Patent Grant
12036438
N/A
The present invention is generally directed to an exercise bench, and more particularly, to an apparatus comprising cushions strategically placed for providing support to relevant parts of the human body. The present invention is relevant to the evolution of gym furniture and the ergonomic considerations of the human posture. This disclosure shows how undulated surfaces are more suitable for the human skeletal system and the preferred design for reducing the risk of injuries in gym furniture and equipment.
There are some traditional customer profiles in gymnasiums: first there's the low self-motivated person interested in some degree of transformation (weight loss, muscular shape, flexibility, etc.) within the next eight months. The second group are the short-term goals achievers. They have a specific event or goal to accomplish within the next months, for which an intense routine, diet, and constant training are required. The third group are made up of the traditional athletes, or “gym rats”, who have an athletic background or some sense of exercising structure. However, despite their chromatic high energy and adrenaline, a closer look shows that there are some problems. Most of them use an incorrect posture or alignment. The human body contains axis lines that divide the unit of the body in planes.
Lowering the shoulders, flattening the lower back, or to relaxing the neck are examples of reminders that trainers need to give people at gyms. There's a degree of disconnection between themselves and the mechanics of those movements in relation to possible injuries. The science of working out and the implications of an incorrect posture on the human anatomy are presumed knowledge that one has while exercising, but that is not always the case. In fact, the only existing solution to mitigate this dilemma is personal trainer services, and isolated efforts for cushioning certain parts of the body. However, these interventions are insufficient and not accessible to everyone.
The Cambridge Dictionary defines the term flat as “the quality of being level and without curves, high, or hollow parts”. For instance, the gym bench is flat, the seats of the machines are flat, the back vests are flat, the bike pedals are flat. However, while we know that in other fields there is an appreciation of form, why can we not find a greater appreciation for form in gym furniture? Is flatness a given in the gym furniture industry? How is it that we can acknowledge an issue, but just ignore it?
It is true that the gym equipment reflects the manufacturing techniques from the time during which it was built, but they also embody the culture in which they were immersed and the priorities that shaped social contexts. Is the flatness of a gym bench evidence for a lack of attention as to the destined user anatomy? John Morley, in his book History of Furniture: Twenty-five centuries of style and design in the western tradition demonstrates how early Roman furniture was more concerned about aesthetics and embellishments than the functionality of the design. For Roland Barthes—due to cultural hegemony, collective usage, and structural association with a table—a gym bench is for sitting or lying down. The message in the usage is the significant. What is it for? Does the bench signify or welcome an object (or user) to sit or lay on it? Because the bench is designed to be used for fitness purposes and scenarios, it induces a signifier who will read what actions or meaning can be derived from it. And so, the surface of a bench should receive the surface of the user's back, in an empathetic dialectic where furniture and anatomy perfectly merge.
Our bones are interconnected different directions or orientations. There are six different sets of anatomical terms for direction in the human body: anterior or posterior; superior or inferior; medial or lateral; mesial or distal; buccal, labial, or lingual; and proximal or distal. Other relevant anatomical planes and directions are the anterior and posterior directions, which refer to the front and back of the body, or parallel to the front and back of the body. Such planes lie perpendicular to the axis of symmetry, which divides the body into right and left halves. The terms superior and inferior refer to the relative placement of structures along a vertical axis. And finally, proximal and distal refer to the relationship between the bones or other structures of the limbs.
Proper body mechanics paired with an understanding of the body posture can contribute to a healthier and more effective exercise experience.
A surface empathy between two objects can be found when the objects share a common surface design, generating some stable relation as a unit. An example of this is the relationship between the flat surface of a table and the flat bottom end part of a cup. Once these two flat surfaces meet, they establish a cohesive, effortless relationship in which both entities can rest on the other without no other tension involved.
On the other hand, surface discrepancy can be found when two surfaces from two or more different objects do not match in the shape. Once surface discrepancy happens, we can find empty/blank spaces in between the surfaces, in which assembly is not properly sealed. This discrepancy between surfaces generally generates some sort of tension, and any other external or internal force can easily break the point of encounter. A common example is a sphere (or any ball) on the ground. Since the ball has no flat face, or surface, it will not totally bond with the floor, which means that any internal or external force (like gravity or wind) can easily affect the point of encounter. This relationship, due the lack of stability, promotes tension and inaccuracy.
When we lift free-weights on a flat surface without ‘proper’ support, due to the load of weight involved while exercising and a poor core awareness, the body arches and contracts in ways and directions that can injure, especially the neck and back. The neck is susceptible to injury because it is capable of extensive range of motion. It is, as a result, less stable that many other body areas. In addition, the neck muscles are affected by the motion of nearly all other areas of the body.
The term “affordance discrepancy” states a lack of correlation between the physicality of a design (shape, size, contour, material selection) with the part of the body with which it is destined to interact.
Some solutions to the problem of flat exercise equipment exist in the prior art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,153,249 discloses an exercise bench with a contour frame. In this application, the conflict between the two forces on a straight line was approached by adding another point(s) of tension between the two main ones. The result, is a “broken line,” which is not a curve, like the human spine. A curve, as opposed to a broken line, is produced by the effect of two forces acting simultaneously. Further more, this design provides no neck cushioning.
U.S. Patent Application No. 20190262659A1 discloses a foam cushion to be added to traditional exercise benches. However, it is limited to an isolated item exclusively for the upper body. The cushioning points between the neck and the lower back are on a flat surface instead of being harmoniously integrated on one continuous curvature.
International Patent Application WO2012138336A1 discloses an exercise bench with a tillable bladder. This invention, however, is limited to one single unit and surface and does not provide length adjustment, angle articulation or a touch point with the knees (in relation with the tail bone). The surface is made one single compilation of rods that respond to the external pressure rather than an undulated cushioning units.
These examples of prior art do tackle some of the principles for cushioning during exercising on a bench-press, however none of them showcase the synthesis of the main cushioning points (neck, lower back, bone tail, and knee) combined into one single unit that also articulates (angle) and adjust to different sizes. Also, none of the surfaces from the case studies above demonstrate an undulated cushioning surface to promote an empathetic relationship between the user and the machine, for upper and lower body separately, integrated into one continuous undulated surface. Finally, none of the cited references above uses color, on the surface, for instructing the user about the right body placement on the machine, through the principle of body mapping.
Therefore, there is a need in the art for an exercise bench that features a continuous undulated surface for cushioning the different curvatures of the neck, lower-back, and legs, including a colored surface as an indicator to the user for the right placement through the use of body mapping, and angle and height adjustment.
The present invention is generally related to an exercise bench comprising two cushioned and adjustable platforms that allow for surface empathy between the bench and the body of the user, avoiding injuries and strain when exercising.
In a first aspect of the present invention, the exercise bench comprises cushions strategically located where the user's neck, middle/lower back, and knees are to be placed.
Another aspect of the present invention is that each cushion features indicia such as colors, words or symbols in order to indicate where the parts of the body should be placed on the bench to fully benefit from the shape of the cushions.
Another aspect of the present invention is that said invention provides for angular adjustment of the bench platforms, allowing for different types of bodies. The invention also allows for length adjustment.
The disclosure itself, both as to its configuration and its mode of operation will be best understood, and additional objects and advantages thereof will become apparent, by the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing.
The Applicant hereby asserts, that the disclosure of the present application may include more than one invention, and, in the event that there is more than one invention, that these inventions may be patentable and non-obvious one with respect to the other.
Further, the purpose of the accompanying abstract is to enable the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the public generally, and especially the scientists, engineers, and practitioners in the art who are not familiar with patent or legal terms or phraseology, to determine quickly from a cursory inspection the nature and essence of the technical disclosure of the application. The abstract is neither intended to define the invention of the application, which is measured by the claims, nor is it intended to be limiting as to the scope of the invention in any way.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein, constitute part of the specifications and illustrate the preferred embodiment of the invention.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention focuses on two different areas:
As shown in
Said steel tube is welded onto an angular base 301 which properly supports the distributed weight of the user, as seen on
The cushions to be placed on said metal platforms must avoid narrowed corners where germs could grow, which also allows for easier cleaning. The cushioning is essential for every user in order to distribute the pressure of the weight of the body at the point of interface, over a larger surface area. An overstuffed seating could provide discomfort, fatigue, and pain. The areas of greatest potential discomfort are located where the bone structures are closest to the skin due the compressive stress imposed on the body tissue.
The three main areas of the body (neck, middle/lower back, and knees) on which the cushioning is focused allows for lowered tension. This cushioning provides a more comfortable experience, and a higher engagement level with core muscles. An engaged core lowers risk for injuries and allows for more precise mechanics of movement during exercising.
Focusing on the importance of proper cushioning of areas like the coccyx, or buttocks homogenize a point for connection between the torso and the legs, which allows said metal platforms to integrate and work properly as a system.
Although certain exemplary embodiments and methods have been described in some detail, for clarity of understanding and by way of example, it will be apparent from the foregoing disclosure to those skilled in the art that variations, modifications, changes, and adaptations of such embodiments and methods may be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the claims. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention.
The invention is not limited to the precise configuration described above. While the invention has been described as having a preferred design, it is understood that many changes, modifications, variations and other uses and applications of the subject invention will, however, become apparent to those skilled in the art without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention after considering this specification together with the accompanying drawings. Accordingly, all such changes, modifications, variations and other uses and applications which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention are deemed to be covered by this invention as defined in the following claims and their legal equivalents. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses, if any, are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures.
All of the patents, patent applications, and publications recited herein, and in the Declaration attached hereto, if any, are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in their entirety herein. All, or substantially all, the components disclosed in such patents may be used in the embodiments of the present invention, as well as equivalents thereof. The details in the patents, patent applications, and publications incorporated by reference herein may be considered to be incorporable at applicant's option, into the claims during prosecution as further limitations in the claims to patently distinguish any amended claims from any applied prior art.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application 63/006,815, filed on Apr. 8, 2020, which the contents of which are fully incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4621809 | Pearl | Nov 1986 | A |
| 5348523 | Blount | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5830113 | Coody | Nov 1998 | A |
| 6015370 | Pandozy | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6899662 | Gamble | May 2005 | B2 |
| 9526939 | Longfellow | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9545540 | Moschel | Jan 2017 | B1 |
| 10029141 | Lagree | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10589144 | Specht | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10925793 | Sepulveda | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 20030050157 | Teuscher | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20040214692 | Koenig | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220028 | Gamble | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20070155604 | Hockemeyer | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225138 | Mednick | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080203776 | Mongelluzzo | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090188047 | Morse | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090253556 | Chaplik | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20110065554 | Van Straaten | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224059 | Crawley | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20130253582 | Tielve | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140141942 | Ford | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140243175 | Huang | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140342888 | Cecil | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150364058 | Lagree | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20180099176 | Specht | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20210316183 | Rios Ocasio | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101306477 | Mar 2012 | KR |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210316183 A1 | Oct 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63006815 | Apr 2020 | US |
