This invention is in the technical field of medical equipment, in particular for surgical drape systems utilized in urology procedures on male patients. Such procedures are relatively common but still have demonstrated less than desired outcome in many cases. Problems may arise with infections and patient discomfort that require prolonged patient care and procedure re-work in best cases, but can in worse cases introduce serious long term consequences both for patients and care givers. This occurs currently despite more stringent medical guidelines being in place. There is a very active demand today by the entire society to reduce health care cost, and medical procedure infections and other procedure complications is one important factor.
As part of preparation for urology procedures like catheterization, the patient is scrubbed with antibacterial agents in the entire pubic area. This process has the drawback that this particular area is typically covered with body hair and has several skin folds, resulting in risk for incomplete bacteria elimination. Furthermore, loose hair and skin particles from this area may easily become dislodged during the urology procedure and can contaminate instruments or the urethral meatus and nearby areas. This may call for using extra potent antibacterial agents. However, increasing the amount, or potency, of antibacterial agents can lead to the long term drawback of breeding more resistant bacteria strains.
In the male urology procedure, the patient is typically cleaned and prepared, and then covered at least partially with a sterile surgical drape. The drape may use multiple sections or have one or more fenestrations included to access to the male organ. It is common that sizeable amounts of liquids emerge from the urethra or instruments during the procedure. Such liquids may however flow down through fenestration apertures and reach other parts of the patient body and the operating table, causing inconvenience and a less clean environment. Medical spent liquids disposal also needs special procedures and equipment to avoid spills or undesired contact.
At urethral catherization or endoscopy, proper insertion and control of the instrument is critical to avoid tissue damage or patient discomfort. This is complicated by the need to use one of the hands to fully support the penis which is typically flaccid. One of the operator's hands may be in use to support the penis during most of the procedure of current art, making it inconvenient to perform other duties during the process.
Sometimes it is necessary to let catheters or other connected instruments remain in the patient for an extended time after the procedure. This requires a drape design that can be easily removed with instruments in place. Condom-like male drape features would not be practical for this.
The prior art known to the present inventors can be divided into two main categories of male urological surgical drapes. First, there are the flat drapes containing one or more fenestrations for accessing the penis, and second, there are the condom or sheath-containing male surgical drapes.
The above-referenced drawbacks have been attempted to be solved to varying degree by prior art, but there is our knowledge not any solutions disclosed that solves of all these issues with one surgical drape system and minimum drawbacks.
The present invention is a drape system for reduced risk and simplified urological procedures for male patients. The drape system isolates the pelvic area as a non-sterile environment below the drape and a sterile area above the drape, with a sealed fenestration between these areas preventing contamination from below to reach the top side and urology fluids to reach the bottom side. The exposed patient area on the top sterile side is limited to only the urethral meatus with small surroundings of the glans tip, and provides a seal from the non sterile areas below. This simplifies antibacterial preparation of the patient ahead of the urological procedure and reduces infection risk by isolating the urology procedure entry location from the general pubic area.
The drape may have a simple, generally flat shape made of flexible translucent plastics or a thin elastic sheet material. It is draped around the penis in an initially tent-like fashion and held in place by means of a surrounding penile drape clamp. A removable drape cover will upon removal expose only a small area around the meatus for antibacterial preparation and accessible for urology procedures.
This penile protruded shape draping starting from a flat shape creates longitudinal drape wrinkles that can actually improve the drape functionality. An unexpected observation is that the longitudinally rippled shape of the drape may act as an external penile stiffening structure connected to the surrounding drape for stabilized penile positioning even in a flaccid state. This reduces the need for the operator to manually hold the penis in position and therefore occupying one hand during most of the urological procedure.
Because this drape design creates a sealed area above the patient except the meatus area, control and collection of urology liquids is simplified. For instance, a disposable and safe to handle absorbing or liquid gelling pad may be placed on portions of drape top side.
Removal of the drape after the urology procedure with instruments like catheters still in place can be achieved by a splittable line in the drape all the way in from an external drape edge and in to the fenestration. This is simple to achieve due to the generally flat sheet design of the drape, compared to the difficult to split molded drape protrusions in some prior art.
As a summary, this male patient urology drape system can offer major advantages in safety, functionality, simplicity, ease of doing procedures and cost versus prior art
The purpose of the invention is easiest clarified by first a brief comparison to prior art.
The invention drape system is shown in
The drape 1, preferably translucent, can be transparent. In the embodiment of
The translucent sheet 1 is constructed from readily available plastic film used in the medical field, for example, vinyl (such as polyvinyl chloride), polyethylene, polypropylene, polycarbonate, polyester, silicone elastomer, acetate and so forth film materials. In selecting a film material for use as sheet 1, factors such as the softness of the film, the ease of application of the film when used as a male drape, adaptability of the film to body contour, patient comfort and wrinkle stiffening properties of the film can be evaluated. For example, a 3 mil (0.070 mm) soft grade vinyl film can be used for construction of sheet 1. Sheet 1 may be constructed of plastic film used in forming prior art drape materials, for example, plastic film of about 1 to 5 mil (0.025 to 0.125 mm) in thickness. A sheet made of soft material may need to be made thicker than a drape made of a harder grade material in order to provide similar stiffening effects.
The male drape of the present invention must be sterile as packaged and remains sterile until use. The inventive drape can be uncoated or completely or partially coated or impregnated with agents known in the art, such as antibacterial, adhesive and sealing compounds.
The sealing ring 6 or sealing ring 16 that is attached to the drape 1 can be formed of a material which possess the same degree of flexibility and rigidity as, or be softer or more rigid than the film material used for sheet 1. For example, sealing ring 6 or sealing ring 16 may be die cut from a soft sheet material or molded as a more rigid plastic material. Soft sealing ring materials may provide better patient comfort while still functioning as an adaptable gasket. On the other hand, harder sealing ring materials provide a greater dimensional stability. Routine experimentation will provide a sealing ring possessing a balance of desired properties. For example, the sealing ring 6 or sealing ring 16 may be constructed of a silicone elastomer, or could be made of a soft sponge-like material. It may furthermore be made of a homogeneous material or coated or infused with antibacterial or liquid sealing agents.
The degree of partial penetration of the male glans by drape aperture 4 and by sealing ring 6 as depicted in
In
Now referring to
In
The sealed separation of a top side from a bottom side provided by this drape can now preferably also be utilized to create an improved liquid waste collection system that reduces liquids reaching the patient, the operating table or the floor.
In
On top of the drape 1 is placed one or more absorbing pads 21 with a penile notch 22 in suitable positions to collect liquids emerging during the procedure. The sealed aperture 4 reduces chance for liquids reaching the rest of the patient body and operating table.
Upon completion of the urology procedure shown in
While the foregoing written description of the invention enables one of ordinary skill to make and use what is considered presently to be the best mode thereof, those of ordinary skill will understand and appreciate the existence of variations, combinations, and equivalents of the specific embodiment, method, and examples herein. The invention should therefore not be limited by the above described embodiment, method, and examples, but by all embodiments and methods within the scope and spirit of the invention as claimed.
This application claims benefit of provisional application 61/441,267, filed Feb. 9, 2011.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/024246 | 2/8/2012 | WO | 00 | 9/20/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/109306 | 8/16/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2842130 | Seidler | Jul 1958 | A |
3799161 | Collins | Mar 1974 | A |
4588397 | Giacalone | May 1986 | A |
4622962 | Kauffman | Nov 1986 | A |
4834711 | Greenfield et al. | May 1989 | A |
4903710 | Jessamine et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5238009 | House | Aug 1993 | A |
5275177 | Wilk | Jan 1994 | A |
5388593 | Thomalla | Feb 1995 | A |
5795334 | Cochrane, III | Aug 1998 | A |
6705324 | Petersvik | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6966320 | Baynes | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7299803 | Kovac et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20040254512 | Paturu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050115570 | Hare et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060207609 | Gil | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070175487 | Eid | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080236598 | Gobel | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090277460 | Carrez | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100145314 | Hazan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100192960 | Rotolo | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201036566 | Mar 2008 | CN |
1 500 009 | Nov 1974 | GB |
2 372 451 | Aug 2002 | GB |
8102515 | Sep 1981 | WO |
2009012336 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140007886 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61441267 | Feb 2011 | US |