Surface controlled reversible coiled tubing valve assembly

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10697252
  • Patent Number
    10,697,252
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 17, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 30, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A valve assembly for reversibly governing fluid flow through coiled tubing equipment. Valves of the assembly may be directed by a telemetric line running from an oilfield surface. In this manner, valve adjustment and/or reversibility need not require removal of the assembly from the well in order to attain manual accessibility. Similarly, operation of the valves is not reliant on any particular flow rate or other application limiting means. As such, multiple fluid treatments at a variety of different downhole locations may take place with a reduced number of trips into the well and without compromise to flow rate parameters of the treatments.
Description
FIELD

Embodiments described relate to tools and techniques for delivering treatment fluids to downhole well locations. In particular, embodiments of tools and techniques are described for delivering treatment fluids to downhole locations of low pressure bottom hole wells. The tools and techniques are directed at achieving a degree of precision with respect to treatment fluid delivery to such downhole locations.


BACKGROUND

Exploring, drilling and completing hydrocarbon and other wells are generally complicated, time consuming, and ultimately very expensive endeavors. As a result, over the years, a tremendous amount of added emphasis has been placed on monitoring and maintaining wells throughout their productive lives. Well monitoring and maintenance may be directed at maximizing production as well as extending well life. In the case of well monitoring, logging and other applications may be utilized which provide temperature, pressure and other production related information. In the case of well maintenance, a host of interventional applications may come into play. For example, perforations may be induced in the wall of the well, regions of the well closed off, debris or tools and equipment removed that have become stuck downhole, etc. Additionally, in some cases, locations in the well may be enhanced, repaired or otherwise treated by the introduction of downhole treatment fluids such as those containing acid jetting constituents, flowback control fibers and others.


With respect to the delivery of downhole treatment fluid, several thousand feet of coiled tubing may be advanced through the well until a treatment location is reached. In many cases a variety of treatment locations may be present in the well, for example, where the well is of multilateral architecture. Regardless, the advancement of the coiled tubing to any of the treatment locations is achieved by appropriate positioning of a coiled tubing reel near the well, for example with a coiled tubing truck and delivery equipment. The coiled tubing may then be driven to the treatment location.


Once positioned for treatment, a valve assembly at the end of the coiled tubing may be opened and the appropriate treatment fluid delivered. For example, the coiled tubing may be employed to locate and advance to within a given lateral leg of the well for treatment therein. As such, a ball, dart, or other projectile may be dropped within the coiled tubing for ballistic actuation and opening of the valve at the end of the coiled tubing. Thus, the treatment fluid may be delivered to the desired location as indicated. So, by way of example, an acid jetting clean-out application may take place within the targeted location of the lateral leg.


Unfortunately, once a treatment application through a valve assembly is actuated as noted above, the entire coiled tubing has to be removed from the well to perform a subsequent treatment through the assembly. That is, as a practical matter, in order to re-close the valve until the next treatment location is reached for a subsequent application, the valve should be manually accessible. In other words, such treatments are generally ‘single-shot’ in nature. For example, once a ball is dropped to force open a sleeve or other port actuating feature, the port will remain open until the ball is manually removed and the sleeve re-closed.


As a result of having to manually access the valve assembly between downhole coiled tubing treatments, a tremendous amount of delay and expense are added to operations wherever multiple coiled tubing treatments are sought. This may be particularly the case where treatments within multilaterals are sought. For example, an acid jetting treatment directed at 3-4 different legs of a multilateral well may involve 6-8 different trips into and out of the well in order to service each leg. That is, a trip in, a valve actuation and clean-out, and a trip out for manual resetting of the valve for each treatment. Given the depths involved, this may add days of delay and tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost time before complete acid treatment and clean-out to each leg is achieved.


A variety of efforts have been undertaken to address the costly well trip redundancy involved in coiled tubing fluid treatments as noted above. For example, balls or other projectiles utilized for valve actuation may be constructed of degradable materials. Thus, in theory, the ball may serve to temporarily provide valve actuation, thereby obviating the need to remove the coiled tubing in order to reset or re-close the valve. Unfortunately, this involves reliance on a largely unpredictable and uncontrollable rate of degradation. As such, tight controls over the delivery of the treatment fluids or precisely when the coiled tubing might be moved to the next treatment location are foregone.


As an alternative to ball-drop type of actuations, a valve assembly may be utilized which is actuated at given pre-determined flow rates. So, for example, when more than 1 barrel per minute (BPM) is driven through the coiled tubing, the valve may be opened. Of course, this narrows the range of flow rate which may be utilized for the given treatment application and reduces the number of flow rates left available for other applications. In a more specific example, this limits the range of flow available for acid jetting at the treatment location and also reduces flow options available for utilizing flow driven coiled tubing tools, as may be the case for milling, mud motors, or locating tools. Thus, as a practical matter, operators are generally left with the more viable but costly manual retrieval between each treatment.


SUMMARY

A reversible valve assembly is disclosed for coiled tubing deployment into a well from an oilfield surface. The assembly includes a valve disposed within a channel of the assembly for reversibly regulating flow therethrough. A communication mechanism, such as a fiber optic line may be included for governing the regulating of the flow. The valve itself may be of a sleeve, ball and/or adjustable orifice configuration. Further, the valve may be the first of multiple valves governing different passages. Once more, in one embodiment first and second valves may be configured to alternatingly open their respective passages based on input from the communication mechanism.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a front view of downhole coiled tubing equipment employing an embodiment of a surface controlled reversible coiled tubing valve assembly.



FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of the reversible coiled tubing valve assembly taken from 2-2 of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is an overview depiction of an oilfield with a multilateral well accommodating the coiled tubing equipment and valve assembly of FIGS. 1 and 2.



FIG. 4A is an enlarged view of a locator extension of the coiled tubing equipment signaling access of a leg of the multilateral well of FIG. 3.



FIG. 4B is an enlarged view of a jetting tool of the coiled tubing equipment reaching a target location in the leg of FIG. 4A for cleanout.



FIG. 4C is an enlarged sectional view of the valve assembly of the coiled tubing equipment adjusted for a fiber delivery application following the cleanout application of FIG. 4B.



FIG. 5 is a flow-chart summarizing an embodiment of employing a surface controlled reversible coiled tubing valve assembly in a well.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments are described with reference to certain downhole applications. For example, in the embodiments depicted herein, downhole cleanout and fiber delivery applications are depicted in detail via coiled tubing delivery. However, a variety of other application types may employ embodiments of a reversible coiled tubing valve assembly for a variety of different types of treatment fluids as described herein. Regardless, the valve assembly embodiments include the unique capacity to regulate fluid pressure and/or delivery for a given downhole application while also being adjustable or reversible for a subsequent application without the need for surface retrieval and manipulation.


Referring now to FIG. 1, with added reference to FIG. 3, a front view of downhole coiled tubing equipment 101 is depicted. The equipment 101 includes a reversible valve assembly 100 which, in conjunction with other downhole tools, may be deployed by coiled tubing 110 at an oilfield 301. Indeed, the assembly 100 and other tools of the equipment 101 may communicate with, or be controlled by, equipment located at the oilfield 301 as detailed further below. The valve assembly 100 in particular may be utilized in a reversible and/or adjustable manner. That is, it may be fully or partially opened or closed via telemetric communication with surface equipment.


A ‘universal’ valve assembly 100, so to speak, with reversibility, may be employed to reduce trips into and out of a well 380 for fluid based treatments as indicated above. This capacity also lends to easier reverse circulation, that is, flowing fluids into and out of the well 380. Further, this capacity also allows for utilizing the valve assembly 100 as a backpressure or check valve as needed. Once more, given that the valve assembly 100 operates independent of fluid flow, flow rates through the equipment 101 may be driven as high or as low as needed without being limited by the presence of the assembly 100.


Telemetry for such communications and/or control as noted above may be supplied through fiber optic components as detailed in either of application Ser. Nos. 12/575,024 or 11/135,314, both entitled System and Methods Using Fiber Optics in Coiled Tubing and incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. However, other forms of low profile coiled tubing compatible telemetry may also be employed. For example, encapsulated electrically conductive line of less than about 0.2 inches in outer diameter may be utilized to provide communications between the valve assembly 100 and surface equipment.


Regardless, the particular mode of telemetry, the power supply for valve assembly 100 maneuvers may be provided through a dedicated downhole source, which addresses any concerns over the inability to transport adequate power over a low profile electrically conductive line and/or fiber optic components. More specifically, in the embodiment shown, an electronics and power housing 120 is shown coupled to the coiled tubing 110. This housing 120 may accommodate a lithium ion battery or other suitable power source for the valve assembly 100 and any other lower power downhole tools. Electronics for certain downhole computations may also be found in the housing 120, along with any communicative interfacing between telemetry and downhole tools, as detailed further below.


The coiled tubing 110 of FIG. 1 is likely to be no more than about 2 inches in outer diameter. Yet, at the same time, hard wired telemetry may be disposed therethrough as indicated above. Thus, the fiber optic or low profile electrically conductive line options for telemetry are many. By the same token, the limited inner diameter of the coiled tubing 110 also places physical limitations on fluid flow options therethrough. That is to say, employing flow rate to actuate downhole tools as detailed further below will be limited, as a practical matter, to flow rates of between about ½ to 2 BPM. Therefore, utilizing structural low profile telemetry for communications with the valve assembly 100, as opposed to flow control techniques, frees up the limited range of available flow rates for use in operating other tools as detailed further below.


Continuing with reference to FIG. 1, the coiled tubing equipment 101 may be outfitted with a locator extension 140, arm 150 and regulator 130 for use in directing the equipment 101 to a lateral leg 391 of a well 380 as detailed below. As alluded to above, these tools 140, 150, 130 may be operate via flow control. More specifically, these tools 140, 150, 130 may cooperatively operate together as a pressure pulse locating/communication tool. Similarly, the equipment 101 is also outfitted with a flow operated jetting tool 160 for use in a cleanout application as also detailed below.


Referring now to FIG. 2, an enlarged cross-sectional view of the valve assembly 100 taken from 2-2 of FIG. 1 is depicted. The assembly 100 includes a central channel 200. The channel 200 is defined in part by sleeve 225 and ball 250 valves. In the embodiment shown, these valves 225, 250 are oriented to allow and guide fluid flow through the assembly 100. More specifically, for the depicted embodiment, any fluid entering the channel 200 from a tool uphole of the assembly 100 (e.g. the noted regulator 130) is directly passed through to the tool downhole of the assembly 100 (e.g. the noted locator extension 140). With added reference to FIG. 3, a clean flow of fluid through the assembly 100 in this manner may take place as a matter of providing hydraulic support to the coiled tubing 110 as it is advanced through a well 380 in advance of any interventional applications.


However, depending an the application stage undertaken via the assembly, these valves 225, 250 may be in different positions. For example, as depicted in FIG. 4C, the sleeve valve 225 may be shifted open to expose side ports 210 for radial circulation. Similarly, the ball valve 250 may be oriented to a closed position, perhaps further encouraging such circulation, as also shown in FIG. 4C.


Continuing with reference to FIG. 2, with added reference to FIG. 3, the particular positioning of the valves 225, 250 may be determined by a conventional powered communication line 275. That is, with added reference to FIG. 1, the line 275 may run from the electronics and power housing 120. Thus, adequate power for actuating or manipulating the valve 225 or 250 through a solenoid, pump, motor, a piezo-electric stack, a magnetostrictive material, a shape memory material, or other suitable actuating element may be provided.


At the housing 120, the line 275 may also be provided with interfaced coupling to the above noted telemetry (of a fiber optic or low profile electrical line). Indeed, in this manner, real-time valve manipulations or adjustment may be directed from an oilfield surface 301, such as by a control unit 315. As a result, the entire coiled tubing equipment 101 may be left downhole during and between different fluid flow applications without the need for assembly 100 removal in order to manipulate or adjust valve positions.


In one embodiment, the assembly 100 may be equipped to provide valve operational feedback to surface over the noted telemetry. For example, the assembly 100 may be outfitted with a solenoid such as that noted above, which is also linked to the communication line 275 to provide pressure monitoring capacity, thereby indicative of valve function.


It is worth noting that each valve 225, 250 may be independently operated. So, for example, in contrast to FIG. 2 (or FIG. 4C) both valves 225, 250 may also be opened or closed at the same time. Further, a host of additional and/or different types of valves may be incorporated into the assembly 100. In one embodiment, for example, the ball valve 250 may be modified with a side outlet emerging from its central passage 201 and located at the position of the sleeve valve 225 of FIG. 2. Thus, the outlet may be aligned with one of the side ports 210 to allow simultaneous flow therethrough in addition to the central channel 200. Of course, with such a configuration, orientation of the central passage 201 with each port 210, and the outlet with the channel 200, may be utilized to restrict flow to the ports 210 alone.


With specific reference to FIG. 3, an overview of the noted oilfield 301 is depicted. In this view, the oilfield 301 is shown accommodating a multilateral well 380 which traverses various formation layers 390, 395. A different lateral leg 391, 396, each with its own production region 392, 397 is shown running through each layer 390, 395. These regions 392, 397 may include debris 375 for cleanout with a jetting tool 160 or otherwise necessitate fluid based intervention by the coiled tubing equipment 201. Nevertheless, due to the configuration of the valve assembly 100, such applications may take place sequentially as detailed herein without the requirement of removing the equipment 201 between applications.


Continuing with reference to FIG. 3, the coiled tubing equipment 101 may be deployed with the aid of a host of surface equipment 300 disposed at the oilfield 301. As shown, the coiled tubing 110 itself may be unwound from a reel 325 and forcibly advanced into the well 380 through a conventional gooseneck injector 345. The reel 325 itself may be positioned at the oilfield 301 atop a conventional skid 305 or perhaps by more mobile means such as a coiled tubing truck. Additionally, a control unit 315 may be provided to direct coiled tubing operations ranging from the noted deployment to valve assembly 100 adjustments and other downhole application maneuvers.


In the embodiment shown, the surface equipment 300 also includes a valve and pressure regulating assembly, often referred to as a ‘Christmas Tree’ 355, through which the coiled tubing 110 may controllably be run. A rig 335 for supportably aligning the injector 345 over the Christmas Tree 355 and well head 365 is also provided. Indeed, the rig 335 may accommodate a host of other tools depending on the nature of operations.


Referring now to FIGS. 4A-4C, enlarged views of the coiled tubing equipment 101 as it reaches and performs treatments in a lateral leg 391 are shown. More specifically, FIG. 4A depicts a locator extension 140 and arm 150 acquiring access to the leg 391. Subsequently, FIGS. 4B and 4C respectively reveal fluid cleanout and fiber delivery applications at the production region 392 of the lateral leg 391.


With specific reference to FIG. 4A, the locator extension 140 and arm 150 may be employed to gain access to the lateral leg 391 and to signal that such access has been obtained. For example, in an embodiment similar to those detailed in application Ser. No. 12/135,682, Backpressure Valve for Wireless Communication (Xu et al.), the extension 140 and arm 150 may be drawn toward one another about a joint at an angle θ. In advance of reaching the leg 391, the size of this angle θ may be maintained at a minimum as determined by the diameter of the main bore of the well 380. However, once the jetting tool 160 and arm 150 gain access to the lateral leg 391, a reduction in the size of the angle θ may be allowed. As such, a conventional pressure pulse signal 400 may be generated for transmission through a regulator 130 and to surface as detailed in the '682 Application and elsewhere.


With knowledge of gained access to the lateral leg 391 provided to the operator, subsequent applications may be undertaken therein as detailed below. Additionally, it is worth noting that fluid flow through the coiled tubing 110, the regulator 130, the extension 140 and the arm 150 is unimpeded by the intervening presence of the valve assembly 100. That is, to the extent that such flow is needed to avoid collapse of the coiled tubing 110, to allow for adequate propagation of the pressure pulse signal 400, or for any other reason, the assembly 100 may be rendered inconsequential. As detailed above, this is due to the fact that any valves 225, 250 of the assembly 100 are operable independent of the flow through the equipment 101.


Continuing now with reference to FIG. 4B, an enlarged view of the noted jetting tool 160 of the coiled tubing equipment 101 is shown. More specifically, this tool 160 is depicted reaching a target location at the production region 392 of the leg 391 for cleanout. Indeed, as shown, debris 375 such as sand, scale or other buildup is depicted obstructing recovery from perforations 393 of the region 392.


With added reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, the ball valve 250 of the assembly 100 may be in an open position for a jetting application directed at the debris 375. More specifically, 1-2 BPM of an acid based cleanout fluid may be pumped through the coiled tubing 110 and central channel 200 to achieve cleanout via the jetting tool 160. Again, however, the ball valve 250 being in the open position for the cleanout application is achieved and/or maintained in a manner independent of the fluid flow employed for the cleanout. Rather, low profile telemetry, fiber optic or otherwise, renders operational control of the valve assembly 100 and the valve 250 of negligible consequence or impact on the fluid flow.


Referring now to FIG. 4C, with added reference to FIG. 2, an enlarged sectional view of the valve assembly 100 is shown. By way of contrast to the assembly 100 of FIG. 2, however, the valves 225, 250 are now adjusted for radial delivery of a fiber 450 following cleanout through the jetting tool 160 of FIG. 4B. Delivery of the fibers 450 through the comparatively larger radial ports 210 in this manner may help avoid clogging elsewhere (e.g., at the jetting tool 160). The fibers 450 themselves may be of glass, ceramic, metal or other conventional flowback discouraging material for disposal at the production region 392 to help promote later hydrocarbon recovery.


Regardless, in order to switch from the cleanout application of FIG. 4B to the fiber delivery of FIG. 4C, the acid flow may be terminated and the ball valve 250 rotated to close off the channel 200. As noted above, this is achieved without the need to remove the assembly 100 for manual manipulation at the oilfield surface 301 (see FIG. 3). A streamlined opening of the sleeve valve 225 to expose radial ports 210 may thus take place in conjunction with providing a fluid flow of a fiber mixture for the radial delivery of the fiber 450 as depicted. Once more, while the fluid flow is affected by the change in orientation of the valves 225, 250, the actual manner of changing of the orientation itself is of no particular consequence to the flow. That is, due to the telemetry provided, no particular flow modifications are needed in order to achieve the noted changes in valve orientation.


Referring now to FIG. 5, a flow-chart is depicted which summarizes an embodiment of employing a surface controlled reversible coiled tubing valve assembly in a well. Namely, coiled tubing equipment may be deployed into a well and located at a treatment location for performing a treatment application (see 515, 530, 545). Of particular note, as indicated at 560, a valve assembly of the equipment may be adjusted at any point along the way with the equipment remaining in the well. Once more, the equipment may (or may not) be moved to yet another treatment location as indicated at 575 before another fluid treatment application is performed as noted at 590. That is, this subsequent treatment follows adjustment of the valve assembly with the equipment in the well, irrespective of any intervening repositioning of the equipment.


Embodiments described hereinabove include assemblies and techniques that avoid the need for removal of coiled tubing equipment from a well in order to adjust treatment valve settings. Further, valves of the equipment may be employed or adjusted downhole without reliance on the use of any particular flow rates through the coiled tubing. As a result, trips in the well, as well as overall operation expenses may be substantially reduced where various fluid treatment applications are involved.


The preceding description has been presented with reference to the disclosed embodiments. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which these embodiments pertain will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of these embodiments. For example, embodiments depicted herein focus on particular cleanout applications and fiber delivery. However, embodiments of tools and techniques as detailed herein may be employed for alternative applications such as cement placement. Additionally, alternative types of circulation may be employed or additional tools such as isolation packers, multicycle circulation valves. Regardless, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: locating coiled tubing equipment at a first treatment location in a well;performing a downhole application via fluid flow through a valve assembly of the coiled tubing equipment at the first treatment location in the well, wherein the valve assembly comprises a sleeve valve radially disposed within a channel of the valve assembly for adjustably regulating the fluid flow through a radial port of the valve assembly;moving the coiled tubing equipment to a second treatment location in the well;after moving the coiled tubing equipment to the second treatment location in the well, adjusting the valve assembly with the coiled tubing equipment in the well to affect the fluid flow to perform at least another downhole application, wherein the adjusting comprises sending communication over a telemetric line to the valve assembly from surface equipment disposed at an oilfield accommodating the well; andpowering the valve assembly via an electronics and power housing coupled to the valve assembly and the coiled tubing equipment.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the applications is selected from a group consisting of a cleanout application, a fiber delivery application, a multilateral leg locating application, and cement placement.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, comprising governing the regulating of the fluid flow through the radial port of the valve assembly using the telemetric line.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the telemetric line is of a fiber optic configuration.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, comprising: governing a first passage using a first sleeve valve; andgoverning a second passage using a second sleeve valve;wherein the first and second passages are configured to be independently opened as directed by communications over the telemetric line.
  • 6. The method of claim 3, comprising regulating the fluid flow using an actuating element coupled to the sleeve valve, wherein the actuating element is coupled to the telemetric line via the electronics and power housing.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the actuating element comprises one of a downhole pump, a downhole motor, a piezo-electric stack, a magnetostrictive material, a shape memory material, and a solenoid.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, comprising performing one of a check valve function and a backpressure valve function using the valve assembly.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronics and power housing comprises a battery for powering the valve assembly.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the fluid flow is employed by a hydraulic tool coupled to the valve assembly.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the hydraulic tool comprises one of a cleanout tool and a locating tool.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the locating tool comprises a pressure pulse communication tool.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the cleanout tool comprises a jetting tool.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the fluid flow comprises an acid fluid flow.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

The present application is a continuation-in-part claiming priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/575,024, entitled System and Methods Using Fiber Optics in Coiled Tubing, filed Oct. 7, 2009, and which is a Continuation of Ser. No. 11/135,314 of the same title, filed on May 23, 2005, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties along with the Provisional Parent of the same title under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e), App. Ser. No. 60/575,327, filed on May 28, 2004.

US Referenced Citations (169)
Number Name Date Kind
2558427 Fagan Jun 1951 A
2651027 Vogel Sep 1953 A
3348616 Zingg Oct 1967 A
4619323 Gidley Oct 1986 A
4856584 Seidner Aug 1989 A
4859054 Harrison Aug 1989 A
4904865 Meisner et al. Feb 1990 A
4926940 Stromswold May 1990 A
5042903 Jakubowski Aug 1991 A
5140319 Riordan Aug 1992 A
5284207 Bittleston et al. Feb 1994 A
5320181 Lantier, Sr. et al. Jun 1994 A
5332048 Underwood et al. Jul 1994 A
5419395 Harvey et al. May 1995 A
5434395 Storck et al. Jul 1995 A
5485745 Rademaker et al. Jan 1996 A
5542471 Dickinson Aug 1996 A
5573225 Boyle et al. Nov 1996 A
5597042 Tubel et al. Jan 1997 A
5810080 Meynier Sep 1998 A
5898517 Weis Apr 1999 A
5944123 Johnson Aug 1999 A
5965826 Von Bertrab Oct 1999 A
5992250 Kluth et al. Nov 1999 A
5996689 Head Dec 1999 A
6009216 Pruett et al. Dec 1999 A
6062311 Johnson et al. May 2000 A
6079281 Oszajca et al. Jun 2000 A
6082461 Newman et al. Jul 2000 A
6089323 Newman et al. Jul 2000 A
6112809 Angle Sep 2000 A
6157893 Berger et al. Dec 2000 A
6173771 Eslinger et al. Jan 2001 B1
6173795 McGarian et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192983 Neuroth et al. Feb 2001 B1
6229453 Gardner et al. May 2001 B1
6241031 Beaufort et al. Jun 2001 B1
6247536 Leismer et al. Jun 2001 B1
6268911 Tubel et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273189 Gissler et al. Aug 2001 B1
6276454 Fontana et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281489 Tubel et al. Aug 2001 B1
6321845 Deaton Nov 2001 B1
6323420 Head Nov 2001 B1
6347674 Bloom et al. Feb 2002 B1
6349768 Leising Feb 2002 B1
6367366 Bloom et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392151 Rafie et al. May 2002 B1
6397864 Johnson Jun 2002 B1
6419014 Meek et al. Jul 2002 B1
6427786 Beaufort et al. Aug 2002 B2
6464003 Bloom et al. Oct 2002 B2
6467557 Krueger et al. Oct 2002 B1
6474152 Mullins et al. Nov 2002 B1
6478097 Bloom et al. Nov 2002 B2
6497290 Misselbrook et al. Dec 2002 B1
6519568 Harvey et al. Feb 2003 B1
6531694 Tubel et al. Mar 2003 B2
6534449 Gilmour et al. Mar 2003 B1
6581455 Berger et al. Jun 2003 B1
6629568 Post et al. Oct 2003 B2
6640894 Bloom et al. Nov 2003 B2
6644402 Sharma et al. Nov 2003 B1
6655461 Eslinger et al. Dec 2003 B2
6667280 Chang et al. Dec 2003 B2
6679341 Bloom et al. Jan 2004 B2
6691587 King Feb 2004 B1
6715559 Bloom et al. Apr 2004 B2
6745854 Bloom et al. Jun 2004 B2
6789621 Wetzel et al. Sep 2004 B2
6817410 Wetzel et al. Nov 2004 B2
6834722 Vacik et al. Dec 2004 B2
6868906 Vail, III et al. Mar 2005 B1
6889771 Leising et al. May 2005 B1
6935423 Kusmer Aug 2005 B2
6938708 Bloom et al. Sep 2005 B2
7048047 Bloom et al. May 2006 B2
7055604 Jee et al. Jun 2006 B2
7073582 Connell et al. Jul 2006 B2
7077200 Adnan et al. Jul 2006 B1
7080700 Bloom et al. Jul 2006 B2
7080701 Bloom et al. Jul 2006 B2
7121364 Mock et al. Oct 2006 B2
7124819 Ciglenec et al. Oct 2006 B2
7140435 Defretin et al. Nov 2006 B2
7140437 McMechan et al. Nov 2006 B2
7152685 Adnan et al. Dec 2006 B2
7174974 Bloom et al. Feb 2007 B2
7182134 Wetzel et al. Feb 2007 B2
7207216 Meister et al. Apr 2007 B2
7308941 Rolovic et al. Dec 2007 B2
7311153 McKee et al. Dec 2007 B2
7420475 Adnan et al. Sep 2008 B2
7515774 Vannuffelen et al. Apr 2009 B2
7565834 Adnan et al. Jul 2009 B2
7597142 Hartog et al. Oct 2009 B2
7614452 Kenison et al. Nov 2009 B2
7617873 Lovell et al. Nov 2009 B2
7654318 Cooper et al. Feb 2010 B2
7757755 Kenison et al. Jul 2010 B2
7793732 Xu et al. Sep 2010 B2
7827859 Pipchuk et al. Nov 2010 B2
7841412 Jasser et al. Nov 2010 B2
7929812 Vannuffelen et al. Apr 2011 B2
8230915 Weng Jul 2012 B2
8733438 Kenison et al. May 2014 B2
8770303 Aguirre et al. Jul 2014 B2
8844653 deBoer Sep 2014 B2
10385680 Livescu et al. Aug 2019 B2
20010050172 Tolman et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020007945 Neuroth et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007948 Bayne et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007971 Beaufort et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020017386 Ringgenberg et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029908 Bloom et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020104686 Bloom et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020125008 Wetzel et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030075361 Terry et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030116356 Bloom et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030121703 Bloom et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030155156 Livingstone Aug 2003 A1
20030188875 Bloom et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040020653 Smith Feb 2004 A1
20040040707 Dusterhoft et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040045705 Gardner et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040067002 Berg et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040084190 Hill et al. May 2004 A1
20040104052 Livingstone Jun 2004 A1
20040129418 Jee et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040245018 Bloom et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050016730 McMechan et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050072577 Freeman Apr 2005 A1
20050082055 Bloom et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050126777 Rolovic et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050145415 Doering et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050236161 Gay et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050247488 Mock et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050252686 Bloom et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050263281 Lovell et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060044156 Adnan et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060102347 Smith May 2006 A1
20060152383 Yamate et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060157239 Ramos et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060196694 Bloom et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060196696 Bloom et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070126594 Atkinson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070137860 Lovell et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070215345 Lafferty et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070227741 Lovell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080041594 Boles et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080053658 Wesson et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080066962 Rolovic et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080066963 Sheiretov et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080073077 Tunc et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080134774 Oddie Jun 2008 A1
20080142212 Hartog et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080210427 Ziauddin et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080236836 Weng Oct 2008 A1
20080308272 Thomeer et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090025923 Patel et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090084536 Kenison et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090151936 Greenaway Jun 2009 A1
20090301713 Xu et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100018703 Lovell et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100051289 Constantine et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100084132 Noya Apr 2010 A1
20110155379 Bailey et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110308860 deBoer Dec 2011 A1
20170152738 Berzanskis et al. Jun 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (25)
Number Date Country
2818656 Oct 1979 DE
29816469 Dec 1998 DE
0203249 Dec 1986 EP
0853249 Jul 1998 EP
0911483 Aug 2006 EP
2177231 Jan 1987 GB
2275953 Sep 1994 GB
2299868 Oct 1996 GB
2346908 Aug 2000 GB
2362405 Nov 2001 GB
2378468 Feb 2003 GB
2378469 Feb 2003 GB
2413816 Nov 2005 GB
2434819 Aug 2007 GB
1236098 Jun 1986 SU
9521987 Aug 1995 WO
9708418 Mar 1997 WO
0036266 Jun 2000 WO
0046481 Aug 2000 WO
0109478 Feb 2001 WO
0244509 Jun 2002 WO
2004072433 Aug 2004 WO
2005116388 Dec 2005 WO
2008024859 Feb 2008 WO
2008081404 Jul 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
Wolfbeis et al., “Fiber Optic Fluorosensor for Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide”, Anal. Chem., 1998, vol. 60, pp. 2028-2030.
Maher et al., “A Fiber Optic Chemical Sensor for Measurement of Groundwarter pH”, The American Society for Testing and Materials, Sep. 1993, pp. 448-452, vol. 21, No. 5.
Esteban et al., “Measurement of the Degree of Salinity of Water With a Fiber-Optic Sensor”, Sep. 1999, Applied Optics, vol. 38, Issue 25, pp. 5267-5271.
International Search Report issued in International Patent Appl. No. PCT/IB2005/051734 dated Aug. 5, 2005; 3 pages.
Written Opinion issued in International Patent Appl. No. PCT/IB2005/051734 dated Aug. 5, 2005; 5 pages.
Eslinger et al., “A Hybrid Milling/Jetting Tool—The Safe Solution to Scale Milling”, SPE 60700, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc., Houston, Texas, Apr. 5-6, 2000, 6 pages.
Johnson et al., “An Abrasive Jetting Scale Removal System”, SPE 46026, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc., Houston, Texas, Apr. 15-16, 1996, 6 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190017333 A1 Jan 2019 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13645963 Oct 2012 US
Child 16133371 US