I. Field
The present invention relates generally to systems and methods for performing surgical procedures and, more particularly, for accessing a surgical target site in order to perform surgical procedures.
II. Description of Related Art
A noteworthy trend in the medical community is the move away from performing surgery via traditional “open” techniques in favor of minimally invasive or minimal access techniques. Open surgical techniques are generally undesirable in that they typically require large incisions and high amounts of tissue displacement to gain access to the surgical target site, which produces concomitantly high amounts of pain, lengthened hospitalization (increasing health care costs), and high morbidity in the patient population. Less-invasive surgical techniques (including so-called “minimal access” and “minimally invasive” techniques) are gaining favor due to the fact that they involve accessing the surgical target site via incisions of substantially smaller size with greatly reduced tissue displacement requirements. This, in turn, reduces the pain, morbidity and cost associated with such procedures. The access systems developed to date, however, fail in various respects to meet all the needs of the surgeon population.
One drawback associated with prior art surgical access systems relates to the ease with which the operative corridor can be created, as well as maintained over time, depending upon the particular surgical target site. For example, when accessing surgical target sites located beneath or behind musculature or other relatively strong tissue (such as, by way of example only, the psoas muscle adjacent to the spine), it has been found that advancing an operative corridor-establishing instrument directly through such tissues can be challenging and/or lead to unwanted or undesirable effects (such as stressing or tearing the tissues). While certain efforts have been undertaken to reduce the trauma to tissue while creating an operative corridor, such as (by way of example only) the sequential dilation system of U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,044 to Foley et al., these attempts are nonetheless limited in their applicability based on the relatively narrow operative corridor. More specifically, based on the generally cylindrical nature of the so-called “working cannula,” the degree to which instruments can be manipulated and/or angled within the cannula can be generally limited or restrictive, particularly if the surgical target site is a relatively deep within the patient.
Efforts have been undertaken to overcome this drawback, such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,524,320 to DiPoto, wherein an expandable portion is provided at the distal end of a cannula for creating a region of increased cross-sectional area adjacent to the surgical target site. While this system may provide for improved instrument manipulation relative to sequential dilation access systems (at least at deep sites within the patient), it is nonetheless flawed in that the deployment of the expandable portion may inadvertently compress or impinge upon sensitive tissues adjacent to the surgical target site. For example, in anatomical regions having neural and/or vasculature structures, such a blind expansion may cause the expandable portion to impinge upon these sensitive tissues and cause neural and/or vasculature compromise, damage and/or pain for the patient.
This highlights yet another drawback with the prior art surgical access systems, namely, the challenges in establishing an operative corridor through or near tissue having major neural structures which, if contacted or impinged, may result in neural impairment for the patient. Due to the threat of contacting such neural structures, efforts thus far have largely restricted to establishing operative corridors through tissue having little or substantially reduced neural structures, which effectively limits the number of ways a given surgical target site can be accessed. This can be seen, by way of example only, in the spinal arts, where the exiting nerve roots and neural plexus structures in the psoas muscle have rendered a lateral or far lateral access path (so-called trans-psoas approach) to the lumbar spine virtually impossible. Instead, spine surgeons are largely restricted to accessing the spine from the posterior (to perform, among other procedures, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)) or from the anterior (to perform, among other procedures, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)).
Posterior-access procedures involve traversing a shorter distance within the patient to establish the operative corridor, albeit at the price of oftentimes having to reduce or cut away part of the posterior bony structures (i.e. lamina, facets, spinous process) in order to reach the target site (which typically comprises the disc space). Anterior-access procedures are relatively simple for surgeons in that they do not involve reducing or cutting away bony structures to reach the surgical target site. However, they are nonetheless disadvantageous in that they require traversing through a much greater distance within the patient to establish the operative corridor, oftentimes requiring an additional surgeon to assist with moving the various internal organs out of the way to create the operative corridor.
The present invention is directed at eliminating, or at least minimizing the effects of, the above-identified drawbacks in the prior art.
The present invention accomplishes this goal by providing a novel access system and related methods which involve: (1) distracting the tissue between the patient's skin and the surgical target site to create an area of distraction (otherwise referred to herein as a “distraction corridor”); (2) retracting the distraction corridor to establish and maintain an operative corridor; and/or (3) detecting the existence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures before, during and after the establishment of the operative corridor through (or near) any of a variety of tissues having such neural structures which, if contacted or impinged, may otherwise result in neural impairment for the patient.
As used herein, “distraction” or “distracting” is defined as the act of creating a corridor (extending to a location at or near the surgical target site) having a certain cross-sectional area and shape (“distraction corridor”), and “retraction” or “retracting” is defined as the act of creating an operative corridor by increasing the cross-sectional area of the distraction corridor (and/or modifying its shape) with at least one retractor blade and thereafter maintaining that increased cross-sectional area and/or modified shape such that surgical instruments can be passed through operative corridor to the surgical target site. It is expressly noted that, although described herein largely in terms of use in spinal surgery, the access system of the present invention is suitable for use in any number of additional surgical procedures, including those wherein tissue having significant neural structures must be passed through (or near) in order to establish an operative corridor.
According to one aspect, the present invention provides a surgical access system having an initial tissue distraction assembly and a pivot linkage assembly forming part of a secondary distraction assembly and a retraction assembly. The secondary distraction assembly includes first and second distraction arms forming part of the pivot linkage assembly, first and second speculum blades extending through receiving passageways formed within the first and second distraction arms, and a handle assembly forming part of the pivot linkage. As will be described below, the distraction arms may be advanced over the initial distraction assembly such that the speculum blades are passed into the tissue to be secondarily distracted. Thereafter, the handle assembly may be activated to perform the necessary distraction. That is, the handle assembly can be manipulated by a user to move the first and second distraction arms away from one another, which will at the same time move the distal ends of the speculum blades to create a full distraction corridor.
After the secondary distraction, a pair of retractors blades may be introduced into the distraction corridor and positioned to create an operative corridor to the surgical target site. In a preferred embodiment, retractor blade is introduced first and positioned such that its distal end is generally located towards the posterior region of the spinal target site, which forms a useful barrier to prevent any exiting nerve roots 30 from entering the surgical target site, as well as to prevent any surgical instruments from passing outside the surgical target site and into contact with the exiting nerve roots 30 or other sensitive tissue. The retractor blade may thereafter be introduced and moved in a generally anterior direction away from the retractor blade, effectively creating the operative corridor. The retractor blades may be locked in relation to the pivot linkage assembly in any number of suitable fashions, including but not limited to the use of the nut-bolt assemblies well known in the art. To lock the retractor blades in relation to the surgical target site, optional locking members may be advanced through receiving passageways formed in one or more of the retractor blades such that a distal region of the locking member is brought into a press-fit, secure engagement between the adjacent vertebral bodies to thereby maintain the respective retractor blade in position. With the operative corridor established, any of a variety of surgical instruments, devices, or implants may be passed through and/or manipulated at or near the surgical target site depending upon the given surgical procedure.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, any number of distraction assemblies and/or retraction assemblies (including but not limited to those described herein) may be equipped to detect the presence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures during the steps tissue distraction and/or retraction. To accomplish this, one or more stimulation electrodes are provided on the various components of the distraction assemblies and/or retraction assemblies, a stimulation source (e.g. voltage or current) is coupled to the stimulation electrodes, a stimulation signal is emitted from the stimulation electrodes as the various components are advanced towards the surgical target site, and the patient is monitored to determine if the stimulation signal causes muscles associated with nerves or neural structures within the tissue to innervate. If the nerves innervate, this indicates that neural structures may be in close proximity to the distraction and/or retraction assemblies.
This monitoring may be accomplished via any number of suitable fashions, including but not limited to observing visual twitches in muscle groups associated with the neural structures likely to found in the tissue, as well as any number of monitoring systems. In either situation (traditional EMG or surgeon-driven EMG monitoring), the access system of the present invention may advantageously be used to traverse tissue that would ordinarily be deemed unsafe or undesirable, thereby broadening the number of manners in which a given surgical target site may be accessed.
Many advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art with a reading of this specification in conjunction with the attached drawings, wherein like reference numerals are applied to like elements and wherein:
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. It is furthermore to be readily understood that, although discussed below primarily within the context of spinal surgery, the surgical access system of the present invention may be employed in any number of anatomical settings to provide access to any number of different surgical target sites throughout the body. The surgical access system disclosed herein boasts a variety of inventive features and components that warrant patent protection, both individually and in combination.
The present invention is directed at a novel surgical access system and related methods which involve creating a distraction corridor to a surgical target site, thereafter retracting the distraction corridor to establish and maintain an operative corridor to the surgical target site, and optionally detecting the existence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures before, during and/or after the formation of the distraction and/or operative corridors. The steps of distraction followed by retraction are advantageous because they provide the ability to more easily position an operative corridor-establishing device through tissue that is strong, thick or otherwise challenging to traverse in order to access a surgical target site. The various distraction systems of the present invention are advantageous in that they provide an improved manner of atraumatically establishing a distraction corridor prior to the use of the retraction systems of the present invention. The various retractor systems of the present invention are advantageous in that they provide an operative corridor having improved cross-sectional area and shape (including customization thereof) relative to the prior art surgical access systems. Moreover, by optionally equipping the various distraction systems and/or retraction systems with one or more electrodes, an operative corridor may be established through (or near) any of a variety of tissues having such neural structures which, if contacted or impinged, may otherwise result in neural impairment for the patient.
After the secondary distraction, a pair of retractors blades 26, 28 may be introduced into the distraction corridor and positioned to create an operative corridor to the surgical target site. In a preferred embodiment, retractor blade 26 is introduced first and positioned such that its distal end is generally located towards the posterior region of the spinal target site, which forms a useful barrier to prevent any exiting nerve roots 30 from entering the surgical target site, as well as to prevent any surgical instruments from passing outside the surgical target site and into contact with the exiting nerve roots 30 or other sensitive tissue. The retractor blade 28 may thereafter be introduced and moved in a generally anterior direction away from the retractor blade 26, effectively creating the operative corridor. The retractor blades 26, 28 may be locked in relation to the pivot linkage assembly 14 in any number of suitable fashions, including but not limited to the use of the nut-bolt assemblies 32, 34 well known in the art. To lock the retractor blades 26, 28 in relation to the surgical target site, optional locking members 36 may be advanced through receiving passageways formed in one or more of the retractor blades 26, 28 such that a distal region of the locking member 36 is brought into a press-fit, secure engagement between the adjacent vertebral bodies to thereby maintain the respective retractor blade 26, 28 in position. With the operative corridor established, any of a variety of surgical instruments, devices, or implants may be passed through and/or manipulated at or near the surgical target site depending upon the given surgical procedure.
The initial tissue distraction assembly 12 may include any number of components capable of performing the necessary initial distraction. By way of example, with combined reference to
The inner dilator 46 is preferably constructed having an inner diameter approximating the diameter of the K-wire 44 (such as, by way of example only, 1.5 mm), an outer diameter of increased dimension (such as, by way of example only, 6.5 mm), and indicia for determining the distance between a distal end 52 and the skin of the patient. The outer dilator 48 is similarly preferably constructed having an inner diameter approximating the outer diameter of the inner dilator 46 (such as, by way of example only, 6.5 mm), an outer diameter of increased dimension (such as, by way of example only, 9 mm), and indicia for determining the distance between a distal end 54 and the skin of the patient. The respective lengths of the K-wire 44 and dilators 46, 48 may vary depending upon the given surgical target site (that is, the “depth” of the surgical target site within the patient). It will be similarly appreciated that the diameters and dimensions for these elements may also vary depending upon the particular surgical procedure. All such surgically appropriate variations (length, diameter, etc. . . . ) are contemplated as falling within the scope of the present invention. It is further contemplated and within the scope of the present invention that additional dilators of increasing diameters may be employed to sequentially dilate to the point where a bladed retractor or retraction assembly may be employed to thereafter create an operative corridor according to the present invention (without the need for secondary distraction as described below).
Referring to
First and second linkage assemblies 70, 72 extend between the distal ends of the pivot arms 60-66, each including a pair of linkages 74, 76 pivotably coupled together via a rod 78. A ratchet member 68 may be used to maintain the first pivot arms 60 relative to the second pivot arm 62 as they are separated during use. As the pivot arms 60, 62 are moved away from one another, the first and second distraction arms 16, 18 (being coupled to or integrally formed with the linkages 76 of first and second linkage assemblies 72, 74) will similarly move away from one another. With the speculum blades 20, 22 disposed within the passageways 38 (
The pivot linkage assembly 14 may be constructed from any number of materials suitable for medical applications, including but not limited to plastics, metals, ceramics or any combination thereof. Depending on the construction, some or all of the pivot linkage assembly 14 may be disposable (i.e. single use) and/or reusable (i.e. multi-use).
The speculum blades 20, 22 are generally elongate in nature and include a pair of mating grooves 88 formed along the inwardly facing surfaces of the speculum blades 20, 22 which, when mated together, form a lumen capable of passing over the K-wire 44. In a preferred embodiment, the speculum blades 20, 22 are separable from distraction arms 16, 18 such that the blades 20, 22 can be introduced into the patient and thereafter engaged with the handle assembly 24 to effectuate the secondary distraction. As will be described in greater detail below, this separable construction allows the speculum blades 20, 22 to be introduced down to the surgical target site by passing them through the outer dilator 48 and over with the K-wire 44 (the latter by virtue of the lumen formed by the pair of mating grooves 88 along the inwardly facing surfaces of the speculum blades 20, 22). This is obviously only possible by first removing the inner dilator 46 from within the second dilator 48 while leaving the K-wire 44 in place. Although shown and described herein as being of separable construction, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the speculum blades 20, 22 may be of generally non-separable or fixed construction with the pivot arms 16, 18 of the handle assembly 24.
The retraction of the present invention is performed by expanding and/or modifying the distraction corridor to establish and maintain an operative corridor to the surgical target site. As shown in
In a preferred embodiment, one or more of the retractor blades 90, 92 may be equipped with a passageway 102 at or near the distal end of the main body 94, such as by providing a generally planar member 104 along the generally curved distal region of the retractor blade 90, 92. This passageway 102 is dimensioned to receive a locking member 36 of the type shown in
The retractor blades 90, 92 may also be optionally provided with at least one guard member 114 extending in a curved fashion (and/or, although not shown, in a generally straight fashion) from the distal end of the retractor blade 90, 92. The guard member 114 may be provided, by way of example, for the purpose of preventing tissue (such as nerve roots in spinal surgery applications) from entering into the operative corridor during surgery and for preventing instruments from extending outside the operative corridor and/or the general vicinity of the surgical target site.
The retractor blades 90, 92 may also be equipped with any number of different mechanisms for transporting or emitting light at or near the surgical target site to aid the surgeon's ability to visualize the surgical target site, instruments and/or implants during the given surgical procedure. For example, one or more strands of fiber optic cable may be coupled to the retractor blades 90, 92 such that light may be delivered from a light source and selectively emitted into the operative corridor and/or the surgical target site. This may be accomplished by constructing the retractor blades 90, 92 of suitable material (such as clear polycarbonate) and configuration such that light may be transmitted generally distally through a light exit region formed along the entire inner periphery of the retractor blade 90, 92 and located in the general vicinity as the distal opening of the passageway 102. This may be performed by providing the retractor blade 90, 92 having light-transmission characteristics (such as with clear polycarbonate construction) and transmitting the light almost entirely within the walls of the retractor blade 90, 92 (such as by frosting or otherwise rendering opaque portions of the exterior and/or interior and coupling the light source thereto such as via a port) until it exits a portion along the interior of the retractor blades 90, 92 to shine at or near the surgical target site.
In one embodiment, a variety of sets of retractor blades 90, 92 may be provided, each having a different length to account for any number of possible surgical target sites. In a further embodiment, each set of retractor blades 90, 92 may be marked or color-coded to aid in indicating to the surgeon the particular length of the blade 90, 92 or the depth of the surgical target site.
The retractor blades 90, 92 and the locking member 36 may be constructed from any number of materials suitable for medical applications, including but not limited to plastics, metals, ceramics or any combination thereof. Depending on the construction, some or all of these devices may be disposable (i.e. single use) and/or reusable (i.e. multi-use).
Any number of suitable mounting units (not shown) may be employed to maintain the pivot linkage assembly 14 in a fixed and rigid fashion relative to the patient. By way of example only, this may be accomplished by providing the mounting unit as a generally U-shaped mounting arm for lockable engagement with the pivot linkage assembly 14, and a coupling mechanism (not shown) extending between the mounting arm and a rigid structure (such as the operating table) for maintaining the U-shaped mounting arm in a fixed and rigid position.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, any number of distraction components and/or retraction components (including but not limited to those described herein) may be equipped to detect the presence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures during the steps tissue distraction and/or retraction. This is accomplished by employing the following steps: (1) one or more stimulation electrodes are provided on the various distraction and/or retraction components; (2) a stimulation source (e.g. voltage or current) is coupled to the stimulation electrodes; (3) a stimulation signal is emitted from the stimulation electrodes as the various components are advanced towards or maintained at or near the surgical target site; and (4) the patient is monitored to determine if the stimulation signal causes muscles associated with nerves or neural structures within the tissue to innervate. If the nerves innervate, this may indicate that neural structures may be in close proximity to the distraction and/or retraction components.
Neural monitoring may be accomplished via any number of suitable fashions, including but not limited to observing visual twitches in muscle groups associated with the neural structures likely to found in the tissue, as well as any number of monitoring systems, including but not limited to any commercially available “traditional” electromyography (EMG) system (that is, typically operated by a neurophysiologist. Such monitoring may also be carried out via the surgeon-driven EMG monitoring system shown and described in the following commonly owned and co-pending PCT Applications (collectively “NeuroVision PCT Applications”): PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US02/22247, entitled “System and Methods for Determining Nerve Proximity, Direction, and Pathology During Surgery,” filed on Jul. 11, 2002; PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US02/30617, entitled “System and Methods for Performing Surgical Procedures and Assessments,” filed on Sep. 25, 2002; PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US02/35047, entitled “System and Methods for Performing Percutaneous Pedicle Integrity Assessments,” filed on Oct. 30, 2002; and PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US03/02056, entitled “System and Methods for Determining Nerve Direction to a Surgical Instrument,” filed Jan. 15, 2003. The entire contents of each of the above-enumerated NeuroVision PCT Applications is hereby expressly incorporated by reference into this disclosure as if set forth fully herein.
In any case (visual monitoring, traditional EMG and/or surgeon-driven EMG monitoring), the access system of the present invention may advantageously be used to traverse tissue that would ordinarily be deemed unsafe or undesirable, thereby broadening the number of manners in which a given surgical target site may be accessed.
In order to use the monitoring system 120, then, these surgical access instruments must be connected to the connectors 156a, 156b and/or 156c, at which point the user may selectively initiate a stimulation signal (preferably, a current signal) from the control unit 122 to a particular surgical access instruments. Stimulating the electrode(s) on these surgical access instruments before, during and/or after establishing operative corridor will cause nerves that come into close or relative proximity to the surgical access instruments to depolarize, producing a response in a myotome associated with the innervated nerve.
The control unit 122 includes a touch screen display 140 and a base 142, which collectively contain the essential processing capabilities (software and/or hardware) for controlling the monitoring system 120. The control unit 122 may include an audio unit 118 that emits sounds according to a location of a surgical element with respect to a nerve. The patient module 124 is connected to the control unit 122 via a data cable 144, which establishes the electrical connections and communications (digital and/or analog) between the control unit 122 and patient module 124. The main functions of the control unit 122 include receiving user commands via the touch screen display 140, activating stimulation electrodes on the surgical access instruments, processing signal data according to defined algorithms, displaying received parameters and processed data, and monitoring system status and report fault conditions. The touch screen display 140 is preferably equipped with a graphical user interface (GUI) capable of communicating information to the user and receiving instructions from the user. The display 140 and/or base 142 may contain patient module interface circuitry (hardware and/or software) that commands the stimulation sources, receives digitized signals and other information from the patient module 124, processes the EMG responses to extract characteristic information for each muscle group, and displays the processed data to the operator via the display 140.
In one embodiment, the monitoring system 120 is capable of determining nerve direction relative to one or more of the K-wire 44, dilation cannula 46, 48, speculum blades 20, 22, the retractor blades 90, 92, and/or the guard members 114 before, during and/or following the creation of an operative corridor to a surgical target site. Monitoring system 120 accomplishes this by having the control unit 122 and patient module 124 cooperate to send electrical stimulation signals to one or more of the stimulation electrodes provided on these instruments. Depending upon the location of the surgical access system 10 within a patient (and more particularly, to any neural structures), the stimulation signals may cause nerves adjacent to or in the general proximity of the surgical access system 10 to depolarize. This causes muscle groups to innervate and generate EMG responses, which can be sensed via the EMG harness 126. The nerve direction feature of the system 120 is based on assessing the evoked response of the various muscle myotomes monitored by the system 120 via the EMG harness 126.
By monitoring the myotomes associated with the nerves (via the EMG harness 126 and recording electrode 127) and assessing the resulting EMG responses (via the control unit 122), the surgical access system 10 is capable of detecting the presence of (and optionally the distant and/or direction to) such nerves. This provides the ability to actively negotiate around or past such nerves to safely and reproducibly form the operative corridor to a particular surgical target site, as well as monitor to ensure that no neural structures migrate into contact with the surgical access system 10 after the operative corridor has been established. In spinal surgery, for example, this is particularly advantageous in that the surgical access system 10 may be particularly suited for establishing an operative corridor to an intervertebral target site in a postero-lateral, trans-psoas fashion so as to avoid the bony posterior elements of the spinal column.
The initial distraction assembly 12 (
The angled nature of the distal electrode 200 is also important in that it provides the ability to determine the location of nerves or neural structures relative to the K-wire 44 as it is advanced towards or resting at or near the surgical target site. This “directional” capability is achieved by the fact that the angled nature of the electrode 200 causes the electrical stimulation to be projected away from the distal portion of the K-wire 44 in a focused, or directed fashion. The end result is that nerves or neural structures which are generally closer to the side of the K-wire 44 on which the electrode 200 is disposed will have a higher likelihood of firing or being innervated that nerves or neural structures on the opposite side as the electrode 200.
The direction to such nerves or neural structures may thus be determined by physically rotating the K-wire 44 at a particular point within the patient's tissue and monitoring to see if any neural stimulation occurs at a given point within the rotation. Such monitoring can be performed via visual observation, a traditional EMG monitoring, as well as the nerve surveillance system disclosed in the above-referenced NeuroVision PCT Applications. If the signals appear more profound or significant at a given point within the rotation, the surgeon will be able tell where the corresponding nerves or neural structures are, by way of example only, by looking at reference information (such as the indicia) on the exposed part of the K-wire 44 (which reference point is preferably set forth in the exact same orientation as the electrode 200).
Dilators 46, 48 may also be provided with angled electrodes 204, 206, respectively, for the purpose of determining the location of nerves or neural structures relative to the dilators 46, 48 as they are advanced over the K-wire 44 towards or positioned at or near the surgical target site. Due to this similarity in function with the electrode 200 of the K-wire 44, a repeat explanation is not deemed necessary. The dilators 46, 48 may be equipped with the electrodes 204, 206 via any number of suitable methods, including but not limited to providing electrically conductive elements within the walls of the dilators 46, 48, such as by manufacturing the dilators 46, 48 from plastic or similar material capable of injection molding or manufacturing the dilators 46, 48 from aluminum (or similar metallic substance) and providing outer insulation layer with exposed regions (such as by anodizing the exterior of the aluminum dilator).
According to one aspect of the present invention, additional neural monitoring equipment may be employed so as to further prevent inadvertent contact with neural structures. For example, after the initial dilator 46 has been withdrawn in order to subsequently receive the mated speculum blades 20, 22, a confirmation probe (providing a stimulation signal) may be inserted through the outer dilator 48 and to a point at or near the surgical target site. The confirmation probe may thereafter be stimulated for the purpose of double-checking to ensure that no nerves or neural structures are disposed in the tissue near (or have migrated into the vicinity of) the distal end 54 of the outer dilator 48 before introducing the speculum blades 20, 22. By confirming in this fashion, the outer dilator 48 may be removed following the introduction of the speculum blades 20, 22 and the secondary distraction performed (by coupling the handle assembly 24 to the blades 20, 22 and expanding) without fear of inadvertently causing the speculum blades 20, 22 to contact nerves or neural structures.
The secondary distraction of the present invention (
The retractor blades 90, 92 of the present invention (
The surgical access system 10 of the present invention may be sold or distributed to end users in any number of suitable kits or packages (sterile and/or non-sterile) containing some or all of the various components described herein. For example, the pivot linkage assembly 14 may be provided such that the pivot arms 16, 18 and speculum blades 20, 22 are disposable and the retractor blades 90, 92 are reusable. In a further embodiment, an initial kit may include these materials, including a variety of sets of retractor blades 90, 92 having varying (or “incremental”) lengths to account for surgical target sites of varying locations within the patient.
The surgical access system 10 of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the spinal application shown in
Nerve surveillance is preferably conducted during this step (via electrode 200) to monitor for the existence of (and optionally the distance and direction to) nerves or neural structures in the tissue through which the K-wire 44 must pass to reach the surgical target site. According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is generally desired to advance the K-wire 44 such the distal electrode 200 is disposed a distance anterior to the exiting nerve root 300 (such as, by way of example, 10 mm). As shown in
As shown in
With reference to
With reference to
Turning to
As shown in
The end result is shown in
In a further protective measure, each retractor blade 90, 92 is equipped with a guard member 114 to prevent similar ingress and egress. Both guard members 114 (as well as additional regions of the distal region 110 of the locking member 36) may be provided with electrodes 210, 212, respectively, capable of performing nerve surveillance to monitor for the existence of (and optionally the distance and direction to) nerves or neural structures in the tissue or region surrounding or adjacent to these components while disposed in the general vicinity of the surgical target site. The electrode 210 on the guard member 114 of the posterior retractor blade 90, in particular, may be used to assess the status or health of the nerve root 300, especially if the nerve root 300 is in close proximity to that guard member 114. This may be performed by using the nerve status determination systems or techniques disclosed in co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,500,128, entitled “Nerve Proximity and Status Detection System and Method,” the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference as is set forth fully herein.
As evident from the above discussion and drawings, the present invention accomplishes the goal of providing a novel surgical access system and related methods which involve creating a distraction corridor to a surgical target site, thereafter retracting the distraction corridor to establish and maintain an operative corridor to the surgical target site, and optionally detecting the existence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures before, during and/or after the formation of the distraction and/or operative corridors.
The steps of distraction followed by retraction are advantageous because they provide the ability to more easily position an operative corridor-establishing device through tissue that is strong, thick or otherwise challenging to traverse in order to access a surgical target site. The various distraction systems of the present invention are advantageous in that they provide an improved manner of atraumatically establishing a distraction corridor prior to the use of the retraction systems of the present invention. The various retractor systems of the present invention are advantageous in that they provide an operative corridor having improved cross-sectional area and shape (including customization thereof) relative to the prior art surgical access systems. Moreover, by optionally equipping the various distraction systems and/or retraction systems with one or more electrodes, an operative corridor may be established through (or near) any of a variety of tissues having such neural structures which, if contacted or impinged, may otherwise result in neural impairment for the patient.
The surgical access system of the present invention can be used in any of a wide variety of surgical or medical applications, above and beyond the spinal applications discussed herein. By way of example only, in spinal applications, any number of implants and/or instruments may be introduced through the working cannula 50, including but not limited to spinal fusion constructs (such as allograft implants, ceramic implants, cages, mesh, etc.), fixation devices (such as pedicle and/or facet screws and related tension bands or rod systems), and any number of motion-preserving devices (including but not limited to nucleus replacement and/or total disc replacement systems).
While certain embodiments have been described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that variations may be accomplished in view of these teachings without deviating from the spirit or scope of the present application. For example, with regard to the monitoring system 120, it may be implemented using any combination of computer programming software, firmware or hardware. As a preparatory act to practicing the system 120 or constructing an apparatus according to the application, the computer programming code (whether software or firmware) according to the application will typically be stored in one or more machine readable storage mediums such as fixed (hard) drives, diskettes, optical disks, magnetic tape, semiconductor memories such as ROMs, PROMs, etc., thereby making an article of manufacture in accordance with the application. The article of manufacture containing the computer programming code may be used by either executing the code directly from the storage device, by copying the code from the storage device into another storage device such as a hard disk, RAM, etc. or by transmitting the code on a network for remote execution. As can be envisioned by one of skill in the art, many different combinations of the above may be used and accordingly the present application is not limited by the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/757,035, filed Feb. 1, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/466,398, filed May 8, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/649,604 filed Dec. 30, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,182,423), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/635,418 filed Dec. 10, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,192,356), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/428,081, filed Apr. 22, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,935,051), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/608,362 filed Jun. 26, 2003 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,582,058), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/392,214, filed Jun. 26, 2002, the entire contents of these applications are hereby expressly incorporated by reference into this disclosure as if set forth fully herein. The present application also incorporates by reference the following co-assigned patent applications in their entireties: PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US02/22247, entitled “System and Methods for Determining Nerve Proximity, Direction, and Pathology During Surgery,” filed on Jul. 11, 2002 (published as WO03/005887); PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US02/30617, entitled “System and Methods for Performing Surgical Procedures and Assessments,” filed on Sep. 25, 2002 (published as WO 03/026482); PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US02/35047, entitled “System and Methods for Performing Percutaneous Pedicle Integrity Assessments,” filed on Oct. 30, 2002 (published as WO/03037170); and PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US03/02056, entitled “System and Methods for Determining Nerve Direction to a Surgical Instrument,” filed Jan. 15, 2003 (published as WO/2004064634).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
208227 | Dorr | Sep 1878 | A |
509226 | Kellogg | Nov 1893 | A |
972983 | Arthur | Oct 1910 | A |
1003232 | Cerbo | Oct 1910 | A |
1044348 | Cerbo | Jun 1912 | A |
1328624 | Graham | Jan 1920 | A |
1548184 | Cameron | Aug 1925 | A |
1919120 | O' Connor et al. | Jul 1933 | A |
2594086 | Smith | Apr 1952 | A |
2704061 | Amspacker | Mar 1955 | A |
2704064 | Fizzell et al. | Mar 1955 | A |
2736002 | Oriel | Feb 1956 | A |
2808826 | Reiner et al. | Oct 1957 | A |
2840082 | Salvatore | Jun 1958 | A |
3364929 | Ide et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3664329 | Naylor | May 1972 | A |
3682162 | Colyer | Aug 1972 | A |
3740839 | Otte et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3785368 | McCarthy et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3803716 | Garnier | Apr 1974 | A |
3830226 | Staub et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3957036 | Normann | May 1976 | A |
D245789 | Shea et al. | Sep 1977 | S |
4099519 | Warren | Jul 1978 | A |
4164214 | Stark et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4207897 | Lloyd et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4224949 | Scott et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4226228 | Shin et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4226288 | Collins, Jr. | Oct 1980 | A |
4235242 | Howson et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4285347 | Hess | Aug 1981 | A |
4291705 | Severinghaus et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4449532 | Storz | May 1984 | A |
4461300 | Christensen | Jul 1984 | A |
4512351 | Pohndorf | Apr 1985 | A |
4515168 | Chester et al. | May 1985 | A |
4519403 | Dickhudt | May 1985 | A |
4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
4561445 | Berke et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4562832 | Wilder et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4573448 | Kambin | Mar 1986 | A |
4592369 | Davis et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4595013 | Jones | Jun 1986 | A |
4595018 | Rantala | Jun 1986 | A |
4611597 | Kraus | Sep 1986 | A |
4616635 | Caspar et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4633889 | Talalla | Jan 1987 | A |
4658835 | Pohndorf | Apr 1987 | A |
D295445 | Freeman | Apr 1988 | S |
4744371 | Harris | May 1988 | A |
4753223 | Bremer | Jun 1988 | A |
4759377 | Dykstra | Jul 1988 | A |
4784150 | Voorhies et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4807642 | Brown | Feb 1989 | A |
D300561 | Asa et al. | Apr 1989 | S |
4892105 | Prass | Jan 1990 | A |
4913134 | Luque | Apr 1990 | A |
4917274 | Asa et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917704 | Frey et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4926865 | Oman | May 1990 | A |
4950257 | Hibbs et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962766 | Herzon | Oct 1990 | A |
4964411 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5007902 | Witt | Apr 1991 | A |
5015247 | Michelson | May 1991 | A |
5045054 | Hood et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5052373 | Michelson | Oct 1991 | A |
5058602 | Brody | Oct 1991 | A |
5081990 | Deletis | Jan 1992 | A |
5092344 | Lee | Mar 1992 | A |
5127403 | Brownlee | Jul 1992 | A |
5161533 | Prass et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5171279 | Mathews | Dec 1992 | A |
5178133 | Pena | Jan 1993 | A |
5190561 | Graber | Mar 1993 | A |
5192327 | Brantigan | Mar 1993 | A |
5195541 | Obenchain | Mar 1993 | A |
5196015 | Neubardt | Mar 1993 | A |
5215100 | Spitz et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231974 | Giglio et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
RE34390 | Culver | Sep 1993 | E |
D340521 | Heinzelman et al. | Oct 1993 | S |
5255691 | Otten | Oct 1993 | A |
5261918 | Phillips et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5282468 | Klepinski | Feb 1994 | A |
5284153 | Raymond et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284154 | Raymond et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5295994 | Bonutti | Mar 1994 | A |
5299563 | Seton | Apr 1994 | A |
5312417 | Wilk | May 1994 | A |
5313956 | Knutsson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313962 | Obenchain | May 1994 | A |
5327902 | Lemmen | Jul 1994 | A |
5331975 | Bonutti | Jul 1994 | A |
5333618 | Lekhtman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342384 | Sugarbaker | Aug 1994 | A |
5357983 | Mathews | Oct 1994 | A |
5375067 | Berchin | Dec 1994 | A |
5375594 | Cueva | Dec 1994 | A |
5383876 | Nardella | Jan 1995 | A |
5395317 | Kambin | Mar 1995 | A |
5425772 | Brantigan | Jun 1995 | A |
5433739 | Sluijter et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5450845 | Axelgaard | Sep 1995 | A |
5458638 | Kuslich et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5472426 | Bonati et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474057 | Makower et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474558 | Neubardt | Dec 1995 | A |
5480440 | Kambin | Jan 1996 | A |
5482038 | Ruff | Jan 1996 | A |
5484437 | Michelson | Jan 1996 | A |
5487739 | Aebischer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5509893 | Pracas | Apr 1996 | A |
5514153 | Bonutti | May 1996 | A |
5540235 | Wilson | Jul 1996 | A |
5545222 | Bonutti | Aug 1996 | A |
5549656 | Reiss | Aug 1996 | A |
5560372 | Cory | Oct 1996 | A |
5562736 | Ray et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566678 | Cadwell | Oct 1996 | A |
5569290 | McAfee | Oct 1996 | A |
5571149 | Liss et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579781 | Cooke | Dec 1996 | A |
5593429 | Ruff | Jan 1997 | A |
5599279 | Slotman et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5630813 | Kieturakis | May 1997 | A |
5653761 | Pisharodi | Aug 1997 | A |
5653762 | Pisharodi | Aug 1997 | A |
5667508 | Errico et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669909 | Zdeblick et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671752 | Sinderby et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681265 | Maeda et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688223 | Rosendahl | Nov 1997 | A |
5707359 | Bufalini | Jan 1998 | A |
5711307 | Smits | Jan 1998 | A |
5716415 | Steffee | Feb 1998 | A |
5720751 | Jackson | Feb 1998 | A |
5728046 | Mayer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728159 | Stroever et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741253 | Michelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5741261 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5759159 | Masreliez | Jun 1998 | A |
5762629 | Kambin | Jun 1998 | A |
5766252 | Henry et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772661 | Michelson | Jun 1998 | A |
5775331 | Raymond et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776144 | Leysieffer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5779642 | Nightengale | Jul 1998 | A |
5785658 | Benaron | Jul 1998 | A |
5792044 | Foley | Aug 1998 | A |
5797854 | Hedgecock | Aug 1998 | A |
5797909 | Michelson | Aug 1998 | A |
5800550 | Sertich | Sep 1998 | A |
5813978 | Jako | Sep 1998 | A |
5814073 | Bonutti | Sep 1998 | A |
5814084 | Grivas et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830151 | Hadzic et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851191 | Gozani | Dec 1998 | A |
5851208 | Trott | Dec 1998 | A |
5853373 | Griffith et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860973 | Michelson | Jan 1999 | A |
5862314 | Jeddeloh | Jan 1999 | A |
5865845 | Thalgott | Feb 1999 | A |
5872314 | Clinton | Feb 1999 | A |
5885210 | Cox | Mar 1999 | A |
5885219 | Nightengale | Mar 1999 | A |
5888196 | Bonutti | Mar 1999 | A |
5888224 | Beckers et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891147 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893890 | Pisharodi | Apr 1999 | A |
5902231 | Foley et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910315 | Stevenson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5928139 | Koros et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928158 | Aristides | Jul 1999 | A |
5931777 | Sava | Aug 1999 | A |
5935131 | Bonutti et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938688 | Schiff | Aug 1999 | A |
5944658 | Koros et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954769 | Rosenlicht | Sep 1999 | A |
5968098 | Winslow | Oct 1999 | A |
5976094 | Gozani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976146 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993474 | Ouchi | Nov 1999 | A |
6004262 | Putz et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004312 | Finneran | Dec 1999 | A |
6004326 | Castro et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007487 | Foley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008433 | Stone | Dec 1999 | A |
6010520 | Pattison | Jan 2000 | A |
6015436 | Schoenhoeffer | Jan 2000 | A |
6024696 | Hoftman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024697 | Pisarik | Feb 2000 | A |
6027456 | Feler et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033405 | Winslow et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036638 | Nwawka | Mar 2000 | A |
6038469 | Karlsson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038477 | Kayyali | Mar 2000 | A |
6039761 | Li et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042582 | Ray | Mar 2000 | A |
6045580 | Scarborough et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048342 | Zucherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050992 | Nichols | Apr 2000 | A |
6059829 | Schlaepfer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063088 | Winslow | May 2000 | A |
6074343 | Nathanson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080105 | Spears | Jun 2000 | A |
6083154 | Liu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6083225 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095987 | Shmulewitz | Aug 2000 | A |
6096080 | Nicholson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104957 | Alo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104960 | Duysens et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113638 | Williams et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120503 | Michelson | Sep 2000 | A |
6120506 | Kohrs et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126660 | Dietz | Oct 2000 | A |
6132386 | Gozani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132387 | Gozani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135965 | Tumer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139493 | Koros | Oct 2000 | A |
6142931 | Kaji | Nov 2000 | A |
6146335 | Gozani | Nov 2000 | A |
6152871 | Foley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159179 | Simonson | Dec 2000 | A |
6159211 | Boriani et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159215 | Urbahns et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159230 | Samuels | Dec 2000 | A |
6161047 | King et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174311 | Branch et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181961 | Prass | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187000 | Davison et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193756 | Studer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196969 | Bester et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200347 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206826 | Mathews et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206922 | Zdeblick et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217509 | Foley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224545 | Cocchia et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6224549 | Drongelen | May 2001 | B1 |
6224607 | Michelson | May 2001 | B1 |
6224631 | Kohrs | May 2001 | B1 |
6241771 | Gresser et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245082 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251140 | Marino et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258125 | Paul et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259945 | Epstein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264651 | Underwood et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266558 | Gozani et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273905 | Streeter | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277149 | Boyle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292701 | Prass et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306100 | Prass | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308712 | Shaw | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312392 | Herzon | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319257 | Carignan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325764 | Griffith et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334068 | Hacker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348058 | Melkent et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360750 | Gerber et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371968 | Kogasaka et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371989 | Chauvin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383221 | Scarborough et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395007 | Bhatnagar et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409766 | Brett | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416465 | Brau | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6425859 | Foley et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425887 | McGuckin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425901 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432048 | Francois | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432140 | Lin | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440142 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442814 | Landry et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450952 | Rioux et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451015 | Rittman, III et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454806 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466817 | Kaula et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468205 | Mollenauer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468207 | Fowler, Jr. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468311 | Boyd et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6491724 | Ferree | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500116 | Knapp | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500128 | Marino | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6520907 | Foley et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524320 | DiPoto | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535759 | Epstein et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
D472634 | Anderson | Apr 2003 | S |
D472650 | Green | Apr 2003 | S |
6564078 | Marino et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579244 | Goodwin | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6595998 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599294 | Fuss et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6620157 | Dabney et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626905 | Schmiel et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635086 | Lin | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645194 | Briscoe et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648895 | Burkus et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6672019 | Wenz et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6676703 | Biscup | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679833 | Smith et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6706067 | Shimp et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719692 | Kleffner et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746484 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755841 | Fraser et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760616 | Hoey et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6761739 | Shepard | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770074 | Michelson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6796985 | Bolger et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6810281 | Brock et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6819956 | DiLorenzo | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824564 | Crozet | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829508 | Schulman et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830570 | Frey et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847849 | Mamo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849047 | Goodwin | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855105 | Jackson, III | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869398 | Obenchain | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871099 | Whitehurst et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
D503801 | Jackson | Apr 2005 | S |
6902569 | Parmer et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916330 | Simonson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926728 | Zucherman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929606 | Ritland | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942698 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6945933 | Branch | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951538 | Ritland | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6964687 | Bernard et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6979353 | Bresina | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984245 | McGahan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986788 | Paul et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989031 | Michelson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7018416 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7047082 | Schrom et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7050848 | Hoey et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7079883 | Marino et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089059 | Pless | Aug 2006 | B1 |
D530423 | Miles et al. | Oct 2006 | S |
7166113 | Arambula et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177677 | Kaula et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198598 | Smith et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207949 | Miles et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226451 | Shluzas et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7261688 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7470236 | Kelleher et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7473222 | Dewey et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481766 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7522953 | Kaula et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7556601 | Branch et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7582058 | Miles et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7643884 | Pond et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7691057 | Miles et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7693562 | Marino et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7717959 | William et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7819801 | Miles et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7892173 | Miles et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7905840 | Pimenta et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918891 | Curran et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7920922 | Kaula et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7935051 | Miles et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962191 | Marino et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963927 | Kelleher et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7991463 | Kelleher et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000782 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005535 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8016767 | Miles et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8021430 | Michelson | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8055349 | Kaula et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8068912 | Gharib et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8114019 | Miles et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8133173 | Miles et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137284 | Miles et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8172750 | Miles et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8182423 | Miles et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8187179 | Miles et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8187334 | Curran et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8192356 | Miles et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8192357 | Miles et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8244343 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8246686 | Curran et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8251997 | Michelson | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8303458 | Fukano et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8303498 | Miles et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8303515 | Pimenta et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8337410 | Kelleher et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343046 | Miles et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8343224 | Lynn et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8355780 | Miles et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361156 | Curran et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8388527 | Miles | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8403841 | Miles et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8439832 | Miles et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8489170 | Marino et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8500634 | Miles et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8512235 | Miles et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523768 | Miles et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8548579 | Gharib et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550994 | Miles et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556808 | Miles et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562521 | Miles et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8574301 | Curran et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591432 | Pimenta et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602982 | Miles et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608804 | Curran et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8628469 | Miles et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634904 | Kaula et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8663100 | Miles et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8672840 | Miles et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8673005 | Pimenta et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8679006 | Miles et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685105 | Curran et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696559 | Miles et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8708899 | Miles et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8738123 | Gharib et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8740783 | Gharib et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8747307 | Miles et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8753270 | Miles et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8753271 | Miles et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8764649 | Miles et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8768450 | Gharib et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8780899 | Tillman et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8812116 | Kaula et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814940 | Curran et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821396 | Miles et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8915846 | Miles | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8942801 | Miles et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945004 | Miles et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8956283 | Miles et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8958869 | Kelleher et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8977352 | Gharib et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9014776 | Marino et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9037250 | Kaula et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9180021 | Curran et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9186261 | Pimenta et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9204871 | Miles et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9265493 | Miles et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9301743 | Miles et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9314152 | Pimenta et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9387090 | Arnold et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9456783 | Kaula et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9468405 | Miles et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9474627 | Curran et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9486329 | Pimenta et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9572562 | Miles et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9610071 | Miles et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636233 | Arnold et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
20010037123 | Hancock | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039949 | Loubser | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010056280 | Underwood et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007129 | Marino | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010392 | Desai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016592 | Branch et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020065481 | Cory et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072686 | Hoey et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077632 | Tsou | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020123744 | Reynard | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123780 | Grill et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147387 | Paolitto et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161415 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020193843 | Hill et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030032966 | Foley et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030070682 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083688 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105503 | Marino | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105528 | Shimp et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109928 | Pasquet et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139648 | Foley et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149341 | Clifton | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030225405 | Weiner | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236544 | Lunsford et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040181165 | Hoey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199084 | Kelleher et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225228 | Ferree | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230191 | Frey et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004593 | Simonson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004623 | Miles et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033380 | Tanner et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060006 | Pflueger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075578 | Gharib et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080320 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050149035 | Pimenta et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149054 | Gorek | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182454 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192575 | Pacheco | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203538 | Lo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228232 | Gillinov et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050277812 | Myles | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025703 | Miles et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052826 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052828 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069315 | Miles et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060224078 | Hoey et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235529 | Ralph et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247658 | Pond et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016097 | Farquhar et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070049931 | Justis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049962 | Marino et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072475 | Justin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100212 | Pimenta et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070198062 | Miles et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208228 | Pavento et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070260317 | Ankney et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270842 | Bankoski et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070293782 | Marino | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080058606 | Miles et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058838 | Steinberg | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064976 | Kelleher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064977 | Kelleher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065135 | Marino et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065144 | Marino et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065178 | Kelleher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071191 | Kelleher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077138 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097164 | Miles et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103601 | Biro et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080146885 | Protopsaltis | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183214 | Copp et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080221394 | Melkent et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080288077 | Reo et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300465 | Feigenwinter et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030519 | Falahee | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090124860 | Miles et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132049 | Carver et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138050 | Ferree | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138090 | Hurlbert et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090192403 | Gharib et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204016 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100069783 | Miles et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106251 | Kast | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100130827 | Pimenta et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100152603 | Miles et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160738 | Miles et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174146 | Miles | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174148 | Miles et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100228350 | Gornet et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110046448 | Paolitto et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110218631 | Woodburn, Sr. et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110313530 | Gharib et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120238822 | Miles et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238893 | Farquhar et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130331943 | Arnold et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140288374 | Miles et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288375 | Miles et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150150693 | Gharib et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150157227 | Kelleher et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150157228 | Marino et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150282948 | Arnold et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160120530 | Miles et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160174958 | Miles et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160174959 | Miles et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160192921 | Pimenta et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160374613 | Kaula et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170007421 | Curran et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170020503 | Miles et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170027712 | Pimenta et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
299 08 259 | Jul 1999 | DE |
10048790 | Oct 2000 | DE |
100 48 790 | Apr 2002 | DE |
0 334 116 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0 567 424 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0 972 538 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1 002 500 | May 2000 | EP |
2 795 624 | Jan 2001 | FR |
793186 | May 1990 | JP |
10-14928 | Mar 1996 | JP |
3019990007098 | Nov 1999 | KR |
9428824 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9700702 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9823324 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9952446 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0027291 | May 2000 | WO |
WO0027291 | May 2000 | WO |
0038574 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0044288 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0062660 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0066217 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0067645 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0108563 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0137728 | May 2001 | WO |
0160263 | Aug 2001 | WO |
02054960 | Jul 2002 | WO |
02058780 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02071953 | Sep 2002 | WO |
02087678 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03005887 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03026482 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03037170 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03084398 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2005013805 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005030318 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2006042241 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006066217 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2009055034 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2011059491 | May 2011 | WO |
WO2011059498 | May 2011 | WO |
WO2012026981 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO2012103254 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO2013028571 | Feb 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
INS-1 Guide, Dec. 31, 2000. |
Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine in MED TM MicroEndoscopic Discectomy (1997 Ludann Grand Rapids MI), 14 pgs. |
Dirksmeier et al., “Microendoscopic and Open Laminotomy and Discectomy in Lumbar Disc Disease” Seminars in Spine Surgery, 1999, 11(2): 138-146. |
METRx Delivered Order Form, 1999, 13 pages. |
Medtronic Sofamor Danek “METRx™ MicroDiscectomy System,” Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, 2000, 21 pgs. |
Medtronic Sofamor Danek “METRx System Surgical Technique,” 2004, 22 pages. |
“MetRx System MicroEndoscopic Discectomy: An Evolution in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery,” Sofamor Danek, 1999, 6 pages. |
Smith and Foley “MetRx System MicroEndoscopic Discectomy: Surgical Technique” Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2000, 24 pages. |
“Sofamor Danek MED Microendoscopic Discectomy System Brochure” including Rapp “New endoscopic lumbar technique improves access preserves tissue” Reprinted with permission from: Orthopedics Today, 1998, 18(1): 2 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office JP Patent Application No. 2006-528306 Office Action with English Translation, Jun. 10, 2009, 4 pages. |
Plaintiffs' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions re U.S. Pat. No. 7,207,949; U.S. Pat. No. 7,470,236 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,582,058, Sep. 18, 2009, 19 pages. |
Plaintiffs' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions-Appendices, Sep. 18, 2009, 191 pages. |
Plaintiffs' Supplemental Preliminary Invalidity Contentions re U.S. Pat. No. 7,207,949, U.S. Pat. No. 7,470,236, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,582,058, Sep. 29, 2009, 21 pages. |
Plaintiffs' Supplemental Preliminary Invalidity Contentions-Appendices, Sep. 29, 2009, 294 pages. |
Axon 501(k) Notification: Epoch 2000 Neurological Workstation, Dec. 3, 1997, 464 pages. |
Foley and Smith, “Microendoscopic Discectomy,” Techniques in Neurosurgery, 1997, 3(4):301-307. |
Medtronic Sofamor Danek “UNION™ / UNION-L™ Anterior & Lateral Impacted Fusion Devices: Clear choice of stabilization,” Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2000, 4 pages. |
NuVasive Vector™ Cannulae, 2000, 1 page. |
NuVasive Triad Triad™ Tri-Columnar Spinal EndoArthrodesis™ via Minimally Invasive Guidance, 2000, 1 page (prior to Sep. 25, 2003). |
NuVasive Triad™ Cortical Bone Allograft, 2000, 1 page (prior to Sep. 25, 2003). |
NuVasive Vertebral Body Access System, 2000, 1 page. |
Marina, “New Technology for Guided Navigation with Real Time Nerve Surveillance for Minimally Invasive Spine Discectomy & Arthrodesis,” Spineline, 2000, p. 39. |
NuVasive “INS-1 Screw Test,” 2001, 10 pages. |
NuVasive letter re 510k Neuro Vision JJB System, Oct. 16, 2001, 5 pages. |
NuVasive letter re 510k Guided Arthroscopy System, Oct. 5, 1999, 6 pages. |
NuVasive letter re 510k INS-1 Intraoperative Nerve Surveillance System, Nov. 13, 2000, 7 pages. |
“NuVasive™ Receives Clearance to Market Two Key Elem Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery System,” Nov. 27, 2001, 20 pages. |
Schick et al., “Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study,” Eur Spine J, 2002, 11: 20-26. |
NuVasive letter re: 510(k) for Neurovision JJB System (Summary), Sep. 25, 2001, 28 pages. |
NuVasive letter re: Special 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), Jul. 3, 2003, 18 pages. |
NuVasive letter re: Special 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), Mar. 1, 2004, 16 pages. |
NuVasive letter re: Special 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), May 26, 2005, 17 pages. |
NuVasive letter re: 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), Jun. 24, 2005, 16 pages. |
NuVasive letter re: Special 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), Sep. 14, 2006, 17 pages. |
NuVasive 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), Aug. 20, 2007, 8 pages. |
NuVasive letter re: 510(k) Premarket Notification: Guided Spinal Arthroscopy System (Device Description), Feb. 1, 1999, 40 pages. |
NuVasive 510(k) Premarket Notification: Spinal System (Summary), Apr. 12, 2004, 10 pages. |
NuVasive 510(k) Summary NIM Monitor, Sep. 4, 1998, 4 pages. |
NuVasive correspondence re 510(k) Premarket Notification INS-1 Intraoperative Nerve Surveillance System: Section IV Device Description, pp. 12-51 (prior to Sep. 25, 2003). |
Isley et al., “Recent Advances in Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of Spinal Cord Function: Pedicle Screw Stimulation Techniques,” American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology, Jun. 1997, 37(2):93-126. |
Mathews et al., “Laparoscopic Discectomy with Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” SPINE, 1995, 20(16): 1797-1802. |
Rose et al., “Persistently Electrified Pedicle Stimulation Instruments in Spinal Instrumentation: Techniques and Protocol Development,” SPINE, 1997, 22(3): 334-343. |
“Electromyography System,” International Search report from International Application No. PCT/US00/32329, Apr. 27, 2001, 9 pages. |
“Nerve Proximity and Status Detection System and Method,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US01/18606, Oct. 18, 2001, 6 pages. |
“Relative Nerve Movement and Status Detection System and Method,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US01/18579, Jan. 15, 2002, 6 pages. |
“System and Method for Determining Nerve Proximity Direction and Pathology During Surgery,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US02/22247, Mar. 27, 2003, 4 pages. |
“System and Methods for Determining Nerve Direction to a Surgical Instrument,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US03/02056, Aug. 12, 2003, 5 pages. |
“Systems and Methods for Performing Percutaneous Pedicle Integrity Assessments,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US02/35047, Aug. 11, 2003, 5 pages. |
“Systems and Methods for Performing Surgery Procedures and Assessments,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US02/30617, Jun. 5, 2003, 4 pages. |
Lenke et al., “Triggered Electromyographic Threshold for Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement,” Spine, 1995, 20(4): 1585-1591. |
“Brackmann II EMG System,” Medical Electronics, 1999, 4 pages. |
“Neurovision SE Nerve Locator/Monitor”, RLN Systems Inc. Operators Manual, 1999, 22 pages. |
“The Brackmann II EMG Monitoring System,” Medical Electronics Co. Operator's Manual Version 1.1, 1995, 50 pages. |
“The Nicolet Viking IV,” Nicolet Biomedical Products, 1999, 6 pages. |
Anderson et al., “Pedicle screws with high electrical resistance: a potential source of error with stimulus-evoked EMG,” Spine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Virginia, Jul. 15, 2002, 27(14): 1577-1581. |
Bose et al., “Neurophysiologic Monitoring of Spinal Nerve Root Function During Instrumented Posterior Lumber Spine Surgery,” Spine, 2002, 27(13):1444-1450. |
Calancie et al., “Stimulus-Evoked EMG Monitoring During Transpedicular Lumbosacral Spine Instrumentation” Spine, 1994, 19(24): 2780-2786. |
Clements et al., “Evoked and Spontaneous Electromyography to Evaluate Lumbosacral Pedicle Screw Placement,” Spine, 1996, 21(5): 600-604. |
Danesh-Clough et al. ,“The Use of Evoked EMG in Detecting Misplaced Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screws,” Spine, Orthopaedic Department Dunedin Hospital, Jun. 15, 2001, 26(12): 1313-1316. |
Darden et al., “A Comparison of Impedance and Electromyogram Measurements in Detecting the Presence of Pedicle Wall Breakthrough,” Spine, Charlotte Spine Center North Carolina, Jan. 15, 1998, 23(2): 256-262. |
Ebraheim et al., “Anatomic Relations Between the Lumbar Pedicle and the Adjacent Neural Structures,” Spine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Medical College of Ohio, Oct. 15, 1997, 22(20): 2338-2341. |
Ford et al. “Electrical Characteristics of Peripheral Nerve Stimulators Implications for Nerve Localization,” Regional Anesthesia, 1984, 9: 73-77. |
Glassman et al., “A Prospective Analysis of Intraoperative Electromyographic Monitoring of Pedicle Screw Placement With Computed Tomographic Scan Confirmation,” Spine, 1995, 20(12): 1375-1379. |
Greenblatt et al., “Needle Nerve Stimulator-Locator: Nerve Blocks with a New Instrument for Locating Nerves,” Anesthesia& Analgesia, 1962, 41(5): 599-602. |
Haig, “Point of view,” Spine, 2002, 27(24): 2819. |
Haig et al., “The Relation Among Spinal Geometry on MRI, Paraspinal Electromyographic Abnormalities, and Age in Persons Referred for Electrodiagnostic Testing of Low Back Symptoms,” Spine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Michigan, Sep. 1, 2002, 27(17): 1918-1925. |
Holland et al., “Higher Electrical Stimulus Intensities are Required to Activate Chronically Compressed Nerve Roots: Implications for Intraoperative Electromyographic Pedicle Screw Testing,” Spine, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Jan. 15, 1998, 23(2): 224-227. |
Holland, “Intraoperative Electromyography During Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery,” Spine, 1998, 23(17): 1915-1922. |
Journee et al., “System for Intra-Operative Monitoring of the Cortical Intgegrity of the Pedicle During Pedicle Screw Placement in Low-Back Surgery: Design and Clinical Results,” Sensory and Neuromuscular Diagnostic Instrumentation and Data Analysis I, 18th Annual International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 144-145. |
Maguire et al., “Evaluation of Intrapedicular Screw Position Using Intraoperative Evoked Electromyography,” Spine, 1995, 20(9): 1068-1074. |
Martin et al. “Initiation of Erection and Semen Release by Rectal Probe Electrostimulation (RPE),” The Journal of Urology, The Williams& Wilkins Co., 1983, 129: 637-642. |
Minahan et al., “The Effect of Neuromuscular Blockade on Pedicle Screw Stimulation Thresholds” Spine, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Oct. 1, 2000, 25(19): 2526-2530. |
Pither et al., “The Use of Peripheral Nerve Stimulators for Regional Anesthesia: Review of Experimental Characteristics Technique and Clinical Applications,” Regional Anesthesia, 1985, 10:49-58. |
Raj et al., “Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block—A New Approach” Anesthesia and Analgesia, 1973, (52)6: 897-904. |
Raj et al., “The Use of Peripheral Nerve Stimulators for Regional Anesthesia,” Clinical Issues in Regional Anesthesia, 1985, 1(4):1-6. |
Raj et al., “Use of the Nerve Stimulator for Peripheral Blocks,” Regional Anesthesia, Apr.-Jun. 1980, pp. 14-21. |
Raymond et al., “The Nerve Seeker: A System for Automated Nerve Localization,” Regional Anesthesia, 1992, 17(3): 151-162. |
Shafik, “Cavernous Nerve Simulation through an Extrapelvic Subpubic Approach: Role in Penile Erection,” Eur. Urol, 1994, 26: 98-102. |
Toleikis et al., “The Usefulness of Electrical Stimulation for Assessing Pedicle Screw Replacements,” Journal of Spinal Disorder, 2000, 13(4): 283-289. |
Medtronic Sofamor Danek “UNION™ / UNION-L™ Anterior & Lacteral Impacted Fusion Devices: Surgical Technique” Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2001, 20 pages. |
Defendant's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 7,207,949; U.S. Pat. No. 7,470,236 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,582,058, Aug. 31, 2009, 21 pages. |
Bergey et al., “Endoscopic Lateral Transpsoas Approach to the Lumbar Spine,” Spine, 2004, 29(15): 1681-1688. |
Dezawa et al., “Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Lateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine: A New Approach, Technique, and Clinical Trial,” Journal of Spinal Disorders, 2000, 13(2): 138-143. |
Gardocki, “Tubular diskectomy minimizes collateral damage: A logical progression moves spine surgery forward,” AAOS Now, 2009, 5 pages. |
Hovorka et al., “Five years' experience of retroperitoneal lumbar and thoracolumbar surgery,” Eur Spine J., 2000, 9(1): S30-S34. |
Kossmann et al., “The use of a retractor system (SynFrame) for open, minimal invasive reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracic and lumbar spine,” Eur Spine J., 2001, 10: 396-402. |
Mayer, “A New Microsurgical Technique for Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Spine, 1997, 22(6): 691-699. |
Mayer, “The ALIF Concept,” Eur Spine J., 2000, 9(1): S35-S43. |
Mayer and Wiechert, “Microsurgical Anterior Approaches to the Lumbar Spine for Interbody Fusion and Total Disc Replacement,” Neurosurgery, 2002, 51(2): 159-165. |
McAfee et al., “Minimally Invasive Anterior Retroperitoneal Approach to the Lumbar Spine: Emphasis on the Lateral BAK,” Spine, 1998, 23(13): 1476-1484. |
Rao, et al. “Dynamic retraction of the psoas muscle to expose the lumbar spine using the retroperitoneal approach,” J. Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 5: 468-470. |
Wolfla et al., “Retroperitoneal lateral lumbar interbody fusion with titanium threaded fusion cages,” J. Neurosurg (Spine 1), 2002, 96: 50-55. |
Larson and Maiman, “Surgery of the Lumbar Spine,” Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 1999, pp. 305-319. |
Medtronic XOMED Surgical Products, Inc., NIM-Response Nerve Integrity Monitor Intraoperative EMG Monitor User's Guide, Revision B, 2000, 47 pages. |
“NuVasive's spine surgery system cleared in the US,” Pharm & Medical Industry Week, Dec. 10, 2001, 1 page. |
Pimenta, “Initial Clinical Results of Direct Lateral, Minimally Invasive Access to the Lumbar Spine for Disc Nucleus Replacement Using a Novel Neurophysiological Monitoring System.” The 9th IMAST, May 2002, 1 page. |
Pimenta et al., “The Lateral Endoscopic Transpsoas Retroperitoneal Approach (Letra) for Implants in the Lumbar Spine,” World Spine II—Second Interdisciplinary Congress on Spine Care, Aug. 2003, 2 pages. |
Crock, H.V. MD., “Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. One Hundred Sixty Five, 1982, pp. 157-163, 13 pages. |
Mayer and Brock, “Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy,” J. Neurosurg, 1993, 78: 216-225. |
Schaffer and Kambin, “Percutaneous Posterolateral Lumbar Discectomy and Decompression with a 6.9-Millimeter Cannula,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1991, 73A(6): 822-831. |
Friedman, “Percutaneous discectomy: An alternative to chemonucleolysis,” Neurosurgery, 1983, 13(5): 542-547. |
Request for Inter PartesReexamination in re U.S. Pat. No. 7,905,840, dated Feb. 8, 2012, 204 pages. |
Brau, “Chapter 22: Anterior Retroperitoneal Muscle-Sparing approach to L2-S1 of the Lumbar Spine,” Surgical Approaches to the Spine. Robert G. Watkins, MD. (ed) 2003. pp. 165-181. |
Kossmann et al., “Minimally Invasive Vertebral Replacement with Cages in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine,” European Journal of Trauma, 2001, 27: 292-300. |
Mayer H. M. (ed.) Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Surgical Manual. 2000. 51 pages. |
Pimenta et al., “Implante de protese de nucleo pulposo: analise inicial,” Journal Brasileiro de Neurocirurgia, 2001, 12(2): 93-96. |
Traynelis, “Spinal Arthroplasty,” Neurological Focus, 2002, 13(2): 12 pages. |
Zdeblick, Thomas A. (ed.). Anterior Approaches to the Spine. 1999. 43 pages. |
Amended Complaint for NuVasive, Inc. v. Globus Medical, Inc., Case No. 1:10-cv-0849 (D. Del., Oct. 5, 2010), 28 pages. |
Request for Inter PartesReexamination In re U.S. Pat. No. 7,819,801, dated Feb. 8, 2012, 89 pages. |
Kossman et al., “The use of a retractor system (SynFrame) for open, minimal invasive reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracic and lumbar spine,” Eur Spine J, 2001, 10: 396-402. |
De Peretti et al., “New possibilities in L2-L5 lumbar arthrodesis using a lateral retroperitoneal approach assisted by laparoscopy: preliminary results,” Eur Spine J, 1996, 5: 210-216. |
Litwin et al., “Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the handport system,” Annals of Surgery, 2000, 231(5): 715-723. |
Acland's Video Atlas of Human Anatomy, Section 3.1.7: Paravertebral Muscles. Available online: http://aclandanatomy.com/abstract/4010463. Accessed Jul. 11, 2012. |
MedlinePlus, a Service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health. Available online: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/. Accessed Jul. 11, 2012. |
Baulot et al., Adjuvant Anterior Spinal Fusion Via Thoracoscopy, Lyon Chirurgical, 1994, 90(5): 347-351 including English Translation and Certificate of Translation. |
Leu et al., “Percutaneous Fusion of the Lumbar Spine,” Spine, 1992, 6(3): 593-604. |
Rosenthal et al., “Removal of a Protruded Thoracic Disc Using Microsurgical Endoscopy,” Spine, 1994, 19(9): 1087-1091. |
Counterclaim Defendants' Corrected Amended Invalidity Contentions re U.S. Pat. No. 8,000,782; U.S. Pat. No. 8,005,535; U.S. Pat. No. 8,016,767; U.S. Pat. No. 8,192,356; U.S. Pat. No. 8,187,334; U.S. Pat. No. 8,361,156, U.S. Pat. No. D. 652,922; U.S. Pat. No. D. 666,294 re Case No. 3:12-cv-02738-CAB(MDD), dated Aug. 19, 2013, 30 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00034, filed Oct. 8, 2013, 65 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00035, filed Oct. 8, 2013, 65 pages. |
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-00034, Oct. 7, 2013, 36 pages. |
Declaration of David Hacker from IPR2014-00034, Oct. 4, 2013, 64 pages. |
NuVasive, Inc's Opening Claim Construction Brief Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,000,782; U.S. Pat. No. 8,005,535; U.S. Pat. No. 8,016,767; U.S. Pat. No. 8,192,356; U.S. Pat. No. 8,187,334; U.S. Pat. No. 8,361,156; U.S. Pat. No. D. 652,922; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,676,146 C2, filed Sep. 3, 2013, in Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., No. 3:12-cv-02738-CAB-MDD (S.D. Cal.)., 34 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00073, filed Oct. 18, 2013, 65 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00074, filed Oct. 18, 2013, 65 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00075, filed Oct. 21, 2013, 66 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00076, filed Oct. 21, 2013, 65 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00081, filed Oct. 22, 2013, 64 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00087, filed Oct. 22, 2013, 64 pages. |
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-00073, Oct. 9, 2013, 36 pages. |
Declaration of David Hacker, from IPR2014-00073, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/392,214, filed Jun. 26, 2002, 97 pages. |
Amendment in reply to Feb. 15, 2012 Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,418, dated Mar. 16, 2012, 24 pages. |
Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination Control No. 95/001,247, dated Mar. 18, 2013, 49 pages. |
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-00074, Oct. 9, 2013, 36 pages. |
Declaration of David Hacker, from IPR2014-00074, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages. |
Declaration of David Hacker, from IPR2014-00075, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages. |
Amendment in reply to Action of Feb. 7, 2011 and Notice of May 12, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,284, dated May 17, 2011, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,284, dated Jul. 18, 2011, 8 pages. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,284, dated Feb. 7, 2011, 10 pages. |
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, p. 65 (10th ed. 1998). |
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-00076, Oct. 9, 2013, 36 pages. |
Moed et al., “Evaluation of Intraoperative Nerve-Monitoring During Insertion of an Iliosacral Implant in an Animal Model, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,” 1999, 81-A(11): 9. |
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-0081, Oct. 9, 2013, 36 pages. |
Declaration of David Hacker from IPR2014-00081, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/325,424, filed Sep. 25, 2001, 346 pages. |
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-0087, Oct. 9, 2013, 36 pages. |
Declaration of David Hacker from IPR2014-00087, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages. |
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination In re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,691,057, dated Feb. 8, 2012, 50 pages. |
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, Ph.D. from IPR2014-00034, Oct. 7, 2013, 1056 pages. |
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, Ph.D. from IPR2014-00035, Oct. 7, 2013, 661 pages. |
510(K) No. K002677, approved by the FDA on Nov. 13, 2000, 634 pages. |
510(K) No. K013215, approved by the FDA on Oct. 16, 2001, 376 pages. |
Declaration of Robert G. Watkins, from IPR2014-00073, Oct. 18, 2013, 1101 pages. |
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, from IPR2014-00073, Oct. 12, 2013, 1226 pages. |
Declaration of Robert G. Watkins, from IPR2014-00074, Oct. 18, 2013, 548 pages. |
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, from IPR2014-00074, Oct. 12, 2013, 565 pages. |
Declaration of Robert G. Watkins, from IPR2014-00075, Oct. 18, 2013, 674 pages. |
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, from IPR2014-00075, Oct. 12, 2013, 1107 pages. |
Declaration of Robert G. Watkins, from IPR2014-00076, Oct. 18, 2013, 543 pages. |
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, from IPR2014-00076, Oct. 12, 2013, 1247 pages. |
Declaration of David Hacker, from IPR2014-00076, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages. |
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, from IPR2014-0081, Oct. 21, 2013, 585 pages. |
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz from IPR2014-0087, Oct. 21, 2013, 585 pages. |
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00034, dated Jan. 15, 2014, 66 pages. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00034, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 35 pages. |
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00035, dated Jan. 15, 2014, 42 pages. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00035, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 12 pages. |
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00073, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 46 pages. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00073, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 34 pages. |
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00074, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 68 pages. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00074, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 28 pages. |
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00075, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 54 pages. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00075, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 23 pages. |
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00076, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 58 pages. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00076, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 11 pages. |
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00081, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 47 pages. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00081, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 31 pages. |
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00087, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 51 pages. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00087, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 31 pages. |
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00034, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 48 pages. |
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00073, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 36 pages. |
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00074, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 31 pages. |
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00075, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 39 pages. |
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00081, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 44 pages. |
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00087, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,854, Miles et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/448,395, Miles; Patrick. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/498,296, Arnold; Benjamin. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/424,492, Gharib; James E. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/424,612, Gharib; James E. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/439,889, Miles; Patrick. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 90/013,464, Warsaw Orthopedic; Inc. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,888, Nuvasive; Inc. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,890, Nuvasive; Inc. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 90/013,546, Warsaw Orthopedic; Inc. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 90/013,605, Nuvasive; Inc. et al. |
European Search Report dated Apr. 7, 2015 for EP Application No. 12826211.0. |
European Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2012 for EP Application No. 12001129.1. |
European Search Report dated Sep. 28, 2009 for EP Application No. 02778359.6. |
In re: NuVasive, Inc. in 15-1670 filed May 20, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
In re: NuVasive, Inc. in 15-1672 filed May 26, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
In re: NuVasive, Inc. in 15-1673 filed May 26, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
In re: NuVasive, Inc. in 15-1838 filed Jul. 16, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
In re: NuVasive, Inc. in 15-1839 filed Jul. 16, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
In re: NuVasive, Inc. in 15-1840 filed Jul. 16, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
In re: NuVasive, Inc. in 15-1841 filed Jul. 16, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
In re: NuVasive, Inc. in 15-1842 filed Jul. 16, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
In re: NuVasive, Inc. in 15-1843 filed Jul. 16, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
In re: Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. in 15-1050 filed Oct. 14, 2014, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
In re: Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. in 15-1058 filed Oct. 17, 2014, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 12, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/002960. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2005 for International Application PCT/US2004/031768. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 24, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/022600. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 29, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/051480. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 13, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/001489. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 24, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2008/012121. |
International Search Report dated Mar. 23, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/002951. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 12, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/272,071. |
NuVasive, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. in 15-1674 filed May 26, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
NuVasive, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. in 15-1712 filed Jun. 8, 2015, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
NuVasive, Inc. v. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. in 15-1049 filed Oct. 14, 2014, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,185. |
Office Action dated Jan. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/489,020. |
Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,185. |
Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/622,585. |
Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/489,020. |
Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/448,395. |
Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,854. |
Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/439,889. |
Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/059,215. |
Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,185. |
Office Action dated May 6, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/489,020. |
Office Action dated May 8, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,836. |
Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,185. |
Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/489,020. |
Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/622,585. |
Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/489,020. |
Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,369. |
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/994,640. |
Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,438. |
Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,836. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by Medtronic, Inc. in IPR2013-00504 filed Aug. 14, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by Medtronic, Inc. in IPR2013-00506 filed Aug. 14, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by Medtronic, Inc. in IPR2013-00507 filed Aug. 14, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by Medtronic, Inc. in IPR2013-00508 filed Aug. 14, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by Medtronic, Inc. in IPR2014-00071 filed Oct. 16, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by Medtronic, Inc. in IPR2014-00487 filed Mar. 5, 2014, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by NuVasive, Inc. in IPR2013-00206 filed Mar. 22, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by NuVasive, Inc. in IPR2013-00208 filed Mar. 22, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by NuVasive, Inc. in IPR2013-00395 filed Jun. 27, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by NuVasive, Inc. in IPR2013-00396 filed Jun. 27, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review by NuVasive, Inc. in IPR2015-00502 filed Dec. 24, 2014, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc. in 12-1263 filed Mar. 15, 2012, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc. in 12-1266 filed Mar. 15, 2012, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc. in 13-1576 filed Aug. 21, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc. in 13-1577 filed Aug. 21, 2013, Individual documents of the referenced court case are not being submitted herewith, as Applicant understands the documents to be readily accessible by the Examiner. However, Applicant can provide any of the documents upon request. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140235950 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60392214 | Jun 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13757035 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 14263797 | US | |
Parent | 13466398 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 13757035 | US | |
Parent | 12649604 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13466398 | US | |
Parent | 12635418 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 12649604 | US | |
Parent | 12428081 | Apr 2009 | US |
Child | 12635418 | US | |
Parent | 10608362 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 12428081 | US |