Surgical guides and processes for producing and using the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11806028
  • Patent Number
    11,806,028
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 30, 2022
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 7, 2023
    6 months ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • RESTOR3D, INC. (Durham, NC, US)
  • Examiners
    • Robert; Eduardo C
    • Negrelli-Rodriguez; Christina
    Agents
    • Husch Blackwell LLP
    • Stewart; Bryan D.
    • Landsman; Andrew C.
Abstract
Provided herein are 3D-printed patient-specific surgical guides and methods for making and using the same. In at least one embodiment, the guides include a first and second end, a first and second side, a conformal bone engaging surface, a front surface, one or more porous regions, one or more walls, and a plurality of openings. At least one of the plurality of openings extends through the guide between the conformal bone engaging surface and the front surface. The conformal bone engaging surface is contoured to a patient's anatomy. The first and second end, and the first and second side are contoured to avoid soft tissues of the patient.
Description
BACKGROUND

Surgical guides may be used to align patient anatomy for bone resection in various orthopedic surgeries such as total or partial joint replacements (e.g., ankle, knee, shoulder, hip, toe, or elbow joint replacements, among others.). Accurate bone resection relates to implant performance because implants are placed to appose the remaining bone. As such, ensuring that a surgical guide remains in a desired position may be important because incorrect positioning between the guide and bone may cause inaccurate bone resection and therefore inaccurate implant placement, which, in turn, may cause poor implant performance and premature failure. Current surgical guides may be relatively smooth-surfaced and constructed from smooth materials such as plastic, thus exhibiting negative surface roughness and increasing the likelihood of slippage.


As a result, there is a long-felt, but unsolved need for improved surgical guides for orthopedic surgeries and methods of producing and installing the same.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Briefly described, aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to patient-specific surgical guides configured to assist in the positioning of other intraoperative devices and prevent the guide itself from slipping when in contact with a patient bone, as well as processes for making and using the same. According to a first aspect, the present disclosure relates to a patient-specific surgical guide comprising a 3D-printed body comprising (i) a metallic material; (ii) a front surface; (iii) a conformal bone engaging surface opposite the front surface and contoured to a patient's anatomy, the conformal bone engaging surface comprising one or more gyroid structure regions; and (iv) a plurality of openings extending through the 3D-printed body between the conformal bone engaging surface and the front surface, wherein: at least one of the plurality of openings is sized to receive a surgical instrument for resecting a portion of the patient's anatomy; and the one or more gyroid structure regions comprise: i) an average pore depth of 0.2 mm to 2.0 mm; and ii) a minimum feature size of 0.1 mm to 2 mm.


According to a second aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the first aspect or any other aspect, wherein at least one of the gyroid structure regions has an effective radius of 0.5 mm to 1 mm.


According to a third aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the second aspect or any other aspect, wherein: the 3D-printed body comprises one or more walls; and at least one of the plurality of openings extends through the one or more walls.


According to a fourth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the third aspect or any other aspect, wherein: the 3D-printed body comprises a first end, a second end, a first side, and a second side; and the first end, the second end, the first side, and the second side are contoured to avoid at least one soft tissue structure of the patient's anatomy.


According to a fifth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the fourth aspect or any other aspect, wherein the at least one of the plurality of openings is an elongate slot.


According to a sixth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the fifth aspect or any other aspect, wherein the surgical instrument comprises a saw blade.


According to a seventh aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the sixth aspect or any other aspect, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is a structural opening.


According to an eighth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the sixth aspect or any other aspect, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is a securement hole.


According to a ninth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the sixth aspect or any other aspect, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is an alignment hole.


The present disclosure also relates to a surgical guide that, in some embodiments, advantageously adheres to bone surfaces, such as, for example, a partially to fully rough-surfaced talar resection guide. According to a tenth aspect, the present disclosure related to a patient-specific surgical guide comprising (i) a rigid material; (ii) a front surface; (iii) a conformal bone engaging surface opposite the front surface and contoured to a patient's anatomy, the conformal bone engaging surface comprising one or more porous regions; and (iv) a plurality of openings extending through the 3D-printed body between the conformal bone engaging surface and the front surface, wherein: at least one of the plurality of openings is sized to receive a surgical instrument for resecting a portion of the patient's anatomy; and the one or more porous regions comprise an average pore depth of 0.2 mm to 2.0 mm.


According to an eleventh aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the tenth aspect or any other aspect, wherein: the 3D-printed body comprises a first end, a second end, a first side, and a second side; and the first end, the second end, the first side, and the second side are contoured to avoid at least one soft tissue structure of the patient's anatomy.


According to a twelfth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the eleventh aspect or any other aspect, wherein at least one of the one or more porous regions has an effective radius of 0.5 mm to 1 mm.


According to a thirteenth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the twelfth aspect or any other aspect, wherein at least one of the one or more porous regions has a minimum feature size of 0.1 mm to 2 mm.


According to a fourteenth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the thirteenth aspect or any other aspect, wherein the one or more porous regions comprise a gyroid structure.


According to a fifteenth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the fourteenth aspect or any other aspect, wherein the rigid material comprises a metallic material.


According to a sixteenth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the fifteenth aspect or any other aspect, wherein the at least one opening of the plurality of openings is an elongate slot.


According to a seventeenth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the sixteenth aspect or any other aspect, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is a structural opening.


According to an eighteenth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the sixteenth aspect or any other aspect, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is a securement hole.


According to a nineteenth aspect, the patient-specific surgical guide of the sixteenth aspect or any other aspect, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is an alignment hole.


The present disclosure also relates to a method for using a patient-specific surgical guide and comprising, according to a twentieth aspect, (i) receiving a 3D-printed patient-specific surgical guide, the patient-specific surgical guide comprising (a) a rigid material; (b) a front surface; (c) a conformal bone engaging surface opposite the front surface and contoured to patient anatomy, the conformal bone engaging surface comprising one or more porous regions; the one or more porous regions comprising an average pore depth of 0.2 mm to 2.0 mm; and a minimum feature size of 0.1 mm to 2 mm; (d) a plurality of openings extending through the 3D-printed body between the conformal bone engaging surface and the front surface and sized to receive a surgical instrument for resecting a portion of the patient anatomy; (ii) intraoperatively engaging the conformal bone engaging surface with the patient anatomy; (iii) inserting the surgical instrument through the elongate slot; and (iv) resecting a portion of the patient anatomy based on the placement of the patient-specific surgical guide.


According to a twenty-first aspect, the method of the twentieth aspect or any other aspect, further comprising the step of pressing at least one of the one or more porous regions of the patient-specific surgical guide onto soft tissues surrounding the patient anatomy.


It will be understood by those skilled in the art that one or more aspects of this disclosure can meet certain objectives, while one or more other aspects can lead to certain other objectives. Various modifications to the illustrated embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles herein can be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from embodiments of the disclosure. Other objects, features, benefits, and advantages of the present disclosure will be apparent in this summary and descriptions of the disclosed embodiments, and will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Such objects, features, benefits, and advantages will be apparent from the above as taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures and all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an exemplary tibial resection guide, according to one embodiment;



FIG. 2 is a side view of the exemplary tibial resection guide of FIG. 1, according to one embodiment;



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the exemplary tibial resection guide of FIG. 1, showing the guide mounted to a bone surface, according to one embodiment;



FIG. 4 is a side view of the exemplary tibial resection guide of FIG. 1, showing the guide mounted to a bone surface, according to one embodiment;



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of an exemplary talar resection guide, according to one embodiment;



FIG. 6 is a front view of the exemplary talar resection guide of FIG. 5, showing the guide mounted to a bone surface, according to one embodiment; and



FIG. 7 is a perspective view of the exemplary talar resection guide of FIG. 5, showing the guide mounted to a bone surface, according to one embodiment;



FIG. 8 is a flow chart of an exemplary surgical guide manufacturing process, according to one embodiment; and



FIG. 9 is a flow chart of an exemplary surgical process, according to one embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

According to particular embodiments, this disclosure relates to surgical guides with features for improved contact between the guide and a patient bone or bones. It may be advantageous to increase the frictional fit between the guide and patient bones to help prevent guide creep or motion that may affect cut accuracy. For example, if a guide is precisely aligned with patient anatomy to remove a portion of patient bone and then the guide moves slightly, the user may make an imprecise cut with the slightly misaligned guide and a corresponding patient-specific implant may not fit as well.


Further, patient-specific guides may be produced to provide accurate bone removal for installation of patient-specific implants. Patient-specific surgical guides are designed to contact the patient's bone and to sit in a specific position to define the position of the bone resection relative to the patient's anatomy. For example, when performing an ankle arthroplasty or arthrodesis, the optimal location for placing the surgical guide may be on a relatively smooth surface of the underlying bone, and it may be challenging to maintain accurate placement of the surgical guide throughout the bone resection procedure due to a relatively low coefficient of friction between the guide and the smooth bone surface.


The surgical guide may be constructed from any suitable material. In at least one embodiment, the surgical guide is 3D-printed or otherwise created via additive manufacturing in a metallic material, including, but not limited to titanium, stainless steel, or cobalt chrome. In certain embodiments, the material selection may be beneficial under medical imaging techniques (e.g., CT scanning, X-rays) and may cause the guide to be visible in contrast to underlying patient anatomy. According to particular embodiments, the surgical guide includes a plurality of materials, each material associated with a different region or level of roughness or porosity. In embodiments where the guide is constructed from one or more materials, certain areas or macroscopic features of the guide may appear differently under medical imaging/fluoroscopic techniques, thereby alerting the user to the positioning of various fixation features.


Pre-operative planning of resection surgeries may be assisted by patient imaging (e.g., CT scans, MRIs, X-rays, etc.), thus allowing a user to define the desired implant placement and corresponding bone resection for the particular patient anatomy. In these embodiments (and others), a user and/or a device guide manufacturer may perform the following steps: access the patient imaging scan, evaluate its parameters for acceptability, segment the scan, create 3D reconstructions of the scanned anatomy (such as in a CAD environment), and then employ 3D printing techniques, among other manufacturing techniques, to create the surgical guide.


The resulting guide contains patient-matched surfaces which are used by the user to aid in the placement of preoperative and intraoperative instruments, thereby ensuring accurate placement of intraoperative instruments and of the surgical guide itself. The user may then adjust the position of the instruments according to various degrees of freedom to achieve a final position, and may then proceed with the rest of the orthopedic procedure. In some embodiments, the surgical guide may comprise various walls and openings according to patient-specific needs and resulting in an at least partial polygonal, angular, convex, concave, or otherwise suitable shape. In other embodiments, the surgical guide may be entirely patient-specific such that the guide encompasses an organic shape of varying thicknesses (e.g., without walls and/or hard angles and comprising minimal material).


In various embodiments, the surgical guide discussed herein includes a porous or otherwise textured structure (e.g., a triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structure, including, but not limited to, a gyroid structure; or a pattern of geometric shapes embossed onto a surface) to increase the anisotropic frictional force (e.g., frictional fit, expulsion resistance, sheer force, gripping force, etc.) between bone and the guide. In some embodiments, the surgical guide includes other features for guiding surgical instruments (e.g., saw blades, bone mills, drills, burrs, reamers, etc.) for resecting the bone where the guide is fixed in place to prevent its motion relative to the bone and other certain surgical instruments cutting or resecting the bone. In various embodiments, the surgical guide includes features that enable a user to view different portions of patient anatomy, or mark or otherwise note different patient anatomical features which may help the user place an implant.


In at least one embodiment, the surgical guide includes a smooth region and a porous region that may additionally include a gyroid structure region. The surgical guide mates with underlying patient anatomy wherein a patient-contacting surface, or conformal bone engaging surface, of the guide at least partially includes a porous structure. In various embodiments, the depth of porosity is a function of the potential thickness of soft tissue on an exterior of bone plus an additional depth factor. In some embodiments, the porous portions of the conformal bone engaging surface may have an average depth between 0.2 mm and 2 mm. The porous regions may be defined as a function of minimum feature size (e.g., wall thickness, geometric features, etc.) in a range of 0.1 mm to 2 mm. In one or more embodiments, the porous region may have an “aspect ratio” defined by the depth of the porous region relative to the effective radius of the porous region, the latter of which may be between 0.5 mm and 1 mm. Depending on the use case (e.g., upper extremities, lower extremities, etc.) or on the type of patient anatomy to be contacted by the guide (e.g., bones, osteophytes, etc.), the aspect ratio may be increased or decreased. In some embodiments, cartilage, periosteum, and other soft tissues are not contacted by the guide.


According to one or more embodiments, the patient-facing surface may include an entirely porous and/or gyroid structure. In other embodiments, some but not all portions of the patient-facing surface may include a porous and/or gyroid structure. The porous and/or gyroid structures of patient-facing surfaces of alternative embodiments may be between 15 and 85 percent of the patient-facing surface area. Thus, during an orthopedic procedure, the depth of the porous region and the overall aspect ratio may improve the positional stability of the surgical guide due to increased resistance to lateral displacement forces and increased anisotropic frictional force between the guide and the patient anatomy, the latter of which may include a variety of tissue structures.


The surgical guide may include certain macroscopic features that may help the user in performing orthopedic surgeries. For example, the surgical guide may include through-hole openings along any portion of its surface for nails, screws, K-wires, or any other suitable object to secure the guide in an optimal position on an underlying patient bone. Some embodiments may include through-slots that may be used to guide surgical instruments (e.g., oscillating saws, drills, drill burs, etc.) on prescribed paths along the underlying bone. Additionally, there may be alignment holes along any surface of the surgical guide that may assist in additional positional adjustments of surgical guide placement. In at least one embodiment, the overall guide size is correlated with patient-specific anatomy.


The above features (and others) will be discussed herein in the context of specific surgical guide types (e.g., an ankle resection guide). However, it will be understood that the concepts discussed here are applicable to any suitable surgical guide used anywhere in a human (or other animal), such as the hands, feet, shoulders, knees, elbows, face, head, arms, legs, hips, pelvis, spine, back, etc., and are applicable to any procedure or surgical guide, including those for bunion surgery (e.g., Lapidus fusion) and like procedures.


Referring now to the drawing figures, FIGS. 1 and 2 show an exemplary surgical guide 100. In this embodiment, the surgical guide 100 is a tibial resection guide and is aligned with a patient ankle joint 10. A human ankle joint 10 is the area where the foot and the leg meet, and includes three bones that join together to form a hinge joint. Tibia 25 and fibula 30 connect from the knee to the ankle, acting as a mortise and forming the top of the hinge joint in which the body of a talus 15 fits (the lower part of the ankle), and which acts as a tenon. The ankle includes three smaller joints: the talocrural joint, the subtalar joint, and the inferior tibiofibular joint. The movements produced at the ankle joint 10 are dorsiflexion and plantarflexion of the foot.


In the embodiment shown, the surgical guide 100 includes a first end 105 and a second end 110, where the first end 105 is placed over a portion of the tibia 25 and next to the fibula 30, and the second end 110 is placed over a portion of the tibia 25 and next to the talus 15 such that the second end 110 avoids contact with patient cartilage. The surgical guide 100 also includes a first side 115 and a second side 120, where the first side 115 is positioned toward a lateral side of the ankle joint 10 and the second side 120 is positioned toward a medial side of the ankle joint 10. As will be discussed with reference to FIG. 3, a conformal bone engaging surface 125, which may be patient-specific, contacts one or more of the aforementioned bones of the ankle joint 10.


In various embodiments, the second end 110 may be pronged or otherwise constructed in order to avoid contact with soft tissues such as cartilage. The second end 110 includes two prongs 111, 112 spaced substantially near the medial and lateral sides of the talus 15. The prongs 111, 112 may aid in the positioning of the guide 100 over the tibia 25 such that the guide 100 is flush against the tibia 25, and avoids contact with soft tissues and the talus 15. In alternate embodiments, there may be any suitable number of prongs or other support structures at any suitable spacing intervals on the second end 110 in accordance with the principles of this disclosure.


In the embodiments shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the surgical guide 100 defines one or more structural openings 155. The one or more structural openings 155 are located on a front surface 135 of the surgical guide 100, and extend through the body of the guide 100 and to a conformal bone engaging surface (shown in FIG. 3), forming one or more walls 130. The one or more structural openings 155 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 are generally of a polygonal shape, but in other embodiments they may be any suitable shape or size to form walls of any suitable shape, size, and/or thickness. Additionally, the one or more structural openings 155 may aid in the structural integrity of the guide 100, reduce compositional material usage, or serve any other suitable purpose.


The surgical guide 100 may include a front surface 135 that may be generally planar or have a contour that conforms to the patient (e.g., in a guide that is used in a procedure where both sides of a guide contact patient anatomy. The front surface 135 may include one or more slots 140. The one or more slots 140 may have a length longer than their width, and extend through the body of the guide 100 to a bone engaging surface. The one or more slots 140 may be situated on any portion of the front surface 135 without departing from the principles of this disclosure, generally wherever a user may find it beneficial to access and/or resect portions of the patient's bone visible through the one or more slots 140. In at least one embodiment, the one or more slots 140 may be beneficial for various resection techniques, allowing a user to use a variety of surgical equipment. As will be discussed with reference to FIG. 3, the one or more slots 140 may be at least partially defined by various dimensions including depth and length.


The front surface 135 may include one or more securement holes 150. The one or more securement holes 150 may have a circular or ovular shape, and extend through the guide 100 to a conformal bone engaging surface (shown in FIG. 3). The one or more securement holes 150 may be positioned on any portion of the front surface 135 without departing from the principles of this disclosure, generally wherever a user may find it beneficial to secure the guide 100 to the patient bone. In at least one embodiment, the one or more securement holes 150 may be beneficial for securing the surgical guide 100 in place through use of equipment including, but not limited to, K-wires, nails, screws, or any other suitable attachment mechanism. As will be discussed with reference to FIG. 3, the one or more securement holes 150 may be at least partially defined by various dimensions including depth and length.


The surgical guide 100 may further include one or more alignment holes 145. The one or more alignment holes 145 have a generally circular or ovular shape and extend through various walls of the surgical guide (further discussed with FIG. 4). The one or more alignment holes 145 may generally be aligned with respect to each other, thereby allowing a user to utilize the one or more alignment holes 145 to accurately position the surgical guide 100 and/or other surgical equipment, amongst serving other purposes. As will be discussed with reference to FIG. 4, the one or more alignment holes 145 may be at least partially defined by various dimensions including depth and length.


Turning now to FIG. 3, the conformal bone engaging surface 125 of the surgical guide 100 is shown. In some embodiments, the conformal bone engaging surface 125 exhibits a relatively rough texture in relation to other surfaces of the surgical guide 100. In one or more embodiments, the conformal bone engaging surface 125 is a porous surface and may optionally include a gyroid structure or any other suitable design without departing from the principles of this disclosure. The porous surface may be beneficial for keeping the surgical guide 100 in place during an orthopedic procedure (in case of guide 100 slippage) due to its texture, thus the surface 125 may exhibit a relatively high anisotropic resistance to various forces. The porous surface structure (and/or the entire guide 100) may be 3D printed to obtain a high degree of customizability in the surgical guide 100 for different patient applications.


In various embodiments, the surgical guide 100 includes one or more walls 130 (including, but not limited to, 130A, 130B, 130C), each of which may have a wall thickness 132 measuring between about 1.0-2.0 mm, or about 2.0-3.0 mm, or about 3.0-4.0 mm, or about 4.0-5.0 mm. Generally speaking, walls forming the area around the one or more securement holes 150 may vary in thickness in relation to walls forming the area around other portions of the surgical guide 100.



FIG. 3 also shows exemplary dimensions of the one or more slots 140 and one or more securement holes 150. As shown in this embodiment, the one or more slots 140 and the one or more securement holes 150 run through the front surface 135 and the conformal bone engaging surface 125. In various embodiments, the one or more slots 140 include a length 160, width 165, and depth 170. The length 160 and width 170 may vary depending on the specific patient case and use case (e.g., different resection techniques), but may generally be between 5 millimeters and 20 millimeters. In at least one embodiment, the depth 170 is between 5 millimeters to 50 millimeters, but this may be any suitable depth. In various embodiments, the securement holes 150 include a diameter 175 and depth 180. The diameter 170 may vary depending on the specific patient and use case, but may generally be between 3 and 15 millimeters. In at least one embodiment, the depth 180 is between 5 millimeters to 50 millimeters, but this may be any suitable depth.


As shown in this embodiment, the alignment holes 145 extend through a subset of certain walls 130 of the surgical guide 100, including, in this example, a first side wall 130A, second side wall 130B, and a middle wall 130C.


As shown in FIG. 3, the second end 110 includes one or more prongs 111, 112 that extend downwardly from the surgical guide 100. In at least one embodiment, the one or more prongs are angled away from the conformal bone engaging surface 125 to avoid certain anatomical structures (e.g., cartilage, bones such as the talus, etc.). The lengths and angled nature of the prongs 111, 112 may vary depending on patient anatomy. For example, the prongs 111, 112 may be of different lengths or the same length with respect to each other.


Turning now to FIG. 4, exemplary dimensions of the one or more alignment holes 145 are shown. In various embodiments, the one or more alignment holes 145 include a diameter 185 and depth 190 (seen in FIG. 3). The diameter 185 may vary depending on the specific patient case and use case, but may generally be between 2 and 15 millimeters. In at least one embodiment, the depth 190 is between 1 millimeter to 5 millimeters, corresponding with wall thickness 132, but this may be any suitable depth.


Now referring to FIGS. 5 and 6, a surgical guide 200 is shown as an exemplary talar resection guide 200 bearing several similarities to the features of the exemplary tibial embodiments of FIGS. 1-4. In this embodiment, the surgical guide 200 is placed over a portion of the aforementioned patient ankle joint 10.


In the embodiment shown, the surgical guide includes a first end 205 and a second end 210, where the first end 205 is placed below a lowest surface of the tibia 25 and fibula 30 in contact with the talus 15, and the second end 210 is positioned above the calcaneus 20 in contact with the talus 15 such that the second end 210 avoids contact with patient cartilage. The surgical guide also includes a first side 215 and a second side 220, where the first side 215 is positioned toward a lateral side of the ankle joint 10 and the second side 220 is positioned toward a medial side of the ankle joint 10. As will be discussed with reference to FIG. 7, a conformal bone engaging surface 225 contacts the aforementioned bones of the ankle joint 10.


In various embodiments, the second end 210 is at least partially patient-specific and may be pronged or otherwise constructed in order to contact the talus 15 and calcaneus 20 and avoid contact with soft tissues such as cartilage. As shown in FIG. 7, the second end 210 includes four prongs 211, 212, 213, 214 spaced at the medial and lateral sides of the talus 15. The prongs 211, 212, 213, 214 may aid in the positioning of the guide 100 over the talus 15 and calcaneus 20 such that the guide 200 is flush against the talus 15 and calcaneus 20, and avoids contact with soft tissues. In at least one embodiment, the prongs 211, 212, 213, 214 map to a specific surface of a patient's anatomy and are spaced to avoid cartilage, tendons, etc., but to provide support to the guide via contact with patient bone. In some embodiments, the spacing and contour of the prongs 211, 212, 213, 214 may allow for bone resection instrument articulation.


In alternate embodiments, there may be any suitable number of prongs or other support structures at any suitable spacing intervals on the second end 210 in accordance with the principles of this disclosure. In some embodiments, the portions of the prongs of the second end 210 that contact the talus 15 and calcaneus 20 may include one or more porous regions, thereby increasing the frictional fit between the talus 15 and calcaneus 20 and the overall guide 100. Further, the prongs 211, 212, 213, 214 of the second end 210 may contact the talus 15 and/or calcaneus 20 at an angle (shown in FIG. 7).


The surgical guide 200 may include one or more structural openings 255. The one or more structural openings 255 are located on a front surface 135 of the surgical guide 200, and extend through the body of the guide 200 and to a conformal bone engaging surface (shown in FIG. 7), forming one or more walls 230. The one or more structural openings 255 shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 are generally of a polygonal shape, but in other embodiments there may be any suitable number of structural openings 255, and they may be any suitable shape or size to form walls of any suitable shape, size, and/or thickness. The one or more structural openings 255 may aid in the structural integrity of the guide 200, reduce compositional material usage, or serve any other suitable purpose.


The surgical guide 200 may include a front surface 235 that may be generally flat or may be patient conforming. The front surface 235 may include one or more slots 240. The one or more slots 240 may have a length longer than its width, and extend through the body of the guide 100 to a conformal bone engaging surface (shown in FIG. 7). The one or more slots 240 may be situated on any portion of the front surface 235 without departing from the principles of this disclosure, generally wherever a user may find it beneficial to access and/or resect portions of the patient bone visible through the one or more slots 240. In at least one embodiment, the one or more slots 240 may be additionally beneficial for various resection techniques, allowing a user to use a wide variety of surgical equipment. As will be discussed with reference to FIG. 7, the one or more slots 240 may be at least partially defined by various dimensions including depth and length.


The front surface 235 may include one or more securement holes 250. The one or more securement holes 250 may have a circular or ovular shape, and extend through the guide 200 to a conformal bone engaging surface. The one or more securement holes 250 may be situated on any portion of the front surface 235 without departing from the principles of this disclosure, generally wherever a user may find it beneficial to secure the guide 200 to the patient bone. In at least one embodiment, the one or more securement holes 250 may be beneficial for securing the surgical guide 200 in place through use of equipment including, but not limited to, K-wires, nails, screws, or any other suitable attachment mechanism. As will be discussed with reference to FIG. 7, the one or more securement holes 250 may be at least partially defined by various dimensions including depth and length.


In various embodiments, the surgical guide 200 includes one or more walls 230, each of which may have a wall thickness 232 measuring between about 1.0-2.0 mm, or about 2.0-3.0 mm, or about 3.0-4.0 mm, or about 4.0-5.0 mm. Generally speaking, walls forming the area around the one or more securement holes 150 may vary in thickness in relation to walls forming the area around other portions of the surgical guide 200. Additionally, similar to the embodiments of FIGS. 1-4, alternative embodiments of the surgical guide 200 may include any number of suitable alignment holes (not pictured) which extend through a subset of the walls 230.


Turning now to FIG. 7, the conformal bone engaging surface 225 of surgical guide 200 is shown. In some embodiments, the conformal bone engaging surface 225 may exhibit a relatively rough texture in relation to other surfaces of the surgical guide 200. In other embodiments, the conformal bone engaging surface 225 is a porous surface and may optionally include a gyroid structure or any other suitable design without departing from the principles of this disclosure. In at least one embodiment, the porous surface is beneficial for keeping the surgical guide 200 in place during an orthopedic procedure (in case of guide 200 slippage) due to its texture, thus the conformal bone engaging surface 225 may exhibit a relatively high anisotropic resistance to various forces. The porous surface (and/or the entire guide) may be 3D printed in order to obtain a high degree of customizability in the surgical guide 200 for different patient applications.



FIG. 7 shows exemplary dimensions of the one or more slots 240 and one or more securement holes 250. As shown in this embodiment, the one or more slots 240 and one or more securement holes 250 run through the front surface 235 and out the conformal bone engaging surface 225. In various embodiments, the one or more slots 240 include a length 260, width 265, and depth 270. The length 260 and width 270 may vary depending on the specific patient case and use case (e.g., different resection techniques), but may generally be between 5 millimeters and 20 millimeters. In at least one embodiment, the depth 270 is between 5 millimeters to 50 millimeters, but may be any suitable depth. In various embodiments, the securement 250 include a diameter 275 and depth 280. The diameter 270 may vary depending on the specific patient case and use case, but may generally be between 3 and 15 millimeters. In at least one embodiment, the depth 280 is between 5 millimeters to 50 millimeters, but this may be any suitable depth.


Referring now to FIG. 8, in at least one embodiment, the surgical guide structures are produced by 3D printing manufacturing methods. As will be understood from discussions herein, the exemplary guides that include patient-specific and porous structures may be produced via additive manufacturing (e.g., 3D printing) techniques that produce the entirety of the guides on a layer-by-layer basis. In other words, in at least some embodiments, the guides discussed herein have integrally formed porous surfaces that are created with the rest of the surgical guide (e.g., a porous surface is not added via post-processing). In other embodiments, guides discussed herein may include porosity added via post-processing.


The process 300 generally starts with step 310, receiving and processing patient imaging data. In various embodiments, the patient imaging data can be one or more DICOM files, series of 2D images, or any other type of suitable imaging data. This includes imaging data from anywhere in the body, such as the hands, feet, shoulders, knees, elbows, face, head, arms, legs, hips, pelvis, spine, back, etc.


Based on the received patient imaging data, at step 320, the system generates a 3D model of a patient-specific surgical guide based on received patient imaging data. In various embodiments, the 3D model may be produced based on a 3D model of patient anatomy (also produced by the system) or might be based on previously produced guides. As discussed herein, the patient-specific surgical guide may include at least one patient-specific surface.


At step 330, the system converts at least a portion of the patient-specific surface into a porous micro-architecture. As discussed herein, the porous micro-architecture may be defined as including porous and/or gyroid structures. The porous micro-architecture may cover the entire patient-specific surface, some portions of the patent-specific surface, or certain percentages (such as 15-85%) of the patient-specific surface. As also discussed herein, the porous micro-architecture may be designed or created automatically by the system based on the received patient data (e.g., the system automatically adds a porous surface to the patient specific surface and adjusts the porous surface for a specific depth (e.g., based on aspect ratio or the like), length, size, area, etc.). The surgical guide may also include macro-architecture features, such as pins, nails, etc.


At step 340, the system generates a file for 3D-printing the patient-specific surgical guide based on the 3D model. In various embodiments, the system automatically combines the surface created at step 330 and the guide model produced at steps 320 to create a file readable by a 3D printer or like machine. In some embodiments the surface created at step 330 and the guide model produced at step 320 are produced together and modified to be read by a 3D-printer or like system.


At step 350, the system prints the patient-specific surgical guide including the patient-specific surface with the porous micro-architecture 350.



FIG. 9 describes a method 400 of using the surgical guide. The method 400 may generally include any of the above steps described in regard to FIG. 8, including, but not limited to scanning patient anatomy at step 410.


As shown in FIG. 9, a user (e.g., surgeon), receives a patient-specific surgical guide including a patient-specific surface, the patient-specific surface including a porous micro-architecture at step 420. As will be understood, the patient-specific surgical guide may include additional other instruments, guides, implants, or the like packaged with the guide or separately.


At step 430, the user intraoperatively contacts the patient-specific surface with patient anatomy, which includes the porous micro-architecture, with the patient anatomy in order press into soft tissues present on a bone surface.


At step 440, the user assesses and adjusts placement of the patient-specific guide under imaging techniques (e.g., CT scanning, standing x-rays). As discussed with regarding FIGS. 1-7, certain features of the patient-specific guide (e.g., one or more slots, one or more securement holes, one or more alignment holes, one or more structural openings) enable a user to adjust the positioning of the guide, such as the alignment and securement holes.


Once the user has positioned the patient-specific guide, the user applies pressure to the surgical guide such that the guide is sufficiently secured onto the patient anatomy at step 450. As discussed above, a depth of the porosity of the guide may account for a depth of any periosteum (plus an additional factor). In various embodiments, a user may exert force and “press” the patient-specific guide onto the patient anatomy in order to pierce through any periosteum present on a bone surface to contact the guide directly with the bony surface (or otherwise ensure the secure positioning of the guide on the patient anatomy).


At step 460, the user inserts surgical instruments through the plurality of openings.


As discussed herein, embodiments of the patient-specific guide are constructed from metals (e.g., titanium) as opposed to plastics, additional metal jigs may not be needed for the accurate positioning of the patient-specific guide on patient anatomy. This is due to the porous texture of the conformal bone engaging surface increasing the anisotropic frictional force between the guide and patient anatomy, the material composition allowing the guide to appear under medical imaging techniques, and because surgical tools may not be able to cut through metal.


At step 470, the user resects a portion of the patient anatomy based on the placement of the patient-specific surgical guide. As will be understood, a user may resect patient anatomy along slots, openings, and/or holes in the patient-specific surgical guide.


Exemplary processes for producing one of more implants corresponding to the patient-specific surgical guides can be found in the following patent and patent application incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in their entireties:


U.S. Pat. No. 11,026,798, issued on Jun. 8, 2021, and entitled SHEET BASED TRIPLY PERIODIC MINIMAL SURFACE IMPLANTS FOR PROMOTING OSSEOINTEGRATION AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING SAME; and


U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/314,378, filed on May 7, 2021, and entitled SPATIALLY VARIED IMPLANTS AND PROCESSES FOR MAKING AND USING SAME.


ALTERNATE EMBODIMENTS

It is understood that the present disclosure is highly customizable, and any type of surgical guide can be configured with any number and placement of slots, holes, additional recesses, and/or material textures of any shape and size to attach onto any type of bones. Additionally, while the embodiments shown herein may include various walls and openings that result in partially polygonal, angular, convex, concave, or otherwise suitable shapes of the surgical guide, other embodiments may be entirely patient-specific such that the guide encompasses an organic shape of varying thicknesses (e.g., without walls and/or hard angles and comprising minimal material). Furthermore, additional embodiments may be configured for use in various applications including, but not limited to, craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures involving the mandible, maxilla, and/or cranium.


The surgical guides discussed herein may include features to guide the depth of a cut by a surgical tool. For example, the guide may include a first “as-manufactured” instrument, the depth of which may be modified to interface with surgical tools such as a predetermined saw, drill, burr, or other assembly that may have an interfacing surface that “bottoms out” on the as-manufactured instrument. As described herein, “as-manufactured” may be construed to mean 3D printed or 3D printed and post-processed (which may further include material removal). In additional embodiments, any suitable second instrument may be coupled to the as-manufactured guide and may include a surface onto which the surgical tool may bottom out. In either case, the surface that the surgical tool bottoms out onto can be flat, angled, curvilinear, stepped, faceted, or other otherwise modified as per patient-specific attributes. In other embodiments, a third instrument may be coupled to the surgical tool that may include a flat, angled, curvilinear, stepped, faceted, or otherwise modified surface as per patient-specific attributes. The third instrument may bottom out onto either the as-manufactured guide or the second instrument coupled to the guide.


The surgical guides discussed herein may include additional visual and/or fluoroscopic features indicating depth, length, and/or angular measurement markings, or any other markings positioned at predetermined intervals. The markings may correlate with specific patient anatomy and may assist a user in performing surgical procedures and/or orientating the guide relative to the patient's anatomy.


Furthermore, the surgical guides discussed herein may be used in applications involving augmented reality (AR), where digital superimposition of virtual objects (e.g., CT scan of patient anatomy) onto physical objects (e.g., patient anatomy) or within space may aid the preoperative planning, surgical execution, and post operations of orthopedic procedures. In some embodiments, an optical tracking system may be applied to the surgical guides such that features of predetermined size (e.g., a section of a sphere) may be identified. Attachment points (e.g., threaded attachment holes) on the surgical guides may accept the placement of an optical tracking sensor detectable by the optical tracking system. The surgical guides may also be equipped with additional sensors connected to an AR and/or IoT system that assist with data preparation and recording, visualization, and registration/tracking, thereby improving information transfer and consideration during surgery, and offering opportunities for continuous learning.


For example, with reference to the embodiment of FIG. 1, the one or more securement holes 150, one or more alignment holes 145, and/or one or more slots 140 may be equipped with sensors that aid in optical tracking and data recordation. In connection with an AR and/or IoT system, the captured information may be interfaced with surgical tools that aid in correctly positioning the guide 100 over patient anatomy. AR and IoT capabilities may also streamline orthopedic procedures by controlling or partially controlling the operation of surgical tools (e.g., saw blades, drills), thereby yielding higher accuracy in surgical execution, reduction of radiation exposure, and decreased surgery time and mistakes.

Claims
  • 1. A patient-specific surgical guide comprising: a 3D-printed body comprising: a metallic material;a front surface;a conformal bone engaging surface opposite the front surface and contoured to a patient's anatomy, the conformal bone engaging surface comprising one or more gyroid structure regions; anda plurality of openings extending through the 3D-printed body between the conformal bone engaging surface and the front surface, wherein: at least one of the plurality of openings is sized to receive a surgical instrument for resecting a portion of the patient's anatomy; andthe one or more gyroid structure regions comprise: i) an average pore depth of 0.2 mm to 2.0 mm; and ii) a minimum feature size of 0.1 mm to 2 mm.
  • 2. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 1, wherein at least one of the gyroid structure regions has an effective radius of 0.5 mm to 1 mm.
  • 3. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 2, wherein: the 3D-printed body comprises one or more walls; andat least one of the plurality of openings extends through the one or more walls.
  • 4. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 3, wherein: the 3D-printed body comprises a first end, a second end, a first side, and a second side; andthe first end, the second end, the first side, and the second side are contoured to avoid at least one soft tissue structure of the patient's anatomy.
  • 5. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 4, wherein the at least one of the plurality of openings is an elongate slot.
  • 6. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 5, wherein the surgical instrument comprises a saw blade.
  • 7. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 6, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is a structural opening.
  • 8. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 6, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is a securement hole.
  • 9. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 6, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is an alignment hole.
  • 10. A patient-specific surgical guide comprising: a 3D-printed body comprising: a rigid material;a front surface;a conformal bone engaging surface opposite the front surface and contoured to a patient's anatomy, the conformal bone engaging surface comprising one or more porous regions; anda plurality of openings extending through the 3D-printed body between the conformal bone engaging surface and the front surface, wherein: at least one of the plurality of openings is sized to receive a surgical instrument for resecting a portion of the patient's anatomy; andthe one or more porous regions comprise an average pore depth of 0.2 mm to 2.0 mm.
  • 11. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 10, wherein: the 3D-printed body comprises a first end, a second end, a first side, and a second side; andthe first end, the second end, the first side, and the second side are contoured to avoid at least one soft tissue structure of the patient's anatomy.
  • 12. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 11, wherein at least one of the one or more porous regions has an effective radius of 0.5 mm to 1 mm.
  • 13. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 12, wherein at least one of the one or more porous regions has a minimum feature size of 0.1 mm to 2 mm.
  • 14. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 13, wherein the one or more porous regions comprise a gyroid structure.
  • 15. The patient-specific surgical guide claim 14, wherein the rigid material comprises a metallic material.
  • 16. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 15, wherein the at least one opening of the plurality of openings is an elongate slot.
  • 17. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 16, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is a structural opening.
  • 18. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 16, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is a securement hole.
  • 19. The patient-specific surgical guide of claim 16, wherein one or more of the plurality of openings is an alignment hole.
  • 20. A method for using a patient-specific surgical guide, the method comprising: receiving a 3D-printed patient-specific surgical guide, the patient-specific surgical guide comprising: a rigid material;a front surface;a conformal bone engaging surface opposite the front surface and contoured to patient anatomy, the conformal bone engaging surface comprising one or more porous regions;the one or more porous regions comprising: an average pore depth of 0.2 mm to 2.0 mm; anda minimum feature size of 0.1 mm to 2 mm;a plurality of openings extending through the 3D-printed patient-specific surgical guide between the conformal bone engaging surface and the front surface and sized to receive a surgical instrument for resecting a portion of the patient anatomy;intraoperatively engaging the conformal bone engaging surface with the patient anatomy;inserting the surgical instrument through an elongate slot; andresecting a portion of the patient anatomy based on the placement of the patient-specific surgical guide.
  • 21. The method of claim 20 further comprising the step of pressing at least one of the one or more porous regions of the patient-specific surgical guide onto soft tissues surrounding the patient anatomy.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/413,189 filed Oct. 4, 2022, entitled “SURGICAL GUIDES AND PROCESSES FOR PRODUCING AND USING THE SAME,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (365)
Number Name Date Kind
3872519 Giannestras Mar 1975 A
4440835 Vignaud Apr 1984 A
4588574 Felder et al. May 1986 A
4829152 Rostoker May 1989 A
5248456 Evans, Jr. et al. Sep 1993 A
6183519 Bonnin Feb 2001 B1
6419491 Ricci Jul 2002 B1
6461358 Faccioli Oct 2002 B1
7001672 Justin et al. Feb 2006 B2
7468075 Lang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7534246 Reiley May 2009 B2
7534263 Burdulis, Jr. et al. May 2009 B2
7534270 Ball May 2009 B2
D595853 Hanson Jul 2009 S
7618451 Berez et al. Nov 2009 B2
7632575 Justin et al. Dec 2009 B2
7634119 Tsougarakis et al. Dec 2009 B2
7666522 Justin et al. Feb 2010 B2
7717956 Lang May 2010 B2
D623749 Horton Sep 2010 S
7796791 Tsougarakis et al. Sep 2010 B2
7799077 Lang et al. Sep 2010 B2
7981158 Fitz et al. Jul 2011 B2
8062302 Lang et al. Nov 2011 B2
8066708 Lang et al. Nov 2011 B2
8077950 Tsougarakis et al. Dec 2011 B2
8083745 Lang et al. Dec 2011 B2
8094900 Steines et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105330 Fitz et al. Jan 2012 B2
8234097 Steines et al. Jan 2012 B2
D653756 Courtney et al. Feb 2012 S
8122582 Burdulis, Jr. et al. Feb 2012 B2
8142886 Noble et al. Mar 2012 B2
8337501 Fitz et al. Dec 2012 B2
8337507 Lang et al. Dec 2012 B2
D675320 Oi Jan 2013 S
8343218 Lang et al. Jan 2013 B2
8366771 Burdulis, Jr. et al. Feb 2013 B2
8377129 Fitz et al. Feb 2013 B2
8382755 Austin Feb 2013 B2
8430930 Hunt Apr 2013 B2
8439926 Bojarski et al. May 2013 B2
8457930 Schroeder Jun 2013 B2
8460304 Fitz et al. Jun 2013 B2
8480754 Bojarski et al. Jul 2013 B2
8485820 Ali Jul 2013 B1
8500740 Bojarski et al. Aug 2013 B2
8529568 Bouadi Sep 2013 B2
8529630 Bojarski et al. Sep 2013 B2
D692136 Tyber Oct 2013 S
8545569 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8551099 Lang et al. Oct 2013 B2
8551102 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8551103 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8551169 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8551173 Lechmann et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556906 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556907 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556971 Lang Oct 2013 B2
8556983 Bojarski et al. Oct 2013 B2
8561278 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8562611 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8562618 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8568479 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8568480 Fitz et al. Oct 2013 B2
8585708 Fitz et al. Nov 2013 B2
8617172 Fitz et al. Dec 2013 B2
8617242 Philipp et al. Dec 2013 B2
8623026 Wong et al. Jan 2014 B2
8634617 Tsougarakis et al. Jan 2014 B2
8638998 Steines et al. Jan 2014 B2
8641716 Fitz et al. Feb 2014 B2
8657827 Fitz et al. Feb 2014 B2
8682052 Fitz et al. Mar 2014 B2
8690945 Fitz et al. Apr 2014 B2
8709089 Lang et al. Apr 2014 B2
8715362 Reiley May 2014 B2
8735773 Lang May 2014 B2
D708747 Curran et al. Jul 2014 S
8768028 Lang et al. Jul 2014 B2
8771365 Bojarski et al. Jul 2014 B2
8775133 Schroeder Jul 2014 B2
8828311 Medina et al. Sep 2014 B2
8843229 Vanasse et al. Sep 2014 B2
8882847 Burdulis, Jr. et al. Nov 2014 B2
8888485 Ali Nov 2014 B2
8906107 Bojarski et al. Dec 2014 B2
8926706 Bojarski et al. Jan 2015 B2
8932363 Tsougarakis et al. Jan 2015 B2
D722693 Kaufmann et al. Feb 2015 S
8945230 Lang et al. Feb 2015 B2
8951259 Fitz et al. Feb 2015 B2
8951260 Lang et al. Feb 2015 B2
8965088 Tsougarakis et al. Feb 2015 B2
8974539 Bojarski et al. Mar 2015 B2
8998915 Fitz et al. Apr 2015 B2
9020788 Lang et al. Apr 2015 B2
9023050 Lang et al. May 2015 B2
9034237 Sperry et al. May 2015 B2
9055953 Lang et al. Jun 2015 B2
9066728 Burdulis, Jr. et al. Jun 2015 B2
9072531 Fitz et al. Jul 2015 B2
9084617 Lang et al. Jul 2015 B2
D735860 Palinchik Aug 2015 S
D736384 Palinchik Aug 2015 S
9095353 Burdulis, Jr. et al. Aug 2015 B2
9107679 Lang et al. Aug 2015 B2
9107680 Fitz et al. Aug 2015 B2
9113921 Lang et al. Aug 2015 B2
9125672 Fitz et al. Sep 2015 B2
9125673 Fitz et al. Sep 2015 B2
9144500 Harding Sep 2015 B2
9180015 Fitz et al. Nov 2015 B2
9180029 Hollister et al. Nov 2015 B2
9186161 Lang et al. Nov 2015 B2
9186254 Fitz et al. Nov 2015 B2
9186257 Geisler et al. Nov 2015 B2
D745159 Lin Dec 2015 S
9216025 Fitz et al. Dec 2015 B2
9220516 Lang et al. Dec 2015 B2
9220517 Lang et al. Dec 2015 B2
D747485 Oi Jan 2016 S
9241724 Lang et al. Jan 2016 B2
9241725 Lang et al. Jan 2016 B2
9271845 Hunt et al. Mar 2016 B2
9295482 Fitz et al. Mar 2016 B2
9295562 Lechmann et al. Mar 2016 B2
9308005 Fitz et al. Apr 2016 B2
9308053 Bojarski et al. Apr 2016 B2
9308060 Ali Apr 2016 B2
9308091 Lang Apr 2016 B2
9314256 Fitz et al. Apr 2016 B2
9320620 Bojarski et al. Apr 2016 B2
9295481 Fitz et al. May 2016 B2
9326780 Wong et al. May 2016 B2
9333058 Krastev May 2016 B1
9339279 Dubois et al. May 2016 B2
9358018 Fitz et al. Jun 2016 B2
9364896 Christensen et al. Jun 2016 B2
9370426 Gabbrielli et al. Jun 2016 B2
9375222 Fitz et al. Jun 2016 B2
9387079 Bojarski et al. Jun 2016 B2
9381025 Fitz et al. Jul 2016 B2
9402726 Linderman et al. Aug 2016 B2
9408615 Fitz et al. Aug 2016 B2
9408686 Miller et al. Aug 2016 B1
9415137 Meridew Aug 2016 B2
9421108 Hunt Aug 2016 B2
D767137 Lin Sep 2016 S
9433510 Lechmann et al. Sep 2016 B2
9433707 Swords et al. Sep 2016 B2
9439767 Bojarski et al. Sep 2016 B2
9486226 Chao Nov 2016 B2
9495483 Steines et al. Nov 2016 B2
9517134 Lang Dec 2016 B2
9545317 Hunt Jan 2017 B2
9549823 Hunt et al. Jan 2017 B2
9561115 Elahinia et al. Feb 2017 B2
9572669 Hunt et al. Feb 2017 B2
9579110 Bojarski et al. Feb 2017 B2
9597197 Lechmann et al. Mar 2017 B2
9603711 Bojarski et al. Mar 2017 B2
9610168 Terrill Apr 2017 B2
9636226 Hunt May 2017 B2
9636229 Lang et al. May 2017 B2
9649178 Ali May 2017 B2
9662157 Schneider et al. May 2017 B2
9662226 Wickham May 2017 B2
9668863 Sharp et al. Jun 2017 B2
9675465 Padovani et al. Jun 2017 B2
9675471 Bojarski et al. Jun 2017 B2
9681956 Al Hares et al. Jun 2017 B2
9687945 Steines et al. Jun 2017 B2
9688026 Ho et al. Jun 2017 B2
9694541 Pruett et al. Jul 2017 B2
9700420 Fitz et al. Jul 2017 B2
9700971 Lang Jul 2017 B2
9715563 Schroeder Jul 2017 B1
9737367 Steines et al. Aug 2017 B2
9750613 Petteys Sep 2017 B2
9757235 Hunt et al. Sep 2017 B2
9757245 O'Neil et al. Sep 2017 B2
9775680 Bojarski et al. Oct 2017 B2
9782270 Wickham Oct 2017 B2
9788972 Flickinger et al. Oct 2017 B2
9849019 Miller et al. Dec 2017 B2
9872773 Lang et al. Jan 2018 B2
9877790 Bojarski et al. Jan 2018 B2
D809661 Mueller et al. Feb 2018 S
9907670 Deridder et al. Mar 2018 B2
9910935 Golway et al. Mar 2018 B2
9913723 Fitz et al. Mar 2018 B2
9918849 Morris et al. Mar 2018 B2
9925054 Siegler Mar 2018 B2
9943370 Asseln et al. Apr 2018 B2
9943627 Zhou et al. Apr 2018 B2
9949839 Sander Apr 2018 B2
9956047 Bojarski et al. May 2018 B2
9956048 Bojarski et al. May 2018 B2
D829909 Horton Oct 2018 S
10085839 Wong et al. Oct 2018 B2
D835278 Gottlieb Dec 2018 S
10183442 Miller Jan 2019 B1
10245152 Kloss Apr 2019 B2
D849944 Dacosta May 2019 S
10278823 Xue May 2019 B1
D850620 Tyber Jun 2019 S
D855184 Predick Jul 2019 S
10357377 Nyahay Jul 2019 B2
D858769 Barela et al. Sep 2019 S
10449051 Hamzey Oct 2019 B2
10492686 Hunter Dec 2019 B2
D877907 Linder et al. Mar 2020 S
D878589 Linder Mar 2020 S
D878590 Linder et al. Mar 2020 S
D879295 Abbasi Mar 2020 S
D879961 Linder et al. Mar 2020 S
D881665 Zemel et al. Apr 2020 S
10624746 Jones et al. Apr 2020 B2
10667924 Nyahay Jun 2020 B2
10744001 Sack Aug 2020 B2
10772732 Miller et al. Sep 2020 B1
D899900 Blanco Oct 2020 S
10940015 Sack Mar 2021 B2
D920515 Miller May 2021 S
D920516 Miller May 2021 S
D920517 Miller May 2021 S
11026798 Miller Jun 2021 B1
11033394 Hamzey Jun 2021 B2
11135771 Reith Oct 2021 B1
D938033 Dang Dec 2021 S
11324525 Garvey May 2022 B1
11353277 Muceus Jun 2022 B2
11439726 Spence Sep 2022 B2
11471203 Sutika Oct 2022 B2
20040148032 Rutter et al. Jul 2004 A1
20060249875 Robb et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070100346 Wyss May 2007 A1
20070118243 Schroeder et al. May 2007 A1
20080206297 Roeder et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090093668 Marten et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090182430 Tyber et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100137990 Apatsidis et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168798 Clineff et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100286791 Goldsmith Nov 2010 A1
20110144752 Defelice et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110190898 Lenz Aug 2011 A1
20110224796 Weiland et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110230974 Musani Sep 2011 A1
20120064288 Nakano et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120215310 Sharp et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130068968 Daniel Mar 2013 A1
20130123935 Hunt et al. May 2013 A1
20130158651 Hollister et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130197657 Anca et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130218282 Hunt Aug 2013 A1
20130274890 Mckay Oct 2013 A1
20130296874 Chao Nov 2013 A1
20140100779 Tuke Apr 2014 A1
20140107785 Geisler et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140107786 Geisler et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140236299 Roeder et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140277443 Fleury et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277452 Skaer Sep 2014 A1
20140288650 Hunt Sep 2014 A1
20140336680 Medina et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140350688 Michel Nov 2014 A1
20140371863 Vanasse et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150105858 Papay et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150282945 Hunt Oct 2015 A1
20150282946 Hunt Oct 2015 A1
20150320461 Ehmke Nov 2015 A1
20150335434 Patterson et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150343709 Gerstle et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150351915 Defelice et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160008139 Siegler Jan 2016 A1
20160051371 Defelice et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160089138 Early et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160151833 Tsao Jun 2016 A1
20160193055 Ries Jul 2016 A1
20160199193 Willis et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160213485 Schaufler et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160213486 Nunley et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160213487 Wilson Jul 2016 A1
20160213488 Moore et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160220288 Dubois et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160256279 Sanders et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160256610 Zhou et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160270931 Trieu Sep 2016 A1
20160287388 Hunt et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160303793 Ermoshkin et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160333152 Cook et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160374829 Vogt Dec 2016 A1
20170014169 Dean et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170020685 Geisler et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170036403 Ruff et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170042697 Mcshane, III et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170056178 Sharp et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170056179 Lorio Mar 2017 A1
20170066873 Gardet Mar 2017 A1
20170105844 Kuyler et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170156880 Halverson et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170165085 Lechmann et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170165790 Mccarthy et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170172758 Field et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170182222 Paddock et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170018919 Reiley Jul 2017 A1
20170209274 Beerens et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170216035 Hunt Aug 2017 A1
20170216036 Cordaro Aug 2017 A1
20170239054 Engstrand et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170239064 Cordaro Aug 2017 A1
20170245998 Padovani et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170252165 Sharp et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170258606 Afzal Sep 2017 A1
20170282455 Defelice et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170296244 Schneider et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170319344 Hunt Nov 2017 A1
20170323037 Schroeder Nov 2017 A1
20170333205 Joly et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170354510 O'Neil et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170354513 Maglaras et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170355815 Becker et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170360488 Kowalczyk et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170360563 Hunt et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170360578 Shin et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170367843 Eisen et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170367844 Eisen et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170367845 Eisen et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180008419 Tyber et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180022017 Fukumoto et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180064540 Hunt Mar 2018 A1
20180085230 Hunt Mar 2018 A1
20180098858 Valderraband Apr 2018 A1
20180104063 Asaad Apr 2018 A1
20180110593 Khalil Apr 2018 A1
20180110626 Mcshane, III et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180110627 Sack Apr 2018 A1
20180117219 Yang et al. May 2018 A1
20180147319 Colucci-Mizenko et al. May 2018 A1
20180280140 Jones Oct 2018 A1
20180289380 Mauldin Oct 2018 A1
20180289515 Nemes et al. Oct 2018 A1
20190167433 Allen Jun 2019 A1
20190262101 Shanjani et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190343652 Petersheim et al. Nov 2019 A1
20200000595 Jones Jan 2020 A1
20200030102 Mullens et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200046512 Newman et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200085452 Siegler Mar 2020 A1
20200085585 Siegler Mar 2020 A1
20200155321 Dikovsky May 2020 A1
20200171752 Rogren Jun 2020 A1
20200171753 Satko Jun 2020 A1
20200367910 Hafez et al. Nov 2020 A1
20210077276 Garvey et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210216683 Rai Jul 2021 A1
20210298908 Holmes Sep 2021 A1
20210340334 Portela Nov 2021 A1
20220023048 Nolens Jan 2022 A1
20220087670 Selmoune Mar 2022 A1
20220134639 Allen May 2022 A1
20220142783 Ahmadi May 2022 A1
20220168109 Giordano Jun 2022 A1
20220296386 Fang Sep 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
109567913 Apr 2019 CN
110090096 Aug 2019 CN
69806985 Jun 2003 DE
1180989 Apr 2006 EP
2832321 Feb 2015 EP
2635239 Jul 2017 EP
2913030 Mar 2018 EP
3586800 Jan 2020 EP
3071400 Mar 2019 FR
4840886 Dec 2011 JP
301007894 May 2019 KR
2014020562 Feb 2014 WO
2020123295 Jun 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
Larraona et al., “Radiopaque material for 3D printing scaffolds”, XXXV Confreso Anual de la Sociedad Espanola de Ingenieria Biomedica. Bilbao, Nov. 29-Dec. 1, 2017, p. 451-454 (Year: 2017).
Rozema et al., The effects of different steam-sterilization programs on material properties of poly(l-lactide), Journal of Applied Biomaterials, vol. 2, 23-28 (1991) (Year: 1991).
Alt, Sami. “Design for Sterilization Part 1: Steam Sterillization.” Material, Material Technology Blog, Jun. 3, 2016, www.material-technology.com/single-post/2016/05/24/Design-for-Sterilization-part-1-Steam-Sterillization.
Ducheyne, Paul. “Comprehensive Biomaterials.” Comprehensive Biomaterials, vol. 1, Elsevier, 2011, pp. 135-135.
Anat Ratnovsky et al., Mechanical Properties of Different Airway Stents, Med. Eng'g. Physics, Mar. 2011, at 408., http://www.medengphys.com/article/S1350-4533(15)00042-9/fulltext.
Andrew T. Miller et al., Fatigue of Injection Molded and 30 Printed Polycarbonate Urethane in Solution, 108 Polymer 121 (2017).
Andrew T. Miller et al., Deformation and Fatigue of Tough 30 Printed Elastomer Scaffolds Processed by Fused 3 Deposition Modeling and Continuous Liquid Interface Production, 75 J. Mechanical Behavior Biomedical Materials 1 (2017).
Ortho Spine News, “SeaSpine Announces 25,000th NanoMetalene Implantation”, first available Dec. 18, 2019. (https://orthospinenews.com/2019/12/18/seaspine-announces-25000th-nanometalene-implantation/) (Year: 2019).
Restor3d, “Products”, first available Sep. 28, 2020. (https://web.archive.org/web/20200928123335/https:/restor3d.com/products) (Year: 2020).
Ortho Spine News, “Nvision Biomedical Technologies: First FDA Clearance for Osteotomy Wedge System”, first available Oct. 28, 2020. (https://orthospinenews.com/2020/10/28/nvision-biomedical-technologies-first-fda-clearance-for-osteotomy-wedge-system-made-of-peek-optima-ha-enhanced/) (Year: 2020).
Sina, “Application logic of triple periodic minimum surface”, first available Oct. 24, 2020. (https://k.sina.com.cn/article_2422410454_90630cd6001 OOtlbm.html?from=science) (Year: 2020).
3D Adept Media, “Johnson & Johnson Medical”, first available Sep. 17, 2018. (https://3dadept.com/johnson-johnson-medical-has-acquired-3d-printed-spmplants-special ist-emerging-implant-technologies/) (Year: 2018).
Additive Orthopaedics, “Additive Orthopaedics 3d Printed Cotton Bone Segment”, first available Sep. 19, 2020. (https://web.archive.org/web/20200919145251/https:/www.additiveorthopaedics.com/our-products/cotton/) (Year: 2020).
Indiamart, “Anterior Cervical Fusion Cage for Spine Surgery”, first accessed Dec. 9, 2020. (https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/ anterior-cervical-fusion-cage-12402896897 .html) (Year: 2020).
Instagram, “restor3d”, first available Jul. 21, 2020. (https://www.instagram.com/p/CC6dztOAKcM/?utm_source=ig_web_link) (Year: 2020).
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 12, 2021 for European Patent Application No. EP20196410.3.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63413189 Oct 2022 US