The present invention relates to medical orientation and positioning devices and in particular to a device for orienting surgical instruments, implements, implants, prosthetics, and anatomical structures.
Correct positioning of surgical instruments and implants, used in a surgical procedure, with respect to the patient's anatomy is often an important factor in achieving a successful outcome. In certain orthopaedic implant procedures, such as totals hip replacement (THR) or arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty (TKA), high tibial osteotomy (HTO), and total shoulder replacement (TSR), for example, the optimal orientation of the surgical implant enhances initial function and the long term operability of the implant. A misaligned acetabular prosthetic socket, for example, can lead to complications such as dislocation of the hip joint, decreased joint motion, joint pain, and hastened failure of the implant.
Obtaining satisfactory orientation and positioning of a prosthetic implant is often a challenging task for orthopaedic surgeons. Currently, one technique for orientation and positioning is accomplished using purely mechanical instruments and procedures based on anatomical landmarks. For example, the desired anteversion for an acetabular cup prosthesis within an acetabulum is accomplished by using external landmarks associated with a patient's pelvis. These methods, however, are subject to misalignment caused by variations in these external landmarks. These variations can be caused, for example, by failing to orient the patient's pelvis in the assumed neutral position on the operating table. Other orientation and positioning techniques involve sophisticated computer imaging systems, which are typically expensive and complicated to use.
In addition, traditional patient alignment and stabilization techniques neither achieve nor maintain rigid patient orientation required for use of mechanical acetabular alignment guides. The uncertainty of actual patient orientation imparts error in placement of the prosthetic implant.
There is thus a need in the art for an improved system and method for obtaining accurate orientation of surgical instruments and implants during various orthopaedic repair and replacement procedures. There is a further need for a device that is simple and easy to operate.
The present invention, in one embodiment, is a system for aligning a medical prosthesis with an anatomical feature on a patient's body. An initial position of the anatomical feature establishes a reference position. The system includes a surgical instrument for supporting the medical prosthesis, a first measuring device attached to the patient's body for measuring positional changes of the anatomical feature relative to the reference position, a communication channel, and a second measuring device attached to the surgical instrument for measuring positional changes of the surgical instrument relative to the anatomical feature. The two measuring devices are operatively coupled together via the communication channel. The second measuring device is capable of measuring and displaying positional changes of the surgical instrument relative to the anatomical feature based on the anatomical positional changes and the surgical instrument positional changes.
The present invention, in another embodiment, is a system for assisting a surgeon in obtaining a correct orientation of an acetabular prosthetic socket in a patient's acetabulum during a total hip arthroplasty procedure. An initial position of the acetabulum establishes a reference position. The system includes a support shaft for supporting the acetabular prosthetic socket, a first measuring device attached to the patient's pelvic area for measuring acetabulum positional changes relative to the reference position, a second measuring device attached to the surgical instrument for measuring surgical instrument positional changes relative to the reference position, and a communication channel that operatively couples the first and second measuring devices. The second measuring device is capable of generating and displaying surgical instrument positional changes relative to the acetabulum based on the acetabulum positional changes and the surgical instrument positional changes relative to the reference position.
The present invention, in yet another embodiment, is a method of positioning a medical prosthesis with respect to an anatomical feature of a patient. The method includes providing a surgical instrument adapted to support the medical prosthesis or an alignment guide, and identifying a first position of the surgical instrument relative to the anatomical feature, coupling a first measuring device for measuring first positional changes to the surgical instrument in the first position and zeroing the first measuring device, attaching the first measuring device to the patient near the anatomical feature, coupling a second measuring device for measuring second positional changes to the surgical instrument in the first position and zeroing the second measuring device, and determining the relative position of the second measuring device to the anatomical feature, based on the first positional changes and the second positional changes.
While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modifications in various obvious aspects, all without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail below. The intention, however, is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The housing 12 contains the electronic circuitry and components necessary for device operation. The housing 12 may be made from any material suitable for use within a surgical field or patient treatment setting. The device 12 may be either disposable or reusable.
The displays 18, in the embodiment shown in
In one embodiment, the device 10 further includes attachment straps 28 connected to the housing 12. The straps 28 are configured to allow attachment of the device 10 to a surgical instrument, implant, or prosthetic device. In one embodiment, the straps 28 are replaced with clips adapted for coupling with one or more surgical instruments. The device 10 may be transferable from instrument to instrument within an implant system or systems, or may be dedicated for use with one instrument. In one embodiment, further discussed below, the device 10 may in addition or in the alternative include sensors and displays for providing linear positioning information. Also, the device 10 may include only one or two of the ROLL, PITCH, and YAW displays 18 and the related circuitry.
In one embodiment, the device includes the sensors, further described below, for providing position and orientation signals. The sensor, for example, may be directly integrated into the body of the housing 12 or mounted onto the body of the housing 12. The sensors may be adhered to the housing 12, located inside the housing 12, or fabricated directly on the surface of the housing 12, for example, by depositing a layer of silicon on the housing 12 by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) or sputtering, and then building the devices in this silicon layer using techniques common to or derived from the art of semiconductor or MEMS processing.
In another embodiment, the device 10 is adapted to receive orientation and positioning signals from sensors located in an external device. The device 10 may have receptacles for attachment to such an external device through direct cable or wireless communication capabilities such as RF and IR. In that embodiment, such an external device is attached to the surgical instrument or prosthetic, and the device 10 is used by the surgeon as an interface. In one such embodiment, the sensor is connected, via wireless and/or wired connections, to a computer or other electronic instrument, which may record or display the sensor measurements (e.g., temperature), and which may at least partially control or evaluate the sensor. For example, an auxiliary computer or other electronic instrument may at least partially control the sensor by, for example, performing sensor calibration, performing real-time statistical analysis on the data from the sensor, or running error detection and correction algorithms on the data from the sensor.
In one embodiment, the device 10 includes communication capabilities for interacting with other equipment, for example, a computer generated image recreation system. It may, for example, be incorporated for use with computer aided surgical navigation systems, such as VectorVision available from BrainLab, Inc. of Germany, OrthoPilot, available from Aesculap, Inc. of Germany, HipNav, available from Casurgica, Inc., of Pittsburgh, PA, and Navitrack, available from Orthosoft-Centerpulse Orthopedics, of Austin, TX In one such embodiment, data received from a sensor may be used by the computer system to control and/or modify a position of an implant. The computer or other electronic instrument may be configured to activate the appropriate controls or devices as necessary based on the data received from the sensor. Manual adjustments may also be made in response to the data received from the sensor. In another such embodiment, data from the sensor can be used in a feedback loop with positioning elements (either directly, via a computer or other electronic instrument, or by manual control) to maintain a desired property, such as an orientation or position.
Upon attachment of the device 10 to a surgical instrument, an operator, such as a surgeon for example, can use the device 10 to obtain three-dimensional orientation information. This combination of the device 10 with a surgical instrument is useful for assisting surgical procedures wherein one anatomical part is desirably aligned with another anatomical part. For example, when a limb-to-torso joint replacement is to be performed (e.g., THR or TSR), it is desirable to orient an implant (such as an acetabular cup) with the anatomical part within which it is to be implanted (such as the acetabulum) so that the implant will be properly positioned. For THR, the acetabular cup is desirably aligned with respect to the plane of the acetabulum. The present invention allows a surgeon to establish a reference plane corresponding to the plane of the acetabulum by positioning the device to physically align the device with the plane of the acetabulum and then zeroing the display when the device is aligned with the plane of the acetabulum to establish the reference plane. From then on, the device provides three dimensional angular information (ROLL, PITCH, and YAW) to the surgeon as the device is moved angularly with respect to the reference plane. Additionally, the device 10 of the present invention may be used by a surgeon to identify and measure movement of a patient's body during a surgical procedure such as, for example, a total or partial hip or knee replacement. Monitoring and measuring patient movement during such procedures aids in implanting prosthetic devices in a desired orientation.
Referring to
Referring now to
For this channel, the RATE SENSOR 32 is preferably a MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical systems) device that provides angular rate of change information to a SWITCH block 44 and a MOTION DETECTOR AND DELAY block 46. SWITCH block 44 receives command information from the MOTION DETECTOR AND DELAY block 46 and directs the rate of change information to either an INTEGRATOR block 48 or an AVERAGER block 50. A ZERO block 52 permits resetting the INTEGRATOR 48 to a zero output in a manner to be described.
Referring now also to
An OVERRANGE DETECTOR block 62 monitors whether the output of the INTEGRATOR block 48 reaches an OVERRANGE condition (corresponding to an angular position beyond which the system 30 is able to measure). An OVERRATE DETECTOR block 64 monitors the output of RATE SENSOR block 32 and provides an ERROR indication if the rate exceeds that which the system 30 is able to measure. Each of the blocks 62 and 64 are coupled to an ERROR LATCH block 66 which retains the ERROR condition (whether related to range or rate or both) until reset by the ZERO block 52. A STARTUP CONTROL block 70 monitors a POWER SUPPLY block 72 and the MOTION HOLD-ON DELAY block 58 and provides a WAIT/READY signal at a RUN indicator 22. A LOW BATTERY DETECTOR block 74 is connected to the POWER SUPPLY 72 and controls a LOW BATTERY indicator 24.
Referring now to
ROLL sensor 32 (and the PITCH and YAW sensors) are each preferably an ADXRS150 150 degree/second angular rate sensor (gyroscope) on a single chip, in a MEMS technology, available from Analog Devices, One Technology Way, P.O. Box 9106, Norwood, MA 02062-9106. It is to be understood that the ROLL, PITCH, and YAW sensors are mounted in a conventional orthogonal 3-dimensional (x-y-z) orientation. Each sensor produces an output voltage RATEOUT that is proportional to the angular rate of rotation of that respective sensor. The output voltage is nominally 2.5 volts for zero rotation. The zero rotation output (or NULL) voltage varies from device to device, and with time and with temperature. The RATEOUT voltage varies above and below NULL for positive and negative rotational movement, respectively. The RATEOUT scale factor is typically 12.5 millivolts per degree per second with a full scale corresponding to 150 degrees per second. The ROLL sensor RATEOUT signal is also identified as a ROLL RATE signal. It is to be understood that each sensor responds in one plane only, and hence three separate sensors are mounted orthogonally to each other to achieve response in all three conventional mutually perpendicular (x, y, and z) axes.
The variation in sensor NULL voltage and the requirement to accurately process small rates of rotation make it desirable to establish an automatically self adjusting NULL reference. When the system is not physically rotating about any of the three x, y, z axes, the RATEOUT signal is connected through SWITCH block 44 to a low pass filter to produce an averaged representation of the RATEOUT voltage. This is the NULL voltage and it adjusts over time to sensor variations. When angular motion is detected in one or more of the three x, y, z axes, the SWITCH block (in response to an INTEGRATE signal [on line 140] from block 58, see
At this time, since the input to the AVERAGER 50 is open circuited, the AVERAGER circuit 50 then enters a “hold” mode and retains the most recent previous NULL voltage, using that NULL voltage as a reference throughout the duration of the motion. The ROLL channel 42 NULL voltage is buffered by an operational amplifier 88 and delivered as a ROLL S/H signal. The operational amplifier integrated circuits 88 in the INTEGRATOR and AVERAGER circuits 48 and 50 are preferably AD8606 type op amps, available from Analog Devices. AVERAGER circuit 50 uses a low pass filter made up of a 2 MEG ohm resistor 90 and a 0.47 microfarad capacitor 92, resulting in a time constant of one second, which has been found to work well. However, it is to be understood that other part values and other time constants may be used, while still remaining within the scope of the present invention. The capacitor 92 preferably has a low leakage and low dissipation factor.
Angular position is the time integral of rotation rate. When motion is detected, the SWITCH block transfers the RATEOUT signal to the INTEGRATOR circuit 48 to compute angular position. The output of the ROLL INTEGRATOR 48 is available as a ROLL INT signal. INTEGRATOR circuit 48 uses a 2.7 MEG ohm resistor 94 and a 0.47 microfarad capacitor 96 to perform the integration. The reference for the integration is the no-motion NULL voltage for that channel. The capacitor 96 preferably has low leakage and a low dissipation factor. The integrating resistor 94 in conjunction with capacitor 96 provides a full scale range of over +120 degrees.
The INTEGRATOR 48 is reset to zero by discharging the capacitor 96. When the ZERO button 20 is depressed, relay 116 is energized by the ZERO signal on terminal 118 (see
Referring now most particularly to
The output of the ROLL INTEGRATOR circuit 48 is sent to another window comparator made up of integrated circuit comparators 98 in the ROLL portion or channel of OVERRANGE circuit 62. When the INTEGRATOR circuit output (ROLL INT) exceeds a predetermined threshold, the ROLL channel portion of circuit 62 determines that the system is in an OVERRANGE error condition. The threshold is set at approximately 120 degrees by a tap on the voltage divider string 122. The twelve comparators in circuits 62 and 64 have open collector outputs. The six OVERRATE outputs (including the ROLL OVERATE output at terminal 100) together with the six OVERRANGE outputs (including the ROLL OVERRANGE output at terminal 102) are connected together. Both terminals 100 and 102 (i.e., all twelve comparator outputs) are connected to terminal 104 in the ERROR LATCH circuit 66 (see
Comparators 98 in the MOTION DETECTOR circuit 56 compare the output of the ROLL rate sensor 32 to a fixed level and provide a MOTION signal representative of whether the ROLL rate sensor 32 has experienced motion or not. When rotational motion is detected, the RATEOUT signal deviates from the NULL or no-motion voltage. The RATEOUT signal is sent to a “window” comparator made up of comparators 98 in the MOTION DETECTOR circuit 56. When the RATEOUT signal deviates from the NULL voltage by a predetermined amount or threshold (either positive or negative) the window comparator detects rotational motion. A threshold of one degree per second has been found to be preferable, but it is to be understood to be within the scope of the present invention to use other values, in the alternative.
A tap on a voltage divider string 122 sets the ROLL comparator MOTION thresholds. The divider 122 is connected between +5 A 124 and circuit common 126, with the center point connected to the NULL voltage (ROLL S/H) line 128. This provides that the thresholds are referenced to the NULL voltage and compensates for drift and device-to-device variations in the NULL voltage. The MOTION signal appears on terminal 106 in MOTION DETECTOR circuit 56 and is connected to corresponding MOTION terminal 106 in the MOTION HOLD-ON DELAY circuit 58 (see
Referring now also to
Comparator 134 is preferably a type LM393. When the INTEGRATE line 140 goes LOW, the relay 60 in SWITCH block 44 transfers the system from “average” mode to “integrate” mode. A pair of 143 K ohm resistors 142 and 144 set the threshold voltage for comparator 134 and a 100 K ohm resistor 146 provides hysteresis.
When the angular movement stops, the RATEOUT signal returns to the NULL voltage. The window comparators return to the open-collector state, allowing the capacitor 130 to slowly charge through a 1 MEG ohm resistor 148. The system 30 remains in the “integrate” mode until capacitor 130 charges sufficiently to switch comparator 134, which is approximately 0.7 seconds. This allows the system 30 to register any small movements the operator may make at the end of a gross movement. Such small movements may not otherwise be enough to activate the MOTION DETECTOR circuit 56.
After the 0.7 second delay, comparator 134 switches and the INTEGRATE line goes HIGH, terminating the “integrate” mode. At this point the relay 60 releases and the mechanical shock of the release is sensed by at least one of the sensors causing a noise output on one or more RATEOUT lines. This noise output can be large enough to retrigger the MOTION DETECTOR circuit 56, resulting in continuous cycling of relay 60. Such undesirable cycling is prevented by resistor 132 delaying discharge of capacitor 130 until the transient noise caused by the relay release has passed. Alternatively, relay 60 may be shock mounted.
Referring now again to
An LM 393 type comparator 172 generates a master reset pulse. The pulse is active LOW, with a pulse width of approximately 0.6 seconds, determined by a 1 microfarad capacitor 174 and a 475K ohm resistor 176. The pulse width is selected to be long enough to fully discharge a 10 microfarad capacitor 178 (through a diode 180 and a 1K ohm resistor 182) and at least partially discharge a 390 microfarad capacitor 184 (through a diode 186 and a 1K ohm resistor 188). The discharge of capacitors 178 and 184 is necessary to handle the situation where the system 30 is turned OFF and then immediately turned ON again. A 1N5817 type diode 190 protects comparator 172 and quickly discharges capacitor 174 on power down. A 15.0K ohm resistor 192 and a 34.8K ohm resistor 194 provide the reference voltage for comparator 172, and a 475K ohm resistor 196 provides hysteresis.
The master reset pulse also clears a WAIT/READY flip flop 198, which is preferably a 74HC74 type D flip flop. Flip flop 198 is cleared during the warm-up or WAIT period and is SET when the system 30 enters the READY state. Flip flop 198 drives the RUN indicator 22, which is preferably a yellow/green two color LED driven differentially by the Q and Q-not outputs at pins 5 and 6 of the device 198. Indicator 22 is preferably illuminated YELLOW during the WAIT or warm-up period, and switches to a GREEN illumination when the system enters the READY mode. A 392 ohm resistor 200 provides current limiting for the RUN indicator 22.
A 10K ohm resistor 202 connected to the Q output (pin 5) of flip flop 198 provides an input to the FET transistor 138 which serves as a relay driver for relay 60. When the system is in the WAIT mode or warm-up period, the input provided through resistor 202 forces the system to the AVERAGE mode by connecting the sensors to the AVERAGER amplifiers, since the Q output remains LOW during the warm-up period.
An LM 393 comparator 204 is the warm-up timer. A 221K ohm resistor 206 and capacitor 184 set the duration of the warm-up period. At the end of the warm-up period, the output (at pin 7) of comparator 204 goes to an open collector condition. This clocks the WAIT/READY flip flop 198 into the READY state, provided that 10 seconds have elapsed with no motion at the end of the warm-up period.
The 10 second “no-motion” requirement is enforced by a 10 second timer, which uses an LM 393 type comparator 208. The 10 second timer monitors the MOTION signal on line 106 (buffered through another LM 393 type comparator 210). If any of the sensors detect motion, capacitor 178 will be held discharged by comparator 210 acting through a diode 212 and a 475 ohm resistor 214. When none of the sensors detect motion, capacitor 178 will begin to charge through a 1.00 MEG ohm resistor 216. If no motion is detected for 10 seconds, the output (at pin 1) of comparator 208 will go to an OPEN condition, releasing the CLOCK input (at pin 3) of flip flop 198. The result is that the WAIT/READY flip flop is SET only after both the warm-up period has elapsed, and the system 30 has not detected motion for 10 seconds.
The POWER SUPPLY circuit 72 utilizes two integrated circuit voltage regulators 110 preferably LM2931 type, available from National Semiconductor Corporation. Regulators 110 and 112 each provide regulated +5 volts DC power to the various circuits shown. Regulator 110 provides power to digital circuits in system 30 (indicated by “+5D”) and regulator 112 provides power to the analog circuits (particularly amplifiers 88, as indicated by “+5 A). The sensors, (including ROLL sensor 32) require both analog and digital power. Separate analog and digital circuit common paths or “ground” traces are used to segregate analog and digital power supply currents, with the exception that only the analog ground is taken to the printed circuit board(s) (not shown) on which the sensors are mounted, because the digital currents are low in the sensors. A 9 volt battery 272 (see
An LM393 type comparator 154 is used for the LOW BATTERY DETECTOR 74. When the battery voltage drops below approximately 6.8 volts, comparator 154 switches, driving the signal on the BATLOW 2 terminal 156 LOW, turning on the BATTERY LOW indicator 24, which is preferably a red LED. The LED is supplied through a 392 ohm resistor 158. A precision voltage reference diode 160 sets a reference voltage at the “−” input (pin 2) of comparator 154 to 1.2 volts. A 100K ohm resistor 162 and a 21.5K ohm resistor 164 set the voltage at the “+” input (pin 3) of comparator 154 to 1.2 volts when the battery voltage is 6.8 volts. A 10 microfarad capacitor 166 delays the rise of the reference voltage at pin 2 of comparator 154 to force the comparator output voltage at the BATLOW 2 terminal 156 HIGH at power on. A diode 168 and a 57.6K ohm resistor 170 provide hysteresis to lock the output 156 in a LOW state once a low battery condition is detected. This prevents the BATTERY LOW indicator 24 from cycling ON and OFF in response to changing current demands on the battery 272, causing the battery voltage to fluctuate above and below 6.8 volts.
When the system 30 detects motion, the user is given visual feedback by flickering the RUN indicator 22 with GREEN illumination. NAND gates 232 and 234 (also type CD4093) form a square wave oscillator with a period of about 50 milliseconds. When motion is detected, the oscillator is enabled by comparator 134 releasing the input at pin 1 of gate 232 to go HIGH. The oscillator output (at pin 4 of gate 234) drives an IRFD 110 type FET transistor 236. When transistor 236 is ON, it increases the current in the RUN indicator LED 22 by providing a path to circuit common through a 392 ohm resistor 238. The transistor 236 is turned ON and OFF every 50 milliseconds while the system senses motion, providing a visually perceptible feedback or indication to the user that the system 30 is sensing motion.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
It is to be understood that the ROLL, PITCH, and YAW data (either in analog or digital form) may be delivered to other circuitry and systems (not shown) in addition to (or as an alternative to) the DISPLAY block 40. For example, the digital data representing the final ROLL, PITCH, and YAW angle selected with respect to the reference plane may be recorded by a data logger (not shown) if desired. Furthermore, it is to be understood that data may be provided in serial form as well as in parallel form, using conventional circuitry to produce serial digital data from either the analog values or parallel digital values.
Referring now to
In the embodiment of the present invention including accelerometers, the device 10 can be utilized independently or in conjunction with gyroscopes or other sensors to provide three dimensional positional orientation with or without angular change for applications such as osteotomies, placing screws in the pedicle, bone cuts/preparation during total joint arthroplasties, disc replacement, and position of tunnels for ligament and tendon repairs. One sensor useful as an accelerometer, either in combination with the gyroscopic sensors, or independently, is an Analog Devices type ADXL103 accelerometer, which may be used in place of device 32 to detect linear acceleration which is then integrated to obtain linear position (which may be replicated in three orthogonal channels along x, y and z axes). With the ADXL103 type devices, it is believed preferable to include the motion sensing and averaging aspects shown and described herein, to remove device-to-device errors, as is done with the gyroscopic type rate sensors. It is to be understood that if an accelerometer is used to obtain linear position information, two integrations (from acceleration to velocity to position) are needed.
In another embodiment, the device 10 further includes additional sensors such as temperature, ultrasonic, and pressure sensors, for measuring properties of biological tissue and other materials used in the practice of medicine or surgery, including determining the hardness, rigidity, and/or density of materials, and/or determining the flow and/or viscosity of substances in the materials, and/or determining the temperature of tissues or substances within materials. Specifically these additional sensors can, for example, identify the margins between cortical and cancellous bone, determine the thickness of cancellous bone, monitor temperature of cement for fixating implants, and differentiate between nucleus pulposis and annulus of a spinal disc. Also, these sensors can identify cracks/fractures in bone during placement of implants such as pedicle screw placement, screw fixation in bone, femoral implant during THA, and identify tissue-nerve margins to determine proximity of nerves.
As shown in
As further shown, the arms 320 include an inner arm 326 and an outer arm 328, which are coupled to each other such that the outer arms 328 can telescope or extend with respect to the inner arms 326. This telescoping action allows the surgeon to adjust the length of the arms 320, based on the diameter of a particular patient's acetabulum. In another embodiment, the arms 320 are made from a unitary piece and thus are not amenable to a length adjustment. The distal ends of the arms 320 define an outer diameter of the alignment guide 308. The arms 320, in one embodiment, have a length of from about 40 to about 70 mm, with each arm 320 having the same length. The length of the arms is driven by the diameter of a particular patient's acetabulum, such that the outer diameter of the alignment guide is slightly larger (e.g., 1-3 mm) than the diameter of the acetabulum. In various exemplary embodiments, the arms 320 have a length of 48, 52, 56, 60, or 64 mm. In one embodiment, the arms 320 have a width of from about 2 to about 5 mm and a thickness of from about 1 to about 3 mm. In one exemplary embodiment, the arms have a width of about 3.5 mm and a thickness of about 2 mm.
According to one embodiment, as described above, the arms 320 are adjusted in length by the surgeon using a telescoping action. In another embodiment, the surgeon may need to pivot the arms 320 to avoid an osteophyte or other surface aberration on the rim 352 of the acetabulum 354. Once the alignment guide 308 is correctly positioned on the rim 352 of the acetabulum, the surgeon depresses the zero button 20 to set the reference plane (block 378).
After zeroing the device 10, the surgeon removes the instrument 300 from the surgical patient's body. The alignment guide is then removed and the ball support 360 and prosthetic socket 362 are attached to the support shaft 304 (block 380). The surgeon then places the prosthetic socket 362 into the acetabulum 354 using the instrument 300 (block 382). The surgeon then manipulates the orientation of the prosthetic socket 362 in the acetabulum 354 using the instrument 300, until the device 10 indicates the desired orientation (block 384). In one embodiment, for example, the surgeon manipulates the instrument 300 until the displays 18 on the device indicate an anteversion of 25 degrees. In this embodiment, the ROLL display 18a indicates “25” and the PITCH display 18b and YAW display 18c indicate zero. Next the prosthetic socket 362 is secured to the acetabulum 354 (block 386).
In other embodiments, the device 10 is used on other acetabular instruments to identify the orientation of the instrument with respect to a previously set plane of the acetabulum. When the implant is in the neutral position the information provided by the device may, for example, be in the form of angular measurements to identify information such as rotation, abduction and version angles. In the embodiment of the present invention that includes accelerometers or other sensors for providing linear positioning information, the device 10 also provides information on position changes in linear dimensions to identify properties such as depth of insertion and changes in center of rotation. The instrument 300, including the device 10 is capable of sub-millimeter and sub-degree accuracy to monitor the position and angle with reference to the pelvis. It can provide continuous measurements of cup abduction and flexion angles. These angles may be provided during placement of the preparation instruments, the insertion of the implant, after it is placed and, if needed, after placement of supplementary screws.
The femoral alignment guide 430 is used to align the femoral implant by referencing the lesser and greater trochanter of the proximal end of the femur. The guide 430 can also be used to mark the lesser or greater trochanter, or any other point marked by the surgeon, to fix the predetermined/measured angle of the preparation instruments or implant. The surgeon may then move the femur without disrupting his measurement of the chosen anteversion. In one embodiment, the guide 430 is attached to a femoral broaching instrument. The guide 430 is placed at the desired angle and the device 20 is set to zero. For example, the guide 430, in one embodiment, is generally aligned with a center of the greater trochanter 418 and the lesser trochanter 422. The surgeon then turns the instrument 400 to the desired anteversion (e.g., 10 degrees), by using the ROLL display 18a of the device 10. The surgeon then loosens the guide 430, rotates it such that the arms 434 and 436 are again generally aligned with the greater trochanter 418 and the lesser trochanter 422, and secures the guide 430 to the handle 404. The surgeon then drives the instrument 400 into the canal at this orientation and repeats this procedure with a larger broach 408, as needed, using the guide 430 to achieve the desired alignment.
The present invention is also useful in assisting a surgeon with a TSR procedure. In a shoulder replacement, one of the steps is placing a glenoid implant into the glenoid of the patient's scapula. One such glenoid implant is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,679,916, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Another step of the TSR procedure is placement of the humeral implant. The device 10 of the present invention is useful for assisting a surgeon in achieving proper orientation of the glenoid implant with respect to the glenoid vault and for achieving proper orientation of the humeral implant. The device 10, for example, can be attached to a T-handle or a drill commonly used by the surgeon with the glenoid planer. The device 10, in further embodiment, can be attached to a tapered reamer used for reaming the humeral canal or to a humeral head cutting guide.
In yet another embodiment, the device 10 is used by a surgeon to facilitate TKA. For TKA, the device 10 may be affixed to the initial guides commonly used by surgeons, to enable more accurate alignment than that provided by the existing guides. In various exemplary embodiments, the device 10 can be affixed to the cutting blocks to provide more accurate rotational alignment, varus/valgus alignment, and level of resection. The device 10 can also be affixed to any other instruments known in the art and commonly employed in a TKA procedure.
In another embodiment of the present invention, one device 10 is coupled to a surgical instrument and a second device 10 or other navigation aid or device is attached to a selected location on a patient's body to form a surgical navigation system. The device 10 attached to the patient's body operates to track and display patient movement, if any, during the surgical procedure to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of the alignment and placement of the prosthetic device. If there is movement of the patient such that the benchmark position and thus the orientation of the prosthetic implant would be inaccurate if based solely on the navigation device 10 attached to the surgical implant instrument, the navigation device attached to the patient's body will track this movement and the surgeon can adjust his target orientation appropriately. For example, during a THA procedure, the navigation device attached to the surgical instrument, after being zeroed, operates to register any changes to the position of the prosthetic implant, such as rotation, abduction and anteversion, relative to a benchmark, or reference, acetabular plane in space. At the same time, the navigation device 10 attached to the patient's body, e.g., on the pelvic bone, will, after being zeroed in the same, or substantially the same, position and orientation as the device 10 attached to the surgical instrument, track any movement of the patient's body, and hence, the patient's actual acetabular plane, relative to the reference acetabular plane.
The two navigation devices may, in one embodiment, be operatively connected via a communication channel, which may be wired (e.g., a cable), or wireless (e.g., radio-frequency or infrared). In one embodiment, the two navigation devices are not so connected. In still other embodiments, one or both of the navigation devices may be operatively connected to an external computer or other electronic equipment such as, for example, a computer-aided surgical navigation system as described above.
For clarification purposes, in the following discussions, the terms “reference acetabular plane” and “reference plane of the acetabulum” refer to the plane in space defined by the patient's acetabular rim at the time the two devices of the navigation system are zeroed. The location and position of the “reference plane of the acetabulum” is fixed at the time the navigation devices are zeroed, and remains constant throughout the surgical procedure. In contrast, the terms “actual acetabular plane” and “actual plane of the acetabulum,” as used herein, refer to the plane in space defined by the patient's acetabular rim at any given time. Thus, the location and position of the “actual acetabular plane” will change as the patient moves. The term “position” may refer to linear position, angular orientation, or both.
The docking mechanism 610 is generally of a size and shape to mate with the body orientation device 10b, and may be similar to the attachment base 332 shown in
In one embodiment, the communication channel 620 may be a cable. Alternatively, the communication channel 620 may be any wireless communication path utilizing infrared or radio-frequency telemetry, as are well known in the art. The communication channel 620 operates to permit data transfer between the devices 10a and 10b during use.
The two navigation devices 10a and 10b are not required to be of the same type or have the same functionality. For example, in one embodiment, the instrument orientation device 10a includes a processor for performing data processing necessary to automatically adjust the orientation of the instrument 300 to compensate for movement, if any, of the patient as detected and measured by the body orientation device 10b. In another embodiment, the body orientation device 10b may include a light or audible tone to indicate when patient movement may have occurred. In embodiments where the two devices 10a and 10b are connected via a communication channel, the body orientation device 10b need not include a display. Rather, in such embodiments, the body orientation device 10b may include only a sensor array package, which may include minimal electronics (e.g., circuitry to reset or zero the sensor output, transmitters) and the means (e.g., data port, RF or IR transceiver) to be operatively coupled to another device. In still another embodiment, the instrument orientation device 10a may include a peripheral sensor array attached to the patient's body. This sensor array is capable of transmitting (via wired or wireless communication channel) positional information to the device 10a for automatic adjustment of the device display in the event of patient movement.
The body orientation device 10b measures patient movement, if any, during the surgical procedure. If such patient movement occurs, the readings on the device 10a are adjusted, such that the surgeon may orient the instrument 300 to achieve the desired orientation of the prosthesis to the patient's selected anatomical location. In one embodiment, this adjustment is accomplished automatically within the instrument orientation device 10a based on angular, and in some embodiments, linear displacement information transmitted by the body orientation device 10b via the communication channel 620. In another embodiment, the adjustment is done manually by the surgeon by comparing the displays 18 of the two devices 10a and 10b. In yet another embodiment, the surgical personnel may use the body orientation device 10b to maintain the patient in a desired position, and to adjust the patient's position as needed to re-establish the desired patient position if movement does occur.
Once the alignment guide 308 is correctly positioned on the rim 352 of the acetabulum, the surgeon depresses the zero button 20 of the body orientation device 10b (block 666) and then, with the patient completely immobilized and while holding the instrument 300 in the same position, the surgeon removes the body orientation device 10b from the instrument 300 and attaches the body orientation device 10b to the pelvic docking mechanism 610 (block 670). Then, while continuing to immobilize the patient and continuing to hold the instrument 300 in the same position, the surgeon attaches the instrument orientation device 10a to the instrument 300 and depresses the zero button 20 of the instrument orientation device 10a (block 674). In this manner, both orientation devices 10a and 10b are zeroed in the same position relative to the reference plane of the acetabulum. Accordingly, each of the devices 10a and 10b+ will subsequently measure any angular displacement it experiences relative to that reference acetabular plane.
In another embodiment, after attaching the pelvic docking mechanism 610 to the pelvic bone 350 at a predetermined location, powering on the devices 10a and 10b, attaching the attachment base 332 to the instrument 300, attaching the alignment guide 308 to the end of the support shaft 304 of the instrument 300, the surgeon then attaches the instrument orientation device 10a to the instrument 300. Then, after correctly positioning the alignment guide 308 on the rim 352 of the acetabulum, the surgeon places the body orientation device 10b adjacent to the instrument orientation device 10a and aligns the two devices 10a and 10b to the same orientation. The surgeon then zeroes both devices 10 at substantially the same time by depressing the zero button on each device. Alternatively, the system 600 may be configured to zero both devices by depressing the zero button on only one. For example, the devices 10 may be configured such that when the surgeon depresses the zero button on the instrument orientation device 10a, a reset command is sent, via the communication channel 620, to the body orientation device 10b, simultaneously zeroing the latter device.
After zeroing both devices 10a and 10b, the surgeon then attaches the body orientation device 10b to the pelvic docking mechanism 610. Under this approach, the position of the body orientation device 10b relative to the reference plane of the acetabulum will be slightly offset linearly from the position of the instrument orientation device 10a relative to the reference plane of the acetabulum, because the body orientation device 10b and instrument orientation device 10a occupy different locations in space when they are zeroed. Because of the small size and shape of the devices 10a and 10b, however, this difference in the device positions relative to the reference plane of the acetabulum does not significantly affect the performance of the orientation system 600. Alternatively, in one embodiment, an internal processor in the instrument orientation device 10a and/or the body orientation device 10b may be programmed to compensate for this offset.
The position of the body orientation device 10b on the pelvic bone 350 establishes an intermediate position for this device relative to the reference plane of the acetabulum. In one embodiment, the displays 18, if present, on the body orientation device 10b may indicate the angular displacement the body orientation device 10b experienced in being moved from its zero position to its intermediate position on the patient's pelvic bone 350. For example, if the body orientation device 10b pitched 3 degrees, rolled 5 degrees, and yawed 7 degrees in being moved by the surgeon from its zero position to the pelvic bone, the device's intermediate position as indicated on its displays 18 would be “3, 5, 7.” In another embodiment, the body orientation device 10b may include internal electronics and/or circuitry whereby its displays 18 may be reset to “0, 0, 0” by the surgeon after the device 10b is attached to the pelvic bone 350, while the device's motion sensors continue to measure movement relative to the device's original zero position. This embodiment thus provides a direct indication on the displays 18 of the body orientation device 10b of any patient movement after the device 10b is placed on the pelvic bone 350.
Once the devices 10a and 10b are zeroed and the body orientation device 10b is coupled to the pelvic bone 350, the surgeon then removes the instrument 300 from the surgical patient's body. The alignment guide is then removed and the ball support 360 and prosthetic socket 362 are attached to the support shaft 304 (block 678). The surgeon then places the prosthetic socket 362 into the acetabulum 354 using the instrument 300 (block 682). The surgeon then manipulates the orientation of the prosthetic socket 362 in the acetabulum 354 using the instrument 300, until the instrument orientation device 10a indicates the desired orientation. Any movement of the patient registered by the body orientation device 10b is used to adjust the target position of the instrument 300 and, in turn, the prosthetic socket 362 (blocks 686-694).
In one embodiment, for example, the surgeon may desire to implant the prosthetic socket with an anteversion of 25 degrees relative to the reference plane of the acetabulum. If the patient's body has moved since the devices 10a and 10b were zeroed and the body orientation device 10b was coupled to the pelvic docking mechanism 610, this movement must be taken into account when orienting the instrument 300 to the acetabulum. For example, if the body has rolled 2 degrees, pitched 2 degrees and yawed 1 degree since the devices 10a and 10b were zeroed and the body orientation device 10b was attached to the pelvic bone 350, the orientation of the instrument 300 must be adjusted accordingly to achieve the desired 25 degree anteversion.
In one embodiment, this adjustment is done manually by the surgeon by comparing the displays 18 of the two devices 10a and 10b. If the displays 18 of the body orientation device 10b were reset to zero after the device was attached to the pelvic bone 350, these displays 18 will read “2, 2, 1” after the patient has moved as described in the above example. Alternatively, if the displays 18 of the body orientation device 10b were not reset to zero after the device was attached to the pelvic bone 350, these displays will read “5, 7, 8” after the patient has moved (a change of 2 degrees ROLL, 2 degrees PITCH, and 1 degree YAW from the device's intermediate position). In both cases, the displays 18 on the instrument orientation device 10a will still read “0, 0, 0.” To achieve an anteversion of 25 degrees, the surgeon will then manipulate the instrument 300 until the displays 18 on the instrument orientation device 10a read “27, 2, 1.”
In another embodiment, the positional correction of the instrument may be accomplished automatically by an internal processor, controller, or discrete circuitry components within the instrument orientation device 10a. This processor, controller, etc. is adapted to receive as inputs values reflecting positional changes measured by the instrument orientation device 10a and the body orientation device 10b, to perform arithmetic calculations on these values, and to generate an output representing the orientation of the instrument orientation device 10a relative to the body orientation 10b. This orientation also represents, by definition, the relative orientation of the instrument 300 to the patient's actual acetabular plane. Note, however, that the sensors of the devices 10a and 10b will continue to detect and measure movement of the devices relative to the reference acetabular plane until they are zeroed by depressing the zero button 20 on each device.
In this embodiment, the instrument orientation device 10a also includes circuitry to provide multiple display modes, one of which is to display the relative orientation of the device 10a, and accordingly, the instrument 300 and the prosthetic socket 362, to the body orientation device 10b and the patient's actual acetabular plane. The device 10a may be configured to allow the surgeon to select a desired display mode by, for example, depressing a “Display Mode” button on the device (not shown), or by selecting from a menu of different display modes.
In this embodiment, after attaching the body orientation device 10b to the patient's pelvic bone 350, the surgeon sets the instrument orientation device 10a to begin displaying the orientation of the device 10a relative to the body orientation device 10b. The body orientation device 10b detects and measures any subsequent bodily movement. The processor of the instrument orientation device 10a receives values representing this bodily movement, adds the inverse of these values to any movement detected and measured by the instrument orientation device 10a, and generates an output representing the relative orientation of the instrument orientation device 10a to the body orientation device 10b.
Thus, in the above example, after the body has moved as indicated (2 degrees ROLL, 2 degrees PITCH, and 1 degree YAW), the processor of the instrument orientation device 10a receives angular values representing this movement (i.e., “2, 2, 1”). The processor then adds the inverse of these values (i.e., “−2, −2, −1”) to any movement measured by the instrument orientation device 10a. The results of this calculation are displayed on displays 18 of the instrument orientation device 10a. In this example, if no movement of the instrument orientation device 10a has occurred, the displays of the device 10a would read “−2, −2, −1.” In contrast, if the instrument 300 had moved by, for example, −2 degrees of ROLL, the displays would read “−4, −2, −1.” In either case, to achieve an anteversion of 25 degrees, the surgeon will then manipulate the instrument 300 until the displays 18 on the instrument orientation device 10a read “25, 0, 0.”
In yet another embodiment, the surgeon uses the positional information displayed on the body orientation device 10b to ensure that the patient's actual acetabular plane is in the reference position when aligning the prosthetic socket 362. For example, after the body orientation device is attached to the pelvic bone 350 and its displays 18 are reset to zero, and after the patient's body moves such that these displays 18 on device 10b read “2, 2, 1,” the surgical personnel adjust the patient's body position until these displays 18 read “0, 0, 0.” The surgical personnel will then monitor the displays 18 on the body orientation device 10b and adjust the patient's position as necessary to maintain these displays 18 at “0, 0, 0.” The surgeon then manipulates the instrument 300 until the displays 18 on the instrument orientation device 10a indicate the desired implant orientation.
The prosthetic socket 362 is then secured to the acetabulum 354 (block 698).
In one embodiment, the body orientation device 10b may include a graphic display depicting anatomic portions of the patient (e.g., pelvic bone, femur), instrument and/or bone along with the measured parameters, i.e., angle, linear movement etc. the adjustment is made automatically and can provide an indication that the patient's position has moved
With respect the instruments described above, which include sensors for providing orientation and/or position information, the sensors may include a sensor configured to make a measurement related to the at least one property at multiple locations on or in the instrument or implant. According to one embodiment, the sensor includes a plurality or an array of sensors to measure one or more properties over multiple points, angles, distance, areas, or any combination thereof.
Various modifications and additions can be made to the exemplary embodiments discussed without departing from the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the scope of the claims, together with all equivalents thereof.
The present application is a continuation from U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 15/478,516, filed Apr. 4, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,179,167, issued Nov. 23, 2021, which is continuation from U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 14/639,758, filed Mar. 5, 2015, which is a continuation from U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/295,391, filed Nov. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,467, issued Mar. 10, 2015, which is a continuation from U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 12/502,182, filed Jul. 13, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,057,479, issued Nov. 15, 2011, which is a continuation from U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 11/182,528, filed Jul. 15, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,559,931, issued Jul. 14, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. nonprovisional application Ser. No. 10/864,085 filed Jun. 9, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,057,482, issued Nov. 15, 2011, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. provisional application 60/476,998 filed Jun. 9, 2003, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3174080 | Eldon | Mar 1965 | A |
3670324 | Trevor, 3rd | Jun 1972 | A |
4349018 | Chambers | Sep 1982 | A |
4421112 | Mains et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4436099 | Raftopoulos | Mar 1984 | A |
4459985 | McKay et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4475549 | Oh | Oct 1984 | A |
4501266 | McDaniel | Feb 1985 | A |
4509393 | Castiglione | Apr 1985 | A |
4518855 | Malak | May 1985 | A |
4524766 | Petersen | Jun 1985 | A |
4529348 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4567885 | Androphy | Feb 1986 | A |
4567886 | Petersen | Feb 1986 | A |
4621630 | Kenna | Nov 1986 | A |
4646729 | Kenna | Mar 1987 | A |
4716894 | Lazzeri et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4718078 | Bleidorn et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4738253 | Buechel et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4759350 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4823807 | Russell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4938762 | Wehrli | Jul 1990 | A |
4944760 | Kenna | Jul 1990 | A |
4945799 | Knetzer | Aug 1990 | A |
4952213 | Bowman et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5002547 | Poggie et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5053037 | Lackey | Oct 1991 | A |
5065612 | Ooka et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5067821 | Young | Nov 1991 | A |
5116338 | Poggie et al. | May 1992 | A |
5122146 | Chapman et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129908 | Petersen | Jul 1992 | A |
5141512 | Farmer et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5171244 | Caspari et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5213112 | Niwa et al. | May 1993 | A |
5249581 | Horbal et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5251127 | Raab | Oct 1993 | A |
5279309 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5296855 | Matsuzaki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306276 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5320625 | Bertin | Jun 1994 | A |
5324293 | Rehmann | Jun 1994 | A |
5325029 | Janecke et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329933 | Graf | Jul 1994 | A |
5342367 | Ferrante et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343391 | Mushabac | Aug 1994 | A |
5358526 | Tornier | Oct 1994 | A |
5376093 | Newman | Dec 1994 | A |
5395377 | Petersen et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5417694 | Marik et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423827 | Mumme | Jun 1995 | A |
5431653 | Callaway | Jul 1995 | A |
5462548 | Pappas et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5468244 | Attfield et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474088 | Zaharkin et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486177 | Mumme et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5514143 | Bonutti et al. | May 1996 | A |
5529070 | Augustine et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540696 | Booth, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540697 | Rehmann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553198 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5576727 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584837 | Peterson | Dec 1996 | A |
5597379 | Haines et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611353 | Dance et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624444 | Wixson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628750 | Whitlock et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645077 | Foxlin | Jul 1997 | A |
5653764 | Murphy | Aug 1997 | A |
5681316 | DeOrio et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683398 | Carls et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688282 | Baron et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5720752 | Elliot et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724264 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748767 | Raab | May 1998 | A |
5769861 | Vilsmeier | Jun 1998 | A |
5776137 | Katz | Jul 1998 | A |
5788700 | Morawa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5824085 | Sahay et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5840047 | Stedham | Nov 1998 | A |
5880714 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5916219 | Matsuno et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919149 | Allum | Jul 1999 | A |
5935086 | Beacon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5976156 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6027507 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036696 | Lambrecht et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6056756 | Eng et al. | May 2000 | A |
6090114 | Matsuno et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094019 | Saiki | Jul 2000 | A |
6120509 | Wheeler | Sep 2000 | A |
6122538 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126608 | Kemme et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162191 | Foxin | Dec 2000 | A |
6167292 | Badano et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171310 | Giordano | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195615 | Lysen | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197032 | Lawes et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214013 | Lambrech et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214014 | McGann | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216029 | Paltieli | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246898 | Vesely et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258095 | Lombardo et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261247 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6299646 | Chambat et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332089 | Acker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348058 | Melken et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354011 | Albrecht | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361506 | Saenger et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361507 | Foxlin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361508 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377839 | Kalfas et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381485 | Hunter et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383149 | DeMayo | May 2002 | B1 |
6395005 | Lovell | May 2002 | B1 |
6447448 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468280 | Saenger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470207 | Simon et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471637 | Green et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473635 | Rasche | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477400 | Barrick | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477421 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478799 | Williamson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488713 | Hershnerger | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499488 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514259 | Picard et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527443 | Vilsmeier | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551325 | Neubauer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6585666 | Suh et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6595997 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6595999 | Marchione et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607487 | Chang et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6640128 | Vilsmeier et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648896 | Overes et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679916 | Frankie et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685655 | DeMayo | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6685711 | Axelson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711431 | Sarin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712824 | Millard et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715213 | Richter | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725080 | Melkent et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725173 | An | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6743235 | Rao | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770078 | Bonutti | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786877 | Foxlin | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802864 | Tornier | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6817470 | Goldberg | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820025 | Bachmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827723 | Carson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6917827 | Kienzle, III | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923817 | Carson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928742 | Broers et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947783 | Immerz | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6986181 | Murphy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997882 | Parker et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007699 | Martinelli et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021140 | Perkins | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027477 | Sutter et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037310 | Murphy | May 2006 | B2 |
7048741 | Swanson | May 2006 | B2 |
7089148 | Bachmann et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7094241 | Hodorek et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104998 | Yoon et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7105028 | Murphy | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7194295 | Vilsmeier | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7209776 | Leitner | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7219033 | Kolen | May 2007 | B2 |
7273500 | Williamson | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7311441 | Weaver et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7331932 | Leitner | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7344541 | Haines et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7392076 | Moctezuma de La Barrera | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7396357 | Tornier et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7444178 | Goldbach | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7468075 | Lang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468077 | Rochetin | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7497029 | Plassky et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7520880 | Claypool et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7547307 | Carson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559931 | Stone | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7578821 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7594933 | Kammerzell et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7611520 | Broers et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7611522 | Gorek | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621920 | Claypool et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623902 | Pacheco | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7726564 | Goldbach | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7776098 | Murphy | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7815644 | Masini | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831292 | Quaid et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7834847 | Boillot et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840256 | Lakin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846092 | Murphy | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857821 | Couture et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7885705 | Murphy | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7970174 | Goldbach | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8057479 | Stone | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057482 | Stone | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8078254 | Murphy | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8104960 | Gill et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8118815 | van der Walt | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8241296 | Wasielewski | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8265790 | Amiot et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8267938 | Murphy | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277455 | Couture et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8282685 | Rochetin et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8355773 | Leitner et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8412308 | Goldbach | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8421854 | Zerkin | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8446473 | Goldbach | May 2013 | B2 |
8512346 | Couture | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8551108 | Pelletier et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8588892 | Hladio et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8690888 | Stein et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718820 | Amiot et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8734432 | Tuma et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8764758 | Echeverri | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8867198 | Steele | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8888786 | Stone | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8911447 | van der Walt et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8974467 | Stone | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8974468 | Borja | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8998910 | Borja et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9044218 | Young | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9138319 | Fanson et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9192392 | van der Walt et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9262802 | Aghazadeh | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9271756 | van der Walt et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9339226 | van der Walt et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9375178 | Aghazadeh | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9456769 | Stein et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9549742 | Berend et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9572586 | van der Walt et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9642572 | Mahfouz et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9649160 | van der Walt et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9775725 | van der Walt et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9855075 | van der Walt et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9930946 | Zondervan | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9931059 | Borja | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10206714 | van der Walt et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10238510 | van der Walt et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10321852 | Borja | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10363149 | van der Walt et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10597178 | Ryterski et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10603115 | van der Walt et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10716580 | Berend et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10863995 | Nielsen et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10864019 | van der Walt et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10869771 | van der Walt et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10918499 | Nielsen et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
11020245 | van der Walt et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11179062 | Borja et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11179167 | Stone | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11191334 | Aghazadeh et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11273232 | Placik | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11540746 | Borja et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11547451 | van der Walt et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11547580 | Nielsen et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11633293 | van der Walt et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11653981 | van der Walt et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
11684392 | van der Walt et al. | Jun 2023 | B2 |
20020077540 | Kienzie, III | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103610 | Bachmann et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107522 | Picard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133175 | Carson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020198451 | Carson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030019294 | Richter | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030069591 | Carson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093080 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105470 | White | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120282 | Scouten et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030163142 | Paltieli et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181919 | Gorek | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184297 | Jakab | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199882 | Gorek | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204965 | Hennessey | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229356 | Dye | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006393 | Burkinshaw | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019382 | Amirouche | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034313 | Leitner | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039396 | Couture et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068260 | Cossette et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073225 | Subba Rao | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087958 | Myers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040087962 | Gorek | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097952 | Sarin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102792 | Sarin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122441 | Muratsu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147926 | Iversen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040149036 | Foxlin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152955 | McGinley | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152970 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153066 | Coon et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153079 | Tsougarakis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181144 | Cinquin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201857 | Foxlin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230197 | Tornier et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243148 | Wasielewski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021037 | McCombs et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021044 | Stone et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050070864 | Fellion | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107799 | Graf et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113846 | Carson | May 2005 | A1 |
20050149040 | Haines et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149054 | Gorek | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050197814 | Aram et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209605 | Grimm et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222574 | Giordano et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234332 | Murphy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251026 | Stone | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251148 | Friedrich | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060009780 | Foley et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015018 | Jutras et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015120 | Richard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020177 | Seo et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064105 | Raistrick et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084977 | Lieberman | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089657 | Broers et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094958 | Marquart et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122491 | Murray et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142656 | Malackowski et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142657 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149276 | Grimm | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161051 | Terrill-Grisoni et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060217733 | Plassky et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217734 | Sanford et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241639 | Kuczynski et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060270949 | Mathie et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282023 | Leitner | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070032748 | McNeil et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043287 | Degraaf | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043375 | Anissian | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073296 | Panchbhavi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100346 | Wyss et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162142 | Stone | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179626 | de la Barrera et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070179628 | Rochetin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219559 | Heavener et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219561 | Lavallee et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226986 | Park et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244488 | Metzger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249967 | Buly et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270718 | Rochetin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270973 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287911 | Haid et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080058945 | Hajaj et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071195 | Cuellar et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103509 | Goldbach | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108912 | Node-Langlois | May 2008 | A1 |
20080162074 | Schneider | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183179 | Siebel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195109 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202200 | West | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211768 | Breen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243127 | Lang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249394 | Giori et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262812 | Arata et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275451 | McAllister et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281328 | Lang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285805 | Luinge et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000626 | Quaid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090000627 | Quaid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012532 | Quaid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040224 | Igarashi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070038 | Geelen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076507 | Claypool et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076519 | Iversen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088753 | Aram et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099665 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090171370 | Yoon et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209884 | Van Vorhis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216247 | Collette | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216285 | Ek | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234360 | Alexander | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247863 | Proulx et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248044 | Amiot et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264737 | Haechler et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270864 | Poncet | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270865 | Poncet et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270868 | Park et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270869 | Colquhoun et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270874 | Santarella et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270875 | Poncet | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270928 | Stone et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276054 | Clifford et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281545 | Stubbs | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289806 | Thornberry | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292227 | Scholten et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299416 | Haenni et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299483 | Amirouche et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306679 | Murphy | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312973 | Hatlestad et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318836 | Stone et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318930 | Stone et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318931 | Stone et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324078 | Wu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100016705 | Stone | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023018 | Theofilos | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063509 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064216 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069911 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076505 | Borja | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087829 | Metzger et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100011 | Roche | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100154 | Roche | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113980 | Herr et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121334 | Couture et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137871 | Borja | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153081 | Bellettre et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179605 | Branch et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182914 | DelRegno et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192662 | Yanni | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198067 | Mahfouz et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198275 | Chana | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204551 | Roche | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204575 | Roche et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204955 | Roche et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211077 | Couture et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100239996 | Ertl | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241126 | Ghijselings | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249533 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249534 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249535 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249659 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249665 | Roche | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249787 | Roche | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249788 | Roche | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249790 | Roche | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249791 | Roche | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250276 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250284 | Roche et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250571 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256504 | Moreau-Gaudry et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100261998 | Stiehl | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268067 | Razzaque et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100298661 | McCombie et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324457 | Bean et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326187 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326194 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326210 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326211 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327848 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327880 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328077 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328098 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331633 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331663 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331679 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331680 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331681 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331682 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331683 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331685 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331687 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331704 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331718 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331733 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331734 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331735 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331736 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331737 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331738 | Stein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331894 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332152 | Stein | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028865 | Luinge et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032184 | Roche et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110093081 | Chana et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110213275 | Boos et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218458 | Valin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218546 | De La Fuente Klein et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110275957 | Bhandari | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120029389 | Amiot et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120053488 | Boutin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120053594 | Pelletier et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120093377 | Tsougarakis et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120157887 | Fanson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172712 | Bar-Tal | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120172884 | Zheng et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203140 | Malchau et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130053859 | Penenberg | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130064478 | Sold et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130066323 | Nycz et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079678 | Stein et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079679 | Roche et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079680 | Stein et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079790 | Stein et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079791 | Stein et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079793 | Stein et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130190887 | Fanson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130274633 | Hladio et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140005673 | Pelletier et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031672 | McCaulley et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140114179 | Muller et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140134586 | Stein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135658 | Hladio et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135744 | Stein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135773 | Stein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136143 | Stein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140182062 | Aghazadeh | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140224685 | Carnevali | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140270583 | Anderson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275940 | Hladio et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276000 | Mullaney et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276864 | Aghazadeh | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303631 | Thornberry | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330281 | Aghazadeh | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140364858 | Li et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150018718 | Aghazadeh | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150127009 | Berend et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142372 | Singh | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143781 | Agnihotri | May 2015 | A1 |
20150150569 | van der Walt et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164657 | Miles et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150238204 | Stone | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245914 | Langton | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150313723 | Jansen | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150342516 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160038242 | Lo Iacono et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160175055 | Hook et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160213383 | van der Walt et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160220315 | Falardeau | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160220318 | Falardeau et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160220385 | Falardeau et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160278943 | van der Walt et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160346044 | Brown et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180064496 | Hladio et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180177509 | Trabish et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180206860 | van der Walt et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180235762 | Radermacher et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190350728 | van der Walt et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200352654 | van der Walt et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200390501 | Brown et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210153880 | Nielsen et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210153908 | van der Walt et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210186711 | van der Walt et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210220152 | Nielsen et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210315716 | van der Walt et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20220071509 | Borja et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220313455 | van der Walt et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220378516 | Sierra et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20230059247 | Gannoe | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230135541 | Borja et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230149185 | Nielsen et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230157727 | van der Walt et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230248447 | van der Walt et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230277335 | van der Walt et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2241359 | Dec 1999 | CA |
2 594 874 | Jul 2006 | CA |
2 537 711 | Aug 2007 | CA |
109846528 | Jun 2019 | CN |
4 225 112 | Dec 1993 | DE |
29704393 | Aug 1997 | DE |
198 30 359 | Jan 2000 | DE |
20116368 | Dec 2001 | DE |
0 557 591 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0 651 968 | May 1995 | EP |
1 635 705 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1 817 547 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2 957 249 | Dec 2015 | EP |
3 395 281 | Oct 2018 | EP |
2 197 790 | Jun 1988 | GB |
2 511 885 | Sep 2014 | GB |
07-184929 | Jul 1995 | JP |
H08-240611 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2006-314775 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006-528496 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007-503289 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007-534351 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-521574 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008-537496 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2009-511136 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2011-502626 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2013-000230 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2014-524815 | Sep 2014 | JP |
2015-524733 | Aug 2015 | JP |
2015-226613 | Dec 2015 | JP |
6980248 | Nov 2021 | JP |
7180159 | Nov 2022 | JP |
WO 9960939 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 2001030247 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 02000131 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0217798 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2004080323 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004112610 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005006993 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2006119387 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007136784 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008073999 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008129414 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009117833 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2010011978 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010030809 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010063117 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2011044273 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO 2012006066 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO 2012006172 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO 2012027815 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012027816 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012082164 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2012113054 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2013012561 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2013169674 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2013173700 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2013188960 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO 2014028227 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014063181 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014197988 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2015054745 | Apr 2015 | WO |
WO 2016070288 | May 2016 | WO |
WO 2016134168 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016147153 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO 2016154489 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO 2017093769 | Jun 2017 | WO |
WO 2018085900 | May 2018 | WO |
WO 2018169980 | Sep 2018 | WO |
WO 2018169995 | Sep 2018 | WO |
WO 2019036752 | Feb 2019 | WO |
WO 2021119001 | Jun 2021 | WO |
WO 2021188798 | Sep 2021 | WO |
WO 2022165561 | Aug 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
510 (k) Summary for Total Knee Surgetics Navigation System, in 5 pages. |
510 (k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for BrainLAB knee, in 5 pages. |
Anderson MD., Kevin, et al., “Computer Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005, vol. 20, No. 7, Suppl. 3, in 7 pages. |
Ang, et al., An Active Hand-Held Instrument for Enhanced Microsurgical Accuracy, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2000, vol. 1935, pp. 878-887. |
Arnold-Moore, et al., Architecture of a Content Management Server for XML Document Applications, RMIT Multimedia Database Systems, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Victoria Australia, in 12 pages. |
ArthroCAD, Enhancing orthopedic outcomes through optimal alignment, 2012, pp. in 2 pages. |
Bae et al., “Computer Assisted Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty”, Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2011, vol. 3, pp. 259-267. |
Bargren, MD., et al,, Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty, Correlated Biomechanical and Clinical Observations, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Mar. 1, 1983, Issue 173, pp. 178-183, Philadelphia. |
Bathis, H. et al., “Alignment in total knee arthroplasty”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br), 2004, 86-B, pp. 682-687, British Editorial. |
Bhandari, Design and Prototype of a Computer Assisted Surgical Navigation System for Total Knee Replacement Surgery, May 12, 2009, pp. in 294 pages. |
Biomet Orthopedics, Inc, Vision Acetabular Surgical Techniques, website brochure, pp. 16 pages. |
Biomet Orthopedics, Inc., Universal Ringlock® Acetabular Series, vol. website brochure, pp. 13 pages. |
Brainlab, “Position Determination and Calibration in optical tracking systems”, FLORENUS the technology merchants, in 2 pages. |
Brainlab, “Tracking and imaging in Navigation”, FLORENUS, in 2 pages. |
Brennan, et al., Quantification of Inertial Sensor-Based 3D Joint Angle Measurement Accuracy Using and Instrumented Gimbal, Gait & Posture, May 23, 2011, vol. 34, pp. 320-323. |
Chauhan, et al., Computer-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty Versus a Conventional Jig-Based Technique, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2004, vol. 86-B, pp. 372-377. |
Cutti, et al., Motion Analysis of the Upper-Limb Based on Inertial Sensors: Part 1—Protocol Description, Journal of Biomechanics, Jan. 1, 2007, vol. 40, pp. S250. |
Decking, MD., et al., Leg Axis After Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty, The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005, vol. 20, Issue 3, pp. 282-288. |
Depuy, Johnson & Johnson, Co.,, Summit Cemented Hip System, website brochure, pp. 21 pages. |
De Momi, et al., “In-vitro experimental assessment of a new robust algorithm for hip joint centre estimation”, Journal of Biomechanics, Feb. 26, 2009, vol. 42, pp. 989-995. |
Digioia III, MD., et al., “Comparison of a Mechanical Acetabular Alignment Guide with Computer Placement of the Socket”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, Apr. 2002, vol. 17, No. 3, in 6 pages. |
Eric Foxlin, Chapter 7. Motion Tracking Requirements and Technologies, Handbook of Virtual Environment Technology, 2002, vol. Kay Stanney, Ed., Issue Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. |
Favre, et al., 3D Evaluation of the Knee Joint Using Ambulatory System: Application to ACL-Deficient Knees, Journal of Biomechanics, Jan. 1, 2007, vol. 40, pp. S251. |
Favre, et al., A New Ambulatory System for Comparative Evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Knee Kinematics, Applied to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Jan. 19, 2006, vol. 14, pp. 592-604. |
Favre, et al., Ambulatory Measurement of 3D Knee Joint Angle, Journal of Biomechanics, Jan. 28, 2008, vol. 41, Issue 1029-1035. |
Fixed Reference Surgical Technique, SIGMA High Performance Instruments, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., 2008, Warsaw, IN, in 52pages. |
Ganapathi et al., “Limb Length and Femoral Offset Reconstruction During THA Using CT-Free Computer Navigation”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009, vol. 91-B, Supplement III, p. 399. |
Goniometer, AllHeart.com, 2004, website: http://allheart.com/allheart, (1 page). |
Haaker et al., “Computer-Assisted Navigation Increases Precision of Component Placement in Total Knee Arthroplasty”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Apr. 2005, vol. 433, pp. 152-159. |
Hofstetter, Ph.D., et al., “Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopy-Based Reduction of FemoralFractures and Antetorsion Correction”, Computer Aided Surgery, 2000, vol. 5, pp. 311-325, Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
Hsieh, Pang-Hsin, et al., “Image-guided periacetabular osteotomy: computer-assisted navigation compared with the conventional technique: A randomized study of 36 patients followed for 2 years”, Acta Orthopaedica, Aug. 1, 2006, 77:4, pp. 591-597. |
IASSIST Knee, Surgical Technique, Zimmer, Inc., 2012. |
International Preliminary Report for Application No. PCT/US2004/018244, dated Dec. 13, 2005, in 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/039770, dated Sep. 25, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/039770, dated Nov. 11, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/041556, dated Sep. 13, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/041556, dated Nov. 18, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/053182, dated Nov. 11, 2013. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2004/018244, dated Feb. 15, 2005, in 4 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/051769 dated Nov. 19, 2009, in 11 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/051769 dated Nov. 19, 2009, in 3 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/022162, dated Jun. 16, 2011, in 4 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/056553, dated Nov. 4, 2009, in 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/053182, dated Feb. 17, 2015, in 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2016/018508, dated Jun. 22, 2016, in 19 pages. |
Jenny, et al., Computer-Assisted Implantation of Total Knee Prosthesis: A Case-ControlComparative Study with Classical Instrumentation, Computer Aided Surgery, 2001, vol. 6, pp. 217-220. |
Konyves et al., “The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br), Feb. 2005, vol. 87-B, No. 2, pp. 155-157. |
Leenders, MD., et al., “Reduction in Variability of Acetabular Cup Abduction Using Computer Assisted Surgery: A Prospective and Randomized Study”, Computer Aided Surgery, 2002, vol. 7, pp. 99-106. |
Leung, et al., Intraobserver Errors in Obtaining Visually Selected Anatomic Landmarks During Registration Process in Nonimage-based Navigation-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty, The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005, vol. 20, Issue 5, pp. 591-601. |
Liebergall, Meir, et al., “ Computerized Navigation for the Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Am, 2006, vol. 88, pp. 1748-1754. |
Longo, et al., MIKA Surgical Technique, DJO Surgical, 2008, Austin Texas in 14 pages. |
Luinge, Inertial Sensing of Human Movement, Twente University Press, Feb. 15, 1973, pp. in 88 pages. |
Mackenzie, et al., A Two-Ball Mouse Affords Three Degrees of Freedom, Extended Abstracts of the CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Compounding Systems (as printed from the internet on Jun. 13, 2012 URL: http://www.yorku.ca/mack/CHI97a.htm), 1997, pp. 303-304. |
Medical Research Ltd, Clinical Goniometer, http://www.mie-uk.com/Gonio, 1997, pp. 1 page. |
Minimally Invasive TKA GENESIS II Anterior Cut First, Surgical Technique, Smith & Nephew, Nov. 2003, Memphis TN, in 16 pages. |
Noble et al., “Computer Simulation: How Can it Help the Surgeon Optimize Implant Position?”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Dec. 2003, vol. 417, pp. 242-252. |
Parratte, Sebastien, et al., “Validation and Usefulness of a Computer-Assisted Cup-Positioning System in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Am, 2007, vol. 89, pp. 494-499. |
PERSEUS Intelligent Cutting Guide, Orthokey, Product Guide, in 8 pages. |
PERSEUS Intelligent Cutting Guide, Smart Instruments for Knee Arthroplasty, Orthokey, in 2 pages. |
Ritter, M.D., et al., Postoperative Alignment of Total Knee Replacement, Its Effect on Survival, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Feb. 1, 1994, Issue 299, pp. 153-156, Philadelphia. |
Rocon, et al., Application of Inertial Sensors and Rehabilitation Robotics, Rehabilitation Robotics 2007, Jun. 1, 2007, pp. 145-150. |
Sacks-Davis et al., Atlas: A nested Relational Database System for Text Applications, IEEE Transations on Knowledge and Data Engineering, v.7, n.3, Jun. 1995, pp. 454-470. |
Schep, et al., “Computer assisted orthopaedic and trauma surgery State of the art and future perspectives”, Injury Int. J. Care Injured 34, (website: www.elsevier.com/locate/injury), 2003 pp. 299-306. |
Scott, M.S., et al., P.F.C. Sigma Knee System, Primary Surgical Technique Part 1 of 2, DePuy International Ltd., 2003, England, (up to p. 44), in 48 pages. |
Scott, M.S., et al., P.F.C. Sigma Knee System, Primary Surgical Technique Part 2 of 2, DePuy International Ltd., 2003, England, Part A (up to p. 74), in 31 pages. (This reference was split in two due to size exceeding over 25MB). |
Scott, M.S., et al., P.F.C. Sigma Knee System, Primary Surgical Technique Part 2 of 2, DePuy International Ltd., 2003, England, Part B (up to p. 104), in 31 pages. (This reference was split in two due to size exceeding over 25MB). |
Sikorski et al., “Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery: Do We Need CAOS?”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br), Apr. 2003, vol. 85-B, No. 3, pp. 319-323. |
Slomczykowski, et al., “Novel Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopy System for Intraoperative Guidance: Feasibility Study for Distal Locking of Femoral Nails”, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2001, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 122-131, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia. |
Stulberg, et al., Computer-Assisted Total Knee Replacement Arthroplasty, Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, Jan. 2000, vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 25-39. |
The Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Academy News, http://www.aaos.org/wordhtml/2001news/b6-01.htm, Mar. 1, 2001, pp. 1 page. |
Tilt Sensors: High Accuracy, Digital Series, Crossbow Technology, Inc., pp. 32-35. |
Upadhyay et al., “Medical Malpractice in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2007, vol. 22, No. 6, Suppl. 2, pp. 2-7. |
Visser, et al., 3D Analysis of Upper Body Movements in Bilateral Amputee Gait Using Inertial Sensors, Journal of Biomechanics, Jan. 1, 2007, vol. 40, Issue S509. |
Wentzensen et al., “Image-based hip navigation”, International Orthopaedics (SICOT), 2003, vol. 27 (Suppl. 1), pp. S43-S46. |
Wolfstadt et al., “An intelligent instrument for improved leg length and hip offset accuracy in total hip arthroplasty”, Abstract Only. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/051769, dated Nov. 19, 2009, in 7 pages. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/022162, dated Jun. 16, 2011, in 9 pages. |
Written Opinion of the ISR for Application No. PCT/US2004/018244, dated Mar. 14, 2005, in 10 pages. |
Wylde et al., “Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement”, International Orthopaedics, 2009, vol. 33, pp. 905-909. |
Wylde et al., “Patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after total hip replacement: prevalence and impact on functional outcome”, International Orthopaedics, 2008, vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 210-216. |
Zheng et al., “Technical Principles of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery”, Suomen Ortopedia ja Traumatologia, Feb. 2008, vol. 31, pp. 135-147. |
Zhou, et al., Use of Multiple Wearable Inertial Sensors in Upper Limb Motion Tracking, Medical Engineering & Physics, Jan. 1, 2008, vol. 30, pp. 123-133. |
Zimmer NexGen Flexion Balancing Instruments, Surgical Technique, 2007, www.zimmer.com, in 44 pages. |
Zorman, David, et al., “Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: comparative results in a preliminary series of 72 cases”, ActaOrthop. Belg., 2005, 71, pp. 696-702. |
Shah et al., “Is the pelvis stable during supine total hip arthroplasty?”, Acta Orthop Belg., Mar. 1, 2017, vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 81-86. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220240953 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60476998 | Jun 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15478516 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 17529606 | US | |
Parent | 14639758 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15478516 | US | |
Parent | 13295391 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 14639758 | US | |
Parent | 12502182 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 13295391 | US | |
Parent | 11182528 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 12502182 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10864085 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11182528 | US |