The present invention relates in general to surgical instruments that are suitable for endoscopically inserting an end effector (e.g., endocutter, grasper, cutter, staplers, clip applier, access device, drug/gene therapy delivery device, and an energy device using ultrasound, RF, laser, etc.) to a surgical site, and more particularly to such surgical instruments with an articulating shaft.
Endoscopic surgical instruments are often preferred over traditional open surgical devices since a smaller incision tends to reduce the post-operative recovery time and complications. Consequently, significant development has gone into a range of endoscopic surgical instruments that are suitable for precise placement of a distal end effector at a desired surgical site through a cannula of a trocar. These distal end effectors engage the tissue in a number of ways to achieve a diagnostic or therapeutic effect (e.g., endocutter, grasper, cutter, staplers, clip applier, access device, drug/gene therapy delivery device, and energy device using ultrasound, RF, laser, etc.).
The positioning of the end effector is constrained by the trocar. Generally, these endoscopic surgical instruments include a long shaft between the end effector and a handle portion manipulated by the clinician. This long shaft enables insertion to a desired depth and rotation about the longitudinal axis of the shaft, thereby positioning the end effector to a degree. With judicious placement of the trocar and use of graspers, for instance, through another trocar, often this amount of positioning is sufficient. Surgical stapling and severing instruments, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,465,895, are an example of an endoscopic surgical instrument that successfully positions an end effector by insertion and rotation.
More recently, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/443,617, “SURGICAL STAPLING INSTRUMENT INCORPORATING AN E-BEAM FIRING MECHANISM” to Shelton IV et al., filed on 20 May 2003, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, describes an improved “E-beam” firing bar for severing tissue and actuating staples. Some of the additional advantages include affirmatively spacing the jaws of the end effector, or more specifically a staple applying assembly, even if slightly too much or too little tissue is clamped for optimal staple formation. Moreover, the E-beam firing bar engages the end effector and staple cartridge in a way that enables several beneficial lockouts to be incorporated.
Depending upon the nature of the operation, it may be desirable to further adjust the positioning of the end effector of an endoscopic surgical instrument. In particular, it is often desirable to orient the end effector at an axis transverse to the longitudinal axis of the shaft of the instrument. The transverse movement of the end effector relative to the instrument shaft is conventionally referred to as “articulation”. This is typically accomplished by a pivot (or articulation) joint being placed in the extended shaft just proximal to the staple applying assembly. This allows the surgeon to articulate the staple applying assembly remotely to either side for better surgical placement of the staple lines and easier tissue manipulation and orientation. This articulated positioning permits the clinician to more easily engage tissue in some instances, such as behind an organ. In addition, articulated positioning advantageously allows an endoscope to be positioned behind the end effector without being blocked by the instrument shaft.
Approaches to articulating a surgical stapling and severing instrument tend to be complicated by integrating control of the articulation along with the control of closing the end effector to clamp tissue and fire the end effector (i.e., stapling and severing) within the small diameter constraints of an endoscopic instrument. Generally, the three control motions are all transferred through the shaft as longitudinal translations. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 5,673,840 discloses an accordion-like articulation mechanism (“flex-neck”) that is articulated by selectively drawing back one of two connecting rods through the implement shaft, each rod offset respectively on opposite sides of the shaft centerline. The connecting rods ratchet through a series of discrete positions.
Another example of longitudinal control of an articulation mechanism is U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,361 that includes an articulation link offset from a camming pivot such that pushing or pulling longitudinal translation of the articulation link effects articulation to a respective side. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,797,537 discloses a similar rod passing through the shaft to effect articulation.
In co-pending and commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/615,973 “SURGICAL INSTRUMENT INCORPORATING AN ARTICULATION MECHANISM HAVING ROTATION ABOUT THE LONGITUDINAL AXIS” to Frederick E. Shelton IV et al, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, a rotational motion is used to transfer articulation motion as an alternative to a longitudinal motion.
While these mechanically communicated articulation motions have successfully enabled an endoscopic surgical stapling and severing instrument to articulate, development trends pose numerous challenges and barriers to entry into the market. Conflicting design objects include a shaft of as small a diameter as possible to reduce the size of the surgical opening yet with sufficient strength to perform the several motions (e.g., closing, firing, articulation, rotation, etc.). In addition, transferring sufficient force without binding and other frictional problems imposes design constraints that limit desirable features and reliability.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,755,338, a medical instrument has a shaft that is manually deformable to a desired curved shape. To accommodate longitudinal clamping and firing motions down the deformable shaft, a pair of hydraulic lines pass down the shaft that are each part of a respective closed hydraulic system. Each hydraulic line communicates between a proximal piston moved by a trigger and a distal activator. The distal activator for clamping is a linearly moving piston that is proximally biased by a spring and mechanically connected to an end effector. The distal activator for firing is an actuation balloon that expands linearly in the distal direction. While linearly moving activators provide one way to cause actuation at a distal end of an implement portion of a medical portion, it may be desirable to produce another type of actuating motion.
Consequently, a significant need exists for a surgical instrument that incorporates an actuating mechanism that that may be incorporated within the close confines of an implement portion.
The invention overcomes the above-noted and other deficiencies of the prior art by providing a surgical instrument having an implement portion that incorporates fluid bladders in the implement portion that reliably expand and contract in response to fluid transfer from a handle.
In one aspect of the invention, a surgical instrument has a handle having a control positionable to vary an internal volume of a reservoir with fluid transfer in relation to this volume change occurring through an elongate implement portion having a longitudinal axis sized for insertion through a cannula to reach internal tissue. An actuator changes in volume in relation to the fluid transfer and is positioned within a cavity in the implement portion to laterally actuate an actuating member. The actuator and/or the reservoir are advantageously formed of a bladder shaped for lateral actuation Thereby, fluid transfer control may be flexibly integrated into an elongate implement portion, avoiding various constraints on mechanical linkages that would otherwise be generally used.
In another aspect of the invention, a surgical instrument includes a compression surface movably attached to a handle to vary an internal volume of a reservoir bladder that performs fluid transfer in relation thereto to cause the actuation of the actuating bladder in the implement portion. Thereby, a closed fluid control system may be incorporated into a surgical instrument with desirable performance characteristics.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a surgical instrument includes a differential control in a handle to differentially vary fluid transfer from the fluid source to first and second conduits that respectively control first and second actuating bladders that work differentially in opposition against a motive surface of an actuated member attached to an elongate implement portion. Thereby, the advantages of selectively forcing the motive surface with similar force in either of two directions achieves responsive actuation of the implement portion as desired.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention shall be made apparent from the accompanying drawings and the description thereof.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description of the invention given above and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.
Overview of articulating shaft. Turning to the Drawings, wherein like numerals denote like components throughout the several views,
Handle. The surgical and stapling and severing instrument 10 includes a handle portion 22 proximally connected to the implement portion 12 for providing positioning, articulation, closure and firing motions thereto. The handle portion 22 includes a pistol grip 24 toward which a closure trigger 26 is pivotally and proximally drawn by the clinician to cause clamping, or closing, of the staple applying assembly 20. A firing trigger 28 is farther outboard of the closure trigger 26 and is pivotally drawn by the clinician to cause the stapling and severing of clamped tissue clamped in the staple applying assembly 20. Thereafter, a closure release button 30 is depressed to release the clamped closure trigger 26, and thus the severed and stapled ends of the clamped tissue. The handle portion 22 also includes a rotation knob 32 coupled for movement with the elongate shaft 16 to rotate the shaft 16 and the articulated staple applying assembly 20 about the longitudinal axis of the shaft 16. The handle portion 22 also includes a firing refraction handle 34 to assist in retracting a firing mechanism (not depicted in
It will be appreciated that the terms “proximal” and “distal” are used herein with reference to a clinician gripping a handle of an instrument. Thus, the surgical stapling assembly 20 is distal with respect to the more proximal handle portion 22. It will be further appreciated that, for convenience and clarity, spatial terms such as “vertical” and “horizontal” are used herein with respect to the drawings. However, surgical instruments are used in many orientations and positions, and these terms are not intended to be limiting and absolute.
An illustrative multi-stroke handle portion 22 for the surgical stapling and severing instrument 10 of
Implement portion (articulating elongate shaft and staple applying assembly). In
The staple applying assembly 20 is described in greater detail in co-pending and commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/955,042, “ARTICULATING SURGICAL STAPLING INSTRUMENT INCORPORATING A TWO-PIECE E-BEAM FIRING MECHANISM” to Frederick E. Shelton IV, et al., filed 30 Sep. 2004, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
With particular reference to
The elongate shaft 16 supports the firing motion by receiving a firing rod 60 that rotatingly engages firing components of the handle portion 22 (not shown). The firing rod 60 enters a proximal opening 62 along the longitudinal centerline of the frame ground 48. The distal portion of the frame ground 48 includes a firing bar slot 64 along its bottom that communicates with the proximal opening 62. A firing bar 66 longitudinally translates in the firing bar slot 64 and includes an upwardly projecting proximal pin 68 that engages a distal end 70 of the firing rod 60 to form a firing member.
The handle portion 22 supports articulation by incorporating a rectangular reservoir cavity 72, one lateral portion depicted in a distal portion of the rotation knob 32. A bottom compartment 74 that resides within the rectangular reservoir cavity 72 has laterally spaced apart left and right baffles 76, 78. An articulation actuator 80 slides laterally overtop of the bottom compartment 74, its downward laterally spaced left and right flanges 82, 84, which are outboard of the baffles 76, 78, each communicating laterally to left and right push buttons 86, 88 that extend outwardly from the respective shell halves of the rotation knob 32. The lateral movement of the articulation actuator 80 draws left and right flanges 82, 84 nearer and farther respectively to the left and right baffles 76, 78, operating against left and right reservoir bladders 90, 92 of a fluidic articulation system 94, each bladder 90, 92 communicating respectively and distally to left and right fluid conduits or passageways 96, 98 that in turn communicate respectively with left and right actuating bladders 100, 102. The latter oppose and laterally pivot a T-bar 104 of the articulation mechanism 14.
The frame assembly 44 constrains these fluidic actuations by including a top and distal recessed table 106 of the frame ground 48 upon which resides the fluid passages 96, 98 and actuating bladders 100, 102. The T-bar 104 also slidingly resides upon the recessed table 106 between the actuating bladders 100, 102. Proximal to the T-Bar 104, a raised barrier rib 108 is aligned thereto, serving to prevent inward expansion of the fluid passages 96, 98. The frame assembly 44 has a rounded top frame cover (spacer) 110 that slides overtop of the frame ground 48, preventing vertical expansion of the fluid passages 96, 98 and actuating bladders 100, 102, as well as constraining any vertical movement of the T-bar 104. In particular, the frame cover 110 includes features that enable it to also provide an articulation locking member 111.
A distal end (“rack”) 112 of the T-bar 104 engages to pivot a proximally directed gear segment 115 of an articulated distal frame member 114 of the articulation mechanism 14. An articulating closure ring 116 encompasses the distal frame member 114 and includes a horseshoe aperture 118 that engages the anvil 42. A double pivoting attachment is formed between the closure straight tube 52 and articulating closure ring 116 over the articulating mechanism 14, allowing longitudinal closure motion even when the articulation mechanism 14 is articulated. In particular, top and bottom distally projecting pivot tabs 119, 120 on the closure straight tube 52 having pin holes 122, 124 respectively are longitudinally spaced away from corresponding top and bottom proximally projecting pivot tabs 126, 128 on the articulating closure ring 116 having pin holes 130, 132 respectively. An upper double pivot link 134 has longitudinally spaced upwardly directed distal and aft pins 136, 138 that engage pin holes 130, 122 respectively and a lower double pivot link 140 has longitudinally spaced downwardly projecting distal and aft pins 142, 144 that engage pin holes 132, 124 respectively
In
The articulation lock mechanism 200 is described in greater detail in the commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/194,437, “Surgical Instrument with an Articulation Shaft Locking Mechanism” to Wales et al., filed 1 Aug. 2005, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The elongate shaft 16 is depicted in an articulated position with the closure sleeve assembly 46 removed from around the frame assembly 44 and without the elongate channel 40 and anvil 42. Articulation actuator 80 is shown moved laterally to the left to compress right proximal reservoir bladder 90 and expanded distal right actuation bladder 100 moving T-bar 104 to the position shown. Thus, lateral movement of the articulation actuator 80 articulates the distal frame 114 clockwise about the single pivot frame ground 48 as shown. The articulation actuator 80 advantageously also automatically engages and disengages the articulation lock mechanism 200. In particular, a toothed detent surface 225 along a proximal top surface of the articulation actuator 80 receives an upwardly projecting locking pin 226 from the proximal end 204 of the articulation locking member 111. The engagement of the locking pin 226 within the root of the toothed detent surface 225 provides sufficient distal movement of the articulation locking member 111 for locking engagement. Lateral movement by an operator of the articulation actuator 80 proximally urges the locking pin 226 proximally, and thus disengages the articulation locking member 111 from the distal frame member 114. When the operator releases the articulation actuator 80, the locking pin 226 is urged by the compression spring 202 into the adjacent detent in detent surface 225 to lock the locking mechanism 111, and thereby the staple applying assembly 20, and to constrain the articulation mechanism 14 at a desired articulation position by constraining and expanding the inflated shape of the proximal left and right reservoir bladders 90, 92.
In use, a laterally moving articulation mechanism 230 is shown schematically in
Rather than a rounded rectangular shape, the cross sectional shape of a bladder may be modified to be any shape. For example it could be advantageous to construct the distal and/or proximal bladders as a pleated bellows. In
Fluid Bladders. It should be appreciated with the benefit of the present disclosure that such bladders may be constructed in various ways from various combinations of materials. While shown as a unified part above, these bladders may be assembled from multiple parts or constructed as a single unitary fluid bladder. For multiple part construction, at least one of the bladders may be attached to any of the other elements. Many leak proof attachment methods are available for assembly such as welding, glue, press fit, heat staking, crimp fittings, clamps fittings, joints and the like. Two basic types of fluid bladders may be constructed. One is a high pressure, non-elastic rigid bladder from either rigid or elastomeric materials, and the other is a lower pressure elastomeric balloon.
Rigid balloon materials are known in the medical arts and are used for dilation or angioplasty or the expansion of stents within blood vessel walls. Rigid balloons are made from non-compliant or low compliant materials that retain their designed size and shape under high-pressure loading. Typically, these balloons are thin walled and are formed from high tensile materials with low elongation. Typical materials for these balloons are polyvinyl chloride (PVC), cross linked polyethylene, and polyester (PET) polyethylene terrapthalate, nylon and others. For angioplasty balloons, thin walled sections of PET tubing may be blow molded into a balloon shape. Each of the left and right fluid bladders may be formed from a continuous piece of thin walled tubing with both the proximal and distal bladders formed by expanding local sections of the thin walled tubing. Expansion of the proximal and distal bladder areas may be accomplished by locally heating the tubing and blow molding the bladder shapes therein. One of the open ends of the formed fluid bladders may then be sealed, and the other open end of the bladders may act as a fill port for fluids. After filling, the open fill port is sealed. Alternately, the fluid bladders may be assembled from multiple pieces rather than a single piece. Non-bladder portions of the fluid bladders, such as fluid passageways, may be formed from rigid or semi-rigid tubing or other materials.
Alternately, elastomeric balloons may also be used to construct fluid bladders. These elastomeric materials are formed into a first shape and, with the application of pressure, may expand to a larger shape. Elastomeric materials may expand and return to the original shape a number of times without degradation of the elastomeric properties. While not able to handle pressures as high as rigid materials, elastomeric bladders may be used to articulate. Confining or constraining the elastomeric fluid bladders between walls or constraints prevents bulging of bladder material into unwanted areas and increases the forces that may be applied. Elastomeric bladders may be constructed by various processes including dip molding or, like IV bags, formed from two sheets that are welded or glued together. Elastomeric bladders may be formed from latex, rubber, silicone, polyurethane, polyethelene, polypropelene, Teflon, or any one of a number of elastic or semi-elastic engineering materials.
Additionally, conventional blow molding techniques may be used to form bladders. Unlike the thin walled PET shrink tubing used in angioplasty balloons, conventional blow molding techniques use a hollow tube or molded hollow preform that is heated and moved to an injection station where low pressure air is typically used to initially inflate the rod or preform. A burst of high-pressure gas is then applied to force the expanded hot tube or preform into contact with the walls of the mold to cool the blown material in the net shape. While producing thin walls, the preform blow molding process produces thin walls that are much thicker than the less than 4 mil angioplasty balloons. This process forms many current products such as soda bottles, disposable pipettes with a rigid tube and expanded bladder, and containers. For the formation of bladders, a preform shape is first injection molded with the appropriate material thickness at the expandable bladder areas to provide the desired wall thickness when the bladders are expanded in the blow molding process. Once the bladders are blow molded into net shape, they may be filled with fluid and sealed. Appropriate blow molding materials include nylon, polyester (PET), polyethelene, polyprolelene, high density polyethelene (HDPE) and any one of a number of known blow molding materials.
In addition to rigid and elastomeric bladders, bladder construction may be springy or flaccid. That is, at least one of the proximal bladders or at least one of the distal bladders may be constructed from a spring material that wants to resume its original shape after compression and release. Alternately, at least one of the proximal bladders or at least one of the distal bladders may be constructed from a generally flaccid material. Such materials have a weak spring rate, if any, and do not tend to expand back to the original pre-deformed shape. Flaccid bladders or springy bladders may advantageously include the internal compression spring that forces the walls of the bladder outward. The internal compression spring may be formed from a variety of materials including metallic springs, plastic springs, foams, squeezable elastomerics and the like. A sealed assembly of a full flaccid bladder with a partially filled spring bladder (on a passageway) results in the spring bladder expanding and drawing fluid from the flaccid bladder. Assembly of a pair of partially compressed spring bladders (of equal spring rate walls and size) results in both spring bladders being in the partial compressed position. Compression of one of the partially filled spring bladders results in full expansion of the uncompressed spring bladder and reduction of the compressed spring bladder. Release of the compressed spring bladder enables the compressed spring bladder to expand and draw fluid back into the compressed spring bladder. This process is spring rate controlled and if both bladders have the same spring rate, the fluid will be drawn back into the released compressed spring bladder until both spring bladders are equally filled. If desired, mismatched spring rates for the spring bladders may be used to draw and store fluids into one of the bladders as desired.
In
In
In
In
Martensite, the relatively soft and easily deformed phase of SMAs, exists at lower temperatures. Austenite, the stronger phase of shape memory alloys, occurs at higher temperatures. The shape of the Austenite structure is cubic. The un-deformed Martensite phase is the same size and shape as the cubic Austenite phase on a macroscopic scale, so that no change in size or shape is visible in shape memory alloys until the Martensite is deformed. The temperatures at which each of these phases begin and finish forming are represented by the following variables: Ms, for the temperature at which Marsenite starts to form; Mf, for the temperature at which Marsenite finishes forming; and Af, for the temperature at which Arsenite finishes forming. The shape memory effect is observed when the temperature of a piece of shape memory alloy is cooled to below the temperature Mf. At this stage, the alloy is completely composed of Martensite which can be easily deformed. After distorting the SMA, the original shape can be recovered simply by heating the wire above the temperature Af. The heat transferred to the wire is the power driving the molecular rearrangement of the SMA, similar to heat melting ice into water, but the SMA remains solid. The deformed Martensite is now transformed to the cubic Austenite phase, which is configured in the original shape of the wire.
Pseudo-elasticity occurs in SMAs when the SMA is completely composed of Austenite (temperature is greater than Af). Unlike the shape memory effect, pseudo-elasticity occurs without a change in temperature. The load on the SMA is increased until the Austenite becomes transformed into Martensite simply due to the loading. The loading is absorbed by the softer Martensite, but as soon as the loading is decreased, the Martensite begins to transform back to Austenite since the temperature of the wire is still above Af, and the wire springs back to its original shape.
Thus, the deformable bladder 1006 may be deformed by fluid pressure and/or mechanical pressure with the shape memory effect or pseudo-elasticity relied upon to restore the deformable bladder 1006 to a desired shape (e.g., compressed or expanded). The flaccid bladder 1002 transfers a corresponding amount of fluid through the rigid conduit 1004 in proportion to the change in volume of the deformable bladder 1006. Either the flaccid bladder 1002 or the deformable bladder 1006 may serve as an actuating bladder with the other serving as a reservoir bladder having a controlled volume. For example, a deformable bladder 1006 (i.e., actuating bladder) may be formed to have a pleated, compressed state that is then heat treated to remember that shape. Alternatively, the deformable bladder 1006 may formed to have an expanded shape and then be deformed to a compressed state.
In
In
Alternately, whereas a three-layer laminated bladder is described above with the layers in a selected order, laminated bladders can be made from any two or more layers and the order of the layers and layer materials can be varied to suit the needs of the surgical instrument. For example, it can be advantageous to add an additional lubricated layer as the innermost layer to the three layers 1202, 1204, and 1206 listed above for a dry fluid such as microparticles (described below), or to use an inner protective layer on an outer metal layer to act as a barrier between the metal and fluid.
While the present invention has been illustrated by description of several embodiments and while the illustrative embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications may readily appear to those skilled in the art.
For example, a single reservoir bladder may serve as both a left and right actuating bladder as described in the aforementioned and incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/061,908 entitled “SURGICAL INSTRUMENT INCORPORATING A FLUID TRANSFER CONTROLLED ARTICULATION MECHANISM” to Kenneth Wales and Chad Boudreaux filed on 18 Feb. 2005.
For another example, reservoir and/or actuating bladders may be incorporated into a surgical instrument for purposes other than articulation, such as for opening and/or closing an anvil of a stapling and severing end effector as described in commonly owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/165,094, entitled “SURGICAL INSTRUMENT HAVING FLUID ACTUATED OPPOSING JAWS” to Wales et al., filed 23 Jun. 2005, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
As yet another example, a single fluid transfer approach may be incorporated wherein a single fluid actuator expands and compresses to effect articulation, perhaps assisted by a resilient opposing member that is not in fluid or pneumatic communication with the handle. An application consistent with such a design, for instance, could include just one bladder attached to a T-bar so that when compressed by the withdrawal of fluid, it pulls the T-bar with it.
As yet a further example, fluids used in a laterally moving device may be either compressible or incompressible. As used herein, the term “fluid” comprises liquids, gases, gels, microparticles, and any other material which may be made to flow between a pressure gradient. While any fluid may be used, sterilized solutions such as saline, mineral oil or silicone are illustrative flowable materials.
The present invention is a continuation-in-part application of commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/061,908 entitled “SURGICAL INSTRUMENT INCORPORATING A FLUID TRANSFER CONTROLLED ARTICULATION MECHANISM” to Kenneth Wales and Chad Boudreaux filed on 18 Feb. 2005, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3506005 | MacCarone et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3726134 | Grabovac | Apr 1973 | A |
4331277 | Green et al. | May 1982 | A |
4485817 | Swiggett | Dec 1984 | A |
4488523 | Schichman | Dec 1984 | A |
4794912 | Lia | Jan 1989 | A |
4921482 | Hammerslag et al. | May 1990 | A |
5005754 | Van Overloop | Apr 1991 | A |
5018657 | Pedlick et al. | May 1991 | A |
5179934 | Nagayoshi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197649 | Bessler et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5219111 | Bilotti et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5250074 | Wilk et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5275608 | Forman et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5312023 | Green et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314466 | Stern et al. | May 1994 | A |
5330502 | Hassler et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5339723 | Huitema | Aug 1994 | A |
5356064 | Green et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361583 | Huitema | Nov 1994 | A |
5381943 | Allen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5405344 | Williamson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5409498 | Braddock et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411508 | Bessler et al. | May 1995 | A |
5411519 | Tovey et al. | May 1995 | A |
5441494 | Ortiz | Aug 1995 | A |
5456401 | Green et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456684 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465895 | Knodel et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5468250 | Paraschac et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5482197 | Green et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485952 | Fontayne | Jan 1996 | A |
5518164 | Hooven | May 1996 | A |
5520678 | Heckele et al. | May 1996 | A |
5530502 | Petruchik | Jun 1996 | A |
5547117 | Hamblin et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562682 | Oberlin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573543 | Akopov et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575799 | Bolanos et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5601572 | Middleman et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5620649 | Trotta | Apr 1997 | A |
5632433 | Grant et al. | May 1997 | A |
5662662 | Bishop et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669544 | Schulze et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673840 | Schulze et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5673841 | Schulze et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690269 | Bolanos et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692668 | Schulze et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702408 | Wales et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5743456 | Jones et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752973 | Kieturakis | May 1998 | A |
5762255 | Chrisman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779727 | Orejola et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782859 | Nicholas et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797536 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797537 | Oberlin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5826776 | Schulze et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829662 | Allen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860995 | Berkelaar | Jan 1999 | A |
5865361 | Milliman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5901895 | Heaton et al. | May 1999 | A |
5918791 | Sorrentino et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6010054 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6139508 | Simpson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6460749 | Levinson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485409 | Voloshin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488197 | Whitman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506202 | Dutta et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6666854 | Lange | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6667825 | Lu et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669073 | Milliman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6715259 | Johnston et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6755338 | Hahnen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756094 | Wang et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6786382 | Hoffman | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6830174 | Hillstead et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6877647 | Green et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6905057 | Swayze et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6951675 | Chin et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6953139 | Milliman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6964363 | Wales et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978921 | Shelton | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981628 | Wales | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7087052 | Sampson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087071 | Nicholas et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111769 | Wales et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112357 | Miller et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7159750 | Racenet et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166077 | Millay et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7213736 | Wales et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7407074 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410086 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7481824 | Gillum et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7588177 | Racenet | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20030111507 | Nunez | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030045900 | Hahnen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030178848 | Williams | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040002726 | Nunez et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040108357 | Milliman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040173659 | Green et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179244 | Lai | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040232196 | Shelton et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232197 | Shelton et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232201 | Wenchell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243176 | Hahnen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006429 | Wales et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050006430 | Wales | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050006432 | Racenet et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050006434 | Wales et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050070958 | Swayze et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107824 | Hillstead et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050165415 | Wales | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050263562 | Shelton | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011699 | Olson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060016853 | Racenet | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022014 | Shelton, IV et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060022015 | Shelton, IV et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025809 | Shelton, IV | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025810 | Shelton, IV | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025811 | Shelton, IV | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025813 | Shelton et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025817 | Ortiz et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041273 | Ortiz et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047307 | Ortiz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047308 | Ortiz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089535 | Raz et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060190028 | Wales | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190032 | Wales | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060226196 | Hueil et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229665 | Wales et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259071 | Nicholas et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289600 | Wales et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060289602 | Wales et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070027468 | Wales et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070152014 | Gillum et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
071959 | Feb 1983 | EP |
0 324 635 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0 598 976 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0717959 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0769273 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0807409 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0 603 472 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1495726 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1 522 263 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1627605 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1 693 008 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1693008 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1 785 098 | May 2007 | EP |
WO 0193766 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 02062241 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03013374 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03101313 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004002327 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004006980 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004032762 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004112618 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060190032 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11061908 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11239528 | US |