Surgical incision and closure apparatus with integrated force distribution

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10123800
  • Patent Number
    10,123,800
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 31, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 13, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
Apparatus for closing a surgical incision comprise a base having left and right panels, a force distribution structure coupled to each panel, and a closure component which releasably attaches to the force distribution structure to draw the inner edges of the panels together in order to close adhered tissue edges. The force distribution structures allow the inner edges of the panels to expand while restraining expansion of the outer edges of the panels and limiting elongation of the lateral dimension of the panels. The incision closure appliance may be placed on skin or other tissue prior to forming the incision to be available to close said incision at the end of the surgical procedure.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to medical apparatus and methods. More particularly, present invention relates to apparatus and methods for forming and closing surgical incisions.


Surgical closure devices including an adhesive based patch with right and left panels are known. Of particular interest of the present invention, such devices are described in co-pending, commonly owned PCT application US 2010/000430, full disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. As described in the PCT application, an adhesive patch is placed over a patient's skin at a site where it is desired to form a surgical incision. After the patch is placed, an incision is formed along an axial line extending through the middle of the patch. After it is formed, the incision can be opened to perform a desired procedure, and after the procedure is completed the incision may be closed by drawing the inner edges of the panels together with a clip, zipper, or other closure member.


The principal objective of such surgical closure devices is to improved healing and reduce scaring from the incision. This objective, however, has been inhibited by certain characteristics of the presently available devices. For example, the tissue edges are not always brought together along an even line, which can increase the eventual scaring. Many such closure devices do not have the ability to adjust the closure force or distance on the tissue edges, limiting the ability to slightly “pucker” tissue which has been found to reduce scaring. Other shortcomings of the available incision and wound closure devices include difficulty of use and inability to conform to tissue manipulation during subsequent surgical protocols, i.e. those devices which are sufficiently rigid to securely close the tissue are often unable to conform to the tissue movement during the surgical procedure.


A particular problem arises with self-adhesive wound closure patches when they're used beneath an adherent surgical incision drape. Such drapes are used to help maintain the sterility of a tissue surface during a surgical procedure, and the drapes may be placed over a previously positioned tissue closure patch. As the surgical incision drape has an adhesive lower surface which adheres to the tissue, the drape will adhere to an upper surface of an underlying tissue closure patch. Removal of the surgical incision drape will thus often remove or at least displace a previously placed tissue closure patch. If any significant portion of the tissue closure patch is removed or displaced, the patch will no longer be useful for closing a surgical wound.


For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide improved surgical incision closure devices and methods for their use. It would be particularly desirable to provide incision closure devices which are able to adhere to the tissue, allow formation of the incision, conform to the deformation of the tissue during a subsequent surgical procedure, and provide controlled closure of the adjacent tissue edges subsequent to the procedure. In particular, it would be desirable if the incision closure devices were able to provide for the control and the uniform distribution of closure forces on the tissue edges while causing minimum restraint or stretching of the tissue during the surgical procedure. It would be still further desirable to provide improved surgical incision closure devices and methods for their use where the devices will resist removal and dislocation when used beneath a surgical incision drape. At least some of these objectives will be met by the inventions described below.


2. Description of the Background Art


Co-pending, commonly owned PCT application US 2010/000430 as been described above. Other surgical closure devices are described in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,012,755; 3,516,409; 3,863,640; 3,933,158; 4,114,624; 3,926,193; 4,535,772; 4,676,245; 4,881,546; 4,905,694; 5,377,695; and 7,455,681; and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2005/0020956 and 2008/0114396. Commercial incision closure devices available from Ethicon, a division of Johnson & Johnson, under the trade name Ethizip™ temporary abdominal wound closure device.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides improved apparatus and methods for closing wounds, particularly wounds resulting from incisions performed during surgical procedures. The incisions would usually be formed in a patient's skin, such as through the abdomen, but in some cases could also be on internal organs, within the oral cavity, within body cavities, or alike.


The devices and methods of the present invention will present minimum disruption of or interference with the surgical procedure which is performed after the incision is made. In particular, the devices and methods will permit the opposed edges of the incised tissue to be opened, stretched, and freely deformed with minimal restraint resulting from the presence of the closure device. Once the procedure has been completed, however, the devices and methods of the present invention will provide for a uniform distribution of closure forces to draw the tissue edges together in a manner which and minimize scaring. In particular, the closure devices can draw the tissue edges together at a slightly closer spacing than initially present at the forming of the incision in order to upwardly evert the tissue edges cause a “pucker” which can reduce scaring.


The devices and methods of the present invention will also be able to avoid or reduce disruption when a incision closure appliance is used beneath surgical incision drape which must be removed from over the closure appliance. A sacrificial layer is provided over at least part of the upper surface of the closure appliance, where the sacrificial cover is held in place while the surgical incision drape is placed over the incision closure appliance. After the incision and surgical procedure have been completed, the surgical incision drape will be pulled from the patient's skin. Instead of adhering to and dislodging the tissue closure appliance, the surgical drape adheres to the sacrificial cover, and only the sacrificial cover is pulled from the patient with the drape, leaving the remainder of the incision closure appliance in place.


In a first aspect of the present invention, an incision closure appliance comprises a base including a left panel and a right panel. Each panel has a tissue adherent lower surface, an upper surface, an inner edge, and an outer edge. The lower tissue adherent surface will typically be coated at least partially with a common tissue-adherent adhesive such as those used in surgical bandages and patches.


The incision closure appliance further includes a force distribution structure coupled to each panel (i.e. each panel will have at least one force distribution structure coupled thereto), where each force distribution structure is adapted to allow axial expansion of the panel along the inner edge while limiting lateral expansion over the entire length and axial expansion along the outer edge. By permitting axial expansion of the panel along the inner edge, the tissue edges are minimally constrained to allow the tissue to deform when stretched during the surgical procedure. Conversely, by limiting both lateral expansion and axial expansion along the outer edge, the panel will be able to apply a controlled and distributed closure force when the panels are drawn together after the surgical procedure is complete, as described in more detail below.


The incision closure appliance still further includes a closure component or assembly which attaches to the force distribution structure to draw the inner edges of the panels together after they had been adhered to the tissue on opposite sides of an incision site and the surgical procedure completed. Each panel of the base will typically comprise an at least partially elastic matrix, typically having an isotropic elasticity (i.e. the panel stretches evenly in all directions) but optionally having an anisotropic elasticity (where the matrix stretches preferentially in one direction or over a portion thereof). The elastic matrix may comprise an elastomeric membrane or sheet (for example Polyurethane sheet or Thermo Plastic Elastomers (TPE)), a woven fabric (typically woven at least partially from elastomeric filaments, threads, or fibers), a spun fabric, or the like. In certain embodiments, the elastomeric matrix may comprise a fabric woven from both elastic elements (typically threads, filaments, fibers, or the like) and having inelastic elements disposed along the outer edge and extending laterally there across in order to provide the expansion characteristics described above with respect to the force distribution structure. That is, in some cases, the force distribution structure may include or consist of inelastic elements woven or otherwise incorporated within a fabric membrane.


Typically, the force distribution structure will comprise a separate component of the incision closure appliance, for example including a spine disposed axially adjacent to the outer edge of the panel and a plurality of axially spaced-apart lateral supports disposed laterally and extending from the spine toward the inner edge of the panel. Such a “comb-like” structure will typically be formed from flexible but non-distensible materials so that the elements can flex together with the tissue deformation but will not stretch along their lengths so that they may provide dimensional stability in the lateral direction as well as along the outer edge of the panel. Examples of such materials include Nylon, Polypropylene, Polyethylene and Polycarbonate or other thermo polymers. Notably, the force distribution structure will not limit the axial stretching of the inner edge of the panel in order to provide the desired expansibility and conforms to the tissue during the surgical procedure. Such separate force distribution structures may be attached to the upper surface of the panel, or alternatively may be embedded in or laminated within the panel. Typically, the force distribution structure will not extend into or past the lower surface of the panel so that it will not interfere with adherence of the panel to the skin or other tissue.


The assembly of the base panels and the force distribution structures will typically be carried on a removable backing which covers and protects the adherent surface of the panels prior to use. The adherent backing may be removed in order to apply the base to the skin or other tissue at the site of the surgical intervention. Additionally, the right and left panels will typically be held together by removable tabs, an axial strip, or other removable covers or structures in order to hold the inner edges of the panel at a pre-determined distance or spacing as they are being adhered to the tissue. For example, removable tabs may be placed at each axial end of the base to temporarily secure the two base panels together. Alternatively, a removable strip or tape may be placed over an axial gap between the right and left panels to hold the panels in place relative to each other as the base is being adhered to the tissue surface. Such tabs or strips will typically be self-adhesive so that they may be secured to the panels and then removed by simply pulling off after the panels are properly placed. The cover, tabs, or strip may then be removed to leave the panels in place but unconnected prior to forming the surgical incision therebetween.


A first exemplary construction of the closure component or assembly comprises a right engagement member, a left engagement member, and a plurality of lateral struts holding the engagement members laterally apart by a pre-determined distance. The right engagement member is adapted to releasably engage the supports of the right panel along an inner edge thereof, and the left engagement member is adapted to releasably engage the supports of the left panel along an inner edge thereof. In the specific embodiments, at least some of the supports of the force distribution component will have cleats near their inner edges, and the engagement members will have slots which receive the cleats. After the surgical intervention is complete, the closure component may then be placed over the force distribution structure with the cleats on one side first being engaged by an engagement member and then the opposite engagement member being pulled over the cleats on the opposite side.


Alternatively, the closure component or assembly may comprise a plurality of independent lateral ties attached to at least some of the lateral supports. Such lateral ties are configured to be secured between the lateral supports, typically being fixed to one panel and being adjustably attachable to the other panel. For the exemplary embodiments, the adjustably attachable end may comprise a ratchet tightening mechanism or similar structure which allows each lateral tie to be independently adjusted at a different spacing between the right and left panels. In this way, the right and left panels may be differentially tensioned along their inner edges in order to control and optimize the forces applied to the adjacent tissue edges which are being drawn together.


Optionally, the closure appliance of the present invention may further comprise a securing layer which is adapted to be placed over the assembly of the base and the closure component after the assembly has been secured over an incision on a patient's skin and the surgical procedure has been completed. A securing layer will typically have a self-adhesive lower surface which can be placed over the assembly of the base and closure component to help secure it in place and to maintain cleanliness. The securing layer may optionally have openings to permit access to the wound for observation, delivery of antiseptics, and the like.


In a further aspect of the present invention, methods for forming an incision in tissue comprise providing an incision closure appliance as described above. The right and left panels of the appliance are adhered to the patient's skin, where the inner edges of the panels are spaced-apart by a pre-selected distance typically from 0.5 mm to 15 mm. An incision (typically linear) is formed in the tissue or skin surface between the inner edges of the panels, and the edges of the incised tissue are then separated to perform a desired surgical procedure. The inner edges of the panels can stretch and conform along with movement and deformation of the tissue edges while the outer edge and lateral extent of each panel remain dimensionally stable. After the procedure is complete, the closure component is secured to the force distribution structure to draw the inner edges of the panels back together. Optionally, the closure component has dimensions (or an adjustable inter-panel spacing) which draw the tissue edges closer together than they were immediately after the incision was formed. Such drawing together of the tissue causes the edges to evert and the tissue to “pucker” which can reduce scarring.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an exploded view of an incision closure appliance constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a top view of the assembly of a base and a force distribution structure which is part of the incision closure appliance.



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 3-3 of FIG. 2.



FIGS. 4-7 illustrate use of the incision closure appliance of the present invention for forming and closing an incision in a patient's skin.



FIG. 8 illustrates an alternative construction of a closure component for the closure appliance of the present invention.



FIG. 9 is an exploded view of a further embodiment of an incision closure appliance constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 10 is an enlarged isometric view of the base and force distribution structure of the system of FIG. 9.



FIGS. 11A and 11B illustrate an alternative lateral tie construction which can be used in the appliances of either FIG. 1 or FIG. 9.



FIG. 12 illustrates a sacrificial cover positioned over an incision closure appliance in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIGS. 13A through 13E illustrate the principle of operation of the sacrificial cover illustrated in FIG. 12 when used together with a surgical incision drape and performing methods according to the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The apparatus and methods of the present invention will be used during both the formation and the closure of surgical incisions made to a patient's skin or other tissue during surgical procedures. As described hereinafter, the direction of the incision will define both “axial” and “lateral” directions as those terms are used herein. Most incisions will be made along a generally straight line which will define the axial direction. The lateral direction will generally be across the axial direction, typically but not necessarily being perpendicular or normal to the axial direction. Most incisions will be generally linear but in some cases the incisions could be curved or have other geometries. The term “axial” will then apply to the direction of the incision at any particular location, resulting in lateral directions which could also vary.


Referring now to FIGS. 1-3, an incision closure appliance 10 comprises a base assembly 12 including a right panel 14 and a left panel 16. A right force distribution structure 18 is secured to the right panel 14, typically by laminating the force distribution structure to an upper surface of the panel, and a left force distribution structure 20 is similarly attached to an upper surface of the left panel 16. The incision closure appliance further comprises a closure component 22 which is removably attachable to the right and left forced distribution structures 18 and 20 in order to close an incision, as described in more detail below, and the appliance is completed with an optional securing layer 24 which may be placed over the combined base assembly 12 and closure component 22 after they have been secured to the patient and the incision has been closed by drawing the panels together using the closure component.


The closure component 22 is intended and adapted to draw the inner portions of the force distribution structures 18 and 20 inwardly toward each other to close a surgical incision which has been formed therebetween. In the illustrated embodiment, a plurality of cleats 26 are formed on lateral supports 36 which are held axially by spine 37 of the force distribution structures 18 and 20. The cleats 26 are received in slots 38 formed along inner edges of opposed engagement members 40 of the closure component 22. The opposed engagement members 40 are held together by lateral struts 42 so that the engagement members are held at a fixed, laterally spaced-apart distance (in other embodiments the spaced-apart distance may be adjustable). The slots 38 are preferably formed on flexible tab-like structures 44 which allow the slots to be pulled upwardly over the corresponding cleats in order to secure the closure component 22 over the force distribution structures 18 and 20.


The lower surfaces 32 of each panel 18 and 20 will typically be covered with a pressure-responsive adhesive, where the adhesive is initially covered with a protective layer 48 which may be peeled away immediately prior to use. Additionally, pull-away tabs 50 or other similar structures may be provided in order to hold the right and left panels 14 and 16 together at a pre-determined spaced-apart distance after the layer 48 has been removed but prior to adhering the panels to a patient's skin or other tissue surface. It is important that the distance between the inner edges 28 of each panel 14 and 16 be maintained as close as possible to the original target spacing so that the tissue edges, when closed by the closure component 22, will be precisely brought together, typically with a slight eversion.


Referring now to FIGS. 4 through 7, a protocol for both forming an incision and subsequently closing the incision in accordance with the principles of the present invention will be described. Initially, the right and left panels 14 and 16 are placed on the patient's skin followed by reference letter S, as shown in FIG. 4. The panels 14 and 16 are applied by first pulling away the protective layer 18 and placing the panels onto the tissue, after which time the tabs 50 may be removed, leaving an incision path 52 defined between the inner edges 28. The spacing of the inner edges 28 will be selected to provide a fixed, pre-determined distance d1.


After the right and left panels 14 and 16 are in place, an incision I can be formed in the space between the panels using a scalpel or other surgical cutting device CD, as shown in FIG. 5.


After the incision I is made, a surgical procedure may be performed by opening the inner edges of the incision which in turn deforms the inner edges 28 of the right and left panels 14 and 16, as shown in FIG. 6. As the inner most ends of the supports 36 are not connected, they are free to separate and allow the elastic matrix of the right and left panels 14 and 16 to expand, as clearly in FIG. 6. The dimensional stability of the remainder of the panels, however, will be preserved by the lateral supports 36 as well as the axial spines 37 which do not elongate under the influence of the force applied by stretching opening the incision.


After the surgical procedure is complete, the closure component 22 will be secured over the force distribution structures 18 and 20, as illustrated in FIG. 7. In particular, the slots 38 in the tab-like structures 44 are engaged over opposed cleats 26 in order to draw opposed edges of the panels as well as of the tissue incision together. By properly spacing the depth of the slots 38, the closure component 22 can be tailored so that the panels 14 and 16 are brought together by a pre-selected distance d2. Typically, the distance d2 will be less than the initial separation d1 so that the inner edges of the tissue are brought together to cause the tissue edges along the incision to slightly evert (pucker upwardly) which can improve healing and reduce scarring.


Optionally, as shown in FIG. 8, a closure component 22′ may include engagement members 40′, where one end of each lateral strut 42′ is joined by an adjustable clasp or other mechanism 54 so that the distance between the inner edges of the opposed engagement members 40′ can be adjusted in order to increase or lessen the distance d2 therebetween.


An alternative embodiment 100 of the incision closure appliance of the present invention is illustrated in FIGS. 9 and 10. The appliance 100 includes a base assembly 102 having a right panel 104 and a left panel 106. A positioning or alignment strip 108 is provided to secure the inner edges of each panel together, as shown best in FIG. 10 and includes an end tab 109 that allows the user to pull the strip from the panels 104 and 106 after the panels have been put in place on a tissue surface.


The incision closure appliance 100 further includes a backing 110 having an end which may be partially folded back to expose an underlying adhesive backing on the panels and allow that end of the base assembly 102 to be adhered to the tissue while the remainder of the base assembly is still covered by the backing. A securing layer 112 which includes a reinforcement frame 113 is provided for placement over the right panel 104 and left panel 106 after the base assembly 102 has been closed over an incision, generally is described in connection with the previous embodiment. Usually, a holding tray 114 will be provided for maintain the components of the appliance together in a sterilized condition where the tray 114 will be covered with conventional medical packaging cover.


As illustrated in FIGS. 9 and 10, a right force distribution structure 116 and a left force distribution structure 118 are provided on the upper surfaces of the right panel 104 and the left panel 106, respectively. The right force distribution structure 116 includes a right axial spine 120 and a plurality of lateral supports 122. Typically, the right axial spine 120 comprises a serpentine or zig-zag number which is embedded in or laminated to a base strip 121. The serpentine axial spine 120 would typically be formed from a flexible, resilient plastic, typically a hard plastic, while the base strip 121 will be comprised of a polyurethane or similar plastic layer. The lower surface of the polyurethane layer will be covered with a hydrocolloid layer for tissue adhesion. The structure of the left forced distribution structure 118 will be the same including a left axial spine 124, left lateral supports 126, and a left base strip 127.


The incision closure appliance 100 will include a closure mechanism comprising a plurality of lateral tie assemblies 128 as shown on FIG. 9. As best seen in FIG. 10, each lateral tie assembly 128 will include a rod which is secured at one end to the left lateral support 126 and a ratchet mechanism 132 which is secured to the right lateral support 122. Each rod 130 will usually be aligned with the axis of the left panel 106 parties so that a gap 129 between the right panel 104 and left panel 106 will be left open so that an incision can be made there between. After the incision is made, each rod 130 will be pulled over to the associated ratchet 132 on the right panel 104. A series of ratchet rings on each rod will be pulled into the associated ratchet mechanism 132, and the rod then pulled laterally until the desired closing tension is applied at that point along the base assembly 102. It is a particular advantage that each of the lateral tie assemblies 128 may be individually adjusted to supply the desired closing tension across the tissue along the length of the incision being closed. Once the desired closing tension has been provided along the entire incision, the securing layer 112 may be placed over base assembly 102 to hold the appliance and tissue in place.


Referring now to FIGS. 11A and 11B, an alternative design for the lateral tie assemblies 140 of the present invention is illustrated. These lateral tie assemblies 140 may be utilized with either of the incision closure appliances 10 or 100 described previously. Each lateral tie assembly 140 includes a right force distribution structure 142 and a left force distribution structure 144. The right force distribution structure includes a right spine 146 and a plurality of lateral supports 148. Although three are shown, it will be appreciated that four, five, six or more lateral supports could be included. The left force distribution structure 144 similarly includes a left spine 150 and a plurality of left lateral supports 152. To provide closure, the right force distribution structure 142 includes a rod 154 which extends from the center lateral support 148. Typically, the rod 154 is joined to the support by a live or passive joint 158. A pull loop 156 is provided at the free end of the rod 154, and a plurality of ratchet teeth 162 are provided along the midsection of the rod 154.


The left force distribution structure 144 includes a ratchet mechanism 160 adapted to receive the teeth 162 on the rod 154 of the right force distribution structure. In this way, the rod 154 can be lowered into the ratchet 160 to engage teeth 162, allowing the rod to be pushed forward in order to draw the right and left force distribution structures 142 and 144 together in order to apply tension to the right and left panels.


As illustrated in FIG. 12, a further aspect of the present invention is illustrated. The incision closure appliance 100 is illustrated schematically with only the right and left panels 104 and 106 and the right and left force distribution structures 116 and 118 being illustrated. The remaining system components are not shown for ease of illustration.


The right panel 104 is covered by a right sacrificial cover 170 and the left panel 106 is covered by a left sacrificial cover 172. Each cover 170 and 172 is detachably secured along each edge of the associated base panel so that the covers remain in place during normal handling and placement of the incision closure appliance 100 over the tissue surface to be incised. The use and purpose of these sacrificial covers 170 and 172 is described with reference to FIGS. 13A and 13E.



FIG. 13A illustrates the right and left panels 104 and 106 in place on a tissue surface T prior to an incision being made. The right panel 104 is covered by right sacrificial cover 170 and the left panel 106 is covered by left sacrificial cover 172. As is common in many surgeries, an adherent surgical incision drape 180 is placed over the tissue surface T. Any conventional drape may be used such as the Ioban™ antimicrobial incise drape, available from 3M, St. Paul, Minn.


After the incision drape 180 is in place over the incision closure appliance, a surgical incision I may be made for performing a desired surgical intervention. As can be seen, the incision I will cut through the surgical drape 180 between the right and left panels 104 and 106, respectively. After the surgical procedure is completed, the surgical drape 180 will be removed from the tissue surface T. As the surgical drape has a lower adherent surface, prior to the present invention, removal of the drape might have displaced either or both of the right panel 104 and left panel 106. Presence of the sacrificial layers 170m and 172, however, prevents such displacement. Removal of the surgical drape 180 will remove the sacrificial layer 170 and 172, but as each of these layers is configured to break off with a relatively low separation force, removal of the sacrificial layers will not cause the underlying panels 104 or 106 to be displaced. Thus, the panels 104 and 106 will be left in place, as shown in FIG. 13D, and the force distribution structures 116 and 118 can be used as described previously for closing the panels together to close the incision as shown in FIG. 13E.

Claims
  • 1. An incision closure appliance comprising: a base including a left panel and a right panel, each panel having a tissue adherent lower surface, an upper surface, a longitudinal axis, an inner edge, and an outer edge;left and right force distribution structures coupled to the left and right panels, respectively, wherein each force distribution structure comprises an axial spine disposed substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the left or right panel and a plurality of lateral supports extending laterally from the axial spine and disposed substantially perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the left or right panel, wherein the axial spine and the plurality of lateral supports are integral with one another, wherein the lateral supports are axially separate and spaced apart from one another, wherein the force distribution structures are configured to allow the inner edges of the panels to expand while restraining expansion of the outer edges of the panels, and wherein the axial spine and lateral supports are configured to preserve dimensional stability of the panels when the panels are deformed; anda closure assembly securable to the left and right panels to draw the inner edges of the panels together, wherein the closure assembly comprises one or more lateral ties, each lateral tie having a fixed end fixedly coupled to one of the left or right force distribution structures and a free end opposite the fixed end, the free end being adjustably coupled to the opposing left or right force distribution structure.
  • 2. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein each panel of the base comprises an elastic matrix.
  • 3. An incision closure appliance as in claim 2, wherein the elastic matrix comprises an elastomeric membrane, a woven fabric, or a spun fabric.
  • 4. An incision closure appliance as in claim 2, wherein the elastic matrix comprises a fabric woven from elastic elements and having inelastic elements along the outer edge and extending laterally thereacross.
  • 5. An incision closure appliance as in claim 2, wherein the elastic matrix is isotropic.
  • 6. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein the axial spine of each force distribution structure is disposed axially adjacent to the outer edge of the panel, and wherein the plurality of lateral supports are axially spaced-apart and extend laterally from the axial spine toward the inner edge of the panel.
  • 7. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein the axial spine and lateral supports are formed from flexible, non-distensible materials.
  • 8. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, further comprising a removable space maintainer which holds the right and left panels at a fixed distance while they are being adhered to tissue.
  • 9. An incision closure appliance as in claim 8, wherein the removable space maintainer comprises a strip which is removably placed over an axial gap between the right and left panels.
  • 10. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein the fixed end of each lateral tie is fixedly coupled to the axial spine of the one of the left or right force distribution structures.
  • 11. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein the free end of each lateral tie is adjustably coupled to the opposing left or right force distribution structure with an adjustable ratchet tightening mechanism.
  • 12. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, further comprising a securing layer adapted to be placed over an assembly of the base and the closure assembly after the assembly has been secured over an incision on a patient's skin.
  • 13. An incision closure appliance as in claim 12, wherein the securing layer has an inner self-adhesive surface.
  • 14. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein the fixed end is integral with the one of the left or right force distribution structures.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/286,757, filed Nov. 1, 2011, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (190)
Number Name Date Kind
2012755 Muth Aug 1935 A
2371978 Perham Mar 1945 A
2747248 Mercer May 1956 A
3118201 Beghetto, Jr. Jan 1964 A
3487836 Niebel et al. Jan 1970 A
3516409 Howell Jun 1970 A
3698395 Hasson Oct 1972 A
3863640 Haverstock Feb 1975 A
3926193 Hasson Dec 1975 A
3933158 Haverstock Jan 1976 A
3971384 Hasson Jul 1976 A
3972328 Chen Aug 1976 A
3983878 Kawchitch Oct 1976 A
4038989 Romero-Sierra et al. Aug 1977 A
4114624 Haverstock Sep 1978 A
4210148 Stivala Jul 1980 A
4222383 Schossow Sep 1980 A
4224945 Cohen Sep 1980 A
4526173 Sheehan Jul 1985 A
4531521 Haverstock Jul 1985 A
4535772 Sheehan Aug 1985 A
4539990 Stivala Sep 1985 A
4576163 Bliss Mar 1986 A
4605005 Sheehan Aug 1986 A
4612230 Liland et al. Sep 1986 A
4676245 Fukuda Jun 1987 A
4702251 Sheehan Oct 1987 A
4780168 Beisang et al. Oct 1988 A
4871367 Christensen et al. Oct 1989 A
4881546 Kaessmann Nov 1989 A
4905694 Will Mar 1990 A
4950282 Beisang et al. Aug 1990 A
4966605 Thieler Oct 1990 A
4976726 Haverstock Dec 1990 A
5176703 Peterson Jan 1993 A
5190032 Zacoi Mar 1993 A
5259835 Clark et al. Nov 1993 A
5306236 Blumenfeld et al. Apr 1994 A
5336219 Krantz Aug 1994 A
5377695 An Haack Jan 1995 A
5514155 Daneshvar May 1996 A
5533519 Radke et al. Jul 1996 A
5562705 Whiteford Oct 1996 A
5665108 Galindo Sep 1997 A
5725507 Petrick Mar 1998 A
5788660 Resnik Aug 1998 A
5823983 Rosofsky et al. Oct 1998 A
5843123 Brazeau Dec 1998 A
6007564 Haverstock Dec 1999 A
6033654 Stedronsky et al. Mar 2000 A
6074965 Bodenschatz Jun 2000 A
6126615 Allen et al. Oct 2000 A
6176868 Detour Jan 2001 B1
6194629 Bernhard Feb 2001 B1
6689100 Connelly et al. Feb 2004 B2
6726706 Dominguez Apr 2004 B2
7066182 Dunshee Jun 2006 B1
7361185 O'Malley et al. Apr 2008 B2
7455681 Wilke Nov 2008 B2
7511185 Lebner Mar 2009 B2
7641682 Palmaz et al. Jan 2010 B2
7645285 Cosgrove et al. Jan 2010 B2
7799042 Williamson et al. Sep 2010 B2
8246590 Hu et al. Aug 2012 B2
8313508 Belson et al. Nov 2012 B2
8323313 Belson Dec 2012 B1
8439945 Belson et al. May 2013 B2
8592640 Zepeda et al. Nov 2013 B2
8663275 O'Malley et al. Mar 2014 B2
9008784 Chan et al. Apr 2015 B2
9050086 Belson et al. Jun 2015 B2
9089328 Belson Jul 2015 B2
9179914 Belson et al. Nov 2015 B2
9271858 Ben-Meir et al. Mar 2016 B2
9474529 Belson et al. Oct 2016 B2
9554799 Belson et al. Jan 2017 B2
9554800 Belson et al. Jan 2017 B2
9561034 Belson et al. Feb 2017 B2
9642621 Belson et al. May 2017 B2
9642622 Belson May 2017 B2
20020099315 Lebner Jul 2002 A1
20030065294 Pickup et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030108352 Hellman Jun 2003 A1
20030120198 Barkell et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030163160 O'Malley et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030220596 Dunshee Nov 2003 A1
20040072964 Udding et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040106904 Gonnelli et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040204740 Weiser Oct 2004 A1
20040210176 Diana Oct 2004 A1
20040260234 Srinivasan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050020956 Lebner Jan 2005 A1
20050020957 Lebner Jan 2005 A1
20050070956 Rousseau Mar 2005 A1
20050080453 Lebner et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050085757 Santanello Apr 2005 A1
20050153090 Marchitto et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050234485 Seegert et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050277959 Cosgrove et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050284801 Tacklind Dec 2005 A1
20060030886 Clark Feb 2006 A1
20060122522 Chavan et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060200198 Riskin et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060259033 Nesbitt Nov 2006 A1
20070026078 Almarsson et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038247 Lebner et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070078366 Haggstrom et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088339 Luchetti Apr 2007 A1
20070106277 Hood et al. May 2007 A1
20070141130 Villaneuva et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070179419 Simpson Aug 2007 A1
20070185432 Etheredge Aug 2007 A1
20070260278 Wheeler et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080033334 Gurtner et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080069855 Bonutti Mar 2008 A1
20080081951 Frasier et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103550 Wenzel et al. May 2008 A1
20080114396 Cory May 2008 A1
20080147115 O'Malley et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161731 Woods et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080228219 Weiser Sep 2008 A1
20080287864 Rosenberg Nov 2008 A1
20090036922 Riskin et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090062531 Kanda Mar 2009 A1
20090099496 Heegard et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090149869 Lhun Jun 2009 A1
20090158131 Choi et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090162531 Nesbitt Jun 2009 A1
20090177225 Nunez et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090264709 Blurton et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090299255 Kazala et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090299257 Long et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090299303 Seegert Dec 2009 A1
20100100022 Greener Apr 2010 A1
20100121286 Locke et al. May 2010 A1
20100228287 Jeekel et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100280545 Fridman Nov 2010 A1
20110077667 Singhatat et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110106026 Wu et al. May 2011 A1
20110144470 Mazar et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120016410 Belson et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029266 Holmes et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120095502 Bargon et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120116279 Munro et al. May 2012 A1
20120116485 Burgmann May 2012 A1
20120203273 Riskin et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221044 Archibald et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120226214 Gurtner Sep 2012 A1
20120232587 Burke et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130072969 Zhang Mar 2013 A1
20130108352 Ruiz, Sr. et al. May 2013 A1
20130178897 Wu et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130281885 Rowbottom et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130281981 Shamir Oct 2013 A1
20130282049 Peterson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130331757 Belson Dec 2013 A1
20140074156 Belson et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140171849 Fischell et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140222070 Belson et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140228712 Elliott et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140278229 Hong et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140316323 Kanevsky et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150045700 Cavanagh et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150105423 Haudenschild et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150148653 Fleig et al. May 2015 A1
20150209563 Amir Jul 2015 A1
20150216527 Belson et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150309535 Connor et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150313593 Patenaude et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150351690 Toth et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160007909 Singh et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160095597 Belson et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160106931 Belson et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160114146 Belson et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160202755 Connor Jul 2016 A1
20160206311 Belson et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160206312 Belson et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160206313 Belson et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160213924 Coleman et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160220175 Tam et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160220252 Belson et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160242646 Obma Aug 2016 A1
20160249924 Belson et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160296149 Polsky et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160302721 Wiedenhoefer et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160310140 Belson et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170035422 Belson et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170042541 Belson et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170143341 Belson et al. May 2017 A1
20170156664 Belson et al. Jun 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (46)
Number Date Country
1126430 Jul 1996 CN
1442119 Sep 2003 CN
1524507 Sep 2004 CN
1234327 Jan 2006 CN
1234327 Jan 2006 CN
101938944 Jan 2011 CN
202537562 Nov 2012 CN
202537562 Nov 2012 CN
102946812 Feb 2013 CN
104755033 Jul 2015 CN
104825200 Aug 2015 CN
1600108 Nov 2005 EP
1401877 Aug 1975 GB
S5094788 Jul 1975 JP
S62243557 Oct 1987 JP
H07502913 Mar 1995 JP
2001-149485 Jun 2001 JP
2005512678 May 2005 JP
2005532134 Oct 2005 JP
2010504835 Feb 2010 JP
2013515417 May 2013 JP
2013538603 Oct 2013 JP
WO-8401805 May 1984 WO
WO 9629013 Sep 1996 WO
WO-03053296 Jul 2003 WO
WO 2006124671 Nov 2006 WO
WO-2007004603 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007044647 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2008019051 Feb 2008 WO
WO 2008060532 May 2008 WO
WO-2009066116 May 2009 WO
WO 2011019859 Feb 2011 WO
WO 2011019859 Apr 2011 WO
WO 2011043786 Apr 2011 WO
WO 2011139912 Nov 2011 WO
WO 2011159623 Dec 2011 WO
WO 2013067024 May 2013 WO
WO-2014066879 May 2014 WO
WO-2014070922 May 2014 WO
WO-2015012887 Jan 2015 WO
WO-2015103556 Jul 2015 WO
WO-2015168165 Nov 2015 WO
WO-2017027075 Feb 2017 WO
WO-2017044120 Mar 2017 WO
WO-2017181059 Oct 2017 WO
WO-2017184825 Oct 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (95)
Entry
dictionary.com definition of “fixed”, accessed on Sep. 13, 2017, http://www.dictionary.com/browse/fixed.
Merriam-webster definition of “integral”, accessed on Sep. 13, 2017, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/integral.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/874,046, filed Apr. 30, 2013, Belson et al.
International search report and written opinion dated Mar. 19, 2013 for PCT/US2012/062820.
European search report and opinion dated Apr. 29, 2015 for EP Application No. 10822334.8.
International search report and written opinion dated Apr. 29, 2015 for PCT/US2015/010188.
Office action dated Apr. 7, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909.
Office action dated Jun. 5, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/874,046.
Office action dated Jun. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,176.
Office action dated Aug. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,564.
European search report and written opinion dated Aug. 12, 2015 for EP Application No. 12844746.3.
Notice of allowance dated Sep. 22, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,176.
Hasson, et al. A new sutureless technique for skin closure. Arch Surg. Jan. 1976;111(1):83-4.
International search report and written opinion dated Sep. 10, 2014 for PCT/US2014/016587.
Office action dated Aug. 28, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,524.
Office action dated Sep. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/851,059, filed Sep. 11, 2015.
International search report and written opinion dated Sep. 30, 2015 for PCT Application No. US2015/28066.
Notice of allowance dated Dec. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,564.
Office action dated Dec. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,176, filed Mar. 7, 2012, Belson et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909, filed Nov. 27, 2012, Belson.
International search report dated Jul. 30, 2010 for PCT/US2010/000430.
International search report and written opinion dated Jul. 29, 2011 for PCT/US2011/034649.
International search report and written opinion dated Oct. 21, 2011 for PCT Application No. US11/40213.
Office action dated Mar. 21, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,378.
Office action dated Mar. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,757.
Office action dated May 2, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/096,602.
Office action dated Jul. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,378.
Office action dated Jul. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,757.
Office action dated Nov. 19, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/096,602.
Notice of allowance dated Jan. 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/096,602.
Notice of allowance dated Sep. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,378.
Notice of allowance dated Sep. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,757.
Office action dated Mar. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,176.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/625,366, filed Feb. 18, 2015, Belson et al.
Office action dated Feb. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,176.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,524, filed Feb. 14, 2014, Belson et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,564, filed Feb. 14, 2014, Belson et al.
European search report and opinion dated Jan. 7, 2014 for EP Application No. 11796253.0.
European search report and opinion dated Jan. 7, 2014 for EP Application No. 11778067.6.
International search report and written opinion dated Feb. 6, 2014 for PCT/US2013/067563.
Notice of allowance dated Feb. 10, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,524.
Office action dated Oct. 14, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,803, filed Dec. 3, 2015.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,818, filed Dec. 3, 2015.
International search report and written opinion dated Jan. 12, 2016 for PCT Application No. US2015/049671.
K984204, 510(k) Premarket Notification Summary, Silverlon™ Direct Pressure Wound Closure Strip, May 19, 2007.
Office action dated Mar. 4, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/874,046.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,526, filed Mar. 25, 2016.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,550, filed Mar. 25, 2016.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,595, filed Mar. 25, 2016.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,149, filed Apr. 15, 2016.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/096,083, filed Apr. 11, 2016.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,764, filed Apr. 15, 2016.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Definition of “lateral”. Http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lateral. Accessed on May 5, 2016.
Notice of allowance dated Jun. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,526.
Office action dated May 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,595.
Office action dated May 12, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,550.
Office action dated May 26, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,526.
Office action dated May 31, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/096,083.
Office action dated Jun. 17, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,149.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/337,768, filed Oct. 28, 2016.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/369,293, filed Dec. 5, 2016.
European search report and opinion dated Jul. 12, 2016 for EP Application No. 13851258.
International search report and written opinion dated Aug. 30, 2016 for PCT/US2016/028297.
Notice of allowance dated Feb. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,595.
Notice of allowance dated Sep. 30, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,149.
Notice of allowance dated Oct. 5, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/096,083.
Notice of allowance dated Oct. 14, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,550.
Notice of allowance dated Dec. 19, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,149.
Office action dated Jul. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,764.
Office action dated Nov. 17, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,595.
Zip® Surgical Skin Closure. Fast, non-invasive alternative to staples, sutures and glue. Accessed Aug. 17, 2016. http://www.ziplinemedical.com/products/zip-surgical-skin-closure/.
European search report and opinion dated Feb. 17, 2017 for EP Application No. 140829202.
European search report with written opinion dated Jul. 12, 2016 for EP13851258.
International search report with written opinion dated Jul. 14, 2017 for PCT/US2017/027695.
International search report with written opinion dated Jul. 18, 2017 for PCT/US2017/028537.
International search report with written opinion dated Aug. 30, 2016 for PCT/US2016/028297.
Notice of allowance dated Feb. 21, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/625,366.
Office action dated Feb. 1, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,764.
Office action dated Jun. 1, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,382.
Office action dated Jul. 27, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/851,059.
PCT/US2017/059286 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 6, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/851,059 Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2018.
Extended European search report and opinion dated Jul. 27, 2017 for EP Application No. 15733186.
Office action dated Aug. 24, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,803.
Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909.
Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,818.
Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,764.
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,382.
“Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 20, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,764.”.
“Office action dated Jun. 6, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,088.”.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,803 Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 4, 2018”.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,803 Notice of Allowance dated May 11, 2018.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130296930 A1 Nov 2013 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13286757 Nov 2011 US
Child 13665160 US