1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates broadly to surgical devices. In particular, this invention relates to a surgical clip applier which is adapted for use through an endoscope and may be used to clamp and/or suture, ducts, vessels, and other tissues, to anchor a tissue, or to attach a foreign body to a tissue.
2. State of the Art
Surgical clips are generally used to apply clamping force to ducts, vessels, and other tissues. In addition, surgical clips are particularly useful in controlling bleeding of a tissue in lieu of suturing or stapling where suturing or stapling is difficult.
All of the currently available surgical multifiring clip appliers are substantially rigid devices intended to extend through a trocar port or through an incision to a surgical site requiring application of a clip. The devices have been rigid because a stiff pushing element has been required in order to exert the required pushing force to move the clip over the tissue.
However, there is a substantial need for a flexible clip applier, particularly one insertable through a lumen of an endoscope. The ability to apply clips through an endoscope would permit myriad minimally invasive surgical solutions to medical problems, especially those of the gastrointestinal tract. However, it is accepted theory that the transmitted force required to advance or form a clip over tissue cannot be produced in the distalmost end of a long flexible device that is commonly constructed with a metal tubular coil, or polymer tube, such as an endoscopic device or catheter. For example, C. Paul Swain, MD, a recognized expert in endoscopic instruments and particularly endoscopic stapling devices, has stated that “[i]t is hard to exert more than 200 g of force on the tissue when pushing . . . This fact is of course one feature that makes intervention at flexible endoscopy relatively safe”. See C. Paul Swain, “What Endoscopic Accessories Do We Really Need?”, Emerging Technologies in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Gastrointest. Endosc., Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 313-330 (April 1997). Yet, a pushing force substantially greater than 200 g is required to push a clip over compressed tissue. In fact, it is believed a force in excess of 500 grams (1.1 lbs) is required for a satisfactory instrument, and substantially greater forces, e.g., in excess of 1500 grams (3.3 lbs) would be desirable.
Generally a flexible endoscopic device (e.g., a biopsy forceps device) includes an outer tubular member, typically being constructed of a metal tubular coil or a polymer tube which is poor in transmitting forces that impart tensile stresses to the outer sheath, a control element longitudinally movable relative to the tubular member, an end effector coupled to the distal ends of both the tubular member and the control element such that relative movement of the control element and the tubular member causes operation of the end effector, and a handle which moves the control element relative to the handle. This type of flexible endoscopic instrument is limited in the amount of pushing force it can generate for several reasons. Compression of a flexible control element (pushing element) tends to cause the pushing element to buckle within the outer flexible sheath of the device. If a relatively larger diameter flexible pushing element is used such that it better resists buckling, the pushing element may impart too much stiffness to the flexing of the endoscopic instrument. In addition, a flexible pushing element of larger diameter is subject to greater frictional forces within the outer sheath which reduces the force transmitted from the handle to the end effector. If the flexible pushing element is made relatively smaller in diameter, it is subject to kinking which will result in little to no force transmitted to the distal end. Kinking is especially a problem in endoscopic instruments, as the endoscope and its lumen may be extended through a tortuous path. For these reasons and others, mechanical application of a relatively large distal end pushing force and particularly clip application have been absent from the capability of flexible endoscopic tools.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a flexible endoscopic device capable of generating a relatively large pushing force at its distal end.
It is another object of the invention to provide an endoscopic clip applier.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a flexible clip applier which can exert a pushing force of at least 500 grams (1.1 lbs), and preferably in excess of 1500 grams (3.3 lbs) via a manually actuatable handle.
It is an additional object of the invention to provide a surgical clip applier which is adapted for use in minimally invasive surgery.
It is also an object of the invention to provide a surgical clip applier which has a pushing element which is not subject to kinking.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide a surgical clip applier which has a pushing element which does not create unsuitably high frictional forces within the outer sheath.
It is still a further object of the invention to provide a surgical clip applier which can store and apply multiple clips.
In accord with these objects, which will be discussed in detail below, a surgical clip applier is provided having a flexible, preferably flat wire wound outer tubular coil, a pair of jaws at the distal end of the tubular coil, a set of end effector wires extending through the outer tubular coil and coupled to the jaws, and a clip-advancing wire extending through the tubular coil. A lubricious, preferably extruded polymer, multilumen barrier sheath extends within the tubular coil and separates the wires from each other and the tubular coil. A clip chamber is provided in the distal end of the tubular coil and stores a plurality of linearly arranged clips. A clip pusher is provided at a distal end of the clip-advancing wire, and adapted to advance the clips in the chamber toward the jaws when the clip-advancing wire is advanced through the barrier sheath and outer tubular coil. The jaws include clamping surfaces which operate to compress tissue between the jaws when the jaws are closed, guides in which a distalmost clip rides distally and is advanced over the clamped tissue when the line of clips is advanced by the clip pusher, and a distal anvil which operates to bend a portion of the distalmost clip to enhance its retention on the clamped tissue. A proximal handle is provided for movement of the clip-advancing wire and end effector wires relative to the barrier sheath to effect (1) clamping and rotation of the jaws (relative to each other and about the longitudinal axis of the tubular coil), and (2) advancement of the clip-advancing wire to effect distal movement of a clip.
The flat wire wound tubular coil is preferred over round wire (though not necessarily required over a round wire wound tubular coil) because it is flexible, yet sufficiently longitudinally stiff such that the device may be pushed through the lumen of the endoscope. In addition, the flat wire wound tubular coil can be made with a high preload and has a tensile spring constant sufficiently high that it resists buckling and uncoiling during application of a pushing force by the handle against the clip-advancing wire. The clip-advancing wire has a sufficiently large diameter to transmit force, yet small enough to minimize internal friction when moved within a device flexed through a tortuous path in an endoscope. The end effector wires are large enough to handle the high closing force from the handle, and to resist compressive buckling when moved in an opposite direction, yet small enough to be coupled to diminutive jaws. The multilumen barrier sheath supports the clip-advancing wire and end effector wires along their length to reduce compressive buckling, and provides a separation layer to reduce friction. Movement of the clip-advancing wire relative to the outer tubular coil causes a compressive force in the clip-advancing wire and tensile forces in the outer tubular member such that a relative pushing force is transmitted to the distal end of the clip-advancing wire in excess of the perceived threshold of the 200 grams (0.44 lbs). In fact, one embodiment of the device of the invention, sized for endoscopic use, provides a pushing force in excess of 2267 grams (5 lbs).
In operation, the jaws can be moved through a working channel of an endoscope in a closed position. Once exited, the handle can be operated to open the jaws and rotate the jaws to a desired orientation. The jaws are positioned on either side of tissue about which it is desired to place a clip and the handle is operated to pull the end effector wires such that the jaws clamp about the tissue. The handle is then locked to maintain the jaws in the clamped position. The handle is operated to effect advancement of the clip-advancing wire through the tubular coil such that a clip is advanced through the jaw guides and over the tissue. The clip is advanced until a portion thereof is forced against the anvil of the jaws to effect bending of the clip portion such that that portion moves laterally to pierce the clamped tissue. After the clip is applied, the jaws are released from about the tissue, and the end effector assembly may then be moved to another tissue location to apply additional clips.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reference to the detailed description taken in conjunction with the provided figures.
Turning now to
Referring to
A tube 60 extends from the interior of the handle 40 to the exterior and includes a proximal rotation knob 62. The proximal end of the clip-advancing wire 30 is clamped, or otherwise held, within the tube 60 such that rotation of the knob 62 causes rotation of the entire clip-advancing wire. A distal end 64 of the tube 60 is rotatably coupled within a collar 66. The collar 66 is fixedly coupled to a rack 68. Linear movement of the rack 68 within the housing causes the tube to move longitudinally within and outside the housing.
Alternatively, referring to
Referring back to
The teeth of the pinion 70 are preferably at a positive engagement angle relative to the teeth of the rack 68 because of the location of the pinion pivot axis 72. Then, when the pinion is rotated, the rack is moved longitudinally. A leaf spring 76 acts between the pinion 70, at hole 78, and the advancing lever 52 at shelf 77 to force the pinion 70 into the rack 68. After firing a clip, as discussed below, release of the clip-advancing lever 52 allows the spring 58 to return the lever 52 back to its unbiased position, and the pinion 70 rotates about the pinion axis 72 against the leaf spring 76 and over the rack 68.
Turning now to
Once the jaws are closed about tissue, as discussed further below, it is desired to maintain their closed position until a clip is advanced over the tissue. In view of this object, the catch system 80 function as follows. Still referring to
Turning now to
Turning again to
Referring back to
The barrier sheath 36 within the tubular coil is preferably non-circular in shape to reduce contact points and thereby minimize friction between the barrier sheath and the tubular coil. The primary purpose of the sheath is to maintain a close fitting bearing surface for the clip-advancing wire, although its three distinct lumina help reduce friction between all the wires. The sheath 36 preferably free floats within the tubular coil; i.e., it is not attached to the tubular coil at its ends or along its length. Preferred cross-sectional shapes include generally rectangular and triangular (each with or without broken or rounded edges) and trefoil. The barrier sheath 36 is preferably an extrusion made from polypropylene, an FEP fluoropolymer resin (FEP), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), high density polyethylene (HDPE), nitrol polyvinyl chloride, nylon, or any other lubricious polymer.
The clip-advancing wire 30 is preferably made of nickel-titanium alloy (NiTi) or stainless steel. The NiTi construction permits the clip-advancing wire 30 to transmit torque (by rotation of the rotation knob 62) without taking a cast, and with minimal whipping. The clip-advancing wire 30 has a sufficiently large diameter to transmit force, yet not so large that it is prevented from functioning through a tortuous path or fit within the tubular coil 12. A preferred diameter for the clip-advancing wire is approximately 0.375 mm to 0.89 mm (0.015 inch to 0.035 inch).
Referring to
Referring to
Moreover, rotation of the clip-advancing wire 30 causes a rotational moment to be applied to the connector 152 and consequently the distal end of the tubular coil 12. The distal end of the preloaded tubular coil 12 can be thereby rotated 360° in each of the clockwise and counterclockwise directions by rotation of the rotation knob 62 attached to the proximal end of the clip-advancing wire 30. Because the end effector assembly 13 is attached to the distal end of the tubular coil, rotation of knob 62 effects rotation of the end effector assembly 13 and the jaws 18, 20.
The end effector wires 22, 24 are large enough in diameter to preferably handle up to fifteen pounds of closing force from the handle assembly and also to handle the force required to open the jaws 18, 20 without buckling. However, the end effector wires must be small enough in diameter to attach to the jaws, and fit in the tubular coil 12. A preferred diameter for the end effector wires is approximately 0.178 mm to 0.375 mm (0.007 inch to 0.015 inch), though other sizes may be used.
Referring to
Referring to
The clip pusher 34, preferably made of stainless steel, is coupled to the distal end 32 of the clip-advancing wire 30, e.g., by mechanical joining or welding. The clip pusher 34, as described in more detail below, is provided with a shape substantially similar to the distal portion of a clip 202 (
Referring to
Referring to
Turning now to
Once the jaws are fully clamped about the tissue, the locking tooth 90 engages with the lever lock 110 as the latch 94 moves down to allow engagement and thereby lock the jaw closing lever 48 relative to the stationary handle 46, as discussed above with respect to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring to
It is noted that after clip 202a is released, the retainer 214b of clip 202b partially extends into the space between the jaws 18, 20. If not retracted, this retainer 214b would obstruct positioning the jaws 18, 20 about the tissue and subsequent clip application during the procedure. However, when the clip-advancing lever 52 is released, torsion spring 58 (
The device may then be used to apply another clip, or the jaws may be closed and the device may be withdrawn through the endoscope.
The resulting clip applier is capable of transmitting a pushing force at the distal end of the clip-advancing wire, resulting from the compressive force appliable to the clip-advancing wire and the relative tensile force appliable to the outer tubular coil and end effector wires, far in excess of the perceived threshold of the 200 grams (0.44 lbs) in the prior art. In fact, as discussed below, one embodiment of the device of the invention provides a pushing force in excess of 2267 grams (5 lbs).
More particularly, referring to
In a first prototype, indicated by ‘RUN #1’, ‘RUN #2’ and ‘RUN #3’, the tubular coil 12 has an outer diameter of 0.09 inch and an inner diameter of 0.06 inch. The clip-advancing wire 30 has an outer diameter of 0.017 inch and the end effector wires 22, 24 each have an outer diameter of 0.011 inch. The proximal end of the end effector wires 22, 24 are pulled with 11 lbs of force which generally results in 5 to 10 lbs of force at the distal end of the end effector wires, depending on the degree to which the tubular coil 12 is bent (modeled by looping the tubular coil through two inch loops); i.e., frictional losses reduce the transmitted force. Moreover, it is noted that whatever force is transmitted to the distal end of the end effector wires 22, 24, only approximately one-fifth of that force is applied to the jaws, as the distance from the jaw tang 168 to the pivot 166 is relatively shorter than the length of the end of the jaw (anvil 184) to the pivot 166, approximately in a one to five ratio. As such, an input force of 11 lbs may results in one to two lbs of force on the jaws 18, 20. Applying the pulling force simulates the in-use condition in which the pushing force is transmitted.
With the tubular coil 12 extending relatively straight (i.e., through no loops) in ‘RUN #1’, an input pushing force of 8 lbs on the proximal end of the clip-advancing wire 30 (i.e., a pushing force of 8 lbs on the rack 68) resulted in an output pushing force of 3.82 lbs (1732.7 grams) at the clip pusher 34 at the distal end 32 of the clip-advancing wire 30. With the tubular coil 12 extending through one two-inch loop in ‘RUN #2’, an input pushing force of 8 lbs resulted in an output pushing force of 3.42 lbs (1551.3 grams). With the tubular coil 12 extending through two two-inch loops, in ‘RUN #3’, an input pushing force of 7 lbs resulted in an output pushing force of 3.37 lbs (1528.6 grams).
In a second prototype, indicated by ‘RUN #4’, the diameters of the tubular coil 12 and end effector wires 22, 24 are the same as Example 1. However, the diameter of the clip-advancing wire 30 is decreased to 0.015 inch. With the tubular coil 12 extending through no loops, a six pound input pushing force resulted in an output pushing force of 2.11 lbs (957 grams).
In a third prototype, indicated by ‘RUN #5’, ‘RUN #6’ and ‘RUN #7’, the diameters of the tubular coil 12 and end effector wires 22, 24 are the same as Example 1. However, the diameter of the clip-advancing wire 30 is increased to 0.02 inch. With the tubular coil 12 extending through no loops in ‘RUN #5’, an input pushing force of 8 lbs resulted in an output pushing force of 4.03 lbs (1828 grams). With the tubular coil 12 extending through one two-inch loop in ‘RUN #6’, an input pushing force of 8 lbs resulted in an output pushing force of 4.08 lbs (1851 grams). With the tubular coil extending through two two-inch loops, in ‘RUN #7’, an input pushing force of 8 lbs resulted in an output pushing force of 3.54 lbs (1605.7 grams).
In a fourth prototype, indicated by ‘RUN #8’ and ‘RUN #9’, the device includes a tubular coil 12 having an outer diameter of 0.086 inch and an inner diameter of 0.053 inch, a clip-advancing wire 30 having a diameter of 0.017 inch, and end effector wires 22, 24 having diameters of 0.009 inch. With the tubular coil extending through no loops, an input pushing force of 8 lbs resulted in 4.61 lbs (2091 grams) of output pushing force. With the tubular coil extending through two two-inch loops, an input pushing force of 8 lbs resulted in 4.28 lbs (1941.3 grams) of output pushing force.
In a fifth prototype, indicated by ‘RUN #10’, the clip-advancing wire 30 and end effector wires 22, 24 of the device 10 have the same diameters as Example 4. The tubular coil 12 has an outer diameter of 0.086 inch and an inner diameter of 0.054 inch. With the tubular coil 12 extending through no loops, an input pushing force of 8 lbs resulted in 4.42 lbs (2004.9 grams) of output pushing force.
In a sixth prototype, indicated by ‘RUN #11’, the clip-advancing wire 30 and end effector wires 22, 24 of the device 10 have the same diameters as Example 4. The tubular coil 12 has an outer diameter of 0.083 inch and an inner diameter of 0.054 inch. With the tubular coil 12 extending through no loops, an input pushing force of 8 lbs resulted in 5.17 lbs (2345 grams) of output pushing force.
Other flexible clip appliers suitable for use through a relatively smaller 2.6 mm diameter endoscope have also been constructed and tested. For example, one clip applier has a tubular coil 12 with an outer diameter of 0.092 inch, and an inner diameter of 0.060 inch, a clip-advancing wire 30 with a diameter of 0.022 inch, and end effector wires 22, 24 each with a diameter of 0.013 inch. The device can apply a pushing force of between 3 lbs (1361 grams) and 5 lbs (2268 grams) depending on the number of two-inch loops through which the tubular coil was wound.
It is therefore appreciated that other dimensions may be used for devices intended for use in endoscopes having working channels of other sizes. Moreover, the device may be used outside an endoscope, where it is not limited by the size of the working channel.
From the foregoing examples, it will be appreciated that a flexible surgical clip applier, suitable for use through an endoscope is hereby provided. The device is capable of effecting a pushing force far in excess of the previously considered limitation of approximately 200 grams for a mechanical system sized to be used through an endoscope. See C. Paul Swain, “What Endoscopic Accessories Do We Really Need?”, Emerging Technologies in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Gastrointest. Endosc., Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 313-330 (April 1997), discussed above. This substantial force permits clips to be forced over tissue and thereby makes available clip clamping, closure, and ‘suturing’ in an endoscopic procedure.
There have been described and illustrated herein embodiments of a flexible surgical clip applier. While particular embodiments of the invention have been described, it is not intended that the invention be limited thereto, as it is intended that the invention be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Thus, while particular materials have been disclosed, it will be appreciated that other materials can be used as well. In addition, while particular dimensions have been disclosed, it will be understood that other suitable dimensions can be used as well. Also, while the device has particularly been described for use in endoscopic procedures, where a great need exists for such a device, it will be appreciated that flexible, non-endoscopic devices are considered within the scope of the invention. For example, the tubular coil may have a substantially shorter length and the device may be used through body orifices such as the ear canal, the nasal passages, and through the larynx and trachea. By way of another example, elements of the device may have substantially larger dimensions and the device can be used through a trocar port. Furthermore, while both jaws are shown rotatable about a clevis, it will be appreciated that only one jaw need be rotatable relative to the other. Also, while two clip guides, one on each jaw, are shown, it is recognized that only a single clip guide on one of the jaws is required. Moreover, while the device of the invention is described as having two end effector wires, it will be appreciated that a single control wire may be used which is coupled to at least one of the jaws, and the other jaw may be stationary or mechanically linked to also close and open upon actuation of the single end effector wire. Also, while the device has been described with respect to a clip-advancing wire and end effector wires, it will be appreciated that reference to the ‘wires’ is intended to also include non-metal filaments, multifilamentary constructs, such as cables, and coils. In addition, while the end effector wires when subject to a tensile force create a compressive force on the tubular coil which effectively increases its tensile capability to facilitate pushing a clip over clamped tissue without exceeding the tensile limitation of the coil, it is recognized that other mechanisms may be used to increase the tensile limitation of the coil. For example, a preferably flat and preferably wire ribbon may be coupled to the inside the coil to limit the amount by which the coil can be stretched. Furthermore, while the ability to provide a relative high pushing force at the distal end of a clip-advancing wire is disclosed with respect to a clip applier, it is recognized that such capability has application to instruments other than clip appliers; for example, for endoscopic staplers, lithotriptors, or any other instrument where it is desired to hold tissue and apply a pushing force, such as a device for tagging. It will therefore be appreciated by those skilled in the art that yet other modifications could be made to the provided invention without deviating from its spirit and scope as claimed.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/010,903 filed Dec. 6, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,843,794 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 09/891,775 filed Jun. 25, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,716,226 which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
268632 | Danforth | Dec 1882 | A |
1756670 | Treat | Apr 1930 | A |
2246495 | Alessi et al. | Jun 1941 | A |
3851359 | Wilson | Dec 1974 | A |
4038987 | Komiya | Aug 1977 | A |
4044429 | Wagner | Aug 1977 | A |
4346869 | MacNeill | Aug 1982 | A |
4390019 | LeVeen et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4418694 | Beroff et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4430997 | DiGiovanni et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4444187 | Perlin | Apr 1984 | A |
4476865 | Failla et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4572181 | Mattler | Feb 1986 | A |
4741336 | Failla et al. | May 1988 | A |
4835824 | Durham et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4988355 | Leveen et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5022126 | Davis | Jun 1991 | A |
5030226 | Green et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5099827 | Melzer et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5159730 | Radvin | Nov 1992 | A |
5163945 | Ortiz et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5171249 | Stefanchik et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5222961 | Nakao et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5269804 | Bales et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5312426 | Segawa et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312434 | Crainich | May 1994 | A |
5354312 | Brinkerhoff et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361463 | Revis | Nov 1994 | A |
5389104 | Hahnen et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5395369 | McBrayer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403326 | Harrison et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5425737 | Burbank et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5433721 | Hooven et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439468 | Schulze et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5439479 | Shichman et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5474570 | Kockerling et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482054 | Slater et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5522823 | Kuntz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5571116 | Bolanos et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575802 | McQuilkin et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5601573 | Fogelberg et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5657519 | Smith | Aug 1997 | A |
5667517 | Hooven | Sep 1997 | A |
5681330 | Hughett et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5707392 | Kortenbach | Jan 1998 | A |
5716374 | Francese et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5741283 | Fahy | Apr 1998 | A |
5766189 | Matsuno | Jun 1998 | A |
5769857 | Reztzov et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775345 | Chou | Jul 1998 | A |
5800449 | Wales | Sep 1998 | A |
5814054 | Kortenbach et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5871488 | Tovey et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5891156 | Gessner et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897507 | Kortenbach et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897562 | Bolanos et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906630 | Anderhub et al. | May 1999 | A |
5937488 | Geiger | Aug 1999 | A |
5941439 | Kammerer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5993465 | Shipp et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993476 | Groiso | Nov 1999 | A |
6001110 | Adams | Dec 1999 | A |
6013095 | Ouchi | Jan 2000 | A |
6099537 | Sugai et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6129683 | Sutton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139555 | Hart et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159223 | Danks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162233 | Williamson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6238414 | Griffiths | May 2001 | B1 |
6269819 | Oz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6387041 | Harai et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6425900 | Knodel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6560488 | Crawford | May 2003 | B1 |
6569085 | Kortenbach et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6578759 | Ortiz | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6843794 | Sixto et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6945979 | Kortenbach et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7070602 | Smith et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7090685 | Kortenbach et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20010056282 | Sonnenschein et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020068935 | Kortenbach et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082621 | Schurr et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104199 | Chen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020198537 | Sixto, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198549 | Sixto, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014065 | Osterline | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0748614 | Dec 1996 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050090838 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10010903 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 10992569 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09891775 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 10010903 | US |