], filed Oct. 17, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Nautique's Supplemental Brief in Support of Pending Motions [Redacted Version], filed Dec. 9, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Malibu's Response to Nautique's Supplemental Brief, filed Dec. 22, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennesse. |
Transcript of Preliminary Injunction Hearing on Jan. 6, 2014. |
Transcript of Motion Hearing on Dec. 16, 2014. |
Malibu's slides presented during hearing on Dec. 16, 2014. |
Nautique's slides presented during hearing on Dec. 16, 2014. |
Malibu's Daubert Motion to Exclude Opinions on Inherency, filed Dec. 26, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion to Exclude Opinions on Inherency, filed Jan. 12, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Reply Brief on its Daubert Motion to Exclude Opinions on Inherency, filed Jan. 19, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Memorandum and Order for Daubert Motion, dated Jan. 26, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Expert Report of Kevin Breen [Redacted Version] (pp. 1-434), dated Nov. 21, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Expert Report of Kevin Breen [Redacted Version] (pp. 435-654), dated Nov. 21, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Rebuttal Expert Report of Kevin Breen [Redacted Version], dated Dec. 12, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Expert Report of Robert Taylor (pp. 1-444), dated Nov. 21, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Expert Report of Robert Taylor (pp. 445-914), dated Nov. 21, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Expert Supplemental Report of Robert Taylor, dated Dec. 5, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Transcript of Deposition of Kevin C. Breen [Redacted Version], dated Dec. 18, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Transcript of Deposition of Daniel Gasper [Redacted Version], dated Oct. 8, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Transcript of Deposition of Adam Andrew McCall [Redacted Version], dated Dec. 3, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Transcript of Deposition of Jack Springer [Redacted Version], dated Nov. 13, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Transcript of 30(b)(6) Deposition of Jack Springer [Redacted Version], dated Nov. 14, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Transcript of Deposition of Wayne Wilson [Redacted Version], dated Nov. 12, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Transcript of Deposition of Scott Davenport [Redacted Version], dated Dec. 3, 2014 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Transcript of Deposition of Robert Taylor, dated Jan. 7, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Memorandum and Order, dated Jan. 28, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. Nautique Boat Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-00656, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897, filed Jun. 27, 2014. |
Corrected Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897, filed Jul. 9, 2014. |
Patent Owner Malibu Boats' Preliminary Response to Nautique's Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897, filed Sep. 26, 2014. |
Decision of Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897, dated Nov. 26, 2014. |
Petitioner's Request for Rehearing, dated Dec. 5, 2014 in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897. |
Order Denying Petitioner's Request for Rehearing, dated Dec. 23, 2014 in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897. |
Expert Declaration of Robert K. Taylor, dated Jun. 25, 2014 in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,897. |
Malibu's Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed Jun. 29, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
MasterCraft's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims, filed Aug. 5, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
MasterCraft's Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement, filed Aug. 13, 2015, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
MasterCraft's Statement of Material Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement, filed Aug. 13, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Declaration of Michael D. Myers in Support of MasterCraft's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement, filed Aug. 13, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Answer to Counterclaim, filed Aug. 26, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Opposition to MasterCraft's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement, filed Sep. 3, 2015, in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Response to MasterCraft's Statement of Material Facts in Support of MasterCrafts's Motion for Summary Judgement of Noninfringment; Malibu's Statement of Additional Material Facts in Oppositions to Mastercraft's Motion for Summary Judgement, filed Sep. 3, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Mastercraft's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement, filed Sep. 14, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
MasterCraft's Reply to Malibu's Response to the Statement of Material Facts in Support of MasterCraft's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement, filed Sep. 14, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Surreply to MasterCraft's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement, filed Sep. 23, 2015 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Memorandum and Order Denying Motion for Summary Judgment, entered Feb. 11, 2016 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-00276 in the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Malibu's Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed Feb. 16, 2016 in Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Case No. 3:16-cv-00082 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. |
Letter from Edmund J. Haughey of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, dated Feb. 3, 2016. |
“Debut of new Sanger Surf Series,” Wake World forum having postings between Oct. 4, 2008 and Feb. 9, 2009, webpage archive of http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=632602 dated May 30, 2012, 171 pages. |
Screenshots taken from video titled “Surf Sanger,” uploaded on Apr. 30, 2008 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcVIZZ7QZus. |
Email from Edmund J. Haughey of of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130228113 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61559069 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13545969 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 13749500 | US |