Surface mount ring assembly for loudspeaker

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6485241
  • Patent Number
    6,485,241
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 10, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 26, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Santos; Robert G.
    Agents
    • Samuels, Gauthier & Stevens
Abstract
A surface mount ring assembly for loudspeakers which comprises a ‘hard’ ring in which the speaker is secured. This hard ring is, in turn, secured to a resilient or ‘soft’ ring which soft ring is secured in the wall opening. The soft ring has a durometer of between 30 to 90 and a dynamic loss modulus of 1010 Dynes/cm2 at 100 to 1000 Hz. This effectively isolates the loudspeaker from the resonant frequency of the structure in which the speaker is secured.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




A mounting ring for a loudspeaker. The ring is frictionally fitted into a panel such as a wall or the interior panel of a vehicle. The loudspeaker is secured in the ring.




BACKGROUND AND BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In architectural loudspeaker installations loudspeaker drivers are installed into the interior and inside walls of buildings. The existing practice involves the use of a subassembly baffle to which one or more drivers are mounted. The baffle is then attached to the wall by means of assembly to a rough-in box which has been placed inside the wall. The rough-in box is a structural frame which requires an opening in the wall approximating the size of the baffle subassembly.




In the installation of loudspeakers in vehicles particularly in the aftermarket, holes are formed in the panels and a support structure is secured in the hole by fasteners, typically threaded fasteners. The loudspeaker is then secured to the support structure, again usually by threaded fasteners. This method of installation is time consuming and costly.




A vibration (resonant frequency) in the form of very low amplitude, omni-directional motion is naturally present in any building or vehicle. This frequency is present at varying levels from as low as 1 Hz up to 1000 Hz. When speakers are hard mounted into a wall or panel, these frequencies migrate to the speaker walls and interfere with the audio design frequencies of the speaker.




The present invention provides a significant improvement to the installation of either architectural or vehicular speakers by eliminating the rough-in box. An opening only the size needed to fit the ring is required. The elimination of the rough-in box greatly reduces installation time and labor. Additional benefits are a smaller (minimal) footprint for a cleaner look. The ring can also provide for integral attachment of the grill. The present invention isolates the speaker from the resonant frequency of the wall or panel in which it is mounted.




In installing a loudspeaker in the panel of a vehicle, a circular hole of the proper circumference is cut into the door panel forming a circular opening. The wires for the speaker can be ‘fished’ in the usual way, such as using a snake. The ring or speaker is inserted in the door panel. After the rings have been secured, the speaker is secured in the ring.




The present invention comprises a surface mount ring assembly for loudspeakers. The ring is received and secured in an opening solely by frictional engagement. The loudspeaker is received and secured in the ring solely by frictional engagement. The opening can be in any flat surface, wall, vehicular door panel etc. The ring isolates the speaker from the inherent resonance frequency in the structure in which the speaker is mounted.




Broadly the invention embodies a mounting ring assembly for speakers. The ring assembly comprises a ‘hard’ sleeve or ring in which the speaker is secured. This ring could be any suitable material, metal, polymeric material or the like. This sleeve in turn is secured to a resilient or ‘soft’ ring which ring is secured in the wall opening. The ring may either be a ring such as described in my parent application as the ‘inner ring’ or a sleeve-like ring. Either the inner or outer surfaces of the ring are roughened, preferably both surfaces, to enhance both the frictional engagement of the ring in the wall opening and to the sleeve which secures the speaker. Also, the composition of the ring per se has inherent ‘adhesive’ characteristics to further enhance the engagement of the components one to the other.




The speaker, generally comprises a sleeve having a back end and a front end. When assembled, the speaker/ring/sleeve and/or grill form an integrally mounted assembly with the following characteristics, the speaker is firmly mounted to a ‘wall’, the speaker is isolated from the inherent resonance in the wall by the ring. The ‘soft’ ring has a durometer of between 30 to 90 and a dynamic loss modulus of about 10


10


Dynes/cm


2


at 100 to 1000 Hz. The ‘hard’ sleeve can have a stiffness similar to polyvinyl chloride pipe or conduits. This ensures compression among the sleeve/ring/wall acts essentially only on the ring.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a ring of the invention;





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of an alternative ring of the invention;





FIG. 3

is a side view of an embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 4

is a side view of an alternative embodiment of

FIG. 3

;





FIG. 5

is a side view of a further alternative embodiment of

FIG. 3

;





FIG. 6

is a side view of an alternative embodiment of the invention wherein the sleeve is characterized by a flange at the open end thereof;





FIG. 7

is a side view of an alternative embodiment of

FIG. 6

;





FIG. 8

is a side view of a still further alternative embodiment using the ring of

FIG. 2

; and





FIG. 9

is a side view of an alternative embodiment of FIG.


8


.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)




Referring to

FIG. 1

, a ring is shown at


10


and comprises a roughened outer surface characterized by ribs


12


.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, a ring


14


has a roughened inner surface characterized by ribs


16


.




Preferably the rings


10


and


14


are formed of an elastomeric material, a visco elastic elastomer, i.e. butyl rubber, having a durometer of between 30 to 90, preferably between 40 to 50, and a dynamic loss modulus of about 10


10


Dynes/cm


2


at 100 to 1000 Hz. The selection of the material results in the ability of the ring to reduce transmission of vibrations from the loudspeaker to the panel by providing isolation and damping. Also, the loudspeaker is isolated from the vibrations inherent in the structure in which it is secured, whether a wall panel or door panel.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, a speaker


18


is shown in dotted lines. The ring


10


is secured in an opening


20


in a wall


22


. A hard sleeve


24


, e.g. a PVC tube, compression fits into the ring


10


fixedly securing the ring/sleeve into the wall. The ring


10


damps or isolates the speaker from the resonant frequency of the wall.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, a ring


26


includes flanges


26




a


and


26




b


which abut opposed surfaces of the wall


22


to enhance securing of the ring


26


to the wall


22


.




Referring to

FIG. 5

, a ring


28


is characterized by only one flange


28




b.






Referring to

FIG. 6

, in an alternative embodiment of the invention, a sleeve


30


is flanged at


30




a


and is used in combination with the ring


10


.




Referring to

FIG. 7

, the ring


28


, as shown in

FIG. 5

, is used with the sleeve


30


of FIG.


6


.




Referring to

FIG. 8

, in another alternative embodiment of the invention, a sleeve


32


extends through the wall


22


and the ring


14


of

FIG. 2

compression fits and secures the sleeve


32


. A band of ring-like material


34


is secured between the sleeve


32


and wall


22


for damping. In lieu of the band


34


, the ring


10


can be used in combination with the ring


14


.




Referring to

FIG. 9

, in an alternative embodiment of

FIG. 8

, the sleeve


32


is flanged at


32




a


and abuts the wall


22


.




The sleeves


24


,


30


,


32


have been shown as having smooth surfaces. This is because for the hard sleeve, manufacture is facilitated by extruding or molding with the smooth surfaces. However, it is to be understood that if desired the surfaces of the sleeve, either or both could be roughened, as described for the surfaces of the ring, to enhance the engagement of the parts one to the other.




The insertion of a speaker into the sleeve has been based on frictional engagement between a sleeve of the speaker and the sleeve as described. Obviously commercially available speakers assume various configurations and the speaker could also be secured to the sleeve such as by fasteners or adhesively or any combination of the foregoing.




The roughened surfaces of the rings have been described with reference to a rib-like structure. Any array of grooves, crenelations, striations, protrubences, either uniform or non-uniform, and either uniformly or non-uniformly formed on the surfaces are within the scope of the invention.




The foregoing description has been limited to a specific embodiment of the invention. It will be apparent, however, that variations and modifications can be made to the invention, with the attainment of some or all of the advantages of the invention. Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such variations and modifications as come within the true spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A surface mount ring assembly which comprises:a resilient damping ring having an inner and an outer surface, the outer surface configured to engage an opening in a wall; a hard sleeve configured to be compression fitted to the inner surface of the ring; and a loudspeaker, such that when the ring is secured in an opening in a wall and the sleeve is secured to the ring the speaker can be secured to the sleeve and thereby in the wall.
  • 2. The assembly of claim 1 wherein the ring has a rear edge characterized by a flange which flange is adapted to engage the opposed surface of the wall into which the ring is engaged.
  • 3. The assembly of claim 1 wherein the ring has front and rear edges, each edge is characterized by a flange which flange is adapted to engage the opposed surface of the wall in which the ring is engaged.
  • 4. The assembly of claim 1 wherein the sleeve has a front edge characterized by a flange, which flange is adapted to engage the opposed surface of the wall in which the ring is engaged.
  • 5. The assembly of claim 4 wherein the ring has a rear edge characterized by a flange which flange is adapted to engage the opposed surface of the wall in which the ring is secured.
  • 6. The assembly of claim 1 wherein the sleeve passes into and through the ring and a portion of the sleeve is adapted to extend beyond the wall and which comprises:a second ring compression fitted onto the portion of the sleeve which extends beyond the wall and which first ring is adapted to abut the opposed surface of the wall in which the ring is engaged.
  • 7. The assembly of claim 6 wherein the sleeve has a front edge characterized by a flange which flange is adapted to abut the wall in which the ring is engaged.
  • 8. The assembly of claim 1, 2, or 4 wherein the inner surface of the ring is roughened.
  • 9. The assembly of any of claim 1, 2, or 4 wherein the ring has a durometer of between 30 to 90.
  • 10. The assembly of any of claim 1, 2, or 4 wherein the ring has a loss modulus of about 1010 Dynes/cm2 at 100 to 1000 Hz.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/581,009 filed on Jan. 3, 1996 Now U.S. Pat. No. 5,636,955.

US Referenced Citations (55)
Number Name Date Kind
722061 Waldo, Jr. Mar 1903 A
1485571 Stevens Mar 1924 A
2115653 Snyder Apr 1938 A
2273491 Leedy Feb 1942 A
2308965 Riesing Jan 1943 A
2367832 Riesing Jan 1945 A
2520757 Cain Aug 1950 A
2583719 White Jan 1952 A
2774620 Thiry et al. Dec 1956 A
2828095 Beck et al. Mar 1958 A
2893722 Beck Jul 1959 A
2962312 Wanner Nov 1960 A
2993715 Hutton Jul 1961 A
3013643 Perry Dec 1961 A
3016562 Reid Jan 1962 A
3096106 Wanner Jul 1963 A
3112950 Jaskowiak Dec 1963 A
3128999 Schmitt Apr 1964 A
3304043 Beck Feb 1967 A
3350042 Stewart et al. Oct 1967 A
3479081 Schaaf Nov 1969 A
3532319 Brown Oct 1970 A
3675881 Caldwell Jul 1972 A
3678535 Charles Jul 1972 A
3895408 Leingang Jul 1975 A
4062637 Allison Dec 1977 A
4067531 Sikula Jan 1978 A
4076195 Uhler Feb 1978 A
4295691 Rubenthaler Oct 1981 A
4306708 Gassaway et al. Dec 1981 A
4358098 Ceseri Nov 1982 A
4416446 Murakami Nov 1983 A
4521004 Caldwell Jun 1985 A
4522378 Nelson Jun 1985 A
4732519 Wagner Mar 1988 A
4921371 Boiraeu et al. May 1990 A
4975008 Wagner Dec 1990 A
5110081 Lang, Jr. May 1992 A
5139361 Camuffo Aug 1992 A
5189779 Fishel et al. Mar 1993 A
5277554 Elson Jan 1994 A
5335893 Opp Aug 1994 A
5397206 Sihon Mar 1995 A
5551826 Todd et al. Sep 1996 A
5577854 Jacob et al. Nov 1996 A
5609329 Scholl Mar 1997 A
5651535 David Jul 1997 A
5659924 Gildersleeve Aug 1997 A
5683215 Gaignard et al. Nov 1997 A
5765819 Hummel Jun 1998 A
5806139 Anderson et al. Sep 1998 A
5871319 Schneider Feb 1999 A
6059503 Johnson May 2000 A
6099190 Honobe et al. Aug 2000 A
6280132 Szuczukowski et al. Aug 2001 B1
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/581009 Jan 1996 US
Child 08/872239 US