The present invention relates to a surface-treatment wheel. More particularly this invention concerns such a wheel having a plurality of radially projecting solid teeth.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,309,292 a surface-treatment wheel is described intended mainly for use stripping adhesive residue and foil off a lacquered metal surface. It is adapted to be rotated about an axis and has an outer ring unitarily formed of plastic or rubber with an array of identical radially outwardly projecting teeth that can be elastically deformed. This ring is carried on a hub that is fixed to the arbor of a drive unit, for instance a hand-held pneumatic drive, so that a user can press the rotating wheel against a surface to be cleaned and the teeth will rub off any foreign matter on the surface.
In the known system there is a tradeoff between operating speed and efficiency on the one side and tool life on the other. The higher the operating speed, the more efficiently the tool removes material from the surface being cleaned or buffed, but the more likely the teeth are to be abraded or even broken off.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an improved surface-treatment wheel.
Another object is the provision of such an improved surface-treatment wheel that overcomes the above-given disadvantages, in particular that can be operated at high speed without damage to its teeth.
A surface-treatment wheel has according to the invention an inner element rotatable about an axis, and an outer ring fixed rotationally on the inner element, centered on the axis, and formed unitarily with an annular array of radially outwardly projecting teeth defining outwardly open notches, and respective angularly extending webs or ridges in the notches.
With the structure of this invention the length of the lever arms formed by the processing teeth is considerably reduced, so that breakage of the processing teeth is surprisingly prevented even if the width of the stabilizing webs is less than the width of the processing teeth. Added to this is the fact that the wear is in this way substantially reduced, and, even taking account of an increase in wear, the outer rim will run true and consequently the toothed rim with the processing teeth is optimized. This applies even in the case of unskilled or improper handling at high rotation speeds. This results in increased service life and erasing or cleaning capacity, without the risk of damage to the surfaces which are being treated.
According to the invention the teeth are substantially identical and have a predetermined radial height and a predetermined axial thickness. The ridges all are substantially identical and have a predetermined radial height shorter than that of the teeth and a predetermined axial thickness shorter than that of the teeth. Thus the teeth will extend axially in both directions and radially outward past the ridges.
These ridges are axially centered in the respective notches. The ridge height is equal to about two-thirds of the tooth height. This tooth height is equal to between 7 mm and 9 mm. The tooth thickness is equal to between one-fifth and two-fifths of the tooth thickness. Thus the ridges normally will not themselves ever touch the workpiece being treated.
The teeth in accordance with the invention have angularly directed planar flank faces defining the notches and the ridges are unitarily joined to the respective teeth at the faces thereof. These flanks extend at an acute angle of about 40° to each other, making the notches V-shaped. This ensures that the ridges or webs stabilize the teeth without interfering with how they function.
The above and other objects, features, and advantages will become more readily apparent from the following description, reference being made to the accompanying drawing in which:
As seen in
The outer ring 2 is formed unitarily of one piece with an array of radially outwardly projecting teeth 4 extending as shown in
The ridges or webs 6 each have a radial height H in the respective notch 8 equal to about ⅔ of a height h of the teeth 4 and an axial thickness B equal to between ⅕ and ⅖ an axial thickness b of the ring 2. Here the height H is equal to 20 mm and the height h to 30 mm. The thickness B is equal to between 7 mm and 9 mm, preferably 8 mm, while the thickness b is equal to 30 mm.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 049 235 | Oct 2004 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1156166 | Meyers | Oct 1915 | A |
3122030 | Metzger | Feb 1964 | A |
3517463 | Niemiec | Jun 1970 | A |
3763601 | Schwarzkopf et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
D266001 | Wertheimer | Aug 1982 | S |
4462382 | Baron et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4550708 | Roemmele et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
5507273 | Chiuminatta et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5787871 | Jones et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5871005 | Sueta | Feb 1999 | A |
6309292 | Montabaur | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6638153 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6845767 | Sakarcan | Jan 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060079163 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |