The present invention relates to surface coated cutting tools (hereinafter referred to as “coated tools”).
A coated tool is known including a substrate composed of tungsten carbide (hereinafter denoted by WC) based cemented carbide, for example, and a coating layer on the substrate. Such coated tools exhibit high wear resistance. Various proposals have also been made on improvements in coating layers in order to enhance the durability of coated tools.
For example, Japanese Patent No. 4028891 discloses a tool including a substrate and a coating layer on the substrate, in which the coating layer has a composition represented by (TixZr1-x) (CyN1-y) (where 0.4<x<0.95, 0.2<y<0.9) having a face-centered cubic structure with a lattice constant of 0.403 to 0.455 nm or by (TixHf1-x) (CyN1-y) (where 0.4<x<0.95, 0.2<y<0.9) having a face-centered cubic structure with a lattice constant of 0.430 to 0.450 nm. Such a coating layer is hard and has high wear resistance.
US Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0298233 describes a coated tool (insert) including a substrate and a coating layer on the substrate, in which the coating layer is composed of fcc Ti1-xMex nitride (0.1≤x≤0.9, Me being one or more of Zr and Hf) having a lattice constant of 0.427 to 0.453 nm. The coating layer of the coated tool is hard and suitable for dry cutting of stainless steel.
An object of the present invention, which has been accomplished in view of the aforementioned circumstances and proposal, is to provide a coated tool having a coating layer with high hardness and improved toughness.
The surface coated cutting tool according to the embodiment of the present invention comprises:
where n=4 and m=2, ln represents the natural logarithm, and R represents the gas constant.
The surface coated cutting tool of the above embodiment may satisfy at least one of the following items (1) and (2):
(1) The complex carbonitride layer further contains at least one metallic component selected from the group consisting of Hf and Ta in atomic fractions of as and a6, respectively, wherein
The embodiment of the surface-coated cutting tool includes a coating layer having high hardness and high toughness.
Since the hardness and toughness of the coating layer of a surface-coated cutting tool are in a trade-off relationship, it is believed to be difficult to achieve both by the conventional solid solution strengthening theory.
Meanwhile, research has recently been conducted on solid solutions with increased entropy of mixing, such as high-entropy alloys, which consist of five or more elements mixed in substantially equal atomic proportions, and multi principal element alloys, which consist of three or more elements containing at least two or more principal elements. No research, however, are found on increasing the entropy of mixing in the coating layer of coated tools.
The inventor has made an extensive study on the solid solution (alloy) that constitutes the coating layer of the coated tool to achieve compatibility between high hardness and high toughness through increasing the entropy of mixing, which have been in trade-off relation and have not been achieved in conventional coating layers.
As a result, the inventor found that an increase in entropy in the complex carbonitride layer of a specific composition which constitutes the coating layer of the coated tool leads to:
The surface-coated cutting tools of the present invention will now be described.
Throughout the specification and the claims, a numerical range expressed as “L to M” (L and M are both numerical values) is synonymous with “L or more and M or less,” and the range includes the upper limit (M) and the lower limit (L). In the case that units are stated only for the upper limit, the units for the upper (M) and lower (L) limits are the same.
The complex carbonitride of (TiVZrNb) (may also be denoted as (TiVZrNb) (CN)), which constitutes the coating layer of the first embodiment, will now be described.
(TiVZrNb) (CN) has an atomic arrangement shown in
The average thickness of the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer, which is a complex carbonitride layer, should preferably be 1.0 μm or more and 20.0 μm or less, for the following reasons: An average thickness of less than 1.0 μm, which is significantly small, leads to insufficient durability of the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer. An average thickness exceeding 20.0 μm leads to ready formation of coarse crystal grains in the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer, resulting in frequent chipping. The average thickness of the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer should more preferably be 3.0 μm or more and 16.0 μm or less.
The (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer, which is a complex carbonitride layer, preferably has a composition represented by the chemical formula: (Tia1Va2Zra3Nba4) (Cb1Nb2), where the atomic fractions a1, a2, a3, a4, b1, b2 satisfy the following relations:
The layer may contain unintended or inevitable impurities that are introduced during the manufacturing process.
The atomic fractions a1, a2, a3, a4, b1 and b2 satisfying the relations causes the entropy of mixing of the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer to be enhanced, and the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer to have the advantageous effects (i)-(ii) found by the inventor.
The atomic fractions a1, a2, a3, a4, b1, and b2 should preferably be determined such that the configuration parameter Sconfig has a larger value. The upper limit for the calculation of the configuration parameter Sconfig is 1.04R.
Cl is inevitably contained in a very trace amount (an amount the presence of which can only just be confirmed by analysis by single-element detection of chlorine only) in the layer deposited by the CVD process using a chloride raw material gas. A Cl content of 0.50 atomic percent or less causes a lubricant (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer to be formed due to the effect of Cl. The Cl content (atomic percent) is defined by the percentage to all atoms of Ti, V, Zr, Nb, C, N, and Cl.
The (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer should preferably contain crystal grains with a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure. The layer may also contain crystal grains other than the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure, but the presence of crystal grains other than the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure is not intended. Having crystal grains with a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure in the claims and specification means that crystal grains other than this unintended NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure may be present in addition to crystal grains with a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure.
A bottom layer may be disposed between the substrate and the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer, where the bottom layer consists of one or more sublayers each composed of titanium nitride, titanium carbide, or titanium carbonitride (not limited to stoichiometric composition) with a total average thickness of 0.1 to 20.0 μm. The bottom layer improves the adhesion between the substrate and the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer.
A top layer may be disposed on the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer, where the top layer consists of one or more sublayers each composed of titanium nitride, titanium carbide, titanium carbonitride, titanium oxide and/or aluminum oxide (not limited to stoichiometric composition) with a total average thickness of 0.1 to 25.0 μm. The top layer improves chipping and wear resistance.
If the pressure and/or temperature of the gas in the CVD furnace is unstable, a layer different from the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer, bottom layer, and top layer may be deposited unintentionally.
The substrate may be of any known substrate material that does not hinder the achievement of the purpose of the invention. Examples of such a material include WC-based cemented carbides (containing carbides or nitrides of Co, Ti, Zr, Ta, Nb, and Cr, in addition to WC), cermets (mainly composed of TiC, TiN, and TiCN), ceramics (titanium carbide, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, aluminum nitride, and aluminum oxide), and cBN compacts.
The substrate may have any shape suitable for use in a cutting tool, for example, shapes of an insert and a solid tool.
The average thickness, the contents of individual elements, and the average chlorine content of the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer are determined as follows:
The average thickness of the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer can be determined as follows: A sample for observation of the longitudinal section of the coating layer is prepared with a cross-section polisher (CP) or any other instrument, the longitudinal section is observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and then the thickness of the layer is measured at several sites (e.g., at five sites). The thicknesses at several sites are averaged into the average thickness of the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer. The definition of the surface of the substrate will be described below.
The longitudinal section indicates a cross-section perpendicular to a surface (regarded as a flat surface without irregularities) of the substrate in the case of the insert.
The surface of the substrate is defined by the average line (straight line) of the rough interface between the substrate and the coating layer in the observed image of the longitudinal section.
The interface between the (TiVZrNb) (CN) coating layer (or the bottom layer if present) and the substrate is determined from the observed image of the longitudinal section described above. The average line of the roughness curve of the interface is defined as the surface of the substrate. The direction perpendicular to the average line is the direction perpendicular to the substrate (thickness direction of the layer).
In the case that the radius of curvature of the curved surface is sufficiently large relative to the thickness of the coating layer in the substrate having a curved surface, the interface between the coating layer and the substrate in the observation area is regarded as a plane surface; hence, the surface of the substrate can be determined by the same procedure.
The contents of individual elements and chlorine in the (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer are determined as follows:
The Ti content a1, V content a2, Zr content a3, Nb content a4, the C content b1, the N content b2, and chlorine content are the averages of the results of characteristic X-ray analysis observed at ten points by irradiation of the polished surface of the sample of the coating layer with electron beams using an electron probe micro analyzer (EPMA).
The (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer is subjected to X-ray diffractometry to confirm that the layer has a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure. The X-ray diffraction is measured by the 2θ-θ method using CuKα rays, under the following conditions: scanning range (2θ) of 15 to 135 degrees, X-ray output of 45 kV and 40 mA, divergence slit of 0.5 degrees, and scan step of 0.013 degrees.
The (TiVZrNb) (CN) layer can be produced by a CVD process using, for example, TiCl4, ZrCl4, VCl4, NbCl5, HCl, N2, CH3CN, Ar, and H2 gases.
The complex carbonitride of (TiVZrNbHfTa) (sometimes denoted as (TiVZrNbHfTa) (CN)), which constitutes the coating layer of the second embodiment, will now be described.
The crystal structure is the one in which “(TiVZrNbHfTa) (CN)” and “Ti, V, Zr, Nb, Hf, Ta atoms (Hf and Ta are selected depending on the composition)” are substituted for “(TiVZrNb) (CN)” and “Ti, V, Zr, Nb atoms” respectively in the description of the first embodiment for the crystal structure.
The average thickness is the replacement of “(TiVZrNb)” with “(TiVZrNbHfTa)” in the description of the first embodiment regarding average thickness.
The (TiVZrNbHfTa) (CN) layer, which is a complex carbonitride layer, preferably has a composition represented by the chemical formula: (Tia1Va2Zra3Nba4Hfa5Taa6) (Cb1Nb2), where the atomic fractions a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, b1, b2 satisfy the following relations:
and
The layer may contain unintended or inevitable impurities that are introduced during the manufacturing process.
At ai (i=5 or 6) of 0.00 (in the case that Hf or Ta is not contained), ailn(a1) is regarded as 0 (zero).
The atomic fractions a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, b1 and b2 satisfying the relations causes the entropy of mixing of the (TiVZrNbHfTa) (CN) layer to be enhanced, and the (TiVZrNbHfTa) (CN) layer to have the advantageous effects (i)-(ii) found by the inventor.
The atomic fractions a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, b1 and b2 should preferably be determined such that the configuration parameter Sconfig has a larger value. Since the upper limits of atomic fractions a5 and a6 are both less than 0.01, the upper limit for the calculation of the configuration parameter Sconfig is 1.08R.
The Cl content is the replacement of “(TiVZrNb) (CN)” with “(TiVZrNbHfTa) (CN)” in the description of the first embodiment for the Cl content. The Cl content (atomic percent) is defined by the percentage of all atoms of Ti, V, Zr, Nb, Hf, Ta, C, N, and Cl.
(5) NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure
Regarding the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure, “(TiVZrNb)” is replaced with “(TiVZrNbHfTa)” in the description of the first embodiment for NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure above.
Regarding the other layers, “(TiVZrNb)” is replaced with “(TiVZrNbHfTa)” in the description of the first embodiment for the other layers.
The substrate is the same as described in the first embodiment.
Regarding the measurement, “(TiVZrNb)” is replaced with “(TiVZrNbHfTa)” in the description on the measurement of the first embodiment. The contents of Hf and Ta are also measured by EPMA.
The (TiVZrNbHfTa) (CN) layer of this embodiment can be produced by CVD with, for example, deposition gases containing HfCl4 and TaCl5 in addition to TiCl4, ZrCl4, VCl4, NbCl5, HfCl4, TaCl5, HCl, N2, CH3CN, Ar and H2 used in the first embodiment.
The above description supports the following Appendices:
A surface coated cutting tool comprising:
where n=4 and m=2, ln represents the natural logarithm, and R represents the gas constant.
The surface coated cutting tool set forth in Appendix 1, wherein the complex carbonitride layer further contains at least one metallic component selected from the group consisting of Hf and Ta in atomic fractions of as and a6, respectively, wherein
The surface coated cutting tool set forth in Appendix 1 or 2, wherein the complex carbonitride layer further contains 0.50 atomic percent or less of Cl.
The surface coated cutting tool set forth in any of Appendices 1 to 3, further comprising a bottom layer between the substrate and the complex carbonitride layer, the bottom layer including at least one sublayer composed of titanium nitride, titanium carbide, or titanium carbonitride and having a total average thickness of 0.1 to 20.0 μm.
The surface coated cutting tool set forth in any of Appendices 1 to 4, further comprising a top layer on the complex carbonitride layer, the top layer including at least one sublayer composed of titanium nitride, titanium carbide, titanium carbonitride, or titanium oxide layer and having a total average thickness of 0.1 to 25.0 μm.
The present invention will now be described by way of Examples. The present invention should not be limited to Examples. Examples show insert cutting tools including substrates made of WC-based cemented carbide, but the substrate may be composed of any of the aforementioned materials, and the cutting tool may have any other shape, such as a solid tool, as described above.
WC, TiC, ZrC, TaC, NbC, Cr3C2, TiN, and Co raw powders were blended into compositions shown in Table 1, and then were ball-milled together with wax in acetone for 24 hours. After being dried under reduced pressure, each mixture was pressed into a green compact of a predetermined shape under a pressure of 98 MPa.
The green compact was then sintered under vacuum, and then the cutting edges of the sinter were honed to R of 0.05 mm. WC-based cemented carbide substrates A through C, each with an insert shape of CNMG120408-MA manufactured by Mitsubishi Materials Corporation were thereby produced.
(TiVZrNb) (CN) layers were deposited on the surfaces of substrates A to C in a CVD system to yield Examples 1 to 10 shown in Table 5. The conditions for deposition were as shown in Table 2, and were generally as follows:
Composition of reaction gas (content of gas component is in volume %):
In Examples 3 to 10, the bottom layer(s) and/or top layer(s) shown in Table 4 were deposited under the conditions shown in Table 3.
For comparison, (TiVZrNb) (CN) layers were deposited on the surfaces of substrates A to C according to the conditions of deposition shown in Table 2 to yield Comparative Examples 1 to 10 shown in Table 5. For the production of the comparative examples, the composition of the raw material gases was varied from those of Examples. For comparative examples 3 to 10, the bottom layer(s) and/or the top layer(s) shown in Table 4 were deposited according to the conditions shown in Table 3.
To contrast the present invention with the conventional technology, a TiCN layer was deposited on the surface of substrate A and C under the conditions shown in Table 3 and a bottom sublayer shown in Table 4 was deposited to produce Conventional Example 1 shown in Table 5, or a bottom sublayer and top sublayers shown in Table 4 were deposited to produce Conventional Example 2 also shown in Table 5.
The average thickness of each layer, and the content of each element and the chlorine content in each layer were measured, and the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure in each layer was identified for Examples 1 to 10, Comparative Examples 1 to 10, and Conventional Examples 1 to 2, by the methods described above.
The results are summarized in Table 5.
In Table 5, the configuration parameter Sconfig is calculated from the expression —R/2[b1ln(b1)+b2ln(b2)] because Conventional Examples 1-2 do not contain V, Zr, and Nb.
The symbol “**” indicates that the content was below the quantitative limit of the analyzer. In this case, a peak assign to chlorine in the characteristic X-ray spectrum was observed by single-element detection of chlorine only, which results confirm that chlorine was contained in trace amounts.
It was also confirmed that all of Examples, Comparative Examples, and Conventional Examples have crystal grains with a substantially NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure.
While each of Examples 1 to 10, Comparative Examples 1 to 10, and Conventional Examples 1 to 2 was screwed to the tip of a tool steel bite with a fixture, wet end face cutting tests were conducted on a hollow round bar of alloy steel SCM440 with two evenly spaced grooves to measure the flank wear width of the cutting edge.
This cutting test is a process in which flank wear readily progresses and the cutting edge is prone to chipping due to intermittent machining. Since this machining requires both wear resistance and chipping resistance, the test is suitable for the evaluation of hardness and toughness.
Table 6 shows the results of the cutting test. For Comparative Examples 1 to 10 and Conventional Examples 1 to 2, the number of cutting passes to the end of the life is shown because the tool reached the life before the number of cutting operations reached 20 passes due to chipping or flank wear (criterion of life determination: flank wear width 0.4 mm).
As the results shown in Table 6 indicate that Examples 1 through 10 all exhibited low wear, no chipping, improved hardness and toughness, and thus excellent cutting performance over a long period of time.
In contrast, Comparative Examples 1 through 10 and Conventional Examples 1 and 2 each exhibited a large amount of wear or chipping and reached the end of its service life within a short time.
Substrates A to C made of WC-based cemented carbide with the same insert geometry of CNMG120408-MA manufactured by Mitsubishi Materials as in the first embodiment were produced.
(TiVZrNbHfTa) (CN) layers were deposited on the surfaces of substrates A to C in a CVD system to yield Examples 11 to 15 shown in Table 9. The conditions for deposition were as shown in Table 7, and were generally as follows:
Composition of reaction gas (content of gas component is in volume %):
For each of Examples 13 to 15, the bottom layer(s) and/or the top layer(s) shown in Table 8 were deposited under the conditions shown in Table 3.
For comparison, (TiVZrNbHfTa) (CN) layers were deposited on the surfaces of Substrates A to C according to the conditions for deposition shown in Table 7 to yield Comparative Examples 11 to 15 shown in Table 9. In the process of the comparative examples, the composition of the raw material gases was different from those of the examples. For Comparative Examples 13 to 15, the bottom layer(s) and/or the top layer(s) shown in Table 8 were deposited under the conditions shown in Table 3.
The average thickness of each layer, and the content of each element and the chlorine content in each layer were measured, and the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure in each layer was identified for Examples 11 to 15 and Comparative Examples 11 to 15, by the methods described above.
The results are summarized in Table 9.
The symbol “**” in Table 9 indicates that the content was below the quantitative limit of the analyzer. In this case, a peak assign to chlorine in the characteristic X-ray spectrum was observed by single-element detection of chlorine only, which results confirmed that chlorine was contained in trace amounts.
It was also confirmed that all of Examples, Comparative Examples have crystal grains with a substantially NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure.
While each of Examples 11 to 15 and Comparative Examples 11 to 15 was screwed to the tip of a tool steel bite with a fixture, wet end face cutting tests were conducted on a hollow round bar of alloy steel SCM440 with two evenly spaced grooves to measure the flank wear width of the cutting edge.
This cutting test is a process in which flank wear readily progresses and the cutting edge is prone to chipping due to intermittent machining. Since this machining requires both wear resistance and chipping resistance, the test is suitable for the evaluation of hardness and toughness.
Table 10 shows the results of the cutting test. For Comparative Examples 11 to 15, the number of cutting passes to the end of the life is shown because the tool reached the life before the number of cutting operations reached 20 passes due to chipping or flank wear (criterion of life determination: flank wear width 0.4 mm).
As the results shown in Table 10 indicate that Examples 11 through 15 all exhibited low wear, no chipping, and improved both hardness and toughness, demonstrating excellent cutting performance over a long period of time.
In contrast, Comparative Examples 11 to 15 each showed a large amount of wear or chipping and reached the end of its service life in a short time.
The disclosed embodiments are in all respects illustrative only and are not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the claims, not the embodiments, and is intended to include all modifications within the gist and scope of the claims and equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2022-055518 | Mar 2022 | JP | national |
This application is a U.S. National Phase Application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2023/010052 filed on Mar. 15, 2023, which claims the benefit of priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-55518 filed on Mar. 30, 2022, the contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The International Application was published in Japanese on Oct. 5, 2023 as International Publication No. WO2023/189595 under PCT Article 21(2).
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2023/010052 | 3/15/2023 | WO |