The present invention concerns a surgical shoulder articulation replacement method.
Current surgical techniques for shoulder articulation replacement include several successive steps including reaming the humeral head, making an entry into the bone, preparing the bone including punching, compacting, fixing an implant, protecting the implant, making a trial articulation mounting and mounting the final implant. All these preparation steps are long and costly. Moreover, the known techniques which use patient specific implants or ranges of implants also need patient specific or ancillary tools such as rasps, drills and cutting guides, whose manufacturing and shipping is costly.
A goal of the invention is to provide a new surgical method for shoulder articulation replacement which is more simple, and less costly than the techniques of the prior art.
To this end, the invention concerns a surgical shoulder articulation replacement method consisting of:
Thanks to the invention, the long and costly bone preparation steps and ancillary tools are no more needed, as the implant is directly impacted into the bone, creating a hole in the bone.
The invention also concerns a surgical shoulder articulation replacement method consisting of:
The invention further concerns a surgical shoulder articulation replacement method consisting of:
According to further aspects of the invention which are advantageous but not compulsory, such a surgical method may incorporate one or several of the following features:
The invention will now be explained in reference to the annexed drawings, as an illustrative example. In the annexed drawings,
As represented on
In an embodiment, the method further comprises a pre-op planning/imaging step, which is operated prior to the step of providing the humeral implant 2 and which consists of determining the size and shape of the implant 2 using imaging. The imaging may include CT scans, MRI or any other convenient imaging technique. In one embodiment, the implant may have a radius of curvature (along a longitudinal axis), which is determined in the pre-op planning/imaging.
In an embodiment, the humeral implant 2 may be made by additive manufacturing. This allows providing the humeral implant 2 with a non-tubular shape, for example a curved hollow shape as represented on the figures, or any other shape determined on the basis of the shape of the humeral head of the patient. For example, the implant may be manufactured by metal powder bed fusion technologies.
Of course, other manufacturing processes may be considered for obtaining the humeral implant 2.
In an embodiment, the humeral implant 2 is manufactured in titanium or titanium alloy.
In an embodiment, the humeral implant 2 may be manufactured in its final shape in a single operation. The implant 2 does not need complementary machining operations to obtain its final shape.
The method may provide to provide a set of humeral implants 2 of different sizes and shapes. The surgeon may choose between the different sizes and shapes depending on the shape and size of the humeral head 1 of the patient determined by imaging techniques.
Alternatively, the humeral implant 2 may be patient-specific sized and shaped and directly manufactured in its patient-specific final state by additive manufacturing, to best fit to the shoulder articulation of the patient.
The method may consist of impacting the humeral implant 2 with a non-shown striking instrument, such as a hammer, by striking the implant 2 directly on the articulation surface 6.
In an alternative optional embodiment represented on
In an embodiment, the method may consist of impacting the holding tool 8 with a non-shown striking instrument, such as a hammer. The holding tool 8 may comprise a flat top surface 84 provided for striking the holding tool 8 with a hammer.
In an optional embodiment, the method may consist of impacting a detachable portion 9 of the humeral implant 2 with a striking instrument, then removing the detachable portion 9 once the humeral implant 2 is at its final place in the bone. The detachable portion 9 may be, for example, a part manufactured together with a main body of the humeral implant, or another part mounted on the mounting surface 6 and provided to protect the mounting surface 6 during transport and/or impaction.
In an embodiment, the method further comprises a step consisting of attaching the non-shown articulation member on the mounting surface 6 of the humeral implant 2.
Prior to impacting the humeral implant 2 in the humeral head 1, the method may comprise a step consisting of making a cut in a cortical bone portion 1b of the humeral head 1, so as to uncover the cancellous bone 1c, and provide a flat resected surface 1a.
In a non-shown embodiment; the hollow stem 4 of the humeral implant 2 may be pierced with transversal holes. The cancellous bone 1c may get inside the interior channel 40 during impaction of the humeral implant 2 via the transversal holes.
In an embodiment, the hollow stem 4 may have a circular cross-section or an ovoid cross-section.
As represented on the figures, the humeral implant 2 may have an increasing transversal section from the sharp distal edge 42 to the mounting surface 6. In non-shown alternatives, the transversal section of the humeral implant 2 may have different progression profiles.
In some embodiment, the method may comprise a step consisting of providing an insertion guide 3 adapted to guide the impaction of the humeral implant 2. Such insertion guide 3 may include, for example, an insertion window Win which the humeral implant 2 is inserted during impaction so that the humeral implant 2 follows the right path for the intended final position of the humeral implant 2.
In an optional embodiment represented on
To this end, a positioning tool 10, represented on
From the inferior surface 124 extends a protrusion 126 provided with a lateral contour 126a that is complementary to the shape of the hole 104. From the protrusion 126 extends an impacting body 128 which is formed by a tube having a transversal section matching the transversal section of the hollow stem 4 of the humeral implant 2. As represented on
In an alternative embodiment represented on
The method allows providing a lighter humeral implant for the patient, due to the hollow feature of the humeral implant. The hollow feature of the humeral implant also allows savings on raw materials and weight of shipments.
The insertion of the cancellous bone 1c into the interior channel 40 allows cancellous bone preserving and a non-invasive technique.
The direct impaction of the humeral implant 2 in the cancellous bone allows time saving in operation room, as time for bone preparation is greatly reduced. The direct impaction also allows cost reduction on expensive patient-specific or ranges of compactor, rasps and cutting guides, and subsequent shipment weight and costs.
The use of additive manufacturing techniques allows savings on post machining operations, and makes possible specific implant shapes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4101985 | Baumann | Jul 1978 | A |
4549319 | Meyer | Oct 1985 | A |
4904262 | Bensmann | Feb 1990 | A |
5032134 | Lindwer | Jul 1991 | A |
5047060 | Henssge | Sep 1991 | A |
5092899 | Forte | Mar 1992 | A |
5152798 | Kranz | Oct 1992 | A |
5156628 | Kranz | Oct 1992 | A |
5316550 | Forte | May 1994 | A |
5330536 | Tager | Jul 1994 | A |
5480453 | Burke | Jan 1996 | A |
5658352 | Draenert | Aug 1997 | A |
5725592 | White | Mar 1998 | A |
5871549 | Jayashankar | Feb 1999 | A |
5976137 | Mayer | Nov 1999 | A |
6093209 | Sanders | Jul 2000 | A |
6391031 | Toomey | May 2002 | B1 |
7001392 | McGovern | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7390327 | Collazo | Jun 2008 | B2 |
8778030 | Sidebotham | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20010047210 | Wolf | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20050125067 | Sweeney | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20120010722 | Walter | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120296339 | Iannotti | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130114873 | Chaoui | May 2013 | A1 |
20130304228 | Phipps | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140330390 | Liu | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20160000579 | Ramachandran et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160015380 | Sholev | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160143749 | Holovacs | May 2016 | A1 |
20160324648 | Hodorek | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170304063 | Hatzidakis | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 721 767 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0 765 644 | Apr 1997 | EP |
2 502 605 | Sep 2012 | EP |
WO 2006052874 | May 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 17206573.2, dated May 18, 2018, in 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180161176 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62433492 | Dec 2016 | US |