Surface stabilized cathode material for lithium ion batteries and synthesizing method of the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11462736
  • Patent Number
    11,462,736
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 26, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 4, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
A compound represented by LiaCo(1-x-2y)Mex(M1M2)yOδ, (Formula (I)) wherein Me, is one or more of Li, Mg, Al, Ca, Ti, Zr, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ru and Sn, and wherein 0≤x≤0.3, 0
Description
FIELD

The described embodiments relate to electrodes for lithium-ion based batteries. In particular embodiments, electrode compositions include lithium cobalt oxide containing nickel and manganese pairs, or other metal pairs, in prescribed proportions for achieving high energy capacity and stable electrodes.


BACKGROUND

Lithium-ion batteries are one of the most popular types of rechargeable batteries used in a number of consumer electronics. Due to their relative high energy density compared to other types of batteries, lithium-ion batteries can be manufactured in small sizes and are therefore widely the used in portable electronic devices. With the increasing capabilities of portable electronic devices, more components and features are included within the portable electronic devices, thereby leaving less room for batteries. Therefore there is a need for higher volumetric energy density electrodes, which can be manufactured in smaller batteries. Furthermore, longer lasting batteries that endure more reversible charge-discharge cycles are desirable. Thus, there is a demand for high-energy lithium-ion batteries with long-term cycle stabilities.


SUMMARY

This disclosure describes various embodiments that relate to lithium cobalt oxide compositions having nickel-manganese pairs or other heterogeneous atomic pairs. The heterogeneous atomic pairs can be metal pairs. The lithium cobalt oxide compositions exhibit high energy and cycle stability.


In a first aspect, a compound is represented by Formula (I):

LiαCo(1-x-2y)Mex(M1M2)yOδ  (Formula (I))


wherein Me selected from one or more of Li, Mg, Al, Ca, Ti, Zr, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ru and Sn;


wherein M1 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state;


wherein M2 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state; and


wherein 0≤x≤0.3, 0<y≤0.4, 0.95≤α≤1.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10.


According to another aspect, a compound is represented by:

LiαCo(1-2y)(M1M2)yOδ  (Formula (II))


wherein M1 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state;


wherein M2 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state;


wherein M1M2 represents metal pairs; and


wherein 0<y≤0.4, 0.95≤α≤1.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10, is described.


According to another aspect, a compound is represented by:

LiαCoβM3γ(M4M5)εOδ  (Formula (III))


wherein M3 is one or more manganese, nickel, aluminum, magnesium, titanium, zirconium, calcium, vanadium, chromium, iron, copper, zinc, ruthenium or a combination thereof;


wherein M4 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state;


wherein M5 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state;


wherein M4M5 represents pairs of M4 and M5; and wherein 0.95≤α≤1.4, 0.3≤β≤1.0, 0≤γ≤0.7, 0<ε≤0.4 and 1.90≤δ≤2.10. In some cases, M4 is one or more of nickel, magnesium, and zinc. In some cases, M5 is one or more of manganese, titanium, zirconium, ruthenium, tin, and vanadium.


According to another aspect, a compound is represented by:

LiαCoβM4M5)εOδ  (Formula (IV))


wherein M4 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state;


wherein M5 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state;


wherein M4M5 represents pairs of M4 and M5; and


wherein 0.95≤α≤1.4, 0.3≤β≤1.0, 0<ε≤0.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10 is described.


According to an additional aspect, a particle is described.


According to an additional aspect, a particle that includes compounds in a single particle is described. In one aspect, the particle comprises compounds selected from:

a) LiaCobM6cOδ  Formula (V)

    • wherein M6 is one or more of manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), aluminum (Al), magnesium (Mg), titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), calcium (Ca), vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and ruthenium (Ru); and wherein 0.90<a≤1.1, wherein 0.5≤b≤1.0, wherein 0<c≤0.5, and wherein 1.90≤δ≤2.10; and

      (b) LiaCoβM3γ(M4M5)εOδ,  Formula (III)


wherein M3 is one or more of manganese, nickel, aluminum, magnesium, titanium, zirconium, calcium, vanadium, chromium, iron, copper, zinc, ruthenium,


wherein M4 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state,


wherein M5 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state,


wherein M4M5 represents pairs of M4 and M5, and

    • wherein 0.95≤α≤1.4, 0.3≤β≤1.0, 0≤γ≤0.7, 0<ε≤0.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10.


The particle comprising compounds represented by:

(a) LiαCo(1-x-2y)Mex(M1M2)yOδ  Formula (I)


wherein Me is one or more of Li, Mg, Al, Ca, Ti, Zr, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ru and Sn,


wherein M1 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state;


wherein M2 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state;


wherein M1M2 represents metal pairs; and


wherein 0≤x≤0.3, 0<y≤0.4, 0.95≤α≤1.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10; and

(b) LiαCoβM3γ(M4M5)εOδ,  Formula (III)


wherein M3 is one or more of manganese, nickel, aluminum, magnesium, titanium, zirconium, calcium, vanadium, chromium, iron, copper, zinc, ruthenium,


wherein M4 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state,


wherein M5 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state,


wherein M4M5 represents pairs of M4 and M5, and


wherein 0.95≤α≤1.4, 0.3≤β≤1.0, 0≤γ≤0.7, 0<ε≤0.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10.


Alternatively, the particle can include compounds represented by Formula (II) and/or Formula (IV), as described herein. In various aspects, the compounds of Formula (I) and Formula (III) can be different.


The particle includes a core and a coating disposed on the core. The core can be any cathode active material known in the art. In some variations, the core can be a compound of Formula (V), Formula (I), or Formula (II). Further, the coating can be a compound of Formula (III) or Formula (IV).


According to another embodiment, a cathode for a lithium-ion battery is described. The cathode includes a composition, or combination of compositions, described above.


According to a further embodiment, a method of synthesizing a lithium-oxide cathode active material for a lithium-ion battery is described. The method includes reacting a metal solution with a chelate agent and a base solution at an alkaline pH to form a particulate solution through a coprecipitation process; washing, filtering and drying the particulate solution to collect hydroxide precursor particles; blending the collected particles with a lithium salt; and reacting the blended particles at a first elevated temperature to produce base particles.


These and other aspects of the disclosure will be described in detail below and it is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the disclosure as claimed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements.



FIG. 1 shows a crystal structure model of a cobalt oxide portion of a lithium cobalt oxide composition, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 2 shows a graph illustrating a relationship between the number and type of metal pairs within a lithium cobalt oxide material and relative total energy, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 3 shows a graph illustrating relative energy of battery cells as a function of number of atomic pairs, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIGS. 4 and 5 show scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of a lithium cobalt oxide composition with nickel-manganese pairs at higher and lower magnifications, respectively according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 6 shows MAS NMR spectra for lithium cobalt oxide compositions having nickel-manganese pairs, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 7 shows a differential capacity analysis plot for a battery cell having a cathode with a lithium cobalt oxide composition with nickel-manganese pairs according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 8 shows Raman spectra of lithium cobalt oxide compositions having nickel-manganese pairs and lithium cobalt oxide compositions without nickel-manganese pairs.



FIG. 9 shows a heat flow versus temperature graph comparing thermal stability of different cathode materials, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 10 shows a flowchart indicating a method of forming a battery cell with an electrode with a lithium cobalt oxide composition having nickel-manganese pairs, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIGS. 11A-11D show coated particles for cathode materials in accordance with some embodiments.



FIGS. 12A and 12B show SEM images of uncoated and coated particles having various lithium cobalt oxide compositions, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 13 shows Raman spectra of particles coated and uncoated coated with various lithium cobalt oxide compositions, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 14 shows a graph illustrating energy retention of battery cells having various lithium cobalt oxide compositions, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 15 shows a graph illustrating energy retention of battery cells having particles of different coating compositions after a number of charge and discharge cycles, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 16 shows a graph illustrating energy retention of half cells having particles of different compositions after a number of charge and discharge cycles, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIGS. 17A-17E show capacity analysis plots for battery cells having various lithium cobalt oxide compositions, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 18 shows an electronic device having a battery, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIGS. 19A-19C show X-ray diffraction patterns of various lithium cobalt oxide compositions, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 20 shows a graph illustrating energy retention of cells having particles of different compositions at a higher temperature, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 21 shows an SEM image of spherical transition metal hydroxide particles prepared by a coprecipitation process, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 22 shows an SEM image of a coprecipitated precursor that has been ground to sub-micron size, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 23 shows an SEM image of calcined particles in accordance with the disclosure.



FIG. 24 is SEM images showing an effect of calcination temperature on the extent of reaction of the overlay with the base particle, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 25 is a process of flow chart showing an alternative method of overlay using metal ion solution, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 26 is a graph showing discharge capacity v. cycling demonstrating improved capacity retention overlay by overlaying NM1616, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 27 is a graph of normalized energy retention illustrating the improved retention of overlaid materials, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 28 is a graph showing the average voltage with cycling improved with ab increase of MN161 content, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 29 is a Raman microspectroscopy spectra showing that the overlay surface is similar to bulk NM1616, according to an illustrative embodiment;



FIG. 30 is a differential scanning calorimetry showing better thermal stability with NM1616 overlay, according to an illustrative embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to representative embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the following descriptions are not intended to limit the embodiments to one preferred embodiment. To the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as can be included within the spirit and scope of the described embodiments as defined by the appended claims.


Lithium cobalt oxide compositions suitable for use in lithium-ion battery cells are described. In some embodiments, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions are doped with pairs of metals. The first metal has a +2 oxidation state (e.g., Ni), and the second metal has a +4 oxidation state (e.g., Mn). The first and second metals form pairs within a base cobalt oxide lattice structure. Without being limited to a particular mechanism or mode of action, the pairs can form a lower energy and more stable lattice configuration. In this way, the metal pairs (e.g., Ni—Mn pairs) can provide lithium-ion electrodes that are less susceptible to structural degradation after numerous charge and discharge cycles compared to lithium cobalt oxide compositions without metal pairs. The metal pairs are also associated with a stable cathode interface with electrolyte, thereby providing better surface stability at high charge voltage compared to battery cells with lithium cobalt oxide electrode compositions without metal pairs. In some embodiments, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions include heterogeneous atomic pairs other than nickel and manganese, and that can also be associated with high energy capacity battery cells.


Lithium cobalt oxide compositions described herein can be characterized by any suitable technique, including Raman spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Charge and discharge cycling of a battery cell having lithium cobalt oxide compositions with metal pairs indicate a better capacity retention over numerous cycles compared to a battery cell having the lithium cobalt oxide compositions without metal pairs.


In some embodiments, lithium cobalt oxide compositions having heterogeneous atomic pairs are in the form of a coating that covers a core particle material. The core can be composed of a lithium cobalt oxide composition without heterogeneous atomic pairs, or can be composed of other suitable cathode material. The combination of core and coating materials can provide a surface-stable high energy cathode.


In other embodiments, the particle can be a combination of compounds (e.g., by a sintered core and coating). A first compound can be composed of any suitable material for a cathode active material known in the art. The first compound can be composed of a lithium cobalt oxide composition without heterogeneous atomic pairs, or can be composed of other suitable cathode material. In some embodiments, the first compound can be represented by the formula LiTM1-xMexO2 wherein TM is Co, Mn or Ni; Me is Li, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru. In other embodiments, the first compound can be represented by the formula LiMn2-xMexO4, wherein Me is Li, Ni, Co, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru. In further embodiments, the first compound can be represented by the formula LiTM1-xMexPO4, wherein TM is Co, Mn, Ni or Fe; Me is Li, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru. In additional embodiments, the first compound can be represented by the formula Li2MO3*LiTM1-xMexO2, wherein M is Mn, Ru, Ti or Zr, TM is Co, Mn or Ni, Me is Li, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru. In still further, first compound can be a compound of Formula (I) or Formula (II), as described herein. The second compound can be a compound of Formula (III) or Formula (IV), as described herein. The combination of the two materials in the particles can provide a surface-stable high energy cathode.


The particles can also be coated with a dielectric material to protect the lithium cobalt oxide material from chemical agents within the battery electrolyte that can degrade the lithium cobalt oxide material.


The lithium cobalt oxide compositions described herein are well suited for use in electrodes of lithium-ion batteries for any of a number of suitable consumer electronic products. For example, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions described herein can be used in batteries for computers, portable electronic devices, wearable electronic devices, and electronic device accessories, such as those manufactured by Apple Inc., based in Cupertino, Calif.


These and other embodiments are discussed below with reference to FIGS. 1-30. However, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the detailed description given herein with respect to these Figures is for explanatory purposes only and should not be construed as limiting.


Materials described herein are based on lithium cobalt oxide compositions and are suitable for application in positive electrodes of lithium-ion based batteries. In some embodiments, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions can be represented by:

LiαCo(1-x-2y)Mex(M1M2)yOδ  (Formula (I))


where Me is one or more of lithium (Li), magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), calcium (Ca), titanium (Ti), zirconia (Zr), vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), ruthenium (Ru) and tin (Sn); and where 0≤x≤0.3, 0≤y≤0.4, 0.95≤α≤1.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10. Note that Me can be a single element or combination of elements. In some cases, Me includes a suitable transition metal. M1M2 represents pairs of M1 and M2. In some cases, M1 is nickel and M2 is manganese.


In the case where x is zero, the lithium cobalt oxide composition can be represented by:

LiαCo(1-2y)(M1M2)yOδ  (Formula (II))

wherein M1 and M2 are described as above.


The lithium cobalt oxide compositions in accordance with Formulae (I) and (II) can be used as positive electrodes (cathodes) within lithium-ion battery cells. The lithium cobalt oxide compositions include the substitution of some cobalt (Co) with a pair of first and second metals (which can be referred to as “metal pairs”). The first metal has a +2 oxidation state, and the second metal has a +4 oxidation state. The first metal can be nickel, and the second metal can be manganese, which form nickel-manganese pairs (which can be referred to as “Ni—Mn pairs”). Metal pairs (e.g., Ni—Mn pairs) are short-range pairing of the first and second metal within the crystal structure of the lithium cobalt oxide compositions. Without wishing to be limited to a particular embodiment or mode of action, the metal pairs are associated with more stable oxide compositions compared to oxide compositions without the metal pairs, thereby providing a more robust framework for Li intercalation and deintercalation and better cycle life lithium-ion battery cells, which will be described below in detail.


In some embodiments, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions include atomic pairs of metals other than nickel and manganese. For example, in some embodiments, one of the atomic pairs is a transition metal having a +4 oxidation state and the other is an element having a +2 oxidation state. These atomic pairs include different elements, and thus can be referred to as heterogeneous atomic pairs. For instance, in addition to or instead of Ni—Mn pairs, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions can include one or more of nickel and titanium (Ni—Ti) pairs, magnesium and titanium (Mg—Ti) pairs, magnesium and manganese (Mg—Mn) pairs, nickel and zirconium (Ni—Zr) pairs, magnesium and zirconium (Mg—Zr) pairs, etc. In some embodiments, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions include more than one type of atomic metal pairs. For example, a lithium cobalt oxide composition can include Ni—Mn pairs as well as one or more of Ni—Ti pairs, Mg—Mn pairs, Mg—Ti pairs, Ni—Zr pairs, Mg—Zr pairs, Ni—V pairs, Mg—V pairs, etc. That is, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions can include any suitable combination of +4 transition metal-containing pairs.


In some embodiments, x is 0. In some embodiments of Formula (I), 0<x≤0.3. In some embodiments of Formula (I), x is greater than or equal to 0.1. In some embodiments of Formula (I), x is greater than or equal to 0.2. In some embodiments of Formula (I), x is less than or equal to 0.3. In some embodiments of Formula (I), x is less than or equal to 0.2.


In some embodiments of Formula (I), y is greater than or equal to 0.1. In some embodiments of Formula (I), y is greater than or equal to 0.2. In some embodiments of Formula (I), y is greater than or equal to 0.3. In some embodiments of Formula (I), y is less than or equal to 0.4. In some embodiments of Formula (I), y is less than or equal to 0.3. In some embodiments of Formula (I), y is less than or equal to 0.2. In some embodiments of Formula (I), y is less than or equal to 0.1. In some embodiments, 0.20≤y≤0.25. In some embodiments, 0.02≤y≤0.06. In some embodiments, 0.05≤y≤0.09. In some embodiments, 0.08≤y≤0.12. In some embodiments, 0.14≤y≤0.18. In some embodiment, 0.20≤y≤0.25.


In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is greater than or equal to 0.95. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is greater than or equal to 0.98. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is greater than or equal to 1.0. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is greater than or equal to 1.1. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is greater than or equal to 1.2. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 1.4. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 1.3. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 1.2. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 1.1. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 1.2. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 1.1. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 1.0. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 0.99. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 0.98. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 0.97. In some embodiments of Formula (I), α is less than or equal to 0.96.


It will be understood that substituent quantities can be in any combination, as described herein.


In some embodiments, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions can be represented by:

LiαCoβM3γ(M4M5)εOδ  (Formula (III))

where M3 is one or more of manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), aluminum (Al), magnesium (Mg), titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), calcium (Ca), vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and ruthenium (Ru); where M4 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state; where M5 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state; and where 0.9≤α≤1.4, 0.3≤β≤1.0, 0≤γ≤0.7, 0<ε≤0.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10.


In particular embodiments, M4 is one or more of nickel (Ni), magnesium (Mg), and zinc (Zn); and M5 is one or more of manganese (Mn), titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), and vanadium (V).


In some embodiments, γ is 0. In some embodiments of Formula (III), 0<γ≤0.3. In some embodiments of Formula (III), γ is greater than or equal to 0.1. In some embodiments of Formula (III), γ is greater than or equal to 0.2. In some embodiments of Formula (III), γ is less than or equal to 0.3. In some embodiments of Formula (III), γ is less than or equal to 0.2.


In some embodiments of Formula (III), ε is greater than or equal to 0.1. In some embodiments of Formula (III), ε is greater than or equal to 0.2. In some embodiments of Formula (III), ε is greater than or equal to 0.3. In some embodiments of Formula (III), ε is less than or equal to 0.4. In some embodiments of Formula (III), ε is less than or equal to 0.3. In some embodiments of Formula (III), ε is less than or equal to 0.2. In some embodiments of Formula (III), ε is less than or equal to 0.1. In some embodiments, 0.20≤ε≤0.25. In some embodiments, 0.02≤ε≤0.06. In some embodiments, 0.05≤ε≤0.09. In some embodiments, 0.08≤ε≤0.12. In some embodiments, 0.14≤ε≤0.18. In some embodiment, 0.20≤ε≤0.25.


In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is greater than or equal to 0.95. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is greater than or equal to 0.98. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is greater than or equal to 1.0. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is greater than or equal to 1.1. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is greater than or equal to 1.2. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 1.4. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 1.3. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 1.2. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 1.1. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 1.2. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 1.1. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 1.0. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 0.99. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 0.98. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 0.97. In some embodiments of Formula (III), α is less than or equal to 0.96.


In some embodiments of Formula (III), β is greater than or equal to 0.3. In some embodiments of Formula (III), β is greater than or equal to 0.5. In some embodiments of Formula (III), β is greater than or equal to 0.7. In some embodiments of Formula (III), β is greater than or equal to 0.9. In some embodiments of Formula (III), β is less than or equal to 1.0. In some embodiments of Formula (III), β is less than or equal to 0.8. In some embodiments of Formula (III), β is less than or equal to 0.6. In some embodiments of Formula (III), β is less than or equal to 0.4.


It will be understood that any substituent quantities in any Formula can be in any combination, as described herein.


In another embodiment, the lithium cobalt oxide particles can include a combination of compounds of Formula (V) and Formula (III) as follows:

(a) LiaCobM6cOδ  (Formula (V))

where M6 is one or more of manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), aluminum (Al), magnesium (Mg), titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), calcium (Ca), vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and ruthenium (Ru); and where 0.90≤a≤1.1, 0.5≤b≤1.0, 0<c≤0.5, 1.90≤δ≤2.10; and

(b) LiαCoβM3γ(M4M5)εOδ  (Formula (III))

wherein M3 is one or more of manganese, nickel, aluminum, magnesium, titanium, zirconium, calcium, vanadium, chromium, iron, copper, zinc, ruthenium,


wherein M4 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state,


wherein M5 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state,


wherein M4M5 represents pairs of M4 and M5, and


wherein 0.95≤α≤1.4, 0.3≤β≤1.0, 0≤γ≤0.7, 0<ε≤0.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10.


In some instances, M6 can be the combination of i) Mn, Ni, or the combination of Mn and Ni, and ii) Al as a dopant.


In some embodiments, Formula (V) is a layered hexagonal rock-salt structure represented as LiTM1-xMexM7O2; where TM is Co, Mn or Ni; Me is Li, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru. In some cases, the core has a spinel cubic structure represented as LiMn2-xMexO4; where Me is Li, Ni, Co, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru. In some embodiments, the core has an olivine structure represented as LiTM1-xMexPO4; where TM is Co, Mn, Ni or Fe; Me is Li, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru. In some embodiments, the core is a layered-layered material such as represented by Li2MO3*LiTM1-xMexO2; where M is Mn, Ru, Ti or Zr; TM is Co, Mn or Ni; Me is Li, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru.


A concentration of compound (b) LiαCoβ(M4M5)εOδ can be gradually increased or decreased in the compound (a) LiaCobM6cOδ Formula (V) from a localized position to surrounding directions. Further, the composition may include a dielectric coating on the compound (b) LiαCoβM1γ(M4M5)εOδ.


In another embodiment, the lithium cobalt oxide particles can include a combination of compounds of Formula (I) and Formula (III) as follows:

(a) LiαCo(1-x-2y)Mex(M1M2)yOδ  (Formula (I))

wherein Me is one or more of Li, Mg, Al, Ca, Ti, Zr, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ru and Sn, and wherein 0≤x≤0.3, 0<y≤0.4, 0.95≤α≤1.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10; and

(b) LiαCoβM3γ(M4M5)εOδ  (Formula (III))

wherein M3 is one or more of manganese, nickel, aluminum, magnesium, titanium, zirconium, calcium, vanadium, chromium, iron, copper, zinc, ruthenium,


wherein M4 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state,


wherein M5 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state,


wherein M4M5 represents pairs of M4 and M5, and


wherein 0.95≤a≤1.4, 0.3≤β≤1.0, 0≤γ≤0.7, 0≤ε≤0.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10.


M1M2 represents pairs of M1 and M2. M1 can be nickel and M2 can be manganese. M1 can be one or more of nickel, magnesium, and zinc. M2 can be one or more of manganese, titanium, zirconium, and vanadium. The particle has an energy density higher at an interior of the particle than at a surface of the particle and has energy retentive properties higher at a surface of the particle than at an interior of the particle.


A concentration of compound (b) LiαCoβM1γ(M4M5)εOδ can be gradually increased or decreased in the compound (a) LiαCo(1-x-2y)Mex(M1M2)yOδ from a localized position to surrounding directions. Also, the composition may include a dielectric coating on the compound (b) LiαCoβM1γ(M4M5)εOδ.


In another embodiment, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions can be represented by a combination of Formula (II) and Formula (IV) as follows:

(a) LiαCo(1-2y)(M1M2)yOδ  (Formula (II))

wherein 0<y≤0.4, 0.95≤α≤1.4, 1.90≤δ≤2.10, and wherein M1M2 represents nickel-manganese pairs; and

(b) LiαCoβ(M4M5)εOδ  (Formula (IV))

wherein M4 is a metal having a +2 oxidation state,


wherein M5 is a metal having a +4 oxidation state,


wherein M4M5 represents pairs of M3 and M4, and


wherein 0.95≤α≤1.4, 0.3≤β≤1.0, 0<ε≤0.4 and 1.90≤δ≤2.10.


In some variations, M4 can be one or more of nickel, magnesium, and zinc. In some variations, M5 can be one or more of manganese, titanium, zirconium, and vanadium. The particle including the compounds of Formula (I) and Formula (III) can have an energy density higher at an interior of the particle than at a surface of the particle and has energy retentive properties higher at a surface of the particle than at an interior of the particle. A concentration of compound (b) LiαCoβM1γ(M4M5)εOδ (Formula (III)) can be gradually increased or decreased in the compound (a) LiαCo(1-x-2y)Mex(M1M2)yOδ (Formula (I)) from a localized position to surrounding directions. Also, a dielectric coating may be disposed on the particle.


In other variations, this Formula (V) can be represented as represented by Formula (VIa) or Formula (VIb).


Formula (VIa) is represented by the following formula:

(v)[M7O2].(1-v)[Co1-σM8O2]  (Formula VIa)

wherein M7 is one or more elements with an average oxidation state of 4+(i.e., tetravalent); M8 is one or more monovalent, divalent, trivalent, and tetravalent elements; 0.01≤v<1.00, and 0≤σ≤0.05. In some variations, M7 is selected from Mn, Ti, Zr, Ru, and a combination thereof. In some variations, M8 is selected from B, Na, Mg, Ti, Ca, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Al, Sc, Y, Ga, Zr, Ru, Mo and a combination thereof. In some variations, M7 is Mn. In some variations, M8 is Al.


In some embodiments, 0.01≤v≤0.50. In some embodiments, 0.01≤v≤0.50. In some embodiments, 0.01≤v≤0.30. In some embodiments, 0.01≤v<0.10. In some embodiments, 0.01≤v<0.05. In some variations, 0<σ≤0.05. In some variations, 0<σ≤0.03. In some variations, 0<σ≤0.02. In some variations, 0<σ≤0.01. In some variations, 0.01≤v<0.05, and 0<σ≤0.05.


In some variations, Al is at least 500 ppm. In some variations, Al is at least 750 ppm. In some variations, Al is at least 900 ppm. In some variations, Al is less than or equal to 2000 ppm. In some variations, Al is less than or equal to 1500 ppm. In some variations, Al is less than or equal to 1250 ppm. In some variations, Al is less than or equal to 1000 ppm. In some variations, Al is less than or equal to 900 ppm. In some variations, Al is less than or equal to 800 ppm. In some variations, Al is less than or equal to 700 ppm. In some variations, Al is less than or equal to 600 ppm. In some instances, when M8 (e.g., Al) is expressed in ppm, in optional variations, the compound can be represented as (v)[Li2M7O3].(1-v)[LiαCowO2] and the amount of M8 can be represented as M8 in at least a quantity in ppm, as otherwise described above. In some embodiments, 0.5≤w≤1. In some embodiments, 0.8≤w≤1. In some embodiments, 0.96≤w≤1. In some embodiments, 0.99≤w≤1. In some embodiments, w is 1.


Formula (VIb) is represented by the following formula:

(v)[Li2M7O3].(1-v)[LiαCo1-σM8σO2]  (Formula VIb)

wherein M7 is one or more elements with an average oxidation state of 4+(i.e., tetravalent); M8 is one or more monovalent, divalent, trivalent, and tetravalent elements; 0.95≤α≤0.99; 0.01≤v<1.00, and 0.5≤w≤1, and 0≤σ≤0.05. In some variations, M7 is selected from Mn, Ti, Zr, Ru, and a combination thereof. In some variations, M8 is selected from B, Na, Mg, Ti, Ca, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Al, Sc, Y, Ga, Zr, Ru, Mo and a combination thereof. In some variations, M7 is Mn. In some variations, M8 is Al.


In some embodiments, 0.01≤v≤0.50. In some embodiments, 0.01≤v<0.50. In some embodiments, 0.01≤v≤0.30. In some embodiments, 0.01≤v<0.10. In some embodiments, 0.01≤v<0.05. In some variations, 0<σ≤0.05. In some variations, 0<σ≤0.03. In some variations, 0<σ≤0.02. In some variations, 0<σ≤0.01. In some variations, 0.95≤σ<0.99, 0.01≤v<0.05, 0.96≤w<1, and 0<σ≤0.05.


In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is at least 500 ppm. In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is at least 750 ppm. In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is at least 900 ppm. In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is less than or equal to 2000 ppm. In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is less than or equal to 1500 ppm. In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is less than or equal to 1250 ppm. In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is less than or equal to 1000 ppm. In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is less than or equal to 900 ppm. In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is less than or equal to 800 ppm. In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is less than or equal to 700 ppm. In some variations, M8 (e.g., Al) is less than or equal to 600 ppm. In some instances, when M8 (e.g., Al) is expressed in ppm, the compound can be represented as (v)[Li2M7O3].(1-v)[LiαCowO2] and the amount of M8 can be represented as M8 in at least a quantity in ppm, as otherwise described above. In some variations, 0.5≤w≤1. In some variations, 0.8≤w≤1. In some variations, 0.96≤w≤1. In some variations, 0.99≤w≤1. In some variations, w is 1.


It will be understood that the substituents in Formulae (II) can be in any variation as described for Formula (I), and the substituents for Formula (IV) can be in any variation as described for Formula (III).


In some embodiments, the compositions in accordance with Formulae I-IV are cobalt-rich, meaning that the atomic percentage of cobalt is larger than the atomic percentages of the first and second metal. It should be noted, however, that the embodiments described herein are not limited to cobalt-rich compositions. As indicated by Formulae I and II, the amount of metal pairs within the lithium cobalt oxide compositions can vary in accordance with y—which can be associated with variables x, α and δ.


In addition to the metal pairs (e.g., Ni—Mn pairs), the lithium content within the lithium cobalt oxide compositions can be controlled. In some embodiments, α is less than 1—in which case the lithium cobalt oxide composition can be referred to as lithium-deficient since the composition has relatively less lithium than cobalt and Me and/or metal pairs. That is, the lithium cobalt oxide composition has less than the nominal stoichiometric amount of lithium. In other embodiments, a is greater than 1—in which case the lithium cobalt oxide composition can be referred to as lithium-rich since the composition has relatively more lithium than cobalt and Me and/or metal pairs. That is, the lithium cobalt oxide composition has greater than the nominal stoichiometric amount of lithium.


With regard to oxygen, in accordance with Formulae (I)—(V), the amount of oxygen can be greater or less than a nominal stoichiometric amount of oxygen. That is, in some embodiments, δ is greater or less than two. This variance of δ from 2 can compensate for a charge deficiency within the lithium cobalt oxide composition due to variations in one or more of the other elements: x, y and α, in Formula (I), y and α in Formula (II), α, β, γ, and ε in Formula (III), and α, β, and ε in Formula (IV). In particular, δ can be greater or less than 2 in order to create a charge-neutral lithium cobalt oxide composition.


Stable atomic configurations of lithium cobalt oxide compositions in accordance with Formulae (I) or (II) can be calculated using, for example, density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Table 1 below shows DFT energy calculations performed on several atomic configurations having about 4 atomic % nickel and about 4 atomic % manganese (referred to herein as “NM44”). Table 1 shows calculated energy, relative energy, relative energy per formula unit, and probabilities of Ni—Mn pairs, Mn—Mn pairs, and Ni—Ni pairs for 15 different configurations.















TABLE 1








Relative








E (meV)/




Relative E
formula
Ni—Mn
Mn—Mn
Ni—Ni


Configuration
E (eV)
(eV)
unit
pairs
pairs
pairs





















c1
−1791.3512
0.557253
7.7
6
3
3


c2
−1791.7716
0.136899
1.9
8
2
2


c3
−1790.8628
1.045661
14.5
4
3
3


c4
−1791.1392
0.769254
10.7
4
3
3


c5c
−1791.2836
0.624940
8.7
6
3
1


c6
−1791.6337
0.274809
3.8
6
1
3


c7
−1791.8346
0.073948
1.0
7
0
0


c8
−1791.7485
0.160006
2.2
6
0
0


c9
−1791.8638
0.044662
0.6
7
0
0


c10
−1791.7407
0.167785
2.3
7
1
1


c11
−1791.9085
0.000000
0.0
8
1
0


c12
−1791.1349
0.773651
10.7


c13
−1791.2917
0.616757
8.6
4
1
1


c14
−1791.1372
0.771294
10.7


c5
−1791.1107
0.797835
11.1
4
1
1









Table 1 indicates that of the several possible structural model configurations considered, c11 shows the lowest relative energy with 8 Ni—Mn pairs, 1 Mn—Mn pair and 0 Ni—Ni pairs. The second and third lowest relative energy configurations are c7 and c9, both of which have 7 Ni—Mn pairs, 0 Mn—Mn pairs and 0 Ni—Ni pairs. This indicates that the configurations having the most Ni—Mn pairs relative to Mn—Mn pairs and 0 Ni—Ni pairs can be associated with a low energy configuration—that is, are calculated to be the most stable.



FIG. 1 illustrates a crystal structure model of the configuration c11. The crystal structure model in FIG. 1 shows nickel, manganese, cobalt, Me and oxygen atoms arranged in a trigonal crystal structure (R-3m), sometimes referred to as a rhombohedral lattice structure. It should be noted that FIG. 1 shows a crystal structure model of a cobalt oxide portion of the lithium cobalt oxide composition and lithium is not shown since lithium ions are transported between the cathode and anode of the lithium-ion battery cell. In particular, the cathode material is composed of layers of cobalt oxide structure doped with nickel and manganese (and in some cases Me), with layers of mobile lithium in between the doped cobalt oxide layers. During discharging, lithium ions in the battery cell move from the cathode via an electrolyte to the anode, thereby allowing electrons to flow as electric current. During charging, the lithium ions move from the anode via the electrolyte to the cathode.



FIG. 1 illustrates that when nickel and manganese are added to cobalt oxide layers, the nickel and manganese form a short-range order distribution. For example, the Ni and Mn atoms can be attracted to each other and form a chemical bond, thereby resulting in NiMn pairs within the LiCoO2 crystal structure. That is, nickel and manganese are not randomly distributed within the crystal structure, but rather ordered in Ni—Mn pairs. In particular, the Ni—Mn pairs are predicted to reside within a sub-lattice of the LiCoO2 crystal structure, as shown in FIG. 1. It is believed that these Ni—Mn pairs provide a short-range order that results in a lower energy and more stable structure compared to a LiCoO2 structure without Ni—Mn pairs.



FIG. 2 shows a graph illustrating a relationship between the number and type of metal pairs within a lithium cobalt oxide material and relative total energy (meV/f.u.), as calculated using DFT. The DFT calculations are based on the number of Ni—Mn pairs, Mn—Mn pairs and Ni—Ni pairs within a lithium cobalt oxide lattice structure. These calculated results indicate that the greater amounts of Ni—Mn pairs in lithium cobalt oxide compositions, the lower relative total energies, and therefore more stable the material than lithium cobalt oxide compositions with lesser amounts of Ni—Mn pairs and having Mn—Mn pairs and Ni—Ni pairs. Thus, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions having metal pairs containing one atom in a +4 oxidation state (Mn) and the other atom in a +2 oxidation state (Ni) are calculated to provide a more stable lithium cobalt oxide composition than those having pairs of the same type of atoms.


Embodiments described herein are not limited to NM44 compositions. For example, “NM77” (having about 7 atomic % nickel and about 7 atomic % manganese), “NM1010” (having about 10 atomic % nickel and about 10 atomic % manganese), and “NM1616” (having about 16 atomic % nickel and about 16 atomic % manganese) also show evidence of short-range ordering due to Ni—Mn pairs. In fact, any suitable compositions in accordance with the Formulae described herein may have short-range ordering due to NiMn pairs. The Ni—Mn pairs within the LiCoO2 structure can be characterized by Raman spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). Described below are some data using these and other characterization techniques.


Table 2 below shows MAS NMR peak assignments for the NM1616 samples of FIG. 3. The peak assignments marked in bold can be considered fingerprints for Ni—Mn short-range order interaction.











TABLE 2





Measured NMR

(calculated


Spectra Shift

shift for


(ppm)
Possible Assignments
configuration)

















−23
1Nist
−15


−47
1Mnnd
−60


−81
1Nist 1Mnnd
−75


−98
2Nist 1Mnnd
−90


−136
1Nist 2Mnnd
−135


4.8
2Mnst 4Nist 3Mnnd
4


55
1Nind 2Nist 1Mnnd
50


88
1Nind 1Mnnd
84


125
1Nind or 2Mnst 2Mnnd or
140 or 130 or 124



2Nind 6Nist 1Mnnd


194
2Mnst 1Nind 4Nist
204 or 190



2Mnnd or 2Nind 6Nist


230
1Nind 1Mnst2Nist or
232 or 244 or 220



2Mnstor 2Nind 1Mnnd


330
2Mnst 1Nind 1Mnnd
324


523
2Mnst 2Nind
524


688
4Mnst 2Nist 1Mnnd
678



2Nind










FIG. 3 shows a graph illustrating data based on first principle calculations of relative energy of different cathode compositions as a function of the number of atomic pairs (M4M5) within the lithium cobalt oxide structure. Atomic pairs include Mn—Ni pairs and Ni—Ti pairs. The relative energy is calculated with respect to lowest energy configuration of each composition. For example, Mn—Ni pair calculations used 4 atomic % Mn—Ni pairs, and Ni—Ti pair calculations used 4 atomic % Ni—Ti pairs. This graph indicates a clear association of higher atomic pairs and higher relative energy.



FIGS. 4 and 5 show scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of an NM77 composition at higher and lower magnifications, respectively. FIG. 5A shows a single particle of a NM77 composition and FIG. 5B shows multiple particles of a NM77 composition.



FIG. 6 shows magnetic angle spinning (MAS) NMR spectra for NM1616 samples. The chemical shifts related to both Ni and Mn ions. In particular, labeled peaks within the MAS NMR spectra correspond to Ni—Mn short range order interaction within the lithium cobalt oxide structure. These labeled peaks can be taken as finger prints that Ni and Mn ions exist at adjacent Li+ ions.


Table 3 below summarizes some properties of an NM77 composition, specifically, Li1.004Co0.86(Ni0.07Mn0.07)O2, as well as characteristics of a lithium-ion cell having a positive electrode with the NM77 composition.












TABLE 3





Property
MN44
MN77
MN1616


















Average working voltage
3.98
4.09
3.93


at 0.2 C discharge


rate 4.6-2.75 V (V)


Specific 1st discharge
210
204
200


capacity at 0.2 C,


4.6-2.75 V cutoff (mAh/g)


1st cycle
92
96
92


efficiency, %


Lattice parameter based
a = 2.8209,
a = 2.8223,
a = 2.838,


on R-3m space group
c = 14.0836
c = 14.1140
c = 14.162


(Å)









As indicated above in Table 3, the NM77 composition has R-3m lattice structure characterized as having lattice parameters a=2.82231 Å and c=14.11403 Å, and the NM1616 composition has R-3m lattice structure characterized as having lattice parameters a=2.838 Å and c=14.162 Å—which are generally larger than a and c values for a LiCoO2 structure without Ni—Mn pairs (e.g., a commercial LiCoO2 has a=˜2.815 Å, c=˜14.07 Å). In general, the compositions having Ni—Mn pairs provide refined lattice parameters of a≥2.817 Å and c>14.070 Å. It is believed this larger dimensioned R-3m lattice structure provides larger spacing between layers of each of the NM77 and NM1616 compositions, thereby providing improved intercalation of lithium ions between the layers as the battery cell is charged and discharged. As described above, the Ni—Mn pairs generally provide a more stable R-3m lattice structure compared to a LiCoO2 structure without Ni—Mn pairs. It is believed that this more stable lattice structure is less vulnerable to collapse or sliding as lithium ions are removed and replaced, thereby providing a more reliable lattice structure for the lithium ions to move into and out of. That is, the Ni—Mn pairs result in a cathode that is capable of enduring more charge and discharge cycles without lattice structure breakdown compared to a LiCoO2 structure without Ni—Mn pairs. The same is true for metal pairs, as described herein.


Table 3 also indicates that a battery cell having the NM77 composition is characterized as operating with a specific first discharge capacity is significantly higher than that of a LiCoO2 battery without Ni—Mn pairs. Specifically, a NM77 composition battery cell can operate at a specific first discharge capacity of about 215 mAh/g compared to about 170 mAh/g for a LiCoO2 battery without Ni—Mn pairs.



FIG. 7 shows a differential capacity analysis (dQ/dV) plot for a battery cell having an NM77 electrode composition. In general, a dQ/dV plot is used to indicate the tendency of a battery cell to degrade over a number of charge and discharge cycles. Voltage (V) and charge (Q) data are collected as the cells are charged and discharged a designated number of cycles. These data are then differentiated to create differential capacity, dQ/dV (V, n), versus V for the nth measured cycle. FIG. 7 shows a dQ/dV plot for 5, 10 and 15 cycles. The top curves (having dQ/dV above zero) correspond to charge cycles and the bottom curves (having dQ/dV below zero) correspond to discharge cycles.



FIG. 7 shows that the dQ/dV curves for 5, 10 and 15 cycles have very similar shapes and closely overlap with each other. This indicates that the performance of the battery cell with the NM77 electrode composition is stable over these charge/discharge cycles, indicating a very stable crystal lattice structure over numerous cycles of lithium ion transport. In contrast, of dQ/dV curves of standard battery cells with commercially available LiCoO2 electrode compositions will show degradation after about 10 cycles—i.e., the peaks of the curves will lessen or even disappear at around 10 cycles.


The peaks of the dQ/dV curves correspond to voltage potentials at which maximum lithium ion transport occurs, and at which maximum electron flow occurs. Standard battery cells with commercially available LiCoO2 electrode compositions typically have a maximum voltage potential of about 3.7 V. FIG. 7 indicates that the battery cell with the NM77 electrode composition maximum reside around 3.9 V. These results indicate that, in addition to degrading less than standard LiCoO2 electrodes, NM77 electrodes also provides a marked increase in battery energy (corresponding to a higher energy capacity) compared to standard LiCoO2 electrodes. In some embodiments, a lithium-ion battery having a cathode with a composition in accordance with Formula (I) or 2 will provide a maximum voltage potential of at least 3.9 V.


Table 4 below summarizes some performance characteristics of sample battery cells (1-8) having positive electrodes of different compositions, including different NM77 compositions, a standard LiCoO2 composition without nickel or manganese (referred as “LCO”), and a Li1.02Co0.95Mn004O2 (referred as “LCMnO”).

















TABLE 4





Sample No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8







cathode composition
NM77
NM77
NM77
NM77
NM77
NM77
LCO
LCMnO


Li/M
Li0.969
Li0.989
Li1.004
Li1.02
Li1.03
Li1.04




(M = Co0.93 Mn0.07)


1st cycle charge
220 mAh/g
223 mAh/g
229 mAh/g
227 mAh/g
228 mAh/g
224 mAh/g
238 mAh/g
229 mAh/g


capacity


1st cycle discharge
206 mAh/g
209 mAh/g
215 mAh/g
212 mAh/g
214 mAh/g
210 mAh/g
232 mAh/g
214 mAh/g


capacity


1st cycle efficiency
94%
94%
94%
93%
94%
94%
98%
94%


1st cycle average
4.09 V    
4.08 V    
4.09 V    
4.08 V    
4.07 V    
4.07 V    
4.07 V    
4.10 V    


discharge V


52nd cycle discharge
191
193
198
196
197
196
181
167


capacity


52nd cycle discharge V
4.06
4.04
4.07
4.05
4.05
4.05
3.85
4.06


Capacity retention %
93
93
92
93
92
93
78
78


(52nd/1st cycle)


Energy retention %
92
92
91
92
92
93
74
77


(52nd/1st cycle)


1st cycle energy
3362
3410
3523
3451
3484
3412
3779
3515









Table 4 shows data for 1st cycle charge and discharge capacities (mAh/g) for the cells at 0.1° C. between 4.6V and 2.75V, 1st cycle efficiency (%), 1st cycle average discharge voltage (V), 52nd cycle average discharge capacity (mAh/g) for the cells at 0.1° C. between 4.6V and 2.75V, and 52nd cycle average discharge voltage (V)—each averaged over three cells. Table 4 also shows data for capacity retention % and energy retention % of 52nd cycle versus 1st cycle.


Table 4 indicates that the cells having NM77 electrode compositions show less performance degradation over charge/discharge cycles compared to the cells having LCO and LCMnO electrode compositions. In particular, the capacity retention and energy retention percentages of 52nd cycles versus 1st cycles are much higher for the cells having NM77 electrode compositions (i.e., 93% and 92%) compared to the cells having LCO and LCMnO electrode compositions (i.e., 78%, 74% and 77%). These data further support the above-described improved stability provided by the Ni—Mn pairs with the NM77 electrode compositions. In some embodiments, a lithium-ion battery having a cathode with a composition in accordance with Formula (I) or 2 will provide a charge capacity retention (52nd/1st cycle) of at least 92%.



FIG. 8 shows Raman spectra of layered compositions of LiCoO2 (reference LCO), LiCoO2 composition with 7 atomic % manganese and no nickel, and Ni—Mn substituted LiCoO2 of different amounts of Ni—Mn (specifically, NM44, NM77, NM1010 and NM1616). According to the factor-group analysis, the layered LiCoO2 with R-3m structure is predicted to show two Raman-active A1g and Eg modes, which are observed at around 596 cm−1 and around 486 cm−1, respectively. With the addition of Mn or Ni—Mn into the structure, a peak at around 320 cm−1 is observed, which increases intensity with increasing amounts of Ni—Mn pairs. In addition, increasing amounts of Ni—Mn pairs result in a peak around 450 cm−1. Furthermore, Ni—Mn pairs are associated with peaks at frequencies above the 596 cm−1 band and below the 486 cm−1 band due to the Mn—O and Ni—O vibrations. The intensity of the scattering above 596 cm−1 band seems to increase with increasing Mn substitution, and decreasing with increasing Ni substitution. In addition, increasing Ni substitution slightly decreasing the frequency of the Ni—Mn induced scattering below 486 cm−1.



FIG. 9 shows a heat flow versus temperature graph comparing thermal stability of different cathode materials. The graph of FIG. 9 shows results in accordance with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) techniques for analyzing phase transitions of materials when heat is applied. The graph shows heat flow curves for a NM77 composition (marked as LiCo0.86(NiMn)0.07O2), a lithium cobalt oxide having 4 atomic % manganese (marked as LiCo0.96Mn0.04O2), a lithium cobalt oxide having 7 atomic % manganese (marked as LiCo0.93Mn0.07O2), and an undoped lithium cobalt oxide (marked as LiCoO2). The cathode materials where harvested when being charged to 4.45V.


In general, peaks in a DSC curve correspond to exothermic or endothermic reactions, which are often accompanied with structural change of a lithium cobalt oxide material. The onset temperature is defined as the lowest temperature at which the material initiates an exothermic reaction. The graph of FIG. 9 indicates that the undoped lithium cobalt oxide composition has a relative low onset temperature, i.e., around 150° C. The graph indicates the NM77 composition has a higher onset temperature, i.e., around 180° C. However, the lithium cobalt oxide compositions having 4% and 7% manganese experienced structural changes at even higher temperatures, i.e., around 250° C. These results indicate that lithium cobalt oxide compositions having 4% and 7% manganese have better thermal stability than the undoped lithium cobalt oxide material and NM77 material.



FIG. 10 shows flowchart 1000 indicating a method of forming a battery cell with an electrode with a lithium cobalt oxide composition having Ni—Mn pairs, in accordance with some embodiments. At 1002, a nickel-manganese-cobalt precursor is formed. At 1004, the nickel-manganese-cobalt precursor is combined with a lithium oxide (e.g., Li2CO3) in to form a solid-state lithium cobalt oxide composition having Ni—Mn pairs. At 1006, the lithium cobalt oxide composition having Ni—Mn pairs is incorporated into an electrode for a battery cell.


In some embodiments, the lithium cobalt compositions in accordance with Formulae (I)-(IV) are in the form of a coating. FIGS. 11A-11D show coated particles for cathode materials, in accordance with some embodiments. In these coated particle embodiments, a lithium cobalt oxide composition having heterogeneous atomic pairs are in the form of a coating around a core material of a different composition. In some cases, this configuration can improve the thermal stability of the cathode material.



FIG. 11A shows a lithium battery cathode particle 1100 that includes coating 1102, in accordance with some embodiments. Particle 1100 represents one of a number of similar particles within a cathode for a lithium ion battery cell. Particle 1100 is represented as having a spherical shape—however, particle 1100 can have any suitable shape, including a globular or other non-spherical shape. Particle 1100 includes core 1101, which can be composed of any suitable cathode material, such as layered cathode, spinel cathode, olive cathode (e.g., layered LiTMO2, spinel LiM2O4, LiMPO4, Li2MnO3*LiTMO2). In some embodiments, core 1101 is composed of a lithium cobalt oxide material. In some embodiments, core 1101 is composed of a lithium cobalt oxide represented by:

LiaCobM6cOδ  (Formula (V))

where M6 is one or more of manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), aluminum (Al), magnesium (Mg), titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), calcium (Ca), vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and ruthenium (Ru); and where 0.90≤a≤1.1, 0.5≤b≤1.0, 0<c≤0.5, 1.90≤δ≤2.10. In some instances, M6 can be Mn, Ni, or the combination of Mn and Ni, along with Al as a dopant.


For example, core 1101 can be composed of lithium cobalt oxide doped with manganese. In some embodiments, core 1101 includes a lithium cobalt oxide doped with about 4 atomic % manganese or a lithium cobalt oxide doped with about atomic 7 atomic % manganese. In some embodiments, core 1101 is composed of a high voltage, high volumetric energy density material, such as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2014/0272563A1, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Compositions in accordance with Formula (V) have high thermal stability when exposed to relatively high temperatures compared to other lithium cobalt oxide compositions. Thus, a cathode composed of a lithium cobalt oxide material in accordance with Formula (V) will retain structural integrity at relatively high temperatures.


In some embodiments, the core is selected from a layered hexagonal rock-salt structure represented as LiTM1-xMexM7O2; where TM is Co, Mn or Ni; Me is Li, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru. In some cases, the core has a spinel cubic structure represented as LiMn2-xMexO4; where Me is Li, Ni, Co, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru. In some embodiments, the core has an olivine structure represented as LiTM1-xMexPO4; where TM is Co, Mn, Ni or Fe; Me is Li, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru. In some embodiments, the core is a layered-layered material such as represented by Li2MO3*LiTM1-xMexO2; where M is Mn, Ru, Ti or Zr; TM is Co, Mn or Ni; Me is Li, Mg, Al, Ti, Zr, Ca, V, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn or Ru.


Core 1101 is covered with coating 1102 (which can also be referred to as a shell), which can be composed of a lithium cobalt oxide composition in accordance with one or more of Formulae (I), (II), (III), or (IV). That is, coating 1102 can be composed of a lithium cobalt oxide having heterogeneous atomic pairs, such as Ni—Mn pairs. As described above, lithium cobalt oxide having heterogeneous atomic pairs generally have a more stable crystal structure than undoped lithium cobalt oxide compositions and lithium cobalt oxide compositions having homogeneous atomic pairs (e.g., Ni—Ni or Mn—Mn pairs). In addition, lithium cobalt oxide compositions having heterogeneous atomic pairs are found to have higher capacity and energy retention after cycle life testing.


One of the advantages of particle 1100 having coating 1102 of one composition and core 1101 of a different composition is that each composition can provide different benefits. In particular, core 1101 can provide high thermal stability to particle 1100 while coating 1102 can provide relatively higher energy retention to particle 1100. In addition, some lithium cobalt oxide compositions having atomic pairs (i.e., in accordance with one or more of Formulae (I), (II), (III), or (IV)) can have a lower true density and lower average discharge voltage than a lithium cobalt oxide composition without atomic pairs (e.g., in accordance with Formula (V)). That is, core 1101 can allow for denser packing of a lithium cobalt oxide composition (i.e., provide a higher volumetric energy density for the battery cell). Thus, core 1101 can provide high energy density and high thermal stability, and coating 1102 can provide high energy retention.


The relative volumes of core 1101 and coating 1102 can vary. In some embodiments, the relative volume of core 1101 is greater than that of coating 1102. In some cases, the thickness of coating 1102 ranges from about a couple of (i.e., two) nanometers to about five micrometers, and the diameter of particle 1100 ranges from about couple of (i.e., two) micrometers to about thirty micrometers.



FIG. 11B shows a lithium battery cathode particle 1104, in accordance with other embodiments. Particle 1104 includes coating 1102, which can be composed of a lithium cobalt oxide in accordance with one or more of Formulae (I), (II), (III), or (IV). In addition, second coating 1106 covers coating 1102. Thus, in the embodiment show in FIG. 11B, coating 1102 can be referred to as a first coating.


Second coating 1106 can be composed of a dielectric material, such as one or more of aluminum oxide (Al2O3), aluminum fluoride (AlF3), aluminum phosphate (AlPO4), zirconium oxide (ZrO2), titanium oxide (TiO2), magnesium oxide (MgO) etc. In some embodiments, second coating 1106 has a porous structure such that portions of first coating 1102 are uncovered and exposed, thereby providing access to the lithium cobalt oxide composition of first coating 1102. In this way, lithium ions can pass through second coating 1106 during charge and discharge cycles. One of the functions of second coating 1106 can be to prevent or reduce exposure of second coating 1106 (and sometimes core 1101) to hydrogen fluoride (HF), which can exist within the battery electrolyte. It is believe the HF can degrade a lithium oxide-based material. Therefore, by reducing exposure of first coating 1102 to HF can reduce degradation of first coating 1102 (and sometimes core 1101), thereby slowing down the impedance growth as a result of degraded surface of particle 1100 and decreasing the electrical resistance of the battery cell. In this way, second coating 1106 can stabilize the surface of particle 1100 with respect to the electrolyte composition.


The thickness of second coating 1106 can vary depending on a number of factors. In some embodiments, the thickness of second coating 1106 ranges from less than about one nanometer to about a couple of (i.e., two) micrometers. In some cases, the thickness of coating 1102 ranges from about a couple of (i.e., two) to about five micrometers, and the diameter of particle 1104 ranges from about a couple of (i.e., two) micrometers to about thirty micrometers.



FIG. 11C shows a lithium battery cathode particle 1108, in accordance with other embodiments. Particle 1108 includes core 1101, which is covered with coating 1102 (also referred to as a first coating or a lithium cobalt oxide coating doped with atomic pairs) composed of a lithium cobalt oxide in accordance with one or more of Formulae (I), (II), (III), or (IV), as well as second coating 1106 composed of a dielectric material. In contrast to particle 1104 of FIG. 11B, second coating 1106 is positioned between core 1101 and first coating 1102. In some cases, this arrangement with coating 1102 being the outermost layer of particle 1108 provides a cathode material having good thermal stability and energy retention. In some embodiments, the thickness of second coating 1106 ranges from less than about one nanometer to about a couple of (i.e., two) micrometers. In some cases, the thickness of coating 1102 ranges from about couple of nanometers to about five micrometers, and the diameter of particle 1104 ranges from about couple of (i.e., two) micrometers to about thirty micrometers.



FIG. 11D shows a lithium battery cathode particle 1110, in accordance with other embodiments. Particle 1110 includes core 1101, which is covered with coating 1102 composed of a lithium cobalt oxide composition in accordance with one or more of Formulae (I), (II), (III), or (IV). Particle 1110 also includes second coating 1106 and third coating 1112, which are each composed of dielectric material. In some cases, this arrangement with particle 1108 having layers of dielectric coatings and between layers of lithium cobalt oxide material provides a cathode material having good thermal stability and energy retention.


It should be noted that the particles presented in FIGS. 11A-11D can have any suitable shape, including spherical, globular or other non-spherical shape. The size of the particles presented in FIGS. 11A-11D can vary depending on a number of factors. In some embodiments, the particles in FIGS. 11A-11D have a diameter ranging from about couple of (i.e., two) micrometers to about thirty micrometers.


It should also be noted that the embodiments described above with reference to FIGS. 11A-11D are presented as examples and that any suitable combination and number of coatings can be used in order to create a cathode material having a prescribed performance, such as energy density, thermal stability, discharge capacity, dQ/dV values, etc. That is, the particles can be composed of one or more lithium cobalt oxide coatings doped with atomic pairs and/or one or more dielectric coatings, arranging in any suitable order. Put another way, the particles can include multiple first coatings and/or multiple second coatings.


Methods of forming coated particles, such as particle 1100, 1104, 1108 and 1110, can include any of a number of suitable coating techniques. One technique involves forming a solution of a nickel-manganese-cobalt precursor using the techniques described above. Then, particles formed of a core material are immersed in the solution such that the core material becomes coated with the nickel-manganese-cobalt material. Another technique involves forming nanoparticles of the nickel-manganese-cobalt precursor. The nanoparticles are then applied to surfaces of particles formed of the core material. The nanoparticles can be applied using dry or wet blending techniques. In some cases, a calcination or melting process following the blending process is applied to stabilize the nanoparticles to surfaces of the particles composed of the core material.



FIGS. 12A and 12B show SEM images of uncoated and coated particles. FIG. 12A shows particles composed of a lithium cobalt manganese oxide composition, and FIG. 12B shows particles composed of a lithium cobalt manganese oxide composition core having a coating composed of a composition having Ni—Mn pairs. As shown, the coated particles (FIG. 12B) appear to have different surface textures compared to the uncoated particles (FIG. 12A).



FIG. 13 shows Raman spectra of particles having different compositions, some coated and some not coated. Compositions include an uncoated 4 atomic % manganese LiCoO2 composition (4% Mn), a 4 atomic % manganese LiCoO2 core covered with a 3 atomic % NiMn LiCoO2 composition (3% NM coated), a 4 atomic % manganese LiCoO2 core covered with a 4 atomic % NiMn LiCoO2 composition (4% NM coated), a 4 atomic % manganese LiCoO2 core covered with a 5 atomic % NiMn LiCoO2 composition (5% NM coated), and an uncoated 16 atomic % NiMn LiCoO2 composition (NM1616).


The Raman spectra of FIG. 13 indicate that after coating with compositions having Ni—Mn pairs, the shoulder peak at around 650 cm−1 is more pronounced compared to the uncoated 4% Mn composition. Furthermore, the shoulder peak at around 650 cm−1 is even more pronounced in the uncoated NM1616 composition. This indicates that samples having coatings with compositions having Ni—Mn pairs are more stable than to the uncoated 4% Mn composition, but that uncoated NM1616 composition provides even better stability. It should be noted, however, that the coating configuration could provide a more surface stable high-energy cathode. Thus, these factors should be considered and balanced when designing a battery cell for a particular application.



FIG. 14 shows a graph illustrating energy retention of battery cells having LiCoO2 (standard, commercially available), NM44, NM77, NM1010, and NM1616 cathode compositions. In each graph, the energy retention values (y-axis) are normalized with respect to a first cycle. The graph of FIG. 14 indicates that battery cells having higher amounts of Ni—Mn pairs have higher energy retention over 50 cycle counts.



FIG. 15 shows a graph illustrating energy retention of battery cells having particles of different coating compositions after a number of charge and discharge cycles. Performance of a battery cell with particles having LiCo0.96Mn0.04O2 core with an Al2O3 coating compared to a battery cell with particles having LiCo0.96Mn0.04O2 core with a Ni—Mn and an Al2O3 coating. The energy retention (y-axis) is normalized with respect to the first cycle. The graph of FIG. 15 indicates that the battery cell with particles having a Ni—Mn and Al2O3 coating has higher energy retention over 28 cycle counts.



FIG. 16 shows a graph illustrating energy retention (%) of half cells having particles of different coating compositions after a number of charge and discharge cycles. The half cells are coin cell cycled at C/5 2.75-4.5V at 25 degrees C. Performance of a half cell with particles having Al2O3 coating is compared to a battery half cell with particles having a Ni—Mn and Al2O3 coating. The graph of FIG. 16 indicates that the half cell with particles having a Ni—Mn and Al2O3 coating has higher energy retention over about 46 cycle counts.



FIGS. 17A-17E show capacity analysis (dQ/dV) plots for battery cells having LiCoO2 (standard, commercially available), NM44, NM77, NM1010, and NM1616 cathode compositions, respectively. Each dQ/dV plot is based on performance of a coin half cell at C/5 charge/discharge rate 2.75-4.6V. The solid lines in the plots are dQ/dV curves of a 1st cycle after formation cycle, and the dotted lines are dQ/dV curves every 5 cycles thereafter. FIGS. 17A-17E indicate that the performance of the battery cell with the NM44, NM77, NM1010, and NM1616 cathode compositions are stable over numerous charge/discharge cycles compared to the standard battery cells with commercially available LiCoO2 composition.


The battery cells described herein can be used in any suitable electronic device, such as device 1800 of FIG. 18. In some cases, electronic device 1800 is a consumer electronic device, such as a portable computing device (e.g., mobile phone, tablet device, wearable device, laptop, media player, camera, etc.). Electronic device 1800 includes interface 1802, which can include a user input component and a user output component. For example, interface 1802 can include visual display, visual capture, audio output, audio input, button, keypad, touch screen, sensor and other components. Electronic device 1800 also includes processor 1804, which can pertain to a microprocessor or controller for controlling operation of electronic device 1800. Electronic device 1800 further includes memory 1806, which can be accessed by one or more components of electronic device 1800 and can include random-access memory (RAM) and read-only memory (ROM). Electronic device 1800 also includes battery 1808, which can provide power to various components of electronic device 1800. Battery 1808 can correspond to rechargeable lithium-ion battery that includes one or more battery cells in accordance with embodiments described herein.



FIGS. 19A-19C show X-ray diffraction patterns of NM77, 4% Mn and LCO (standard LiCoO2) compositions before and after 50 charge/discharge cycles. The compositions prior to charging/discharging are referred to as “pristine”. Each sample was cycled between 2.75 V and 4.6 V at C/5 rate. FIG. 19A shows that the NM77 composition cathode had no structural changes, as indicated by not change in location or shape of X-ray diffraction peak between 18.8 and 18.9 two-theta degrees. This indicates that the crystal structure of the NM77 composition shows good reversibility. In contrast, FIGS. 19B and 19C show the 4% Mn and LCO compositions show significant shifting and changes in the shape at the peak between 18.8 and 18.9 two-theta degrees after the 50 charge/discharge cycles. That is, the crystal structures of the 4% Mn and LCO samples have irreversible change after cycle testing.


The battery cell performance of the different compositions will depend on the specific composition—e.g., extent of Ni—Mn pairing, amount of Me (if any)—as well as other factors. That is, any suitable atomic percentages can be used in accordance with the Formulae (I)-(IV).



FIG. 20 shows a graph illustrating energy retention (%) of cells (single layer pouch cells) with different compositions at higher temperatures after a number of charge cycles. Each cell was cycled at 0.7 C charge, 1 C discharge, with a reference point test (RPT) at C/5 charge/discharge every 25 cycles using 2.75-4.45V at 45 degrees C. As shown, the cell having the LiCo0.86(NiMn)0.07O2 composition has a much higher energy retention at higher temperatures compared to the cell without NiMn pair composition.


Methods of forming the compositions in accordance with Formulae (I) and (II) can vary. Example 1 below presents a method of forming a NM77 composition, specifically LiCo0.86Ni0.07Mn0.07O2, in accordance with some embodiments.


Example 1

An aqueous solution of manganese, nickel and cobalt sulfate (Mn:Ni:Co mole ratio 7:7:86) are dripped into a reactor having heated water. Ethylene Diamine Triacetic Acid (EDTA) is added and the pH is fixed at 10.5 by adding a basic solution. After some time, nickel-manganese-cobalt precursor particles form (e.g., in salt form such as an oxide or a hydroxide), which are then washed, filtered and dried. The precursor particles are mixed with Li2CO3 in solid state by varying the ratio of Li/metal to 0.96, 1.0 and 1.04. Following mixing, the mixed powder was heated then cooled. The sample was subsequently ground, then sieved and re-fired at higher temperatures and allowed to cool. The final sintered black powder was sieved for use in an electrochemical test as a cathode active material.


It should be noted that embodiments described herein are not limited to the methods described in Example 1. For example, other methods of forming the precursor particles can be used. For instance, other methods of mixing manganese, nickel and cobalt in solution state and precipitating out homogenous combined particles may be used. Alternatively, manganese, nickel and cobalt can be combined in solid state (e.g., in the form of manganese sulfate, nickel sulfate and cobalt sulfate). In other embodiments, a spray-dry process is used to form the precursor particles.


Examples 2-5 below present methods of forming coated particle compositions, in accordance with some embodiments.


Example 2: NM77 Coating on Li1.04Co0.96Mn0.04O2 Core

A predetermined amount of base powder (i.e., Li1.04Co0.96Mn0.04O2) is weighed out in a container. An amount of cobalt and nickel, manganese and lithium precursor needed for a desired amount of LiCo0.86Mn0.07Ni0.07O2 coating (e.g., 1, 2 and 3 wt. %) is calculated based on the weighed amount of base powder. The transition metal precursors include salts of cobalt, nickel and manganese, such as nitrate, acetate, or other salts soluble in water or alcohol. The lithium precursor is in in the form of a carbonate, hydroxide, acetate, oxalate, nitrate or any suitable combination thereof. The transition metal precursors and lithium precursor are dissolved in a small amount of water or alcohol to form a mixed solution. The mixed solution is added drop-wise onto the base powder while stirring. The mixed solution added is such that the base powder is incipiently wet and well mixed (i.e., exhibits a damp consistency). After drying at 50-80° C., the dried base powder is heat-treated at 700° C. for 5 hours in stagnant air.


Example 3: NM1616 Coating on Li1.04Co0.96Mn0.04O2 Core

A predetermined amount of base powder (i.e., Li1.04Co0.96Mn0.04O2) is weighed out in a container. An amount of cobalt and nickel, manganese and lithium precursor needed for a desired amount of LiCo0.68Mn0.16Ni0.16O2 coating (e.g., 1, 2 and 3 wt. %) is calculated based on the weighed amount of base powder. The transition metal precursors include salts of cobalt, nickel and manganese, such as nitrate, acetate, or other salt soluble in water or alcohol. The lithium precursor is in in the form of a carbonate, hydroxide, acetate, oxalate, nitrate or any suitable combination thereof. The transition metal precursors and lithium precursor are dissolved in a small amount of water or alcohol to form a mixed solution. The mixed solution is added drop-wise onto the base powder while stirring. The mixed solution is added such that the base powder is incipiently wet and well mixed (i.e., exhibits a damp consistency). After drying at 50-80° C., the dried base powder is heat-treated at 700° C. for 5 hours in stagnant air.


Example 4: NM1616 Coating on LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 Core

A predetermined amount of base powder (i.e., LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2) is weighed out in a container. An amount of cobalt and nickel, manganese and lithium precursor needed for a desired amount of LiCo0.68Mn0.16Ni0.16O2 coating (e.g., 1, 2 and 3 wt. %) is calculated based on the weighed amount of base powder. The transition metal precursors include salts of cobalt, nickel and manganese, such as nitrate, acetate, or other salt soluble in water or alcohol. The lithium precursor is in in the form of a carbonate, hydroxide, acetate, oxalate, nitrate or any suitable combination thereof. The transition metal precursors and lithium precursor are dissolved in a small amount of water or alcohol to form a mixed solution. The mixed solution is added drop-wise onto the base powder while stirring. The mixed solution is added such that the base powder is incipiently wet and well mixed (i.e., exhibits a damp consistency). After drying at 50-80° C., the dried base powder is heat-treated at 500° C. for 5 hours in stagnant air.


Example 5: NM1616 Coating on LiNi0.82Co0.13Mn0.055O2 Core

A predetermined amount of base powder (i.e., LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2) is weighed out in a container. An amount of cobalt and nickel, manganese and lithium precursor needed for a desired amount of LiCo0.68Mn0.16Ni0.16O2 coating (e.g., 1, 2 and 3 wt. %) is calculated based on the weighed amount of base powder. The transition metal precursors include salts of cobalt, nickel and manganese, such as nitrate, acetate, or other salt soluble in water or alcohol. The lithium precursor is in in the form of a carbonate, hydroxide, acetate, oxalate, nitrate or any suitable combination thereof. The transition metal precursors and lithium precursor are dissolved in a small amount of water or alcohol to form a mixed solution. The mixed solution is added drop-wise onto the base powder while stirring. The mixed solution is added such that the base powder is incipiently wet and well mixed (i.e., exhibits a damp consistency). After drying at 50-80° C., the dried base powder is heat-treated at 500° C. for 5 hours in stagnant air.


In some embodiments described below, various methods of synthesizing hydroxide precursors are disclosed in Examples 6-11.


Example 6

Hydroxide precursors with the desired transition metal combination, for example: Co0.97Mn0.03(OH)2 were synthesized via a coprecipitation process. During the process, a metal sulfate solution of the targeted composition and a NaOH solution were independently pumped into a 4 L continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) with the pH and temperature well controlled. At the same time, complexing agents (NH4OH or EDTA) were introduced into the tank to control the growth and density of the hydroxide particles. Additionally, a cover gas of N2 is bubbled into the reactor to prevent the oxidation of the transition metals. After an initial growth time, the particles in the reactor begin to round and densify. The precursor is collected from the process as dense spherical particles, having tap densities as high as 2.00 g/cc. The powder cake is washed, filtered, and dried. The resulting precursor particles are composed of plate-like primary grains (FIG. 21). The primary grains are densely woven into spherical secondary particles with the D50 ranging between 15-25 um. This powder is used as a precursor that is later blended with other particles, such as lithium salts, and other precursor powders to be reacted together in a high-temperature process to produce a lithiated-oxide material with the desired properties for a high-energy density Li-ion cathodes. The spherical shape and the wide particle distribution of these particles allow them to be packed with the highest packing efficiency, which is critical for the high electrode density.


Example 7

A coprecipitation process as described in Example 1 is started. The composition of the present material is chosen for its high energy retention, although its energy density may be considered substandard. In this example, the particles are immediately harvested from the reactor and washed. At this early stage of coprecipitation, the particles are irregular-shaped and have an open cancellous structure. The precursor particles are milled in water to produce sub-micron particles, which are subsequently filtered and dried (FIG. 22). This precursor (FIG. 22) is dry-blended with the appropriate amount of Li-salt and the base particles prepared in Example 1. The mixture is calcined in air at a temperature, for example 1085° C., and process time, for example 15 h, such that the particles interact and form a particulate material with the physical, chemical and electrochemical properties described as the inventive material (FIG. 23).


Example 8

The coprecipitated precursors are produced as described in Examples 6 and 7. The base material (Example 6) is blended with an appropriate amount of lithium salt and calcined at the required temperature and time to produce particulates with a similar morphology to those shown in FIG. 23. These particles are blended with the sub-micron hydroxide precursor described in Example 7 and with an appropriate amount of Li-salt. The mixture is heat treated at a temperature and time, for example from 500-1050° C. for 5 h, to react the fine particles with the lithium salt and sinter the fine particles to and into the surface of the pre-calcined base particles (FIG. 24). The sintering temperature and time are chosen to control the extent of diffusion of the fine particles into the surface of the base material.


Example 9

An alternative approach is to pre-lithiate and calcine the base and fine particles separately at a lower temperature 500-900° C. before blending, and then heat-treating the fine particles with the base material at higher temperatures (900-1100° C.) to bond them together and allow interdiffusion of elements. Other blending and calcination approaches can be conceived to achieve the same results as described here.


Example 10

An alternative approach is to coprecipitate, lithiate, and calcine the base particles as in Example 8. Then a solution of acetates and/or nitrates containing LiCo(MnxNiyAlz)O was prepared and mixed with the base particles to form an incipient wet mixture. The mixture was dried and then calcined between 600-900° C. FIG. 25 is a flow chart of the various compositions and process parameters.


Example 11

An alternative approach to produce the precursor of the inventive material is to carry out the coprecipitation process for the base particles as described in Example 6. Then, as the particles have grown and densified to their near-optimum properties, the process is contained as a batch process, and the metal-ion feedstock solution is changed to produce the energy-retentive composition defined in equation: LiαCo1-x-y-z(MnxNiyAlz)Oσ, wherein 0<y≤x≤0.2, 0.98≤α≤1.02, 1.99≤δ≤2.01. The coprecipitation process then continues until the hydroxide precursor particles have been overlaid with the desired fraction of the new composition. These precursor particles are washed, dried and calcined with lithium salts as described earlier to produce a finished cathode powder.


Example 12: NM1616 Coating on LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 Core

Coin cells were made from the electrode material described in Example 7, using a Li disk anode (½ cell) to demonstrate the effects of the inventive modification. Three cells are compared in FIG. 6 for their discharge capacity. The 3% Mn baseline has a composition: (as determined by high precision ICP-OES); the 2 wt % NM1616 (referring to a lithiated 2 wt % overlay containing a nominal 16 mol % Mn, 16 mol % Ni, and balance Co, or resulting in an overall composition of the base and the overlay: and the 5 wt % NM1616 (referring to a lithiated 5 wt % overlay containing a nominal 16 mol % Mn, 16 mol % Ni, and balance Co, or results in an overall composition of the base and the overlay. All of the materials are coated with 0.05 wt % Al2O3 using a wet impregnation process of Al-nitrate salts, dried and calcined at 500° C. in air. The 3% Mn baseline starts out with a discharge capacity of 184 mAh/g, while the 2 wt % NM1616 overlaid material has a lower capacity of 182 mAh/g, however, the overlaid material shows better capacity retention over 25 cycles. The 5 wt % NM1616 has a lower capacity of 179 mAh/g, yet also shows better capacity retention than the baseline.


It is determined that during processing, the overlaid materials maintain a certain amount of separation of the overlay from the base material; i.e., the elements of the overlay have not completely distributed into the base, but have a surface that is enriched with the initial composition of the overlay material.


Further evidence of improved energy retention is shown in FIG. 27. The normalized energy retention is improved by overlaying increasing amounts of NM1616 on the 3% Mn baseline material. This improvement is also seen in the average discharge voltage (FIG. 28). The best voltage retention is seen for the 5 wt % NM1616 overlaid material.


The benefits gained from an increased amount of overlay on the base material are offset by a reduction in capacity with increased NM1616 as shown in FIG. 26. Considering the capacity and voltage retention, the best overlay composition is between 2 and 5 wt % NM1616.


The NM1616 composition was chosen for its excellent energy retention, however, there are other compositions of Mn and Ni substituted LiCoO2 that may also provide good energy retention while maintaining high energy density. Additionally, 3% Mn was chosen as the base composition because of its high energy density and retention. Other compositions including variable Al and Mn additions can further improve energy density and retention.


Example 13

The assumption that the NM1616 overlay does remain near the surface of the particle after high temperature processing is substantiated by Raman microspectroscopy. This surface-sensitive technique shows the effect of Li, Mn and Ni additions. In FIG. 29, a comparison is made between baseline 4% Mn (M4) with 2 wt % and 5 wt % NM1616 overlays and pure NM1616 powder. The Raman spectrum for NM1616 shows an upward shift in the major peak compared to M4 and 2 wt % and 5 wt % NM1616; and the ‘knee’ between 620-680 cm-1 has greater intensity and has narrowed for NM1616. The 2 wt % and 5 wt % MN overlays show spectra that lie in between the M4 and NM1616. The knee size and shape is determined by the amount of Ni, Mn, and Li content in the compound. As such, this figure illustrates that the surfaces of both 2 wt % and 5 wt % show similar surface behavior to pure NM1616.


Example 14

The thermal stability of a baseline material containing 4% Mn is improved with the addition of Mn to LiCo02. Stability is sacrificed slightly when 4% Mn is overlaid with NM1616. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is used to demonstrate thermal stability of lithium ion materials. Electrodes from each material were first cycled between 2.75-4.6V vs. Li with 0.1 C and then charged to 4.6V and held at this voltage for 5 hours, before disassembling. The cycled electrodes were harvested from the coin cells and then washed with Dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and dried in the glove box. The harvested electrodes were sealed in the stainless steel high pressure capsules with electrolyte [1.2 M LiPF6+EC:EMC (3:7 by weight)]. The sealed high pressure capsules were heated from 30-400° C. with 10° C./min then cooled down to 30° C. FIG. 10 shows DSC test results of LiCoO2, (4% Mn base), and (4% Mn overlaid with NM1616). The onset temperature and the heat release for charged LiCo02 are 190° C. and 0.54 J/g, respectively. While the onset temperature for the charged (4% Mn base) has improved to 247° C. and the heat release has reduced to 0.28 J/g. The thermal stability of the (4% Mn overlaid with NM1616) is slightly less stable compared to the 4% Mn base having an onset temperature of 240° C. and heat release of 0.37 J/g; but maintains a better thermal stability than LiCo02.


During heating, the charged cathode goes through a phase transition that releases oxygen, which reacts exothermically with the electrolyte solvent resulting in a heat release. Manganese is considered to increase thermal stability. Addition of Mn stabilizes the structure of charged and delays the structural change during heating. Co-addition of Ni will reduce the thermal stability of charged which is caused by the largest and fastest reduction of Ni4+ to Ni2+. (Seong-Min Bak, et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 22594-22601) However, well-balanced Co, Ni and Mn ratios can also achieve good thermal stability.


The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the described embodiments. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the described embodiments. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of the specific embodiments described herein are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the precise forms disclosed. It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings.

Claims
  • 1. A compound represented by Formula (II): LiaCo(1-2y)(M/M2)yOδ  Formula (II)wherein M1 is Ni;wherein M2 is Ti;wherein M1M2 represents metal pairs of M1 and M2; andwherein 0<y≤0.4, 0.95≤α≤1.4, and 1.90≤δ≤2.10.
  • 2. The compound of claim 1, wherein 0<y≤0.25.
  • 3. The compound of claim 1, wherein 0.02≤y≤0.06.
  • 4. The compound of claim 1, wherein 0.05≤y≤0.09.
  • 5. The compound of claim 1, wherein 0.08≤y≤0.12.
  • 6. The compound of claim 1, wherein 0.14≤y≤0.18.
  • 7. The compound of claim 1, wherein 0.20≤y≤0.25.
  • 8. A cathode active material comprising the compound of claim 1.
  • 9. A cathode comprising a cathode current collector and the cathode active material according to claim 8 disposed over the cathode current collector.
  • 10. A battery cell comprising: an anode comprising an anode current collector and an anode active material disposed over the anode current collector andthe cathode of claim 9.
  • 11. A portable electronic device comprising: the battery cell of claim 10.
PRIORITY

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/710,540, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 10,597,307, entitled “SURFACE STABILIZED CATHODE ACTIVE FOR LITHIUM ION BATTERIES AND SYNTHESIZING METHOD OF THE SAME,” filed on Sep. 20, 2017, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/397,725, entitled “High Energy and Stability from Nickel-Manganese Pairs in Lithium Cobalt Oxide”, filed on Sep. 21, 2016, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/397,730, entitled “Surface Stabilized Cathode Material for Lithium Ion Batteries”, filed on Sep. 21, 2016, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/524,864, entitled “Surface Stabilized Cathode Material for Lithium Ion Batteries and Synthesizing Method of the Same”, filed on Jun. 26, 2017, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

U.S. GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS

This invention was made with U.S. government support under WFO Proposal No. 85F59. This invention was made under a CRADA 1500801 between Apple Inc. and Argonne National Laboratory operated for the United States Department of Energy. The U.S. government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (193)
Number Name Date Kind
5744262 Cheng et al. Apr 1998 A
5993998 Yasuda Nov 1999 A
6007947 Mayer Dec 1999 A
6077496 Hiraoka et al. Jun 2000 A
6677082 Thackeray et al. Jan 2004 B2
6680143 Thackeray et al. Jan 2004 B2
6878487 Cho et al. Apr 2005 B2
7135252 Thackeray et al. Nov 2006 B2
7205072 Kang et al. Apr 2007 B2
7235193 Park et al. Jun 2007 B2
7238450 Howard, Jr. et al. Jun 2007 B2
7314682 Thackeray et al. Jan 2008 B2
7314684 Kang et al. Jan 2008 B2
7435402 Kang et al. Oct 2008 B2
7468223 Thackeray et al. Dec 2008 B2
7655361 Kim et al. Feb 2010 B2
7691535 Shiozaki et al. Apr 2010 B2
7732096 Thackeray et al. Jun 2010 B2
7754384 Patoux et al. Jul 2010 B2
7897674 Zaghib Mar 2011 B2
7923149 Hwang et al. Apr 2011 B2
8148011 Thackeray et al. Jan 2012 B2
8187746 Chen et al. May 2012 B2
8206852 Chang et al. Jun 2012 B2
8277683 Deng et al. Oct 2012 B2
8337727 Chen et al. Dec 2012 B2
8343663 Jung et al. Jan 2013 B2
8383077 Thackeray et al. Feb 2013 B2
8535832 Karthikeyan et al. Sep 2013 B2
8801960 Ueda et al. Aug 2014 B2
8802290 Li et al. Aug 2014 B2
9166222 Amiruddin et al. Oct 2015 B2
9716265 Dai et al. Jul 2017 B2
9843041 Lopez et al. Dec 2017 B2
10084187 Dai et al. Sep 2018 B2
10128494 Dai et al. Nov 2018 B2
10141572 Wu et al. Nov 2018 B2
10164256 Wu et al. Dec 2018 B2
10297821 Dai et al. May 2019 B2
10297823 Dai et al. May 2019 B2
10347909 Dai et al. Jul 2019 B2
10593941 Dai et al. Mar 2020 B2
10597307 Dai Mar 2020 B2
10615413 Dai et al. Apr 2020 B2
20020061444 Kweon et al. May 2002 A1
20020114995 Thackery Aug 2002 A1
20020136954 Thackery Sep 2002 A1
20020182504 Imachi et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030013017 Nagayama et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030039886 Zhang et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030073002 Imachi et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030082445 Smieth et al. May 2003 A1
20030134200 Tanaka et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040029008 Winterberg Feb 2004 A1
20040191633 Johnson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040258836 Besenhard et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050026040 Thackery Mar 2005 A1
20050074675 Nishijima et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050130042 Liu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136329 Howard, Jr. et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050181279 Hosoya Aug 2005 A1
20050265909 Kajiya et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050271948 Kang Dec 2005 A1
20060024584 Kim et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060068293 Kim et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060081818 Ito et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060088767 Li et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060099508 Thackeray et al. May 2006 A1
20060159994 Dahn et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060177739 Endo et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060194118 Yew et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060240326 Lee Oct 2006 A1
20070048619 Inda Mar 2007 A1
20070141469 Tokunaga et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070172739 Visco Jul 2007 A1
20070202407 Eberman et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070264573 Yamada et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070292761 Park et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080057401 Mori et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080090150 Nakura Apr 2008 A1
20080118836 Hwang et al. May 2008 A1
20080118847 Jung et al. May 2008 A1
20080131778 Watanabe et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080131781 Yong et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080160415 Wakita et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080268339 Suzuki Oct 2008 A1
20080280205 Jiang et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080311473 Sasaoka et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080318131 Watanabe et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090092903 Johnson et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090146115 Xiao et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090200510 Watanabe et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090202905 Morita et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090239148 Jiang Sep 2009 A1
20100055567 Nakai et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100086853 Venkatachalam et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100086854 Kumar et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100151332 Lopez et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100173197 Li et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100304225 Pascaly et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110014518 Nakai et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110017529 Kumar et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110031437 Nagase et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110052981 Lopez et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110053001 Babic et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110065006 Ogasa Mar 2011 A1
20110076556 Karthikeyan et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110076564 Yu et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110081578 Chang et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110089369 Patoux et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110111294 Lopez et al. May 2011 A1
20110111298 Lopez et al. May 2011 A1
20110121240 Amine et al. May 2011 A1
20110136019 Amiruddin et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110143174 Kim Jun 2011 A1
20110165463 Chang et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110165474 Im et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110171371 Li et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110171539 Patoux et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110200864 Dai Aug 2011 A1
20110200880 Yu Aug 2011 A1
20110223492 Sakitani et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110244331 Karthikeyan et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110294006 Amine et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110294019 Amine et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120015240 Teng et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120015250 Teng et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120028134 Kim et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120040247 Manivannan et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120168696 Huang et al. May 2012 A1
20120196176 He et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120282522 Axelbaum et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120295155 Deng et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130004826 Li et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130011738 Zhou Jan 2013 A1
20130101893 Dai et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130149604 Fujiki et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130252107 Lee et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130260249 Choi Oct 2013 A1
20130344391 Yushin et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140087065 Li et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140087254 Li et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140087256 Li et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140087261 Li et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140141331 Lee et al. May 2014 A1
20140158932 Sun et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140175329 Palma et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140193693 Hoshina et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140234715 Fasching et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140272563 Dai et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150140421 Ihara et al. May 2015 A1
20150171423 Kim et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150180024 Nose Jun 2015 A1
20150243971 Cho et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150243984 Kase et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150303519 Hanazaki Oct 2015 A1
20150311522 Fang et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160036043 Dai et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160133929 Hah et al. May 2016 A1
20160156032 Lee et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160260965 Wu et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160293941 Yamasaki et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160315315 Olken et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160351973 Albano et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170092949 Dai et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170133678 Ozoemena et al. May 2017 A1
20170187071 Wang et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170187072 Wang et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170214045 Dai et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170263917 Dai et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170263928 Dai et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170263929 Wu et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170279162 Vissers et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170346082 Dai et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180062156 Wu et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180083277 Dai et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180083278 Dai et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180114983 Dai et al. Apr 2018 A9
20180114984 Wu et al. Apr 2018 A9
20180123117 Dai et al. May 2018 A9
20180215629 Honma et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180257947 Dai et al. Sep 2018 A9
20180294522 Dai et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180331360 Meng et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180351173 Dai et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190027747 Dai et al. Jan 2019 A9
20190067686 Dai et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190074514 Wu et al. Mar 2019 A1
20200044242 Wang et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200058933 Wu et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200075951 Dai et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200259208 Yamamoto Aug 2020 A1
20200266435 Dai et al. Aug 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (90)
Number Date Country
1588675 Mar 2005 CN
1702891 Nov 2005 CN
1770514 Oct 2006 CN
101083321 Dec 2007 CN
101088918 Dec 2007 CN
101150190 Mar 2008 CN
101223660 Jul 2008 CN
101284681 Oct 2008 CN
101304090 Nov 2008 CN
101510603 Aug 2009 CN
101694877 Apr 2010 CN
101734728 Jun 2010 CN
102110808 Jun 2011 CN
102195094 Sep 2011 CN
102299299 Dec 2011 CN
102332585 Jan 2012 CN
102368548 Mar 2012 CN
101789499 Apr 2012 CN
102439765 May 2012 CN
102479947 May 2012 CN
102484249 May 2012 CN
102544575 Jul 2012 CN
102646831 Aug 2012 CN
102683666 Sep 2012 CN
102723459 Oct 2012 CN
102751481 Oct 2012 CN
102881891 Jan 2013 CN
103151520 Jun 2013 CN
103296249 Sep 2013 CN
102386381 Jan 2014 CN
103560250 Feb 2014 CN
103606674 Feb 2014 CN
103682311 Mar 2014 CN
103872302 Jun 2014 CN
103872315 Jun 2014 CN
103972493 Aug 2014 CN
104022280 Sep 2014 CN
104201323 Dec 2014 CN
104300138 Jan 2015 CN
104466099 Mar 2015 CN
104577128 Apr 2015 CN
104868122 Aug 2015 CN
105161710 Dec 2015 CN
105895909 Aug 2016 CN
106450211 Feb 2017 CN
10352063 Jun 2005 DE
4-267053 Sep 1992 JP
H-10-087327 Apr 1998 JP
2001-167763 Jun 2001 JP
2001-319652 Nov 2001 JP
2002-201028 Jul 2002 JP
2004-047180 Feb 2004 JP
2005-101003 Apr 2005 JP
2005-149867 Jun 2005 JP
2005-289700 Oct 2005 JP
2006-344509 Dec 2006 JP
2007-091502 Apr 2007 JP
2007-517368 Jun 2007 JP
2007-173113 Jul 2007 JP
2009-4311 Jan 2009 JP
2009-217981 Sep 2009 JP
2010-541166 Dec 2010 JP
2011-105594 Jun 2011 JP
2011-113869 Jun 2011 JP
2013-180917 Sep 2013 JP
2015-213038 Nov 2015 JP
2016-517615 Jun 2016 JP
2017-191738 Oct 2017 JP
10-2002-0063501 Aug 2002 KR
10-2005-0121727 Dec 2005 KR
10-2014-0073856 Jun 2014 KR
10-2014-0108615 Sep 2014 KR
101731473 Apr 2017 KR
201126798 Aug 2011 TW
201342695 Oct 2013 TW
WO 2003049216 Jun 2003 WO
WO 2003081698 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2004045015 May 2004 WO
WO 2004102700 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2004107480 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2008069351 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2009120515 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2010011569 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010139404 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2011020073 Feb 2011 WO
WO 2011054441 May 2011 WO
WO 2013048048 Apr 2013 WO
WO 2014014913 Jan 2014 WO
WO 2014119165 Aug 2014 WO
WO 2016143572 Sep 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (80)
Entry
Yuping et al.; “Lithium Ion Batteries—Applications and Practices”; Chapter 5 Cobalt Lithium Oxide Cathode Materials; Chemical Industry Press; Jan. 2012; 4 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/679,911, filed Nov. 11, 2020, Dai et al.
Amiruddin et al.; “Electrochemical Characterization of Cathode Material (Li[Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1]O2 as Core and Li[Ni0.5-0.5xCoxMn0.5-0.5x]O2 as shell)for Lithium-Ion Batteries”; ECS Meeting Abstracts; Electrochemical Society; No. 240; 2007; one page.
Levasseur et al., “Evidence for structural defects in on-stoichiometric HT-LiCoO2: electrochemical, electronic properties and 7LI NMR studies,” Solid State Ionics, 128 (2000), pp. 11-24.
Zhao et al., “Progress of Research on the Li-rich Cathode Materials xLI2MnO3(1-x)LIMO2(M+Co, Fe, Ni1/2Mn1/2 . . . ) for Li-ion Batteries,” Journal of Inorganic Materials, vol. 26(7), pp. 673-679, Jul. 2011.
Lee et al., “Characteristics of LiCoO2 and Its Precursor Synthesized by a Uniform Precipitation Method,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2010, vol. 13, No. 7, pp. A81-A84.
Kobayashi et al., “Study on the Crystal and Electronic Structures of the Layered Li2Mo3-LiMo2 Materials in Li De-Intercalation Process,” Photon Factory Activity Report, 2012, vol. 29, No. 2011, 1 pp.
Giordano et al., “Metal Nitride and Metal Carbide Nanoparticles by a Soft Urea Pathway,” Chem. Mater., 2009, vol. 21, pp. 5136-5144.
Dou et al., “Synthesis and electrochemical properties of layered LiNi0.5-xMn0.5-xCo2xO2 for lithium-ion battery from nickel manganese cobalt precursor,” J Solid State Electrochem, (2011), vol. 15, pp. 399-404.
Li, “Layered Oxides Li1+xM1-xO2 (M= Ni, Mn, Co, Al) as Cathode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Ion Batteries,” Dissertation, Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Materials Science and Engineering in the Graduate School of Binghamton University State University of New York, Jul. 22, 2011, Published by UMI Dissertation Publishing, UMI No. 3474185, 158 pages.
Hu et al., “Ni, Mn-Co doped High-Voltage LiCoO2 Cathode Material for Lithium Ion Batteries,” Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2015, vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 159-165.
Rodrigues et al., “A novel coprecipitation method towards the synthesis of NiXMnXCo(1-2X)(OH)2 for the preparation of lithium metal oxides,” J Solid State Electrochem, 2012, vol. 16, pp. 1121-1132.
Cho et al., “LICoO2 Cathode Material That Does Not Show a Phase Transition from Hexagonal to Monoclinic Phase,” 2001, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 148, No. 10, pp. A1110-A1115.
Jung et al., “Enhanced Stability of LiCoO2 Cathodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Surface Modification by Atomic Layer Deposition,” 2010, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 157, No. 1, pp. A75-A81.
Koyama et al., “First principles study of dopant solubility and defect chemistry in Li CoO2,” J. Mater. Chem A., 2014, vol. 2, pp. 11235-11245.
Arunkumar et al., “Chemical and structural instability of the chemically delithiated (1-z) Li[Li1/3Mn2/3O2 (z) Li[Co1-yNiy]O2 (O ≤ y ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ z ≤ 1) solid solution cathodes,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2008, vol. 18, pp. 190-198.
Sun et al., “The Role of AIF3 Coatings in Improving Electrochemical Cycling of Li-Enriched Nickel-Manganese Oxide Electrodes for Li-Ion Batteries,” Adv. Mater., 2012, vol. 24, pp. 1192-1196.
Robertson et al., “Layered LixMn1-yCoyO2 Intercalation Electrodes—Influence of Ion Exchange on Capacity and Structure upon Cycling,” Chem. Mater., 2001, vol. 13, pp. 2380-2386.
Patoux et al., “Layered Manganese Oxide Intergrowth Electrodes for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. 2. Substitution with Al,” Chem. Mater., 2005, vol. 17, pp. 1044-1054.
Myung et al., “Role of Alumina Coating on Li-Ni-Co-Mn-O Particles as Positive Electrode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries,” Chem. Mater., 2005, vol. 17, pp. 3695-3704.
Wang et al., “Synthesis of Li2MnO3—stabilized LiCoO2 cathode material by spray-drying method and its high voltage performance,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2015, vol. 626, pp. 228-233.
Zeng et al., “Cation ordering in Li[NixMnxCo(1-2x)]O-2-layered cathode materials: A nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), pair distribution function, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and electrochemical study,” Chemistry of Materials, 2007, vol. 19. No. 25, pp. 6277-6289.
Zeng et al., “Investigation of the Structural Changes in Li[NiyMnyCo(1-2y]O-2 (y=0.05) upon Electrochemical Lithium Deintercalation,” Chemistry of Materials, 2010, vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 1209-1219.
Saadoune et al., “LiNi0.1Mn0.1Co0.8O2 electrode material: Structural changes upon lithium electrochemical extraction,” Electrochimica Acta, 2010, vol. 55, No. 18, pp. 5180-5185.
Bentaleb et al., “On the LiNi0.2Mn0.2Co0.6O2 positive electrode material,” Journal of Power Sources, 2010, vol. 195, No. 5, pp. 1510-1515.
Ben Kamel et al., “Local Structure and electrochemistry of LiNiyMnyCo1-2y)O2 electrode materials for Li-ion batteries,” Ionics, 2008, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 89-97.
Stoyanova et al., “High-Frequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Analysis of the Oxidation State and Local Structure of Ni and Mn Ions in Ni, Mn-Codoped LiCoO2,” Inorganic Chemistry, 2010, vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 1932-1941.
Menetrier et al., “The insulator-metal transition upon lithium deintercalation from LiCoO2: electronic properties and Li-7 NMR Study,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, 1999, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 1135-1140.
Iddir et al., “Stability of Li- and Mn-Rich Layered-Oxide Cathodes within the First-Charge Voltage Plateau,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2016, vol. 163, No. 8, pp. A1784-A1789.
Seong-Min Bak et al, “Structural Changes and Thermal Stability of Charged LiNixMnyCozO2 Cathode Materials Studied by Combined In Situ Time-Resolved XRD and Mass Spectroscopy,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, vol. 6, pp. 22594-22601.
Nam et al. “Ammonia-free coprecipitation synthesis of a Ni-Co-Mn hydroxide precursor for high-performance battery cathode materials,” Green Chemistry, 2015. vol. 17, pp. 1127.
Xie et al., “An improved continuous co-precipitation method to synthesize LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode material,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, vol. 666, pp. 84-87.
Rouse et al., “Electrochemical Studies of Single Crystals of Lithiated Nickel Oxide,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Feb. 1966, vol. 113, No. 2, pp. 184-190.
Jin et al., “Observation of Bulk Superconductivity in NaxCoO2 ⋅yH2O and NaxCoO2⋅yD2O Powder and Single Crystals,” Phys Rev Lett, 2008, vol. 91, Issue 21, id. 217001, 4 pages.
Franger et al., “Chemistry and Electrochemistry of Low-Temperature Manganese Oxides as Lithium Intercalation Compounds,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2000, vol. 147, No. 9, pp. 3226-3230.
Lu et al., “Layered Li[NixCo1-2xMnx]O2 Cathode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2001, vol. 4, No. 12, pp. A200-A203.
Shinova et al., “Cationic distribution and electrochemical performance of LiCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2 electrodes for lithium-ion batteries,” 2008, Solid State Ionics, vol. 179, pp. 2198-2208.
Qian et al., “Lithium Lanthanum Titanium Oxides: A Fast Ionic Conductive Coating for Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes,” Chemistry of Materials, 2012, 24 (14), pp. 2744-2751.
Reddy et al., “Effects of LLTO coating on high temperature cycle life performance of LiMn2O4 cathode material,” Abstract #382, 2012, The Electrochemical Society, 2 pages.
Davison et al., “Low Cost, Novel Methods for Fabricating All-Solid-State Lithium Ion Batteries,” A Major Qualifying Project Submitted to the Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Apr. 23, 2012, 126 pages.
Lee et al., “The Effects of Li-La-Ti-O Coating on the Properties of Li[Ni0.3Co0.4Mn0.3]O2 Cathode Material,” Journal of the Korean Institute of Electrical and Electronic Material Engineers, Oct. 2009, vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 890-896.
Lee et al., “The Effect of Coating Thickness on the Electrochemical Properties of a Li-La-Ti-O-coated Li[Ni0.3Co0.4Mn0.3]O2 Cathode,” Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2010, vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 3233-3237.
Hu et al., “Enhanced electrochemical performance of LiMn2O4 cathode with a Li0.34La0.51TiO3-caoted layer,” RSC Advances, 2015. vol. 5, pp. 17592-17600.
Fergus et al., “Recent Developments in Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, Vo. 195, No. 4, 23010, pp. 939-954.
Gille G. et al., “Cathode Materials for Rechargeable Batteries-Preparation, Structure-Property Relationships and Performance,” Solid State Ionics, Vo. 148, No. 3-4, 2002, pp. 269-282.
Periasamy et al., “High Voltage and High Capacity Characteristics of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 Cathodes for Lithium Battery Applications,” Int. J. Electrochem Soc., vol. 2, 2007, pp. 689-699.
Manthiram Lab Highlights, “Passivation of Spinel Cathode Surface through Self-Segregarion of Iron,” May 7, 2010.
Cerion Power, “Our Power Business,” www.cerionenterprises.com/companies_and_applications/power, accessed Sep. 8, 2011.
ETV Motors, “High5ive advanced high-voltage cells,” www.etvemotors.com/advanced-battery.htm, accessed Sep. 8, 2011.
Wolfenstine et al., US Army RDECOM, “High Cycle Life Cathode for High Voltage (5V) Lithium Ion Batteries.”.
Sullivan, “Safe High Voltage Cathode Materials for Pulsed Power Applications,” Navy STTR FY2011A—Topic N11A-T035, www.navy.sbir.com/n11_A/navst11-035.htm, accessed Sep. 8, 2011.
Xu, US Army RDECOM, “Electrolyte for Next Generation 5V Li-Ion Batteries.”.
Ghosh et al., “Block Copolymer Solid Battery Electrolyte with High Li-Ion Transference Number,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2010, vol. 157, No. 7, pp. A846-A849.
Abu-Lebdeh et al., High-Voltage Electrolytes Based on Adiponitrile for Li-Ion Batteries, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2009, vol. 156, No. 1, pp. A60-A65.
Jow et al., “High Voltage Electrolytes for Li-ion Batteries,” U.S. Research Laboratory, Presentation, May 2011.
Lucht, University of Rhode Island, “Development of Electrolytes for Lithium-ion Batteries,” Presentation, May 11, 2001.
Zhang et al, Argonne National Laboratory, Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, “High Voltage Electrolyte for Lithium Batteries,” Presentation, Jun. 9-13, 2011.
David Howell, US Department of Energy, “Vehicle Technologies Program,” 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, Presentation, May 9-13, 2011.
Fey et al., Preparation and electrochemical properties of high-voltage cathode maters, LiMyNi0.5-yMn1.5O4 (M= Fe, Cu, Al, Mg; y= 0.0-0.4), Journal of Power Sources, 2003, vol. 115, pp. 332-345.
Kawai et al., “High-voltage lithium cathode materials,” Journal of Power Sources, 1999, vols. 81-82, abstract only.
Huang et al., “Lithium cobalt phosphate: a high voltage lithium ion cathode material,” Valence Technologies.
“Award Details,” SBIR/STTR, www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/233700, accessed Sep. 8, 2011.
Ju et al., “LiCo1-xAlxO2 (0≤×≤0.05) cathode powders prepared from the nanosized Co1-xAlxOy precursor powders,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, 112 (2008), pp. 536-541.
Wu et al., “Effect of Al3+ and F-Doping on the Irreversible Oxygen Loss from Layered Li[Li0.17Mn0.58Ni0.25]O2 Cathodes,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2007, vol. 10, No. 6, pp. A151-A154.
Li et al., “Effects of fluorine doping on structure, surface chemistry, and electrochemical performance of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.0502,” Electrochimica Acta, 2015, vol. 174, pp. 1122-1130.
Cho et al., “Exploring Lithium Deficiency in Layered Oxide Cathode for Li-Ion Battery,” Advanced Sustainable Systems, 2017, 1700026, 10 pages.
Lee et al., “Surface modification of LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 cathodes with ZnAl2O4 by a sol-gel method for lithium ion batteries,” Electrochimica Acta, 2014, vol. 115, pp. 326-331.
Kim et al., “Effect of fluorine on Li[Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3]O2-zFz as lithium intercalation material,” Journal of Power Sources, 2005, vol. 146, pp. 602-605.
Yue et al., “The enhanced electrochemical performance of LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 cathode materials by low temperature fluorine substitution,” Electrochimica Acta, 2013, vol. 95, pp. 112-118.
Wang et al., “Effect of surface fluorine substitution on high voltage electrochemical performances of layered LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode materials,” Applied Surface Science, 2016, vol. 371, pp. 172-179.
Tang et al., “Synthesis and characterization of LiFePO4 coating with aluminum doped zinc oxide,” Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2013, vol. 23, pp. 451-455.
Myung et al., “Functionality of Oxide Coating for Li[Li0.05Ni0.4Co0.15Mn0.4])2 as Positive Electrode Materials for Lithium-Ion Secondary Batteries,” J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, vol. 111, pp. 4061-4067.
Liu et al., “Investigation the electrochemical performance of Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2 cathode material with ZnAl2O4 coating for lithium ion batteries,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, vol. 685, pp. 523-532.
Kim et al., “Improvement of High-Voltage Cycling Behavior of Surface-Modified Li[Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3]O2 Cathodes by Fluorine Substitution for Li-Ion Batteries,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, vol. 152, issue 9, pp. A1707-A1713.
Choi et al., “27 Al NMR Chemical Shifts in Oxide Crystals: A First-Principles Study,” J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113 (9), pp. 3869-3873.
Lee et al., “Solid-state NMR Studies of Al-doped and Al2O3-coated LICoO2,” Electrochimica Acta, Nov. 30, 2004, vol. 50, Issues 2-3, pp. 491-494.
Han et al., “Understanding the Role of Temperature and Cathode Composition on Interface and Bulk: Optimizing Aluminum Oxide Coatings for Li-Ion Cathodes,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9 (17), pp. 14769-14778.
Chen et al., “Role of surface coating on cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2010, 20, 7606-7612.
Wenbin, Luo, “Effect of Al, Mg and Mn-Mg Doping on the Structure, Electrochemistry and Thermal Stability of LiCoO2 and LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2,” China Doctoral Dissertations Full-text Database Engineering Technology Part II, Nov. 15, 2010. (Translation provided by MultiLing).
Xinran, Cui, “Preparation and Properties of Al(3+) Doped Lithium-rich Layered Cathode Material Li[Co0.3Li0.23Mn0.47]O2,” China Doctoral Dissertations Full-text Database Engineering Technology Part II, Oct. 15, 2012. (Translation provided by MultiLing).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200189930 A1 Jun 2020 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
62524864 Jun 2017 US
62397730 Sep 2016 US
62397725 Sep 2016 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15710540 Sep 2017 US
Child 16802347 US