The present invention relates to a surgical instrument and methods of use, and in particular to a surgical instrument for, and methods of use in, arthroplasty procedures carried out on the knee joint.
A variety of knee arthroplasty procedures are known. Many involve the use or orthopedic implants including partial knee procedures, in which only some of the distal part of the femur or proximal part of the tibia are replaced, or total knee procedures in which both the distal part of the femur and the proximal part of the tibia are replaced.
Knee arthroplasty surgical procedures often also involve the soft tissues of the knee joint such as the tendons and ligaments. One example is ligament balancing in which the ligaments around the knee joint are adjusted, often by cutting the individual strands of ligaments themselves and/or releasing their attachments points from the bone, in order to balance the forces exerted by the implant components on each other, or on remaining bone, when the knee joint has been partially or wholly replaced. The balance of the knee joint can be investigated with the leg in flexion and extension to see how the ligaments and knee joint interact over the full likely range of motion of the knee joint.
Ligament balancing is not easy to achieve and outcomes can depend on the skill, judgment and experience of the surgeon. Also, ligament balancing is not entirely reproducible and outcomes can vary depending on the specific anatomy or condition of any patient's joint.
Hence, a successful knee arthroplasty procedure can be dependent on the combination of balance and alignment of the prostheses.
It would therefore be beneficial to provide an instrument and/or surgical methods which can improve the reliability of assessment of ligament balance during a knee arthroplasty procedure and/or the making of cuts or re-cuts to the tibia or femur.
A first aspect of the invention provides an adjustable spacer instrument for use in a knee arthroplasty procedure, comprising: a first member having a substantially planar upper surface; a second member having a substantially planar lower surface; and an angular adjustment mechanism interposed between the first member and the second member, the angular adjustment mechanism being operable to adjust the degree of tilt between the upper surface and the lower surface.
Hence, the spacer instrument can be used to tilt the femur and tibia relative to each other so as to allow the surgeon to assess the balance of the ligaments of the joint and make any adjustments or modifications to the knee arthroplasty procedure.
The angular adjustment mechanism can include a plurality of first formations and a plurality of second formations. The first formations and second formations can have different heights or depths. The first and/or second formations can be repositioned to allow different ones of the first and second formations to interact to cause the first member and second member to change their angular orientation.
The angular adjustment mechanism can be configured to allow the first member and/or second member to pivot about an axis parallel to a plane of the first member or second member. The axis can extend in a generally anterior-posterior direction of the instrument in use.
The angular adjustment mechanism can be configured substantially to maintain the height of the spacer instrument at its center or along a central axis. Hence, operation of the spacer instrument substantially affects only the degree of tilt of the knee joint and not the degree of separation of the bones or size of the joint gap during surgery.
Preferably, the angular adjustment mechanism includes a releasable lock which can maintain the degree of tilt. Hence, one the degree of inclination has been set by the instrument it is maintained and so the surgeon is free to release the instrument and carry out other acts. The releasable lock can be provided as an integral part of the angular adjustment mechanism. The releasable lock can be provided as a distinct or separate mechanism to the angular adjustment mechanism, and which may be an analogue or continuous adjustment mechanism
The degree of tilt in two different directions or senses can be adjusted. The direction of tilt can be in the medial direction or the lateral direction.
The angular adjustment mechanism can be operable to continuously adjust the degree of tilt.
The adjustment mechanism can be operable to discretely adjust the degree of tilt. A plurality of different magnitudes of degree of tilt can be provided and/or in two different senses or directions.
The adjustment mechanism can be configured to tilt the upper surface and/or the lower surface about an axis extending in a generally anterior-posterior direction in use.
The adjustment mechanism can comprise entirely integral parts of the first member and/or the second member which interact when the adjustment mechanism is operated. This provides for a compact instrument with a reduced height compared to having the adjustment mechanism made from parts separate to the first and/or second members.
The adjustment mechanism can be provided as a separate or non-integral part of the first and second member. The adjustment mechanism may be operable or configured to adjust the angle without rotating the first and or second part. The adjustment mechanism may be operable or configured to adjust the angle by rotating the whole or a part of the adjustment mechanism relative to both the first and second part. Hence, the first and second members do not need to rotate as the angle they subtend is adjusted.
The adjustment mechanism can be operable by rotating the first member or the second member. The first member can be rotatable relative to the second member or the second member rotatable relative to the first member or the first and second members rotatable relative to each other.
The first member and/or the second member can be rotatable about an axis substantially perpendicular to a plane of the adjustable spacer instrument. The plane can be parallel to the upper or lower surface.
A posterior part of the first member and/or a posterior part of the second member can include a recess configured to accept the posterior cruciate ligament in use. Hence, the posterior cruciate ligament will not be impinged by the instrument in use.
The adjustable spacer instrument can consist of only two parts. This provides improved simplicity of manufacture and compactness of the instrument, particularly its height or thickness. The or each part may be molded or machined. The or each part may be made of a plastics material or a metal. The instrument can be re-useable or disposable.
The adjustment mechanism can comprise a plurality of proud features and a plurality of regions of differing height or depth positioned to engage the proud features in a plurality of different configurations each corresponding to a different degree of tilt between the upper surface and the lower surface. The proud features can be disposed on a lower surface of the first member and the regions of differing height or depth can be disposed on an upper surface of the second member, or vice versa. The proud features and regions or differing height or depth can be arranged in a generally circular pattern or with generally circular rotational symmetry. Preferably at least three proud features and at least three associated or interacting regions of differing height or depth are provided. Three proud features and three interacting regions are the minimal requirement for providing a stable surface in this preferred form of the adjustment mechanism.
The plurality of regions of differing height are in the form of recessed tracks into which the plurality of proud features respectively engage. The recessed tracks can provide races within which the proud features can be constrained to travel.
Each recessed track can include a base. The base can provide a continuous camming surface.
Each recessed track can be in the form of a plurality of detents. Each detent of each track can have a depth arranged to provide a different degree of tilt by magnitude or direction.
The adjustable spacer instrument can further comprise an attachment formation to which a cutting block can be releasably attached. The attachment formation can be a part of the first member or the second member. The attachment formation can be a recess for receiving an attachment formation attached to a cutting block.
The adjustable spacer instrument can have an initial state in which the upper surface and lower surface are parallel and a plurality of tilted states in which the upper surface and lower surface are non-parallel. The adjustable spacer instrument can be driveable between the initial state and the plurality of tilted states by operating the angular adjustment mechanism.
The thickness of the adjustable spacer instrument, when the upper and lower surfaces are parallel can be not greater than 10 mm, and preferably is not greater than 8 mm, and most preferably not greater than 6 mm. The thickness of the spacer instrument can be in the range of approximately 4 mm to 8 mm, preferably about 6 mm. These values provide an instrument particularly suited for use in a joint gap after the tibial or femoral cut has been made, but before the other bone cut has been made.
The thickness of the adjustable spacer instrument, when the upper and lower surfaces are parallel can be not greater than 19 mm, and preferably is not greater than 17 mm, and most preferably not greater than 15 mm. The thickness of the spacer instrument can be in the range of approximately 13 mm to 17 mm, preferably about 15 mm. These values provide an instrument particularly suited for use in a joint gap after the femoral and tibial cuts have been made.
A second aspect of the invention provides a kit of parts, comprising the adjustable spacer instrument of the first aspect of the invention and a cutting block. The cutting block can include a mount with an attachment formation by which the cutting block can be releasably attached to the adjustable spacer instrument. The cutting block can include a cutting guide, the cutting guide being positioned in the cutting block or the cutting block and/or mount being configured so that the cutting guide is parallel to the upper surface or the lower surface of the adjustable spacer instrument.
Hence, the kit of parts can be used to make cuts or re-cuts to the tibia or femur with reference to the upper surface or lower surface of the spacer instrument. This allows parallel resected surfaces of the femur and tibia to be more easily and reliably produced with the knee joint balanced or so as to balance the knee joint.
The mount can be a separate part to the cutting block. The mount can includes an attachment mechanism by which the mount can be releasably attachable to the cutting block. Hence, a conventional cutting block can be used and the mount can be adapted to allow the conventional cutting block to be attached to the spacer instrument.
The mount can be an integral part of the cutting block.
The cutting block can be a femoral cutting block or a tibial cutting block. The femoral cutting block can be for making a distal femoral cut or for making an anterior and/or posterior femoral cut. The tibial cutting block can be for making the proximal tibial cut.
The mount can be adjustable to vary the separation between the cutting guide and the spacer instrument. Hence, the size of the gap between the resected femur and resected tibia can be adjusted. The gap can be a gap in flexion or extension.
A further aspect of the invention provides various methods of carrying out a knee arthroplasty procedure.
The method can comprise resecting the proximal part of the tibia or the distal part of the femur to produce a substantially flat bone surface. An adjustable spacer instrument having an upper surface and a lower surface can be placed on the flat bone surface in a gap between the tibia and the femur. The adjustable spacer instrument can be adjusted vary the degree of tilt between the upper surface and the lower surface. The balance of ligaments of the knee can be assessed.
The adjustable spacer can be locked to maintain the degree of tilt.
Assessment can be carried out by a surgeon or by using a further instrument, such as a pressure or tension sensor or detector.
The method can further comprise attaching a cutting block having a cutting guide to the adjustable spacer instrument. The cutting block can be attached after the joint has been balanced. The cutting guide can be parallel to the upper or lower surface of the adjustable spacer. The cutting guide can be used to resect at least part of the proximal part of the tibia or the distal part of the femur not already resected. Hence, the tibial and femoral cuts can be made parallel with the knee in balance.
Both the proximal part of the tibia and the distal part of the femur can be resected to produce substantially flat bone surfaces. The method can further comprise attaching a cutting block having a cutting guide to the adjustable spacer instrument, wherein the cutting guide is parallel to the upper or lower surface of the adjustable spacer. The cutting guide can be used to re-cut the already resected proximal part of the tibia or the distal part of femur. Hence, previously made cuts can be corrected to make them more parallel when the knee is balanced.
The method can be carried out with the knee in extension or in flexion.
With the knee in flexion, the proximal part of the tibia can have been resected and operating the adjustable spacer instrument can rotate the femur relative to the tibia.
The method can further comprise attaching a cutting block having a cutting guide to the adjustable spacer instrument, wherein the cutting guide is parallel to the lower surface of the adjustable spacer. The cutting guide can be used to resect an anterior part and/or a posterior part of the femur. Hence, the cuts defining the gap in flexion can more reliably be made parallel with the knee in balance.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described in detail, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Similar items in different Figures share common reference numerals unless indicated otherwise.
With reference to
The spacer instrument 100 includes a first top member 102 and a second lower member 104. The top and bottom members each have a generally plate-like form and have a shape similar to that of the proximal part of a tibia. The top plate 102 and bottom plate 104 each generally have a first and second lobe disposed either side of, and defining, a recessed or cutaway portion 106, 108 in a posterior end of the spacer 100. The recess 106, 108 is shaped and configured to accept the posterior cruciate ligament in use and to prevent impingement therewith. The top plate 102 has a substantially flat planar upper surface 110 and a lower surface 112. The bottom plate similarly has a substantially flat planar lower surface 114 and an upper surface 116.
The top plate 102 has a centrally positioned circular boss 120 extending from its lower surface 112. Three dome-tipped pegs 122, 124, 126 also extend from the lower surface 112 and are disposed in a generally equilateral manner about central boss 120. Each of pegs 122, 124, 126 has the same height, that is extends by the same distance from the lower surface 112. Pegs 122, 124, 126 provide a part of the angular adjustment mechanism of the adjustable spacer.
A circular aperture 130 is located from the center of the lower plate 104. Aperture 130 is dimensioned to accept boss 120 therein. First, second and third recessed tracks 132, 134, 136 are disposed in arcs concentric to central aperture 130. Each track 132, 134, 136 is provided in the form of a plurality of detents. In the illustrated embodiment, there are eleven distinct detents in each track.
Each detent in a track has a different depth, while corresponding detents in the different tracks have the same depth. The middle detent, e.g. detent 138, corresponds to a zero degree of tilt between the upper surface 110 and lower surface 114 of the top and bottom members as illustrated in
When assembled, as illustrated in
Further, the use of detents and round headed pegs provides a releasable locking mechanism by which the base of instrument 100 can have a degree of tilt of the upper surface 110 and lower surface 114 fixed. The detents prevent the pegs from easily moving into an adjoining detent when the spacer instrument is under compression in use. Therefore, there is a threshold rotation force which must be applied to the top plate in order to rotate the top plate relative to the bottom plate so as to adjust the degree of tilt of the upper and lower surfaces.
Further, the discrete detents allow the adjustment mechanism to have discrete, or non-continuous, adjustment of the degree of tilt.
Furthermore, the detents do not need to provide a smooth transition and therefore can be arranged to provide whatever magnitude or sense of angle might be useful, and also whatever sequence of angles might be useful in the spacer instrument. Each group of three detents can affect a completely different angle change. For example, the detents could be configured to provide angles of +/−1°, +/−2°, +/−3°, +/−6°, +/−9° and +/−30°.
In alternative embodiments, the detents can be replaced by a smooth base surface of the trough providing a continuous camming surface while in continuous adjustment of the degree of tilt. However, in such embodiments, a separate locking mechanism would need to be provided in order to releasably lock the degree of tilt. Further, the camming surface would need to provide a gradual change in angle and may not be able to accommodate as large tilt angle changes as the use of discrete detents.
The combination of angles provided by the detents can of course be varied to provide the magnitude and range of angles required for any particular application.
In an alternate embodiment of the adjustment mechanism, a part of the adjustment mechanism can be provided wholly separately from the firs and second members. A separate rotatable angle adjustment part providing either detents on both its upper and lower surfaces or protrusion on both surfaces, is sandwiched between the co-operating features (i.e. protrusions or detents) on the upper and lower surfaces of the members. Hence, this rotatable angle adjustment part can be rotated to adjust the angle between the members while the members themselves do not rotate, but merely tilt.
The diameter of boss 120 and circular aperture 130 are selected so as to allow the top plate 102 to pivot relative to the bottom plate 104. Boss 120 allows the top plate to be rotated relative to the bottom plate about an axis essentially perpendicular to the plane of the bottom plate and also helps to prevent pegs 122, 124, 126 escaping from their respective tracks 132, 134, 136, during operation of the spacer instrument.
Additionally or alternatively, in other embodiments, the upper surface 110 or lower surface 114 can include formations for allowing shim components to be attached to the lower surface 114 or upper surface 110 so as to increase the overall thickness of the instrument during use. Preferably, the formations allow releasable attachment of the shim or shims so as to allow the thickness of the spacer instrument 100 to be adjusted, depending on the size of the gap in the patient's knee between the femur and tibia or the amount of distraction desired between the patient's femur and tibia.
As illustrated in
Further, by providing the components of the angular adjustment mechanism as integral parts of the top and bottom plates, rather than separate parts, the overall thickness of the instrument can be reduced. The gap between the un-cut femur and resected tibia of a typical knee is of order 10 mm and so there is particularly little space in which to insert the instrument in use and so the instrument needs to be of low thickness. Similarly, the gap between the resected femur and un-cut tibia is of order 10 mm and so a low thickness instrument is required for such surgical approaches.
The spacer instrument is easy and versatile to use intra-operatively. The same instrument allows for re-cuts to correct imbalance of the knee and also allows for initial setting of the distal cut angle, femur rotation, extension gap and flexing gap depending on the surgical procedure adopted.
Having described construction and operation of the spacer instrument 100, a variety of surgical procedures in which it can be used will now be described. Broadly speaking, the spacer instrument has two main modes of use. A first mode of use is pre-final cut with the knee joint either in flexion or extension. The second main mode of use is post-final cut to allow fine tuning of the knee, in flexion or extension, in order to optimize balance of the knee. The instrument is designed to compliment ligament release techniques, or to eliminate the need for them, by altering the bone cuts instead to compliment the patient's current or existing ligaments. Hence, the instrument allows a surgical approach based on altering the bone cuts which is believed to be easier than selectively cutting ligament fibers.
Various methods of use of the spacer instrument with the patient's leg in extension, will now be described with reference to
If, following assessment of the ligaments, the surgeon determines that with these initial cuts, the knee is not sufficiently balanced, then two courses of action are available.
The surgeon can release the knee ligaments, by making cuts to the fibers of the ligaments, or to the positions at which the ligaments are attached to the bone, until the surgeon considers the knee to be balanced.
Alternatively, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
The mount 164 can include an adjustment mechanism allowing the height of the cutting block 160 to be adjusted so as to allow the gap between the femoral cut and tibial cut to be adjusted. Also, a scale can be provided on the mount 164 so as to display a measure of the gap depending on the depth of femoral cut made.
In a further embodiment of a method of use of the spacer instrument, also with the knee joint in extension, the spacer instrument 100 can be used prior to the distal femoral cut being made, so as to set the angle of the knee and depth of the distal cut. Initially, only the proximal tibial cut is made, then the spacer instrument is introduced into the joint space in its parallel configuration with the condyles of the femur engaging the upper surface of the top plate 102. Any shims can be added if needed in order to place the joint in tension. The surgeon can then assess the balance of the ligaments and operate the spacer instrument 100 in order to tilt the upper surface relative to the lower surface so as to determine the angle of the knee joint providing better ligament balance. Then, with the knee joint angle set, the distal cutting block 160 is attached to the tibial plate 104 of the instrument, similarly to as illustrated in
In a further alternative embodiment with the knee joint in extension, a similar approach can be used to that described immediately above, but in which only the distal femoral cut is made initially and then the proximal tibial cut is made with reference to the upper surface of the top plate 102, by attaching a tibial cutting block via a mount attached to the top plate 102. Hence again, the resected tibial and femoral surfaces can be provided generally parallel to each other with the ligaments in balance.
Methods of use of the spacer instrument 100 with the knee joint in flexion according to embodiments of the invention will now also be described. With reference to
Initially, the proximal tibial cut is made to remove the proximal portion of the tibia, as illustrated by dashed line 180 and resulting in a substantially flat resected proximal tibial surface 182. The spacer instrument 100 is inserted into the joint gap in its parallel configuration with the lower surface of the bottom plate 104 resting on the resected tibial surface 182. The upper surface of the top plate 102 rests against the posterior portions of the condyles 184, 186 of the femur.
The spacer instrument 100 is operated by the surgeon by rotating the top plate relative to the bottom plate so as to incline the upper surface of the top plate relative to the lower surface of the bottom plate. The surgeon operates the spacer instrument until the femur is directly rotated relative to the tibia and such that the ligaments 176, 178 are tensioned equally. The assessment of the tension of the ligaments 176, 178 can be made manually by the surgeon or through use of a pressure sensing device so as to determine the balance of the pressure exerted by the instrument 100 on the tibia. Once the degree of tilt of the spacer instrument 100 has been settled upon, the spacer instrument automatically locks to that degree of tilt, through the interaction of the pegs and detents. A cutting block 190 is then connected to the spacer instrument 100 by a mount 192 which releasably engages with an attachment feature 194 of the tibial plate 104. The cutting block 190 includes a first cutting guide 196 for making an anterior cut to the femur and a second cutting guide 198 for making a posterior cut to the femur (and also cutting guides for making anterior and posterior chamfer cuts). The mount 192 can be adjustable in height so as to vary the height of the posterior cut so as to set the size of the flexion gap. The mount 192 can also include a scale to provide a measure of the flexion gap that would be provided by different posterior cut heights. The cutting block 190 and mount 192 are configured such that the first cutting guide 196 and second cutting guide 198 each lies in a plane generally parallel to the plane of the lower surface of the bottom plate 104. Hence, the surgeon can make the anterior cut to remove the anterior portion of the femur, as illustrated by dashed line 200 using the first cutting guide and may also make the posterior cuts using the second cutting guide 198 to remove the posterior parts of the condyles, illustrated by dashed lines 202 and 204. Hence, the cutting block allows the anterior and posterior cuts to be made parallel to the initial tibial cut so as to produce a rectangular flexion gap.
Hence, the instrument and method embody the general concept of altering the alignment of the bones so as to achieve balanced ligaments rather than balancing the ligaments relative to a predetermined alignment. The surgical instrument 100 can be used to allow a measured technique or a balanced technique. In a measured technique, the angle of inclination of the spacer instrument can be set, e.g. to 3°, in order to check the balance of the knee joint at that specific angle. For example, a surgeon may determine that they consider a 3° angle to be appropriate and use the spacer instrument to create the 3° angle in the knee joint and then make cuts to the femur or tibia for that angle.
Alternatively, in the balanced technique, the instrument can be operated in situ in order to determine the angle which the ligaments are generally in balance. The cuts to the tibia or femur can then be made for the angle determined to provide balance of the ligaments.
Hence, the instrument of the invention allows for recutting of previously made cuts in order to correct imbalance, allows for the initial setting of the distal cut angle, femoral rotation, extension gap and correction gap. Hence, a wide variety of surgical techniques are possible using the angle adjustable spacer instrument of the invention.
It will be appreciated that while operation of the instrument by rotating the top plate relative to the lower plate has been described, the instrument may also be operated by rotating the bottom plate relative to the top plate, which remains substantially fixed. Additionally, or alternatively, both the top plate and bottom plate can be rotated in order to operate the instrument. It will also be appreciated that the instrument operates by allowing the angle between the upper surface of the top plate and the lower surface of the bottom plate to be adjusted. Whether the top plate tilts relative to the bottom plate, the bottom plate tilts relative to the top plate or the plates tilt relative to each other, is not material.
Various modifications and variations will be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art from the above discussion of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1115411.9 | Sep 2011 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/343,661, which is a National Stage 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Patent Application PCT/GB2012/052110, filed Aug. 28, 2012, which claimed priority to United Kingdom Application No. GB1115411.9, filed Sep. 7, 2011. The entirety of each of those application is incorporated into this application by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3750652 | Sherwin et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
4501266 | McDaniel et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4566448 | Rohr | Jan 1986 | A |
4795473 | Grimes | Jan 1989 | A |
4796610 | Cromartie | Jan 1989 | A |
4804000 | Lamb et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4808186 | Smith | Feb 1989 | A |
4822362 | Walker et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4825857 | Kenna | May 1989 | A |
4828562 | Kenna | May 1989 | A |
4834057 | McLeod | May 1989 | A |
4856993 | Maness et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4888021 | Forte et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4892093 | Zarnowski et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4892546 | Kotz et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4898161 | Grundei | Feb 1990 | A |
4899761 | Brown et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4907578 | Petersen | Mar 1990 | A |
4926847 | Luckman | May 1990 | A |
4932974 | Pappas et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4935023 | Whiteside et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936853 | Fabian et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4938762 | Wehrli | Jul 1990 | A |
4944756 | Kenna | Jul 1990 | A |
4959071 | Brown et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4963153 | Noesberger et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4973331 | Pursley et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4979949 | Matsen et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4986281 | Preves et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5002547 | Poggie et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5018514 | Grood et al. | May 1991 | A |
5020797 | Burns | Jun 1991 | A |
5032132 | Matsen et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5033291 | Podoloff et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5037423 | Kenna | Aug 1991 | A |
5056530 | Butler et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5080675 | Lawes et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5082003 | Lamb et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5098436 | Ferrante et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5122144 | Bert et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5125408 | Basser | Jun 1992 | A |
5129909 | Sutherland | Jul 1992 | A |
5197488 | Kovacevic | Mar 1993 | A |
5207711 | Caspari et al. | May 1993 | A |
5213112 | Niwa et al. | May 1993 | A |
5228459 | Caspari et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234433 | Bert et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5234434 | Goble | Aug 1993 | A |
5234435 | Seagrave | Aug 1993 | A |
5236432 | Matsen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250050 | Poggie et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257996 | McGuire | Nov 1993 | A |
5312411 | Steele et al. | May 1994 | A |
5326363 | Aikins | Jul 1994 | A |
5329933 | Graf | Jul 1994 | A |
5342367 | Ferrante et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5358527 | Forte | Oct 1994 | A |
5360016 | Kovacevic | Nov 1994 | A |
5364401 | Ferrante et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364402 | Mumme et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5395401 | Bahler | Mar 1995 | A |
5403319 | Matsen, III et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417694 | Marik et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425775 | Kovacevic et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431652 | Shimamoto et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5431653 | Callaway | Jul 1995 | A |
5443518 | Insall | Aug 1995 | A |
5456724 | Yen et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5470354 | Hershberger et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5489311 | Cipolletti | Feb 1996 | A |
5496352 | Renger | Mar 1996 | A |
5514144 | Bolton | May 1996 | A |
5514183 | Epstein et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520695 | Luckman | May 1996 | A |
5540696 | Booth, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5562674 | Stalcup et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569261 | Marik et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571110 | Matsen, III et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5571197 | Insall | Nov 1996 | A |
5597379 | Haines et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611774 | Postelmans | Mar 1997 | A |
5613971 | Lower et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5630820 | Todd | May 1997 | A |
5643272 | Haines et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649929 | Callaway | Jul 1997 | A |
5656785 | Trainor et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658293 | Vanlaningham | Aug 1997 | A |
5669914 | Eckhoff | Sep 1997 | A |
5671695 | Schroeder | Sep 1997 | A |
5682886 | Delp et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683397 | Vendrely et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688280 | Booth, Jr. et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688282 | Baron et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690635 | Matsen, III et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702422 | Stone | Dec 1997 | A |
5702463 | Pothier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5733292 | Gustilo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735904 | Pappas | Apr 1998 | A |
5743909 | Collette | Apr 1998 | A |
5769894 | Ferragamo | Jun 1998 | A |
5782925 | Collazo et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800438 | Tuke et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800552 | Forte | Sep 1998 | A |
5810827 | Haines et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824104 | Tuke | Oct 1998 | A |
5840047 | Stedham | Nov 1998 | A |
5860980 | Axelson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871018 | Delp et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871542 | Goodfellow et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879389 | Koshino | Mar 1999 | A |
5880976 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891150 | Chan | Apr 1999 | A |
5911723 | Ashby et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5931777 | Sava | Aug 1999 | A |
5935086 | Beacon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5989290 | Biedermann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013103 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019767 | Howell | Feb 2000 | A |
6022377 | Nuelle | Feb 2000 | A |
6034296 | Elvin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6056752 | Roger | May 2000 | A |
6056754 | Haines et al. | May 2000 | A |
6056756 | Eng et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080154 | Reay-Young et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086592 | Rosenberg et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096043 | Techiera et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102952 | Koshino | Aug 2000 | A |
6113604 | Whittaker et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126692 | Robie et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159217 | Roble et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174294 | Crabb et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6261296 | Aebi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6447448 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6488711 | Grafinger | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6540787 | Biegun et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553681 | Ekholm, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6575980 | Robie et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589283 | Metzger et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610096 | MacDonald | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6632225 | Sanford et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648896 | Overes et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6702821 | Bonutti | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706005 | Roy et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719796 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6758850 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770078 | Bonutti | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6821299 | Kirking et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827723 | Carson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6905513 | Metzger | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6923817 | Carson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6972039 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984249 | Keller | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7104996 | Bonutti | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7153281 | Holmes | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156853 | Muratsu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7309363 | Dietz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7412897 | Crottet et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7559931 | Stone | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7615055 | DiSilvestro | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7976550 | Trudeau | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8137361 | Duggineni et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8197489 | Chessar et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8303663 | Jimenez et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
9078669 | Dower | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9750619 | Rock | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20010021877 | Biegun et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020029045 | Bonutti | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052606 | Bonutti | May 2002 | A1 |
20020123754 | Holmes et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133175 | Carson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147455 | Carson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156480 | Overes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165550 | Frey et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030028196 | Bonutti | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030069591 | Carson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069644 | Kovacevic et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030130665 | Pinczewski | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144669 | Robinson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153978 | Whiteside | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187452 | Smith et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225416 | Bonvallet et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236472 | Van Hoeck et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019382 | Amirouche et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040064073 | Heldreth | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064191 | Wasielewski | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040097951 | Steffensmeier | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106927 | Ruffner et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122441 | Muratsu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040172129 | Schafer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040243148 | Wasielewski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249387 | Faoro | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021044 | Stone et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038442 | Freeman | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059980 | Overes | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085920 | Williamson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113846 | Carson | May 2005 | A1 |
20050149041 | McGinley et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177169 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177170 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177173 | Aebi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050234332 | Murphy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234448 | McCarthy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234465 | McCombs | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234466 | Stallings | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234468 | Carson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251026 | Stone | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267485 | Cordes et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060074432 | Stad et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060081063 | Neubauer et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060149277 | Cinquin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161051 | Terrill-Grisoni et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060224088 | Roche | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241569 | DiSilvestro | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271056 | Terrill-Grisoni et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070162142 | Stone | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070219561 | Lavallee et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233144 | Lavallee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239157 | Guillaume | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239165 | Amirouche | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244488 | Metzger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080051798 | Colquhoun et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080114367 | Meyer | May 2008 | A1 |
20080306413 | Crottet et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005708 | Johanson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018544 | Heavener | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043310 | Rasmussen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090099570 | Paradis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138019 | Wasielewski | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138021 | Colquhoun | May 2009 | A1 |
20090222089 | Hauri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090270869 | Colquhoun et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090318836 | Stone et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318930 | Stone et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318931 | Stone et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326544 | Chessar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100016705 | Stone | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063508 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063509 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064216 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069911 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076505 | Borja | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100137869 | Borja et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137871 | Borja | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100249789 | Rock et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100305575 | Wilkinson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10335410 | Feb 2005 | DE |
0720834 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1129676 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1245193 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1348382 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1645229 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1707159 | Nov 2008 | EP |
979636 | Apr 2009 | EP |
1402857 | Aug 2010 | EP |
1915951 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2198647 | Jun 1998 | GB |
7900739 | Oct 1979 | WO |
1996017552 | Jun 1996 | WO |
1999035972 | Jul 1999 | WO |
2000019911 | Apr 2000 | WO |
2001085038 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2002087466 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2002071924 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03065949 | Aug 2003 | WO |
9935972 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2003084412 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004008988 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2005023120 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005089681 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006136836 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007036694 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007036699 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2010011978 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010022272 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010030809 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010116394 | Oct 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Letter and Subsequently Filed Items in European Patent Application No. 12756236.1, filed Oct. 21, 2014. |
International Search Report, dated Dec. 11, 2006, (1 O Pages) (DEP5638). |
UK Search Report, dated Jan. 25, 2006, (4 Pages) (DEP5638). |
LCS Complete Mobile-Bearing Knee System, Surgical Technique, 3M1001, 0611-63-050 (Rev. 2), 2001 (44 Pages). |
AMK Congruency Instrument System, Surgical Technique, 2.7M1198, 0612-76-000, 1997 (16 Pages). |
Knee Balancer Complementing PFC Sigma and LCS Complete EGF Instrumentation, Reference Guide and Surgical Technique, 4M0703, 0612-21-500, 2003 (15 pages). |
PCT International Search Report for International App. No. PCT/GB2011/050540, dated Apr. 7, 2011 (12 Pages) (DEP6301). |
UK Search Report GB1006173_.7, dated Aug. 12, 2010 (3 Pages) (DEP6301). |
NJ LCS® Unicompartmental Knee System with Porocoat®, Surgical Procedure by Frederick F. Buechel, M.D., Biomedical Engineering Trust, South Orange NJ, 1994, (11 Pages). |
Rand, James A., M.D., Total Knee Arthroplasty, 1993 by Mayo Foundation, Raven Press, New York, 1993, (8 Pages). |
New Jersey LCS® Total Knee System, Surgical Technique, Using Milestone™ Instruments, R. Barry Sorrel's, M.D. and Frederick F. Buechel, M.D., DePuy, 20M0104, 0601-87, 1994, (57 Pages). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion PCT/GB2012/052110 dated Dec. 3, 2012. |
United Kingdom Search Report GB1115411.9 dated Dec. 8, 2011. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 09164235.5 - 1526, Dec. 22, 2009, 6 pgs. |
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09163230.7 - 2310, Sep. 17, 2009, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 8, 2006, 4 pages—PCT/GB20061003524. |
UK Search Report dated Jan. 25, 2006, 4 pages—related art GB0519829.6. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170360576 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14343661 | US | |
Child | 15696096 | US |