A variety of systems have been proposed for draining surgical wounds. The efficacy of such systems has been limited, however, especially for larger surgical spaces or those in which certain characteristics, such as motion or shape, or certain physiological characteristics, such as lymphatic drainage or low protein exist. Seroma is a frequent complication following surgery, and can occur when a large number of capillaries have been severed, allowing plasma to leak from the blood and lymphatic circulation. Surgical wounds that can lead to seroma formation include wounds resulting from surgery involving an abdominal flap, such as abdominoplasty surgery, breast reconstruction surgery, panniculectomy, and ventral hernia repair.
Available surgical drain devices suffer from several deficiencies, particularly when applied following abdominal flap surgery. They fail to drain fluid adequately, are prone to clogging, and fail to promote tissue adhesion within the wound. Thus, there remains a need to develop improved treatments for surgical wounds. The need is particularly acute in abdominal surgery, such as for the prevention and treatment of seromas, but also for any surgical wound predisposed to conditions of excess fluid drainage or tissue motion, or benefitting from tissue adhesion needs, such as pressure ulcers or wounds resulting from a tissue harvesting procedure.
The invention provides a surgical drain device for the prevention and treatment of seromas as well as for general use in promoting drainage of surgical wounds and wound closure. The drain device includes a plurality of drain tubes disposed on a substrate termed an “adhesion matrix,” which is designed to promote tissue adhesion within the seroma or wound space. The adhesion matrix has a conformable configuration and is made of a compliant material having planar surfaces that can curve to adapt to the shape of the wound space.
In a preferred embodiment, the adhesion matrix contains a plurality of apertures, or gaps in the matrix material, which allow tissue contact across the matrix, so as to promote adhesion and wound closure. Thus, a tissue surface on a first side of the matrix can directly contact a tissue surface on a second, or opposite, side of the matrix to promote rapid healing and stabilization of the wound. The number, size and distribution of the apertures extending through the matrix can be selected based on the geometry of the wound. For abdominal wounds, for example, the drain tubes can be positioned in a fan shaped array with a plurality of three or more tubes extending from a manifold. The matrix and/or the tubing can be cut or shaped by the user to conform to the shape of the wound. The matrix can also be used as a medication carrier to assist in the administration of a drug to a patient. The matrix can optionally include a layer of adhesive on at least a portion of any of its surfaces. The drain tubes can be removed from the device once drainage flow is sufficiently reduced, and the adhesion matrix can remain within the body, where it is degraded and absorbed over time, remaining in place to optimize tissue healing. The matrix can comprise a porous biodegradable polymer material. As the plurality of tubes extend from a single exit site into the wound with spaced apart distal ends, a user can readily remove all the tubes simultaneously from the wound.
The surgical drain device can include a tissue anchoring system, whereby the device is mechanically attached to surrounding tissues by an array of surface barbs or hooks. These surface structures can be located on any exposed surface of the adhesion matrix. When the device is implanted, the surrounding tissues can be pressed against the barbs or hooks to embed them within the tissue and anchor the device. The use of surface barbs or hooks can be used in combination with a surgical adhesive, providing a much stronger bond between tissue layers than the adhesive alone, and providing temporary adhesion while the adhesive sets. The structure of the hooks can have various forms depending on the tissue they are intended to bind. Longer hooks can be used for loosely bound tissues such as fat or connective tissue, while shorter hooks can be used for denser tissues such as muscle. Anchors with more rigid stems can be utilized to penetrate denser tissues.
Another aspect of the invention is a system for surgical wound drainage. The system includes the drain device described above together with a vacuum source, such as a pump, and a tube connecting the vacuum source to the drain tubes of the drain device. The system optionally also can include a fluid trap to collect drained fluid and a control unit to monitor and control the application of vacuum and the collection of fluid. Further components of the system can include a vacuum or pressure gauge, a flow meter, and a computer to monitor vacuum and flow and to regulate vacuum or flow.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for treating or preventing a seroma, or promoting the drainage or closure of a surgical wound. The method includes positioning the drain device described above into a seroma, or a surgical wound, such as a wound at risk of forming a seroma, and allowing the device to drain fluid from the wound for a period of time. The device can include surgical adhesive and/or barbs or hooks on its surface to create adhesion between tissue layers within the wound and to anchor the device in place. Drainage can be by gravity flow or can be vacuum assisted by attaching a vacuum source to the drain tubes of the device, using a manifold to merge the flow paths of the drain tubes to a common drain tube for collection. Negative pressure applied to the drain tubes can be used to hold the tissue layers above and below the device together until a surgical adhesive has set, or until the wound healing process binds the tissues together. The application of negative pressure further facilitates contact between tissue on opposite sides of the matrix through the apertures in the matrix to promote tissue adhesion. This improves the rate of healing while at the same time providing for drainage. Optionally, the drain tubes of the device can be removed from the body after drainage flow is reduced, thereby reducing the burden for resorption by the body. Removal of the drain tubes can be facilitated by the inclusion of drain tube channels, or drain tube release tabs, within the adhesion matrix. Release of the drain tubes is then accomplished by sliding the tubes out of the channels or appropriately maneuvering the drain tube assembly to break release tabs. The adhesion matrix is allowed to remain in the seroma or surgical wound where it is resorbed over time.
The flow rate from the drain tubes can be regulated by flow control elements. The flow rate can also be measured or the pressure of fluids can be measured by ultrasound devices or by other methods. The system can also be used in conjunction with wound dressings that can also be attached to a negative pressure source to remove fluids from the wound.
The present invention provides a surgical drain device, system, and method that allow fluid to be drained from surgical wounds and promote the healing of the wound. Preferred embodiments are used to prevent or treat seromas, for example. The drain device features a set of drain tubes that are attached to a substrate, herein referred to as an adhesion matrix, that is designed to promote adhesion of tissues within the wound or seroma and to encourage cellular infiltration into the device itself. The drain tubes are distributed across the adhesion matrix to promote even drainage across the device. To promote optimum drainage, the drain tubes can be uniformly distributed across the adhesion matrix. The drainage device can be left in place within the wound for a period of time, e.g., until fluid seepage diminishes, after which the drain tubes can be withdrawn from the device and removed from the patient without disturbing the adhesion matrix, which is left in place to biodegrade or become incorporated into the healing process. The device efficiently promotes the healing of even large area wounds such as those resulting from abdominal flap surgery.
A surgical drain device according to the invention is inserted through an incision in the skin of a patient and placed within a wound formed during surgery. A first purpose is to drain fluid during the surgical procedure. The system can be left in place and to provide drainage for days or even weeks following surgery. The device can be used for the treatment of a seroma, e.g., to drain a seroma and thereby promote its healing, it can also be used to prevent seroma formation. For example, the drain device can be placed routinely into surgical incision areas immediately following surgery and used to drain the area and aid in the prevention of seroma formation. Alternatively, the device can be placed into a seroma that has already formed by opening the seroma and installing the device. The use of the drain device is understood to “prevent” seroma formation even if it merely reduces the likelihood of seroma formation. Similarly, the use of the drain device is understood to “treat” seroma formation even if it merely increases the likelihood that the seroma will heal.
The device according to the invention includes a number of removable drain tubes 30 attached at their proximal ends to manifold 40, which connects to a vacuum source through vacuum tubing 50. The drain device collects and removes fluid from the abdominal region or from the fluid space of a seroma through the drain tubes, which divert the fluid outside the patient through the aid of a vacuum source. The number of drain tubes can vary depending upon the needs of the device, including the amount of fluid to be drained and the size of the wound and shape of the device. Typically, the device will contain from 2 to about 20 drain tubes. In a preferred embodiment, the device contains preferably at least 3 tubes, and for larger areas such as the abdomen, for example, from about 5 to about 12 tubes.
The drain tubes can be fabricated from any biocompatible thermoplastic or thermoset material. Examples include surgical grade silicone rubber, polyurethane, polyamide, polyimide, PEEK (polyether ether ketone), polycarbonate, PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate), and polyvinylchloride. The drain tubes are intended to be removed after fluid build-up has reduced to a level that is stable without drainage. However, in an alternative embodiment, the drain tubes can be made of a biodegradable material and can be left in place. The drain tubes can be flexible so as to conform to the tissues surrounding the device and to accommodate movement of the patient without causing discomfort. The drain tubes can be open ended or close ended. In a preferred embodiment, the drain tubes are close ended and possess apertures or holes along their length for the uptake of fluid.
Several alternative embodiments are also contemplated which lack drain tube channels.
In a preferred embodiment the drain tubes possess openings or apertures 33 along their length to permit fluid to enter for drainage.
Adhesion matrix 25 includes a plurality or matrix of apertures 27 which allow tissue contact through the drain device. Such tissue contact promotes wound healing and the sealing of capillaries, which is important for treating seromas or preventing their formation. In the drain device according to the present invention, the promotion of tissue contact works in combination with fluid drainage to promote wound healing. The adhesion matrix 25 and its drain tube channels 35 preferably are constructed of one or more biodegradable polymer materials and can be left within the wound, where they stabilize tissue infiltration and adhesion and thus promote the healing process. The size, shape, and distribution of the tissue contact apertures 27 can be varied according to individual needs. However, greater tissue contact across the device will promote better adhesion, drainage, and wound closure. Therefore, it is preferred that at least about 50%, 60%, or 70%, and preferably about 75-80% of the total surface area (one side) of the drain device remains open in the form of tissue contact apertures. The distribution and spacing of tissue contact apertures can be varied as desired, and the apertures can be the same, similar, or different in shape, size, and distribution across the device. For example, the apertures can be distributed with an average center-to-center spacing in the range of about 2 mm to about 20 mm or more, and the average individual aperture surface area can be in the range from about 1 mm2 to about 5 cm2. In a preferred embodiment, the apertures have about 1 cm2 average surface area, and their number or their collective surface area become progressively larger from the proximal end of the drain device (i.e., near the exit point from the body) toward the distal end of the device (deep within the wound or seroma), so that tissue adhesion and wound closure progress from deep within the wound towards the surface of the body.
The adhesion matrix, including any drain tube channels and hooks or barbs, can be fabricated from a biodegradable polymer material, as these structures are intended to remain in place in the patient's body after removal of the drain tubes, so as not to disrupt the healing process. Examples of suitable biodegradable or resorbable materials include Vicryl (polyglycolic acid), Monocryl (glycolic acid-s-caprolactone copolymer), PDS (polydioxanone, PDO), PLA (polylactic acid, polylactide), PLLA (poly-L-lactic acid), PDLA (poly-D-lactic acid), PGA (polyglycolic acid, polyglycolide), PLGA (poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)), PHB (polyhydroxybutyrate), and PCL (polycaprolactone). In a preferred embodiment, the adhesion matrix, including any drain tube channels, is formed of an open network of polymer chains that has sufficient porosity to allow infiltration by cells and fluid flow across the material. Cellular infiltration can promote tissue adhesion and the biodegradation of the polymer after the wound has healed. In some embodiments, the adhesion matrix including any drain tube channels is permeable to seroma fluid but not permeable to cells. In other embodiments, the adhesion matrix, including any drain tube channels, is permeable to fluid and electrolytes but is impermeable to proteins. The permeability properties of the matrix polymer material that makes up the basic substrate of the matrix can be the same or different compared to the material that makes up the drain tube channels. In a preferred embodiment, the polymer chains, or fibers composed of polymer chains, of the adhesion matrix are aligned along an axis substantially perpendicular to the axes of the nearest drain tubes. This alignment pattern promotes the flow of fluid through or along the surface of the adhesion matrix towards the drain tubes.
The adhesion matrix, and thus the overall drain device, can have any form suitable for insertion into the wound or seroma where it is to be inserted. Generally, the form is that of a thin sheet having an essentially rectangular shape. However, the shape can be rounded, circular, elliptical, oval, or irregular. Preferably the corners are rounded so as to minimize mechanical irritation of surrounding tissues. The size of the device is also determined by the particular use and anatomy of the patient. For example, the adhesion matrix can have an overall width and length in the range from about 2 cm to 25 cm, such as about 10 cm×12 cm or about 20 cm×25 cm. The thickness of the adhesion matrix can be from about 0.5 mm to about 1 cm; where the sheet of material is preferably less than 5 mm in thickness and preferably the adhesion matrix is about 1-2 mm thick. The thickness of the entire drain device, including the sheet of the adhesion matrix, drain tubes, and any hooks or glue pads is about 5 mm or less, 10 mm or less, or about 5-10 mm.
The adhesion matrix can be coated with an adhesive material such as a surgical glue either in addition to or instead of using hook or barb structures that stabilize tissue layers on either side of the drain device. Any type of surgical adhesive suitable for use within the body can be used, including polyethylene glycol polymers, adhesive proteins, gelatin-thrombin mixtures, albumin-glutaraldehyde, and fibrin-based sealants. Cyanoacrylates are to be avoided, as they cause inflammation if used internally. An adhesive coating can be placed on one or both surfaces of the adhesion matrix. Adhesive coatings can be applied to the device prior to its placement in a patient, i.e., as part of the device fabrication process. An adhesive coating can cover all or a portion of a surface of the device. A surgical adhesive can be used in the form of a fibrous mat or pad that is soaked with an adhesive composition. The mat or pad is preferably fabricated from a biodegradable polymer, such as the type used to prepare the adhesion matrix. One or more layers of adhesive material can be placed between the device and surrounding tissue at the time of placement in the patient.
The invention also provides a method for treating or preventing a seroma as illustrated in
Illustrated in connection with
Negative pressure can be applied to the wound dressing 402 through separate tube 415 that can be attached to the same pump 420 as the drainage system or a second pump. A valve 406 can be used to regulate pressure to the wound dressing. In the embodiment of
Shown in
Shown in
Shown in
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and/or details therein and equivalents thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth by the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/111,977, filed Oct. 15, 2013, which was a 35 U.S.C. § 371 national stage filing of International Application No. PCT/US2012/033608, filed Apr. 13, 2012, which claims the priority to U.S. Application No. 61/475,945, filed Apr. 15, 2011. The entire contents of the above applications being incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4257422 | Duncan | Mar 1981 | A |
4429693 | Blake et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4579555 | Russo | Apr 1986 | A |
4608041 | Nielsen | Aug 1986 | A |
4781678 | de Couet et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5116310 | Seder et al. | May 1992 | A |
5415715 | Delage et al. | May 1995 | A |
5549579 | Batdorf et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5628735 | Skow | May 1997 | A |
5636643 | Argenta et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
6099513 | Spehalski | Aug 2000 | A |
6478789 | Spehalski et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6641575 | Lonky | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6685681 | Lockwood et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6770794 | Fleischmann | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6814079 | Heaton et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7125402 | Yarger | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7182758 | McCraw | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7216651 | Argenta et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7322971 | Shehada | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7351250 | Zamierowski | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381211 | Zamierowski | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7381859 | Hunt et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402620 | McGhee | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410495 | Zamierowski | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413570 | Zamierowski | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413571 | Zamierowski | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7438705 | Karpowicz et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7625362 | Boehringer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7658749 | Wittmann | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7699831 | Bengtson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7753894 | Blott et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7754937 | Boehringer et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7779625 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7790945 | Watson, Jr. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7815616 | Boehringer et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7857806 | Karpowicz et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7896856 | Petrosenko et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7981098 | Boehringer et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8030534 | Radl et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8062331 | Zamierowski | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070773 | Zamierowski | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8079991 | Watson | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8114126 | Heaton et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123781 | Zamierowski | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8142419 | Heaton et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8172816 | Kazala, Jr. et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8187237 | Seegert | May 2012 | B2 |
8188331 | Barta et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8197467 | Heaton et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8273105 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8303881 | Lauria | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8353931 | Stopek et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8399730 | Kazala, Jr. et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8447375 | Shuler | May 2013 | B2 |
8715267 | Bengtson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8777911 | Heagle et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20010029956 | Argenta et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044637 | Jacobs et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020077661 | Saadat | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082567 | Lockwood | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020150720 | Howard et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161346 | Lockwood et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030109855 | Solem et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050065484 | Watson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107756 | McCraw | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137539 | Biggie | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050209574 | Boehringer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240220 | Zamierowski | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060041247 | Petrosenko et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060079852 | Bubb | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070021760 | Kelleher | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021779 | Garvin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027414 | Hoffman et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032763 | Vogel | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070249999 | Sklar et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070276316 | Haffner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070299541 | Chernomorsky et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080033324 | Cornet et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080033401 | Watson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051832 | To et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080064953 | Falco et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082130 | Ward | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097601 | Codori-Hurff et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114277 | Ambrosio et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161837 | Toso et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167593 | Fleischmann | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080200950 | Wohlert | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080300625 | Zamierowski | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005744 | Karpowicz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012482 | Pinto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090069904 | Picha | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105670 | Bentley et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090137973 | Karpowicz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090254120 | Argenta | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090306609 | Blott | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312723 | Blott | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022990 | Karpowicz et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100029717 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069886 | Wilkes | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100022 | Greener et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100160719 | Kassab et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160874 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160877 | Kagan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179515 | Swain et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179516 | Bengtson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100234716 | Engel | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274177 | Rybski et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292717 | Petter-Puchner et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324516 | Braga | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004168 | Eriksson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028898 | Clark, III et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054365 | Greener | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071484 | Song | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077605 | Karpowicz et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110130730 | Hartwell et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110178451 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110224628 | Bodenlenz | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224631 | Simmons et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110282309 | Adze et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282310 | Boehringer et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301556 | Lichtenstein | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120025348 | Marechal et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041403 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059412 | Fleischmann | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071841 | Bengtson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120116334 | Albert et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116384 | Truckai | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143113 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150133 | Heaton et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165725 | Chomas et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165937 | Montanari et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172926 | Hotter | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120174380 | Kennedy et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191054 | Kazala, Jr. et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197415 | Montanari et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209226 | Simmons et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232502 | Lowing | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120277773 | Sargeant et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130131564 | Locke et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130203012 | Walker | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130274717 | Dunn | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281784 | Ray | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140039468 | Dunn | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1320342 | Jun 2003 | EP |
2094211 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2471462 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2594299 | May 2013 | EP |
2006087021 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO-2006119256 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007143179 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008104609 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2010075180 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2010097570 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2011091169 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO-2011137230 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2012001371 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO-2012021553 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO-2012068052 | May 2012 | WO |
WO-2012082716 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO-2012136707 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO-2013074829 | May 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Supplementary Partial European Search Report by the European Patent Office for European Application No. EP 12772030.8 dated Jun. 1, 2015. |
ProGrip™ Mesh: Self-Gripping Mesh for Hernia Repair, McMahon Publishing, Mar. 2012. |
Kontakis, George M., et al., “Bioabsorbable Materials in Orthopaedics”, Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, vol. 73, Feb. 2007, pp. 159-169. |
International Search Report, PCT/US12/33608, dated Apr. 13, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US13/69916 dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability by the International Bureau of WIPO for international application No. PCT/US13/69916 dated May 19, 2015. |
Grabow, Niles, et al., “A Biodegradable Slotted Tube Stent Based on Poly(L-lactide) and Poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) for Rapid Balloon-Expansion”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 35, No. 12, Dec. 2007, pp. 2031-2038. |
Extended European Search Report by European Patent Office for European Application No. EP 12772030.8 dated Sep. 22, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170189239 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61475945 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14111977 | US | |
Child | 15337632 | US |