Surgical bur with non-paired flutes

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11439410
  • Patent Number
    11,439,410
  • Date Filed
    Monday, December 16, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 13, 2022
    2 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • CPC
    • A61B17/16
    • A61B17/1615
    • A61B17/1617
  • International Classifications
    • A61B17/16
    • Disclaimer
      This patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer.
      Term Extension
      272
Abstract
A surgical dissection tool for cutting bone and other tissue includes a cutting head having an outer surface having non-paired or an odd number of flutes formed therein. Each flute includes a rake surface intersecting with the outer surface to form a cutting edge, and a relief surface opposite the rake surface. The relief surface and the rake surface form a first angle. Each flute also includes a leading angled surface extending from the relief surface to a distal end portion of the cutting head, the leading angled surface and the rake surface forming a second angle substantially the same as the first angle.
Description
FIELD

The disclosure is directed to a surgical system for bone cutting or shaping and more particularly, to a surgical dissection tool of the surgical system.


BACKGROUND

During surgical procedures using cutting tools, surgeons often balance aggressiveness of cutting tools with the ability to precisely control the cutting tool. As a surgeon controls the cutting instruments to increase aggressiveness, potentially decreasing the time period of the surgical procedure, the surgeon may have less precise control. While non-aggressive cutting may be more precise, it may increase the time period of the surgical procedure.


A part of the reduced precision during aggressive cutting may be the result of tool chatter. Tool chatter may occur for several reasons. One reason is the spacing of the flutes. A cutting tool with “paired” flutes or an even number of flutes may chatter as a result of one cutting edge engaging tissue at the same time that another cutting edge is disengaging from tissue or may manifest when the cutting depth of multiple engaged flutes vary, producing asymmetric forces. In addition, tool chatter may result from an inability of tissue in the flutes to exit the flute before the flute reengages tissue. This may be compounded during aggressive cutting that can result in relatively large slices of tissue.


The present disclosure is directed to a surgical system for bone cutting or shaping addressing one or more of the limitations in the prior art.


SUMMARY

In one exemplary aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a surgical dissection tool for cutting bone and other tissue. The dissection tool may include a distal end portion and a proximal end portion. A shank may extend between the distal end portion and the proximal end portion. A cutting head disposed at the distal end portion connects to the shank. It has an outer surface having an odd number of flutes formed therein. Each flute includes a rake surface intersecting with the outer surface to form a cutting edge, and a relief surface opposite the rake surface. The relief surface and the rake surface form a first angle. Each flute also includes a leading angled surface extending from the relief surface to a distal end portion of the cutting head, the leading angled surface and the rake surface forming a second angle substantially the same as the first angle.


In one aspect, the odd number of flutes comprises three flutes. In another aspect, the first and second angles are obtuse angles. In another aspect, the leading angled surface comprises one of a chamfer and a round. In another aspect, the flute further comprises a bevel between the leading angled surface and the rake surface.


In another exemplary aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a surgical dissection tool for cutting bone and other tissue that includes a shank and a cutting head connected to the shank. The cutting head and shank have a central longitudinal axis, and the cutting head has an outer surface having an odd number of flutes formed therein. Each flute may include a planar rake surface intersecting with the outer surface to form a cutting edge and may include a planar relief surface opposite the rake surface. The planar rake surface and the planar relief surface form an obtuse angle. A leading angled surface may extend from the planar relief surface to a distal end portion of the outer surface, and the leading angled surface of at least one of the flutes includes a distal-most end extending past the longitudinal axis.


In another exemplary aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a surgical dissection tool for cutting bone and other tissue that includes a shank and a cutting head connected to the shank. The cutting head and shank may have a central longitudinal axis and an outer surface. The outer surface may be substantially spherically shaped and may have three flutes formed therein. The outer surface between adjacent flutes of the three flutes forms an angle within a range of about 45-55 degrees. Each flute of the three flutes includes a planar rake surface intersecting with the outer surface to form a cutting edge. The planar rake surface is parallel to and offset from a reference plane through the longitudinal axis. Each flute also includes a planar relief surface opposite the rake surface and intersecting with the outer surface. The planar relief surface may extend to a proximal portion of the cutting head, the planar rake surface and the planar relief surface may form a first obtuse angle within a range of about 95 and 105 degrees. A leading angled surface may extend from the planar relief surface to a distal end portion of the outer surface. The leading angled surface and the planar relief surface may form a second angle substantially the same as the first obtuse angle. The leading angled surface of at least one of the three flutes may include a distal-most end extending past the longitudinal axis.


In another exemplary aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a surgical system having a surgical dissection cutter assembly with a surgical dissection tool as described herein.





DRAWINGS

The A more complete understanding of the present disclosure and advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures.



FIG. 1 is an illustration of a surgical dissection cutter assembly according to the present invention use in a human patient.



FIG. 2 is an illustration of partially exploded perspective view of a surgical dissection cutter assembly including a driver and a surgical dissection tool according to the present invention.



FIG. 3 is an illustration of an isometric view of a distal end of a surgical dissection tool according to one exemplary aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 4 is an illustration of a side view of a surgical dissection tool according to one exemplary aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 5 is an illustration of an end view of a distal end of a surgical dissection tool according to one exemplary aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 6 is an illustration of a side view of a distal end of a surgical dissection tool according to one exemplary aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 7 is an illustration of another side view of a distal end of a surgical dissection tool of FIG. 6, rotated from the position in FIG. 6 according to one exemplary aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 8 is an illustration of an end view of a distal end of a surgical dissection tool according to one exemplary aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 9 is an illustration of an isometric view of a distal end of a surgical dissection tool according to another exemplary aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 10 is an illustration of a side view of a surgical dissection tool according to one exemplary aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 11 is an illustration of another side view of a surgical dissection tool according to one exemplary aspect of the present disclosure, rotated from the side view shown in FIG. 10.



FIG. 12 is an illustration of an end view of a distal end of a surgical dissection tool according to one exemplary aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 13 is an illustration of an end view of a distal end of a surgical dissection tool as it relates to bone tissue cutting a path in the tissue according to one exemplary aspect of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference is now made in detail to exemplary embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.


The present disclosure is directed to a surgical dissection cutter assembly including a dissection tool driver that drives a surgical dissection tool during surgical procedures. The dissection tool may provide increased cutting control and cutting precision by reducing the incidence of chatter during cutting. This may permit a surgeon to make more aggressive dissections without compromising control and cutting precision. In turn, this may reduce the length of time required for some surgical procedures, benefitting the patient. In addition, reduced chatter may result in smoother cuts, which may increase healing and reduce recovery times.


The exemplary dissection tool disclosed herein is a surgical bur having non-paired flutes. As such, the flutes themselves are not spaced precisely 180 degrees apart. The offset flutes appear to provide a benefit of reduced chatter while still permitting relatively aggressive cutting. The advantage may derive from the offset in timing between the time one flute engages to cut tissue as another disengages the tissue during a single revolution of the dissection bur.



FIG. 1 shows a human patient A undergoing a neurological operation. As is common practice, access to the brain or other neurological structures often requires delicate dissection of bone and other tissues to gain access. By way of example, a dissection cutter assembly employing a dissection tool driver 10 in accordance with one aspect of the present invention is shown being utilized to dissect a portion of patient A's bone and other tissue adjacent to the surgical access site.



FIG. 2 illustrates the dissection tool driver 10 for the dissection of bone or other tissue in greater detail. The dissection tool driver 10 includes a motor housing 12, coupled to an air supply and hose assembly 14 that supplies pressurized air to a motor in the motor housing 12 and vents the low pressure exhaust air away from the surgical site. The dissection tool driver 10 further includes an attachment housing 16 that connects to a dissection tool 100. The dissection tool 100 is described in greater detail with reference to FIGS. 3-5.



FIG. 3 shows an isometric view of a distal end portion, FIG. 4 shows a side view of the dissection tool 100, and FIG. 5 shows an end view of the distal end portion. Referring to these figures, the dissection tool 100 is, in this example, a surgical bur that includes a proximal end portion 102 and a distal end portion 104 connected by an extending shank or shaft 106. The shank 106 has a longitudinal axis 108 defining a centerline of the proximal end portion 102 and the distal end portion 104. In one embodiment, the shank 106 includes a diameter within a range of about 0.030-0.150 inch.


The proximal end portion 102 is arranged to engage with and be driven by a shaft in the motor portion 12, but passes through and is supported by the attachment housing 16 in FIG. 2. In this example, the proximal end portion 102 includes a first non-circular region 112 when viewed in cross-section, a second non-circular region 114 when viewed in cross-section, and an intermediate region 116. In this example, the first and second non-circular regions 112, 114 are shown as hex-shaped surfaces and have the same cross-sectional shape. These regions are configured to engage with a driving portion of the dissection tool driver 10. The intermediate region 116 has a smaller cross-sectional area than the first and second non-circular regions 112, 114. It may be used to engage with or be engaged by the dissection tool driver 10 to anchor or otherwise secure the dissection tool 100 in the dissection tool driver 10. In this example, the intermediate region 116 is has a circular cross-section with a diameter smaller than the smallest cross-sectional width of the first non-circular region 112.


The distal end portion 104 includes a cutting head 120 connected to the shank 106. The transverse cross-section of the cutting head 120 is greater than the diameter of the shank 106. The cutting head 120 is shown as a surgical cutting bur with an outer surface 122. In this example, the outer surface 122 is substantially spherically shaped. In other embodiments, the cutting head 120 may have a cross-section smaller than at least a portion of the shank 106. In one embodiment, the shank 106 includes a neck with a curved or tapered surface that extends to the cutting head 120.


The cutting head 120 is formed with three symmetric cutting flutes 124 formed into the outer surface 122 and evenly spaced about the cutting head 120. Each cutting flute 124 includes a rake surface 126 forming a cutting edge 128 with the outer surface 122, and includes a relief surface 130 adjacent the rake surface 126. A distal region of the cutting head 120 includes a leading angled surface shown as a chamfer portion 132 leading to the relief surface 130. A bevel 134 connects the chamfer portion 132 to the rake surface 126. As can be seen, the cutting edge 120 forms a smooth arc from the distal-most portion of the spherical cutting head 120 to the proximal side of the cutting head 120.


In this example, the rake surface 126 is a planar surface across its length. Here, the rake surface 126 is offset from but parallel to a plane passing through the longitudinal axis 108. Accordingly, the rake surface 126 lies in a plane that does not intersect the center-line or longitudinal axis 108 of the dissection tool 100. While shown as being offset after the centerline, in other embodiments, the rake surface 126 is offset from but parallel to a plane before or in front of a plane passing through the longitudinal axis to impart a desired rake angle. In one embodiment the rake surface is disposed so that a plane through the rake angle intersects the axis for a neutral rake angle. Although shown as planar, in other embodiments, the rake surface 126 surface is angled or formed by a helix.


The relief surface 130 forms the opposing side of the flute 124 and, together with the rake surface 126, forms an angle .theta. within a range of about 85-120 degrees, although additional angles are contemplated. In one embodiment, the angle .theta. is within a range of about 95-105 degrees and in another embodiment, the angle is about 100 degrees. The relief surface extends from the chamfer portion 132 to a proximal portion of the cutting head 120. Different embodiments of the dissection tool 100 include angles between the rake surface 126 and the relief surface 130 that are acute, right or obtuse. In some embodiments, the angle .theta. is within the range of about 90.degree. and 100.degree.


As best seen in FIG. 4, the chamfer portion 132 angles from the relief surface 130 to a distal end of the cutting head 120. In the example shown, the chamfer portion 132 is cut at an angle a measured from a line traverse to the axis 108 to fall between about 20 and 70 degrees. In one example, the chamfer portion 132 is formed with an angle .alpha. between the range of about 35-45 degrees, and in one example, the angle .alpha. is about 40 degrees. The angle .alpha. is formed so that the end of the chamfer portion 132 extends past the centerline or axis 108, as can be seen in FIG. 4. In addition, in the embodiment shown, the chamfer portion 132 is formed relative to the rake surface 126 to form an angle that substantially corresponds to the angle .theta.0 formed between the relief surface 130 and the rake surface 126.



FIG. 5 shows how the bevel 134 intersects with the outer surface 122 of the cutting head 120 to form a leading surface with the outer surface 122 at the distal most end of the cutting head. The bevel 134 angles the cutting edge 128 so that each flute 124 is independent of and does not intersect the other flutes, even though they each extend past the centerline or axis 108. In the embodiment shown, the cutting head 120, albeit spherically shaped, includes a truncated proximal end that is brazed to the shank 106.



FIGS. 6-8 show an additional embodiment of a dissection tool, referenced here by the numeral 200. Some of the sizes, angles, and shapes of features of the dissection tool 200 are similar to those described above, and will not be repeated here. The dissection tool 200 includes a shank 206 and a proximal end similar to the shank and proximal end discussed above with reference to the dissection tool 100. Therefore, these will not be described further here.


The dissection tool 200 includes a cutting head 220 with a spherical outer surface 222 having three cutting flutes 224a-c formed therein, with each cutting flute 224a-c having a respective planar rake surface 226a-c that intersects the outer surface 222 to form a respective cutting edge 228a-c. A relief surface 230a-c forms an opposing wall to each respective rake surface 226a-c of each cutting flute 224a-c. As described above, in one embodiment, the rake surfaces 226 are parallel to, but offset from a plane through the centerline or axis 208. In other embodiments, the rake surfaces 226 form planes that pass through the centerline or axis 208.


Instead of having identical flutes as disclosed with reference to the dissection tool 100, the dissection tool 200 includes cutting flutes that vary from each other. In this example, each cutting flute 224a-c includes a respective leading angled surface shown as a chamfer or a round 232a-c extending from its most distal end to the relief surface 230. The chamfers or rounds 232a-c of each flute 224a-c, however, have different depths or curvatures. This can be understood with reference to FIG. 6 where each chamfer or round is different sized.



FIGS. 7 and 8 each show an illustration of a side view of the cutting head 220 showing the curvature along the different flutes of the dissection tool 200. FIG. 7 shows the profile of the relief surface 230a and the chamfer or round 232a. FIG. 8 shows the profile of the relief surface 230c and the chamfer or round 232c. As can be seen by comparison, the chamfer or round 232a in FIG. 7 is substantially larger than the chamfer or round 232c in FIG. 8. As can be seen in FIG. 7, the leading angled surface comprises both a chamfer and a round. The round connects the chamfer and the relief surface 230a. Furthermore, the rake surface 228 continues the full length of the relief surface 230 and the chamfer or round 232. That is, the dissection tool 200 does not include a bevel surface. However, since the chamfer or round 232 varies by flute in the exemplary tool 200, the surface area of the rake surface also varies from flute to flute. As can be seen by comparing FIGS. 7 and 8, the area of the rake surface 226a is greater than the area of the rake surface 226c. Similarly, the length of the cutting edge varies from flute to flute, and the cutting edge 228a is greater than that of the cutting edge 228c. In addition, chamfer or round 232a in the cutting flute 224a extends past the centerline or axis 208 as shown in FIG. 7, while the cutting flutes 224b and 224c do not extend past the centerline or axis 208.



FIGS. 9-12 show an additional embodiment of a dissection tool, referenced here by the numeral 300. Some of the sizes, angles, and shapes of features of the dissection tool 300 are similar to those described above, and will not be repeated here. The dissection tool 300 includes a shank 306 and a proximal end similar to the shanks and proximal ends discussed above.


The dissection tool 300 includes a cutting head 320 with an outer surface 322 having three cutting flutes 324 formed therein, with each cutting flute 324 having a respective rake surface 326 that intersects the outer surface 322 to form a respective cutting edge 328. Here, the cutting flutes 324 are substantially identically shaped and therefore, are all referred to by the same reference numeral.


In this embodiment, the rake surface 326 is helix shaped, with a leading portion 340 and a trailing portion 342. The helix angle increases the effective shearing action thus reducing cutting forces and the amount of heat generated during the bone cutting process. Chip ejection also may be improved. During cutting, as the bur rotates about the longitudinal axis 308, the leading portion 340 is the first portion to engage the bone tissue during a cutting action and the trailing portion 342 follows the leading portion 340. This may provide additional stability during cutting to the three-flute bur because resistance from the bone tissue is applied through a progressive siding action. This makes the cutting forces more constant with less chance for chatter. Instead of the whole cutting edge of a flute engaging the bone at once, the helix makes the leading portion 340 engage the bone first, and the remainder of the cutting edge engages bone over a very short period of time. This reduces both vibration and dampening, resulting in greater levels of stability.


In this embodiment, the leading portions 340 of the respective rake surfaces 326 are parallel to, but offset from a front of a plane through the centerline or axis 308. In other embodiments, the leading portions 340 of the rake surfaces 326 form planes that pass through the centerline or axis 308 or that are behind a plane through a centerline or axis 308. As can be seen in FIG. 12, the leading edge extends in front of and past the centerpoint.



FIG. 12 shows an end view of the dissection tool 300 with a reference boundary 346 creating a circle that intersects the cutting edges 328 of the dissection tool 300. Although shown in cross-section as a line, in one example, the reference boundary 346 is a spherical boundary interesting the cutting edges 328. The cutting edges 328 of the dissection tool 300 intersect with the spherical reference boundary 346. However, in cross-section, the outer surface 322 gradually tapers inwardly from the reference boundary 346. As can be seen in FIG. 12, the outer surface 322 includes a tapered portion 348 followed by a curved portion 350. The tapered portion 348 extends from the cutting edge rearward along the outer surface 322. The tapered portion 348 is followed by a curved portion 350 that is formed with a changing radius as an Archimedes spiral or a cam surface. The cam relief formed as a result of the tapers portion and the curved portion 350 is labeled with the reference numeral 351. This provides the greatest clearance permitting the bur to advance into the bone tissue without excessive interference from the outer surface 322 engaging the newly cut surface. This can help reduce heating that may occur if the outer surface were to be engaged with or rubbing on the bone tissue.


A relief surface 330 forms an opposing wall to each respective rake surface 326 of each cutting flute 324. In the embodiment of the dissection tool 300, the flutes 324 are all substantially identical, and are similar to the rake surfaces described above. A reference line 352 identifies a web thickness of the cutting head 320. The web thickness is the minimum diameter of the solid portion of the cutting head. When using three flutes as shown in FIG. 12, the web thickness has a radius equal to about half of the radius to the cutting edges 328. Other embodiments have a web thickness that is either higher and lower. In one embodiment, the web thickness radius is within a range of about 40% to 80% of the radius to the cutting edges 328.



FIGS. 10-11 each show an illustration of a side view of the cutting head 320 showing the curvature along the different flutes of the dissection tool 300. FIG. 10 shows the profile of the relief surface 330c and the chamfer or round 332c. FIG. 11 shows the profile of the rake surface 326 and the cutting edge 328. As can be seen by comparison, the rake surface 328 forms a helix that extends from the leading portion 340 to the trailing portion 342.



FIG. 13 shows the exemplary surgical dissection tool 300 in a cutting environment. In this view, a bottom view of the cutting tool 300 cuts a path in bone tissue structure 370, with the bone tissue structure 370 being transparent in order to display the cutting tool.


In FIG. 13, the cutting edge 328 of the dissection tool 300 is shown engaged in and cutting material from the bone structure 370. The cutting edge 328 is also just engaging into the bone structure 370. As can be seen, at this point in time, there are only two cutting edges 328 engaged in the bone structure 370. The third cutting edge 328 moved out of engagement with the bone structure. Because the flutes are offset and not directly across from each other, the cutting edge 328 moves out of contact with the bone structure before the cutting edge 328 engages the bone structure. The time differential between the time one cutting edge engages tissue and a separate cutting edge disengages the tissue during a single revolution of the dissection bur may provide advantages in decreased chatter. Accordingly, at any single point in time, only two out of the three cutting edges are in contact with the bone structure.


Although the exemplary dissection tools are burs with three flutes, the dissection tools may have additional non-paired flutes. For example, one example of the dissection tool includes five flutes. In use, the odd number of flutes may result in a reduced level of chatter during bone or cutting. Since cutting occurs by rotating the dissection tool about its longitudinal axis, the odd number of flutes offsets the timing of initial cutting edge engagement and cutting edge disengagement. This offset in timing is thought to reduce the incidence of chatter while still permitting aggressive cutting action. Furthermore, since at least one of the flutes has a cutting edge that extends past the longitudinal axis or centerline, the angle that the cutter is held at by the surgeon is not as critical as it might otherwise be.


It is evident that the particular illustrative embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A surgical dissection tool for cutting bone and other tissue, comprising: a distal end portion;a proximal end portion;a shank extending between the distal end portion and the proximal end portion,a cutting head at the distal end portion connected to the shank, the outer surface having an odd number of flutes formed therein, each flute comprising: a rake surface having at least a planar portion and intersecting with the outer surface to form a cutting edge, the planar portion is parallel to and offset from a reference plane through a longitudinal axis of the cutting head;a relief surface opposite the rake surface; anda leading angled surface extending from the relief surface to a distal end portion of the cutting head.
  • 2. The surgical dissection tool of claim 1, wherein the odd number of flutes consists of three flutes.
  • 3. The surgical dissection tool of claim 2, wherein each of the flutes is substantially identical.
  • 4. The surgical dissection tool of claim 1, wherein the relief surface and the rake surface form a first obtuse angle.
  • 5. The surgical dissection tool of claim 1, wherein the flute further comprises a bevel between the leading angled surface and the rake surface.
  • 6. The surgical dissection tool of claim 5, wherein the flute further comprises a bevel between the leading angled surface and the distal end portion of the outer surface.
  • 7. The surgical dissection tool of claim 2, wherein the three flutes include three cutting edges that are configured so that during cutting at any single point in time, only two out of three cutting edges are in contact with the bone.
  • 8. The surgical dissection tool of claim 1, wherein the outer surface is spherically shaped.
  • 9. The surgical dissection tool of claim 1, wherein the planar portion of the rake surface is behind the reference plane through the longitudinal axis of the cutting head.
  • 10. The surgical dissection tool of claim 1, wherein a distal end of the leading surface portion extends past the longitudinal axis.
  • 11. The surgical dissection tool of claim 1, wherein the leading angled surface comprises one of a chamfer and a round.
  • 12. The surgical dissection tool of claim 1, wherein the outer surface from a distal end view includes a tapered portion followed by a curved portion formed with a changing radii of curvature to create a cam surface.
  • 13. A surgical dissection tool for cutting bone and other tissue, comprising: a shank;a cutting head connected to the shank, the cutting head and shank having a central longitudinal axis and having a spherical outer surface with an odd number of flutes formed therein, each flute comprising: a planar rake surface intersecting with the spherical outer surface to form a cutting edge;a planar relief surface opposite the rake surface, the planar rake surface and the planar relief surface forming an obtuse angle; anda leading angled surface extending from the planar relief surface to a distal end portion of the outer surface,wherein the leading angled surface of at least one of the flutes includes a distal-most end extending past the longitudinal axis.
  • 14. The surgical dissection tool of claim 13, wherein the odd number of flutes consists of three substantially identical flutes.
  • 15. The surgical dissection tool of claim 13, wherein the outer surface from a distal end view includes a tapered portion followed by a curved portion formed with a changing radii of curvature to create a cam surface.
  • 16. The surgical dissection tool of claim 13, wherein the three flutes include three cutting edges that are configured so that during cutting at any single point in time, only two out of three cutting edges are in contact with the bone.
  • 17. The surgical dissection tool of claim 13, wherein the leading angled surface and the rake surface form an obtuse angle.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/935,459 filed on Mar. 26, 2018, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/992,400 filed Jan. 11, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,924,952 issued on Mar. 27, 2018, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/447,372 filed on Apr. 16, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,232,952 issued on Jan. 12, 2016. The entire disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (143)
Number Name Date Kind
180554 Cubberley Aug 1876 A
372400 Browne Nov 1887 A
533573 Wilkens Feb 1895 A
533673 Wilkens Feb 1895 A
662349 Burton Nov 1900 A
1309706 Taylor Jul 1919 A
2795979 Zerwick Jun 1957 A
2847885 Wagner Aug 1958 A
2847895 Wagner Aug 1958 A
2903922 Ernst Sep 1959 A
3387511 Ackart, Sr. Jun 1968 A
3387554 Cherre Jun 1968 A
3872594 Gerteisen Mar 1975 A
3937222 Banko Feb 1976 A
4445509 Auth May 1984 A
4594034 Maier Jun 1986 A
4600006 Baker Jul 1986 A
4602900 Arpaio, Jr. et al. Jul 1986 A
4699550 Baker Oct 1987 A
4740121 Arnold Apr 1988 A
4803982 Baker Feb 1989 A
4830000 Shutt May 1989 A
4951690 Baker Aug 1990 A
4975003 Hosoi Dec 1990 A
4978350 Wagenknecht Dec 1990 A
5007911 Baker Apr 1991 A
5011342 Hsu Apr 1991 A
5122134 Borzone et al. Jun 1992 A
5143490 Kopras Sep 1992 A
5190548 Davis Mar 1993 A
5209612 Kish May 1993 A
5236291 Agapiou et al. Aug 1993 A
5302059 Fabiano Apr 1994 A
5336673 Moon et al. Aug 1994 A
5429504 Peltier et al. Jul 1995 A
5467837 Miller et al. Nov 1995 A
5514141 Prizzi, Jr. May 1996 A
5575650 Niznick et al. Nov 1996 A
5579185 Tsai et al. Nov 1996 A
D378780 Shuler Apr 1997 S
5618293 Sample et al. Apr 1997 A
5658305 Baker Aug 1997 A
5759185 Grinberg Jun 1998 A
5810517 Bostic Sep 1998 A
5833402 Martin Nov 1998 A
5846035 Karafillis et al. Dec 1998 A
5855581 Koblish et al. Jan 1999 A
5860773 Blomberg et al. Jan 1999 A
5913867 Dion Jun 1999 A
5964553 Blomberg et al. Oct 1999 A
5980525 Bryant et al. Nov 1999 A
6068632 Carchidi et al. May 2000 A
6132448 Perez et al. Oct 2000 A
6238398 Lechot May 2001 B1
6258093 Edwards et al. Jul 2001 B1
6332886 Green et al. Dec 2001 B1
6431801 Vasudeva et al. Aug 2002 B2
6435780 Flynn Aug 2002 B1
6511493 Moutafis et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514258 Brown et al. Feb 2003 B1
6547495 Meece et al. Apr 2003 B2
6562046 Sasso May 2003 B2
6579298 Bruneau et al. Jun 2003 B1
6682349 Logeart Jan 2004 B1
6783533 Green et al. Aug 2004 B2
7520703 Rompel Apr 2009 B2
7862263 van Iperen Jan 2011 B2
8414228 Wells et al. Apr 2013 B2
8460298 O'Donoghue Jun 2013 B2
8852222 O'Sullivan Oct 2014 B2
9179923 Gubellini et al. Nov 2015 B2
9232952 Kulas et al. Jan 2016 B2
9526508 Burke et al. Dec 2016 B2
9883873 Kulas et al. Feb 2018 B2
9924952 Kulas et al. Mar 2018 B2
9955981 Kulas et al. May 2018 B2
10265082 Vu et al. Apr 2019 B2
10335166 Kulas et al. Jul 2019 B2
10507028 Kulas et al. Dec 2019 B2
10786266 Kulas et al. Sep 2020 B2
20030097133 Green et al. May 2003 A1
20040057803 Walrath Mar 2004 A1
20050053439 Wang et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050203526 Ellis Sep 2005 A1
20050272004 Desrosiers Dec 2005 A1
20050273107 Stevens Dec 2005 A1
20050283160 Knisely et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060045639 Flynn et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060067797 Calamia Mar 2006 A1
20060085005 Kenealy et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060129061 Kaneto et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142775 Heneberry et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060269372 Goshima Nov 2006 A1
20070010822 Zalenski et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070160437 Shultz et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070163416 Burgess Jul 2007 A1
20070213736 Ducharme Sep 2007 A1
20070280792 Kochan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070298376 Kmiecz et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080132929 O'Sullivan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140078 Nelson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080167653 Watlington et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080177294 O'Neil et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080193234 Davancens et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215148 Lesinski et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090023988 Korner et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024129 Gordon et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090048602 O'Donoghue Feb 2009 A1
20090138015 Conner et al. May 2009 A1
20090216235 Ellis Aug 2009 A1
20090222009 Ellis Sep 2009 A1
20090264888 Neumeyer et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100054884 Masuda et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100057087 Cha Mar 2010 A1
20100121365 O'Sullivan et al. May 2010 A1
20100145341 Ranck et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100178631 Gordils Wallis et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100209200 Delacretaz Aug 2010 A1
20100286695 Hannani et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110015634 Smith et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110054884 Drakwall et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110098710 Spratt et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110112540 McLean et al. May 2011 A1
20110208194 Steiner et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110211922 Maeda et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238070 Santangelo et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238099 Loreth Sep 2011 A1
20120063860 Wada et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120150209 Gubellini et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158028 O'Sullivan et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120330315 Ranck et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130028677 Schwaegert et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130051937 Volokh et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130166034 Landon Jun 2013 A1
20130274779 Kulas et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140058423 Smith et al. Feb 2014 A1
20150025559 Kulas et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150173776 Burke et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150297243 Kulas et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160287267 Kulas et al. Oct 2016 A1
20180153562 Kulas et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180206855 Kulas et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180242986 Kulas et al. Aug 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (41)
Number Date Country
101745679 Jun 2010 CN
201565651 Sep 2010 CN
204562293 Aug 2015 CN
19826276 Nov 1999 DE
102010010589 Sep 2011 DE
0332437 Aug 1990 EP
1872739 Jan 2008 EP
2561822 Feb 2013 EP
3698731 Aug 2020 EP
2452158 Feb 2009 GB
H06155126 Jun 1994 JP
H07108409 Apr 1995 JP
10-263914 Oct 1998 JP
H10-263914 Oct 1998 JP
2003291024 Oct 2003 JP
2003291024 Oct 2003 JP
2005125465 May 2005 JP
2006512214 Apr 2006 JP
2006523542 Oct 2006 JP
2008501541 Jan 2008 JP
200923055 Feb 2009 JP
2010-510042 Apr 2010 JP
2013502943 Jan 2013 JP
2013527781 Jul 2013 JP
2013166232 Aug 2013 JP
2014-121194 Jun 2014 JP
2006026482 Mar 2006 WO
2007010389 Jan 2007 WO
2008061711 May 2008 WO
2008064350 May 2008 WO
2009063261 May 2009 WO
2010061933 Jun 2010 WO
2011023381 Mar 2011 WO
2011132876 Oct 2011 WO
2012083468 Jun 2012 WO
2013056262 Apr 2013 WO
2013151770 Oct 2013 WO
2013158469 Oct 2013 WO
2014037518 Mar 2014 WO
2015009810 Jan 2015 WO
2015160884 Oct 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (81)
Entry
Office Action regarding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7003354 (with English Translation), dated Apr. 2, 2021.
Third Office Action regarding corresponding Chinese Application No. 201680031174.1 (With English Translation), dated May 6, 2021.
Australian Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2015 for AU Application No. 2013249626 for PCT/US2013/036269 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,372, filed Apr. 16, 2012.
Australian Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2018 in corresponding/related Australian Application No. 2014290106.
Australian Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2017 for AU Application No. 2015247768.
Australian Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2018 in corresponding/related Australian Application No. 2016234968.
Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2015 for Canadian Application No. 2,870,689 claiming benefit of PCT/US2013/036269.
Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2016 for CA Application No. 2870689 for PCT/US2013/036269 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,372, filed Apr. 16, 2012.
Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2017 in corresponding/related Canadian Application No. 2,945,806.
Canadian Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2018 in corresponding/related Canadian Application No. 2,917,601.
Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2018 in corresponding/related Canadian Application No. 2,945,806.
Canadian Office Action dated May 1, 2017 for CA Application No. 2,917,601.
Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2015 for Canadian Application 2,870,689 claiming benefit of International Application PCT/US2013/036269 claiming benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,372, filed Apr. 16, 2012.
Chinese Office Action (English translation) dated May 24, 2016 for Chinese Application No. 2013800311659 which claims benefit of PCT/2013/036269 filed Apr. 12, 2013.
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2018 in corresponding/related Chinese Application No. 201710146560.1.
End Mill and Cutting Tool Design Criteria and Technical Features. Melin Tool Company. Retrieved from <http://www.endmill.com/pages/training/design.html> on Jun. 14, 2013. (pp. 1-4).
European Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2015 for EP Application No. 13720176.0-1654.
European Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2017 in corresponding European Application No. 14747254.2.
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2017 in corresponding European Application No. 17151461.5.
Find Your Perfect Balance. Midas Rex Legend 7.5. cm Attachments and Tools. Medtronic brochure. (2012) 3 pages.
Innovations 2005 catalog, Komet Gebr. Brasseler GmbH & Co., KG, Lemgo, Germany, 28 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jan. 19, 2016 for PCT/US2014/046827, claiming priority to U.S. Appl. No. 13/944,650, filed Jul. 17, 2013.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jan. 28, 2016 for PCT/US2014/046827 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/944,650, filed Jul. 17, 2013.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Oct. 30, 2014 for PCT/US2013/036269, claiming priority to U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,372, filed Apr. 16, 2012.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 27, 2016 for Application No. PCT/US2015/025867 filed Apr. 15, 2015.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 15, 2018 in corresponding/related International Application No. PCT/US2016/049464.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 12, 2017 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2016/023349.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 3, 2017 for PCT/US2016/049464 claiming benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 14/840,217, filed Aug. 31, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 25, 2016 for PCT/US2016/023349 which claims benefit the benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 14/674,002, filed Mar. 31, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 28, 2013 for PCT/US2013/036269, claiming priority to U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,372, filed Apr. 16, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 19, 2016 for Application No. PCT/US2014/046827 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/944,650, filed Jul. 17, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 28, 2016 for Application No. PCT/US2014/046827 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/944,650, filed Jul. 17, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 25, 2016 for Application No. PCT/US2014/046827 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/944,650, filed Jul. 17, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 10, 2014 for PCT/US2014/046827 claiming benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/944,650, filed Jul. 17, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 22, 2015 corresponding to PCT/US2015/025867 filed Apr. 15, 2015.
Japanese Office Action corresponding to Japanese Application No. 2016-562744 dated Sep. 4, 2019.
Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2015 for Japanese Application 2015-507064 claiming benefit of PCT/US2014/046827 claiming benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/944,650, filed Jul. 17, 2013.
Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2018 in corresponding/related Japanese Application No. 2016-527065.
Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2016 for Japanese Application No. 2015-50764 claiming benefit of PCT/US2013/036269 claiming benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,372, filed Apr. 12, 2013 with English translation.
Komet Burs mini catalogue 2007, Henry Schein Halas, www.henryschein.com.au, 19 pages.
Komet Surgery catalog, Mar. 2011, 8 pages.
Korean Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2016 for KR Application No. 10-2014-7031869 for PCT/US2013/036269 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,372, filed Apr. 16, 2012 with English translation.
Korean Office Action for KR Patent Application No. 10-2014-7031869 dated Mar. 16, 2016.
Korean Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2018 in corresponding/related Chinese Application No. 10-2017-7031086.
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2018 in corresponding/related Korean Application No. 10-2016-7031697.
Korean Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2018 in corresponding/related Korean Application No. 10-2016-7031697.
Korean Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2016 for Korean Application No. 10-2014-7031869 corresponding to PCT/US2013/036269 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,372, filed Apr. 16, 2012 with English translation.
Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2019 in corresponding/related Canadian Application No. 2945806.
Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2019 in corresponding/related European Application No. 18191962.2.
Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2019 in corresponding Canadian Application No. 2,945,806.
Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2019 in corresponding/related Japanese Application No. 2016-562744.
Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2019 in corresponding/related Australian Application No. 2016244068.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,372, U.S. Pat. No. 9,232,952, filed Apr. 16, 2012, Kulas et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/992,400, U.S. Pat. No. 9,924,952, filed Jan. 11, 2016, Kulas et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,459, U.S. Pat. No. 10,507,028, filed Mar. 26, 2018, Kulas et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/886,260, 2018-0153562, filed Feb. 1, 2018, Kulas et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/966,778, 2018-0242986, filed Apr. 30, 2018, Kulas et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/390,476, 2019-0239898, filed Apr. 22, 2019, Vu et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/458,923, 2019-0321053, filed Jul. 1, 2019, Kulas et al.
Examination Report regarding Indian Patent Application No. 20183700762.8, dated Jul. 12, 2021.
Second Office Action regarding Chinese Patent Application No. 201680057692.0, dated Jan. 21, 2021.
Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2020 in corresponding/related European Application No. 16763164.7.
Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2020 in corresponding/related Japanese Application No. 2018-530653.
Office Action regarding Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-530653, dated May 13, 2021.
Examination Report regarding Australian Patent Application No. 2020244386, dated May 28, 2021.
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2019 in corresponding/related Chinese Application No. 201680031174.1.
Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2019 in corresponding/related Indian Application No. 2053/MUMNP/2014.
Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2019 in corresponding/related European Application No. 16763164.7.
Office Action regarding Brazilian Patent Application No. 112014025681.0, dated Jan. 21, 2020.
Office Action regarding Japanese Patent Application No. 2017550635, dated Jan. 29, 2020.
Stryker Neuro Spine ENT brochure, Zyphr Burs, Kalamazoo, Michigan, www.stryker.com, 2011, 6 pages.
Table of Contents, RedLine Tools catalog, www.redlinetools.com/Images/PDFs/Redline09/RL062009_Sec1_Front%20pl-9_72.pdf, pp. 1-8.
Examination Report dated Jun. 30, 2020 in corresponding/related Australian Application No. 2019204541.
Examination Report dated Jul. 15, 2020 in corresponding/related Australian Application No. 2016315693.
Examination Report dated May 26, 2020 in corresponding/related Australian Application No. 2019206060.
Office Action dated May 7, 2020 in corresponding/related Chinese Application No. 201680057692.0.
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 22, 2020 in corresponding/related European Application No. 20169211.8.
Canadian Office Action regarding Canadian Application No. 3,076,639, dated Apr. 13, 2021.
Office Action regarding Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-037614 (with English Translation), dated May 10, 2021.
Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2021, in corresponding/related European Application No. 16714680.2.
European Office Action regarding Patent Application No. 20169211.8, dated Mar. 9, 2022.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200113582 A1 Apr 2020 US
Divisions (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15935459 Mar 2018 US
Child 16716019 US
Parent 14992400 Jan 2016 US
Child 15935459 US
Parent 13447372 Apr 2012 US
Child 14992400 US