BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of this invention, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of the first preferred embodiment of a surface acoustic wave substrate according to this invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the second preferred embodiment of the surface acoustic wave substrate according to this invention;
FIG. 3 is a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) photomicrograph of an aluminum nitride (AlN) layer of the second preferred embodiment, with the layer thickness of a second sub-layer of titanium nitride of a buffer layer being 30 nm;
FIG. 4 is a SEM photomicrograph of an aluminum nitride (AlN) layer of the second preferred embodiment, with the layer thickness of the second sub-layer of the buffer layer being 150 nm;
FIG. 5 is a SEM photomicrograph of an aluminum nitride (AlN) layer of the first comparative example which has no buffer layer between a piezoelectric layer and a diamond layer;
FIG. 6 is a SEM photomicrograph of an aluminum nitride (AlN) layer of the second comparative example which has a titanium layer between a piezoelectric layer and a diamond layer;
FIG. 7 is a X-ray diffractometer (XRD) graph for the first and second preferred embodiments and the first comparative example;
FIGS. 8 and 9 are loading test graphs for the first and second preferred embodiments and the first and second comparative examples;
FIG. 10 is a SEM photomicrograph of a cross-section of an aluminum nitride (AlN) layer of the second preferred embodiment, with the layer thickness of the second sub-layer of the buffer layer being 150 nm;
FIG. 11 is an atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of the second preferred embodiment, with the layer thickness of the second sub-layer of the buffer layer being 150 nm;
FIG. 12 is a photomicrograph of a transducer-forming surface of the aluminum nitride layer of the second preferred embodiment, with the layer thickness of the second sub-layer of the buffer layer being 150 nm; and
FIG. 13 is an insertion loss vs. frequency graph for the second preferred embodiment, with the layer thickness of the second sub-layer of the buffer layer being 150 nm.