Surgery table apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9358170
  • Patent Number
    9,358,170
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 3, 2014
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 7, 2016
    9 years ago
Abstract
A surgery table utilizing first and second sections which are hingedly attached to one another. First and second sections are also connected to supports apart from the hinged portion. An elevator moves one of the sections upwardly and downwardly at the support. The resultant position of the frame formed by the first and second sections may take the configuration of a flat surface or an upwardly or downwardly oriented “vee”.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a novel and useful surgery table.


Surgery practices require the support of a patient on a surgery table and the adjustment of the patient's body by movements that include tilting, raising and lowering. Also articulation of the patient's body, generally around the waist portion may be necessary in certain instances. In the past, such movements have been achieved by the use of supports such as pillows and pads that are placed beneath and around the patient by surgical workers.


In addition, specialized motor-driven surgery tables have been devised to create a multiplicity of positions of a supporting surface to orient the patient resting atop the same. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,634,043 describes a medical table which includes a head portion and a pair of foot columns, all of which are extendable and retractable between upper and lower positions for maneuvering a patient to achieve proper support.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,152,261 describes a modular support system which is usable for surgery in which a pair of supports are independently operated adjacent one another to provide a plurality of support position for a patient.


A surgery table which allows the articulation of a pair of sections in order to position a patient for surgery in a safe and efficient manner would be a notable advance in the medical field.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention a novel and useful surgery table is herein provided.


The surgery of the present application includes a first section having a proximal end and a distal end. A second section is also included and possesses a proximal and distal end. The distal ends of the first and second sections are hingedly attached to one another to form a frame that supports a patient for carrying out surgical procedures.


A first support holds the proximal end of the first section. The first support also includes an elevator which allows the proximal end portion of the first section to move relative to the first support. A second support holds the proximal end of the second section and includes a pivot to allow the hinging of the first section relative to the second section upon movement of the elevator found in the first support.


A length compensation mechanism is also present in relation to the first section to provide an adjustment of the distance between the proximal portion of the first section relative to the first support. Such length compensation may take the form of a journaled shaft which is positioned intermediate the first section and the first support. Further, another hinge may lie between the journal and the first support to provide articulation as required.


An upper body support may also be formed on the frame formed by the first and second sections. Such upper body support may include a slidable platform which allows the gentle movement of the patient when the frame is hinged to form an angle between the first and second sections thereof. Such upper body support may take the form of a flattened member which is moved by a belt or a chain and sprocket mechanism.


Further, the surgery table of the present invention may include a roll drive which allows the tilting of the frame along an axis common to the first and second supports. Again, the roll drive permits the surgeon to perform medical procedures in a convenient and safe manner due to such positioning of the patient.


The frame, as well as the first and second supports, may be interlinked by a bar which provides stability and adjustability to the length of the surgery table. Wheels may also be provided on the first and second supports to allow the surgery table be easily moved from storage to an operating room and back again.


It may be apparent that a novel and useful surgery table has been hereinabove described.


It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a surgery table which is capable of positioning a patient for surgery procedures in a variety of positions.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table which is capable of positioning a patient for surgical procedures which eliminates frictional dragging of the patient relative to the surgery table.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table which is capable of positioning a patient in an angulated position in order to allow a surgeon to perform back surgery.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table which is capable of positioning a patient in a variety of surgical positions through a motorized mechanism, thus maximizing patient comfort and safety.


A further object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table which permits the use of X-ray devices during surgical procedures.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table which eliminates pinch points on the patient while the patient is being maneuvered into surgical positions.


A further object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table which is simple, compact, and easy to use during positioning of a patient for surgical procedures.


Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table which effects harmonious translation of the patient's torso during intraoperative spinal flexion and extension.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table that includes mechanisms to prevent distraction and compression of the spine of a patient when such patient is positioned for surgical procedures.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table which supports the natural biomechanics of the spine.


A further object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table that improves surgical access and visualization at a surgical site.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table that facilitates closure during lumbar osteotomy surgery.


Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table that employs a two-part hinged structure to enhance prone supine, and lateral procedures.


A further object of the present invention is to provide a surgery table that reduces renal caval compression and minimizes epidural venous bleeding.


The invention possesses other objects and advantages especially as concerns particular characteristics and features thereof which will become apparent as specification continues.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of the surgery table of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of the surgery table of the present invention angulated upwardly through its hinge mechanism to position a patient for back surgery.



FIG. 3 is a partial side elevational view of the hinged portion of the table of the present invention, reversed in placement from FIGS. 1 and 2.



FIG. 4 is a broken perspective view of the hinge adjustment mechanism of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a top, front, right perspective view of the slidable platform for supporting the torso or chest of a patient used with the hinged sections of the table of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is partial perspective view of the mechanism employed for sliding the torso platform of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a partial top plan view of the surgery table of the FIG. 1 showing the face pad, chest pad, hip pads, and arm rests, and slidable platform.



FIG. 8 is a schematic side elevational view of a portion of the surgery table of the present invention in which both sections are in the same plane.



FIG. 9 is a side elevational view of a portion of the surgery table showing upward articulation of the same through its hinge mechanism and the movement of the face and torso support during such articulation.





For a better understanding of the invention reference is made to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention which should be taken in conjunction with the above described drawings.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Various aspects of the present invention will evolve from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof which should be referenced to the prior described drawings.


An embodiment of the invention as a whole shown in the drawings by reference character 10. Table 10 includes as two of its elements a first section 12 and a second section 14. First section 12 includes a proximal portion 16 and a distal portion 18. Likewise, second section 14 is provided with a proximal portion 20 and a distal portion 22. Hinge 24 rotatably connects distal portion 18 of first section 12 to distal portion 22 of second section 14, FIG. 1. First section 12, second section 14, and hinge 24 form a frame 26 which is intended to support a patient during surgery.


Again referring to FIG. 1, it may be observed that a first support 28 holds proximal portion 16 of first section 12, while a second support 30 holds proximal portion 20 of second section 14. Adjustable rod member 32 further stabilizes the interconnection between first support 28 and second support 30. Plurality of wheels 34 allow surgery table 10 to roll on a surface 36. Such mobility is necessary for storage and use of surgery table 12. Of course, wheels 34 may be locked into place while surgery table is used for medical procedures.


Turning to FIG. 2, it may be seen that first section 12 has been rotated relative to second section 14, directional arrow 38. FIG. 1, depicts the up and down movement of distal ends 18 and 22 in phantom. During this operation, hinge 24 rotates about axis 40 and the proximal portion of second section 14 rotates about pivot 42. Additionally, an elevator 44 lowers the proximal portion 16 of first section 12. Adjustor 46, in the form of a journaled shaft, determines the distance between proximal portion 16 of first section 12 and support 28. Further, pivot 48 allows the rotation of a portion of adjustor 46 relative to elevator 44. Elevator 44 may be of known configuration, similar to one found in the Jackson surgery table distributed by Mizuho Orthopedic Systems Inc of Union City, Calif.


With respect to FIG. 7, it may be apparent that surgery table 10 includes a number of patient support items. For example, arm rests 50 and 52 extend to second section 14 for support therefrom. Face support 54 and chest support 56 lie on a platform 58 which slides along second section 14 of frame 26, the details of which will be discussed hereinafter. Hip supports 60 position atop first section 12. Other pads atop frame 26 have not been shown for the sake of clarity.


With reference to FIG. 3, it should be apparent that the hinged structure 24 of the table 10 is shown with portions of sections 12 and 14 shown on FIGS. 1 and 2. Hinge 24 is employed with a control rod 62 that is pivotally attached to tab 64 of first section 12 and to tab 66 of second section 14. When first and second sections 12 and 14 hinge downwardly, forming an upward vee, connection point 68 of control rod moves along arc 70 to a point 68A. At the same time, connection point 72 on the end of control rod at tab 64 moves to a point 72A. Likewise, when sections 12 and 14 hinge upwardly to form an upside down vee, connection point 68 moves along are 70 to a position identified as 68B, while position point 72 relative to section 12 moves to a point shown as 72B. Most importantly, the distances between points 68 and 72, 68A and 72A, and 68B and 72B remain the same, being identified as distance “A”, FIG. 3.


Referring now to FIG. 4, it may be observed that the drive mechanism 74 is revealed in broken away configuration for the movement of sections 12 and 14. In essence, a lead screw 76 is rotated via link rod 78 according to directional arrow 80. Motor 82 provides the motivational force for such movement in a clockwise or a counter clockwise direction of link rod and lead screw 76. As depicted in FIG. 4, lead screw 76 has been turned to move frame 26 upwardly into an inverted vee position.


Turning now to FIGS. 5 and 6, it may be apparent that chest or torso sliding platform 58 is depicted. Platform 58 includes a central portion 84 and upwardly extending arms 86 and 88. Central opening 90 lies below the face of a patient when platform 58 is placed atop frame 26, FIG. 7. Plate 92 aides in the mounting of platform 58 to frame 26. Lock fixture 94 stabilizes platform 58 atop of frame 26.



FIG. 6, depicts the sliding mechanism 96 which moves platform 58 commensurate with the hinging of sections of 14 and 12 heretofore described. A plate 98, connected to control rod 62, captures a timing belt 100 in conjunction with a link 102. Thus, the movement of control rod connection point 72, directional arrow 104, moves belt 100 according to directional arrow 106. Needless to say, drive plate 108 also moves according to directional arrow 106 and is connected to sliding platform 58 at arm 88 via drive pin 89. In other words, the movement of connection point 72 of control rod 62 in one direction causes the movement of sliding platform 58 in the opposite direction.


In operation, referencing FIGS. 7-9, platform 58 is placed upon frame 26 and allowed to slide thereupon when sections 12 and 14 move about hinge 24 and around axis 40. In addition, face support 54, usually constructed of soft foam material, is positioned on sliding platform 58 above opening 90 chest support 56. Hip supports 60 are also placed as shown in FIG. 7. In addition, other pads may lie atop of frame 26 which are not depicted in order to reveal the mechanical mechanism of table 10. With reference to FIG. 8, it may be observed that a patient 110 has been placed on table 10 in a prone position. Head 112 lies atop of face support 54 while the remaining portion of patients body 114 extends toward first section 12 of frame 26. As shown in FIG. 8, the patient is generally in a level position. The hinging or movement of section 14 relative to section 12, FIG. 9, causes the upward movement of frame 26 in the formation of a inverted vee which allows patient 110 to be position appropriately for the conducting of operation procedures such as back surgery and the like. It should also be noted that sliding platform 58 and face support 54 has moved according to directional arrow 116 toward hinge axis 40 to prevent the frictional dragging of patient 110 relative to table 10. It should also be realized that patient 110 may be placed on table 10 laterally, in a supine position and the like. Of course, the hinging of table 10 about axis 40 would be accomplished in conjunction with such variations and positions of patient 110 pursuant to the surgical procedure taking place on patient 110. That is to say, distal portions 18 and 22 of first and second sections of frame 26 may raise or lower from a level position as required directional arrow 118, FIG. 2.


While in the foregoing, embodiments of the present invention have been set forth in considerable detail for the purposes of making a complete disclosure of the invention, it may be apparent to those of skill in the art that numerous changes may be made in such detail without departing from the spirit and principles of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A patient support apparatus for supporting a patient during a medical procedure, the apparatus comprising: a) a patient support structure consisting of first and second open frame sections and a hinge, the first and second frame sections coupled at outer ends to supports and coupled at inner ends to the hinge;b) a chest platform slidingly mounted on the first open frame section for receiving an upper portion of the patient, wherein the chest platform is prevented from freely sliding on the first open frame section and is configured to slide only when the first and second frame sections articulate about the hinge,c) a chest support coupled to the chest platform; andd) a hip support coupled to the second open frame section.
  • 2. The patient support apparatus of claim 1, wherein the hinge comprises a pair of spaced apart hinges.
  • 3. The patient support apparatus of claim 1, wherein the chest platform is prevented from freely sliding via a motivating mechanism.
  • 4. The patient support apparatus of claim 3, wherein the motivating mechanism causes the chest platform to slide towards the hinge when the hinge articulates so as to position the patient in flexion.
  • 5. The patient support apparatus of claim 4, wherein, when the patient is positioned in flexion, the first and second open frame sections define an upside-down vee with the pair of spaced apart hinges at an apex of the upside-down vee.
  • 6. The patient support structure of claim 4, wherein, when the patient is positioned in flexion, an angle less than about 180 degrees is defined on an underside of the patient support apparatus between the first and second open frame sections.
  • 7. The patient support apparatus of claim 1, wherein the patient support apparatus includes only a single axis of articulation between the outer ends of the first and second open frame sections.
  • 8. In a patient support apparatus for supporting a patient during a medical procedure having first and second open frame sections that are inwardly connected by a pair of spaced apart hinges and outwardly held by supports; the improvement comprising: a) a chest platform slidingly mounted on the first open frame section for receiving an upper portion of the patient, wherein a motivating mechanism causes sliding of the chest platform to coincide with articulating of the pair of spaced apart hinges,b) a chest support connected on the chest platform; andc) a hip support on the second open frame section.
  • 9. The patient support apparatus of claim 8, wherein the patient support apparatus includes only a single axis of articulation between outer ends of the first and second open frame sections.
  • 10. The patient support apparatus of claim 9, wherein the single axis of articulation extends through the pair of spaced apart hinges.
  • 11. The patient support apparatus of claim 8, wherein the motivating mechanism causes the chest platform to slide towards the pair of spaced apart hinges when the pair of spaced apart hinges articulates so as to decrease an underside angle between the first and second open frame sections.
  • 12. The patient support apparatus of claim 11, wherein the underside angle is defined on a side of the first and second open frame sections that is opposite the chest and hip supports.
  • 13. The patient support apparatus of claim 8, further comprising a head support, the head support positioned above the chest support and connected on the chest platform.
  • 14. The patient support apparatus of claim 8, further comprising a pair of arm rests that extend from the first open frame section for support therefrom, and that are connected to the chest platform.
  • 15. The patient support apparatus of claim 8, wherein the motivating mechanism prevents the chest platform from freely sliding on the first open frame section.
  • 16. The patient support apparatus of claim 8, wherein the hip support comprises a pad, and wherein a portion of the pad slopes downwardly toward the second frame section in a direction away from the hinges.
  • 17. The patient support apparatus of claim 8, wherein the first and second open frame sections are inwardly connected by only a single pair of spaced apart hinges.
  • 18. The patient support apparatus of claim 8, wherein the motivating mechanism causes the chest platform to slide towards the pair of spaced apart hinges when the pair of spaced apart hinges articulates so as to increasingly position the patient in flexion.
  • 19. The patient support apparatus of claim 18, wherein, when the patient is positioned in flexion, the first and second open frame sections define an upside-down vee with the pair of spaced apart hinges at an apex of the upside-down vee.
  • 20. The patient support structure of claim 18, wherein, when the patient is positioned in flexion, an angle less than about 180 degrees is defined on an underside of the patient support apparatus between the first and second open frame sections.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/694,765, filed Jan. 2, 2013 which was a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/317,397, filed Oct. 17, 2011, both of which are incorporated by reference herein. Application Ser. No. 13/317,397 was a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/803,252, filed Jun. 22, 2010. Application Ser. No. 13/317,397 was also a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/288,516, filed Oct. 20, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,739,762, issued Jun. 22, 2010, that claimed the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/960,933, filed Oct. 22, 2007, all of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (192)
Number Name Date Kind
1098477 Cashman Jun 1914 A
1171713 Gilkerson Feb 1916 A
1528835 McCullough Mar 1925 A
1667982 Pearson May 1928 A
1780399 Munson Nov 1930 A
1799692 Knott Apr 1931 A
1938006 Blanchard Dec 1933 A
2188592 Hosken et al. Jan 1940 A
2261297 Frederick Nov 1941 A
2475003 Black Jul 1949 A
2636793 Meyer Apr 1953 A
2688410 Nelson Sep 1954 A
2792945 Brenny May 1957 A
3046071 Shampaine et al. Jul 1962 A
3049726 Getz Aug 1962 A
3281141 Smiley Oct 1966 A
3584321 Buchanan Jun 1971 A
3599964 Magni Aug 1971 A
3766384 Anderson Oct 1973 A
3814414 Chapa Jun 1974 A
3832742 Stryker Sep 1974 A
3988790 Mracek et al. Nov 1976 A
4101120 Seshima Jul 1978 A
4131802 Braden et al. Dec 1978 A
4144880 Daniels Mar 1979 A
4148472 Rais et al. Apr 1979 A
4175550 Leininger et al. Nov 1979 A
4186917 Rais et al. Feb 1980 A
4227269 Johnston Oct 1980 A
4230100 Moon Oct 1980 A
4391438 Heffington, Jr. Jul 1983 A
4474364 Brendgord Oct 1984 A
4503844 Siczek Mar 1985 A
4552346 Schnelle et al. Nov 1985 A
4712781 Watanabe Dec 1987 A
4718077 Moore et al. Jan 1988 A
4763643 Vrzalik Aug 1988 A
4771785 Duer Sep 1988 A
4872657 Lussi Oct 1989 A
4887325 Tesch Dec 1989 A
4937901 Brennan Jul 1990 A
4944500 Mueller et al. Jul 1990 A
4953245 Jung Sep 1990 A
4970737 Sagel Nov 1990 A
5013018 Sicek et al. May 1991 A
5088706 Jackson Feb 1992 A
5131105 Harrawood et al. Jul 1992 A
5131106 Jackson Jul 1992 A
5161267 Smith Nov 1992 A
5163890 Perry, Jr. Nov 1992 A
5181289 Kassai Jan 1993 A
5208928 Kuck et al. May 1993 A
5210887 Kershaw May 1993 A
5210888 Canfield May 1993 A
5230112 Harrawood et al. Jul 1993 A
5231741 Maguire Aug 1993 A
5239716 Fisk Aug 1993 A
5274862 Palmer, Jr. et al. Jan 1994 A
5333334 Kassai Aug 1994 A
5393018 Roth et al. Feb 1995 A
5444882 Andrews et al. Aug 1995 A
5461740 Pearson Oct 1995 A
5468216 Johnson et al. Nov 1995 A
5487195 Ray Jan 1996 A
5499408 Nix Mar 1996 A
5524304 Shutes Jun 1996 A
5544371 Fuller Aug 1996 A
5579550 Bathrick Dec 1996 A
5588705 Chang Dec 1996 A
5613254 Clayman et al. Mar 1997 A
5640730 Godette Jun 1997 A
5645079 Zahiri et al. Jul 1997 A
5658315 Lamb et al. Aug 1997 A
5659909 Pfeuffer et al. Aug 1997 A
5673443 Marmor Oct 1997 A
5737781 Votel Apr 1998 A
5754997 Lussi et al. May 1998 A
5774914 Johnson et al. Jul 1998 A
5794286 Scott et al. Aug 1998 A
5862549 Morton et al. Jan 1999 A
5870784 Elliott Feb 1999 A
5890238 Votel Apr 1999 A
5901388 Cowan May 1999 A
5937456 Norris Aug 1999 A
5996151 Bartow et al. Dec 1999 A
6000076 Webster et al. Dec 1999 A
6035465 Rogozinski Mar 2000 A
6049923 Ochiai Apr 2000 A
6212713 Kuck et al. Apr 2001 B1
6260220 Lamb et al. Jul 2001 B1
6282736 Hand et al. Sep 2001 B1
6282738 Heimbrock et al. Sep 2001 B1
6286164 Lamb et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295671 Reesby et al. Oct 2001 B1
6322251 Ballhaus et al. Nov 2001 B1
6438777 Bender Aug 2002 B1
6496991 Votel Dec 2002 B1
6499162 Lu Dec 2002 B1
6505365 Hanson et al. Jan 2003 B1
6526610 Hand et al. Mar 2003 B1
6634043 Lamb et al. Oct 2003 B2
6638299 Cox Oct 2003 B2
6662388 Friel Dec 2003 B2
6668396 Wei Dec 2003 B2
6681423 Zachrisson Jan 2004 B2
6701553 Hand et al. Mar 2004 B1
6854137 Johnson Feb 2005 B2
6857144 Huang Feb 2005 B1
6862759 Hand et al. Mar 2005 B2
6971131 Bannister Dec 2005 B2
6971997 Ryan et al. Dec 2005 B1
7003828 Roussy Feb 2006 B2
7055195 Roussy Jun 2006 B2
7089612 Rocher et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103931 Somasundaram et al. Sep 2006 B2
7137160 Hand et al. Nov 2006 B2
7152261 Jackson Dec 2006 B2
7189214 Saunders Mar 2007 B1
7197778 Sharps Apr 2007 B2
7290302 Sharps Nov 2007 B2
7331557 Dewert Feb 2008 B2
7343635 Jackson Mar 2008 B2
7428760 McCrimmon Sep 2008 B2
7565708 Jackson Jul 2009 B2
7596820 Nielsen et al. Oct 2009 B2
7653953 Lopez-Sansalvador Feb 2010 B2
7669262 Skripps et al. Mar 2010 B2
7874695 Jensen Jan 2011 B2
8060960 Jackson Nov 2011 B2
8381331 Sharps et al. Feb 2013 B2
8584281 Diel et al. Nov 2013 B2
8677529 Jackson Mar 2014 B2
8707476 Sharps Apr 2014 B2
8707484 Jackson et al. Apr 2014 B2
8719979 Jackson May 2014 B2
8826474 Jackson Sep 2014 B2
8826475 Jackson Sep 2014 B2
8839471 Jackson Sep 2014 B2
8844077 Jackson et al. Sep 2014 B2
8856986 Jackson Oct 2014 B2
8938826 Jackson Jan 2015 B2
8978180 Jackson Mar 2015 B2
20010037524 Truwit Nov 2001 A1
20040098804 Varadharajulu et al. May 2004 A1
20040133983 Newkirk et al. Jul 2004 A1
20060016010 Weismiller Jan 2006 A1
20060123546 Horton et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060185090 Jackson Aug 2006 A1
20070107126 Koch et al. May 2007 A1
20070169265 Saracen et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070192960 Jackson Aug 2007 A1
20080000028 Lemire et al. Jan 2008 A1
20090126116 Lamb et al. May 2009 A1
20100192300 Tannoury et al. Aug 2010 A1
20110099716 Jackson May 2011 A1
20110107516 Jackson May 2011 A1
20110107517 Lamb et al. May 2011 A1
20120144589 Skripps et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120198625 Jackson Aug 2012 A1
20120246829 Lamb et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120255122 Diel et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130111666 Jackson May 2013 A1
20130133137 Jackson May 2013 A1
20130198958 Jackson et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130205500 Jackson Aug 2013 A1
20130219623 Jackson Aug 2013 A1
20130254992 Jackson Oct 2013 A1
20130254993 Jackson Oct 2013 A1
20130254994 Jackson Oct 2013 A1
20130254995 Jackson Oct 2013 A1
20130254996 Jackson Oct 2013 A1
20130254997 Jackson Oct 2013 A1
20130269710 Hight et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130312181 Jackson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130312187 Jackson Nov 2013 A1
20130318718 Jackson Dec 2013 A1
20130318719 Jackson Dec 2013 A1
20130326812 Jackson Dec 2013 A1
20130326813 Jackson Dec 2013 A1
20140007349 Jackson Jan 2014 A1
20140020181 Jackson Jan 2014 A1
20140033436 Jackson Feb 2014 A1
20140068861 Jackson et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140082842 Jackson Mar 2014 A1
20140109316 Jackson et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140196212 Jackson Jul 2014 A1
20140201913 Jackson Jul 2014 A1
20140201914 Jackson Jul 2014 A1
20140208512 Jackson Jul 2014 A1
20140317847 Jackson Oct 2014 A1
20150059094 Jackson Mar 2015 A1
20150150743 Jackson Jun 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
2467091 Dec 2001 CN
569758 Jun 1945 GB
810956 Mar 1959 GB
S53763 Jan 1978 JP
2000060995 Feb 2000 JP
9907320 Feb 1999 WO
0062731 Oct 2000 WO
0160308 Aug 2001 WO
03070145 Aug 2003 WO
WO 2007130679 Nov 2007 WO
2009054969 Apr 2009 WO
2009100692 Aug 2009 WO
WO2010051303 May 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (36)
Entry
Brochure of Smith & Nephew on Spinal Positioning System, 2003, 2004.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 7, 2012).
First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Correction of Inventorship, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Sep. 21, 2012).
Defendant Mizuho Orthopedic Systems, Inc.'s Answer to First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 1, 2012).
Plaintiff Roger P. Jackson, MD's, Reply to Counterclaims, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 26, 2012).
Roger P. Jackson's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 4, 2013).
Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, for Correction of Inventorship, for Breach of a Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreement, and for Misappropriation of Dr. Jackson's Right of Publicity, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 28, 2013).
Defendant Mizuho Orthopedic Systems, Inc.'s Answer to Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 19, 2013).
Defendant Mizuho Osi's Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to the Parties' Joint Scheduling Order, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 22, 2013).
Plaintiff Roger P. Jackson, MD's, Reply to Second Counterclaims, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 12, 2013).
Roger P. Jackson, MD's Disclosure of Proposed Terms to Be Construed, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 5, 2013).
Defendant Mizuho Orthopedic Systems, Inc.'s Disclosure of Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for Construction, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 5, 2013).
Mizuho Orthopedic Systems, Inc.'s Disclosure of Proposed Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. May 13, 2013).
Plaintiff Roger P. Jackson, MD's Disclosure of Preliminary Proposed Claim Constructions, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. May 13, 2013).
Defendant Mizuho Osi's Amended Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to the Parties' Joint Scheduling Order, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. May 15, 2013).
Joint Claim Construction Chart and Joint Prehearing Statement, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Jun. 7, 2013).
Defendant Mizuho Orthopedic Systems, Inc.'s Objections and Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Jun. 24, 2013).
Defendant Mizuho Orthopedic Systems, Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Jul. 31, 2013).
Plaintiff Roger P. Jackson, MD's Opening Claim Construction Brief, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Jul. 31, 2013).
Appendix A Amended Infringement Contentions Claim Chart for Mizuho's Axis System Compared to U.S. Patent No. 7,565,708, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 12, 2013).
Appendix B Amended Infringement Contentions Claim Chart for Mizuho's Axis System Compared to U.S. Patent No. 8,060,960, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 12, 2013).
Appendix C Amended Infringement Contentions Claim Chart for Mizuho's Proaxis System Compared to U.S. Patent No. 7,565,708, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 12, 2013).
Appendix D Amended Infringement Contentions Claim Chart for Mizuho's Proaxis System Compared to U.S. Patent No. 8,060,960, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 12, 2013).
Plaintiff Roger P. Jackson, MD's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 16, 2013).
Defendant Mizuho Orthopedic Systems, Inc's Brief in Response to Plaintiffs Opening Claim Construction Brief, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 16, 2013).
Plaintiff Roger P. Jackson, MD's Suggestions in Support of His Motion to Strike Exhibit A of Mizuho's Opening Claim Construction Brief, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 16, 2013).
Defendant Mizuho Orthopedic Systems, Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Sep. 3, 2013).
Transcript of Claim Construction Hearing, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 11, 2013).
Plaintiff Roger P. Jackson, MD's Claim Construction Presentation for U.S. District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 11, 2013).
Mizuho's Claim Construction Argument, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 11, 2013).
Order, Jackson v. Mizuho Orthopedic Sys., Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01031 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 4, 2014).
Canadian Office Action, CA2803110, dated Mar. 5, 2015.
Chinese Office Action, CN 201180039162.0, dated Jan. 19, 2015.
European Search Report, EP11798501.0, dated Mar. 30, 2015.
Japanese Office Action, JP 2014-132463, dated Jun. 18, 2015.
Japanese Office Action, JP 2014-142074, dated Jun. 18, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140173826 A1 Jun 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60960933 Oct 2007 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 13694765 Jan 2013 US
Child 14195326 US
Parent 13317397 Oct 2011 US
Child 13694765 US
Parent 12803252 Jun 2010 US
Child 13317397 US
Parent 12288516 Oct 2008 US
Child 12803252 US