Surgical access system and related methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9468405
  • Patent Number
    9,468,405
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 3, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 18, 2016
    7 years ago
Abstract
A surgical access system including a tissue distraction assembly and a tissue refraction assembly, both of which may be equipped with one or more electrodes for use in detecting the existence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures before, during, and after the establishment of an operative corridor to a surgical target site.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

I. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to systems and methods for performing surgical procedures and, more particularly, for accessing a surgical target site in order to perform surgical procedures.


II. Discussion of the Prior Art


A noteworthy trend in the medical community is the move away from performing surgery via traditional “open” techniques in favor of minimally invasive or minimal access techniques. Open surgical techniques are generally undesirable in that they typically require large incisions and high amounts of tissue displacement to gain access to the surgical target site, which produces concomitantly high amounts of pain, lengthened hospitalization (increasing health care costs), and high morbidity in the patient population. Less-invasive surgical techniques (including so-called “minimal access” and “minimally invasive” techniques) are gaining favor due to the fact that they involve accessing the surgical target site via incisions of substantially smaller size with greatly reduced tissue displacement requirements. This, in turn, reduces the pain, morbidity and cost associated with such procedures. The access systems developed to date, however, fail in various respects to meet all the needs of the surgeon population.


One drawback associated with prior art surgical access systems relates to the ease with which the operative corridor can be created, as well as maintained over time, depending upon the particular surgical target site. For example, when accessing surgical target sites located beneath or behind musculature or other relatively strong tissue (such as, by way of example only, the psoas muscle adjacent to the spine), it has been found that advancing an operative corridor-establishing instrument directly through such tissues can be challenging and/or lead to unwanted or undesirable effects (such as stressing or tearing the tissues). While certain efforts have been undertaken to reduce the trauma to tissue while creating an operative corridor, such as (by way of example only) the sequential dilation system of U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,044 to Foley et al., these attempts are nonetheless limited in their applicability based on the relatively narrow operative corridor. More specifically, based on the generally cylindrical nature of the so-called “working cannula,” the degree to which instruments can be manipulated and/or angled within the cannula can be generally limited or restrictive, particularly if the surgical target site is a relatively deep within the patient.


Efforts have been undertaken to overcome this drawback, such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,524,320 to DiPoto, wherein an expandable portion is provided at the distal end of a cannula for creating a region of increased cross-sectional area adjacent to the surgical target site. While this system may provide for improved instrument manipulation relative to sequential dilation access systems (at least at deep sites within the patient), it is nonetheless flawed in that the deployment of the expandable portion may inadvertently compress or impinge upon sensitive tissues adjacent to the surgical target site. For example, in anatomical regions having neural and/or vasculature structures, such a blind expansion may cause the expandable portion to impinge upon these sensitive tissues and cause neural and/or vasculature compromise, damage and/or pain for the patient.


This highlights yet another drawback with the prior art surgical access systems, namely, the challenges in establishing an operative corridor through or near tissue having major neural structures which, if contacted or impinged, may result in neural impairment for the patient. Due to the threat of contacting such neural structures, efforts thus far have largely restricted to establishing operative corridors through tissue having little or substantially reduced neural structures, which effectively limits the number of ways a given surgical target site can be accessed. This can be seen, by way of example only, in the spinal arts, where the exiting nerve roots and neural plexus structures in the psoas muscle have rendered a lateral or far lateral access path (so-called trans-psoas approach) to the lumbar spine virtually impossible. Instead, spine surgeons are largely restricted to accessing the spine from the posterior (to perform, among other procedures, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)) or from the anterior (to perform, among other procedures, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)).


Posterior-access procedures involve traversing a shorter distance within the patient to establish the operative corridor, albeit at the price of oftentimes having to reduce or cut away part of the posterior bony structures (i.e. lamina, facets, spinous process) in order to reach the target site (which typically comprises the disc space). Anterior-access procedures are relatively simple for surgeons in that they do not involve reducing or cutting away bony structures to reach the surgical target site. However, they are nonetheless disadvantageous in that they require traversing through a much greater distance within the patient to establish the operative corridor, oftentimes requiring an additional surgeon to assist with moving the various internal organs out of the way to create the operative corridor.


The present invention is directed at eliminating, or at least minimizing the effects of, the above-identified drawbacks in the prior art.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention accomplishes this goal by providing a novel access system and related methods which involve detecting the existence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures before, during, and after the establishment of an operative corridor through (or near) any of a variety of tissues having such neural structures which, if contacted or impinged, may otherwise result in neural impairment for the patient. It is expressly noted that, although described herein largely in terms of use in spinal surgery, the access system of the present invention is suitable for use in any number of additional surgical procedures wherein tissue having significant neural structures must be passed through (or near) in order to establish an operative corridor.


According to one broad aspect of the present invention, the access system comprises a tissue distraction assembly and a tissue retraction assembly, both of which may be equipped with one or more electrodes for use in detecting the existence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures. The tissue distraction assembly (in conjunction with one or more elements of the tissue retraction assembly) is capable of, as an initial step, distracting a region of tissue between the skin of the patient and the surgical target site. The tissue retraction assembly is capable of, as a secondary step, being introduced into this distracted region to thereby define and establish the operative corridor. Once established, any of a variety of surgical instruments, devices, or implants may be passed through and/or manipulated within the operative corridor depending upon the given surgical procedure. The electrode(s) are capable of, during both tissue distraction and retraction, detecting the existence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures such that the operative corridor may be established through (or near) any of a variety of tissues having such neural structures which, if contacted or impinged, may otherwise result in neural impairment for the patient. In this fashion, the access system of the present invention may be used to traverse tissue that would ordinarily be deemed unsafe or undesirable, thereby broadening the number of manners in which a given surgical target site may be accessed.


The tissue distraction assembly may include any number of components capable of performing the necessary distraction. By way of example only, the tissue distraction assembly may include a K-wire, an initial dilator of split construction, and one or more dilators of traditional (that is, non-split) construction for performing the necessary tissue distraction to receive the remainder of the tissue retractor assembly thereafter. One or more electrodes may be provided on one or more of the K-wire and dilator(s) to detect the presence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures during tissue distraction.


The tissue retraction assembly may include any number of components capable of performing the necessary retraction. By way of example only, the tissue retraction assembly may include one or more retractor blades extending from a handle assembly. The handle assembly may be manipulated to open the retractor assembly; that is, allowing the retractor blades to separate from one another simultaneously to create an operative corridor to the surgical target site. In a preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by maintaining a posterior retractor blade in a fixed position relative to the surgical target site (so as to avoid having it impinge upon any exiting nerve roots near the posterior elements of the spine) while the additional retractor blades (i.e. cephalad-most and caudal-most blades) are moved or otherwise translated away from the posterior retractor blade (and each other) so as to create the operative corridor in a fashion that doesn't infringe upon the region of the exiting nerve roots.


The retractor blades may be optionally dimensioned to receive and direct a rigid shim element to augment the structural stability of the retractor blades and thereby ensure the operative corridor, once established, will not decrease or become more restricted, such as may result if distal ends of the retractor blades were permitted to “slide” or otherwise move in response to the force exerted by the displaced tissue. In a preferred embodiment, only the posterior retractor blade is equipped with such a rigid shim element. In an optional aspect, this shim element may be advanced into the disc space after the posterior retractor blade is positioned, but before the retractor is opened into the fully retracted position. The rigid shim element is preferably oriented within the disc space such that is distracts the adjacent vertebral bodies, which serves to restore disc height. It also preferably advances a sufficient distance within the disc space (preferably past the midline), which serves the dual purpose of preventing post-operative scoliosis and forming a protective barrier (preventing the migration of tissue (such as nerve roots) into the operative field and the inadvertent advancement of instruments outside the operative field).


The retractor blades may optionally be equipped with a mechanism for transporting or emitting light at or near the surgical target site to aid the surgeon's ability to visualize the surgical target site, instruments and/or implants during the given surgical procedure. According to one embodiment, this mechanism may comprise, but need not be limited to, providing one or more strands of fiber optic cable within the walls of the retractor blades such that the terminal (distal) ends are capable of emitting light at or near the surgical target site. According to another embodiment, this mechanism may comprise, but need not be limited to, constructing the retractor blades of suitable material (such as clear polycarbonate) and configuration such that light may be transmitted generally distally through the walls of the retractor blade light to shine light at or near the surgical target site. This may be performed by providing the retractor blades having light-transmission characteristics (such as with clear polycarbonate construction) and transmitting the light almost entirely within the walls of the retractor blade (such as by frosting or otherwise rendering opaque portions of the exterior and/or interior) until it exits a portion along the interior (or medially-facing) surface of the retractor blade to shine at or near the surgical target site. The exit portion may be optimally configured such that the light is directed towards the approximate center of the surgical target site and may be provided along the entire inner periphery of the retractor blade or one or more portions therealong.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Many advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art with a reading of this specification in conjunction with the attached drawings, wherein like reference numerals are applied to like elements and wherein:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tissue retraction assembly (in use) forming part of a surgical access system according to the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a perspective view illustrating the components and use of an initial distraction assembly (i.e. K-wire, an initial dilating cannula with handle, and a split-dilator housed within the initial dilating cannula) forming part of the surgical access system according to the present invention, for use in distracting to a surgical target site (i.e. annulus);



FIG. 3 is a perspective view illustrating the K-wire and split-dilator of the initial distraction assembly with the initial dilating cannula and handle removed;



FIG. 4 is a posterior view of the vertebral target site illustrating the split-dilator of the present invention in use distracting in a generally cephalad-caudal fashion according to one aspect of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a side view illustrating the use of a secondary distraction assembly (comprising a plurality of dilating cannulae over the K-wire) to further distract tissue between the skin of the patient and the surgical target site according to the present invention;



FIGS. 6-7 are perspective and side views, respectively, of a retractor assembly according to the present invention, comprising a handle assembly having three (3) retractor blades extending there from (posterior, cephalad-most, and caudal-most) disposed over the secondary distraction assembly of FIG. 5 (shown in a first, closed position);



FIGS. 8-10 are perspective, side and top views, respectively, of the retractor assembly of FIGS. 6-7 in a second, opened (i.e. retracted) position (over the secondary distraction assembly) to thereby create an operative corridor to a surgical target site according to the present invention;



FIGS. 11-13 are perspective, side and top views, respectively, of the retractor assembly of FIGS. 6-7 in the second, opened (i.e. refracted) position (with the secondary distraction assembly removed) illustrating the operative corridor to the surgical target site according to the present invention;



FIG. 14 is an enlarged perspective view of the interior surface of a retractor blade, illustrating a pair of dove-tail grooves dimensioned to engage a shim element (as shown in FIG. 15) and/or a retractor extender (as shown in FIG. 16) according to the present invention;



FIG. 15 is a perspective view of a shim element dimensioned to be adjustably and removably coupled to a retractor blade (as shown in FIG. 14) according to the present invention;



FIG. 16 is a perspective view of a retractor extender dimensioned to be adjustably and removably coupled to a retractor blade (as shown in FIG. 14) according to the present invention;



FIGS. 17-18 are perspective and side views, respectively, of the retractor assembly illustrating the use of an introducer device for coupling the shim element of FIG. 15 to the posterior retractor blade and introducing the distal end of the shim (shim extension) into the intradiscal space according to the present invention;



FIGS. 19-21 are perspective, side and top views, respectively, of the retractor assembly illustrating the shim element after introduction according to the present invention;



FIG. 22 is a side view of the retractor assembly illustrating the shim element and one of two retractor extenders after introduction according to the present invention;



FIG. 23 is a perspective view of an exemplary nerve monitoring system capable of performing nerve monitoring before, during and after the creating of an operative corridor to a surgical target site using the surgical access system in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 24 is a block diagram of the nerve monitoring system shown in FIG. 23; and



FIGS. 25-26 are screen displays illustrating exemplary features and information communicated to a user during the use of the nerve monitoring system of FIG. 23.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. It is furthermore to be readily understood that, although discussed below primarily within the context of spinal surgery, the surgical access system of the present invention may be employed in any number of anatomical settings to provide access to any number of different surgical target sites throughout the body. The surgical access system disclosed herein boasts a variety of inventive features and components that warrant patent protection, both individually and in combination.


The present invention involves accessing a surgical target site in a fashion less invasive than traditional “open” surgeries and doing so in a manner that provides access in spite of the neural structures required to be passed through (or near) in order to establish an operative corridor to the surgical target site. Generally speaking, the surgical access system of the present invention accomplishes this by providing a tissue distraction assembly and a tissue retraction assembly, both of which may be equipped with one or more electrodes for use in detecting the existence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures.


These electrodes are preferably provided for use with a nerve surveillance system such as, by way of example, the type shown and described in co-pending and commonly assigned Int'l Patent Application Ser. No. filed Sep. 25, 2002 (claiming priority to U.S. Provisional App. Ser. No. 60/325,424 filed on Sep. 25, 2001), the entire contents of which are expressly incorporated by reference as if set forth herein in their entirety (“the '424 PCT”). Generally speaking, this nerve surveillance system is capable of detecting the existence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures during the distraction and retraction of tissue by detecting the presence of nerves by applying a stimulation signal to such instruments and monitoring the evoked EMG signals from the myotomes associated with the nerves being passed by the distraction and retraction systems of the present invention. In so doing, the system as a whole (including the surgical access system of the present invention) may be used to form an operative corridor through (or near) any of a variety of tissues having such neural structures, particularly those which, if contacted or impinged, may otherwise result in neural impairment for the patient. In this fashion, the access system of the present invention may be used to traverse tissue that would ordinarily be deemed unsafe or undesirable, thereby broadening the number of manners in which a given surgical target site may be accessed.


The tissue distraction assembly of the present invention (comprising a K-wire, an initial dilator, and a split-dilator disposed within the initial dilator) is employed to distract the tissues extending between the skin of the patient and a given surgical target site (preferably along the posterior region of the target intervertebral disc). A secondary distraction assembly (i.e. a plurality of sequentially dilating cannulae) may optionally be employed after the initial distraction assembly to further distract the tissue. Once distracted, the resulting void or distracted region within the patient is of sufficient size to accommodate a tissue retraction assembly of the present invention. More specifically, the tissue retraction assembly (comprising a plurality of retractor blades extending from a handle assembly) may be advanced relative to the secondary distraction assembly such that the retractor blades, in a first, closed position, are advanced over the exterior of the secondary distraction assembly. At that point, the handle assembly may be operated to move the retractor blades into a second, open or “retracted” position to create an operative corridor to the surgical target site.


According to one aspect of the invention, following (or before) this retraction, a posterior shim element (which is preferably slideably engaged with the posterior retractor blade) may be advanced such that a distal shim extension in positioned within the posterior region of the disc space. If done before retraction, this helps ensure that the posterior retractor blade will not move posteriorly during the retraction process, even though the other retractor blades (i.e. cephalad-most and caudal-most) are able to move and thereby create an operative corridor. Fixing the posterior retractor blade in this fashion serves several important functions. First, the distal end of the shim element serves to distract the adjacent vertebral bodies, thereby restoring disc height. It also rigidly couples the posterior retractor blade in fixed relation relative to the vertebral bodies. The posterior shim element also helps ensure that surgical instruments employed within the operative corridor are incapable of being advanced outside the operative corridor, preventing inadvertent contact with the exiting nerve roots during the surgery. Once in the appropriate retracted state, the cephalad-most and caudal-most retractor blades may be locked in position and, thereafter, retractor extenders advanced therealong to prevent the ingress or egress of instruments or biological structures (i.e. nerves, vasculature, etc. . . . ) into or out of the operative corridor. Once the operative corridor is established, any of a variety of surgical instruments, devices, or implants may be passed through and/or manipulated within the operative corridor depending upon the given surgical procedure.



FIG. 1 illustrates a tissue retraction assembly 10 forming part of a surgical access system according to the present invention. The retraction assembly 10 includes a plurality of retractor blades extending from a handle assembly 20. By way of example only, the handle assembly 20 is provided with a posterior retractor blade 12, a cephalad-most retractor blade 16, and a caudal-most retractor blade 18. Although shown and described below with regard to the three-bladed configuration, it is to be readily appreciated that the number of retractor blades may be increased or decreased without departing from the scope of the present invention. The retractor assembly 10 is shown in a fully retracted or “open” configuration, with the retractor blades 12, 16, 18 positioned a distance from one another so as to form an operative corridor 15 there between and extending to a surgical target site (i.e. an annulus of an intervertebral disc).


The retractor blades 12, 16, 18 may be equipped with various additional features or components. By way of example only, posterior retractor blade 12 may be equipped with a shim element 22 (shown more clearly in FIG. 15). Shim element 22 serves to distract the adjacent vertebral bodies (thereby restoring disc height), helps secure the retractor assembly 10 relative to the surgical target site, and forms a protective barrier to prevent the ingress or egress of instruments or biological structures (i.e. nerves, vasculature, etc. . . . ) into or out of the operative corridor. Each of the remaining retractor blades (cephalad-most blade 16 and caudal-most blade 18) may be equipped with a retractor extender 24 (shown more clearly in FIG. 16). The retractor extenders 24 extend from the cephalad-most and caudal-most refractor blades 16, 18 to form a protective barrier to prevent the ingress or egress of instruments or biological structures (i.e. nerves, vasculature, etc. . . . ) into or out of the operative corridor.


According to the present invention, any or all of the retractor blades 12, 16, 18, the shim element 22 and/or the retractor extender 24 may be provided with one or more electrodes 39 (preferably at their distal regions) equipped for use with a nerve surveillance system, such as, by way of example, the type shown and described in the NeuroVision PCT Applications set forth below.


The handle assembly 20 may be coupled to any number of mechanisms for rigidly registering the handle assembly 20 in fixed relation to the operative site, such as through the use of an articulating arm mounted to the operating table. The handle assembly 20 includes first and second arm members 26, 28 hingedly coupled via coupling mechanism 30 (i.e. bolt/nut combination disposed through receiving apertures formed along arm members 26, 28). The cephalad-most retractor blade 16 is rigidly coupled (generally perpendicularly) to the end of the first arm member 26. The caudal-most retractor blade 18 is rigidly coupled (generally perpendicularly) to the end of the second arm member 28. With combined reference to FIG. 10, the posterior retractor blade 12 is rigidly coupled (generally perpendicularly to) a translating member 17, which is coupled to the handle assembly 20 via a linkage assembly 14. The linkage assembly 14 includes a first link 34 hingedly disposed between the translating member 17 and a point along the first arm member 26 of the handle assembly 20, and a second link 36 hingedly disposed between the translating member 17 and the second arm member 28 of the handle assembly 20. The translating member 17 includes a translation slot 19 through the bolt/nut combination of the coupling mechanism 30 may engage. In use, a user can squeeze the proximal ends of the arms 26, 28 and thereby cause the coupling mechanism 30 to translate distally within the slot 19, which increases the relative distance between the posterior retractor blade 12 and the cephalad-most and caudal-most refractor blades 16, 18. This squeezing motion of the arms 26, 28 simultaneously causes the cephalad-most and caudal-most retractor blades 16, 18 to move away from one another. Taken collectively, the diameter of the operative corridor 15 increases at approximately the same time. An optional locking mechanism 35 (i.e. bolt and nut combination extending between arm members 26, 28) may be provided to selectively lock the arm members 26, 28 relative to one another to thus maintain the retractor assembly 10 in the fully retracted position, once achieved.



FIG. 2 illustrates an initial distraction assembly 40 forming part of the surgical access system according to the present invention. The initial distraction assembly 40 includes a K-wire 42, an initial dilating cannula 44 with handle 46, and a split-dilator 48 housed within the initial dilating cannula 44. In use, the K-wire 42 and split-dilator 48 are disposed within the initial dilating cannula 44 and the entire assembly 40 advanced through the tissue towards the surgical target site (i.e. annulus). Again, this is preferably accomplished while employing the nerve detection and/or direction features described above. After the initial dilating assembly 40 is advanced such that the distal ends of the split-dilator 48 and initial dilator 44 are positioned within the disc space (FIG. 2), the initial dilator 44 and handle 46 are removed (FIG. 3) to thereby leave the split-dilator 48 and K-wire 42 in place. As shown in FIG. 4, the split-dilator 48 is thereafter split such that the respective halves 48a, 48b are separated from one another to distract tissue in a generally cephalad-caudal fashion relative to the target site. The split dilator 48 may thereafter be relaxed (allowing the dilator halves 48a, 48b to come together) and rotated such that the dilator halves 48a, 48b are disposed in the anterior-posterior plane. Once rotated in this manner, the dilator halves 48a, 48b are again separated to distract tissue in a generally anterior-posterior fashion. Each dilator halve 48a, 48b may be, according to the present invention, provided with one or more electrodes (preferably at their distal regions) equipped for use with a nerve surveillance system, such as, by way of example, the type shown and described in the NeuroVision PCT Applications set forth below.


Following this initial distraction, a secondary distraction may be optionally undertaken, such as via a sequential dilation system 50 as shown in FIG. 5. According to the present invention, the sequential dilation system 50 may include the K-wire 42, the initial dilator 44, and one or more supplemental dilators 52, 54 for the purpose of further dilating the tissue down to the surgical target site. Once again, each component of the secondary distraction assembly 50 (namely, the K-wire 42, the initial dilator 44, and the supplemental dilators 52, 54 may be, according to the present invention, provided with one or more electrodes (preferably at their distal regions) equipped for use with a nerve surveillance system, such as, by way of example, the type shown and described in the NeuroVision PCT Applications set forth below.


As shown in FIGS. 6-7, the retraction assembly 10 of the present invention is thereafter advanced along the exterior of the sequential dilation system 50. This is accomplished by maintaining the retractor blades 12, 16, 18 in a first, closed position (with the retractor blades 12-16 in generally abutting relation to one another). Once advanced to the surgical target site, the handle assembly 20 may be operated as shown in FIGS. 8-10 to move the retractor blades 12, 16, 18 into a second, open or “retracted” position. As one can see, the posterior retractor blade 12 is allowed to stay in the same general position during this process, such that the cephalad-most and caudal-most retractor blades 14, 16 move away from the posterior retractor blade 12. Again, this is accomplished through the cooperation between the translation member 17 (attached to the posterior refractor blade 12) and the arms 26, 28 of the handle assembly 20 via the linkage assembly 14 and slot 19 in conjunction with the coupling mechanism 30. FIGS. 11-13 illustrate the retractor assembly 10 in the second, opened (i.e. retracted) position (with the secondary distraction assembly 50 removed for clarity) illustrating the operative corridor 15 to the surgical target site according to the present invention.



FIGS. 14-16 illustrate an important aspect of the present invention, wherein (FIG. 15) each retractor blade 12, 16, 18 is provided with a pair of engagement grooves 37 having, by way of example only, a generally dove-tailed cross-sectional shape. The engagement grooves 37 are dimensioned to engage with dove-tail elements 41 provided on the shim element 22 (FIG. 15) and each retractor extender 24 (FIG. 16). In a preferred embodiment, the shim element 22 and retractor extender 24 are each provided with an elongate slot 43 and tool-engaging elements 45. A tool may be used to bias the arms 47 of each device inwardly towards one another (decreasing the width of part or most of the slot 43), which forces the dove-tail elements 41 towards one another. This is shown, by way of example only, in FIGS. 17-18, wherein a tool 59 is used to introduce the shim element 22 into engaged relation with the posterior retractor blade 12. When the shim element 22 has been introduced to a desired position (such as having the distal end extend into the intradiscal space as best shown in FIGS. 18 and 20), the tool 59 may then be disengaged or released from the tool-engaging elements 45 such that the dove-tail elements 41 return to their normal position (being biased outwardly by the resiliency of the arms 47) to thereby secure the shim element 22 relative to the posterior retractor blade 12. FIGS. 19-21 illustrate the shim element 22 after introduction according to the present invention. The same process can be used with the retractor extender 24 shown in FIG. 16 with respect to the cephalad-most and caudal-most refractor blades 16, 18. The end result is shown in FIG. 22 with the retraction assembly 10 of the present invention disposed in position over a surgical target site.


Nerve Surveillance

According to yet another aspect of the present invention, any number of distraction components and/or retraction components (including but not limited to those described herein) may be equipped to detect the presence of (and optionally the distance and/or direction to) neural structures during the steps tissue distraction and/or retraction. This is accomplished by employing the following steps: (1) one or more stimulation electrodes are provided on the various distraction and/or retraction components; (2) a stimulation source (e.g. voltage or current) is coupled to the stimulation electrodes; (3) a stimulation signal is emitted from the stimulation electrodes as the various components are advanced towards or maintained at or near the surgical target site; and (4) the patient is monitored to determine if the stimulation signal causes muscles associated with nerves or neural structures within the tissue to innervate. If the nerves innervate, this may indicate that neural structures may be in close proximity to the distraction and/or refraction components.


Neural monitoring may be accomplished via any number of suitable fashions, including but not limited to observing visual twitches in muscle groups associated with the neural structures likely to found in the tissue, as well as any number of monitoring systems, including but not limited to any commercially available “traditional” electromyography (EMG) system (that is, typically operated by a neurophysiologist. Such monitoring may also be carried out via the surgeon-driven EMG monitoring system shown and described in the following commonly owned and co-pending PCT Applications (collectively “NeuroVision PCT Applications”): PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US02/22247, entitled “System and Methods for Determining Nerve Proximity, Direction, and Pathology During Surgery,” filed on Jul. 11, 2002; PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US02/30617, entitled “System and Methods for Performing Surgical Procedures and Assessments,” filed on Sep. 25, 2002; PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US02/35047, entitled “System and Methods for Performing Percutaneous Pedicle Integrity Assessments,” filed on Oct. 30, 2002; and PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US03/02056, entitled “System and Methods for Determining Nerve Direction to a Surgical Instrument,” filed Jan. 15, 2003. The entire contents of each of the above-enumerated NeuroVision PCT Applications is hereby expressly incorporated by reference into this disclosure as if set forth fully herein.


In any case (visual monitoring, traditional EMG and/or surgeon-driven EMG monitoring), the access system of the present invention may advantageously be used to traverse tissue that would ordinarily be deemed unsafe or undesirable, thereby broadening the number of manners in which a given surgical target site may be accessed.



FIGS. 23-24 illustrate, by way of example only, a monitoring system 120 of the type disclosed in the NeuroVision PCT Applications suitable for use with the surgical access system 10 of the present invention. The monitoring system 120 includes a control unit 122, a patient module 124, and an EMG harness 126 and return electrode 128 coupled to the patient module 124, and a cable 132 for establishing electrical communication between the patient module 124 and the surgical access system 10 (FIG. 1). More specifically, this electrical communication can be achieved by providing, by way of example only, a hand-held stimulation controller 152 capable of selectively providing a stimulation signal (due to the operation of manually operated buttons on the hand-held stimulation controller 152) to one or more connectors 156a, 156b, 156c. The connectors 156a, 156b, 156c are suitable to establish electrical communication between the hand-held stimulation controller 152 and (by way of example only) the stimulation electrodes on the K-wire 42, the dilators 44, 52, 54, the retractor blades 12, 16, 18 and/or the shim elements 22, 24 (collectively “surgical access instruments”).


In order to use the monitoring system 120, then, these surgical access instruments must be connected to the connectors 156a, 156b and/or 156c, at which point the user may selectively initiate a stimulation signal (preferably, a current signal) from the control unit 122 to a particular surgical access instruments. Stimulating the electrode(s) on these surgical access instruments before, during and/or after establishing operative corridor will cause nerves that come into close or relative proximity to the surgical access instruments to depolarize, producing a response in a myotome associated with the innervated nerve.


The control unit 122 includes a touch screen display 140 and a base 142, which collectively contain the essential processing capabilities (software and/or hardware) for controlling the monitoring system 120. The control unit 122 may include an audio unit 118 that emits sounds according to a location of a surgical element with respect to a nerve. The patient module 124 is connected to the control unit 122 via a data cable 144, which establishes the electrical connections and communications (digital and/or analog) between the control unit 122 and patient module 124. The main functions of the control unit 122 include receiving user commands via the touch screen display 140, activating stimulation electrodes on the surgical access instruments, processing signal data according to defined algorithms, displaying received parameters and processed data, and monitoring system status and report fault conditions. The touch screen display 140 is preferably equipped with a graphical user interface (GUI) capable of communicating information to the user and receiving instructions from the user. The display 140 and/or base 142 may contain patient module interface circuitry (hardware and/or software) that commands the stimulation sources, receives digitized signals and other information from the patient module 124, processes the EMG responses to extract characteristic information for each muscle group, and displays the processed data to the operator via the display 140.


In one embodiment, the monitoring system 120 is capable of determining nerve direction relative to one or more of the surgical access instruments before, during and/or following the creation of an operative corridor to a surgical target site. Monitoring system 120 accomplishes this by having the control unit 122 and patient module 124 cooperate to send electrical stimulation signals to one or more of the stimulation electrodes provided on these instruments. Depending upon the location of the surgical access system 10 within a patient (and more particularly, to any neural structures), the stimulation signals may cause nerves adjacent to or in the general proximity of the surgical access system 10 to depolarize. This causes muscle groups to innervate and generate EMG responses, which can be sensed via the EMG harness 126. The nerve direction feature of the system 120 is based on assessing the evoked response of the various muscle myotomes monitored by the system 120 via the EMG harness 126.


By monitoring the myotomes associated with the nerves (via the EMG harness 126 and recording electrode 127) and assessing the resulting EMG responses (via the control unit 122), the surgical access system 10 is capable of detecting the presence of (and optionally the distant and/or direction to) such nerves. This provides the ability to actively negotiate around or past such nerves to safely and reproducibly form the operative corridor to a particular surgical target site, as well as monitor to ensure that no neural structures migrate into contact with the surgical access system 10 after the operative corridor has been established. In spinal surgery, for example, this is particularly advantageous in that the surgical access system 10 may be particularly suited for establishing an operative corridor to an intervertebral target site in a postero-lateral, trans-psoas fashion so as to avoid the bony posterior elements of the spinal column.



FIGS. 25-26 are exemplary screen displays (to be shown on the display 140) illustrating one embodiment of the nerve direction feature of the monitoring system shown and described with reference to FIGS. 23-24. These screen displays are intended to communicate a variety of information to the surgeon in an easy-to-interpret fashion. This information may include, but is not necessarily limited to, a display of the function 180 (in this case “DIRECTION”), a graphical representation of a patient 181, the myotome levels being monitored 182, the nerve or group associated with a displayed myotome 183, the name of the instrument being used 184 (in this case, a dilator 46, 48), the size of the instrument being used 185, the stimulation threshold current 186, a graphical representation of the instrument being used 187 (in this case, a cross-sectional view of a dilator 46, 48) to provide a reference point from which to illustrate relative direction of the instrument to the nerve, the stimulation current being applied to the stimulation electrodes 188, instructions for the user 189 (in this case, “ADVANCE” and/or “HOLD”), and (in FIG. 15) an arrow 190 indicating the direction from the instrument to a nerve. This information may be communicated in any number of suitable fashions, including but not limited to the use of visual indicia (such as alpha-numeric characters, light-emitting elements, and/or graphics) and audio communications (such as a speaker element). Although shown with specific reference to a dilating cannula (such as at 184), it is to be readily appreciated that the present invention is deemed to include providing similar information on the display 140 during the use of any or all of the various instruments forming the surgical access system 10 of the present invention, including the distraction assemblies 40, 50, the retractor blades 12, 16, 18 and/or the shim members 22, 24.


The surgical access system 10 of the present invention may be sold or distributed to end users in any number of suitable kits or packages (sterile and/or non-sterile) containing some or all of the various components described herein.


As evident from the above discussion and drawings, the present invention accomplishes the goal of gaining access a surgical target site in a fashion less invasive than traditional “open” surgeries and, moreover, does so in a manner that provides the ability to access such a surgical target site regardless of the neural structures required to be passed through (or near) in order to establish an operative corridor to the surgical target site. The present invention furthermore provides the ability to perform neural monitoring in the tissue or regions adjacent the surgical target site during any procedures performed after the operative corridor has been established. The surgical access system of the present invention can be used in any of a wide variety of surgical or medical applications, above and beyond the spinal applications discussed herein. Such spinal applications may include any procedure wherein instruments, devices, implants and/or compounds are to be introduced into or adjacent the surgical target site, including but not limited to discectomy, fusion (including PLIF, ALIF, TLIF and any fusion effectuated via a lateral or far-lateral approach and involving, by way of example, the introduction of bone products (such as allograft or autograft) and/or devices having ceramic, metal and/or plastic construction (such as mesh) and/or compounds such as bone morphogenic protein), total disc replacement, etc. . . . ).


Moreover, the surgical access system of the present invention opens the possibility of accessing an increased number of surgical target sites in a “less invasive” fashion by eliminating or greatly reducing the threat of contacting nerves or neural structures while establishing an operative corridor through or near tissues containing such nerves or neural structures. In so doing, the surgical access system of the present invention represents a significant advancement capable of improving patient care (via reduced pain due to “less-invasive” access and reduced or eliminated risk of neural contact before, during, and after the establishment of the operative corridor) and lowering health care costs (via reduced hospitalization based on “less-invasive” access and increased number of suitable surgical target sites based on neural monitoring). Collectively, these translate into major improvements to the overall standard of care available to the patient population, both domestically and overseas.


While certain embodiments have been described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that variations may be accomplished in view of these teachings without deviating from the spirit or scope of the present application. For example, with regard to the monitoring system 120, it may be implemented using any combination of computer programming software, firmware or hardware. As a preparatory act to practicing the system 120 or constructing an apparatus according to the application, the computer programming code (whether software or firmware) according to the application will typically be stored in one or more machine readable storage mediums such as fixed (hard) drives, diskettes, optical disks, magnetic tape, semiconductor memories such as ROMs, PROMs, etc., thereby making an article of manufacture in accordance with the application. The article of manufacture containing the computer programming code may be used by either executing the code directly from the storage device, by copying the code from the storage device into another storage device such as a hard disk, RAM, etc. or by transmitting the code on a network for remote execution. As can be envisioned by one of skill in the art, many different combinations of the above may be used and accordingly the present application is not limited by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system for accessing a surgical target site, the system comprising: a three-bladed tissue retraction assembly comprising: a first retractor arm having a first length extending between a first proximal end and a first distal end, the first retractor arm comprising a first blade connecting portion at the first distal end and a first pivot portion toward the first proximal end;a second retractor arm having a second length extending between a second proximal end and a second distal end, the second retractor arm comprising a second blade connecting portion at the second distal end and a second pivot portion toward the second proximal end;a coupling mechanism hingedly connecting the first pivot portion of the first retractor arm and the second pivot portion of the second retractor arm such that the first retractor arm is pivotable with respect to the second retractor arm about the coupling mechanism;a translating member defining a translation slot extending along a length of the translating member and having a third blade connecting portion at a distal end of the translating member, wherein the first and second retractor arms are slidably connected to the translating member at the translation slot via the coupling mechanism;a caudal-most retractor blade connected to the first blade connecting portion of the first retractor arm at a proximal end of the caudal-most retractor blade;a cephalad-most retractor blade connected to the second blade connecting portion of the second retractor arm at a proximal end of the cephalad-most retractor blade, wherein pivoting the first retractor arm with respect to the second retractor arm moves the caudal-most retractor blade away from the cephalad-most retractor blade; anda posterior-most retractor blade connected to the third blade connecting portion of the translating member at a proximal end of the posterior-most retractor blade, wherein sliding the coupling mechanism in the translation slot toward the distal end of the translation member causes the caudal-most retractor blade and the cephalad-most retractor blade to translate in unison away from the posterior-most retractor blade.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the tissue retraction assembly further comprises: a shim mechanically engagable with the posterior-most retractor blade so as to be positioned on an inner side of the posterior-most retractor blade and extend past a distal end of the posterior-most retractor blade.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein one of the shim and the posterior-most retractor blade define first and second engagement grooves dimensioned to engage with first and second edges of the other of the shim and the posterior-most retractor blade.
  • 4. The system of claim 2, wherein the shim comprises a shim proximal end and a shim distal end with a proximal section near the proximal end, a distal section near the distal end, and a middle section between the proximal section and the distal section, wherein the proximal section is wider than the middle section which is wider than the distal section, and wherein the shim defines an elongate slot extending from a proximal edge at the shim proximal end toward the distal end.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein each of the retractor blades curve inward toward a working corridor defined between the retractor blades, wherein the retractor blades are actuable between a closed position with each of the retractor blades adjacent each of the other of the retractor blades to define a substantially closed working corridor and a retracted position with each of the retractor blades spaced from each of the other of the retractor blades to define an open working corridor.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the tissue retraction assembly further comprises: a shim mechanically engagable with the posterior-most retractor blade so as to extend past a distal end of the posterior-most retractor blade;a first retractor extender mechanically engagable with the caudal-most retractor blade so as to extend past a distal end of the caudal-most retractor blade; anda second retractor extender mechanically engagable with the cephalad-most retractor blade so as to extend past a distal end of the cephalad-most retractor blade, wherein the shim extends further in a distal direction than each of the first and second retractor extenders and wherein the shim is narrower at its distal end than the first and second retractor extenders.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein each of the caudal-most retractor blade, cephalad-most retractor blade, posterior-most retractor blade, shim, first retractor extender, and second retractor extender has at least one stimulation electrode at distal regions thereof.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, and further comprising: a sequential dilation system comprising a plurality of dilators sized for the tissue retraction assembly to be advanced over the sequential dilation system, wherein each of the plurality of dilators has at least one stimulation electrode at distal regions of the plurality of dilators, and wherein each of the caudal-most retractor blade, cephalad-most retractor blade, and posterior-most retractor blade has at least one stimulation electrode at distal regions of the caudal-most retractor blade, cephalad-most retractor blade, and posterior-most retractor blade; anda nerve surveillance system electrically connectable to each of the dilators and retractor blades and configured to stimulate the dilators and retractor blades when inserted into tissue proximate nerves.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the nerve surveillance system comprises: an EMG (electromyography) harness having a plurality of recording electrodes positioned along branches of the EMG harness in pairs, wherein each branch of the EMG harness has a plurality of pairs of recording electrodes; anda control unit operably connectable to the stimulation electrodes to activate the stimulation electrodes and to the recording electrodes on the EMG harness to receive EMG response signals from the recording electrodes.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein at least two of the retractor blades comprise light-transmission paths extending through the retractor blades between inner and outer walls of the retractor blades and toward light exiting portions on the inner walls of the retractor blades.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the first retractor arm has a first handle extension portion extending between the first proximal end and the first pivot portion and wherein the second retractor arm has a second handle extension portion extending between the second proximal end and the second pivot portion.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the three-bladed retraction assembly is configured to maintain a trans-psoas operative corridor to the surgical target site at a lumbar spine, the system further comprising means for trans-psoas dilation to define a tissue distraction corridor.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the means for trans-psoas dilation comprises a sequential dilation system configured to advance through a psoas muscle to define the tissue distraction corridor.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the sequential dilation system comprises a plurality of dilators sized for the tissue retraction assembly to be advanced over the sequential dilation system.
  • 15. The system of claim 12, wherein the means for trans-psoas dilatation defines an outer cylindrical surface sized to slidingly mate with curved inwardly facing surfaces of the caudal-most retactor blade, the cephalad-most retractor blade, and the posterior-most retractor blade.
  • 16. The system of claim 12, wherein the means for trans-psoas dilatation comprises at least one stimulation electrode at a distal region so as to output electrical stimulation within a psoas muscle.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, further comprising means for nerve monitoring during the output of the electrical stimulation within the psoas muscle.
  • 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the means for nerve monitoring comprises a nerve surveillance system electrically connectable to said at least one stimulation electrode of the each of the means for trans-psoas dilatation.
  • 19. The system of claim 17, wherein the means for nerve monitoring comprises: a sensor harness having a plurality of recording electrodes positioned along branches of the sensor harness in pairs, wherein each branch of the sensor harness has a plurality of pairs of recording electrodes; anda control unit operably connectable to said at least one stimulation electrode and to the recording electrodes on the sensor harness to receive neuromuscular response signals from the recording electrodes.
  • 20. A system for accessing a surgical target site, the system comprising: a three-bladed tissue retraction assembly comprising: a first retractor arm having a first length extending between a first proximal end and a first distal end, the first retractor arm comprising a first blade connecting portion at the first distal end and a first pivot portion toward the first proximal end;a second retractor arm having a second length extending between a second proximal end and a second distal end, the second retractor arm comprising a second blade connecting portion at the second distal end and a second pivot portion toward the second proximal end;a coupling mechanism hingedly connecting the first pivot portion of the first retractor arm and the second pivot portion of the second retractor arm such that the first retractor arm is pivotable with respect to the second retractor arm about the coupling mechanism;a translating member defining a translation slot extending along a length of the translating member and having a third blade connecting portion at a distal end of the translating member, wherein the first and second retractor arms are slidably connected to the translating member at the translation slot via the coupling mechanism;a first retractor blade connected to the first blade connecting portion of the first retractor arm at a proximal end of the first retractor blade;a second retractor blade connected to the second blade connecting portion of the second retractor arm at a proximal end of the second retractor blade, wherein pivoting the first retractor arm with respect to the second retractor arm moves the first retractor blade away from the second retractor blade;a third retractor blade connected to the third blade connecting portion of the translating member at a proximal end of the third retractor blade, wherein sliding the coupling mechanism in the translation slot toward the distal end of the translation member causes the first retractor blade and the second retractor blade to translate in unison away from the third retractor blade wherein at least two of the retractor blades comprise light-transmission paths extending through the retractor blades between inner and outer walls of the retractor blades and toward light exiting portions on the inner walls of the retractor blades; anda shim mechanically engagable with the third retractor blade so as to be positioned on an inner side of the third retractor blade and extend past a distal end of the third retractor blade, wherein one of the shim and the third retractor blade define first and second engagement grooves dimensioned to engage with first and second edges of the other of the shim and the third retractor blade, wherein the shim comprises a shim proximal end and a shim distal end with a proximal section near the proximal end, a distal section near the distal end, and a middle section between the proximal section and the distal section, wherein the proximal section is wider than the middle section which is wider than the distal section, and wherein the shim defines an elongate slot extending from a proximal edge at the shim proximal end toward the distal end;a first retractor extender mechanically engagable with the first retractor blade so as to extend past a distal end of the first retractor blade; anda second retractor extender mechanically engagable with the second retractor blade so as to extend past a distal end of the second retractor blade, wherein the shim extends further in a distal direction than each of the first and second retractor extenders and wherein the shim is narrower at its distal end than the first and second retractor extenders;a sequential dilation system comprising: a plurality of dilators sized for the tissue retraction assembly to be advanced over the sequential dilation system, wherein each of the plurality of dilators has at least one stimulation electrode at distal regions of the plurality of dilators, and wherein each of the first retractor blade, second retractor blade, and third retractor blade has at least one stimulation electrode at distal regions of the first retractor blade, second retractor blade, and third retractor blade; anda nerve surveillance system electrically connectable to each of the dilators and retractor blades and configured to stimulate the electrodes on the dilators and retractor blades when inserted into tissue proximate nerves, wherein the nerve surveillance system comprises: an EMG (electromyography) harness having a plurality of recording electrodes positioned along branches of the EMG harness in pairs, wherein each branch of the EMG harness has a plurality of pairs of recording electrodes; anda control unit operably connectable to the stimulation electrodes to activate the stimulation electrodes and to the recording electrodes on the EMG harness to receive EMG response signals from the recording electrodes.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/756,951, filed on Feb. 1, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/668,504, filed on Nov. 5, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/030,798, filed on Feb. 18, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,303,498), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/632,373 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,892,173), filed on Dec. 7, 2009, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/789,797 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,819,801), filed on Feb. 27, 2004, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Applications Ser. No. 60/450,806, filed Feb. 27, 2003, the entire contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference into this disclosure as if set forth fully herein.

US Referenced Citations (327)
Number Name Date Kind
208227 Dorr Sep 1878 A
972983 Arthur Oct 1910 A
1003232 Cerbo Oct 1910 A
1044348 Cerbo Jun 1912 A
1328624 Graham Jan 1920 A
1548184 Cameron Aug 1925 A
1919120 O'Connor et al. Jul 1933 A
2594086 Smith Apr 1952 A
2704064 Fizzell et al. Mar 1955 A
2736002 Oriel Feb 1956 A
2808826 Reiner et al. Oct 1957 A
3364929 Ide et al. Jan 1968 A
3664329 Naylor May 1972 A
3682162 Colyer Aug 1972 A
3785368 McCarthy et al. Jan 1974 A
3803716 Garnier Apr 1974 A
3830226 Staub et al. Aug 1974 A
3957036 Normann May 1976 A
D245789 Shea et al. Sep 1977 S
4099519 Warren Jul 1978 A
4164214 Stark et al. Aug 1979 A
4207897 Lloyd et al. Jun 1980 A
4224949 Scott et al. Sep 1980 A
4226228 Shin et al. Oct 1980 A
4226288 Collins, Jr. Oct 1980 A
4235242 Howson et al. Nov 1980 A
4285347 Hess Aug 1981 A
4291705 Severinghaus et al. Sep 1981 A
4449532 Storz May 1984 A
4461300 Christensen Jul 1984 A
4512351 Pohndorf Apr 1985 A
4515168 Chester et al. May 1985 A
4519403 Dickhudt May 1985 A
4545374 Jacobson Oct 1985 A
4561445 Berke et al. Dec 1985 A
4562832 Wilder et al. Jan 1986 A
4573448 Kambin Mar 1986 A
4592369 Davis et al. Jun 1986 A
4595013 Jones et al. Jun 1986 A
4595018 Rantala Jun 1986 A
4611597 Kraus Sep 1986 A
4616635 Caspar et al. Oct 1986 A
4633889 Talalla et al. Jan 1987 A
4658835 Pohndorf Apr 1987 A
D295445 Freeman Apr 1988 S
4744371 Harris May 1988 A
4753223 Bremer Jun 1988 A
4759377 Dykstra Jul 1988 A
4784150 Voorhies et al. Nov 1988 A
4807642 Brown Feb 1989 A
D300561 Asa et al. Apr 1989 S
4892105 Prass Jan 1990 A
4913134 Luque Apr 1990 A
4917274 Asa et al. Apr 1990 A
4917704 Frey et al. Apr 1990 A
4926865 Oman May 1990 A
4950257 Hibbs et al. Aug 1990 A
4962766 Herzon Oct 1990 A
4964411 Johnson et al. Oct 1990 A
5007902 Witt Apr 1991 A
5015247 Michelson May 1991 A
5045054 Hood et al. Sep 1991 A
5052373 Michelson Oct 1991 A
5058602 Brody Oct 1991 A
5081990 Deletis Jan 1992 A
5092344 Lee Mar 1992 A
5127403 Brownlee Jul 1992 A
5161533 Prass et al. Nov 1992 A
5171279 Mathews Dec 1992 A
5192327 Brantigan Mar 1993 A
5195541 Obenchain Mar 1993 A
5196015 Neubardt Mar 1993 A
5215100 Spitz et al. Jun 1993 A
RE34390 Culver Sep 1993 E
D340521 Heinzelman et al. Oct 1993 S
5255691 Otten Oct 1993 A
5282468 Klepinski Feb 1994 A
5284153 Raymond et al. Feb 1994 A
5284154 Raymond et al. Feb 1994 A
5295994 Bonutti Mar 1994 A
5299563 Seton Apr 1994 A
5312417 Wilk May 1994 A
5313956 Knutsson et al. May 1994 A
5313962 Obenchain May 1994 A
5327902 Lemmen Jul 1994 A
5331975 Bonutti Jul 1994 A
5333618 Lekhtman et al. Aug 1994 A
5342384 Sugarbaker Aug 1994 A
5357983 Mathews Oct 1994 A
5375067 Berchin Dec 1994 A
5375594 Cueva Dec 1994 A
5383876 Nardella Jan 1995 A
5395317 Kambin Mar 1995 A
5450845 Axelgaard Sep 1995 A
5472426 Bonati et al. Dec 1995 A
5474057 Makower et al. Dec 1995 A
5474558 Neubardt Dec 1995 A
5480440 Kambin Jan 1996 A
5482038 Ruff Jan 1996 A
5484437 Michelson Jan 1996 A
5487739 Aebischer et al. Jan 1996 A
5509893 Pracas Apr 1996 A
5514153 Bonutti May 1996 A
5540235 Wilson Jul 1996 A
5549656 Reiss Aug 1996 A
5560372 Cory Oct 1996 A
5566678 Cadwell Oct 1996 A
5569290 McAfee Oct 1996 A
5571149 Liss et al. Nov 1996 A
5579781 Cooke Dec 1996 A
5593429 Ruff Jan 1997 A
5599279 Slotman et al. Feb 1997 A
5630813 Kieturakis May 1997 A
5667508 Errico et al. Sep 1997 A
5671752 Sinderby et al. Sep 1997 A
5681265 Maeda et al. Oct 1997 A
5688223 Rosendahl Nov 1997 A
5707359 Bufalini Jan 1998 A
5711307 Smits Jan 1998 A
5728046 Mayer et al. Mar 1998 A
5741253 Michelson Apr 1998 A
5741261 Moskovitz et al. Apr 1998 A
5759159 Masreliez Jun 1998 A
5762629 Kambin Jun 1998 A
5772661 Michelson Jun 1998 A
5775331 Raymond et al. Jul 1998 A
5776144 Leysieffer et al. Jul 1998 A
5779642 Nightengale Jul 1998 A
5785658 Benaron Jul 1998 A
5792044 Foley et al. Aug 1998 A
5797854 Hedgecock Aug 1998 A
5797909 Michelson Aug 1998 A
5814073 Bonutti Sep 1998 A
5830151 Hadzic et al. Nov 1998 A
5851191 Gozani Dec 1998 A
5853373 Griffith et al. Dec 1998 A
5860973 Michelson Jan 1999 A
5862314 Jeddeloh Jan 1999 A
5872314 Clinton Feb 1999 A
5885210 Cox Mar 1999 A
5885219 Nightengale Mar 1999 A
5888196 Bonutti Mar 1999 A
5891147 Moskovitz et al. Apr 1999 A
5902231 Foley et al. May 1999 A
5928139 Koros et al. Jul 1999 A
5928158 Aristides Jul 1999 A
5931777 Sava Aug 1999 A
5935131 Bonutti Aug 1999 A
5938688 Schiff Aug 1999 A
5944658 Koros et al. Aug 1999 A
5976094 Gozani Nov 1999 A
6004262 Putz et al. Dec 1999 A
6004312 Finneran Dec 1999 A
6007487 Foley et al. Dec 1999 A
6010520 Pattison Jan 2000 A
6024696 Hoftman et al. Feb 2000 A
6024697 Pisarik Feb 2000 A
6027456 Feler et al. Feb 2000 A
6038469 Karlsson et al. Mar 2000 A
6038477 Kayyali Mar 2000 A
6050992 Nichols Apr 2000 A
6074343 Nathanson et al. Jun 2000 A
6080105 Spears Jun 2000 A
6083154 Liu et al. Jul 2000 A
6095987 Schmulewitz et al. Aug 2000 A
6104957 Alo et al. Aug 2000 A
6104960 Duysens et al. Aug 2000 A
6120503 Michelson Sep 2000 A
6126660 Dietz Oct 2000 A
6132386 Gozani et al. Oct 2000 A
6132387 Gozani et al. Oct 2000 A
6135965 Tumer et al. Oct 2000 A
6139493 Koros et al. Oct 2000 A
6142931 Kaji Nov 2000 A
6146335 Gozani Nov 2000 A
6152871 Foley et al. Nov 2000 A
6159179 Simonson Dec 2000 A
6161047 King et al. Dec 2000 A
6174311 Branch et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181961 Prass Jan 2001 B1
6196969 Bester et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206826 Mathews et al. Mar 2001 B1
6217509 Foley et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224549 Drongelen May 2001 B1
6245082 Gellman et al. Jun 2001 B1
6259945 Epstein et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264651 Underwood et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266558 Gozani et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273905 Streeter Aug 2001 B1
6292701 Prass et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306100 Prass Oct 2001 B1
6308712 Shaw Oct 2001 B1
6312392 Herzon Nov 2001 B1
6325764 Griffith et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334068 Hacker Dec 2001 B1
6348058 Melkent et al. Feb 2002 B1
6360750 Gerber et al. Mar 2002 B1
6371968 Kogasaka et al. Apr 2002 B1
6395007 Bhatnagar et al. May 2002 B1
6416465 Brau Jul 2002 B2
6425859 Foley et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425887 McGuckin et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425901 Zhu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6450952 Rioux et al. Sep 2002 B1
6451015 Rittman, III et al. Sep 2002 B1
6466817 Kaula et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468205 Mollenauer et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468207 Fowler, Jr. Oct 2002 B1
6500116 Knapp Dec 2002 B1
6500128 Marino Dec 2002 B2
6520907 Foley et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524320 DiPoto Feb 2003 B2
6535759 Epstein et al. Mar 2003 B1
6564078 Marino et al. May 2003 B1
6579244 Goodwin Jun 2003 B2
6599294 Fuss et al. Jul 2003 B2
6620157 Dabney et al. Sep 2003 B1
6645194 Briscoe et al. Nov 2003 B2
6679833 Smith et al. Jan 2004 B2
6719692 Kleffner et al. Apr 2004 B2
6760616 Hoey et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770074 Michelson Aug 2004 B2
6796985 Bolger et al. Sep 2004 B2
6810281 Brock et al. Oct 2004 B2
6819956 DiLorenzo Nov 2004 B2
6829508 Schulman et al. Dec 2004 B2
6847849 Mamo et al. Jan 2005 B2
6849047 Goodwin Feb 2005 B2
6855105 Jackson, III Feb 2005 B2
6869398 Obenchain Mar 2005 B2
6871099 Whitehurst et al. Mar 2005 B1
6902569 Parmer et al. Jun 2005 B2
6916330 Simonson Jul 2005 B2
6926728 Zucherman et al. Aug 2005 B2
6929606 Ritland Aug 2005 B2
6945933 Branch Sep 2005 B2
6951538 Ritland Oct 2005 B2
7047082 Schrom et al. May 2006 B1
7050848 Hoey et al. May 2006 B2
7079883 Marino et al. Jul 2006 B2
7089059 Pless Aug 2006 B1
7177677 Kaula et al. Feb 2007 B2
7198598 Smith et al. Apr 2007 B2
7207949 Miles et al. Apr 2007 B2
7226451 Shluzas et al. Jun 2007 B2
7261688 Smith et al. Aug 2007 B2
7470236 Kelleher et al. Dec 2008 B1
7473222 Dewey et al. Jan 2009 B2
7481766 Lee et al. Jan 2009 B2
7522953 Kaula et al. Apr 2009 B2
7556601 Branch et al. Jul 2009 B2
7582058 Miles et al. Sep 2009 B1
7643884 Pond et al. Jan 2010 B2
7691057 Miles et al. Apr 2010 B2
7693562 Marino et al. Apr 2010 B2
7717959 William et al. May 2010 B2
7819801 Miles et al. Oct 2010 B2
7935051 Miles et al. May 2011 B2
8000782 Gharib et al. Aug 2011 B2
8005535 Gharib et al. Aug 2011 B2
8021430 Michelson Sep 2011 B2
8133173 Miles et al. Mar 2012 B2
8182423 Miles et al. May 2012 B2
8192356 Miles et al. Jun 2012 B2
8251997 Michelson Aug 2012 B2
8303458 Fukano et al. Nov 2012 B2
8343046 Miles et al. Jan 2013 B2
8343224 Lynn et al. Jan 2013 B2
8388527 Miles Mar 2013 B2
8740783 Gharib et al. Jun 2014 B2
20010039949 Loubser Nov 2001 A1
20010056280 Underwood et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020007129 Marino Jan 2002 A1
20020010392 Desai Jan 2002 A1
20020072686 Hoey et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077632 Tsou Jun 2002 A1
20020123744 Reynard Sep 2002 A1
20020123780 Grill et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020161415 Cohen et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020193843 Hill et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030032966 Foley et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030070682 Wilson et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030083688 Simonson May 2003 A1
20030105503 Marino Jun 2003 A1
20030139648 Foley et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149341 Clifton Aug 2003 A1
20030225405 Weiner Dec 2003 A1
20030236544 Lunsford et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040199084 Kelleher et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040225228 Ferree Nov 2004 A1
20050004593 Simonson Jan 2005 A1
20050004623 Miles et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033380 Tanner et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050075578 Gharib et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050080320 Lee et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050149035 Pimenta et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050182454 Gharib et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192575 Pacheco Sep 2005 A1
20060025703 Miles et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060052828 Kim et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069315 Miles et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060224078 Hoey et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070016097 Farquhar et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070198062 Miles et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070293782 Marino Dec 2007 A1
20080058606 Miles et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080058838 Steinberg Mar 2008 A1
20080064976 Kelleher et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080064977 Kelleher et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065144 Marino et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065178 Kelleher et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071191 Kelleher et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080097164 Miles et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080300465 Feigenwinter et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090124860 Miles et al. May 2009 A1
20090138050 Ferree May 2009 A1
20090192403 Gharib et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204016 Gharib et al. Aug 2009 A1
20100069783 Miles et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100130827 Pimenta et al. May 2010 A1
20100152603 Miles et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100160738 Miles et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100174146 Miles Jul 2010 A1
20100174148 Miles et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110313530 Gharib et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120238822 Miles Sep 2012 A1
20120238893 Farquhar et al. Sep 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (33)
Number Date Country
299 08 259 Jul 1999 DE
100 48 790 Apr 2002 DE
0 334 116 Sep 1989 EP
0 567 424 Oct 1993 EP
0 972 538 Jan 2000 EP
1 002 500 May 2000 EP
2 795 624 Jan 2001 FR
793186 May 1990 JP
10-14928 Mar 1996 JP
3019990007098 Nov 1999 KR
9428824 Dec 1994 WO
9700702 Jan 1997 WO
9823324 Jun 1998 WO
9952446 Oct 1999 WO
0027291 May 2000 WO
0038574 Jul 2000 WO
0044288 Aug 2000 WO
0066217 Nov 2000 WO
0067645 Nov 2000 WO
0108563 Feb 2001 WO
0137728 May 2001 WO
0160263 Aug 2001 WO
02054960 Jul 2002 WO
02058780 Aug 2002 WO
02071953 Sep 2002 WO
02087678 Nov 2002 WO
03005887 Jan 2003 WO
03026482 Apr 2003 WO
03037170 May 2003 WO
2005013805 Feb 2005 WO
2005030318 Apr 2005 WO
2006042241 Apr 2006 WO
2006066217 Jun 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (181)
Entry
Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine in MED TM MicroEndoscopic Discectomy (1997 Ludann Grand Rapids MI), 14 pgs.
Dirksmeier et al., “Microendoscopic and Open Laminotomy and Discectomy in Lumbar Disc Disease” Seminars in Spine Surgery, 1999, 11(2): 138-146.
METRx Delivered Order Form, 1999, 13 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek “METRx™ MicroDiscectomy System,” Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, 2000, 21 pgs.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek “METRx System Surgical Technique,” 2004, 22 pages.
“MetRx System MicroEndoscopic Discectomy: An Evolution in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery,” Sofamor Danek, 1999, 6 pages.
Smith and Foley “MetRx System MicroEndoscopic Discectomy: Surgical Technique” Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2000, 24 pages.
“Sofamor Danek MED Microendoscopic Discectomy System Brochure” including Rapp “New endoscopic lumbar technique improves access preserves tissue” Reprinted with permission from: Orthopedics Today, 1998, 18(1): 2 pages.
Japanese Patent Office JP Patent Application No. 2006-528306 Office Action with English Translation, Jun. 10, 2009, 4 pages.
Plaintiffs' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions re U.S. Pat. No. 7,207,949; 7,470,236 and 7,582,058, Sep. 18, 2009, 19 pages.
Plaintiffs' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions—Appendices, Sep. 18, 2009, 191 pages.
Plaintiffs' Supplemental Preliminary Invalidity Contentions re U.S. Pat. No. 7,207,949, 7,470,236, and 7,582,058, Sep. 29, 2009, 21 pages.
Plaintiffs' Supplemental Preliminary Invalidity Contentions—Appendices, Sep. 29, 2009, 294 pages.
Axon 501(k) Notification: Epoch 2000 Neurological Workstation, Dec. 3, 1997, 464 pages.
Foley and Smith, “Microendoscopic Discectomy,” Techniques in Neurosurgery, 1997, 3(4):301-307.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek “UNION™ / UNION-L™ Anterior & Lateral Impacted Fusion Devices: Clear choice of stabilization,” Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2000, 4 pages.
NuVasive Vector™ Cannulae, 2000, 1 page.
NuVasive Triad™ Tri-Columnar Spinal EndoArthrodesis™ via Minimally Invasive Guidance, 2000, 1 page (prior to Sep. 25, 2003).
NuVasive Triad™ Cortical Bone Allograft, 2000, 1 page (prior to Sep. 25, 2003).
NuVasive Vertebral Body Access System, 2000, 1 page.
Marina, “New Technology for Guided Navigation with Real Time Nerve Surveillance for Minimally Invasive Spine Discectomy & Arthrodesis,” Spineline, 2000, p. 39.
NuVasive “INS-1 Screw Test,” 2001, 10 pages.
NuVasive letter re 510k Neuro Vision JJB System, Oct. 16, 2001, 5 pages.
NuVasive letter re 510k Guided Arthroscopy System, Oct. 5, 1999, 6 pages.
NuVasive letter re 510k INS-1 Intraoperative Nerve Surveillance System, Nov. 13, 2000, 7 pages.
“NuVasiveTM Receives Clearance to Market Two Key Elem Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery System,” Nov. 27, 2001, 20 pages.
Schick et al., “Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study,” Eur Spine J, 2002, 11: 20-26.
NuVasive letter re: 510(k) for Neurovision JJB System (Summary), Sep. 25, 2001, 28 pages.
NuVasive letter re: Special 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), Jul. 3, 2003, 18 pages.
NuVasive letter re: Special 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), Mar. 1, 2004, 16 pages.
NuVasive letter re: Special 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), May 26, 2005, 17 pages.
NuVasive letter re: 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), Jun. 24, 2005, 16 pages.
NuVasive letter re: Special 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), Sep. 14, 2006, 17 pages.
NuVasive 510(k) Premarket Notification: Neurovision JJB System (Device Description), Aug. 20, 2007, 8 pages.
NuVasive letter re: 510(k) Premarket Notification: Guided Spinal Arthroscopy System (Device Description), Feb. 1, 1999, 40 pages.
NuVasive 510(k) Premarket Notification: Spinal System (Summary), Apr. 12, 2004, 10 pages.
NuVasive 510(k) Summary NIM Monitor, Sep. 4, 1998, 4 pages.
NuVasive correspondence re 510(k) Premarket Notification INS-1 Intraoperative Nerve Surveillance System: Section IV Device Description, pp. 12-51 (prior to Sep. 25, 2003).
Isley et al., “Recent Advances in Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of Spinal Cord Function: Pedicle Screw Stimulation Techniques,” American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology, Jun. 1997, 37(2): 93-126.
Mathews et al., “Laparoscopic Discectomy with Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Spine, 1995, 20(16): 1797-1802.
Rose et al., “Persistently Electrified Pedicle Stimulation Instruments in Spinal Instrumentation: Techniques and Protocol Development,” Spine, 1997, 22(3): 334-343.
“Electromyography System,” International Search report from International Application No. PCT/US00/32329, Apr. 27, 2001, 9 pages.
“Nerve Proximity and Status Detection System and Method,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US01/18606, Oct. 18, 2001, 6 pages.
“Relative Nerve Movement and Status Detection System and Method,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US01/18579, Jan. 15, 2002, 6 pages.
“System and Method for Determining Nerve Proximity Direction and Pathology During Surgery,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US02/22247, Mar. 27, 2003, 4 pages.
“System and Methods for Determining Nerve Direction to a Surgical Instrument,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US03/02056, Aug. 12, 2003, 5 pages.
“Systems and Methods for Performing Percutaneous Pedicle Integrity Assessments,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US02/35047, Aug. 11, 2003, 5 pages.
“Systems and Methods for Performing Surgery Procedures and Assessments,” International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US02/30617, Jun. 5, 2003, 4 pages.
Lenke et al., “Triggered Electromyographic Threshold for Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement,” Spine, 1995, 20(4): 1585-1591.
“Brackmann II EMG System,” Medical Electronics, 1999, 4 pages.
“Neurovision SE Nerve Locator/Monitor”, RLN Systems Inc. Operators Manual, 1999, 22 pages.
“The Brackmann II EMG Monitoring System,” Medical Electronics Co. Operator's Manual Version 1.1, 1995, 50 pages.
“The Nicolet Viking IV,” Nicolet Biomedical Products, 1999, 6 pages.
Anderson et al., “Pedicle screws with high electrical resistance: a potential source of error with stimulus-evoked EMG,” Spine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Virginia, Jul. 15, 2002, 27(14): 1577-1581.
Bose et al., “Neurophysiologic Monitoring of Spinal Nerve Root Function During Instrumented Posterior Lumber Spine Surgery,” Spine, 2002, 27(13):1444-1450.
Calancie et al., “Stimulus-Evoked EMG Monitoring During Transpedicular Lumbosacral Spine Instrumentation” Spine, 1994, 19(24): 2780-2786.
Clements et al., “Evoked and Spontaneous Electromyography to Evaluate Lumbosacral Pedicle Screw Placement,” Spine, 1996, 21(5): 600-604.
Danesh-Clough et al. ,“The Use of Evoked EMG in Detecting Misplaced Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screws,” Spine, Orthopaedic Department Dunedin Hospital, Jun. 15, 2001, 26(12): 1313-1316.
Darden et al., “A Comparison of Impedance and Electromyogram Measurements in Detecting the Presence of Pedicle Wall Breakthrough,” Spine, Charlotte Spine Center North Carolina, Jan. 15, 1998, 23(2): 256-262.
Ebraheim et al., “Anatomic Relations Between the Lumbar Pedicle and the Adjacent Neural Structures,” Spine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Medical College of Ohio, Oct. 15, 1997, 22(20): 2338-2341.
Ford et al. “Electrical Characteristics of Peripheral Nerve Stimulators Implications for Nerve Localization,” Regional Anesthesia, 1984, 9: 73-77.
Glassman et al., “A Prospective Analysis of Intraoperative Electromyographic Monitoring of Pedicle Screw Placement With Computed Tomographic Scan Confirmation,” Spine, 1995, 20(12): 1375-1379.
Greenblatt et al., “Needle Nerve Stimulator-Locator: Nerve Blocks with a New Instrument for Locating Nerves,” Anesthesia& Analgesia, 1962, 41(5): 599-602.
Haig, “Point of view,” Spine, 2002, 27(24): 2819.
Haig et al., “The Relation Among Spinal Geometry on MRI, Paraspinal Electromyographic Abnormalities, and Age in Persons Referred for Electrodiagnostic Testing of Low Back Symptoms,” Spine, Department of Physical Medicineand Rehabilitation University of Michigan, Sep. 1, 2002, 27(17): 1918-1925.
Holland et al., “Higher Electrical Stimulus Intensities are Required to Activate Chronically Compressed Nerve Roots: Implications for Intraoperative Electromyographic Pedicle Screw Testing,” Spine, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Jan. 15, 1998, 23(2): 224-227.
Holland, “Intraoperative Electromyography During Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery,” Spine, 1998, 23(17): 1915-1922.
Journee et al., “System for Intra-Operative Monitoring of the Cortical Integrity of the Pedicle During Pedicle Screw Placement in Low-Back Surgery: Design and Clinical Results,” Sensory and Neuromuscular Diagnostic Instrumentation and Data Analysis I, 18th Annual International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 144-145.
Maguire et al., “Evaluation of Intrapedicular Screw Position Using Intraoperative Evoked Electromyography,” Spine, 1995, 20(9): 1068-1074.
Martin et al. “Initiation of Erection and Semen Release by Rectal Probe Electrostimulation (RPE),” The Journal of Urology, The Williams& Wilkins Co., 1983, 129: 637-642.
Minahan et al., “The Effect of Neuromuscular Blockade on Pedicle Screw Stimulation Thresholds” Spine, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Oct. 1, 2000, 25(19): 2526-2530.
Pither et al., “The Use of Peripheral Nerve Stimulators for Regional Anesthesia: Review of Experimental Characteristics Technique and Clinical Applications,” Regional Anesthesia, 1985, 10:49-58.
Raj et al., “Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block—A New Approach” Anesthesia and Analgesia, 1973, (52)6: 897-904.
Raj et al., “The Use of Peripheral Nerve Stimulators for Regional Anesthesia,” Clinical Issues in Regional Anesthesia, 1985, 1(4):1-6.
Raj et al., “Use of the Nerve Stimulator for Peripheral Blocks,” Regional Anesthesia, Apr.-Jun. 1980, pp. 14-21.
Raymond et al., “The Nerve Seeker: A System for Automated Nerve Localization,” Regional Anesthesia, 1992, 17(3): 151-162.
Shafik, “Cavernous Nerve Simulation through an Extrapelvic Subpubic Approach: Role in Penile Erection,” Eur. Urol, 1994, 26: 98-102.
Toleikis et al., “The Usefulness of Electrical Stimulation for Assessing Pedicle Screw Replacements,” Journal of Spinal Disorder, 2000, 13(4): 283-289.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek “UNION™ / UNION-L™ Anterior & Lateral Impacted Fusion Devices: Surgical Technique” Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2001, 20 pages.
Defendant's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions Regarding U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,207,949; 7,470,236 and 7,582,058, Aug. 31, 2009, 21 pages.
Bergey et al., “Endoscopic Lateral Transpsoas Approach to the Lumbar Spine,” Spine, 2004, 29(15): 1681-1688.
Dezawa et al., “Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Lateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine: A New Approach, Technique, and Clinical Trial,” Journal of Spinal Disorders, 2000, 13(2): 138-143.
Gardocki, “Tubular diskectomy minimizes collateral damage: A logical progression moves spine surgery forward,” AAOS Now, 2009, 5 pages.
Hovorka et al., “Five years' experience of retroperitoneal lumbar and thoracolumbar surgery,” Eur Spine J., 2000, 9(1): S30-S34.
Kossmann et al., “The use of a retractor system (SynFrame) for open, minimal invasive reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracic and lumbar spine,” Eur Spine J., 2001, 10: 396-402.
Mayer, “A New Microsurgical Technique for Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Spine, 1997, 22(6): 691-699.
Mayer, “The ALIF Concept,” Eur Spine J., 2000, 9(1): S35-S43.
Mayer and Wiechert, “Microsurgical Anterior Approaches to the Lumbar Spine for Interbody Fusion and Total Disc Replacement,” Neurosurgery, 2002, 51(2): 159-165.
McAfee et al., “Minimally Invasive Anterior Retroperitoneal Approach to the Lumbar Spine: Emphasis on the Lateral BAK,” Spine, 1998, 23(13): 1476-1484.
Rao, et al. “Dynamic retraction of the psoas muscle to expose the lumbar spine using the retroperitoneal approach,” J. Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 5: 468-470.
Wolfla et al., “Retroperitoneal lateral lumbar interbody fusion with titanium threaded fusion cages,” J. Neurosurg (Spine 1), 2002, 96: 50-55.
Larson and Maiman, “Surgery of the Lumbar Spine,” Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 1999, pp. 305-319.
Medtronic XOMED Surgical Products, Inc., NIM-Response Nerve Integrity Monitor Intraoperative EMG Monitor User's Guide, Revision B, 2000, 47 pages.
“NuVasive's spine surgery system cleared in the US,” Pharm & Medical Industry Week, Dec. 10, 2001, 1 page.
Pimenta, “Initial Clinical Results of Direct Lateral, Minimally Invasive Access to the Lumbar Spine for Disc Nucleus Replacement Using a Novel Neurophysiological Monitoring System.” The 9th IMAST, May 2002, 1 page.
Pimenta et al., “The Lateral Endoscopic Transpsoas Retroperitoneal Approach (Letra) for Implants in the Lumbar Spine,” World Spine II—Second Interdisciplinary Congress on Spine Care, Aug. 2003, 2 pages.
Crock, H.V. MD., “Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. One Hundred Sixty Five, 1982, pp. 157-163, 13 pages.
Mayer and Brock, “Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy,” J. Neurosurg, 1993, 78: 216-225.
Schaffer and Kambin, “Percutaneous Posterolateral Lumbar Discectomy and Decompression with a 6.9-Millimeter Cannula,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1991, 73A(6): 822-831.
Friedman, “Percutaneous discectomy: An alternative to chemonucleolysis,” Neurosurgery, 1983, 13(5): 542-547.
Kossmann et al., “Minimally Invasive Vertebral Replacement with Cages in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine,” European Journal of Trauma, 2001, 27: 292-300.
Pimenta et al., “Implante de protese de nucleo pulposo: analise inicial,” Journal Brasileiro de Neurocirurgia, 2001, 12(2): 93-96.
Traynelis, “Spinal Arthroplasty,” Neurological Focus, 2002, 13(2): 12 pages.
Amended Complaint for NuVasive, Inc. v. Globus Medical, Inc., Case No. 1:10-cv-0849 (D. Del., Oct. 5, 2010), 28 pages.
Request for Inter PartesReexamination in re U.S. Pat. No. 7,819,801, dated Feb. 8, 2012, 89 pages.
Kossman et al., “The use of a retractor system (SynFrame) for open, minimal invasive reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracic and lumbar spine,” Eur Spine J, 2001, 10: 396-402.
de Peretti et al., “New possibilities in L2-L5 lumbar arthrodesis using a lateral retroperitoneal approach assisted by laparoscopy: preliminary results,” Eur Spine J, 1996, 5: 210-216.
Litwin et al., “Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the handport system,” Annals of Surgery, 2000, 231(5): 715-723.
Acland's Video Atlas of Human Anatomy, Section 3.1.7: Paravertebral Muscles. Available online: http://aclandanatomy.com/abstract/4010463. Accessed Jul. 11, 2012.
MedlinePlus, a Service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health. Available online: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/. Accessed Jul. 11, 2012.
Counterclaim Defendants' Corrected Amended Invalidity Contentions re U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,000,782; 8,005,535; 8,016,767; 8,192,356; 8,187,334; 8,361,156, D. 652,922; D. 666,294 re Case No. 3:12-cv-02738-CAB(MDD), dated Aug. 19, 2013, 30 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00034, filed Oct. 8, 2013, 65 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00035, filed Oct. 8, 2013, 65 pages.
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-00034, Oct. 7, 2013, 36 pages.
Declaration of David Hacker from IPR2014-00034, Oct. 4, 2013, 64 pages.
NuVasive, Inc's Opening Claim Construction Brief Regarding U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,000,782; 8,005,535; 8,016,767 in 8,192,356; 8,187,334; 8,361,156; D. 652,922; and 5,676,146 C2, filed Sep. 3, 2013, in Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., No. 3:12-cv-02738-CAB-MDD (S.D. Cal.)., 34 pages.
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, Ph.D. from IPR2014-00034, Oct. 7, 2013, 1056 pages.
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, Ph.D. from IPR2014-00035, Oct. 7, 2013, 661 pages.
510(K) No. K002677, approved by the FDA on Nov. 13, 2000, 634 pages.
510(K) No. K013215, approved by the FDA on Oct. 16, 2001, 376 pages.
Baulot et al., Adjuvant Anterior Spinal Fusion Via Thoracoscopy, Lyon Chirurgical, 1994, 90(5): 347-351 including English Translation and Certificate of Translation.
Leu et al., “Percutaneous Fusion of the Lumbar Spine,” Spine, 1992, 6(3): 593-604.
Rosenthal et al., “Removal of a Protruded Thoracic Disc Using Microsurgical Endoscopy,” Spine, 1994, 19(9): 1087-1091.
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00073, filed Oct. 18, 2013, 65 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00074, filed Oct. 18, 2013, 65 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00075, filed Oct. 21, 2013, 66 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00076, filed Oct. 21, 2013, 65 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00081, filed Oct. 22, 2013, 64 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00087, filed Oct. 22, 2013, 64 pages.
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-00073, Oct. 9, 2013, 36 pages.
Declaration of David Hacker, from IPR2014-00073, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/392,214, filed Jun. 26, 2002, 97 pages.
Amendment in reply to Feb. 15, 2012 Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,418, dated Mar. 16, 2012, 24 pages.
Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination Control No. 95/001,247, dated Mar. 18, 2013, 49 pages.
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-00074, Oct. 9, 2013, 36 pages.
Declaration of David Hacker, from IPR2014-00074, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages.
Declaration of David Hacker, from IPR2014-00075, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages.
Amendment in reply to Action of Feb. 7, 2011 and Notice of May 12, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,284, dated May 17, 2011, 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,284, dated Jul. 18, 2011, 8 pages.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,284, dated Feb. 7, 2011, 10 pages.
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, p. 65 (10th ed. 1998).
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-00076, Oct. 9, 2013, 36 pages.
Moed et al., “Evaluation of Intraoperative Nerve-Monitoring During Insertion of an Iliosacral Implant in an Animal Model, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,” 1999, 81-A(11): 9.
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-0081, Oct. 9, 2013, 36 pages.
Declaration of David Hacker from IPR2014-00081, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/325,424, filed Sep. 25, 2001, 346 pages.
Declaration of Lee Grant, from IPR2014-0087, Oct. 9, 2013, 36 pages.
Declaration of David Hacker from IPR2014-00087, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages.
Declaration of Robert G. Watkins, from IPR2014-00073, Oct. 18, 2013, 1101 pages.
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, from IPR2014-00073, Oct. 12, 2013, 1226 pages.
Declaration of Robert G. Watkins, from IPR2014-00074, Oct. 18, 2013, 548 pages.
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, from IPR2014-00074, Oct. 12, 2013, 565 pages.
Declaration of Robert G. Watkins, from IPR2014-00075, Oct. 18, 2013, 674 pages.
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, from IPR2014-00075, Oct. 12, 2013, 1107 pages.
Declaration of Robert G. Watkins, from IPR2014-00076, Oct. 18, 2013, 543 pages.
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, from IPR2014-00076, Oct. 12, 2013, 1247 pages.
Declaration of David Hacker, from IPR2014-00076, Oct. 10, 2013, 64 pages.
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz, from IPR2014-0081, Oct. 21, 2013, 585 pages.
Declaration of Daniel Schwartz from IPR2014-0087, Oct. 21, 2013, 585 pages.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00034, dated Jan. 15, 2014, 66 pages.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00034, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 35 pages.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00035, dated Jan. 15, 2014, 42 pages.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00035, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 12 pages.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00073, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 46 pages.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00073, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 34 pages.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00074, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 68 pages.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00074, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 28 pages.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00075, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 54 pages.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00075, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 23 pages.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00076, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 58 pages.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00076, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 11 pages.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00081, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 47 pages.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00081, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 31 pages.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc's Preliminary Response from IPR2014-00087, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 51 pages.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision from IPR 2014-00087, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 31 pages.
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00034, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 48 pages.
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00073, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 36 pages.
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00074, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 31 pages.
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00075, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 39 pages.
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00081, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 44 pages.
Final Written Decision from IPR 2014-00087, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 36 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140148650 A1 May 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60450806 Feb 2003 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10789797 Feb 2004 US
Child 12632373 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 13756951 Feb 2013 US
Child 14171347 US
Parent 13668504 Nov 2012 US
Child 13756951 US
Parent 13030798 Feb 2011 US
Child 13668504 US
Parent 12632373 Dec 2009 US
Child 13030798 US