The present application claims priority from Dutch patent application NL 1025852, filed 31 Mar. 2004.
The invention relates to a surgical instrument to be used for suturing tissue while reducing the possibility of needle perforation accidents.
Standard suturing instruments and techniques present significant risks to both patient and surgeon by way of possible glove perforation accidents in which a suture needle penetrates the surgeon's glove. Such perforation accidents may allow pathogenic organisms such as, but not limited to, the hepatitis virus B, the hepatitis virus C and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to be transmitted from the patient to the practitioner.
Conversely, a perforation accident may cause a break in the sterile barrier between practitioner and patient, which increases the risk of the patient's wound becoming infected.
One approach to help avoid this problem involves the use of surgical forceps of the kind described in U.S. Patent Application US 2003/0045833 A1. The surgical forceps described in that application has near the distal end at the outside of an arm of the forceps a flexible material that can be used for manipulating a surgical needle during suturing in order to attempt to prevent needle perforation accidents.
Among the drawbacks of these and other surgical forceps is that when suturing using a surgical needle and a suture attached thereto, the tissue may sustain damage. This is a particular liability where delicate tissue is concerned through which it is difficult to pass the surgical needle without causing tissue damage. The point of the surgical needle initially pushes the tissue forward to subsequently lance it, which causes damage to the tissue. Moreover, in the surgical forceps described in the above application, the placement of the flexible material requires that the instrument be pushed further into the wound thereby increasing the likelihood of damaging the tissue and/or previously tied sutures.
Thus, there remains a need for suturing forceps, which minimize the risk of glove perforation accidents and tissue damage.
The present invention is directed to a surgical instrument (suturing forceps) useful in conventional surgery, endoscopic and robotic surgery. The instrument comprises a first arm and a second arm that are connected at a proximal end (optionally spring-connected) so as to bias the arms in an open configuration and which define a space between them which can be reduced or increased. At a distal end, the arms can be moved towards each other thereby reducing the space between the arms. The instrument further comprises a surgical needle-receiving and affixing portion herein referred to as a “bullet” at the distal end of at least the first arm and/or the second arm, at an inside and/or lower side of the distal end of an arm. The bullet may be removable from the instrument.
The invention is further directed to the forceps described above comprising an arm manipulating means by which one arm of the instrument, preferably the arm lacking the bullet may move away from the surgical field during the suturing procedure. Specifically, the manipulated arm is removed from the path defined by the movement of the surgical needle during suturing, which is itself defined by the curvature of the needle. Such manipulation of an arm avoids contact with the tissue being sutured thereby preventing tissue damage and facilitating the suturing process.
This may be accomplished using a variety of means including, for example, using a hinge mechanism fixed at the proximal or distal end of at least one arm of the instrument, as described in more detail below. The bullet can be placed at the distal end of the first arm and/or at the distal end of the hinge mechanism. The hinge is designed to provide a means for drawing the distal end of one of the arms away from the surgical field (preferably the arm opposite the bullet) as the distance between the distal ends of the arms increases. Conversely, as the distance between the distal ends of the arms decreases, the distal end of the arm acted upon by the hinge mechanism extends so that the arms become of similar length as the distal ends of the arms make contact with each other.
The invention is further directed to a method for suturing tissue using the instrument of the present invention comprising the steps of 1) securing and supporting a first area of tissue to be sutured with the distal ends of the instrument, 2) securing a surgical needle and a suture material attached thereto with a needle holding tool, 3) piercing the first area of tissue to be sutured with the needle using the bullet to support the tissue, 4) passing the needle through the tissue into or onto the bullet, 5) releasing the needle from the needle holding tool, 6) releasing the first area of tissue secured by the distal ends of the instrument, 7) guiding the affixed needle with the instrument following the curvature of the needle, 8) removing the needle from the bullet with the needle holding tool, and 9) repeating steps 1-8 on a second area of tissue to be sutured to the first area of the lesion whereupon the suture passing through the first and second areas of tissue is tied in a knot. Alternatively, prior to the bullet receiving and affixing the surgical needle, the surgical needle in one movement may pierce the first and second areas of tissue to be sutured. The suture is knotted by a force applied by the needle holding tool pulling on the end of the suture and a second pulling force applied by the instrument to which the surgical needle is affixed.
The invention will now be further elucidated by way of exemplary embodiments that form no limitation to the appended claims, and with reference to the following drawings.
In the drawings:
The invention is directed to a surgical instrument (suturing forceps), with which needle perforation accidents can be avoided, tissue damage during suturing can be reduced and which allows suturing to be performed more easily.
The following description is made by way of example and is not intended to limit the invention as set out in the appended claims.
The forceps of the present invention comprises at least a first and second arm that are connected at one end and which may be biased, for example, by a spring means, in an open position and which defines a space between them which can be reduced or increased. The instrument also comprises a needle receiving and affixing bullet that is preferably positioned at the distal end, at an inside and/or lower side of the end of an arm. The term “open” in the context of the present invention refers to the position wherein the distal ends of the two arms are apart. The term “closed” refers to the position wherein the distal ends of the two arms are in close proximity or touching. The term “form lock” refers to the properties of a bullet embodiment whereby the deformation of a bullet that is pierced by a surgical needle results in a pressure exerted on the surgical needle from the resistance of the bullet to return to its original form thereby affixing (locking) the surgical needle to the bullet.
When suturing tissue using a suture and surgical needle, the forceps of the present invention makes it possible to control the suturing process in such a manner that immediately after the point of the surgical needle has pierced the tissue, it is able to pass into the bullet where it is retained until removal by the surgeon, preferably with the use of a surgical needle holder. This allows the surgical needle to be manipulated safely during suturing without touching the needle with the hands, thereby reducing the possibility of needle perforation accidents.
The bullet also provides support for the portion of tissue being sutured by using the forceps of the present invention to effectively avoid tissue damage because the bullet provides a counter pressure against the pressure of the needle supporting the tissue to be sutured thereby minimizing tissue stretch. Furthermore, the suturing operation can be continued using the forceps to manipulate the needle, without the necessity of either manually touching the needle or using a needle holding instrument.
The bullet may be comprised of any material or designed in any way such that it is capable of receiving and removably affixing or retaining a surgical needle. For example, the material may be pierceable such as synthetic rubber or wire mesh. An example of a bullet comprised of wire mesh is illustrated in
The bullet may also be designed to have a narrow slit into which a surgical needle is guided such that when the forceps are manipulated to pull on the needle, flaps of the slit close thereby affixing the needle to the bullet. The needle is released by pulling or pushing it in the direction of the flaps thereby opening the flaps. Such an embodiment may be referred to as a “saloon door” mechanism. An example of this embodiment is illustrated in
In a further aspect of the invention, the bullet may be “loaded” with an electric or other charge or with receptors to guide the needle to the bullet such that the needle is controlled and gripped more easily.
In a further aspect of the invention the bullet is provided on a holder that is detachably placed on at least one arm as exemplified herein. The holder with the bullet may thus be a disposable component that can be supplied sterile, while the forceps upon which the holder is placed may be retained and sterilized from case to case. The holder with the bullet is designed to be removably placed on forceps of the kind illustrated in
In using the present invention there is a moment in suturing in which the surgeon pulls the needle (that is already fixed in the bullet) through the tissue. In order to do so without harming the tissue, the surgeon guides the forceps following the curvature of the needle. By doing so, the arm opposite to the arm with the bullet to which the needle is affixed can touch or even get stuck in the tissue. Providing a means for moving the opposite arm away from the surgical field when the distal ends of the two arms are apart alleviates this problem.
To this end, a preferred embodiment of the invention is comprised of the two arms of the forceps being of unequal length with a hinge mechanism, which is comprised of a hinge and a lever, attached to the shorter arm that is opposite the bullet. When the forceps are in a closed position, the distal end of lever extends to contact the distal end of the arm to which the bullet is attached. When in the open position, the lever retracts and is no longer in the way of making a circular motion with the forceps to pull the needle through the tissue along the curvature of the needle. Such an embodiment may be referred to as “double-hinge.”An example of this embodiment is illustrated in
For this embodiment, the hinge mechanism is comprised of a hinge that is medially fixed to a lever. The hinge is also fixed at the distal end of the shorter arm opposite the bullet such that the distal end of the lever acts as an extension of the shorter arm. The proximal end of the lever is slidably disposed along the inside of the longer arm. Examples of this embodiment are illustrated in
In an alternate embodiment of the invention, the hinge mechanism is in the form of a spring medially fixed to a sliding lever. The spring opens the forceps and by motion of the sliding lever makes the distal end of the arm that is to be moved away (i.e. the arm opposite the arm with the bullet) slide in the proximal direction when the forceps are open. When the forceps are closed, the sliding lever slides towards the distal end of the forceps to enable sufficient grip of the tissue. Such an embodiment may be referred to as “spring enforced sliding arm.”An example of this embodiment is illustrated in
In an alternate embodiment of the invention, the hinge mechanism is fixed to the distal end of the shorter arm of the forceps. Furthermore, the bullet is placed at the distal end of the hinge mechanism. Spring-forced movement of the hinge flips it away from the longer arm of the forceps and allows the surgeon to pull the surgical needle through, along the natural needle path, without damaging the tissue. Such an embodiment may be referred to as “flipping bullet.”An example of this embodiment is illustrated in
In an additional embodiment of the invention, an elliptical hinge mechanism at the proximal end of the forceps may be used in which the point of rotation in the proximal end makes a translating movement at the same time as the rotating movement takes place. This design “shortens” the arm that is opposite the bullet when the forceps are opened. Such an embodiment may be referred to as “accentric axis.”An example of this embodiment is illustrated in
In an additional embodiment of the invention, the hinge mechanism is comprised of a double spring. A first spring holds the two arms apart in the open position in which the arm opposite that which holds the bullet is shorter. When the first spring is engaged and the distal ends of the two arms are brought together, a second spring located at the proximal end of the instrument and fixed to the shorter arm is also engaged and extends the shorter arm such that the distal ends of the two arms meet when the forceps are in the closed position. Such an embodiment may be referred to as “double spring.”An example of this embodiment is illustrated in
Identical reference numerals used in the figures refer to similar parts.
Referring first to
These surgical forceps 1 are suitable to be used for suturing tissue and comprise a first forceps arm 2 and a second forceps arm 3, spring-connected at a proximal end 4, i.e. the end which during the manipulation of the forceps 1 lies in the hand and which arms define a space between them which an be reduced and increased.
At a distal end 5, the first forceps arm 2 and the second forceps arm 3 can be moved toward each other.
The bullet may also be provided on the second arm 3 or, as the case may be, only on the second arm 3. Within the framework of the invention, however, at least one of the forceps arms 2, 3 must be provided with a bullet 6.
As
The bullet 6 in one of its embodiments is preferably designed to be able to receive and affix a surgical needle pierced therethrough. A material to be used as the bullet 6 is suitably a synthetic material, for example synthetic rubber or other elastomeric material. Advantageously, the bullet 6 together with the end of the arm upon which it is placed define a space between the first arm 2 and the second arm 3 which can be reduced or increased. The fabrication of this is well known to the person skilled in the art and requires no further elucidation.
The use of the surgical forceps 1 according to the invention may conveniently be explained by way of a series of successive steps illustrated in the
Reference numerals 13 and 14 indicate two sutures made previously through the first and second tissue portions 11 and 12.
The remaining figures address the potential problem encountered in suturing in which the surgeon wants to pull the needle (that is affixed to the bullet) through the tissue. In order to do so without harming the tissue, the surgeon will want to guide the forceps following the curvature of the needle. By doing so, the arm opposite the arm with the flexible material can touch or even get stuck in the tissue.
It is also apparent that the forceps according to the present invention is not only useful in “open surgery,” its advantages may be exploited in endoscopic surgical procedures or in combination with other endoscopic tools wherein a single arm with a bullet attached at a distal end is employed. The bullet simultaneously supports the tissue to be pierced with a surgical needle and is capable of receiving and affixing the needle thereafter so that the needle can be manipulated with the instrument.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1025852 | Mar 2004 | NL | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1359164 | Giudice et al. | Nov 1920 | A |
2087372 | Crawford | Jul 1937 | A |
2504202 | Kadavy et al. | Apr 1950 | A |
2743726 | Grieshaber | May 1956 | A |
3349772 | Rygg | Oct 1967 | A |
3728739 | Semp | Apr 1973 | A |
3878848 | Hiebert | Apr 1975 | A |
3946740 | Bassett | Mar 1976 | A |
4561574 | Brown | Dec 1985 | A |
4821719 | Fogarty | Apr 1989 | A |
4955896 | Freeman | Sep 1990 | A |
5047049 | Salai | Sep 1991 | A |
5334215 | Chen | Aug 1994 | A |
5342375 | Lemole | Aug 1994 | A |
5405353 | Randall | Apr 1995 | A |
5487749 | Smith | Jan 1996 | A |
5490858 | Shuter | Feb 1996 | A |
5556403 | Michalos | Sep 1996 | A |
5618303 | Marlow et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5645552 | Sherts | Jul 1997 | A |
5797537 | Oberlin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5814069 | Schulze et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824009 | Fukuda et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5897571 | Kazama | Apr 1999 | A |
6059776 | Gatto | May 2000 | A |
6099539 | Howell et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6206896 | Howell et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6322570 | Matsutani et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6387106 | Howell et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6494860 | Rocamora et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6551329 | Kortenbach et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6989017 | Howell et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
20020107482 | Rocamora et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030004523 | Chan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045833 | Murdoch | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030208100 | Levy | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050125013 | Kessler | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050228441 | Wood et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070087602 | Smith et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070135824 | O'Brien | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
759 986 | Mar 1953 | DE |
759986 | Mar 1953 | DE |
0 351 165 | Jan 1990 | EP |
1762188 | Mar 2007 | EP |
2 474 303 | Jul 1981 | FR |
2396110 | Jun 2004 | GB |
08-033635 | Feb 1996 | JP |
11-216145 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2003-210486 | Jul 2003 | JP |
WO 2005094698 | Sep 1981 | WO |
9416628 | Aug 1994 | WO |
9911179 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 02068034 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02096312 | Dec 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050222612 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |