This invention relates to the field of orthopaedic surgery. In particular, the invention relates to a kit for knee replacement surgery, to components and tools of the kit, and to methods of knee replacement using the kit, components and tools. More particularly, the invention relates to the field of secondary knee replacement surgery, which is also known as corrective, or revisionary, knee replacement surgery.
Knee replacement surgery, where implants are fixed to the modified opposing ends of a patient's femur and tibia to replace worn joint surfaces, and to provide a functioning, artificial joint, is now a relatively routine surgical procedure. Conventional knee replacement surgery involves a process of trial and error in fitting a series of different sized and shaped trial implants, which vary according to the patient's physiology, assessing how the trial implants function when the artificial knee joint is in flexion and in extension, before equivalent final replacement implants are fitted. Surgeons are provided with kits of components, including several trial implants of different sizes, and combinations of shims and spacers, and tools for each procedure. This methodology has several disadvantages in practice. First, large numbers of components and tools, are required by conventional kits, many of which will not be used in the surgical procedure but which are still required to be stored, handled and sterilised. Most of those unused components are the different sized trial implants. Second, the procedures are physical and time consuming.
A critical aspect for success in knee replacement surgery is restoring the joint line, i.e. arranging the femoral and tibial implants in relation to the remaining femur and tibia so that they articulate around substantially the same axis as for the un-operated knee joint, as joint line position plays an important role in knee movement and function. Joint line position is determined in terms of the anterior-posterior size of the unoperated femur, the rearward offset of the tibial implant, and through arranging the tibial implant to cover as much of the upper surface of the operated tibia. Studies have shown that the restoration of the joint line leads to improved knee function, better ligament stability, and an improved range of movement.
Another important aspect of knee replacement surgery is ligament balancing i.e. arranging the operation of the replacement joint so that any remaining lateral and medial collateral ligaments on either side of the knee are balanced, and so not unevenly strained, during operation of the knee joint—as this would lead to ligamentous instability.
The correct location of the patella, whether natural or artificial, is also important in knee replacement surgery.
Some patients may need a more complex type of knee replacement known as secondary or revision knee replacement, where there has been significant bone loss due to arthritis or a fracture, a major deformity of the knee, or where there is weakness of the main knee ligaments leading to joint instability. Such revision knee replacements are performed in cases of second or third replacements in a particular knee. The surgical procedure for revision knee replacement surgery is more complicated, as the surgeon has significantly less bone to work with, as landmarks on the femur and tibia are lost as a result of the primary knee replacement, and because of the need to fit the implants so as to restore the joint line as well as possible. In practice, unintended elevation of the joint line is common in revision knee replacement. However, an increase in joint line elevation of only 8 mm or more leads to reduced knee function.
The femoral and tibial implants for secondary knee replacements usually have a long stem, which is securely fixed into the bone cavity (the diapyhseal canal), allowing the implant components greater stability. The implant components may also interlock in the centre of the knee to form a hinge also to give greater stability. Extra pieces of metal and/or plastic may be used to compensate for any removed or badly damaged bone.
Conventionally, the components and tools for secondary knee replacement surgery are supplied to a surgeon in a set of 8 to 20 standard instrument boxes weighing a total of 100 to 200 kg. All those boxes and the components and tools that they contain must be sterilised before use, leading to unnecessary costs. Sterilising such a large amount of surgical componentry is expensive—typically costing €1-2000 per operation simply to sterilise.
More recently, secondary knee replacement kits have been offered which are provided in only two standard instrument boxes. However, those kits still involve a large number of trial implants, and do not involve innovation in the measuring, cutting or trialling functions.
There is a need for simplification of the kits for knee replacement surgery, especially secondary or revision surgery, in order to reduce sterilisation, handling and storage costs. There is also a need to reduce the time taken for surgery, in order to reduce the impact on patients and to improve surgical efficiency. Furthermore, there is a need to reduce the complexity of such kits whilst still at least maintaining, and preferably enhancing, a surgeon's ability to chose suitable replacement implants.
In a previous patent application, the disclosure of which is incorporated by way of reference, EP2145590A, the applicant has disclosed a kit for secondary knee replacement surgery which obviates many of the disadvantages of previous kits. The adjustable unit includes protruding arms which connects to a bulky external position detector which detects the position of the components in situ. This is a somewhat cumbersome arrangement. The trialling of femoral and tibial implants, and the cutting of the femur may also be somewhat inhibited in the kit of EP2145590A.
The Knee Joint-Line Balancer (apparently described only in the literature in ten Ham, A. M. et al The Knee 12 (2005) 89-92) is an adjustable jig, designed only to work with a Biomet™ knee implant kit for determining the size of trial implants required, indicating the joint line and height of the patella, and allowing better planning of the joint line and patellar position. The jig is fixed to the femur with the knee in flexion, after the cutting of a proximal tibial cut (at 90 degrees to the tibia). After cutting the proximal tibial cut, the size of the femur implant is then estimated on the jig. The knee is then extended and the stability and extension of the knee tested. Finally, the patella height is measured, and the joint line determined. From the dimensions taken from the jig, suitable implants can be selected. The Knee Joint-Line Balancer only assists in sizing implants, and does not assist a surgeon in cutting the femur or tibia.
US 2013/0296860 and EP2772231 disclose devices and methods for conducting knee surgery procedures in particular knee replacement procedures and particularly revision total knee replacement procedures.
It is an object of the invention to provide a simplified yet improved system for knee replacement surgery, especially secondary or revision surgery, with aims including reducing the amount of components involved in the surgery, and/or to improve surgical efficiency, and/or to reduce sterilisation costs. In particular, it is an object of the invention to provide a system for knee replacement surgery such as a jig, the use of which leads to improved joint line determination and/or ligament balancing, and to provide a system which is configurable to most closely resemble the final replacement implants, and which has improved stability compared to known systems.
According to one aspect of the invention there is provided a sizing, trialling and cutting jig for knee replacement surgery on a patient having a femur and a tibia, the jig comprising:
According to another aspect of the invention there is provide a modular jig for knee replacement surgery for a patient requiring knee replacement surgery, the jig comprising:
The jig according to either aspect of the present invention has four principal functions i.e. that of determining the correct size implants required, trialling and adjusting the function of the replacement joint, balancing the ligaments, and providing cutting guides for cutting the bone.
According to the first aspect of the invention, the adjustable femur joint-specific sizing assembly is adjustable by means of a geared mechanism to move the lowest joint surface away from the longitudinal axis of the femur, increasing the size of the assembly.
The femoral backplate may include a sleeve which receives a stem-engaging sleeve of the femoral sizing assembly.
The femoral backplate is preferably of unitary construction, simplifying and strengthening the jig.
The jig may include an additional femoral cutting guide.
The jig may include or cooperate with support means for supporting a patella.
One or each stem for mounting the jig may be provided by a reamer shaft from a reamer with detachable handle or drive means inserted in the femur or tibia.
The tibial joint-specific sizing assembly may include a tibial backplate which has a collar which, in use, is slidably received in a coaxially mounted tubular mount depending from the tibial implant.
A tibia-specific cutting guide may be slidably mounted on an arm extending from and integral with the tibial backplate.
The tibia joint-specific sizing assembly may be fixed to the side of the tibia by fixing means which cooperate with a fixing guide which is slidably mounted on an arm extending from and integral with the tibial backplate.
The femoral joint-specific sizing assembly may be fixed to the side of the femur by fixing means which cooperate with a fixing guide which is slidably mounted on an arm extending from and integral with the femoral backplate.
Suitable fixing means include pins or screws.
Preferably a ruler having visual dimension markings depends downwardly from the tibia joint-specific sizing assembly. More preferably, a ruler extends upwardly from the femoral sizing assembly.
The surgical cutting device is typically a saw.
The invention also provides a tibial joint measuring device, the device comprising an element which fixes to a tibial surface, a plate, overlying the element and the tibia, which is moveable over the element, means for recording the position of the plate in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral dimensions.
According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a complete surgical tool and component kit for a knee replacement operation in a single instrument box of standard dimensions. The kit of the present invention reduces the number of instrument boxes compared to conventional kits by a factor of 5-10 times. In particular this is made possible because no trial implants are required.
The surgical workflow involved when using a kit in accordance with the invention is significantly shorter than with conventional kits, with the number of surgical manipulations being reduced compared with the use of conventional kits.
The kit may comprise a jig as described above, a tibial joint measuring device as described above, suitable femoral and tibial reamers, femoral and tibial implants.
According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a method of knee replacement surgery, the method comprising
This surgical method is significantly more efficient than previous methods as it does not require fitting and testing numerous trial implants, because the joint function can be readily tested and modified, the bone cuts can be performed using the guides provided with or associated with the jig, and because other significant dimensions and orientations can be determined before fitting the final implants.
A kit, components and tools for secondary knee replacement surgery, and methods of surgery using the kit will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings,
The jig 10 is relatively compact compared to known jigs and is of modular construction The jig 10 comprises a femur-specific sizing assembly 15 which also forms a femoral trial implant, rather than requiring a separate trial femoral implant as used in conventional kits, an integral femur-specific cutting guide 16, a tibial sizing assembly 20 and a tibial cutting guide 22.
As shown particularly in
A femoral sizing plate 17, for use before the jig 10, is shown in
The tibial cutting guide 22 is shown in more detail in
The jig 10's femur-specific cutting and sizing assembly 15, and femur-specific cutting guide 18, are shown in more detail in
Also shown is a tibial backplate 40, which is fixed to the cut upper surface of the tibia 40, by pins (again not shown) and which can be attached to a reamer cutting portion left in the tibia. The tibial backplate 40 is shaped to receive and support a tibial implant 42 (as shown in detail in
Only two sizes of tibial and femoral backplate are provided in the kit. Platelet size A is used for implant sizes 1, 2, 3. Platelet size B is used for implant sizes 3, 4, 5. This is another reduction in the number of components required compared to conventional kits.
Together the tibial cutting assembly, the detachable upper femoral cutting guide assembly 46, and the femoral cutting and sizing assembly 15's cutting slots e.g. 35, 37 provide guides for all major cuts required in secondary knee replacement surgery.
A kit for replacement knee surgery is constituted by core components: a jig 10: a two femoral backplates 33 of different sizes and two tibial backplates 40; two reamers, femoral and tibial reaming guides, a femoral sizing plate 17, a tibial measuring device 70, a selection of suitable final femoral and tibial implants and adaptors for connecting the stems. The kit can advantageously be contained in a suitable standard instrument box (either 518×244×114 (mm); 518×244×76 (mm); or 230×244×76 (mm) for storage, handling and sterilising.
Methods of secondary knee replacement surgery using the previously described components of the kit of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, using the same reference numbers to denote features as before.
The surgery is performed on a patient who has previously had a knee replacement. Accordingly the lower end of the femur has been shaped during previous surgery leaving a flat lower surface and chamfered ends to the femur. The tibia has also been cut at its upper end to form a plateau, but there may have been degradation of this plateau.
In a first step, a central channel is reamed out in the femur using the reamer of
In a second reaming step, a channel is reamed in the tibia, using a different reamer. The handle of the reamer is then removed leaving the reaming portion and shaft of the reamer in situ.
The tibial cutting guide 22 is then fixed to the tibia 14 by conventional pins inserted through holes (e.g. 24, 26) in the cutting guide body. The collar 32 of the cutting guide 22 is fitted about the shaft of the reamer in a channel reamed in the tibia 14 to stabilise the guide when cutting. The slots (e.g. 28, 30) of the tibia-specific cutting guide are used to guide a surgical saw to make a flat reference, 4° slope tibial plane, thus creating a fresh tibial plateau.
Having determined the appropriate sizes of femoral and tibial implants, the femur-specific sizing assembly 15 which replicates or forms a femoral trial implant is fitted to an appropriately sized i.e having the previously determined size, femoral backplate 33.
Similarly, an appropriately sized tibial implant is selected from the kit and fitted to the tibial backplate.
Both the femoral and tibial components are in turn mounted over reamer reaming portions 96 left in channels as described above.
This results in the femoral and tibial components being connected to form an artificial knee joint provided by the jig 10.
The position of the femoral sizing assembly 15 can be adjusted sideways in the medial-lateral directions only to allow for femoral offset. In practice, this functionality simplifies the components of the cutting and sizing jig enhancing surgical efficiency.
The femoral sizing assembly is then expanded to the previously determined femoral implant size, by operation of the screw at 34 until the markings shown in particular in
The jig 10 is further fixed to the femur and tibia by pinning through the pin guides 38,44 which are slidable on arms extending from the respective backplates.
The patella support unit 62 is mounted on an artificial trochlea 64 fixed to the femoral assembly 15, allowing the surgeon to model the patella's path with the final implants throughout the joint line determination and balancing.
The surgeon then mounts the femoral and tibial rulers 11,13 in place on the femoral and tibial sizing assemblies and rotates their oval bases to set the stems at a correct distance from the femur and tibia respectively. The femoral ruler can be adjusted to verify the position of the femoral insertion of the medial collateral ligament. The screw at 34 can be operated to extend or withdraw the femoral sizing assembly 15 to adjust the position of the joint line as required to optimise joint line location.
The tibial implant 42 can be moved up or down by operation of a screw 45, and the joint manipulated by the surgeon to adjust the ligament balance. The height required for the tibial implant can be determined by use of the tibial ruler 13, the lower plane of the arm 44A corresponding to the plane of the tibial plateau.
Posterior offset can also be determined at this stage, adjusting the screw on the assembly 15 as required.
Posterior augment cuts are then made in the femur as required using the guide slots e.g. 35 in the femoral sizing assembly 15.
The additional separable upper femoral cutting guide assembly 46, which is a feature of the modular sizing and cutting jig of the invention, is fitted to the upper portion of the femur-specific cutting and sizing assembly 15 and pinned with parallel pins to the femur 12. An anterior chamfer cut can then be made using the guides e.g 50. The assembly can then be pinned with oblique pins and any augment cuts made.
The detachable front portion 58 is then removed along with the remainder of the femoral sizing assembly, leaving just the upper femoral cutting guide assembly 46 pinned to the femur. Any box cuts can be made easily by the surgeon, the modularity of the jig allowing only the necessary separable upper femoral cutting guide assembly 46 in place pinned to the femur, thus maximising the surgeon's freedom to operate.
The tibial cutting guide 22 is held in relation to the tibia by the arm 43 extending from the tibial backplate (for example in the configuration shown in
To determine any tibial offset required the surgeon connects a reamer to the tibial measuring device 70, and places it on top of the tibial plane. The device is operated to slide the plate 74 over the base 72 until a satisfactory coverage of the tibia is achieved.
The surgeon reads the offset length and the angle on the markings 78 and 76. The surgeon marks the position of the base 72 using a bistoury in the four peripheral notches before removing the device 70.
If an offset is needed, the surgeon aligns the tibial offset reaming guide 80 so that its peripheral notches align with the marks made above, pins the guide 80 to the bone and deepens the reaming done in the previous steps as required for component fit.
Lodges can be cut at this time in the tibial surface to provide room for any tibial keel.
Final femoral and tibial implants can be fitted with any final augments as required. The resulting (augmented) implants are then mounted on neutral (i.e. coaxial with the stem) or offset adaptors as required fixed to the femoral and tibial stems provided by the reaming portions left in situ in the femur and tibia respectively. The stems may be cemented. The femoral and tibial constructs may be hammered in place.
The embodiments of the invention described in this patent specification may be altered within the scope or spirit of the invention, for example by replacing components or features with technical or functional equivalents. The use of reference numerals in the specification and claims is for ease of intelligibility only and does not limit the scope of the claims in any way.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
17173594.7 | May 2017 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/064042 | 5/29/2018 | WO | 00 |